Ain't It Cool News (www.aintitcool.com)
Movie News

Paramount begins to release images from JJ's STAR TREK - pick up new Entertainment Weekly!

Hey folks, Harry here... The cover of the new Entertainment Weekly has Kirk & Spock v.2.0 on the cover doing their best "strike a pose" - but inside the issue is the real treats - actual shots from the film. It is strange, it feels like a million years ago when JJ showed me the brief snippets of STAR TREK that he was willing to share, but looking at the below still of Sylar as SPOCK - I can't help but remember just how perfect he was in the scenes I saw. Quinto nailed the Nimoy thing. Had the eyebrow gymnastics down and the slight wry irony of observing these Humans down perfectly. I just can't wait to see the next trailer which will really give everyone an idea of what this film is. HOWEVER, for you STAR TREK junkies - pick up the new ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY, as it's the first step to lifting the veil of secrecy off the direction of this beloved franchise. Click the below image to embiggen...





Click Here For Eric Bana! Click For The Crew Click for the Bridge Click for Kirk on Ice Click for a bad day on the USS Kelvin

Readers Talkback
comments powered by Disqus
    + Expand All
  • Oct. 15, 2008, 3:57 p.m. CST

    Of all the sols I've known, his was the most...human

    by Dingleberry Jones

    FIRST!

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 3:57 p.m. CST

    Sweet!!!

    by GeekySciFiAnimeFreak

    YAY!

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 3:58 p.m. CST

    Or souls, however you want to spell it.

    by Dingleberry Jones

    Funny, Khan is on right now while I'm typing this. Oh wait, I mean KHAAAAAAAAAAAN!!!!!!!!! *face shaking violently*

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 3:59 p.m. CST

    Spock sure looks angry for a Vulcan?

    by TakeItEasyMon

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4 p.m. CST

    I also thought he was showing too much emotion.

    by FookU

    Maybe I'm just being nitpicky.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:03 p.m. CST

    Yup. That was my IMMEDIATE first thought too.

    by JethroBodine

    Too much emotion.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:03 p.m. CST

    Sylar!!

    by TheJake

    He cut out Spock's brain!! Hopefully he can bring back a little bit of Vulcan knowledge to HEROES!!

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:03 p.m. CST

    Does Spock have to choke a bitch?

    by Heckles

    Man, that looks dope. Cannot wait. I will make sure to flip through this magazine briefly at Borders and not buy it.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:04 p.m. CST

    he's about to cut open Kirk's head

    by McDee

    and steal his libido

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:06 p.m. CST

    When does the new issue come out?

    by Heckles

    Hopefully soon...

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:06 p.m. CST

    Why is he angry

    by eric haislar

    Spock would never do that.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:07 p.m. CST

    He looks...

    by ROBRAM89

    ...like Sylar. Expression and all. But still, perfect. Also, Spock was never exactly the LEAST emotional Vulcan.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:07 p.m. CST

    The good of the many outweighs the good of the few....or the one

    by BackRiverCatfish

    He looks more like teenage Spock from Wrath of Khan.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:09 p.m. CST

    EW Cover

    by Heckles

    Is on the Trek movie website.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:09 p.m. CST

    I think I read Spock at this stage is still struggling...

    by blackmantis

    ...to contain his human emotions. More so than in TOS.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:10 p.m. CST

    I like the costume

    by MattmanReturns

    They managed to be true to the original but update it enough to keep it from looking cheesy.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:11 p.m. CST

    What's with the SCALES nowdays?

    by JethroBodine

    Why does every recent re-do of classic characters, especially really iconic characters have to have a costume with a scaly appearance? Spock's print pattern in that pic definately has the new "trendy" scaly look, as did Supes in Superman Returns, and so did Spidey in all 3 Spiderman movies. Seriously. What's with the fuckin scales? Enough already!

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:11 p.m. CST

    Spock's angry because..

    by andyny29

    he is going thru pon fahr the Vulcan mating ritual!

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:12 p.m. CST

    THE GIRLS BETTER HAVE SHORT SKIRTS!

    by Earthquake WestCoast

    I want to see short skirts on all the federation women! They better not go all gay and political correct. Btw....this film is going to fail. Why release it a week after wolverine and a week before all those other summer blockbusters? Haven't they learned anything from Speed Racer?

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:13 p.m. CST

    JJ

    by SPECTRE007

    So.... There's Polar Bears in this, right?

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:14 p.m. CST

    O I C

    by JethroBodine

    ...ahh, it's a little Starfleet Badge pattern. Still looks scaly. Just like all the rest.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:14 p.m. CST

    Spock is Half Human

    by grievenom

    Maybe he hasn't yet learned to control his human side yet. He was always so careful in TOS to hide his human emotions. Maybe when he was younger, he hand't quite mastered it yet.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:19 p.m. CST

    Looks cool! Anyone notice...

    by jimmy_009

    ...the solution to bringing what would be cheesy old fashion costumes in into 21st century filmmaking is to add waffling? Spiderman, Superman, now Trek.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:20 p.m. CST

    Yeah... I'm not paying for EW. It sucks.

    by ZeroCorpse

    Lamest magazine ever.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:22 p.m. CST

    Those old trek shirts will be in style.

    by skydemon

    I love it! :)

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:24 p.m. CST

    Way ahead of you there Jimmy_009

    by JethroBodine

    :-) I concur.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:25 p.m. CST

    WTF?

    by m.dung

    The Starfleet insignia. Is Spock stationed on a Barber college ship at the beginning of this?

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:26 p.m. CST

    COVER HERE! it's lame.

    by eric haislar

    http://img.trekmovie.com/images/ew1015trekcover.jpg

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:28 p.m. CST

    JethroBodine

    by mr.brownstone

    I had the same thought.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:29 p.m. CST

    erichaislar

    by mr.brownstone

    Agreed. That's the best promo shot they had for the cover? It looks ridiculous.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:29 p.m. CST

    That "boy" is not Kirk

    by eric haislar

    I am sorry. He looks 12.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:35 p.m. CST

    Logic, logic, logic. Logic is the beginning of wisdom, not the e

    by Limulus Polyphemus

    Since we don't know the context of the scene it is illogical to conclude that Spock is acting out of character. The character of Spock showed emotions several times during the course of original series, and in most of the films as well.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:37 p.m. CST

    not the e....nd

    by Limulus Polyphemus

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:37 p.m. CST

    Original Star Trek

    by enderandrew

    Frankly, I never really got into TOS Trek that much and don't really care. However, I expect an entertaining movie that holds very little sacred when it comes to TOS canon.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:38 p.m. CST

    Spock's emotion...

    by MOTHdevil

    would be consistent with TOS pilot which in theory takes place after this movie. This is assuming, of course, that the makers of said movie are actually that interested in continuity porn. More likely it's just canonical inconsistency that just happens to actually be consistent. Kudos!

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:40 p.m. CST

    This looks like Mr Bean.

    by JackPumpkinhead

    "Stay there"...

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:41 p.m. CST

    So, i guess no one has ever watched star tre before...

    by menstrual_blitz

    ...Spock gets pissed constantly. Sure, he has to be sprayed by an alien flower. or begin de-evolving to an earlier savage Vulcan state, or, like some one above mentioned, he could be going through pan far (every 7 years), or he could have a slimy plastic creature on his neck, or he could have that perspiration drunk virus, or Kirk pretended that Spock killed him again and this time he's pissed instead of happy to see him. Or maybe some other young Vulcan disappointed him and sided with a cabal of rouge federation and Klingon's. Spock is full of emotion, that's the point. He just has to suppress it all the time, so there are a number of things in the universe that can set the guy off. You guys are unbelievably petty, the pictures JUST came out!!!

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:44 p.m. CST

    I guess it's spelled Pon Farr...

    by menstrual_blitz

    ...and how can you tell how bad the new kirk is, before seeing him play the part? Just wait until next year to start complaining.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:46 p.m. CST

    Dear god, that cover is horrible...

    by Strabo

    Star Trek 90210 indeed. I have almost zero interest in seeing this movie full of bland neophytes.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:47 p.m. CST

    PREQUEL V'GER must appear!

    by Stereotypical Evil Archer

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:52 p.m. CST

    Bridge crew & Nero

    by Heckles

    Trek movie site is blowing up with more images. Dope shit.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:55 p.m. CST

    SPOCK IS ANGRY??? WTF???

    by ominus

    ok i know he is half human/half vulcan and not that he hasnt expressed anger before,but come on the photo here shows him more like a berserk man ready to snap the others guy neck,rathen an angry tvulcan who at least try to control this negative emotion.wtf?

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:56 p.m. CST

    I'm a straight guy but...

    by cameron1975willi

    ..that guy playing young Kirk is one good-looking dude. but then Shatner was a bit of a stud too, back in the day. I say; give the guy a chance. I've already heard that he pulls off what is almost an impossible task.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:56 p.m. CST

    Spock is strategically using an angry look, he's not angry.

    by Stereotypical Evil Archer

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:57 p.m. CST

    JethroBodine...

    by rev_skarekroe

    ...I was thinking the same thing with the scaly fabric. Apparently scales are the new black rubber.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:58 p.m. CST

    PREQUEL V'GER, now with scales!

    by Stereotypical Evil Archer

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:58 p.m. CST

    Also, that doesn't look like Spock's angry...

    by rev_skarekroe

    ...it looks like he's coldly serious. That's his "Don't make me angry" face.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:59 p.m. CST

    Owww!

    by cameron1975willi

    Young Uhura is hot!! http://www.ugo.com/ugo/html/gal lery/default.asp?gallery=star-trek_filmtv

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 4:59 p.m. CST

    Scales on Spock = ... not going there, I like the look.

    by Stereotypical Evil Archer

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 5 p.m. CST

    picture looked good but the cover looks r'tarded

    by IndyAbbey Jones

    spock looks pretty cool in the movie still, but on the cover he is like ohh mine boobie has poppen oot

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 5:02 p.m. CST

    I just went to the store to pick up a copy of this

    by GeekySciFiAnimeFreak

    and it is not there. WTF, Harry?

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 5:02 p.m. CST

    Quinto always looks like he's frowning...

    by Paul T. Ryan

    So I'm not hugely surprised.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 5:04 p.m. CST

    Will there be lots of spaceships going BOOM?

    by Stereotypical Evil Archer

    I hope so, I hope so.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 5:05 p.m. CST

    He better be sick or something

    by HoboCode

    He's angrily choking someone. Don't fuck this up JJ.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 5:06 p.m. CST

    Green and Blue and Red Alien Hotties?

    by Stereotypical Evil Archer

    Oh well, time to pick up MONGOL and the new UNEARTH cd, a day late and a dollar short.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 5:08 p.m. CST

    GOD THIS WILL BE SO FUCKING GOOD!

    by dr sauch

    I can't wait.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 5:08 p.m. CST

    scales n' such

    by zom-bot.com

    i don't think of the trend as 'scales', but costume designers trying to add a texture or also a 'tech' feeling to future fabrics, or those of the superhero costumes. it was like spiderman's costume was itself made up of a flexible, modular, weblike patterned fabric. the trek suits and others are going for hi tech future fashion- it makes sense. that fabric probably stretches, insulates, cools, absorbs, breathes...etc. PLUS it's more visually interesting than 10 feet of spandex or polyester on the screen.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 5:09 p.m. CST

    trailer attached to BOND

    by aboriginal

    so says WIRED. This is gonna be so good.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 5:12 p.m. CST

    Where's Spock's eyeshadow?

    by Flim Springfield

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 5:14 p.m. CST

    Context People

    by XoanonTORN

    We don't know the context of the Spock/Angry thing. <p> But I'll agree the cover image is balls.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 5:16 p.m. CST

    HARDCORE BRAH!!!!!!!!!!

    by milesdyson

    I think that's Kirk he's choking out.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 5:16 p.m. CST

    whoa - more syler than spock in that picture

    by Dreamfasting

    Hopefully it's just my imagination, but that doesn't show the dignity and cool passiveness that befits the image of Spock I was expecting.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 5:19 p.m. CST

    Goosebumbs. Period.

    by Se7en

    Just crapped in my pants.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 5:20 p.m. CST

    Looks like an expensive fan film

    by careyleefisher

    Wow, this looks terrible! Hate everything I have seen regarding the new "Star Trek". Hated the teaser trailer, hate the concept and now that I have actually seen stills from the movie I have to say this looks like a really expensive fan web series. Did somebody on the "Hidden Frontiers" suddenly hit the lottery and put all the money back into their internet series? I mean, come on, does anyone really see Kirk and Spock here? Has anyone ever seen the Halloween costume contests in Wizard magazine? That is exactly what that cover of EW looks like. Quinto looks lost and confused and almost plastic on the cover and Pine does not make me think of Kirk. No offense to Quinto or Pine but I do think they will come to regret taking these roles on once this film is rejected by "Star Trek" fans. I predict that this film will open to a decent but not spectacular opening weekend and then be quickly dispatched by whatever opens the following weekend. This thing has disaster written all over it for Paramount. You think "Star Trek" was dead before? Just wait until this disaster opens. I know that part of JJ Abrams pitch is that "This is not your father's "Star Trek". However, what that hack fails to understand is our Father's "Star Trek" is what we do want. However, our Father's "Star Trek" is in the past. If you do not want your Father's "Star Trek" then , by all means, move forward not back. I will take my father's "Star Trek" over "Star Trek 90210" anytime.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 5:21 p.m. CST

    '60s Starfleet uniforms on a big screen!!

    by Hercules

    this could be good.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 5:26 p.m. CST

    Badge patterns on the shirts?

    by careyleefisher

    JethroBodine, thanks for pointing that out about the tunics. The tunic pattern is made of little tiny insignias? Are you serious? Who in the Hell would notice that onscreen? Whose bright idea was this? Hey, Abrams, sometimes less is more. No need to overkill the uniforms. This whole things reeks of a total retcon of everything about the orginal series. I'll pass!

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 5:26 p.m. CST

    hmmm... I only just noticed that script girl hasn't updated in a

    by blckmgk13

    ...has she finally moved on to other casting couches or is it just that it has seemed an inordinate amount of time since the last update? Not that I care... I am just wasting space since I am not a huge Trekkie.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 5:27 p.m. CST

    awhile.....

    by blckmgk13

    ....carry on

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 5:28 p.m. CST

    Enterprise Bridge- get your complaints ready!

    by Heckles

    Behold: http://tiny.cc/6B6cO

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 5:32 p.m. CST

    blckmgk13: ScriptGirl

    by Playhouse

    She's still updating every week. It's AICN that's not posting her updates on a regular schedule. Check her out on YouTube or on MySpace.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 5:35 p.m. CST

    caryleefisher, you're wrong

    by dr sauch

    I don't want my father's star trek. I hated the original Shatner Star Trek. TNG is the only good ST series made (though I liked a couple of the first generation movies). I'm hoping that this will sell me on the soul of the original ST, and then maybe I'll go watch those shitty old shows. Thats right, TNG is the only good one, Shatner is a hack. Though I do like the rest of the cast (Nimoy, etc)

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 5:39 p.m. CST

    Just saw the bridge pics. WTF?

    by careyleefisher

    Is this a joke? Each picture makes me groan and laugh harder. This flick is going to be a BOMB

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 5:42 p.m. CST

    Spock

    by welsh_bullfrog_goon

    The last decent star trek was first contact, i'm not too up on this idea of going back all of the time into a franchises past,what has happened to the fresh ideas the movie industry lacks at the moment? A new star trek with fresh new characters, and regarding the picture i think spocks shoulders look too narrow and he looks a bit too skinny, the make-up work looks amazing though

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 5:42 p.m. CST

    dr sauch. TNG Best?????

    by careyleefisher

    Are you serious? How old are you? Have you seen TNG lately? If you don't want your Father's "Star Trek" then why would you want a shitty imitation of your father's "Star Trek"? Your argument makes no sense.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 5:43 p.m. CST

    He's showing emotion

    by Melvin_Pelvis

    Guess Spock hasn't embraced logic in this reimaging

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 5:47 p.m. CST

    HooDoggy- agreed

    by Heckles

    I can't base much on one picture. It looks a little off, however. Reminds me of the design from Minority Report for some reason. I don't expect the cheesy retro 60's bridge set, but making it look better than the last TNG movie outing is, well, silly.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 5:49 p.m. CST

    Kirk's uniform... black?

    by Heckles

    So the captains uniform is all black? Okay...

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 5:50 p.m. CST

    The bridge does fucking suck.

    by GeekySciFiAnimeFreak

    I bet that's not the real bridge. It's Kirk taking the Kobayashi Maru.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 5:51 p.m. CST

    Skirts aren't short enough!

    by Melvin_Pelvis

    C'mon we've waited a long time for this!

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 5:56 p.m. CST

    dr sauch and others...

    by menstrual_blitz

    Watch it again. There's only three seasons it won't take you long and i think you will be surprised. It seems most folks i talk to, who dis the old series, haven't actually seen the great episodes in a long time and all they seem to remember about the show is Kirk smooching on alien babes. That's not the show. Sure, Kirk kissed an alien babe or two, but no more than Riker (he had seven seasons of alien babe kissing). The old series had great stories, written by great writers, some legendary Science-fiction authors. Go to CBS.com, they have a bunch of old episodes free and high quality.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 5:59 p.m. CST

    Star Twinks

    by GoodTimeBobby

    ....they look too Metro Sexual for me.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 5:59 p.m. CST

    It is the bridge

    by Heckles

    The interview confirms that the pic shows Kirk and crew on the bridge, not a training room.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 6:01 p.m. CST

    I like the bridge...

    by menstrual_blitz

    ...though we're only seeing 1/4th of it. If anyone is expecting the exact TOS bridge, give up now. Don't bother with anything else about this movie. Just pretend it doesn't exist. Otherwise, waste all your precious time on earth complaining about useless shit.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 6:03 p.m. CST

    Spock's Eyeshadow. Good Point Flim Springfield

    by JethroBodine

    In the pics that I've seen of the new Spock he does indeed appear to be lacking the Vulcan eyeshadow. Curiouser and Curiouser. I knew that Quinto looked pretty good in the costume, but I couldn't quite put my finger on what was missing. Good call.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 6:06 p.m. CST

    ITS A CHARADE!!!!!!!!!!!

    by alice 13

    its not really them!!!!!!!!! dont believe it people!!!!! turn away!!!!!!!!!!

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 6:07 p.m. CST

    what's up w/that bridge design!!

    by darthwaz1

    wow that's awful, it doesn't resemble the OS bridge even slightly!

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 6:09 p.m. CST

    BWHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA!

    by zappaman

    If anyone sees the cover and thinks "Hey, that looks like it could be a good movie", they deserve to be punched in the face.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 6:13 p.m. CST

    No, i see the cover and think....

    by menstrual_blitz

    ...That's not even from the movie. it's an Entertainment Weekly publicity shot, which always look stupid and never gives a good impression of the film.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 6:14 p.m. CST

    How 'bout that? Karl Urban has that McCoy look.

    by riskebiz

    "Dammit Jim, he's a doctor ... not an actor from Lord of the Rings." .... I'm impressed with these images ... and more impressed by Urban. I wasn't sure about him when I heard he was cast, but he looks the part of Bones.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 6:15 p.m. CST

    Man, some of you people are...

    by menstrual_blitz

    ...straight up fascist about this shit. One right opinion, one wrong.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 6:17 p.m. CST

    Too bad Zachary Quinto cant act.

    by Sakurai

    He really is dreadful.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 6:18 p.m. CST

    Is this a Prequel or a Reboot?

    by codymr

    I remember reading about this project a while ago and my impression is that it was a retelling/reboot of the original Trek and characters and that it did not exist in the established cannon. For example I have read that Chekov appears in this film even though he was not seen in the original series until season 2. Does anyone know?

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 6:27 p.m. CST

    So finally we can see for ourselves

    by Geekgasm

    Its a REBOOT. They might have said so in the first place. As a REBOOT, I can go into it taking it at face value. But all that "oh its so respectful and revenrential of the canon", "oh, it fits right into the pre-existing lore", blah blah blah, that was obviously a load of bullshit from Abrams, Orci, and the other one. THat bridge set looks like an Australian's nightmare. So its the beginning of "J.J. Abrams presents: A Version of Star Trek", and not some kind of continuation of Gene Roddenberry's "Star Trek". Fine. One might have said so in the first pklace instead of trying to sell everybody a phony bill of goods.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 6:30 p.m. CST

    the idea behind chekov is....

    by menstrual_blitz

    ...the same explanation they gave for that continuity problem in Wrath of Kahn (how did Kahn recognize Chekov, if he wasn't a crew member while Kahn was aboard): he was always on the Enterprise in season one, just not working on the bridge. No one ever said his character had just arrived by season 2. Plus, you guys are way more sticklers for cannon then the creators ever where. In the first series they had multiple names for the federation , multiple histories and back stories, often contradicting each other. It just a show (movie).

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 6:34 p.m. CST

    Zappaman , smoke cock much?

    by optimus122

    Idiot.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 6:34 p.m. CST

    OMG SPOCK WOULD NEVAR....

    by Asaraiel

    .... do anything but stare resolutely ahead and emote nothing! Please. If Nimoy's portrayal did anything, it's show that Spock feels,and works to remain logical. And, bitches, Spock emoted quite a bit in the original Pilot. He also tells Starfleet to "go to hell" at the end of VI. So don't bitch and moan because Sylar looks kinda pissed. Maybe, you know, there's a good *story* reason for it. But you'll prolly skip the movie because you assumed some shit and you'll never know. Geez. Lighten up. We get short skirts and a guy that Nimoy has done nothing but praise publicly. Be happy we didn't get Jack Black as Spock or something.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 6:36 p.m. CST

    hmm posting pictures others host

    by palewook

    thou shall not link steal. <p> host em or link to the article, not the image directly. that's just rude, wrong, and slack. lucky someone hasn't swapped in a goatse image yet.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 6:37 p.m. CST

    And as for the Bridge...

    by Asaraiel

    Have we forgotten the spoilers? If you've read those, and you have an inkling of creativity in you, you can instantly come up with a few perfectly logical story-driven reasons why the tech is changing a bit.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 6:38 p.m. CST

    my take

    by killianx

    I like the costumes and spock. I am not digging the bridge or kirk. I like the special effects of the Kelvin but not so much the phasers on turrets

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 6:40 p.m. CST

    Please, blitz

    by Geekgasm

    "In the first series they had multiple names for the federation , multiple histories and back stories, often contradicting each other." That's because they were MAKING IT ALL UP FROM STRATCH on the original show. There's over 40 years of ironing out all the wrinkles, most of which was done by fans anyway. Somebody else has already done all the heavy lifting. These folks obviously wanted to make a movie that's their take on the material. Fine. Just say "we're re-making Star Trek! Isn't that great?" and don't smother everybody in bullshit for 9 months with all that "oh its a prequel ... oh its not a reboot ... well not exactly ... we're so respectful of the show's intricate backstory ... finally you'll see how the crew came together" - whatever. This movie is going to bear as much resemblance to the original Star Trek as The Phantom menace bore to the original Star Wars i.e. not too fucking much.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 6:42 p.m. CST

    Sorry but anytime a dude starts off with "I'm straight, but..."

    by IAmJack'sUserID

    ...and then goes on to say how good-looking other dudes are, well... I think you might want to re-evaluate your own definition of the word 'straight'. <p></p> I think the EW cover sucks. Spock's 'brows are too high; makes it look disconnected and fake.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 6:42 p.m. CST

    And ...

    by Geekgasm

    ... that's FINE. Just be straight about it and don't try to feed everybody a line of bullshit for 9 months.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 6:43 p.m. CST

    Fucking Paramount.

    by Playkins

    This was supposed to be out this season, and we've yet to see a real trailer for it.<P> Give the fans something to be exited about, for fuck's sake.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 6:48 p.m. CST

    I'm scared...

    by GeorgieBoy

    Mixing futuristic sets with 60's uniforms. This just ain't gonna work folks.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 6:52 p.m. CST

    Trailer will be with Quantum of Solace.

    by IAmJack'sUserID

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 6:56 p.m. CST

    I like it!

    by kafka07

    Of course the look is only one part of a larger whole of a film, but so far so good. I can barely recognize Karl Urban.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 7:05 p.m. CST

    geeeeez

    by snowtires

    Kirk looks like he belongs on The Hills

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 7:09 p.m. CST

    Looks mostly great

    by performingmonkey

    The stupid cover shot aside, I am relieved at how good the crew and bridge look. The uniforms are right and the bridge has a very cheesy old sci-fi movie style but greatly enhanced with hi-tech. Spock, Bones and Scotty look good. Not sure about Kirk but Chris Pine supposedly knocked it out the park. Quinto aside (who HAS to look like Nimoy's Spock seeing as they both appear here), the performances are way more important than the look of the characters. Thank god too because the guy playing Sulu is nothing like him, and again you don't think of Kirk when you look at Pine (hopefully we will once we've seen the movie!). They certainly look young but that's the whole point, this is set BEFORE TOS FFS! Hopefully we'll get a sequel and they will have grown into the parts.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 7:11 p.m. CST

    Great on the characters & Uni's, but...

    by Logan_1973

    WTF is with the bridge?

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 7:13 p.m. CST

    Took about 30 secs for me to get over bridge redesign & lack of

    by TallBoy66

    I'd be happy if there's a throwaway reference to "oh, Nero and his Romulan friends don't have forehead ridges and the bridge looks different because of time travel stuff" then I'm cool.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 7:13 p.m. CST

    Rommie forhead ridges

    by TallBoy66

    ooops

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 7:13 p.m. CST

    eric bana = darth maul?

    by brandon11

    finally the boundaries of star treck and star wars have been breached! millions of fellow geeks must be going nuts every where

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 7:15 p.m. CST

    I can't believe I am saying this but....

    by ChezKing

    this look good. Quinto looks perfect as Spock and this looks to be the best Star Trek yet.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 7:23 p.m. CST

    why is sylar/spock attacking Kirk in...

    by Cap'n Jack

    ...what seems like anger?? Not Star Trek-ish to me.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 7:25 p.m. CST

    i can believe i'm saying this

    by t40stunt

    it looks extremely ....LAME

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 7:32 p.m. CST

    Kirk's black uniform...explaination.

    by supergenius

    He has lost or taken off the outer tunic. Thus leaving him with just his black undershirt. Perhaps he is trying to hide his rank or identity for some reason...?

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 7:49 p.m. CST

    This looks great so far

    by Thrillho77

    but look at the new pic of Bana as Nero. Look at how it's shot from an angle. Now tell me it doesn't remind you of how the ENTIRETY of Battlefield Earth was shot!!! Ahhhh!

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 7:51 p.m. CST

    If you look at the other pics...

    by WIBoomer1

    ...which are spread out on different websites...this looks cool. the black shirt is the UNDERSHIRT...the gold command shirt should/will go over it... The Bridge...eh...I like some elements of what I see, but is that table structure like a yeoman's station? It would make sense...i mean, all the time, you see Yeoman Rand come up the turbolift, have Kirk sign the Padd, and then leave...wouldn't she have more than just the one thing to do?

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 7:52 p.m. CST

    Were early Starfleet bridge designs based on

    by Xiphos_2

    West hollywood night clubs decked out for Halloween? It looks Fabu!<p>In all seriousness please, Mr Abrams, turn out a better product then your last foray into movies. Sir I'm not asking for greatness because this is a Hollywood production in the 21 first century, I know that its not possible or probable, so if you could please turn out a competent movie. That's all I want minimal competence.<p> By the way, I'm not a cannon junky or trekkie. I would just like to see a minimally competent movie is all. I keep my expectations EXTREMELY low with Hollywood now a days.<p>Who's booking the bets on the time that J.J. Abrahms lap dog Bob Orci shows up? I got a finsky on 2130 hrs central standard time.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 7:53 p.m. CST

    Where No Star Trek Movie Has Gone Before.

    by Darth Valinorean

    ... as fans, we should collectively rejoice!!!

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 7:54 p.m. CST

    Big whoop.

    by Reelheed

    These stills haven't done anything to sell me on this project. Ice climbing with no gloves? Wow - theres gritty realism for you. I really want this to be good dammit!

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 7:55 p.m. CST

    And Brandon11 is right...

    by Darth Valinorean

    I think Nero = Darth Maul.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 8 p.m. CST

    Frankly I dont like it

    by Phategod2

    Spock looks like a serial Killer, Kirk looks like a Jonas Bother, and Eric Bana still looks like a pussy

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 8:02 p.m. CST

    Only prob fellas

    by Six Demon Bag

    everything looks more hi-tech than it did in the 60s...are they gonna explain why technology de-evolved? or are they gonna ignore it like the prequels did?

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 8:03 p.m. CST

    "excuse me while I have a nerd core breach!"

    by LarryTate

    that line cracked me up. This movie will rule!! Anyone who disagrees sucks cock by choice

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 8:03 p.m. CST

    Beverly NCC1701

    by aboriginal

    I have to say it is all looking good and those three shots all seem to tie into one scene, but . . . what can it be ?

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 8:19 p.m. CST

    J.J. Abrams theatrical track record...

    by TylerDurden3395

    His only other theatrical directing effort, Mission Impossible 3 was an underwhelming sequel to a big screen version of a beloved TV show that effectively killed the franchise. I expect him to do the same with Star Trek.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 8:32 p.m. CST

    Nerds

    by Emperor_was_a_jerk

    Nothing like Star Trek to really bring out all the nerds.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 8:33 p.m. CST

    The Vulcan Cock Block

    by TheBloop

    Really the world has moved past Star Trek, this will flop. What's next, a big budget Buffy movie? Oh wait, I would actually watch that....

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 8:43 p.m. CST

    Spock fights Kirk

    by flanaganagain

    Looks like that from picture above.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 8:45 p.m. CST

    the BRIDGE... is...

    by bma2192

    WELL... it reminds me of a scene from CHICAGO with all those dancers...which might be cool if this were a musical-- the SHAPE of the original bridge is so ICONIC--and the only recognizable thing in the bridge pic is the captains chair-- and who thought that lining the entire room with ROWS of stage lights was a good idea?? Sorry-Im rooting for this to be a great movie... but that BRIDGE looks like a ROOM-- a lower budget set piece-- just hope Im getting a bad impression from a partial pic so maybe Im totally wrong... I expected the "tech" to be updated... but wow-- lining up a bunch of flat screens side by side across the back of a square room isnt convincing me to suspend my disbelief-- of course Im ranting and Im sure a lot of work went into this... but this is my childhood ship and we're all gonna be picky-- so drop us all some bigger pics to convince us:)

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 8:57 p.m. CST

    the BRIDGE... again...

    by bma2192

    ...just wondering about the chick in RED-- the one standing at the DRAWING TABLE... in the middle of the BRIDGE... Im not sure if shes an artist, or maybe taking reservations for who sits where-- OK, now maybe THAT was being a little too picky-- but kinda funny-- even so, I am still SO looking forward to the film!

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 9:27 p.m. CST

    That better be Pon-farr

    by Diazanon

    Otherwise this is as fucked up as expected.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 9:36 p.m. CST

    MI:3

    by enderandrew

    Arguably MI:3 was the best in the series. What killed the franchise was Tom Cruise acting nuts, to the extent that Paramount has been considering doing a new MI movie without him. JJ is hit or miss. As I said about, I expect he'll make an entertaining movie. I don't expect it will be "Star Trek". Oh, and what do you call a Vulcan one-night-stand? Pon Farr and away!

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 9:37 p.m. CST

    The bridge...

    by Kelvington

    Oh dear god, I had high hopes for this, and from the statements of people who had seen it. Kevin Smith in particular, I thought the bridge would be... THE BRIDGE, the iconic round multi-station clean images from our memories or at least something close. Are we sure JJ was watching Star Trek when he made this set? And not Buck Rogers? Or Stargate? <P><P>This is NOT the bridge I grew up with, this is NOT the bridge I thought would appear and by God it's NOT the bridge I can appreciate. <P><P>I suspect next fall Stan and Cartmen will be doing an episode where Roddenberry's corpse gets raped by JJ and the writers.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 9:38 p.m. CST

    Oh man I gotta laugh

    by MurderMostFowl

    That group photo feels like a photo shoot for a teen angst band. I don't think this is going to go over well. Why on earth did they need to reboot this? Why not make a new movie with new characters? I can tell just from the pictures of the "bad guy" this is is going to miss the mark considerably.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 9:45 p.m. CST

    "Captain don't ever smack Uhura's ass again beeotch!

    by dihay

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 9:47 p.m. CST

    Spock probably hasn't learned to control his emotions yet.

    by ivehadsex

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 9:49 p.m. CST

    Pass

    by brobdingnag

    I've seen the original. There is no point in watching impersonators in a franchise that as been dead since DS9 went off the air.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 9:52 p.m. CST

    If "Heroes" were a Star Trek character

    by jtishere

    it would be on the ground, wearing a red shirt, with Dr. McCoy saying "He's dead, Jim."

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 10:02 p.m. CST

    SAVE UHURA SAVE THE WORLD!

    by Err

    Just like Heroes. I'm so clever.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 10:04 p.m. CST

    Nerd core breach, indeed...

    by Billyeveryteen

    Then again, my veins are empty.<p> Any junk will do.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 10:05 p.m. CST

    If Survivor were a Star Trek character

    by gotilk

    it would be exactly as you describe above. So some perspective is in order I would assume.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 10:09 p.m. CST

    This looks great

    by Jodet

    I'm all over this like bronze on a doorknob.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 10:13 p.m. CST

    Ol' dubba jay

    by Melvin_Pelvis

    has now raped my childhood<p> Sic 'em South Park

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 10:16 p.m. CST

    Retro customes but futuristic bridge set?

    by LarryTate

    If you're going to try to go future realistic with the bridge instead of 60's retro, then why keep the short skirts that reflect that retro image? They did nail the Dr. McCoy pose...

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 10:16 p.m. CST

    Spock can't be Ponn Farr-ing, they didn't know about it in Amok

    by TallBoy66

    Okay, yes, the timeline will be changed by Nero and Spock traveling back, so by the end of the movie we have the JJ-Trek-verse so they can do whatever they want. However, if the movie is about thier first meeting, and if these events happened regardless of mucking with the timeline, then Spock couldn't have Ponn Farr'ed and flipped out and tried to kill Kirk because then they would have been like "Oh, yeah, Spock did this years ago, he's just horny" in Amok Time. Argh, the continuity waves they are mucking about. Where's a Superboy Prime continuity punch when you need it?

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 10:17 p.m. CST

    Why is Kirk climbing out of a huge Phaser One?

    by Kelvington

    Just curious.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 10:26 p.m. CST

    UGO.com has crashed

    by LarryTate

    and burned. KHAAAAAAAAN!!!

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 10:39 p.m. CST

    Wow, Karl Urban looks....

    by odo19

    alot like Bones after all. Other than Quinto as Spock, he's the most recognizable as the character he's supposed to be playing. It's all in the hair and the expression on his face. Oh, and what the fuck is up with Pine's frosted blonde tipped bullshit. He looks like a complete asshole.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 10:47 p.m. CST

    Eric Bana's total lack of chin . . .

    by gruntybear

    . . . notice how he cleverly hides it with his "Thinker" pose. Honestly, Kirk's black outfit makes it look like that pale douchebag from that shitty vampire flick "Twilight" is somehow involved with this tremendously obvious Trek re-boot. Good luck with that, JJ. Can't wait 'til "Lost" fucking implodes, sans plausible ending.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 10:49 p.m. CST

    Sylock Attacks!

    by Wrecks

    hmmm. hmmm. yeah, um.... hmmm.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 10:58 p.m. CST

    Sylar got confused

    by Melvin_Pelvis

    and is trying to skull fuck the guy playing kirk

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 11:46 p.m. CST

    Lots of flailing over a few pics...

    by DreadPirateRoberts

    We have no idea what is happening in the Spock photo, maybe he is not pissed, maybe he is just intensely focused on some sort of meld-thing with the captain, who knows. He showed emotion all the time in TOS, just not intentionally. And he showed more in the pilot...There WAS a short outfit in one photo, so stop your griping....So what about the bridge being high tech. Current effects just show the bridge better (same as the ORIGINAL explanation for the Klingon change before the DS9 and Enterprise writers got cute about it)....The cast is young, they should be (with the possible exception of Bones and Scotty although I forget the canon age for bones)....Time will tell for the rest of it.

  • Oct. 15, 2008, 11:53 p.m. CST

    Maybe Spock is going through Pon Farr

    by gotilk

    .. or as they joke at the academy .. they call it his "time of the decade" or "watch what you say, he's on the farr"

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 12:04 a.m. CST

    Yup, that's Spock puttin' the chokehold on Kirk.

    by JackBauer@CTU

    Look closer...

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 12:20 a.m. CST

    Wow

    by Die_Hardest

    Eric Bana as the Romulan pirate/terrorist looks badass.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 12:23 a.m. CST

    Although

    by Die_Hardest

    Hadn't there been no visual contact between the Federation and the Romulans until Balance of Terror? Right? They fought that war without knowing what the other side looked like and the peace was negotiated over radio.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 12:36 a.m. CST

    Never been that interesting in Star Trek before

    by Spifftacular Squirrel Girl

    I never could finish watching the 1st movie. Khan was pretty good and everything after that just seemed forgettable. <p> With all of that said, I'm very willing to give this film a chance. I think the first real trailer will be the dealbreaker for me.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 12:42 a.m. CST

    Never been that "interested"...

    by Spifftacular Squirrel Girl

    ...I also wrote "wretch" instead of "retch" in another talkback earlier. Nuts.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 12:42 a.m. CST

    THIS LOOKS GREAT! Boy, you guys really are ALL idiots..

    by DarthMrBelvedere

    seriously, all you people posting are really Douche's...move out of your parents basements

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 12:49 a.m. CST

    Those Look Kick Ass

    by DKT

    I am officially VERY excited for this.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 1:12 a.m. CST

    Looking very, very good!!

    by thot

    Everything I've seen so far has been encouraging! LOVE the new pics. You nerds freaking out over Spocks emoting need to actually watch a few episodes of TOS and learn a few things about Spock. Can't wait for next summer!!!

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 1:36 a.m. CST

    It all looks amazing, MAKE IT SO

    by reflecto

    Please JJ Abrams, try not to suck this time.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 1:38 a.m. CST

    OH AND SPOCK EMOTED LIKE A MOTHERFUCKER

    by reflecto

    Especially in TOS. Give me a fucking break people. WATCH the show sometime. Especially early on, dude was outta control.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 1:47 a.m. CST

    EW is to Variety as USA Today is to New York Times

    by JackRabbitSlim

    "Ooh look - pretty pictures."

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 1:49 a.m. CST

    ForeheadRidge-Less Romulan! Yahoo!

    by thevision

    I picked up the promo poster at Comic-Con and couldn't tell if Eric Bana's Nero had forehead ridges- looking at the pic, he doesn't! Thank God! Hated the Fucking BermanBraga Romulan Forehead ridges. Romulans are back as the best villains in the Trek Universe.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 2:31 a.m. CST

    He's not angry

    by BTWR

    He's extremely focused. Seems obvious to me.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 2:45 a.m. CST

    AVATAR - fucking your eyeballs in 2009

    by Motoko Kusanagi

    nothing else matters

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 2:51 a.m. CST

    Still very sceptical...

    by UndeadXeke

    ...but Star Trek has needed a reboot for so long, this could be what is needed. Would rather they created a new ship/crew - though it probably wouldn't have the draw of an established one. I'll reserve my judgement until I see a trailer...these pictures look excellent, but it's real easy to make stills look great.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 2:57 a.m. CST

    YES!!!! MINISKIRTS!!! :D

    by TheGhostWhoLurks

    This film is OFFICIALLY the biggest hit of the summer! :D

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 3:02 a.m. CST

    i'll give it a chance

    by Uridium

    But that bridge shot just looks like they are a bunch of 14 year olds. Is this going to be the old 'academy test flight that turns into an exciting adventure' type movie. YAAAY Star Trek: Space Camp.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 3:02 a.m. CST

    Everyone looks FANTASTIC, but...

    by TheGhostWhoLurks

    Why does Kirk look like Zac's understudy from "Saved By The Bell?" I'm no great fan of The Shat, but c'mon!!!<p>At least get someone who LOOKS like he could command a starship.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 3:14 a.m. CST

    And this crapfest looks crappier and crappier

    by ominus

    new photo of the bridge here: sorry boys and girls,but i expect to see a military-like bridge of a futuristic spaceship,not a GODDAMN BEAUTY-SHOP to have my hair done. JESUS CHRIST

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 3:21 a.m. CST

    sorry forgot the link

    by ominus

    http://tinyurl.com/4924ld

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 3:32 a.m. CST

    Someone has to say it, but Simon Pegg Already did.,,

    by ButterNipples

    "As sure as day follows night, as sure as eggs is eggs and as sure as every odd-numbered Star Trek movie is shit..." Simon, Simon , Simon... Love you as Scotty, I'm hoping this thing makes enough cash to merit a sequel. So I can hold you to your words!

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 3:43 a.m. CST

    That better be the TRAINING bridge. Would explain the black shir

    by Pixelsmack

    JJ said that IS the Enterprise's bridge. He also said Kirk is wearing black in that scene for a reason. Course that doesn't admit that it's NOT the trainer. However in the other pic Kirk is wearing the same black shirt and appears to be outside. So what the hell? If that is indeed the Enterprise's bridge the set designer needs to have their ovaries removed.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 3:57 a.m. CST

    well

    by Fortunesfool

    if someone can name a prequel that wasn't crap, i'll start getting excited about this.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 3:59 a.m. CST

    Looks terrible

    by kwisatzhaderach

    Star Trek 90210 indeed. Star Trek used to be all about the writing. As soon as Kurtzman and Orci were announced all hope went out the window.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 4:09 a.m. CST

    I am straight but...

    by cameron1975willi

    ...if I wasn't, 'IAmJack'sUserID' would be the first one sucking my balls. P.S. Everything I've seen so far looks dope! I love that they've kept the red barrier that surrounds the Captain's chair, nice design continuity. I can't wait for this movie!

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 4:13 a.m. CST

    Spifftacular Squirrel Girl

    by kwisatzhaderach

    Try IV and VI, if you liked II you'll probably enjoy them. Just steer clear of the Next Gen movies, although First Contact is pretty watchable.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 4:18 a.m. CST

    Jim Cameron on Avatar

    by kwisatzhaderach

    Some proper sci-fi: http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=pQpDD6w6KOs

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 4:37 a.m. CST

    kwisatzhaderach

    by unionJACKass.webs.com

    That's old news, mate.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 4:38 a.m. CST

    Zachary Quinto looks great as Spock

    by unionJACKass.webs.com

    Could they have found a better Spock??? I think not. Great casting. I can't wait to see this. I just wish Tom Cruise would've been Christopher Pike.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 4:58 a.m. CST

    DENIED!

    by deanbarry

    I was so FIRST this morning (or evenine, where ever the hell you may live). But my computer froze...dammit. I even had a witty Heroes/brain cut quote and all. Now it's just passe. Oh well. Hey man, I CANNOT WAIT for this. I'm not a Trekkie by any means, but I am a JJ junky.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 5:01 a.m. CST

    Good, they have miniskirts

    by David Cloverfield

    That's all I expect from Star Trek.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 5:05 a.m. CST

    Listen folks -

    by Mr Gorilla

    Mission Impossible 3 was one of the most fun times I've had in the cinema i recent years. The action sequences were ACTUALLY FUCKING EXCITING. The Vatican sequence was fun. The bridge sequence was jaw-dropping. The performance from Cruiser was committed. The performance from Philip SH was kick-ass. It was better than CASINO ROYALE. It wasn't trying to be BOURNE. At the very least, it proved that in STAR TREK, JJ is going to do his utmost to deliver thrills and spills.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 5:24 a.m. CST

    Open Letter To Hollywood: Stop With The Prequels Please!!!!

    by Media Messiah

    We need to see the future universe of Star Trek, hopefully something that can be as sweeping in terms of the epic scope as the first two original Star Wars films, not this step down to prequels which have proven themselves to be off-putting at best, and poor marketing gimmicks in the least. I have never seen a successful prequel before, not one, as they all lack a spirited reason to be, known as purpose. Is such a thing possible, making a good prequel; Yes??? But is it something that is worth investing in when they, prequels, fail to advance the over all story??? Absolutely not!!!<BR><BR>The future of Star Trek is to be found in the future, not in the past. Move on please!!! And next time, hand Star Trek over to Joss Whedon, and give him a handsome budget in order to finally give Star Trek some much needed scope and grandeur so t can compete at the box office for once!!!

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 6:06 a.m. CST

    Forget EVERY SINGLE TREKKIE ALIVE for just one second

    by DOGSOUP

    This will either blow up in the mainstream because everybody in it is just so dreamy (Heh, 14 year old girls fawning over Karl Urban) OR it will fail miserably because the mainstream will avoid it like herpes because the Fans freak them out. This movie will sink or swim based on how the kinds of people who have never seen a star trek show react to it. Jesus titty fuck what am I saying? You guys will give it Spider Man breaking numbers opening weekend because you'll see it 15 times so you can debate time travel continuity and the variances on the movie Enterprise and the OS Enterprise and how your childhoods were raped. Then a sequal then a prequal then a sequal to a prequal then a sequal sequal to ad nauseum. Get used to this crew because youse guyses are going to have them stick around for the next 20 years. If your going to make a religion out of it have the balls to actually declare its a religion and start churches. In conclusion, Things Portland Oregon has in its favor: Chuck Palahnuik, Suicide Girls, Dark Horse Comics, Will Vinton Studios, Hawthorne Girls, and The Watchmen playing in its entirety for the first time in front of an audience tomorrow night.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 6:56 a.m. CST

    Now I know why Simon Pegg cried...it looks...AWESOME!

    by HarryBlackPotter

    This and Watchmen are going to rock. Bring on 2009!

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 7:01 a.m. CST

    Super cool as fuck!!!!!!!

    by Col. Tigh-Fighter

    I'm offically having a geekgasm now :)

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 7:04 a.m. CST

    The new bridge reminds me of...

    by Pizza The Hut

    ...that shitty show "Enterprise", or an obsessed Star Trek fan's apartment. BAAAAAAD.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 7:12 a.m. CST

    the black top

    by Bouncy X

    i dont really get the big deal, kirk often wore this green vest thingy on the original show along with the more famous yellow shirt. so this black top is probably their version of the green one. and the bridge looks pretty cool, totally not what i expected but while this is the past for Trek, its still the future for us so things shouldnt be big ass buttons and switches. its 2008 not 1968. granted its just one picture but its sorta funny how this bridge looks more advanced than the Enterprise one (as in the show Enterprise, before morons read the wrong way). lol

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 7:14 a.m. CST

    Best elements from the 60s TOS show were...

    by Pizza The Hut

    The actors, the ship exterior, bridge set, costumes, and music. The rest of the show could really suck and often times did. Hopefully they haven't Fukd with the look of the Enterprise as much as they have the bridge, otherwise it could get really stinky. Costumes look OK though.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 7:21 a.m. CST

    At least her uniform looks good

    by The StarWolf

    But I'd be happy to send Abrams a set of the original series DVDs so he can see what the Bridge is SUPPOSED to look like. This version looks like a retread of the ones on ENTERPRISE. Feh.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 7:22 a.m. CST

    I hope this isn't like the time when...

    by Pizza The Hut

    ...when Star Wars fans jacked off at seeing Yoda in the trailer for The Phantom Menace, because they were in for a royally rude awakening. Hopefully this won't be such a let-down, but that bridge really does look bad.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 7:38 a.m. CST

    HarryBlackPotter

    by kwisatzhaderach

    JJ Abrams and Zack Snyder are lousy filmmakers. Jim Cameron's return will put everyone in their place, oh yes.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 7:43 a.m. CST

    I like that bridge.

    by David Cloverfield

    MAybe I'm not too invested enough in Star Trek. You can have some mean drinking games with TOS though.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 7:46 a.m. CST

    Thanks for the ad for Ent. Weekly!

    by Kid Z

    ...yeah, rrright. So Uhura runs the communications array via joysticks? And where's Kumar? Meh. Looks passable, I guess. I'll go see it, what the hell...

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 7:53 a.m. CST

    I'm gonna say that the black top....

    by Dragon Man

    ... has someting to do with where Kirk's status in Starfleet is in the story, like he's on probation or something to that effect. Kirk was always in shit at the Academy for doing things his way, it was always pointed out.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 8:29 a.m. CST

    The joysticks

    by Pizza The Hut

    I'm guessing they don't have much to do on long treks but play video games.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 8:36 a.m. CST

    Hot damn!

    by BackStJoe

    Next year is gonna be killer! First Watchmen and now Star Trek; looks AMAZING.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 8:38 a.m. CST

    SequePreboot

    by sapno_krei

    That's the best way to describe this flick. I can't wait!

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 8:55 a.m. CST

    Looks like Sylar is pissed in that picture

    by jackofhearts29

    He's gonna use the old Vulcan-Mutant Virus Head-Removal trick on this poor Redshirt sumbitch...

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 9:01 a.m. CST

    Definitely sparked my interest

    by Slippy

    The pics look better than the teaser. I'm interested. . .

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 9:06 a.m. CST

    this is looking good

    by j2talk

    'course there is no pleasing EVERYONE....Shatner-Bitter much?!?!?!

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 9:21 a.m. CST

    OMG! AICN whoring out for another crappy JJ project!

    by Darksider

    "JJ". That is SO cute! Is that his pet name? AWESOME! Seriously, this whole project is just tragic. I can't believe STAR TREK has been reduced to J.J. Abrams' bullshit gimmicks, 60's skirts, and Karl Urban in a wig. While we're on the subject of rebooting shit, FUCK THE DARK KNIGHT! I want the Adam West BATMAN back with Robin in short shorts and that big ass red phone so we can save Gotham City!

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 9:28 a.m. CST

    Kirk's hand

    by rotgut1

    Anyone notice it's bandaged up? Musta got inna fight. Cool!!

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 9:29 a.m. CST

    Belly-aching whiners

    by rotgut1

    To those belly-aching whiners out there: it's fine to have an opinion, I am all for that. But think about this. Which would you rather have: A) Another half-baked attempt at "Star Trek" via another Trek spin-off featuring a bunch of copy-cat characters with 1/100th the soul of what made TOS so wonderful OR B) A TOS-era movie with original TOS characters recast with talented actors and an updated, reimagined look which may or may not meet your exact specifications It's not like they made the bridge some giant, stadium-sized arena or something. It's not like they made the bridge the size of a Toyota Yaris. So there's some creative license with texture and color and lighting. I say embrace change - sometimes change is fun! Besides, we haven't seen the whole thing yet - a full bridge shot might look really great! Think about it. After several miserable, failed, lame Trek projects, we are getting an honest, "from the heart" attempt at TOS in 2009 and the prospects of it actually being better-than-decent are looking good. Weight the pros and cons and stop your belly-aching because a lot of us are sick of it.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 9:29 a.m. CST

    Server's down

    by rotgut1

    ...over at trekmovie.com

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 9:57 a.m. CST

    Oh my god, RELAX!!

    by Pdorwick

    So much sturm and drang for six still pictures!? Enjoy them and wait for the movie.<br><br>Now let's get back to talking about why Lost is crap.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 10:01 a.m. CST

    Eyebrow Sex

    by Purgatori

    Quinto is freaking hot. Woot. Between him and Pegg I'm a happy geekgirl.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 10:02 a.m. CST

    Kirk's bandaged hand...

    by RokurGepta

    If you read the article, it hints that Kirk and Sulu got in a fight in the previous scene...

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 10:07 a.m. CST

    I don't think these kids can steer.

    by RogueWarrior65

    Jesus, it looks like a boy-band turned fanboy-band.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 10:20 a.m. CST

    Don't mess with what works

    by The StarWolf

    Rotgut1 - one of Hokeywood's biggest problems is its insistence on messing with what works until it doesn't. OK, that's true of the computer industry as well. Point being, one of the most 'magic' moments in the entire TREK franchise was in the Next Fabrication episode RELICS when former Chief Engineer Montgomery Scott - who'd spent decades in a transporter matter stream - tells the Enterprise 'D' computer to set up a holodeck program. "The Bridge of the Enterprise." "Please specify which version." "NCC-1701, no bloody 'A', 'B', 'C' or 'D'." "Program complete. You may enter when ready." And Scotty does and, as the doors open, we're back in time on *The Bridge*, complete with blinkie winkies and sound effects. We were home. Unfortunately, Abram didn't get that and, just because it was good enough for 40 years doesn't mean we should use it. Let's just forget it all and go with a whole new look and feel. Reminds me of a famous restaurant here which had been booked solid, 'reservation only' for about 35 years, until it was bought out and the new owners decided it needed a makeover. A few months later they filed for bankruptcy. Some people never learn. You don't mess with what works.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 10:33 a.m. CST

    "it looks like a boy-band turned fanboy-band"

    by Geekgasm

    That's funny right there.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 10:38 a.m. CST

    The new bridge looks cool and all, but...

    by Clavius

    why does it look more advanced than Picard's bridge?<br> <br>I know if you did a straight re-build of the classic TV era bridge to the big screen, it would look more than a little cheesy, but they could still "tweak" it without completely redesigning it. I need to see more, but it looks like too much of the classic look is lost here. The uniforms look spot-on though.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 10:49 a.m. CST

    new pick...not in the EW issue....of the crew...

    by DANNYGLOVERS_DICKBLOOD

    http://tinyurl.com/548ubr

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 10:52 a.m. CST

    RogueWarrior65

    by NoHubris

    The "acting style" is going to make all the difference IMHO.<p>For example, in the MAD MEN DVD commentary, the producers said that they were look for acting styles for the younger actors that was different from the typical approach -- and it worked. We'll see if JJ's TREK took a similar path.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 10:55 a.m. CST

    OMG SPOCK IS WEARING A BLACK SHIRT TOO!

    by Ye Not Guilty

    OMG, look at Spock. He's wearing a black shirt under his blue one. EPIC FAIL, JJ.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 10:57 a.m. CST

    meant to say "...LOOKING for acting styles"

    by NoHubris

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 11:07 a.m. CST

    Awesome! Awesome!

    by Spacesheik

    The stills of the actors ans sets looks fuckign amazing. This movie is going to rock your arses.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 11:07 a.m. CST

    Pegg for president

    by pumaman

    I can just hear him now. Ya canne do it captin , she's gonnee blow !

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 11:14 a.m. CST

    Laughably bad

    by EverythingEverywhereStinks

    Well all you "I never liked Trek" people out there must have rock hard boners for all this crap that surfaced on the net in the last 24 hours. That ridiculous bridge in the photo looks like it's made of plastic. I expect to see Gil Gerard and Twiki in the background of that photo. Jar Jar Abrams could have saved everyone a lot of time if he had simply been man enough at the beginning of all this to tell us he was reimaginging Star Trek to the same degree that Battlestar Galactica was, instead of stringing us along trying to make us believe he knew what he was doing. It is amusing to see though that the harmless, nerdy Star Trek fan will be replaced by the hide-behind-my-ISP, hyperagressive, destroy all opposition with vulgarity Star Trek fan. I'm sure Gene would be proud that Jar Jar Abrams has made it acceptable for Star Trek fans to be blood thirsty assholes. Have at it Space Monkeys!

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 11:17 a.m. CST

    "Star Trek Kids"

    by Curious Jorge

    These actors look impossibly young to be in full control of a starship...

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 11:19 a.m. CST

    The bridge

    by DreadPirateRoberts

    While I totally agree with 'StarWolf' about the moment in Relics, Abrams is walking a fine line here. First, the old bridge looks lower tech than something we could build today, let along in the 23rd century. So he needs to respect the old show mythology (which it looks like he is attempting more than I thought he would with the uniforms and such) but not alienate a mainstream audience.<p> And as for not messing with something that works, remember that TOS did not "work" in the end from a mainstream success perspective. I loved it, but it was canceled after two seasons, and got a 1 year lower budget reprieve. It became beloved AFTER it's original death. And the later TOS movies did not respect the old bridge, uniforms, alien makeup, or lots of other things, so this is hardly unprecidented.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 11:21 a.m. CST

    Having actually watched when it first aired...

    by crankyoldguy

    ...I have high hopes, even if I've been lukewarm about Abram's TV work - Alias, Lost, though haven't seen Fringe. Maybe I'd like lost if I'd got on board from the beginning, but every time I attempted viewing, it was a case of I don't care a whit about these folks, what else is on. Still, the general look of the uniforms, even the bridge chair, taps into the 8, 9-year-old in me that watched the original series when it first aired, not the syndicated re-runs. If the bridge isn't an exact replica, it doesn't bother me. DS9 and Enterprise did those tributes. Clearly, this is a re-boot/re-imagining with nods to that original show. Remember, Shatner was mighty young when he started on the show; we've just all grown up with him, some of you knew his older movie Kirk better than the TV version. Ditto for Spock, etc. Sure, there's lots of sentiment and personal memories tied up with Trek, especially the original program. But so far, there's a lot in these photos that look right, not wrong. All the already-hate-it children on AICN are no surprise. But I don't want to see any of that "raped my childhood" crapola as I really did see TOS as a child (hence my being old; I've been cranky since my 20s) and this is no "raping." I think it will do well and hope it does well or all we'll be left with are those "few" hours of Trek available - how many hundreds of episodes is that from the various series?

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 11:21 a.m. CST

    That's because you're NOT straight, cameron1975.

    by IAmJack'sUserID

    Commenting on how good-looking dudes are and expressing a desire for a dude to suck your balls does not a straight guy make. Did you miss National Coming Out Day?

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 11:46 a.m. CST

    dewds

    by Melvin_Pelvis

    Romies don't have ridged foreheads, that's klingons.<p> Romies are a offshoot of vulcans and so are also ears guys

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 11:48 a.m. CST

    THE BRIDGE

    by Friendo

    Reimagining or updating the Bridge design is fine with me. I just don't like what they've done here (assuming this IS the Enterprise bridge and not an Academy training bridge). Those rows of dressing table lights, the overall whiteness and brightness (more like a Sickbay ambience) feels all wrong. And the CLUTTER. There are cues they could take from the TOS bridge: simple, elegant, functional, iconic, abbreviated, with BLACK, GREY AND RED... none of that is evident here. So it feels completely off. The only thing is the captain's chair. I know the TOS bridge tech was crude and primative by today's standards, but what I always liked about it and what I still like about it was how abbreviated the tech was. A few rows of colored lights and buttons, a viewer thing for Spock... you could operated an entire starship with a row of unmarked buttons and damn few viewscreens or displays... and the bridge was usually a rather dark brooding place with indirect lighting. This photo looks, as someone else said, "like an Australian's Nightmare". - ha ha ha ha - The casting and the uniforms look good though. And some of the dashboard tech that was leaked earlier (I think it was a shuttle craft) really had that clunky '60s tech look nailed down. I'm reserving judgement for now. - - - - Oh, and speaking of homoerotic, did anyone notice that Kirk and Spock's tits are touching on the Entertainment Weakly cover???? HAHAHHAH AH AHA HAH AHA

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 12:02 p.m. CST

    pumaman - Pegg with a Scottish accent

    by unionJACKass.webs.com

    It'll be better than this, but... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7PDdXJoBwBo

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 12:02 p.m. CST

    They started giving Romulans forehead bumps...

    by rev_skarekroe

    ...in one of the movies. Not huge ones like the Klingons, just a little something.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 12:13 p.m. CST

    Spock is pissed!

    by Gatsby Seeker

    AND HE SHOULD BE!...Spock is a starship officer and cadet Kirk is...well...being cadet Kirk! Surprised that more starfleet officers didn't choke Kirk. This is exactly what I want in this film. Kirk probably coming across a stuck-up Vulcan and not getting his way...Spock had to show him the 'other possibility' of annoying a Vulcan in ways that only Kirk could. HA! Awesome! (Don't love the bridge, though...maybe too far afield of Classic Trek...eh, we'll wait and see why.)

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 12:20 p.m. CST

    Prison Rape Spock

    by Stuntcock Mike

    "Your MINE, bitch!

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 12:21 p.m. CST

    Now, where's his other hand?

    by Stuntcock Mike

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 12:48 p.m. CST

    TOS forever!!!

    by EriamJH

    Just saying, because its true. All other Trek spinoffs suck cock by choice!

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 1:01 p.m. CST

    THIS IS GOING TO SUCK!

    by ThaJackaL

    MORE BALLS THEN ELTON JOHN!!!!

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 1:01 p.m. CST

    I am a die hard trekkie and this looks great.

    by AllPowerfulWizardOfOz

    I was not sure how this would "look" but judging just from the photos I am happy with the overall "look". I can accept this as Star Trek. Now lets see a trailer. I am pumped.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 1:14 p.m. CST

    re: They started giving Romulans forehead bumps...

    by Melvin_Pelvis

    those guys in nemesis weren't romulans, they were a subject race backing Shinzon to overthrow the romie empire

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 1:18 p.m. CST

    Melvin_Pelvis

    by RokurGepta

    you're a fucking moron... the Romulans have had forhead bumps for ages..... right around their eyebrow area....

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 1:24 p.m. CST

    RokurGepta

    by Melvin_Pelvis

    link a pic or it doesn't exist

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 1:58 p.m. CST

    The Bridge Pic and You Morons

    by Asaraiel

    You idiots bitching about the Bridge do realize that you're seeing very little of it, right? The full pic has Spock up close so its from his station. You see Sulu in his CHAIR, but not the forward stations at all. You see Kirk, in a chair not too far departed, Sulu in a chair, and the area behind Kirk. That's not much. And certainly not enough to say that they've totally gone away from the original core idea. Obviously, since Spock is where he is in the full pic, it's a round, mid-sized room with stations lining the back wall in a curve, and a forward set of stations with a raised command chair. That's a fucking Star Trek bridge. The end. Every show has featured that basic design with minor variations here and there. Stop bitching.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 3:21 p.m. CST

    Here you go, Melvins_Pelvis

    by rev_skarekroe

    Second GIS link. Not tough to find. http://www.thecreoletomato.com/images/Romulans.jpg

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 4:05 p.m. CST

    Ridges

    by Melvin_Pelvis

    http://tinyurl.com/4tvyh3 are evident here<p> But I saw an ep of DS9 last night where ridges weren't evident.<br> It's about a 50/50 split on gis for post OS romies having a pronounced brow ridge which considering romulan origins makes me wonder on canonity of ridges.<p> And considering who was running the ST 'verse at the time that ridges appeared (Berman and Braga) and how they poisoned the well. I choose no ridges.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 4:26 p.m. CST

    Massive continutity error?

    by careyleefisher

    A Korean Sulu, characters that are appearing together way too early in "Trek" canon, a Constitution class bridge that is completely wrong and now, unless Bana's Romulan is never seen by faux Kirk and company, they are encountering a race that they never met until "Balance Of Terror"? Add to that all the photos of Quinto looking plastic and this thing looks like a hot mess. This looks like next year's "Speed Racer".

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 5:47 p.m. CST

    MINISKIRTS=ONE TICKET SOLD!

    by Earthquake WestCoast

    But, the skirts aren't short enough. At least the girls aren't wearing pants. And at least they didn't dress all the characters in black (I'm looking at you G.I. Joe) -_-

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 5:52 p.m. CST

    THE BRIDGE WORKS

    by Earthquake WestCoast

    People should stop complaining about the bridge. What do you want? You want the bridge to look like a 40 year old t.v. show set that was made on a low budget. This ISN'T A SCI-FI ORIGINAL program they're making! This is a multi-million dollar production. Plus the bridge works extremly well with the look of the costumes! Really nice and bright! Btw...YAY FOR HOT GIRLS WEARING MINISKIRTS!

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 6:13 p.m. CST

    I knew this talkback

    by SithMenace

    would degenerate into douchebaggery. You can tell all of the fans that are way too invested in Trek because they're the ones that come in and act like Star Trek just broke up with them.

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 8:25 p.m. CST

    PICARD NEEDS TO HAVE A CAMEO

    by Earthquake WestCoast

    Since the movie starts off during the NEXT GENERATION era, they should show Picard and the Enterprise try to stop the renegade Romulans, but are unable to stop them from going back in time, luckly Nimoy Spock is on hand to try to save the day. As for why the bridge looks different, who's to say that when the renegade Romulans went back in time that they didn't destroy the original Enterprise being built in space, and that's why this "new" enterprise is being built on Earth (so it can't be attacked) and that the look of the inside is different now because of the renegade time bandits. BTW......GIRLS NEED SHORTER SKIRTS! ^_^

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 8:54 p.m. CST

    ST: TNG stands for

    by Melvin_Pelvis

    Star Trek: The Nose Generation<p> Check out the schnozes on the cast

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 8:54 p.m. CST

    Soooo

    by Melvin_Pelvis

  • Oct. 16, 2008, 8:55 p.m. CST

    PICARD'S NOSE NEEDS TO HAVE A CAMEO

    by Melvin_Pelvis

    ftfy

  • Oct. 17, 2008, 8:12 a.m. CST

    Star Trek is wasted on its fans.

    by JumpinJehosaphat

    This thread is what I would point to in defense of the eradication of all sci-fi geeks. Why would you whine about details out of context? Oh, that's right: you know better than anyone else. Just you against the world. "Spock would never blah blah blah", and "Enterprise would never look like blah blah blah". If a phrase like this has ever been said or typed by you, you have the joyless existence everyone thinks you have. Wretched nerd people! I should have the theater to myself, at least. I'm sure some of you will show up anyway, you hypocritical bastard sacs.

  • Oct. 18, 2008, 4:02 p.m. CST

    Context my ass

    by ominus

    ok i ll accept that we have to see in what context is the pic of the ready-to-kill young spock.he is younger,he cant control his emotions etc.ok lets accept it,althought i dont understand this argument.spock is supposed to be a half vulcan,alf NORMAL-human,not michael mayers.. <p> but concerning the bridge why should i wait for the context? it doesnt resemble at all the original ncc-1701 enterprise,it doesnt resemble the bridge of a semi-militaristic spaceship in a movie where speace battles and human confrontations are expected,it doesnt even resemble a well designed bridge for a spaces<>hip.i mean what the fuck are the black joysticks for?.is the crew playing atari games during its break? is this the context are we talking about? that retrogaming exists in the future too? <p>anyway this movie and watchme will be the crapfests of 2009.yes they will be good movies,and probably they are going to make money,but for me they dont their respects to the original source,well notas they should.

  • Oct. 20, 2008, 7:11 p.m. CST

    For all you people who "know" star trek...

    by menstrual_blitz

    The writers of this film have already mentioned the Next Gen episode "Yesterdays" enterprise (one of the most acclaimed episodes ever) as a huge influence on this new story. Now, if all of you out there complaining about continuity and the new design of the bridge would just think about Yesterdays Enterprise and how time travel effected our heroes and their environment, you'll see that all this bitching and moaning is a waste of time. Cannon is safe and sound people. To spell it out for all the trekkies; remembering the Next Gen episode mentioned above, it would be like seeing the Enterprise D bridge after the Enterprise C went through the time rift and saying "What the fuck happened to the bridge? and what's Tasha Yar doing there and why is Wesley Crusher an actual officer, this totally shits on next gen cannon." UNDERSTAND PEOPLE.

  • Dec. 26, 2009, 10:30 p.m. CST

    Re

    by ELISABETTA19In

    It’s high time to confess that you surprised us with your perfect outcome related to this good post. Thus, I have to try to write the legal dissertation on the base of your stuff. Or believably, this is achievable to find some <a href="http://www.exclusivethesis.com">thesis</a> service.

  • Dec. 29, 2009, 4:12 p.m. CST

    WTF???

    by orcus