Logo

Cool News

Another enthusiastic review of Darren Aronofsky's THE WRESTLER comes charging in from Rome!

Published at:  Sep 11, 2008 3:07:10 PM CDT

Ahoy, squirts! Quint here with a spy calling himself JediMoonShyne who caught a screening of Aronofsky's THE WRESTLER over in Italy. The more that comes out about this flick the more it seems Aronofsky knocked this one out of the park. Can't wait to see Mickey Rourke going crazy for myself! Enjoy the review!



Thanks again for posting up my thoughts on 'Choke', you guys rock. Last night I saw Darren Aronofsky's new one 'The Wrestler' which was excellent.
Here are a few words -

'The Wrestler'
Darren Aronofsky, 2008

A titanic Rourke slams his way into Oscar contention

As a concept, Darren Aronofsky's latest outing 'The Wrestler' is the closest this oft-misjudged director has ever been to conventional cinema, and it works for him. It's an intelligent move. Not only will the film reassure all those fans of his that were alienated after 'The Fountain', it will also undoubtedly win western audiences over in the theaters. For what is more American than wrestling after all? The story itself is in fact decidedly unconventional; following an aged, down-and-out grappler named Randy "The Ram" Robinson (played by a perfect fit in Mickey Rourke) whose loneliness and sudden ill-health provoke an attempt to contact his estranged daughter. We are introduced to Randy on fight night, as he wins over a particularly rowdy crowd to retain his position as champion. We feel the thrill of adrenaline as The Ram delivers his signature move. Then we experience his subsequent comedown after finding himself locked out of his trailer park home for not paying the rent. As his puffer-jacketed form shuffles to sleep in the back of a minivan plastered with peeling posters we realise that life hasn't been so kind to the burly Randy. Through all this Aronofsky employs the kind of hyperrealism that was used so effectively in 'Requiem for a Dream'. It is the perfect complement to a sport that is usually seen to involve so much colour and theatrics, yet here is exposed warts and all by some sharp direction.

With 'The Wrestler' Aronofsky creates a Hollywood hero story in new and unflattering clothing. Despite straying once or twice into cliché territory he manages to leave this melodrama in the locker room, for the most part. Randy is certainly a gladiator in the traditional sense, a hired performer whose job it is to satisfy the bloodthirsty appetite of a baying mob. And Rourke hands in a titanic performance to fill these boots until the laces are strained tight. His shaking hands and rasping breath. A face scarred by cosmetic surgery and skin dried to a crisp orange by all those years of enforced tanning. He is really a sight to see. These attributes simply add to the already knife-edge realism to create a character whose rigorously maintained appearance is exactly what make him so hideous on the outside. Randy is certainly a likeable character though, despite his drug-addled state and consequent violent outbursts there is a kindness in him that wins over. One flaw I would point out in 'The Wrestler' is its curious tangential segments involving Randy's daughter Stephanie (Evan Rachel Wood). While these appear critical to the plot they don't actually advance it whatsoever, nor do they serve to develop the main character. At least not in the way Randy's relationship with retiring stripper Cassidy (Marisa Tomei) does. It's safe to say though that Aronofsky is back in the ring, delivering a redemptive and resounding blow to his critics. A blow made even more poetic by his Venetian exploits last week.

8/10

Please credit JediMoonShyne if you use it, and allow me a shout-out to all the fine people of the IYPC club over at RottenTomatoes.

Cheers!



    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2008 3:13:52 AM CDT

    AVATAR - Fucking our eyeballs in 2009!!!

    by motoko kusanagi

  • Sep 11, 2008 4:01:24 AM CDT

    so he has basically made a jake the snake roberts movie?

    by slappy jones

    can't fucking wait.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2008 4:13:53 AM CDT

    happy for all involved

    by orange cinema

    i will not accept anyone who has been calling this a 'comeback film', for aronofsky, as i don't feel he went anywhere. while the fountain didn't please everyone, i think it's really silly to say his 3rd film launched him off the planet, but the 4th has him landing safely. and as for rourke, it's sounding like this is a role he was born to play. now there is a place to make the 'comeback' remark, but rourke has been back for a few years now, thanks to robert rodriguez.

    @ paragon complex
    nic cage doesn't wish he stuck around, because he very humbly bowed out because he and aronofsky both knew this was a role made for rouke. it was the studio that wasn't confident rouke could carry a film.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2008 5:23:49 AM CDT

    "What is more American than wrestling after all?"

    by gravitysrainbow

  • Sep 11, 2008 7:03:48 AM CDT

    "

    by the new transported man

    -"slams his way into oscar contention"
    -"

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2008 7:04:26 AM CDT

    what?

    by the new transported man

  • Sep 11, 2008 8:13:48 AM CDT

    Marisa Tomei nude = my ass in the theater.

    by stuntcock mike

  • Sep 11, 2008 8:47:01 AM CDT

    Rourke

    by sparhawk38

    I can't help it. I loved him in Sin City. I can't imagine Marv protrayed any better. It is thrilling to see him have an opportunity to do good work.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2008 8:58:56 AM CDT

    if Marissa struts around nekkid like in

    by just pillow talk

    Before the Devil Knows your Dead, I have absolutely no problem with that.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2008 9:31:01 AM CDT

    Darren Aronofsky...t this oft-misjudged director...

    by sutureself

    This must refer to the judgment, oft stated, that Aronofsky is good.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2008 10:41:09 AM CDT

    hyperrealism that was used so effectively in 'Requiem for a Drea

    by speed fricassee

    Ha! Fuck that stinker of a film. Not only is the editing highly, HIGHLY annoying on such a basic level, but I truly don't see what's supposed to be so brilliant about it at all. Slowly sinking to the lowest depths of living hell with no redemption does not a good story make, and it does not warrant (nor produce) a visionary director. I liked The Fountain well enough, but Requiem was some of the nastiest, most useless garbage I've ever been exposed to. Good soundtrack, that's it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2008 11:05:23 AM CDT

    Aronofsky Knows.

    by littlebigthumper

    After only 3 films now on his fourth, Aronofsky is going to get the respect he is due as one of the last true auteurs we have now and days in response to the blockbuster films, comic books, and funny yet contrastingly shallow comedies.Viva La Aranofsky!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2008 12:01:06 PM CDT

    Ebert likes it too

    by bigbadbua

    No offense to the people who have sent in reviews, but Ebert might actually carry some clout with the Academy..... he was the first one I heard calling "Crash" the best of its year, and look what happened. And good for Rourke. He deserves some adulation after all these years.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2008 12:02:30 PM CDT

    WRONG, Requiem...

    by sick fixx

    was supposed to be ugly. Filthy, nasty, dirty and ugly things happening to beautiful characters and there's nothing you can do about it for two hours.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2008 12:10:15 PM CDT

    Sick Fixx

    by speed fricassee

    What am I wrong about? You didn't mention that you thought Requiem was even remotely good, only ugly, which is what I said in the first place.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2008 12:11:03 PM CDT

    million dollar body slammin baby?

    by lordrando

    Isnt that what that crap was about? estranged daughters? End of the road feelings....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2008 3:24:24 PM CDT

    Requiem

    by fartedinthefaceofhollywood

    Requiem for a Dream is a fine film...its just a dark, ugle, gritty, depressing, miserable asshole of a movie thats completely unrewarding to all of its characters (and yes...towards the end when we see flashes of everyones lives flushing down the toilet simoultaneously is a bit too much...especially his mom and the shock treatment). i like the movie, but its not something i can watch over and over...kinda like There Will Be Blood...thats another brilliant but miserable prick of a movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2008 4:03:34 PM CDT

    Randy "The Ram" = Jake "The Snake"?

    by bash_branigan

    Anyone seen the wrestling documentary "Beyond the Mat"? The whole setup described in the review above could be about Jake the Snake in that film. He was a down and out wrestler in ill health, looking for his estranged daughter. I'm just sayin'.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2008 4:13:26 PM CDT

    Whoops

    by bash_branigan

    I see Paragon Complex already beat me to that comment. (Whistles and wanders away)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2008 4:18:12 PM CDT

    I thought THE FOUNTAIN was boring

    by unionjackass.webs.com

    That's all.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2008 4:19:39 PM CDT

    bigbadbua

    by unionjackass.webs.com

    Ebert like VAN HELSING, but didn't like EMPIRE OF THE SUN. Nuff said.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 12, 2008 6:17:28 AM CDT

    I'm not saying any movie titled "The Wrestler"

    by geraldbeans

    I'm sorry but I'm just not. Outside of those meatheads back in high school who were actually *on* the wrestling team, who the fuck cares about wrestling? -- And Mickey Rourke is the white version of Michael Jackson. He just looks weird. Why was this movie made?

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback