Cool News
BUFFY-Loving Hercules Drinks In The New HBO Vampire Series From SIX FEET UNDER Creator Alan Ball: TRUE BLOOD!!
SPOILER ALERT !!
I am – Hercules!!
True Blood 1.1 FAQ
What’s it called?
“Strange Love.”
Who’s responsible?
Alan Ball, screenwriter of “American Beauty” and creator of “Six Feet Under,” directs from his own teleplay. The series is based on a series of novels by Charlaine Harris.
Is it as good as “Six Feet Under”?
Five “True Blood” episodes in, I’m saying not yet.
What’s it about?
A tiny twentysomething blonde with superpowers falls for a hunky 170-year-old vampire.
How does her watcher feel about that?
Sookie Stackhouse (Anna Paquin), who makes her living in Bon Temps, Louisiana’s Hooters-y Merlotte's Bar & Grill, has no watcher. She is not a vampire-slayer. She’s a vampire saver.
Sookie the Vampire Saver? Vampires aren’t evil?
In the universe of “True Blood,” some are and some aren’t, just like the non-vampires.
What are Sookie’s superpowers?
Paquin, no stranger to X-Men, plays a girl with Jean Grey superpowers: She’s telepath and, as best I can tell, capable of telekinesis. (Oddly, Sookie seems unaware of her telekinetic ability, which turns up in the first two episodes, but stays offscreen for the next three.)
If she’s not a vampire slayer, why is there a girl with superpowers in a vampire show?
Five episodes in, there’s no clear reason. We do learn that because vampires are dead and emit no brainwaves, Sookie cannot read their minds.
Are there a lot of vampires in the “True Blood” universe?
We discover over the course of the series that Louisiana is fairly teeming with them.
Are there a lot of superpowered non-vampires in the “True Blood” universe?
In the first five episodes, Sookie is the only one we meet. So I guess the series is similar to “Buffy the Vampire Slayer” in this respect.
How are the “True Blood” vampires similar to the “Buffy” ones?
They “live” for centuries. They’re superstrong. Their hearts don’t beat. They drink blood. They sport retractable fangs. They don’t fly or turn into animals. Sunlight kills them.
How else do the “True Blood” vampires differ from the “Buffy” ones?
1) Everybody in the “True Blood” universe knows vampires are real; the bloodsuckers even have advocates who argue against vampire-discrimination on TV talk shows. They recently started outing themselves following a Japanese firm’s invention of artificial blood, marketed to vampires as a soft drink bearing the brand “Tru Blood.”
2) The “True Blood” vampires all seem to be able to use Jedi-mind-trick like hypnosis to make any human (except Sookie) do whatever they want.
3) The blood inside “True Blood” vampires is a valuable, addictive and illegal narcotic with healing properties. If you can get hold of an adult vampire and drain him, the street value of his blood is around $10,000.
4) The “True Blood” vampires don’t fear the crucifix, and can handle crosses without sustaining injury. They do, however, seem to be vulnerable to silver chains.
5) The “True Blood” vampires don’t have retractable demon-foreheads.
Is there a big bad?
There’s a multi-episode (season-long?) story arc about a series of murders in Bon Temps. Some townsfolk, naturally, suspect vampires, though it’s more likely the work of anti-vamp forces.
This is an HBO show! And an Alan Ball show! Where’s all the gay stuff?
Vampirism is used, not altogether successfully, as a metaphor for homosexuality. And Sookie’s restaurant employs Lafayette, a vulgar, lecherous and flamboyant non-vampire cook who makes no secret of his orientation.
What’s good?
The teaser, featuring a cameo by Bill Maher, effectively sets up the “True Blood” universe. Someone videotapes from truly unsettling vampire sex. Sookie’s high-maintenance best friend Tara and Sookie’s half-wit brother are both drawn broadly but earn solid laughs. So does Merlotte's randy cook, whose entreaties toward a fat customer in bib overalls are a highlight. Paquin looks plenty hot, whether she’s sunning in her bikini or dashing about in her Hooters-y uniform.
What’s not so good?
If I could read minds as efficiently as Sookie, I believe I would hop a bus to Quantico and earn a lot more than $9 an hour consulting for the FBI. Some of the dialogue (perhaps taken from the book?) is surprisingly graceless for a Ball project, and Sookie finds way too hilarious the idea that a vampire could be named “Bill.” There are pacing issues. The mind-reading sequences are awkwardly directed. And there are questions. Why is Sookie seemingly oblivious to the telekinesis that gets her out of jams? If Sookie can’t avoid reading minds, how can she not know her handsome boss Sam is in love with her? After he leaves Tara in charge of the bar, why does it take Sam the better part of an hour to find Sookie in his own smallish parking lot? If vampires can hypnotize people into doing anything, why is Vampire Bill’s safety so easily compromised in the first episode?
Reviews are mixed:
Time Magazine says:
… while writerly honor forbids me to use a "suck" or "bite" joke, the early episodes of True Blood are, shall we say, drained of interest. … Ball's characters, living and dead, are caricatures. He once said the only meddling HBO ever did on SFU was to ask him to make it less conventional, and he could have used that kind of intervention this time. …
The Wall Street Journal says:
… a campy attempt at Southern Gothic that too often passes over the truly macabre or grotesque for gratuitous sex and violence. Mr. Ball is clearly trying to lighten the mood and reach a younger audience. But his new characters lack the depth and complexity -- if not the humanity -- of the darkly comic Fisher family from "Six Feet Under." … "True Blood" is supposed to be a sexy, easy-to-swallow mystery, but too often it ends up leaving a bad taste in one's mouth.
Entertainment Weekly gives it an “C” and says:
… Ball has never seen a comic-dramatic premise he can't flatten with leaden metaphors. He pumps up a tedious subplot about vampires campaigning on TV for antidiscrimination laws. And he makes so many heavy-handed comparisons between vampires and homosexuals that you wonder if he's really never seen Buffy the Vampire Slayer or The Lost Boys. …
USA Today gives it three and a half stars (out of four) and says:
… Sexy, witty and unabashedly peculiar … Ball is a man of many talents, but subtlety does not appear to be one of them, and viewers should keep that in mind. Many of the twists on the vampire minority metaphor are clever — a church billboard reads "God Hates Fangs" — but you do wish Ball would hammer his points home with a slightly smaller hammer. Even so, for a network that has lost its way of late in series, Blood is a much-needed infusion of new, well, blood. Drink up.
TV Guide gives it a nine (out of 10) says:
… Graphically sexy and scary, and often wildly funny …
The New York Times says:
… The tale gets more engrossing as it goes along, but the first five episodes, at least, don’t quite live up to the fierce score and the amazing, hallucinatory opening montage. …
The Los Angeles Times says:
… a heavy-handed political fable … Borrowing heavily from many genres, "True Blood" aspires to transcend them all but instead quickly deposits the viewer waist-deep in a literal and figurative swamp. …
The Chicago Tribune says:
… doesn't seem quite as steamy as it should be. Not a bad show, just not the home run HBO needs. …
The Washington Post says:
… isn't meant to be an exercise in good taste. Just a romp and a wallow -- and a bloody good one. …
The San Francisco Chronicle says:
… Both Paquin and [Stephen] Moyer do well here. And "True Blood" is fleshed out with other interesting characters getting to spout well-written lines. But at times the whole thing seems silly - it's often a default reaction when portraying vampires - and there's still the issue of tone: Will it settle or will the disparate mix continue to clash? At this point, "True Blood" appears to be a creative experiment. Ball should at least be given the chance to prove further whether he can slay viewers with his vision.
The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette says:
… lands squarely in the B+/A- realm inhabited by HBO's underrated polygamy drama, "Big Love." Like "Big Love," "True Blood" entertains without moody navel-gazing. …
The Boston Herald says:
… Most viewers will find the slow pace bewildering and the attempts to establish atmosphere mystifying. … Not quite a parody and not quite a supernatural thriller, “True Blood” will probably just leave you cold.
The Boston Globe says:
… You won't be drawn to "True Blood" if you don't like a heightened, almost cartoonish atmosphere. Paquin, giggly but calmly assertive, is something of an acquired taste as Sookie. To me, her overdone Southern accent has a comic emphasis, in the same way Kyra Sedgwick speaks with almost campy delight in "The Closer." I kept imagining Amy Poehler from "Saturday Night Live" mocking Paquin's drawl, but that never detracted from my enjoyment. Alas, Moyer, a Brit, has less luck with his accent, as well as with his characterization. He makes Bill too dreamily ethereal, and I hope his performance grows more vivid and grounded with time. If we're going to be emotionally engaged by this couple, in the way we were by Rachel Griffiths and Peter Krause in "Six Feet Under," we need to see him as more than a vague specter. There isn't enough Buffy-Angel charge between the pair, yet. …
Variety says:
… while the show is a trifle hokey, its soapy elements, gothic atmosphere and cliffhanger endings -- coupled with Anna Paquin’s knockout performance -- do reel viewers in, laying the groundwork for what may be the cultish, undemanding romp HBO needs to inject much-needed life into its lineup. …
The Hollywood Reporter says:
… with its constant profanity, gore and banal cruelty, will have a limited appeal. It might become appointment viewing for genre fans even as the rest of us steer clear of Bon Temps. …
9 p.m. Sunday. HBO.
Dracula’s Hilarious Return!!
Buffy's Shocking Post-Spike Romance!!
Season Eight: Volume Three!!
$4.99: Miller’s Crossing!!
195-Title Big DVD Dale!!
-
+ Expand All
-
SUPERNATURAL. Watch it.
-
I feel like there's a good show in here somewhere but it just hasn't completely gelled. Obviously I was hoping to hear in the first few episodes it would get better but if after five its still in question I am losing my optimism. Cable series tend to go about 12-13 episodes a season so they really don't have much time to turn it around. Anna Paquin is really the reason to watch this show, Bill is extremely wooden. I plan to watch this tomorrow night because I know they went back and redid some of the pilot but I'm going to assume a John From Cincinnati one season on this show.
-
I'll sample this though.
-
From the books: Sam is a lycanthrope/shifter. He turns into a dog in the novels. Sookie has difficulty reading the minds of any supernatural being, so it's easier for them to block their thoughts from her.
I love the books, and I'm really looking forward to this show. -
Herc, answers to some of your questions will probably come out later. If they go by the books, which it looks like they are, it comes out later. Like why Sookie is just a cocktail waitress and not in Quantico. Why a telepath is important to the Vamp community. Why she has no idea that Sam is in love with her even though she is a telepath..... The first season looks like the first book, so some of this may not come out until season 2, though.
-
I'm not much of a Anna Paquin fan and generally dislike southern accents and settings.
Also most reviews are either mostly negative or say its bland.
If it gets a 2nd season I may rent the DVD's.
Until then, gonna give it a pass -
...and it was ok. It seems like it has a lot of potential...and it seems that it could also go the other way and be stupid.
Also, why an FBI consultant? You could make a ton of money playing poker in Vegas. -
I absolutely LOVED the first five minutes of the pilot. Pitch perfect. The tone was a perfect blend of satire, tension, dark humor, and plain old fashioned terror. The next 50 minutes are nowhere near as good.
-
Anita Blake. Slayer. Lives in Louisiana. Some vampires are good, some evil. Pretty much the same rules. She had some powers, but so did some other non-Vamps. Sounds a LOT like Anita Blake. Still, I hate vampire shows. Buffy notwithstanding, most vampire shows...and I can't believe I'm actually SAYING this...suck. I know, I had to go there.
-
I guarantee it. Just as I guarantee JK Rowling is going to write plenty more Harry Potter related product and service books (especially after her first non-Potter book bombs). Hell, I think I saw one the other day, it was some kind of side adventure called Hermione's Heavy Flow or something...
-
Yikes! I would think gratuitous sex n' violence Cable Buffy would be a gimme. Hot young women get their omnisexual exploitative gorno on? How can you fuck that up?
-
if it was Sarah Michelle Gellar getting it on with David boreanaz on HBO, it would be a gimme. Because the sex and nudity would just be added to a show that already includes amazing dialogue and great characterization. It appears that in this case, the sex and violence is on top of some bland characters saying bad dialogue. Kinda disappointing, I am a Buffy and SFU fan who was really looking forward to this. I will watch and reserve judgement for myself though.
-
Didnt Buffy get some pretty dang bad reviews during its first season as well? My memory aint great but I seem to remember the critics not being quite as gung ho about the show as they are now looking back at it calling one of the biggest cult shows of all time and whatnot.
-
I watched this at the beginning of the summer, and thought it was terrible. I like the books, but I feel like aspects of the story that work fine in the novels (because you can basically skim or ignore them) are annoying as hell in the tv show.
I'm not sure what the heck Herc is talking about, but Sookie does not have any telekinetic powers. And, as someone mentioned, the reason you don't see Sam for half an hour after he leaves the bar, is because he is the dog that shows up to help Sookie. -
it was a little lame, so i hope they did in fact reshoot it
oh and anna paquin's bucktooth mouth is some nasty shit -
I never was that attracted to Anna Paquin until I saw her in this.
-
isn't in this?
-
But I'd rather be seeing a Buffyverse show from Whedon on HBO.
-
But the 1st episode plays more to the lifetime crowd.
If your favorite Buffy episodes involved Buffy & Angel doing the sad, sad break up stuff, True Blood is probably for you.
If your favorite Buffy episodes were any of the other episodes, True Blood is going to bore you.
And any reviewer that gave this show a 9 out 10 or 3-4 stars, needs to be drug tested. The show is at best a 2 to 2.5, if you love vampires or lifetime. If you tend to love action or guy type stuff, this show is a 0.5 to 1.0 star show. -
her best african american generic smart mouth friend is annoying as hell. And Vampires are lame. Vampires are the new Harry Potter (uh, lets all have fantasies about people with super powers cause our lives sucks!). Lame, lame, lame.
-
Gonna give it a shot and hope for the best.
-
That's disappointing. What's the point in that? Regular looking people standing around drinking blood is pretty weak allegory. I'll check it out just to see Sgt. Brad Colbert from Gen Kill but ....
-
I'm a big fan of Alan Ball, but I'm getting mixed feelings about this new show. On one hand, I'm excited he's making a low-restriction show on HBO with lovely Anna Paquin, but on the other hand, I'm not much of a fan of vampires anymore. I've already seen everything they are, everything they're ever going to be. Vampires kind of bore me now. "Salem's Lot," "Nosferatu," and seven seasons of "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" are about as good as it'll ever get. Ball will have to crank "True Blood" up to eleven to tweak my interest.
We'll see if he does.
-
The books have a southern humor to them that the shows unfortunately do not. The problem is the books are in first person, so you get all of Sookie's thoughts. That's the best part of the story. It's a real fun read. The show is telling 2/3rd of the story, so I wish it well, but it's definately not as good as the books.
-
the show was unremittingly awful. And if it wasn't for leches like this reviewer drooling over Paquin's 'innocent' slutty clothes ensembles it probably would have been binned.
The writing is stunningly bad, the vampire can't act and the bar owner is clearly the dog (or was that not supposed to be bleedin' obvious?).
The annoying thing? The comment above is right - for about 3 minutes it actually looked like an interesting premise. -
this book series, or the Twilight saga, but either way it sounds like one author, ahem, "borrowed" heavily from the other. Stephenie Meyer can keep claiming that she's never read another work of vampire fiction in her life all she wants to, but i call bullshit. too much of her work is drawn from anne rice and poppy brite for that to be true. this just sounds like Twilight in the deep south to me. or maybe Twilight was just True Blood in the upper NW.
-
you're kidding right? Anna Paquin is uberhot! Check her out in X-Men leather.
-
Moonlight (Forever Knight remake) and that other one where the guy lives forever in Cincinnati (I think) failed last season and are enough.
-
Captain Justice
-
Um, it's a bit too much like Buffy for me.
-
First Moonlight *cough*Angle*cough* and now this. When will they ever learn.
-
Because it didn't. I was well entertained. I see all of this someone bit off of so-and-so- maybe you cats spend way too much time watching vampire shows. Not everyone dove headfirst into Buffy and Moonlight and all that watered down commercial tv bullshit. Sex, cursing, and violence- is it really necessary? This is a fucking vampire show. Of course its necessary. Campy? Sure. A little. It's not trying to be an arthouse remodeling of vampires. A straight out metaphor for gays? That's a short cut to thinking- and the new cool homophobic 12 year old way to bash anything with a unknown and feared agent sideplot. Corny. Grow the fuck up. If Ball- gay himself- wanted a straight up metaphor for gays he'd pick something a little less threatening than vampires. Or is that too complicated a thought for you fucking toolsheds?
-
Ball has said himself that the series is an allegory for homosexuality. Its not made up by people on an AICN talkback so chill out. And the success of both Buffy and Angel shows that sex and violence is NOT necessarty to tell a good vampire story on tv. Watered down or not, they both were ten times better than this show was.
-
Anna Paquin looks odd as a blonde.
-
Squeal like a pig.
Cripes this show fucking sucks. Ha! -
But to be fair I've always been a sucker for vampire stories. I'll tune in next week and I'm interested to see where everything goes from here.
I'm guessing more freaky vampire sex. -
If you've read them, you'll definitely see similarities between them and Buffy, but only in the sense that there is humor and drama and lots of supernatural beings. Beyond that, not so much.
Not sure what Harry was referring to when he spoke of her telekinetic powers. That is definitely not in the book and I didn't see it in this first episode.
And Sam did find her fairly quickly in the parking lot, you just didn't realize it, heh.
I was waiting to be somewhat disappointed by the show, but actually enjoyed it. You should check the books out, they are pretty fun for a light summer read. -
Well if the main character didnt have telekenesis then someone does, because I remember that chain flying from her hand and wrapping itself around the bald guys neck. And then his wife/ girlfriend asking why he cant just pull the chain off as they ran away. She may not be telekinteic in the books but she appears to be in the show.
-
then I'm not to fired up about it. After reading above some of the tidbits of reviews some of them mentioned that could very well be the case. I checked it out didn't like the "angry black chick" Anna does look odd as a blond and hated the intro we'll be seeing every time the shows on. Some of the accents were atrocious but who knows? It's only the first show and those are always hit or miss when you're attempting to set up the characters and whatnot. All in all, I'm not sold one way or another.
-
I watched the preair and the chain thing was caused by the creepy vampire woman hiding in the bushes (spying) which for some reason they decided to cut out in this final version. They also got rid of the hot black chick who plays Paquin's best friend and replaced her with fucgly's even uglier sister.
-
that there were other groups before gays that were discriminated against, right? Lol. Other than that- bashing a show this ludicrously after ONE episode is ridiculous. Compare ONE show to a complete series of Buffy- right on. And imascoob- who already sounded like a fucking maroon on the entourage thread- you say a watered down vampire show is ten times better- I say it's trash. Difference of opinion on that one is all.
-
What show were you watching? No graphic sex and violence, of course, but there was plenty of both. Spike humping Buffy outside the doublemeat palace pushed the envelope for broadcast, i thought, and the violence seemed to get ratcheted up a bit every year.
So, to sum up, you dont know what the fuck youre talking about.
End transmission -
Oh and would someone please ban the assholes that are giving away spoilers? Not cool
-
which I believe was a first for broadcast tv.
-
The show seems more or less an allegory for race relations (as well as homosexuality), but I think to tie everything up so simply is to do a disservice to yourself. The show doesn't take itself quite so seriously...
Not to mention, comparing it to Buffy at this point horrible. By comparison we should compare just the first half of Buffy's pilot, and this episode. I'd say it's a draw based on just those episodes... Buffy didn't achieve greatness until well into season 2. It achieved fairly "good" status at the end of season 1.
Regarding telekinesis, (SPOILER) in the books Sookie has something of a fairy godmother who protects her. This character doesn't show up until like the 4th book or so, but they obviously meant for the chain to be caused by her. Not sure why it was cut out of the episode (more mystery?) but trust me, Sookie isn't telekinetic. -
Fucking please.
-
...but it hasn't been revealed yet. It shows up midway through the first book. I really like the books, and I'm hoping that the series'll live up to 'em. But telekinesis? I'm gonna have to re-watch; I didn't see anything move-y when I was watching.
-
...are played out. Especially gay, pretty-boy, goth vampires. Weak!
-
meant graphic nudity, f-bombs and realistic violence- of which there's more in of True Blood's first hour than there is in Buffy's whole run. Of course- these elements aren't the ONLY thing that make a horror-themed show great- great writing too. But yeah let's knock a set-up episode like the whole fucking series has run its course- let's call all the characters viewed in the 1st hour of a 12 hour season as flat and one dimensional. And btw- "end transmission" is about the corniest fucking way to end a post I've thus seen.
-
Just in case you were wondering ArmandVA, Charlaine Harris' Sookie books came out well before Stephenie Meyer's crapfests. Vampires that have to avoid the sun because they "sparkle like diamonds"? Wow. That movie's gonna be shite.
-
and that's saying something.
-
agreeing with Panda- I saw the Twilight trailer and wow it looks like the most pretentious hunk of shit.
Laserhead- you sound foolish. You should probably post less. -
Most of the complaints were based on a leaked pilot episode- which was probably leaked for the specific purpose of fixing the complaints. For instance I read that the thoughts Sookie reads out of others' minds weren't audible- I heard every word last night clearly.
-
Big fan of vampire books, movies, and usually TV shows, and Twilight was no exception although it was on the lower end. I call vampire media my "guilty pleasure" but Twilight was even more so because of the over-the-top romantic elements (a little gushy at times). However the latest book was TERRIBLE. I wish I could go into more detail but it would be a HUGE spoiler. Basically the main "new character" if you will is just about the silliest thing I've ever heard and he/she (some people would be mad if I just gave away the gender) is the main point of the book. And, although I'll definitely give it a chance, the movie looks disturbingly awful. Charlaine Harris' books (I only read the first in the Sookie Stackhouse series) is a little better because it doesn't take itself so seriously, but it didn't have enough to keep my attention. "True Blood" is a little more interesting, but vampires with thick southern accents just make me LMAO and "Bill" is not attractive at all (of course with a name like Bill what do you expect?) I'll watch for a while but I'm not expecting much and if the books cuoldn't hold my attention long I doubt the show can. Oh, and I thought that Sookie DID hear Sam? Wasn't there a whole scene in his office where she was talking to him and psycho black woman and she kept hearing him say how much he loves her? Or am I confusing characters?
-
I liked the guys fangs popping out accompanied by the sound effect of a switchblade....or Wolverine's retractable claws. I liked that Sookie is a pretty innocent character - "Don't say the J-word!" and I liked her bloody beat down at the end. That was the tiny hook that will probably make me watch next week. That's actually not a lot of things....I'm hoping it builds.
-
Did she have breast reduction? I could've sworn her funbags were more swollen.
-
Correct- Sookie did in fact hear Sam's thoughts.
-
I was pretty ambivalent through the whole episode but the ending was definitely enough of a snag to tune into the next episode. And the obligatory boobs and fangbanging was only a slight distraction from the horrible fake accents. Thanks to all the spoliers of those that have read the books certain parts make more sense now. Too bad they didnt make sense as stand alones. All in all, it felt forced. We got glimpses of things that felt Alan Ball-like but it didnt really feel like something that had his stamp on it.
-
are always the most "forced" of all episodes- They are strictly there to setup all of the main storylines- introduce quickly as many characters as possible and attempt to establish a different world. I don't know what you guys were expecting honestly- but it seems like unrealistic expectations.
-
All the questions brought up are answered later in the books. The first few episodes are kind of clunky but I have faith it will straighten out. One change I would make is to either heighten the camp of subdue it.
-
Really just a sorry excuse for an actress. Her best work was undoubtedly The Piano, and nothing has been good since.
-
I thought there were some pretty funny scenes in the show. But the one aspect that is really pissing me off so far is the Telekinesis. It just doesn't feel right in this show, and is poorly implemented.
I'll watch again though. -
that the show is based on....Nice take on the supernatural world....I'll be interested if the show can match the strength of the book...so far,its so-so, as it lack the clear explanation for whats going on...Such as the Fact, that Sookie CAN"T block out peoples thoughts, hearimng them all the time, leading the locals to think she's crazy,and causing her to live a somewhat sheltered life- hence the reason she's still a virgin-how you like to be with someone and hear ALL there thoughts??
-
The pilot (just watched it) was pretty bad. That said, I'm definitely gonna give it another episode or three to find its tone and to see where it's heading. It gotz supernatural stuff! I hafta give it a chance! Also, as a gay guy, I'm hoping either Lafayette (the flamin', mouthy short-order cook) turns out to have some depth, or the show introduces another queer person or two, maybe one of 'em not being a total douche! And maybe just some characters I can care about in general, straight or gay..
-
Sucked monkey balls sorry but Angel's crown remain's intact as the best Vampire show. The gay dude is annoying as fuck and Sookies best friend was well cast in the pre-air and then re-cast with an actress who's mission it seems is to irritate all humanity.The central Vampire is also played badly too much 90210 teenage angst when he's supposed to be like a 100 odd year old Vamp.The Dog steal's every scene its in, that says it all really.
Readers Talkback
User Login
Top Talkbacks
- Whitney Houston 1963 - 2012 -- 325 total posts 322 posts
- New JUDGE DREDD post production footage pops up -- 106 total posts 106 posts
- HANNA's Saoirse Ronan to boss around seven little people -- 63 total posts 60 posts
- Does ‘SNL’ Rhyme With ‘Deschanel’?? Learn Which SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE Vet Hosts After Sexy Zooey!! -- 74 total posts 58 posts
- There's a STAR TREK video game that is going to lead into JJ's STAR TREK 2 apparently... -- 159 total posts 51 posts
- If the Behind the Scenes Pics of the Day drops her pen, pick it up, but don’t look at her legs or else it will be on your record. -- 47 total posts 41 posts
- AVENGERS enemy revealed as pink boardgame pieces... You might suffer some form of elation... SPOILERS!!! -- 161 total posts 34 posts
- To Commemorate The 3D Release Of STAR WARS EPISODE I: THE PHANTOM MENACE, George Lucas Wants You To Know...Greedo Shoots First!! -- 488 total posts 33 posts
- Friday Brings SWEEPS DAY NINE!! Gab Here About Tonight’s FRINGE!! Plus Einstein on TIM, Wiig On PORTLANDIA, MAHER, CLONE, GIFTED, GRIMM, SPARTACUS, SUPERNATURAL, GOLD RUSH And More!! -- 121 total posts 23 posts
- Here's The Red Band Trailer For Drafthouse Films' THE FP! -- 70 total posts 20 posts