Hey, everyone. “Moriarty” here. So... have you heard that Spike Jonze is making a film out of Maurice Sendak’s classic children’s book WHERE THE WILD THINGS ARE? If you forgot, you’re not to blame. The film was originally announced a few years ago, and then set for an October ’08 release, and then... well... that didn’t happen. And it didn’t happen for a variety of reasons, which all basically boil down to “it wasn’t ready.” I saw the film a while back. I saw it with the request that I not review it at that point, and that was fine. I was curious as could be about it, and what I saw was a fascinating rough draft, a bold and striking reflection of the book, more like an articulation of it. It was completely unlike any other adaptation of this sort of material, something akin to THE 5000 FINGERS OF DR. T in the way it seemed unafraid to freak you out. It was nowhere near done, though. And the Wild Things themselves were completely unrendered in the film I saw, meaning entire characters had yet to be truly defined. Since then, I’ve read the same rumors you guys have online and elsewhere about the creative struggles on the film behind the scenes. Devin Faraci’s been the best and most constant voice of advocacy about it at CHUD, a squeaky wheel trying to make sure the film we finally see is something akin to the film that Spike set out to make. The one voice I haven’t heard, at any point in the process so far, has been that of Spike Jonze. I’m not surprised. He’s never been the most accessible artist, and why should he be? He’s not making giant corporate movies like a superhero flick or a video game adaptation, so he’s not used to being beholden to the hype machine. He’s always made very personal films, and with WHERE THE WILD THINGS ARE, it’s safe to say, even at this early stage, that he’s done the same thing again. The difference, of course, is that this is a property with that built-in audience, and they’re curious. Verrrrrrry. When I recently interviewed Charlie Kaufman, I told him how much I enjoyed the rough cut of the film that I saw. Kaufman demurred that he did what he described as “pretty much nothing” on the film, with Dave Eggers being the primary writer who worked with Spike on it. When I told him how much I liked it and mentioned a few things in particular, he told me that he thought Spike was pretty happy with the film right now and just getting started on the finishing technical work. I took that as a very good sign, and the first concrete thing anyone’s really heard since Gary Goetzman told AICN and CHUD on the CITY OF EMBER Comic-Con train that he felt like the film was moving forward, completely at the pace that Spike wanted it to. But I didn’t really think about it until Spike’s publicist contacted me to say that he heard I’d seen the film, and he was interested in talking about it. I met him at his offices right after lunch, and we sat down with his editor, Eric Zumbrunnen, to talk. We jumped right into it as soon as I walked in the room, and I asked him if he’d seen much of BENJAMIN BUTTON yet, knowing he and Fincher were both part of the heyday of Propaganda Films. He immediately lit up as he tried to describe the audacious effects work in the first part of the film. He was already mid-answer by the time I turned on my recorder and set it on the couch between us:
Spike Jonze: [The character in the first hour of BENJAMIN BUTTON]’s created in post, basically, with Brad inspiring it. Fincher totally invented his own technique, and it’s insane. Like whenever you hear there’s a CG character, I’m always a little skeptical, but I never even noticed it. It’s just this totally compelling, really charming character, you know, because he’s like a little boy inside an old man’s body, and the performance is amazing.
Moriarty: BENJAMIN BUTTON is very much like WHERE THE WILD THIGNS ARE in that they’re adaptations that were never approached in the typical Hollywood way, from the beginning of the process of adapting them. You’ve gone at it in a way that is really unlike any other production like this I’ve ever heard of.
Spike Jonze: Yup.
Moriarty: Is it the fact that you guys came out of the commercial background and the video background and things where you’d been able to experiment that freed you up to think about effects this way? Because so often, I think guys get really rigid about, you know, you do it the ILM way, you get into the pipeline, and you do certain things a certain sort of way.
Spike Jonze: Yeah, we were talking about that recently. We’re working with this company, Framestore, it’s an effects company, and in dealing with them it’s so different from dealing with an effects company ten years ago because effects companies are so much more humble. And I think it’s partially because they used to hold the keys to the secret chest of magic or whatever, and a lot of directors who come up now through videos, it’s not as separate, doing effects; it’s just part of telling the story. And I do think with a lot of directors – and not even just like Robert Rodriguez or whoever, Fincher, Chris Cunningham, Gondry – it’s like effects are just one of the tools, as opposed to “Here’s a script that needs to be filmed, how do we execute this thing?” It’s more just one of the tools you use to create a feeling that you want the movie or story to feel like.
Moriarty: I still talk to some guys who I think treat it almost like they’d treat their second unit or stunt work, where they just hand it off to somebody. They just do what they’re told in terms of getting it onscreen. But you guys really seem like you break the mold of how these things are done when you approach it, and from the ground up you kind of build new ways of getting to these ideas.
Spike Jonze: Yeah, I think this one I just wanted to... from the beginning, I wanted it to feel a certain way. I wanted it to feel “real,” or not-real because it’s not “real,” I wanted it to feel like... like when I was a kid, and I would play with my Star Wars action figures, or read Maurice’s books and imagine me being Mickey in IN THE NIGHT KITCHEN, or whatever it was... it felt like it was everything, you know? It’s like your imagination is so convincing to yourself that... you’re there, you’re in it. And I wanted this movie to take it as seriously as kids take their imagination and not, like, fantasy it up. So I think it just started from that feeling, that it could feel like you were there with them, like Max was there with them, and not just in some fantasy movie.
Moriarty: I love that it’s not on a soundstage at all, that you just went to... is it New Zealand for the most part?
Spike Jonze: It’s actually Melbourne, right outside of Melbourne.
Moriarty: It’s phenomenal. It feels so rough, and organic, and there’s nothing about it that feels like a soundstage, or a backdrop, or a green screen. At no point do you believe that you’re on an artificial environment.
Spike Jonze: That’s great. Yeah, that was our aim, and it definitely was not easy. It made it a lot harder to take a little boy, these guys in suits, doing it all on camera. You know, so if they throw each other, it’s all on cables, and if we’re doing that, we’re doing it all on location. So it was definitely not the easiest way, but I tried not to think about that while I was conceiving it and just sort of conceive what would feel right. And I love the designs in the books. When I was a kid they were sort of seared into my subconscious – or unconscious. [to Eric] Which one would it be?
Eric Zumbrunnen: Both.
Spike Jonze: Both? It would be seared in both. [Laughs] So I wanted to maintain the charm and feeling, because in the book the characters are so cuddly, but also dangerous. So I wanted to maintain the charm of Maurice’s characters, but then make them feel like they lived in this environment, and give them faces and eyes that could emote in the complexity of what the script needed them to be. And so that’s sort of where the designs came from. Also, I wanted him to be able to hug them, to be able to touch them and hug them, so...
Moriarty: I love how you didn’t have to sit around waiting for the Henson guys to get things to work, which is a separate art form, and you were just able to focus on the kid’s performance and not have fifteen tech guys trying to hit a cue at the same time. I think that must be insanity, trying to do that.
Spike Jonze: We were trying to make it as organic as possible, but even then... but the guys in the suits, the actors in the suits were incredible, and they really worked hard. I didn’t want performances of the suits or the animation to be like traditional puppetry or animation where everything’s sort of over-indicated, everything’s like “Wow wow WOW! Hey Max, how you doing!” It’s like they think everything has to be sold. So we shot the whole movie with the voice actors on a soundstage, and we just shot it like a workshop. It looked like some sort of ‘70s experimental theatre or something like that, because it was just this blank soundstage with shag carpeting, and they were all in their socks so the sound was muted. It was just a really dead soundstage, sound-wise, and they could just act it out. We’d take foam cubes and build little trees or huts or whatever, and then we’d just workshop the scene like I would do with a live-action movie, and just find what the scene is about through blocking and improvising dialogue. And out of that stuff, then... because puppeteering and animation isn’t spontaneous in any way, but I wanted the movie to feel alive and immediate. I knew I could get that with Max, but I wanted the wild things also to have that kind of performance, so by doing that with the actors where everything is spontaneous, the guys in the suits would feed off of that. They would watch the tapes; we’d do playback for them so they’d be acting along to James Gandolfini’s voice in these speakers. And then the guy in the suit would just “feel” what Gandolfini did in his body and his shoulders, so after playback, when he starts to go, “Well... I don’t know, Max,” or whatever the line was, every little head movement would be intentional, because Gandolfini did everything with intention. They’re actors, so they aren’t even really thinking about it. With puppeteering, you have to decide what the intention is and then you have to figure out how to communicate it, because every puppet works differently. So nothing’s immediate or spontaneous about that form. But with actors, it’s just something that happens between two or more of them. Somebody will say something, and the other will react in a way that just feels true in that moment. So we used that as the sort of basis for their performances and for the animation. It was like working backwards, finding what I wanted it to feel like and then creating a process.
Moriarty: Well the spontaneity works. I love the scene where they have the dirt clod war, because it almost felt to me like JACKASS. Like it’s got that kind of energy to it, where they’re aggressive and they’re big, and a little scary, and you feel like you could get hurt when they start going crazy around each other. But it also feels really loose, like they just have a giant dirt war fight. There’s nothing kind of ‘set piece’ about it. It just turns into this random bit of chaos. I liked that... I thought the energy was really great between them.
Spike Jonze: Yeah. The process now is just so second nature to us, but we spent a long time after writing that script trying to figure out how to do it. Eric’s been on the movie for two and a half years, because he edited the voice shoot two years ago.
Moriarty: That’s an unusually long gig for an editor.
Spike Jonze: Yeah, we spent months just working on that voice shoot before we even shot a frame of the film. Then we took that to Australia.
Moriarty: Now was that with this Max?
Spike Jonze: No, he wasn’t in there because we didn’t want him to do the whole movie twice. We wanted everything to be spontaneous, so in that version we just used Catherine Keener. Me and her would basically switch off being Max with all the other actors. So I’d be Max and work a scene from inside, or Keener would be Max and I’d be able to stand outside the scene watching it. I can’t remember what we wore... we had this fur...
Eric Zumbrunnen: It was like a hat with ears on it.
Spike Jonze: Yeah, it was this hat with ears on it. [Laughs] It was almost like a raccoon-skin hat with ears that Keener found and gave to me for Christmas one year. So it was like whoever had that hat on was Max. But so yeah, with Max we didn’t want him to rehearse much, we just wanted him to show up on set and deal with whatever was happening. A lot of the energy on set was creating stuff off-camera for him to react to and engage in. That was like a whole movie into itself, the off-camera stuff for Max.
Moriarty: I think directing kids is one of those things that you kind of judge a director on. It’s a different discipline than almost anything else. I think with kids’ performances, I really hate mannered performances where you feel like the kid’s being coached, especially now that my boy is getting a little older, and he’s a wild animal, literally.
Spike Jonze: How old is he?
Moriarty: He’s three now, three and a half. He’s a wild animal, and like watching the way he reasons and the way he does things, and asking him to explain why he did something, it’s awesome. It’s such a crazy head space, and this kid felt to me very organic, very real, and there are things that you see play on him over the course of the film that I don’t know how you’d fake. Like he just strikes me as a real kid reacting to something, not someone going through lines and going through scenes. And that’s a hard thing to get to, so that’s the thing I think I walked away from most impressed by the first time.
Spike Jonze: Yeah, he’s an amazing kid.
Moriarty: And he’s taken a lot of shit on… I don’t know if it was another parent or something, but the IMDb boards kind of got really crazy and ugly and weird for a little while. It felt like a parent of a kid from the audition process who didn’t get cast, and just went after this kid who did. And that’s a weird thing to even have to deal with as you’re in the middle of production.
Spike Jonze: The Internet already has this element to it that has a shit-talking aspect to it, but to put that on a 9-year-old kid is totally insane.
Moriarty: That’s what I really couldn’t believe. It seemed kind of outrageous that before this performance has even been cut, before you’re done with it and know what you’ve put together, here’s somebody attacking this 9-year-old, and all their frustrations, anxieties, whatever, they’ve heaped on this poor kid. It seemed like a really unfair thing to pick on, especially because you didn’t cut it yet, or hadn’t when this was going on, and so much of that is in the choices you’re gonna make.
Spike Jonze: Yeah. And I think also – I mean I don’t know what they said, but...
Moriarty: It just got really strange. And I felt really bad for the kid. But I think that what I saw in December already kind of indicated that it’s not a typical kid performance.
Spike Jonze: So was there stuff on the Internet before that screening in December?
Moriarty: I believe so, yeah. It started early.
Eric Zumbrunnen: Yeah, one of our guys here showed me that stuff, and it was crazy because they were saying “Well I saw cuts of this in Australia!” And that’s a total lie, because there was nothing cut in Australia. But you can’t go on there and go “Hey, blah blah blah, I’m editing this picture and you don’t know what you’re talking about,” because anybody could say that.
Spike Jonze: Yeah, but before December, nobody could have written anything about it.
Moriarty: That’s why it felt like it was somebody who didn’t get something and was determined to just trash talk the kid who did. And that’s such a bizarre thing to do to a kid.
Spike Jonze: Yeah.
Moriarty: I can’t tell you the mail we get about this or the interest level there is. I was just doing a set visit in London and it came up in conversation, so I said I’d seen a cut and people go rabid when they hear that. Because I think so many people have such a deep attachment to the book and are so passionate about it. It’s the first book I bought my kid. It’s like you look at the things on the shelf and go “Well, he’s gotta have that.” [Laughs] So it’s crazy, the emotion that people have invested in the material.
Spike Jonze: At that screening you went to, there was something that was really interesting. This lady was our age and she brought a kid, or a couple kids, I don’t know, but she said that the book was something her parents got for her. She was like “When our parents got it for us, they didn’t really know what it meant. But we knew what it meant.” And I think somehow that book, and also Maurice’s work just taps into feelings kids have.

And I know that I wouldn’t have been able to say this when I was a kid, but looking back, there was something honest about it, and as a kid you’re given so much stuff that’s not honest and is just sort of pandering or whatever that when you are given something that’s talking to you directly, you just sit up straight and connect to it and love it.
I remember with Maurice’s stuff or even WHERE DID I COME FROM? Is that what it was called?

I just remember always going back to that book because of how few things talk to you like that.


Moriarty: Well, it’s completely frank about it, and the cartooning style got the harder things past you, so you’re able to grapple with some of those bigger ideas. What I loved about Maurice’s book and still love about it is that it’s about emotional states, and what a crazy thing it is to write about for children... how sometimes you have these emotions that are just so big you can’t control them. And a big part of getting older is learning how to handle these things, and the wild things really are part of being a kid. You know, sometimes you just get overwhelmed and everything seems crazy, and you feel like that. And I love that his book is scary when you’re a kid. And I love watching my kid be scared reading it. He gets into it, and he really gets scared of the wild things, and I think there’s something essential in it for kids. Like we need to get scared sometimes, and we need to feel that kind of abandon of the wild rumpus. I think your film is daunting for a kid. I think the wild things, because of their physicality and because they are so big, are kind of intimidating, and I can imagine some kids will be really freaked out by them. But if they weren’t, it’s not WHERE THE WILD THINGS ARE.
Spike Jonze: Yeah, it doesn’t take it seriously. And I think from the beginning, I told the studio, “I don’t think this is gonna be a movie for four-year-olds.” And I think they said “Oh, okay,” but I think that when they saw it, that’s another... you know, that’s something else. How old do you think your son would be before you show him the movie?
Moriarty: It depends. We’re really having the debate now about what’s appropriate for him and it’s an ongoing thing, like you look at stuff and you judge stuff and there’ve been a few times where I think I may have misjudged. I would say five or six... I’d feel comfortable with him seeing it and getting it. But I think younger than that would be too much, because I think they are physically so intimidating.
Spike Jonze: And also the way it’s photographed, I guess.
Moriarty: Even the opening stuff that’s at home is kind of upsetting... that whole “permanent damage” idea, with Keener freaking out at him...
Spike Jonze: Yeah. It’s funny, that line actually isn’t in there anymore. That’s a scene we took out, and then we couldn’t figure out how to get that line back in there. But I think that even though the line’s gone, that idea’s still there. One of the things I’ve wanted to do since that version... I think the script is so wordy that I slowly just tried to trust that there were certain feelings in the movie that didn’t need dialogue, and that we didn’t have to have dialogue saying what the movie is about so much as the movie just being about it. So we slowly just tried to find places where we could strip the dialogue back and let the feeling of the photography and the mood and the performances do the work.
Moriarty: Who’s scoring it for you?
Spike Jonze: Karen O from the Yeah Yeah Yeahs. She did some of the score and is doing some of the score. Her and Carter Burwell are sort of doing it together.
Moriarty: Wow. That’s a cool collaboration.
Spike Jonze: Yeah, it’s... yeah. It’s working out well. Karen’s sort of writing more, not trying to go score to picture so much as she is just writing themes. There’s a couple of cues in there from before, but she’s done more since then.
Moriarty: You’re about a year out now?
Spike Jonze: Yeah. We just locked picture about three weeks ago, and we’ll probably finish all the effects by, like, May or so. Then we mix in May and we have our dates in October, so...
Moriarty: Wow. That’s a crazy long process, man.
Spike Jonze: Yeah, it’s so long and it’s so complicated. When I was writing it, I kind of knew it was complicated, but I kind of just had to be willfully naïve about that to not get bogged down in it. But it’s hard. I think by the time we got to Australia and were shooting it, the realities of what we were trying to do set in. And it was just sort of exhausting and insane to be out on these cliffs in southern Australia where there’s 60 mph winds, and you’ve got all these guys in suits, and you’ve got this little boy who’s freezing. We had to abandon locations because of storms, and when the winds would get too high we’d have to evacuate and try to figure out what to do with the rest of the day while waiting for the storms to pass. So it was just total insanity.
Moriarty: Still, that’s got to all inform...
Spike Jonze: I think you feel it probably, yeah.
Moriarty: I really felt like the location was scary. It’s a scary place to end up, and you feel that in the movie. It certainly has that sort of desolate, end-of-the-world vibe, like you don’t feel like there’s any place else but this.
Spike Jonze: Cool, that’s great. I think it started from what Maurice said in the beginning. One of the things I was worried about is that the book is just so beloved to so many people. And as I started to have ideas for it I was worried that I was just making what it means to me, and what the book triggers in me from when I was a kid. And I’d be worried that other people were gonna be disappointed, because it’s like adapting a poem. It can mean so much to so many different people. And Maurice was very insistent that that’s all I had to do... just make what it was to me, just to make something personal and make something that takes kids seriously and doesn’t pander to them. He told me that when his book came out, it was considered dangerous. It was panned by critics and child psychologists and librarians, because it wasn’t how kids were talked to. And it took like only two years after the book was out that kids started finding it in the libraries, and basically kids discovered it and made it what it is. And now it’s 40 years later and it’s a classic. So he said you just have to make something according to your own instinct.
Moriarty: You met him originally when you almost did HAROLD AND THE PURPLE CRAYON?
Spike Jonze: Yeah, I was producing that.
Moriarty: I thought that adaptation, the [Michael] Tolkin script I read, I really wanted to see. I really loved what you guys were doing. And that seemed like a wild choice when you guys were first talking about it, because you’re talking about a small, fairly slight piece of material, but you guys found a real emotional hook to that. I thought it was a very powerful script.
Spike Jonze: Yeah, I did too, I was excited about it. I mean, in a way, it’s probably good that I didn’t do it, because I didn’t exactly know what I was doing as well, in terms of...
Moriarty: Well it was ambitious.
Spike Jonze: It was so ambitious, yeah, in terms of effects and animation, and to make all those pieces tell one story. And I was only 24 then, so I just think I didn’t have that much experience, but I also didn’t have experience with studios. We worked on it for like a year and a half, and bit by bit, it just got away from what I had initially wanted to do. When it finally got the plug pulled on it I found myself oddly relieved… depressed too, and sad, but there was a part of me that was relieved. And I realized later that I was relieved because it had gotten away from what I wanted to do. I think I’m much more aware of that now. It’s commercials too. Ad agencies are always the same way. They always just want to pick it away from what your initial idea was, and that one just luckily didn’t happen, I think. I mean, it’s a bummer it didn’t happen, but I’m also glad it didn’t happen in a compromised way, because it just moves away from what you want by like a millimeter a day, and then you look up a year later, and it’s miles away from what you wanted.
Moriarty: So that’s where you and Maurice sort of learned a rapport with each other. I mean, he obviously must have trusted you when he gave you this, because this really is the cornerstone of his reputation.
Spike Jonze: Yeah. They’d been trying to make it a movie for a while, and over the years since then, like over the last ten years probably, he would just talk to me about it, like “You know, we’re trying to do WHERE THE WILD THINGS ARE.” And I remember a few times I would get an idea and talk to him about it, but I always just looked at the book and was like, “It seems so perfect. What plot are you gonna add to this thing that doesn’t feel totally tacked-on?”
Moriarty: Right. And the worst case scenario of that is something like CAT IN THE HAT, where there’s all these Hollywood instincts, and there has to be a villain, and you have to do all these things to expand it to feature length, and then suddenly whatever charm it originally had kind of evaporates. Like that is the Hollywood version of how you do that wrong. So, yeah, it is kind of intimidating to think you have to keep it that simple, and yet have it be a feature.
Spike Jonze: But I think like what you said that I realized is one of the things that has a lot of room to develop out of the book is who the wild things are. And once I realized that the wild things were sort of about wild emotions, then I suddenly felt like I had a way into it. I felt like I was following that idea, because wild emotions are scary because they’re unpredictable, either in yourself or people that you’re close to, and as a kid you don’t know how to process them. You just take them at face value. And it’s very hard to know, when you’re close to somebody, where you stop and that person starts. It becomes very blurred, even as an adult, but as a kid those relationships are just that much more overwhelming and confusing and upsetting. So I think once I realized that, I didn’t know what I was gonna write, but I at least knew that there was something to write there.
Moriarty: It makes sense. Like I’ve seen how my kid reacts if you lose control of your anger. They’re little batteries, they soak it up and then it comes back out in the craziest of ways. You don’t know how and you don’t know when, but it’s not gonna be the same coming out as it was going in. You learn real quick to be careful about what you do and express in front of them, and how. That’s something that I don’t know if I’ve ever seen someone try to talk about in film. Like I think we try and make kids into saints in movies, and we kind of smooth off the rough edges, and it’s just so much more interesting to see a real kid, and to see how kids try and process the world.
Spike Jonze: And I think that’s what freaked the studio out about the movie too. It wasn’t a studio film for kids, or it wasn’t a traditional film about kids. We didn’t have like a Movie Kid in our movie, or a Movie Performance in a Movie Kid world. We had a real kid and a real world, and I think that’s sort of where our problem was. In the end they realized the movie is what it is, and there’s no real way to... it’s sort of like they were expecting a boy and I gave birth to a girl. [Laughs] So they just needed their time to sort that out and figure out how they were going to learn to love their new daughter.
Moriarty: It’s been interesting, and because there’s been a lot of silence on Warner’s end of things, it’s caused a lot of speculation and conversation and I think anxiety from film fans. They’re like, “Oh my god, am I gonna get to see THAT movie?” So when Charlie told me that you guys seemed really happy with where you were, I just was relieved.
Spike Jonze: Yeah. It just took a lot longer. And that was hard, but you know, in the end I got to make my movie. And with the version you saw, I was trying to get the money to do the pick-ups I wanted to do, and it just took a lot longer to finish it.
Eric Zumbrunnen: Well we were right in the middle of the strike.
Moriarty: Yeah, ugly timing.
Spike Jonze: But yeah, somebody got a petition going, was it you guys?
Moriarty: It wasn’t us who organized it, but I saw it go by.
Spike Jonze: Yeah, so somebody got a petition going. It was actually Michel Gondry who I heard it from, and he got it from Bjork, who signed it, so there were some pretty interesting names on there.
Moriarty: But that just shows you how much expectation there is. I think the material has such a huge fanbase, and almost everybody who writes about film right now, or at least the peers I know, were raised on this. It’s an essential piece of childhood. So I think the expectations are definitely there, and the curiosity.
Spike Jonze: The weird thing is now there’s more awareness about it. I mean, I guess there always was because the book is indelibly imprinted into so many people’s brains at a young age, but I almost worry that because it’s taking so long there’s this expectation of it being some epic, but you’ve seen it.
Moriarty: It’s very intimate. But hopefully if you know the book, since the book is what, 82 words? It’s very small in scale, but still big in terms of the ideas it deals with.
Spike Jonze: Yeah.
Moriarty: I love that the only real image that’s out there so far is still that one that MTV broke online from that licensing show.
Spike Jonze: What is that?
Moriarty: Just Max running through the forest and the single leg coming in. What’s great about that is that it’s created this kind of aura of mystery about what the wild things are themselves.
Spike Jonze: Yeah, we really didn’t want to release any images, but they made us put one out there.
Moriarty: It’s the perfect image because it’s so suggestive and still shows you almost nothing. And in a way, you really couldn’t show these things unfinished because until now they weren’t really there yet.
Spike Jonze: We have great stills. [to Eric] Do you have those stills?
Eric Zumbrunnen: They were downloading them.
Spike Jonze: Oh okay. I wish we had some great shots, but we don’t really have them effects-wise. But we do have these photoshopped versions where you see them with their expressions. I think they’re downloading them right now... I wanted to show them to you. But you just see the difference from the static faces. The static faces are really beautiful, but they’re not specific in any way. But every now and then in the movie, they’ll kind of line up with a feeling, and it’s weird how well it works without anything.
Moriarty: I think it’s because they’re so close to the Sendak designs to begin with. That’s the one thing in the version I saw that I almost didn’t mind. I knew that there was more work to be done, and it would be something very different emotionally, but even just looking at them, they’re so beautiful, and Maurice’s designs are so unique that you can just kind of stare at Carol’s face. And Gandolfini’s voice is perfect for Carol. I’ve always thought that he had this kind of weird big baby thing in his voice anyway, like it’s a little bit of the mush mouth. But that’s part of what makes him so appealing, that the big guy thing isn’t daunting with him, because he’s got that weird kind of baby thing.
Spike Jonze: Yeah, there’s something so endearing about him. And he’s so emotionally immediate, and he’s like a kid in that way. Like kids don’t mask their emotions.
Moriarty: I don’t get the feeling with Gandolfini that there’s much confusion about what’s going on inside of him, do you? At least in the way he comes across. And it’s a really cool choice as a voice actor. Like I don’t know if I ever would have thought of him as a Wild Thing or as a lead in this kind of a film, but it’s right on.
Spike Jonze: Well, all his emotions are right there. That was why I wanted him, because there’s no separation between what’s happening on the outside and what he’s feeling.
[They showed me a series of stills on one of Eric’s screens, panoramic shots of the Melbourne locations, with wire rigs and giant suits and a huge crew. Dazzling.
The Wild Things, since I haven’t described them to you yet, each stand about eight feet high, it looks like, or at least the larger ones do. They’re very, very close to the original Sendak drawings.

That’s not exactly what Carol looks like in the film, but it’s a good starting point in imagining him.
None of the Wild Things have articulated faces on-set, though. They’re just one expression all the time. That’s one of the boldest choices Spike made in shooting the picture. Since most of the film was shot handheld by Lance Acord, every single shot with a Wild Thing in it is going to have to be animated, and that’s going to be incredibly complex as a rotoscoping gig.
But just looking at those stills, I could see how nightmarish the shoot could have been if you’d added even one more variable onto that location. It may be a Herculean task ahead in post production for Framestore, but if they hadn’t done this, there might not be a film for them to be doing post-production on.]
