Logo

Cool News

The Northlander Returns With A Review Of ARN 2: ARN HARDER!

Published at:  Aug 25, 2008 2:29:25 AM CDT

Hey, everyone. ”Moriarty” here.

Well, since TheNorthlander was the one person who reviewed ARN: THE KNIGHT TEMPLAR for us, it makes sense that he'd be the one to review the sequel for us as well.

Sure enough, here he is. I'm still not sure if we'll ever see these get a release stateside, but in Sweden, these are big news:



Hey guys. The Northlander here.

A couple of months ago I sent in a review of a Swedish movie called ARN: THE KNIGHT TEMPLAR, which together with its sequel is the most expensive and ambitious production in Swedish cinema yet. I also brooded a bit about how and why this film came to be, and I still stand by what I said back then.

Nnow the second half of this two parter is opening here, and it's relevant to you because this is something they're trying to sell internationally as well. So here is my review of ARN 2: THE KINGDOM AT ROAD'S END (or as the folks at Disney would have called it - 2RN)

ARN 2 is basically a continuation of the first film, and while on the whole I can actually say it's better (or at least not as bad); it's not "T2" better. More like "ATTACK OF THE CLONES" better, if you get my drift.

*** Spoilers below: ***

Ok here's the story. ARN 2 starts off several years after the first one left off, although nothing has really happened and we don't know how long it has been. Arn is still in the Jerusalem desert fighting the same guy, his girl is still home in Sweden forced to live in the same convent as a nun. Arn has a slight beard now though. That mean old nun who hated his girl Cecilia, she dies in the beginning and due to political circumstances too messy to explain in a review, Stellan Skarsgård pushes Cecilia to take the old head nun's place. She refuses however and leaves the convent to wait for Arn's expected return even though nobody even knows if he's alive or dead.After leaving the convent she is finally reunited with her and Arn's son Magnus, who was born in the last film. Although Cecilia and Arn look pretty much the same age, or maybe a few years older than last time we saw them, their son is now played by a 25 year old guy made to look like he's supposed to be playing much younger. It's a bit confusing and I'm not sure exactly how much later this is supposed to be to be honest. Meanwhile, Arn tries to get out of Jerusalem and back to Sweden and when the templars are defeated and he survives, due to his good personal relationship with his enemy, he gets his chance. The Danish invade Sweden and at this point Arn returns (He now has more beard) and that's pretty much the setup for Act 2.

So there you have the basic premise. Confused? Yeah. Me too. See here's the thing. This plot, the whole two films that are based on two books, is a boring mess. It's not exciting enough to be a good drama and it's not a documentary. It almost feels like one of those fake midieval villages you can go to that are never that fun or educational. We finally have a bad guy here though, the Danish King and his right hand man are good bad guys in this film and much needed because the first film didn't have any real antagonist for Arn's hero at all. I mean, a lot of this story is Man vs Society, but there's no one real true antagonist to represent the Society so he never feels like a hero. There are a few small obstacles and stuff but it's too much obsessed with being true to the actual historical events to ever become exciting.

There are some good things to say about this sequel though. Stellan Skarsgård is good although he still gets too little screen time. It's not quite as bad as the first movie. It ties everything together surprisingly well in the end (McKee would be proud at how well the third act actually work compared to the rest). There's a very nice moment in the beginning where Arn's horse is murdered by someone and he comforts it as it passes away. But on the whole these things are not really enough for me to recommend this to anyone but die hard Jan Guilliou fans.

Jan Guillou is the guy who wrote the novel. Speaking of him, as a companion piece to this review, I found an article with a small Q&A with Jan Guillou in today's edition of Swedish newspaper METRO and I thought I'd translate the whole thing just for you guys. First off, Guillou is probably one of the most successful authors from here, not sure if you ever saw the movie EVIL (directed by Mikael Håfström of 1408 fame), which got an Oscar nomination for best foreign language film 2004. He's also written the books about Hamilton, which the 2001 film starring Peter Stormare with Mark Hamill as the bad guy.

So this is from today's Metro (I thought some of this was funny):
(this article was written by Peter Lindholm at Swedish Metro and translated by me)

HOLLYWOOD WANTED TO MAKE ARN... but Ridley Scott couldn't get hold of Jan GuillouARN could have been a Hollywood production. Famous director Ridley Scott was curious about Jan Guillou's novels but never managed to get hold of the author. Instead, he made the similar KINGDOM OF HEAVEN.

"That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard! Just call the publisher. Amateurs!" says a surprised Jan Guillou. Oscarwinning sound editor Per Hallberg tells Metro Hollywood tried to get in touch with Jan Guillou a few years ago. The subject matter was of interest to Ridley Scott.

He talked about how he wanted to make a film about the crusades, but Guillou was a hard man to find. So he gave up after a while. Instead Ridley Scott - the man behind ALIEN, THELMA & LOUISE and GLADIATOR - made KINGDOM OF HEAVEN in 2005.

"It was good in the way that it wasn't a racist film but there were too many stupid historical inaccuracies in it. This is way too complicated material to get in the hands of the Americans," says Jan Guillou.

But wouldn't you have liked to see ARN as a Hollywood movie?

"No, I'm not sure I would have agreed to that. There would have been too many political changes, additions and so many historical inaccuracies. But it was nice not having to deal with that problem."

"Wouldn't you have liked to see Orlando Bloom as Arn?"

"Eh. No. Haha. And not Brad Pitt either. I happen to think the Arn movie is better than KINGDOM OF HEAVEN."


So, there you have it. Not sure how true any of that Ridley Scott talk is, but this is certainly a story that he would have handled better and it could have used a lot of historical inaccuracies if it had made the story less boring if you ask me. Go see Mongol instead. Or I hear the director's cut of KINGDOM OF HEAVEN is supposed to be really awesome. Well that's about it. In a few weeks I'll send in a review of a new Swedish vampire movie called VAMPYRER. I know next to nothing about that one, but there's another one called LET THE RIGHT ONE IN (also a new Swedish vampire movie) that's awesome like a mother pus bucket. See it at Fantastic fest, and read the novel.

Seriously, I mean that.

Until then, folks.
/TheNorthlander


    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Aug 25, 2008 2:40:55 AM CDT

    Kingdom of heaven

    by gym

    Are comparisons to Troy justified?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 25, 2008 3:20:14 AM CDT

    This Guillou guy sounds like a fucking dick.

    by powereduppacman

    "This is way too complicated material to get in the hands of the Americans" Christ dude, who's the racist here? And I'm not even from America. You can go and stick you stupid historical inaccuracies where the sun don't shine. At least Scott knows how to make a movie. If I want historical accuracies I´ll read a fucking book (not yours btw). Anyway, I hope the movie is better than this review says (probaly not though) cause we need more european hack and slash dagnabbit! Good for you Swedes! Make another I say. Practice makes perfect, Rome wasn´t built in a day and all that crap. We could also use a good Kelt flick. You hear that Irish? Kelts! With warpaint! Hacking the fuck out of people! Ok, I feel better now...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 25, 2008 3:52:43 AM CDT

    Guillou

    by the dark shite

    He does sound like a dick the way he says it, but he also has a point about historical innaccuracies in Hollywood movies.

    I mean personally I don't care as long as the movie's good, but if you look at the likes of Braveheart & The Last Samurai, they give totally fictional accounts of historical events & as a (fairly crap wannabe) writer myself, I say if they're his books, I suppose he has a right to want to safeguard historical accuracies that he probably spent a long time researching.

    I've seen the first film though & it's shit. So if his books are anything like the films, maybe he should just shut the fuck up, sell them to Hollywood & count the money he'd be very lucky to have.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 25, 2008 3:55:39 AM CDT

    AND

    by the dark shite

    Ridley Scott ain't American anyway.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 25, 2008 4:13:24 AM CDT

    "Let the right one in" is NOT good!

    by variosod

    Saw a preview of the film 2Let the right one in" in december 2007. A comment from an elder man behind me: "This is the worst trash I've seen". Comment from you man next to me: "This was so boring"
    The movie doesn't know what audience to play to. I saw it with a friend who is a director, and the both of us concluded that the concept is good, but the film is too slow for the younger audience and to gory/sick for the older audience. It also had severe structural problems.
    Now, we saw it quite long ago, but then the filmmaker said that the film was finished, just the special effects were left. The preview screening we went to was to get info for marketing issues. There were NO questions after that even suggested they would change anything in the film.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 25, 2008 4:22:11 AM CDT

    LET THE RIGHT ONE IN

    by rost

    is great! He's right about that one.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 25, 2008 4:38:41 AM CDT

    variosod

    by thenorthlander

    where was this screening held?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 25, 2008 4:48:21 AM CDT

    Guillou

    by thenorthlander

    Is a dick. His books are probably way better than the films that are based on them, he IS one of the very few people here who can actually make a living as an author. I guess you can say the same for Stephen King though (except King doesn't seem to be a dick).

    His problem is that he doesn't seem to know anything about movies or doesn't care to. (Yes, Scott is NOT an american).
    I mean, when it comes to drama (or fiction) there is One genre, and One genre only - and that's fantasy.
    It's all fantasy, and when you tell a fictional story or a dramatization of real events you need to make it relevant to the reciever. The people in the movie theater watching that movie needs to connect with what they're seeing through the story and Arn is not even halfway there (might be because of Guillou's influence, I dunno).
    You can't just show a bunch of events the way they occured no matter how dramatical they may have been.
    That's where the historical inaccuracies come in - you need to change and adapt the events into a story that makes sense and is relevant to the viewer.

    I've heard something about an international cut of ARN, and I hope that will be better but I doubt it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 25, 2008 4:50:11 AM CDT

    "Let the right one in" is an amazing film!

    by koola_norway

    Wow, what happened here? "Let the right one in" is a complete masterpiece - I've seen it twice this year, in two seperate film festivals in different European countries, and the reactions were stellar - the film is totally unique, both a beautiful coming-of-age story, a gory horror film, a philosophical vampire tale... it has every side of a complex story.

    I'm anticipating seeing it for the third time when it finally has a theatrical premiere in Norway (and Scandinavia) in October.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 25, 2008 6:35:57 AM CDT

    Guillou IS a dick...

    by docpazuzu

    ...for many reasons, one of them being how he infamously got up and left the auditorium in 2001 when a silent minute was held for the victims of 9-11 at the Swedish National Book and Library Convention.

    He's a complete cunt.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 25, 2008 6:38:12 AM CDT

    re Let The Right One In

    by docpazuzu

    The book was amazing and if the film is even half as good it should be great.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 25, 2008 7:30:23 AM CDT

    such confusing posts these days!?

    by filmfunk

  • Aug 25, 2008 9:53:01 AM CDT

    Screening of Let the right one in

    by variosod

    It was held at Grand (Sveavägen 45) on December 3rd 2007 in the evening. They showed us a DVD-work-in-progress copy.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 25, 2008 9:58:51 AM CDT

    I really need to be the first one to make a

    by coltcco

    "Pumping Arn" joke. Just say it with the right southern accent.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 25, 2008 11:50:26 AM CDT

    Guillou is a drama queen...

    by bustanut

    But he's funny and entertaining as hell. He always makes dramatic statements whenever the press wants him to have an opinion on something. As the one The northlander had in his review.

    The funniest happened when the movie EVIL was nominated for an Oscar and Guillou wasn't invited to the ceremony by the moviemakers. Needless to say all hell broke loose. Guillou made daily dramatic rants in the press about how he would stop the filmatisation of the ARN books, stop working with people and i even think he threatened to leave the country. The thing is, im not sure on this one, he's not allowed to visit the USA. So even if he was invited he wouldn't had been able to come to the oscars anyway.

    On Oscars night he invited the press to a private Oscars celebration party at his mansion where he and his wife (the only two at the party) had dressed up for the ocation and a ridiculous article was published where he talked about his feelings on the whole event. The thing is, he is so self-absorbed he didn't even realize how much of a fool he made of him self. Takes himself waaay too seriously...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 25, 2008 1:20:30 PM CDT

    Guillou = Misinformed [a mild statement]

    by halberd

    KoH Director's Cut should completely convert former naysayers of the theatrical cut... but as a Scott/epic/period fan the original had already graced my dvd collection. Now I'm a proud owner of both the original and DCut releases. And I love Guillou's 'Brad Pitt' plug as if Troy holds a dying candle to KoH. This is absolutely ridiculous. I will still venture in checking out this Arn two-part effort [didn't see the first installment yet] but unfortunately I'm going to be viewing them with Guillou being a gigantic, misinformed dick in mind.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 25, 2008 4:59:10 PM CDT

    DocPazuzu

    by snapcase

    I was there when he walked out of the hall during the silent minute. I thought ha was a dick then but in retrospect i now understand that he was one of the few who understood the real meaning of 9/11. He saw "pax" americana long before the rest of us did.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 25, 2008 5:10:47 PM CDT

    snapcase

    by docpazuzu

    That's beside the point. You can honor the murdered innocents and still be opposed to American policies. He's a dick, even in retrospect.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 25, 2008 5:18:16 PM CDT

    Besides...

    by docpazuzu

    ...Guillou has always disliked the U.S., certainly long before 9-11. He wasn't being particularly prescient, just snooty because he didn't like the sympathy the U.S. was getting at the time.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 25, 2008 9:51:54 PM CDT

    "Film is Okee-dokee" - Swedish Chef

    by memeovore

    Gersh gurndy morn-dee burn-dee, burn-dee, vorn-shed-ee, dorn-shed,ee... boc! boc! boc!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2008 4:14:41 PM CDT

    Guillou

    by jixashauser

    any swede knows that he´s a complete douche!

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback