|
Published on Friday, November 7, 2008 - 12:05pm |
|
More On That John Boorman WIZARD OF OZ Project!! Concept Art Online & More...
Merrick here...
An AICN reader took the time to call our attention to the ActionSynthese website; ActionSynthese being the company with whom John Boorman is currently working on a CGI adaptation of L. Frank Baum's THE WONDERFUL WIZARD OF OZ (details HERE).
Even though Boorman's association with the project was just announced in yesterday's Variety, he's apparently been involved with the project for some time (per our reader's communication). Long enough to develop concept art like this...
... and post the following mission statement on ActionSynthese's site:
Based upon the original work by Franck L. Baum, The Wizard of Oz is a literary and cinematographic milestone which animated cinema must approach with respect. Why should we make an animated version of this story at all? Given the technical limitations of the day, and the demands of live action, the iconic MGM film could only engage with a fraction of the novel. Animation will allow up to explore the magical fantasy of the book and bring the array of strange and frightening creatures to life.
Therefore my objective in recreating the universe of the land of Oz is to realise the glories of Franck Baum’s novel. The Wizard of Oz is first and foremost a fairytale telling the story of a young girl who has lost her parents and lives in the countryside with her aunt and her uncle but dreams of another reality, of escape, of finding friends who will compensate for the loss of her parents.
Dorothy’s journey through the land of Oz relates a child’s coming of age, the transition from childhood to adulthood. Dorothy learns that she must put away childsish things, take responsibility, and become an adult. She is the only child in the land of Oz, and she has to understand that adults live in an ambiguous world in which the border between the good and the bad is often blurred.
In the original work, the handling of the female characters has been subjected to tremendous care. All the strong and powerful characters are women: Dorothy, the Witch, Glinda. Whereas males are deficient: the Wizard of Oz, the Tin Man, the Lion, the Scarecrow.
Nature also plays a key role in this magical world. It possesses a soul and is inhabited by mysterious forces. This nature isn’t tamed like ours, it belongs to the witches and the wizards. Nature is accordingly handled in the script as a genuine character.
Eventually, the harmony of the film will rest on the atmosphere, for which light is crucial. Today’s animated films generally tend to be over lit. These delightful and touching characters, Dorothy’s companions, represent aspects of the human condition. I will set them in a magical landscape that contains deep shadows and dark mysterious places which reminds us of the hazards we all face as we make our way through the world.
Such a setting will allow Dorothy to remain this unique character who has been through a century of literature and cinema history and is still able to seduce generations of viewers.
John Boorman
You can find this message, as well as several pieces of concept art from the project, by clicking the image below...

I notice there's a tag on the site indicating "View Teaser", but it's password restricted. (Merrick sniffles). Sure would be cool to get a look at that teaser. Very cool...
Huge thanks to the dude who took the time to send in the message.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reader Talkback
old dead eyes is back by thinboyslim. | Nov 7th, 2008 11:16:50 AM | First? by TheBigLebowsky | Nov 7th, 2008 11:17:39 AM | Close but no cigar... by TheBigLebowsky | Nov 7th, 2008 11:18:08 AM | Whoa by Herewereyouwish | Nov 7th, 2008 11:18:08 AM | I'm Sold by Corterville | Nov 7th, 2008 11:21:14 AM | Sounds Good by itstherudy | Nov 7th, 2008 11:26:55 AM | Whole lotta meh. by TheJake | Nov 7th, 2008 11:27:20 AM | Too Scarecrowey... by finky089 | Nov 7th, 2008 11:32:38 AM | Synthetic people just look
creepy by TimBenzedrine | Nov 7th, 2008 11:34:32 AM | Dear heavens, their other
"production project:"
involves... by JackPumpkinhead | Nov 7th, 2008 11:39:00 AM | I love the MGM Judy Garland
version by Ray Gamma | Nov 7th, 2008 11:40:49 AM | Synthetic people and the
uncanny valley by enderandrew | Nov 7th, 2008 12:11:16 PM | JOhn Boorman... by emeraldboy | Nov 7th, 2008 12:12:40 PM | John Boorman's heart favors
this project by Shub-Wankalot | Nov 7th, 2008 12:34:06 PM | Three words: THE DARK
CRYSTAL... by wowsah156 | Nov 7th, 2008 12:52:14 PM | Return to Oz captured the mood
best. by theycallmemrglass | Nov 7th, 2008 12:57:08 PM | Where's the John Woo Wizard of
Oz project? by thebearovingian | Nov 7th, 2008 12:58:20 PM | Yeah but... by p0llk4t | Nov 7th, 2008 01:03:26 PM | Yeah the production design of
Return to Oz is fantastic by half vader | Nov 7th, 2008 01:05:49 PM | Sounds like a nice contrast to
Excalibur.. by Octaveaeon | Nov 7th, 2008 01:15:28 PM | His analysis of the book
should be required... by zinc_chameleon | Nov 7th, 2008 01:36:17 PM | this should be like Burton's
Wonderland by oisin5199 | Nov 7th, 2008 01:46:44 PM | Like the painting of
Dorothy/Scarecrow by Subtlety | Nov 7th, 2008 01:59:19 PM | About Burton's Wonderland by caltsoudas | Nov 7th, 2008 01:59:34 PM | looks very Wyeth to me by vaterite | Nov 7th, 2008 02:01:44 PM | friend is renegade... by massolit | Nov 7th, 2008 02:07:19 PM | more art here: by BadMrWonka | Nov 7th, 2008 02:08:55 PM | "Heavily cliched"?? by Dreamwriter | Nov 7th, 2008 02:12:13 PM | Too cute looking by BeatsMe | Nov 7th, 2008 02:25:13 PM | That scarecrow sure got a
purdy mouth by Darthkrusty | Nov 7th, 2008 02:33:00 PM | Dorothy is FAR from the only
child in Oz. by geekzapoppin | Nov 7th, 2008 02:34:14 PM | BadMrWonka by Rando Calrisian | Nov 7th, 2008 02:37:53 PM | Looks fucking dumb! by DRACULA_WANTS_THE_AMULET | Nov 7th, 2008 03:37:39 PM | I would trust Zemeckis or
Jackson with this by performingmonkey | Nov 7th, 2008 04:02:26 PM | Rando Calrisian by BadMrWonka | Nov 7th, 2008 05:08:05 PM | CG like it's 1999 by Rubiks Doob | Nov 7th, 2008 06:05:09 PM | i think it looks interesting by brandon11 | Nov 7th, 2008 06:53:55 PM | toooooo by icen9ne | Nov 7th, 2008 08:28:13 PM | AAAAAAAAAGGGGHHHH!!!!! by canucklehead | Nov 7th, 2008 09:31:48 PM | Trust Boorman - he's no fool by palimpsest | Nov 8th, 2008 12:28:04 AM | Could be decent by bswise | Nov 8th, 2008 01:44:12 AM | Here my question... by Seany-Wan | Nov 8th, 2008 06:16:45 AM | Just watch "Return to Oz"
instead... by Stalin vs Predator | Nov 8th, 2008 06:41:00 AM | Go with the book illustrations
indeed! by alienindisguise | Nov 8th, 2008 08:02:11 AM | ugh by carneguisada | Nov 8th, 2008 10:12:59 AM | I'll Only Watch This by thelordofhell | Nov 8th, 2008 12:39:43 PM | Holy fuck based on five pieces
of CONCEPT ART this will suck by Larry Sellers | Nov 8th, 2008 12:43:38 PM | oisin5199 by VoldemortWearsPrada | Nov 8th, 2008 04:25:05 PM | Weight Loss Voodoo? by LeftFoot | Nov 8th, 2008 06:53:51 PM | Anyone interested in reading
some "4400" fan fiction? by Leafar the Lost | Nov 8th, 2008 07:33:50 PM | Just do fucking WICKED
already... by BurnHollywood | Nov 8th, 2008 10:20:35 PM | Should have based it on
Denslow's art. This will suck. by Uncle Stan | Nov 9th, 2008 10:15:10 AM | That concept art fills me with
a little hope. by Royston Lodge | Nov 10th, 2008 12:54:53 PM | If you want to know how dumb
hollywood can be... by emeraldboy | Nov 10th, 2008 02:38:35 PM | if they can put in the scene
that MGM yanked.. by emeraldboy | Nov 10th, 2008 02:42:09 PM | Looks a little plain!? by FILMFUNK | Nov 10th, 2008 03:38:21 PM | will it have hanging midgets? by The Amazing G | Nov 11th, 2008 01:37:55 AM |
|
|