Logo

Cool News

ROSEMARY'S BABY Thwarts Platinum Dunes' Remake Efforts!!

Published at:  Dec 24, 2008 7:30:19 AM CST


Merrick here...


Platinum Dune's mission to remake/re-imagine classic horror films seems to work out okay at the box office, but Geeks traditionally don't appreciate the prospect too much.

And, of all the titles they've targeted thus far, PD's remake of Roman Polanski's ROSEMARY'S BABY drew some of the most intense dissent.

However, according to producers Brad Fuller and Andrew Form, seems there's reason to rejoice...at least for now.

Andrew: We are not doing “Rosemary’s Baby”.

Brad: No, no. I mean… “Rosemary’s Baby” was announced and it’s like a little bit like we’re taking about with Freddy. We went down that road and we even talked to the best writers in town and it feels like it might not be do-able. We couldn’t’ come up with something where it felt like it was relevant and we could add something to it other than what it was so we’re now not going to be doing that film.


...per THIS DISCUSSION with Collider.

Alas, the interview does indicate the Martin Campbell's reamke of THE BIRDS is still "on"...









    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 7:30:44 AM CST

    No Thanks

    by georgieboy

    The original wasn't all that anyway.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 7:31:33 AM CST

    Oh wait, good

    by georgieboy

    The original movie sucked. Good for them.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 7:52:41 AM CST

    Brad Fuller and Andrew Form

    by kwisatzhaderach

    What a couple of dicks.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 7:55:15 AM CST

    rosemary's baby...

    by zom-bot.com

    didn't have room for explosions, so bay backed out

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 8:02:25 AM CST

    whatever

    by charlie_allnut

    They can make as many of these as they want, I still won't see them.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 8:03:20 AM CST

    Budgies

    by yubinit

    Birds remake already been done in Resident Evil: Apocalypse… or at least enough of The Birds that was interesting. Betcha they get all environmentally preachy that pesticides or some such muck explains their behavior. Now adays they just GOT to have some explanation.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 8:16:46 AM CST

    Praise Jeebus

    by frongbak

    Keep your greedy little paws off RB, Bay you fucknut.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 8:17:57 AM CST

    Maybe 2009 will be the year execs wake up

    by ghostwood

    and realize every film doesn't have to be remade or reimagined.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 8:18:21 AM CST

    Creature from the Black Lagoon

    by frongbak

    That would be a good remake for PD. They should bring back the monster movie format. Leave serial killers to degenerates like Zombie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 8:22:08 AM CST

    Don't worry

    by flyingcircus

    There are still many more properties to bleed dry, and then you can start again at the top of that list in a few years.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 8:25:37 AM CST

    The wave is the best film of 2008!

    by irc-hollywood

  • Dec 24, 2008 8:26:13 AM CST

    guys, you have the get the trailer for "9" up here NOW

    by magic rat

    I just saw it at Firstshowing.net and the thing is mind-blowing.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 8:28:53 AM CST

    There was a remake of The Birds already

    by ricarleite

    Why bother!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 8:39:33 AM CST

    MICHELLE DUGGAR'S BABIES!!!!!!!

    by alice 13

    shooting for a hundred scary little sequels!!!!!!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 9:04:13 AM CST

    "the best writers in town..."

    by shepard wong

    I'd be curious to see who these clowns think are the best writers in the business.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 9:07:12 AM CST

    Oh, thank fuck for that...

    by 24200124

    That is all I wanted to say. That and here's to the death of the pointless remakes and the Schlossberg/Friedman "Movie"s.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 9:09:51 AM CST

    Whoops.

    by 24200124

    That's Friedberg/Seltzer, I meant...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 9:29:40 AM CST

    The Birds Remake

    by crow3711

    Is going to be awful. The original is good for what it is, but no one today is going to be the least interested or scared by birds attacking. It's just fucking stupid. Naomi Watts running from birds is just not exciting. There's no way to make it exciting either, unless they do some ridiculous plot filler like make the birds vampire bats or radioactive mutant woodpeckers that eat brains. Somethings gotta give. What a bad idea.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 9:37:06 AM CST

    "reimagine or reinvent"

    by justyhakubi

    I.e. we couldn't figure out a way to whore out the title. Our no talent hack writers aren't good enough compliment the original... we know it would suck monkey balls. Thank God for small miracles. Maybe some real studio will pick up the license and run with it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 9:38:37 AM CST

    I"m not advocating a remake

    by bloo

    but I was watching TCM's Van Johnson tribute last night (did we get a Van Johnson obit...fuck Dec was a depressing month for deaths)--anyways, the first film they showed was IN THE GOOD OLD SUMMERTIME which is a remake of THE LITTLE SHOP AROUND THE CORNER (later remade as YOU'VE GOT MAIL)...and Robert Osborune mentioned that ITGOS was made only like 6, or 7 years after TLSARC...so these turnaround remakes aren't that new of an idea...the new ones just suck harder

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 9:49:44 AM CST

    PRAISE SATAN!!!

    by cannabis holocaust

  • Dec 24, 2008 10:00:02 AM CST

    Wasn't it "All hail satan"?

    by thebloop

    He has his father's eyes.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 10:18:58 AM CST

    The Year is One and God is Done!

    by seth_brundle

    That is the best Christmas present I have ever received since my company gave me a severance slip instead of a holiday bonus! There are certain films that are timeless and should not be re-made, and Rosemary's Baby is one of them. It's also one of the most faithful to the original Ira Levin novel. But rest assured Merrick, I'll be in line for Martin Campbell's "reamke" of The Birds!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 10:19:22 AM CST

    Its been stated ad nauseum

    by skimn

    Hitchcock remade the Man Who Knew Too Much, DeMille remade The Ten Comandments, Ben Hur had at least 1 remake..remakes are nothing new. The old adage of "old wine in new bottles". It is the constant, repetitive nature that the remakes have taken lately, not in just the occasional Prom Night or such, but big budget films like Day The Earth Stood Still. Hearing of remake after remake does get tiring, when the studios reduce their annual output.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 10:29:57 AM CST

    And not reading the original story of The Birds,

    by skimn

    I don't know how much Hitchcock swayed from the original. If the remake hews to the original (ala Carpenter's The Thing), a remake does make sense. If its just to spruce up attack scenes digitally, then what's the use? Despite Hitchcock's glaring use of rear screen, the Al Whitlock matte work is still beautiful, and the attck scenes at the gas station and attic hold up still today as models of editing and effects.Again, who knows? I'd definately state Naomi Watts is a better actress than Tippi Hendren.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 10:53:29 AM CST

    The demon baby probably would have went on a killing spree.

    by mike_d

    about 3/4 into the movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 11:17:11 AM CST

    what a laugable response from platinum dunes

    by max404

    first that 'best writers in town line' and then 'We couldn’t’ come up with something where it felt like it was relevant and we could add something to it other than what it was so we’re now not going to be doing that film.' like this has EVER EVER been the reason to make a remake. the only thing that counts is whether a buck can be made

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 11:20:23 AM CST

    If *I* were going to redo Rosemary's Baby

    by magic rat

    The baby would be the son of the President of the United States, who made a deal with Satan to get elected.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 11:22:01 AM CST

    make the baby grow up to be Nick Nolte.....

    by dannyglovers_dickblood

  • Dec 24, 2008 11:39:40 AM CST

    Damn, I want all Movies remade

    by barmat

    I think there should be NO original content. The studios should only be allowed to make remakes.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 11:42:13 AM CST

    Satan's Spermbank...

    by alonzo mosely

    That would have been my pitch. Satan donates his demon seed to a sperm bank, and some hollow career woman with no time for a man or family previously, suddenly gets the ticking biological clock and decides she suddenly has to have a kid, but is too much of a bitch to get a man.
    Eventually it turns into a heart-felt drama as Satan tries to reclaim custody as she is such a negative influence on his son, however Satan is no match for her corporate maneuvering and loses, the film ends with the kid crying as he is dragged off to his daily therapy session...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 11:55:00 AM CST

    Cassavetes digin' tunnels!

    by ericthebeef

    No remake can ever capture the greatness of John Cassavetes laying pipe into Mia Farrow.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 11:55:40 AM CST

    Don't have a problem with The Birds...

    by eustisclay

    ... it was a lesser Hitch anyway. And you can make birds scary, depends on the script and the direction. You can make anything scary if it's done right(okay, maybe not giant killer rabbits,see Night of the Lepus). And sure they have been doing remakes forever,but there seems to be a huge amount of them coming. And at least when they did them in the 30s 40s etc they didn't have access to the originals like they do now. I say stay away from the classics and redo some less than successful ones like The Dunwich Horror or Prophecy(giant mutant bear).

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 12:21:34 PM CST

    Isn't that the truth about all remakes?

    by geraldbeans

    Since when has the reality he stated ever stopped them before? Rosemary's Baby was a great great movie. Even though I hate all remakes, I don't see why you couldn't do it today and it still be a great movie? It's a simple screenplay that would work again. The rape scene's a little touchy but hey, it's the devil. That's what the devil does, rape people.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 12:29:54 PM CST

    Magic Rat

    by johnny smith

    Always thought that would be a better concept for another version of The Omen.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 12:30:52 PM CST

    Fuck Platinum Dunes

    by gungan slayer

    I'm fucking tired of them cranking out remakes. Enough is enough

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 12:34:37 PM CST

    just for the record...

    by i87d

    Rosemary's Baby was originally based on a book. If some purist crybaby had his way about an "uneeded" adaptation back in the 70s, we wouldn't have that movie to jizz over today. just sayin... the second movie ever made was a remake of the first movie ever made. come up with a more original complaint, please :)

    Reply to Talkback

  • ...hot teens & cool FX into the story.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 1:26:05 PM CST

    The BEST writers? yeah right, the best 10 bucks can buy

    by stormwatcher

    and all the McDonald Menuaire meals they can eat. Seriously, has Micheal Bay or anyone with him even met a writer whose ever even been considered good?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 1:30:23 PM CST

    Thank you, AiCN

    by jimmay

    I wrote a critical comment in the Fast and Furious poster talkback criticizing the site for not posting this news while they devoted bandwith to a movie no one gives a crap about. Either you listened, or you're just a little slow to do the right thing, either way, thank you.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 2:03:40 PM CST

    Pretty sad

    by phool2056

    that in fact the most cheering movie news is often what the monsters AREN'T remaking.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 3:19:28 PM CST

    the baby grew up to be dick cheney

    by bacci40

    there...its relevant....these fucks should not be working in hollywood...they should be picking up my dry cleaning

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 3:24:42 PM CST

    These Producers are actually my biggest heroes right now

    by jimmay

    They had the foresight and integrity to take a good hard look at their prospects, realize the project was going to end up sucking, and mercifully kill the deal. Contrast this with Michael Bay, who's never met a script he didn't like. In comparison, these guys deserve statues.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 3:54:09 PM CST

    Ebert reviews The Spirit

    by melvin_pelvis

    Gives it a proper rogering: http://tinyurl.com/7dhdfv
    Someone
    Put
    Miller
    On
    a
    Bus
    Headed
    Out
    Of
    Town!
    Today!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 3:56:15 PM CST

    Hey! Isn't it time for another

    by melvin_pelvis

    A Star is Born remake?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 4:05:10 PM CST

    Don't heap praise on these guys

    by geraldbeans

    The only question here is whether the movie can make money. If they don't think it can make money, they're not going to remake it. It has nothing to do with all this integrity bullshit. "Oh, we realize that you can't do it right." HAHAHAHHA. Are you kidding me? Hollywood is about MAKING MONEY. That's the only thing that ever has and ever will determine their decisions. "Integrity". Give me a break.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 4:13:51 PM CST

    Seriously? geraldbeans?

    by jimmay

    You don't think it would have made money? After morons flocked to the Texas Chainsaw and Hills Have Eyes remakes, I find it very unlikely they decided it wouldn't make money. All they had to do was bring an obnoxious, jump-cutting shaky cam director on board, change the storyline to include some gory, pointless killings, throw in an all-under 25 cast of underwear models, provide some obligatory nudity, and they would have locked in the brainless under 18 Friday night group date crowd. With horror movies, there's rarely any consideration in the industry for whether it will make money.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 4:46:06 PM CST

    What they meant to say was...

    by ryanesta

    They couldn't figure out how to turn it into a $100 million dollar domestically grossing movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 4:49:32 PM CST

    Remake The Exorcist.

    by gilkuliehe

    Come on, motherfuckers. Do it. I dare ya. I DOUBLE DARE YA MOTHERFUCKERS!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 7:53:23 PM CST

    They're still remaking A Nightmare On Elm Street

    by thepilgrim

    So Fuck Em! BD's report on the Thing Prequel sounds more like a Remake than a Prequel. Horror fans are getting fucked in the ass! When you give an OK Pass To one Film Like Friday The 13th. shit Like This Happens. Friday Begot Nightmare. Just as TCM Begot Halloween, and Amityville Begot TCM. Makes Me Sick. Now the thing and nightmare are up for Rape. Sucks to be an 80's horror kid right now. It really does...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 24, 2008 11:14:27 PM CST

    AWWWWWWWSOME

    by the amazing g

    maybe there's hope for Hollywood yet!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 25, 2008 12:30:54 AM CST

    I'd see a Rosemary's Baby remake

    by burgerking

    Would be a modern take on it, don't see that as a bad thing.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 25, 2008 2:34:28 AM CST

    Mike Bay's Platinum Dunes + Rosemary's Baby remake =

    by thebearovingian

    = AWESOME.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 25, 2008 4:14:01 AM CST

    Why in my day...

    by thegreatwhatzit

    We'd strip these cheap opportunists down to their huly-huly skirts and make 'em perform at the Girls' Gym Class. Then we'd set fire to their skirts. Good 'ole days. If these assholes ever rape CURSE OF THE DEMON, they'd better hire stooges to start their cars in the morning. No, not me; I prefer inhaling Christmas holly with a shot of Brandy. Ho-ho-ho

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 25, 2008 9:53:57 AM CST

    This would never work.

    by ben addiction

    There's simply nothing to be improved upon. Rosemary's Baby is one of the few absolutely perfect films, so there would be no point but to make some quick bucks. For those of you who think a remake would work here's why it wouldn't - it would be impossible to come up with a better Minnie Castevete than Ruth Gordon. It was a genius comedic performance in a horror film and I can't think of anyone who could do that part but her.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 25, 2008 11:02:34 AM CST

    So now people are only doing remakes...

    by dougmckenzie

    if they can "add" something to the original? Wow I was so naive. I thought it was only about using existing established IPs, with a built in audience, as easy cash cows. How could I be so wrong?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 25, 2008 5:29:36 PM CST

    If AICN had been around in the 1950s

    by catlettuce4

    One can easily imagine the TB'ers bitching and moaning about the nerve of that upstart British film company, Hammer, remaking Universal's classic "Frankenstein" and "Dracula" with the "no talent stringbean" Christopher Lee and "balding nobody" Peter Cushing.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 26, 2008 9:37:22 PM CST

    Kill the Suspiria Remake!

    by miss 45

    First of all in response, Peter Cushing and Christopher Lee were great, but nowadays the roles would be filled by CW actors, so not the same thing.

    Second of all, one down. LET'S KILL THE SUSPIRIA REMAKE!

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback