Home Cool News Coaxial Reviews Zone Chat Contact Us Sign in

Those Wonderful Jumping, Hopping Mice of CORALINE - CG?

Hey folks, Harry here... It seems I've seen quite a bit of talk about the alleged CG in CORALINE and a scene that many folks are pointing out involves all those amazing hopping synchronized mice that we've seen in trailers. I've watched this scene 3 times now. Once at BUTT-NUMB-A-THON out of context and twice in context with the entire film (Review is Embargoed, but it is also brilliant).

You guys familiar with George Pal's short film work?
















Ok - you see that animation? The form of animation that you're looking at involves a process called SUBSTITUTION ANIMATION.

You saw it used in NIGHTMARE BEFORE CHRISTMAS... you know all those different Jack and Sally heads that were placed at 24 frames a second? The reason you go that route is it gives you a higher degree of control of expression and emotion, along with a great deal of accuracy with lip syncing. What you saw less of was body movement Substitution.

In the above toons, you'll see Squaching and Stretching of forms that do not have armatures in place. The way this is done is by creating three dimensional figures at different stages of motion, this gives a very smooth and sensational look for the characters.

I know this, because Henry Selick gave me one of the 500 mice that were created to make that astonishing sequence of the movie. And I say astonishing, because once you see the sequence in 3D, your jaw will drop. It is, frankly amazing. The picture below is of one of Bobinsky's Trained Jumping Circus Mice. He is suspended in mid-air by a tiny rod holding him up from underneath and this rod is digitally removed with a computer. Much like 'wire-removal' in stunt sequences... just applied to animation. As Henry informed our audience, in the old days they would have used "Spider Wire" which was so thin that the eyes rarely, if ever caught it. However, this sometimes allowed for shifting and wasn't as secure as a rod. So... a computer was used to remove the rod, but human hands carved, painted and placed a real solid object for each frame of the animation.

ALSO.. Henry mentioned at the Q&A an even more amazing aspect of the film. A single camera lens shot the film in 3D. For every frame of the film, two separate photos were taken, then interlaced later for the 3D. This way they could approximate our visual depth perception on a miniature scale, which no camera exists to do. So essentially, they shot the movie twice and there was no miraculous new 3D technology, they did it mathmatically and with precision of human effort. Pretty amazing if you ask me. Here's Bobinsky's Trained Circus Mouse...





AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Click for previous story Talk Back More on this story Click for next story

User login

Reader Talkback

remarkable
by Somerichs
Jan 27th, 2009
12:52:20 AM
FIRST FUCKERS
by unionJACKass.webs.com
Jan 27th, 2009
12:52:30 AM
I'd have said we can't wait to see it...
by Somerichs
Jan 27th, 2009
12:53:51 AM
He ain't as good as Mr Jingles!!
by unionJACKass.webs.com
Jan 27th, 2009
12:56:15 AM
Hell yeah! the Zoltar bust kicks ass!
by BatPsycho
Jan 27th, 2009
01:25:57 AM
At this point, I would forgive a little CG. The fact there's not
by The Shyster
Jan 27th, 2009
01:26:34 AM
Tubby Tuba almost looks like old Pixar CGI.
by Orionsangels
Jan 27th, 2009
01:49:14 AM
This will be every bit as wonderful as...
by BiggusDickus
Jan 27th, 2009
01:59:33 AM
My gf dumped me after seeing this preview, i refuse to watch it.
by Mike_D
Jan 27th, 2009
02:04:58 AM
I boned a chick who broke up with her bf after seeing this previ
by Heckles
Jan 27th, 2009
02:22:49 AM
How creepy and dark is this movie going to be?
by Spifftacular Squirrel Girl
Jan 27th, 2009
02:38:41 AM
Those hands worked to create this movie were in Portland the who
by DOGSOUP
Jan 27th, 2009
03:05:34 AM
Hardly Brilliant
by barneyshouldbeputdown
Jan 27th, 2009
03:55:30 AM
Squirrel Girl
by barneyshouldbeputdown
Jan 27th, 2009
04:04:28 AM
Cuaron + NEVERWHERE =...
by unionJACKass.webs.com
Jan 27th, 2009
05:04:43 AM
Mike D
by LOTGA
Jan 27th, 2009
06:57:31 AM
"harder, faster, deeper"?
by catlettuce4
Jan 27th, 2009
07:10:58 AM
Replacment animation is insane.
by Obscura
Jan 27th, 2009
07:17:14 AM
unionJACKass.webs.com
by Dingbatty
Jan 27th, 2009
07:44:48 AM
I can't wait...
by lovecraftian
Jan 27th, 2009
08:12:46 AM
Yeah, agreed
by Bagheera
Jan 27th, 2009
08:38:09 AM
I have that Zoltar bust
by Ye Not Guilty
Jan 27th, 2009
09:52:33 AM
The Pyramids were built mathmatic precise... We've got this...
by YotzVonFrelnik
Jan 27th, 2009
10:43:05 AM
I needs me that Zoltar bust!
by SpyGuy
Jan 27th, 2009
01:29:32 PM
You need to clean your desk
by yomomma
Jan 27th, 2009
01:55:00 PM
IM STILL WAITING FOR A SANDMAN MOVIE.
by alice 13
Jan 27th, 2009
02:00:59 PM
SELICK on LIVE WIRE JAN 31st
by I am the most horrible
Jan 27th, 2009
03:22:56 PM
PS I heard that Gaiman...
by I am the most horrible
Jan 27th, 2009
03:23:36 PM
From memory that's not the only CG
by half vader
Jan 27th, 2009
03:56:52 PM
I've seen one of the mice, too
by Mooseboy
Jan 27th, 2009
05:51:40 PM
Couldn't care less about this movie, but I'm glad it exists.
by PotSmokinAlien
Jan 27th, 2009
06:56:32 PM
alice 13
by PotSmokinAlien
Jan 27th, 2009
06:57:48 PM
NEIL LOVES PORTLAND
by DOGSOUP
Jan 27th, 2009
07:16:26 PM
Yup. You got it.
by The Great FuckTater
Jan 27th, 2009
09:50:25 PM
Exactly what I was sayin', Fucktater
by half vader
Jan 27th, 2009
11:10:28 PM
So what if they had used CG
by ELGordo
Jan 28th, 2009
05:03:31 AM
I don't think it's really an issue Gordo
by half vader
Jan 28th, 2009
07:01:48 AM
half vader
by Eats_sandwich_gets_laid.
Jan 29th, 2009
09:33:20 AM
No not the Knight
by half vader
Jan 30th, 2009
10:05:28 PM

Quick Talkback

Please login to post talkback.