Cool News
Capone and Castro…or at least the dude who plays Castro in CHE--Demián Bichir!!!
Hey everyone. Capone in Chicago here.
My only exposure to the hugely successful Mexican-born actor Demián Bichir has been in the last year on the Showtime series "Weeds." He plays Esteban, mayor of Tijuana, the region's largest drug kingpin, and passionate lover to Mary-Louise Parker's Nancy. He brought out a fire (and a couple other things) in Nancy that had yet to be seen on the show, and she betrayed him so severely at the end of the most recent season that I don't see how he can let her live. He has injected some much-needed fire into the show, and I hope he makes a full comeback in Season 5 later this year.
For now, Bichir has been impressing audiences as a young Fidel Castro in Steven Soderbergh's CHE, working side by side with Ernesto 'Che' Guevara to plot out Cuba's future in the mid-1950s. Bichir is exhilarating to watch as the young, charming Castro in CHE, PART ONE (he makes a brief but significant appearance at the beginning of CHE, PART TWO). There's a power in his performance that nearly always overshadows Benecio del Toro's deliberately quieter and subtler performance as Guevara. As portrayed in Steven Soderbergh's epic two-part tale, Castro was the figurehead while Guevara got shit done, such as training and enforcement within the ranks.
Largely because I didn't know much about Bichir beyond CHE and "Weeds," I almost turned down this interview because I didn't know where to go once we'd exhausted those two subject. That might have been one of the dumber decision I'd ever made, because Bichir is a genuine thrill to talk to, and he doesn't hold back words or pull punches. His observations about what it takes to play an icon like Castro are as interesting as his discussions about working with Soderbergh. I just dug his energy, and I hope that comes though in this interview. Enjoy a man I'm sure we'll be hearing more from in the coming years on both sides of the border, Demián Bichir.
And for those of you not living in markets where CHE will play, either as two films or in the famed Roadhouse edition (as a single film with a 30-minute intermission), you will be able to catch Soderbergh's epic work on cable via On Demand beginning January 21.
Capone: How are you, Demián?
Demián Bichir: Good. Nice meeting you.
Capone: Good meeting you too. First off, fantastic job in the film.
DB: Thank you.
Capone: I'm also a huge "Weeds" fan, so I've got two or three questions on that front as well.
DB: You bet. Whatever you need.
Capone: When you play a character that is so well known in the world and one who has built a career on having such a strong personality, does that increase you anxiety about getting him right?
DB: Well, you know, you have just said what I've been saying for the last two hours. Yeah, that's the right answer. People ask me what it's like to play a character like Fidel, right? And that's exactly what I say. It has so many advantages that you can work with, because everyone knows him and because of the great, huge figure that he is. There are so many things that have been written about him and pictures and books and video and recordings and footage, all that. And those are all disadvantages as well, because that can work against you if you don't really nail it. For me, it's nothing that worries me or gets me nervous; it really excites me a lot. When the challenges grow in such a way, that's when you really, really have fun as an actor.
Capone: And you're dealing with Fidel at a time when people are less familiar with him and his personality is still taking shape.
DB: That's right, and you know what? It's funny because most of the times when I've been told that I'm exactly the way he was are by the older people, the 60-, 70-year-old people that knew him at that time, and they really remember that and they can believe the resemblance. That for me is a thrill because that's what you want to do with it. And the new generations, our generation, they really get it and they can relate to it. And if you ever get a chance to see footage from that time, it's funny to watch how both polished and unpolished he was. I'm just really happy with it.
Capone: In your mind, what was the key to getting this phase of Castro right?
DB: You know, I just read something that Steven Soderbergh said about me at a film festival in Morelia, Mexico. They asked him, "Why Demián? How did you come up with that idea?" And he said, "When I saw his tape, I thought 'This guy's not afraid of anything.'" And then I thought, man, I'm glad he saw that on my tape, because I was fucking shaking. [laughs] When you put yourself on tape or you go for an audition, you're so vulnerable and it's so hard. But they know that. And I guess that's the main thing you have to keep in mind. You can't have Fidel's dreams and ideals or go into the mountains and lead a revolution if you come across as afraid. How can you not be afraid if you're going to be working with Steven Soderbergh and Benecio del Toro, so that was part of the challenge too. I was not allowed to show them my fear.
Capone: What was your take on the relationship between Castro and Guevara?
DB: There are so many things that people thought about the way they were relating to each other, even rumors about them being…there were rumors that Fidel didn't really care too much for Che. Then when Che went to Bolivia, a huge rumor went around that Fidel killed Che, right? And that was so stupid, and that's how the second film begins when Fidel Castro reads to everyone in the world--especially the people in Cuba and to the Congress in Cuba and to whoever wanted to listen--the letter that Che wrote before he left for Bolivia. Steven wanted to begin the second film with that speech as Fidel reads that letter, and it's so emotional, so deep and overwhelming what he rights. And then all of those rumors went into the trash. They were not only great friends, but they were comrades. They admired each other, respected each other, and cared for each other. Even Fidel was a little reluctant when Che wanted to go right ahead and continue the dream of liberating the rest of Latin America. Fidel insisted it was not the right time to do it, and he actually wanted him to wait, but Che was in a hurry. "This can't wait." But Fidel thought, let's build something solid here in Cuba first. This is not the time. But Che wanted to do it, so Fidel did what he could to help him with whatever he needed in Bolivia.
Capone: I was really impressed with those scenes in the first film in that apartment with the group of Cuban mapping out Cuba's future basically. You forget that from such small beginnings, big results can come. Every movement starts somewhere.
DB: That's right. I love those scenes too. That's where the dream begins, where the journey begins. If you remember the scene, Che asks Fidel, "What do you have? How many men do you have? How many weapons, how much money?" And he didn't have shit. [Laughs] "We're working on it." That's the best of example of when you want something, you just put it in your head and there's no way it's not going to happen.
Capone: You were talking about Steven before, tell me about working with him. How much guidance did he actually give you in terms of your performance?
DB: He's so generous that he believes in your work in such a way that he respects a lot whatever you did to prepare. He expects you to be a professional actor and hopefully a gifted actor who can bring things to the table and the set. He welcomes that. He's everything but stubborn. And he believes in collaboration. Of course, if you're not ready or your ideas are wrong, then sorry, man, he's going to move on without you. [laughs]
Capone: Do you remember something specific he did or said that stuck with you?
DB: There was this scene we were shooting at night where Fidel had to give this speech to the troops, and there were 200 extras in front of me and all of my commandos, my commandantes, and Benecio was there, of course. And then he came to me and said--and nobody else knew this but Steven and I really--he said, I'm not going to cut. Just do your first take, and if you feel you're fine with it, that's it, that's all we need. But if you need another one, I won't cut. Just give me a look, and I'll keep rolling. So we did one take, we finished it, then there was total silence, like a dead silence in the middle of the jungle with 300 people including the crew. And then I turned to him and tell him with my eyes, "Let's do another one." So he goes back to his camera without cutting, and I start over again. And then after the second take, I looked at him again and said, "Another one." So I asked for three, and he blinks his eye as if to say, "Yeah, we need a third one. You're right." And then I looked at him after the third one as if to say, "That's it." And he agreed, and said "Cut." That was pretty intense.
Capone: Did you have a sense how the first film was going to be put together, the way it jumps back and forth between a couple different points in Che and Fidel's time together? Was that in the script or was that a surprise to you after the editing was completed?
DB: Well, the script was more or less like that. But Steven worked in many different ways to put this in here or one thing before that or after that. He has such a great, educated eye that he can do whatever he wants with the story and you're still going to love it. So he could do three or four different versions of it, and they're all going to work. But finally he comes out with this, which I think is brilliant. I saw the whole thing in France at the Cannes Film Festival, and it was amazing. We got a standing ovation for 7-10 minutes. I just couldn't be happier.
Capone: I remember a documentary I saw about Castro a while back that was illustrating the many ways he liked the prove to people that he was in control. And how those microphones he used to prefer--those thin microphones with the bulb at the end--he would constantly grab them and adjust them while he was speaking, even though they were fine. I don't know if you'd gotten that deep into researching him…
DB: Wow, yeah, absolutely. And you know what, it's a pity, because you know that scene we shot of him reaching Che's letter? Before reading the letter, he plays with the mics again, he adjusts them, and we shot that, but it's not in the film.
Capone: That's the only scene in the movie where we see him in front of microphones, and I was waiting for you to grab those things.
DB: That's right. Hopefully when the DVD comes out, Steven will put in the whole speech maybe. [laughs]
Capone: When I see him in a couple of days, I'm going to insist that he put that scene in for accuracy's sake.
DB: [laughs] You should tell him to do that because there is a point where I adjust…I'm impressed with your eye, because that's a huge part of his behavior, always playing and adjusting the microphones. He's not ever adjusting them because they are there and fine. And every time he did that, he was thinking about the next thing he was going to say. It's just a small pause. "Let's play with the mic, while I come up with the next thing to say." [laughs]
Capone: Before I let you go, I want to ask you a few "Weeds" questions. As they often do, the show left us with a killer cliffhanger.
DB: I know [laughs].
Capone: A pregnancy and a rat all in one fell swoop. Have you been given any clue where things are going to go from here, or will it be a surprise to you?
DB: That's a great question, because I've got no idea. I don't even know if I'm going back or not. I'm probably going to go back at least for one episode, where they kill me because she's pregnant with my kid or whatever. I don't exactly know where they want to go or what they want to do. I'm pretty sure I'm going back; the only thing I don't know is how many episodes or how the character is going to develop.
Capone: Do you know when production starts again?
DB: If they do it the same way they did it last time, they should be beginning between April and July, somewhere in there.
Capone: The show had never been quite as openly sexual, especially where Nancy was concerned, before your character was introduced…
DB: I know.
Capone: That had to be pretty flattering that you would inspire, both in the writers and in Mary-Louise Parker, so much heat.
DB: Yeah, I've been getting a lot of fan mail because of the nude scenes and the sex. It's always hard. Mary-Louise can be very intimidating in many ways, because she's beautiful and she's such a great actress too. But she is a sweet lady and so generous, and she makes the whole journey so easy and makes you feel so comfortable. Because you don't want to mess it up, not there, not with her. Everything runs smooth because of her.
Capone: You'd worked for quite a while in Mexican television before this. What do you find different about being a part of "Weeds"?
DB: The TV I did in Mexico was interesting because they were series about the reality of Mexico. We were talking about drug dealing and corrupt politicians and the corrupt church. And we were talking about the decent people too, and my character was a commandante, a lieutenant in the police. He was honest and tough and there, trying to do his part to change the whole thing. And the way we did that was pretty much like filmmaking, so we had a lot of time to do it. We had stedicams all the time, and a lot of equipment to do it the way we wanted to do it. It's pretty much the way "Weeds" is done. It is great the way those two experiences worked out for me, because they are these kind of projects that are made with heart and time and respect for each other's work, and taking care of the quality of the scripts.
Capone: So you play a police commander, the Mayor of Tijuana, and Castro. Someone must think you are exceptional at playing men of power.
DB: [laughs] I've definitely done that a couple of times. Maybe it's that fearless quality coming through again. I love big responsibilities on my shoulders; that's what I like as an actor. And I've been lucky because that's what I've been getting.
Capone: I'm being told our time is up. Thank you so much for talking to us.
DB: Thank you, thanks a lot. Anything you need, you call us.
-- Capone
capone@aintitcoolmail.com
-
+ Expand All
-
They killed, they tortured. It really bothers me that Hollywood tries to make these guys into heroes. In reality they were basically the Hitler and Goebbels of Central America.
-
Che and Castro at 1st were really great friends! After Castro decided he would turn CUBA in to a dictator-ship, CHE left and went on his way to bolivia! In which Castro did not help him one bit! That is the truth, and this actor seems like he was prepped at the communist camp for castro!
-
'anything you need, you call us'. the guy is OG
-
More like Stalin & Lenin. Genocide not one of their main aims, just violent revolution and overthrow of the incumbent regimes. Luckily there is a pretty long line of Central/South American leaders vying for the alternate titles of H&G. Not sure how the number of casualities and the extent of human suffering stack up against their European/Russian exemplars, but still good effort on their part. Then again, most military leaders have a lot more blood on their hands than their supporters admit and some of them have had pretty fantastic films. Almost as if Hollywood consistently lies to us about the merits of real (and fictional) killers. Come to think of it, not many Hollywood heroes aren't killers.
-
All three of you, huh?
-
Taken as two separate titles, The Argentine and The Guerilla are pretty solid movies. However, taken as a whole, I cannot help but think that Che is somewhat of a failure. For a four and a half hour movie about a hugely controversial figure, it is resoundingly incomplete. Che was pretty much Benicio del Toro as Jesus Christ. How do you produce four and a half hours of Benicio and barely touch any aspect of him that makes him reviled by so many people around the world?
-
that last "Benicio" should be "Che"
-
... and your t-shirt isn't cool.
-
While Lenin and Stalin might a better comparison than Hitler & Goebbels, I don’t think either one is really that applicable. I think they best comparison to them is the Robert E. Lee and Jefferson Davis of their time. And I say that because while they may have admirable traits, and they might have been individually brave and held firm convictions in what they were doing, they were fighting for an evil and immoral system.
And that also explains why people still love Castro and Che; it is the same reason people still love the Confederate generals and make excuses for their actions. Why? It isn’t so much that many Southerners are so racist that they can’t recognize how evil the Confederacy was (although some are), it is just the simple fact that the Confederates were fighting for their side versus a different group. It is Tribalism 101: cheer for those like you, and hope that they change or maintain the status quo so your group can move up or stay at the top of the pecking order - simple as that. And that is the same with Castro and Che for so many people in Latin America. They see Castro and Che as the champions of the indigenous people of Latin America and as defenders against Yankee hegemony, never mind the fact they created a government just as oppressive or as repressive as created by European colonialist or even Batista. All that mattered was the illusion that somehow our side is in charge.
-
...As someone who is center-left in his political views, I could never see why liberals would like Che. Any opponent of freedom of speech, due process, civil liberties and who believed that homosexuals should be killed is no hero of liberalism.
-
I'm going to download it or buy it ilegally so that they don't receive a dime from me for it. I hate those hollywood types with their pretensions and ideals of socialism and communism while they're obsessed with having money and living large, it's very easy to be a socialist from that position. So fuck them, don't let them make money since they don't like it.
-
when the good guys do it
-
If I wanted hours of dialogue about battle plans, I'd read about military history.
When I go to see a film, I expect, you know, a film. -
Has turned into the political version of the kids' table. In other words, a douchebag drop pile of morons who are condemning a film they haven't seen. Soderbergh's film is not a love letter, it wouldn't be Soderbergh film if it was. And yes, the executions carried out by the revolutionary courts are directly addressed in Part One on the floor of the UN. And, morons, the film was not financed by a Hollywood studio, hence, your tired "evil Hollywood leftists" rants are particularly stupid. And, I have to know, do you guys honestly think life was that great under Batista? Castro may be a swine, but Batista was destined to be overthrown.
-
that must have been nice.
-
Must. Resist. Busting. Harry's. Balls. Over. "Che". Must. Respect. HeadGeek. Must---ah, fuck it. I think the fact that NOBODY from BNAT posted a review of "Che" speaks for itself. Nobody was awake for the whole thing. Father Geek, however, did include it in his Top Ten of 2008 list. I can't offer an opinion because I didn't last for the entire film, but I did see the entire first 2 1/2 hours. I'll just not recommend trying to watch this after already watching 24 hours of film previously. From the silent 5 minute opening showing us every location we're about to see on a map like a Power Point Presentation to the endless marching through the jungle, I never learned anything about Che internally. What makes him tick? I don't know. It felt like a History Channel miniseries more than a movie. It did, however, feel very much like a documentary. It feels like you're watching real life instead of written scenes, and many critics will applaud it for that. I just wish, like most of the AICN staff, I could have just said "I have the screener at home on dvd. I'll watch it in the comfort of my house when I'm better rested." Because now, to me, "Che" will always be a painful memory of trying to stay awake.
-
...does not excuse Che and Castro's wanton cruelty and wholesale violations of human rights.
-
Please consider the following post to be pre-emptive: There seems to be some confusion and that someone had to clarify that as a center-leftist, they did not think of either Che nor Castro as heroes, exemplifies the debate. These people were little more than gangsters and thugs replacing another set of...gangsters and thugs (surprising I know). What disgusts me though is how long this repugnant folk hero myth has endured around a man responsible for forcibly executing political prisoners in death camps and dying for all intents and purposes in a petty rivalry between him and his partner/leader in crime, Fidel Castro. Much like House of Saddam or the dreadful God's Favorite (about Manuel Noriega) some of the most wretched human beings are portrayed as machiavellian, but nonetheless semi-sympathetic characters, who essentially all some type of re-cast Corleones in far less superior Godfather ripoffs. The supposed intrigue, the betrayal and of course the obligatory American bash...what's not to like, right? Understanding that these people are anti-democratic leftists is not propaganda or spin. Understanding these people are anti-democratic leftists is MINIMALLY OBSERVANT. So for godsakes, burn those tee shirts, shave, get a job and maybe when you're out here in the big bad real world, off mommy and daddy's dole, no longer at the university of your choice, I'll be happy to pay attention to any rants some of you had in the waiting (No offense to anyone above.)
-
Somehow I get the feeling you wouldn't get so fired up about Cheney and Bush condoning the torturing of people. Again, your opinion is invalidated by the fact you clearly have not seen the film. Also, your demonizing of Noriega is odd, considering that we once had him on the CIA payroll. After all, we promote democracy. And Saddam was awful in butchering Kurds with chemical weapons during the Iran-Iraq War. Did Reagan cease aid immediately after? Nope. But yet it's all "evil leftists". Nothing more hypocritical than criticizing ranters with a rant. And by the way, the US backed Batista. Did this endear the Cubans to us? Just like with the backing of the Shah in Iran. But it seems you have you head in the sand in Billo land.
-
to communism.
-
and thanksgiving in the name of all the murdered "native americans"
-
you just dont understand..
how Che represents a ray of hope in the lifes of millions of faithless minimum wage workers.
in the beginning it was just all about regaining control of their own destinys... what happened later was just nasty U turn.
Che fought for freedom; communism was just the name someone labelled it after. -
I know everything there is to know about Che ok! The man might of been a ray of hope to some in latin americe, those who were communist! Or the poor wage workers! Yet the thing people dont realize is that the workers who would fight because they were poor, were still poor after the reveloution! Every communist uses the same excuse, but in the end, it is the same end! The country does not better its self, history has proven this right! & anyone who thinks CHE is a saint needs to be strung up and hanged from a TREE! I knew cubans who were in camps because of CHE, and fled to america because of him as well! America is the most free country in the world, yet you have the most stupid citizens in world! Who support communist, socialism..etc... When you have never ever been in a situation, of that sort! Hollywood trys to glorify CHE! Makes me sick, and it makes me sick that people knock america! What because of the Native Americans, at least america is able to admit that it committed those crimes! Cuba still denies the the millions it had killed! People just understand when you speak, and read a FUCKING book!
-
they were still poor after the revolution, but alteast the money their work poduces doesnt go to someone whose main interest is taking it out the coutry as soon as they can.
Batista was no different than Maximilian of Absburg, or even the whole spanish colonialism, bleeding the indigenous people out of their hopes of a future.
atleast after revolution they won the right to work for their own country, rather than someone else's interest..
the word communism is way too demonized, what you people associate with communism is nothin more than a higher level of economic dictatorship that has nothing to do with marx's ideal.
-
"anyone who thinks CHE is a saint needs to be strung up and hanged from a TREE!" Che defended the use of executions, and, apparently, so do you. Sheesh. I bet you have a framed picture of Pinochet at home.
-
MadC! They were poor and the only people who become rich under communism in Cuba was Fidel! He doesnt care about the Cuban people, all the wealth goes to him. As far as Marx's his ideals are good on paper! Yet no one in the history or actual communism leadership or goverment has ever put the true meaning to use! MadC for you to think of Che, as a person of value, means you un-educated! Go live in Cuba for a year, come back and then tell me what you think of communism. You spoiled american twat, or whatever republic your from! As far as SGT.ISUCKACOCKSTEINER, yeah Che defended execution...with out trial. Even though I think you are a CockSucker I would still allow you to be tried by your peers, fuckface!
-
Anything that makes a barky little tool like laraz angrily burst a crucial artery can't be all bad.
Comparisons between Cuba and the US are pointless...comparisons of Cuba and Haiti or Guatemala are what leaves Batista's apologists spluttering. -
I just want people to read a fucking book and realize what they are talking about! BurnHollywood, you seem like a fag! Anyone who would sport a t-shirt or ideology of someone, without knowing what they were or are about is what is the word you would use TOOL! Yeah america has done some bad things, but none as bad as cube or most of the world for that matter! So shut the fuck up, go suck a cock like you do! & tell your lover to fuck you in the ass! As far as anyone else who wants to say anything else, ducks a dick and two balls! Peace, im out!
-
Oh yeah Capone, you need to interview better actors! Not communist loving bastards! Yet you probably are one! If not, you talk and act like one! If your not one you sure are a pussy and cant interview worth a shit! Before you even say anything if anything at all, eat shit and die! You dick sucking communist!
-
He is upset because his mother is fucking a communist.
-
All kidding aside, you have a disturbing obsession with oral copulation.
-
Hey anal spit! Are you a real Sgt or do you just bullshit! Because you sound like you belong Fuck-off magazine! What are you and Capone butt-buddies! Or do you guys just really like that communist blood pumping through each others asses! I havent figured it out yet! Let me know soon please! Otherwise Suck a dick and two balls! Go listen to your dam Culture Club albums!
& no I dont have anything against gay people!
I just have something against in-the clost homosexual communist like yourselfs! I always get the last word bitch! Remember that! Till next argument, shut the fuck up! Sit the hell down! & dont get back up! Cause I come punching like ALI! You communist whore rag! -
The vile and venom spat at each other here is down right laughable. Neither side is going to win or convert each other if your entire argument is summed up by "suck my cock" or "you're a fag!"
Having said that, I will state that I have never criticized the movie per say, just pointed out how I view Che & Castro and how I think those who are fans of him are misguided. Has the United States down bad things? Yes. Was Batista a bad leader? Yes. But just because we say yes to these questions doesn’t mean we can’t raise any more questions or criticize.
The US has long interfered with other countries and nations, trying to shape the world in what would be our best interest. But you what? Every country does it or tries to do it, just very few countries have as much power or influence as us that they can do it so effectively. I am not trying to make excuses for the U.S., just stating a fact. I mean Cuba supported Marxist and Communist forces throughout Latin America, as well as sending Cuban troops to Angola and Ethiopia. He denounced the Czech rebellion to gain support from the Soviet Union, and to have them help bail out the Cuban economy. He did that to help his countries interest and spread his influence at the expense of letting another country determine their own destiny, just like how we here in the US sometimes ally with a dictator or support a rebel side for our own self-interest. I might disagree with whom my country supports, but at least we can criticize our government’s involvement. You can’t in Cuba.
Secondly, while Batista was an asshole and a dick, it still doesn’t make Fidel and Che any better. The Polish people suffered under Nazi rule, doesn’t mean they liked the Soviet’s rule that much better. Same with the Communist after Batista: sure the islands profits and resources were no longer going to fatten the pockets of foreigners and colonialist, now they were going to enlarge the bank accounts of a small group of party loyalist. Fidel wasn’t liberating the Cuba people; he was just exchanging one dictator for another. Only this time this one would present himself as a man of the people and a defender of the little guy. But if Fidel were really interested in creating a free society, he would have stepped down from office years ago, like George Washington and Nelson Mandela did after they served their terms as leaders. No, Fidel was always out not to help his fellow Cubans but to put him at the top of the totem pole.
Same with Che, whose entire goal was just to start revolution after revolution, for the sake of revolution, often ending with failure. In fact, Che-inspired revolutions often have the practical result of reinforcing brutal militarism. I look at Che as the Latin American version of General George Custer: once a symbol of bravery and looked upon as the epitome of what an American (or Latin American for Che) should be, but now that the years have put some distance between us and the birth of his legend we can see the incompetent, narcissistic jerk he really was.
-
is a classic self-loather. He is also fun to get a rise out of.
-
All bizarre verbal jousting matches on this TB aside, I found this interesting quote from "Che" scribe Peter Buchman, which more or less sums up why the film is interesting and why it should have been made: "The fact that he put his own ass on the line in Cuba, he put his own ass on the line in Bolivia-where do we see that? There's a lot of what Che believes I don't agree with, I'm not a communist, but there is a commitment there I respect. I think it's fascinating when you see one individual affect history."
I see to recall T.E. Lawrence shouting, "Take No Prisoners!" I seem to recall Patton having a disturbing love of war. Now, while I think Che has little in common with Hitler(with Robespierre you might have a case), my dislike of the Nazi leader to not hamper my enjoyment of "Downfall" by any stretch of the imagination. History is fascinating, whether its Che Guevara triumphing over a repressive dictator and overlooking the repressive nature of the government set up thereafter, or GIs wasting civilians at My Lai. You may not approve of the actions involved, to deny that they are of interest would be an absurd claim to make. -
I hope you don't suck either of your two dad's cocks with that mouth.
-
Of course I do!~
Readers Talkback
User Login
Top Talkbacks
- Whitney Houston 1963 - 2012 -- 171 total posts 169 posts
- AVENGERS enemy revealed as pink boardgame pieces... You might suffer some form of elation... SPOILERS!!! -- 157 total posts 111 posts
- There's a STAR TREK video game that is going to lead into JJ's STAR TREK 2 apparently... -- 138 total posts 75 posts
- Here's The Red Band Trailer For Drafthouse Films' THE FP! -- 67 total posts 67 posts
- To Commemorate The 3D Release Of STAR WARS EPISODE I: THE PHANTOM MENACE, George Lucas Wants You To Know...Greedo Shoots First!! -- 479 total posts 62 posts
- New JUDGE DREDD post production footage pops up -- 59 total posts 59 posts
- Does ‘SNL’ Rhyme With ‘Deschanel’?? Learn Which SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE Vet Hosts After Sexy Zooey!! -- 62 total posts 59 posts
- HANNA's Saoirse Ronan to boss around seven little people -- 48 total posts 45 posts
- Friday Brings SWEEPS DAY NINE!! Gab Here About Tonight’s FRINGE!! Plus Einstein on TIM, Wiig On PORTLANDIA, MAHER, CLONE, GIFTED, GRIMM, SPARTACUS, SUPERNATURAL, GOLD RUSH And More!! -- 116 total posts 32 posts
- SPACE 2099!! -- 181 total posts 30 posts