Logo

Cool News

M. Night’s HAPPENING Tonight, And You Guys Are Weighing In!

Published at:  Jun 12, 2008 4:14:16 AM CDT

SPOILER ALERT !!

Hey, everyone. ”Moriarty” here.

Not sure if they’re screening this for the Austin crew or not, but I’m going to pay to see it at the midnight show in Woodland Hills so I can review it tomorrow night.

Fox has been screening it a bit, though, and several of you have sent us reviews now, so it’s time to do a round-up of several of the best for you, with reactions all over the map.

Here’s Latauro with his take on things to kick us off:



I used to say that M. Night Shyamalan should be president of his own fan club. A recent interview in an Australian magazine changed my mind on this. I think he's overqualified for the job. He's got a lot of chutzpah to keep talking about how great he is, especially given that he gets louder the worse his films get.

I don't have any hate for the man, mind you. In fact, I've long been in his corner. I loved SIXTH SENSE and I loved UNBREAKABLE, and I was, for a short time, a SIGNS apologist. Then THE VILLAGE happened. I maintained that even though his scripts were getting worse, his direction was improving. In some ways, his filmmaking skills were improving with every outing. I continued this line with LADY IN THE WATER, even though his directing hadn't really improved since the last film. That didn't bother me much, though. It has a narrative to maintain, and that narrative involved searching for redemption within a career that was self-imploding.

THE HAPPENING destroys all this. It is by far the worst MNS film to date, as the direction has gone the way of the scriptwriting. I know it sounds like I'm reveling what is clearly about to be an evisceration, but I think he's got a lot of talent and I really hate having to talk about yet another failure in a long line of failures. God, I really hate it... but I gotta be honest.

Mark Wahlberg plays a science teacher. We know this because he keeps saying "science" and "scientific" a lot, words that are said a lot in films by characters who don't sound anything like scientists. His best friend, John Leguizamo, is a maths teacher. We know this because he keeps saying "math" and "statistics" a lot. He also uses mathematical riddles at inappropriate times, because he is Maths Guy, and this script is full of lazy shorthand.

Wahlberg struggles through dialogue ranging from supposedly complex scientific formula to "Oh no!". This is not the Wahlberg from THE DEPARTED. This is the Wahlberg from THE PERFECT STORM, hopelessly at the mercy of his script and director. Here, he plays a character we are completely unable to connect with. You know how MNS's previous characters (Willis in SIXTH SENSE, Willis in UNBREAKABLE, Giamatti in LADY IN THE WATER) were inaccessible, and that was the point of the character? It now seems as if he's just unable to write actual characters that we can feel emotion for. Or perhaps it was just a poor marriage of material and actor. I don't know. All I know is that Wahlberg's stiltedness is overshadowed only by Zooey Deschenal's stiltedness. Deschanel plays a character who is actually supposed to be stilted, and she clearly does a very good job at following the direction she's given, and, not surprisingly, it's the direction I'm calling into question. She's a muddle of a character, who seems to suggest she has an arc in there somewhere, even though we can't quite see it.

This film wants very badly to be WAR OF THE WORLDS, but misses every mark that WOTW hit. The "scares" are more comical than frightening, the characters are, without exception, unlikable, and the whole central idea of "It's the plants!" never progresses beyond the silliness it suggests. (For the record, I think "it's the plants!" could have been cool, but just isn't. The only way it could have been more ridiculous is if he'd had a talkbacker yelling "Plant!" a lot. Yes, go on, you know you want to.)

When greeted with a massive success so early on, I've noticed a lot of filmmakers begin to believe their own hype. MNS's fingers-in-ears approach to criticism seems to fuel this. A part of me believes this is the last film both written and directed by him that we'll see for a very long time, maybe forever. And yes, I'm reading the AIRBENDER stories alongside everyone else, but I can't picture anyone giving him a budget after this film.

Funnily enough, I actually think this is designed as a slow-burn comeback film. From the way he approaches the subject matter, it seems as if he really believes this -- or something very similar -- will happen within the next few years. It feels a little like it's supposed to eventually be a "See? He was right all along!" forcing us to re-evaluate our opinions on the man. (Of course, most of us will be walking backwards and committing suicide at this point, so it hardly matters.) Then, presumably, that will force us to re-evaluate his prediction from LADY IN THE WALKER: that he will one day be considered a man with world-changing talent.

It's speculation, of course, but if I'm right, it makes this utter disaster of a film even sadder than it was to sit through.

Peace out,

Latauro
AICNDownunder@hotmail.com


Yeeeesh. So far, I’ve seen some radically different reactions to this. Jeff Wells compared it to THE DAY THE EARTH STOOD STILL, while David Poland said it felt like watching someone’s career end before your eyes.

Let’s take another reader review, this one from a new semi-frequent overseas contributor, TheNorthlander:



Hey guys, The Northlander here.
Thought I'd send in my thoughts on M. Night Shyamalan's THE HAPPENING.

Now, Night is a guy I despite myself have immense respect for as a filmmaker. When I first saw THE SIXTH SENSE in theaters I was blown away by it and wanted to immediately go back into the theater and rewatch it again. I love that film. I love the way it makes you think it's a Supernatural Thriller/Psychological Horror while it really is a touching Drama but you don't see it before the second viewing. I've heard somewhere that it wasn't until like the 18th or something draft of the screenplay that it was even decided that Bruce Willis' character would be... you know.

I can't help to think that Frank Marshall and Kathleen Kennedy, perhaps the most brilliant producer team of the past 25 years, had something to do with THE SIXTH SENSE's amazingness though.

I wish they'd have kept working with Night.

UNBREAKABLE... I understand why comic book geeks like it, and it deserves its spot in my DVD collection. Still, I've always felt like the problem with UNBREAKABLE is the same as the problem with every movie Night has made since SENSE; they're Gimmick Movies, and kinda pretentious.
But you all know this, you've seen them for yourselves, and the question on everybody's mind is: Is THE HAPPENING a change in this trend?

Well. It's not that bad. This is not THE VILLAGE. I haven't seen LADY IN THE WATER, it's the only one I haven't, but from what I've heard of it I don't think it's that either. It feels related to SIGNS in a lot of ways, and could be thought of as a companion piece. But I've always thought SIGNS failed where it tried to tell a story about a priest who lost faith but regained it through finding evidence of God's existance. That, if you think about it, really doesn't make any sense if the whole point of faith is to believe and not to know.

THE HAPPENING doesn't make that mistake. Like SIGNS, you can really get a sense of NIght's personal beliefs filter through the characters' dialogue and the theme of the story. In this case though it's more his idea about people instead of religion.

I can't say I always share his beliefs on a personal level but I respect the man for trying to say something with a story. The guy is a storyteller, no doubt. In THE HAPPENING, like with SIGNS, if you share his faith you'll probably like the story more and that's kind of the problem.

I don't mind films that explore a religious belief I don't share personally, but a story like that needs to invite the rest of the world. It could be a Han Solo character, a sceptic who says what the non-believers think, or it could be anything really to counterpoint the preaching. SIGNS didn't do that properly for me, but THE HAPPENING sort of did, I think.

So, in short, that's why I think it succeeds where SIGNS didn't.

*** SPOILER BELOW ***

There's a point towards the end where the news broadcaster interviews some scientest who explains to the public what's been going on, and he says he thinks the reason this only happens in the northeast is because it's just the first sign of something larger to come. The interviewer cuts him off and says, if it was happening globally he might feel inclined to believe him, but since it was only in the northeast of the US he thinks the government is behind it or something. Like he makes up excuses for himself to not have to believe the end is coming. Shuts his eyes to it, sort of.

There are a few scenes like that in the film that speaks directly to the viewer, and that feel like Night's commentary on the human race and how we think. They're not completely on the nose, and in a way they sort of make the story more interesting in a Rod Serling kind of way and that's cool. I like that.

There are also at least one scene that's really suspenseful, the one I'm thinking about is where the fruit cup lady goes bananas. That was cool.

There are also a lot of shortcomings, like it's not really graphic enough sometimes. You see a harvester roll over a guy and there's not a drop of blood. This is the same movie where a dude shoots himself in the forehead, drops to the ground, and after a few seconds there's a beautifully gross squirt from the hole in his head. Then a pause. Then one last squirt. That was nice. The harvester... should have been more graphic or shouldn't have been there at all maybe. But that's my opinion.

That's about it.

*** END SPOILER ***

To summarize: Night Shyamalan is a really good director. I know that. He should just do something other than what he's doing, that's all. Maybe he should direct someone else's screenplay. Maybe he should save his own stories and write them as novels instead, or let someone else shoot them. Maybe he should get Frank Marshall and Kathleen Kennedy to work with him again. Maybe he should re-write his screenplays 18 more times before shooting them and find that special thing to change and flip the story on its head. Maybe, they should let him make a miniseries or some Twin Peaks thing instead of feature films.

THE HAPPENING is an okay film, but as okay as it is, it still runs on the same gimmick as his other stuff, and after almost ten years I think it's safe to say that whatever it is he's trying to do - it's not working. Unless you feel "okay" is good enough.

Like I said in the beginning of this, I do have immense respect for M. Night Shyamalan as a filmmaker and I KNOW that he can do better than this.
He's just trying so damn hard to be really good that he forgets to be entertaining and interesting so his movies come off feeling kinda pretentious unfortunately. THE HAPPENING, as "Not That Bad" as it is, it's not that awesomely great either exactly. Go see THE MIST instead.

Well, that's about it. Oh yeah - and Wahlberg isn't as bad as is rumored all the time, but John Leguizamo is fucking brilliant all the way through. I don't think I've seen him pull off a performance that well before.

Until next time, this is TheNorthlander wondering if the plant monster thing from THE THING FROM ANOTHER PLANET is related to the Audrey plant.

It's nature so we'll never know...


And now one of TheNorthlander’s fellow countrymen with his take on the film:



Hi Harry and the AICN crew –

I just got home from watching Shyamalan's "The Happening" on its release here in Sweden, and I understand it comes out on Friday in the US and most other places. So, I thought I'd send you a review in case you want to run it. I went into this film thinking, based on the trailers, that whatever happens, however bad or good it is, at least it'll be interesting.

I'll cut to the chase:

I thought it was OK. The best thing about the film is the idea, and the worst thing is some of the execution. The best ranges from mediocre to awkward to beautiful to great. The film's opening 10 minutes are just like Harry described in his script review a while back. Brutal, fast, and nasty. A great opening. We are in the middle of what people think is a terrorist attack, and people are dying (killing themselves) everywhere. The most difficult part of the film for me were the next 20-30 minutes. The setting up of the characters is the weakest part of the whole film, and it doesn't do uneven actors like Mark Wahlberg and Zooey Deschanel any favors. That whole segment seemed very stilted, very controlled. What works in a quiet film like Unbreakable or Sixth Sense doesn't work here at all, because you can feel the words being scripted, the actors being moved around. Basically, I became aware of Shyamalan's hand forcing information upon me, and honestly I was hoping it would get better. And it does to some degree. There will be many that disagree, but I got accustomed to Wahlberg's odd characterization after a while, and both he and Deschanel became real characters halfway through the movie. Overall, though, this movie will get criticized for its acting, and it's unfortunate because I don't think it's the actors who are to blame here. John Leguizamo is the best of the bunch but that's not saying much.

So what worked? Well, as I mentioned, the opening, and James Newton-Howard's score is poetically fatalistic, but with that streak of romance. There are some really effective disturbing scenes, and my favorite part of the movie is in the last third of the film. It's probably the most out of place part of the story, but it gripped me. There was some nice and thoughtful symbolism, but in general, I wouldn't call it a scary or a frightening film. The biggest problem, from a popcorn-munching audience point of view, is that it's what I would call a 'message' film that constantly has its message posted on the screen. The personal story in "The Happening" isn't strong enough or engaging enough to begin with, so it takes a lot of effort to get invested in the movie (despite the 'shock' opening). The "what if this happened" part of the film worked well, but the story of Mark and Zooey, the glue that's supposed to bind the movie together and make the message seem
something inevitable, was awkward. It seemed rehearsed. But I do want to stress that there are some beautiful and some funny scenes, along with the disturbing ones and the occasional jump scare, and while they held my attention from the half hour mark until the end, they're not enough to make me feel like it's a movie that desperately needs to be seen again. Actually, thinking about it, it almost feels like a Paul Greengrass 'Bourne' or 'United 93' (more visceral) approach might have suited the script better. At least in the human story aspect.

I don't want to give away any spoilers, and I don't think I've mentioned anything that's not in the trailers (which, I was happy to see, have taken most of the memorable shots from the beginning of the film). I don't know how I've come across in my ramblings, but regardless, I came away from the movie satisfied, but far from wowed. We have high expectations when it comes to M. Night Shyamalan's movies (and he plays his part in hyping them up) but if this would have been his first film, I think we would be looking at it very differently. We might even think it's a great little art/independent sci-fi suspense film. And like I mentioned in the beginning, I thought it was interesting, and fairly entertaining. But seeing as how reviews are always intensely subjective, it's a film I'd recommend anyone to watch at some point, but don't go out of your way to see it now. Maybe catch a matinée. Something where you don't feel like you've wasted a ton of money,
because I do have a sneaking suspicion that this movie will have fewer defenders than 'Signs' and 'The Village'.

It's a far cry from perfect, and falls short of good. But I hope you enjoy it anyway. I did.

- H


I hate the disappointed tone in so many of these reviews. That’s such a drag. There’s nothing worse than reading the reaction of someone who really wanted to like a film, but just didn’t. That sort of heartbreak is becoming Shyamalan’s specialty, which is verrrry dangerous for a filmmaker.

Check this one:



Hi there,I don't know if you've received tons of these already, but if its of any use - feel free to publish this on your site.

So I saw The Happening recently. First, let me state I am a fan of M. Night's work. I thought Unbreakable was his best (and is one of my fave movies altogether), Sixth Sense was great, The Signs were very good and the Village and Lady in the water were flawed but interesting and enjoyable.Anyway, that is not important. Important is that The Happening is like it could've been made by anyone else but M. Night. If one was to disregard the mystery opening and the trailers, which are, granted, quite Shymalanian, the movie itself just... isn't. The inspired and innovative shots - are gone. Everything is directed by the book, like it could've been done by anyone.

Acting, which was perhaps never THE best aspect of Shymalan's movies but was always decent - here is truly awful. Very early on it gets evident acting is just way... something. Over the top, too weird, take a pick. That includes Mark Wahlberg who is, in reality, a decent actor. But here i seriously expected to see an explanation in the movie itself - why does everyone act so ...a bit off. That maybe bad acting is a part of the premise of the movie. But it is not.Maybe it's the dialogues, as there's a lot of cringe worthy lazy ass copouts and just lazy writing lines... A LOT of them. Much more than in other Shymalan's movies. As if he was writing it to get it over with. There's john Leguizamo's characther which is almost superfluous to the whole thing, they really could've went with a complete unknown for that role.

And then...there's the conceptual level of the screenplay. You know how in most movies there's the three act structure to the screenplay? The setup, the confrontation and the problem? Well, here it's more like we get the setup... and then the movie ends. That's it. Characters don't get involved in anything. They just go around...as stuff happens around them... they're unimportant, faceless, they're not part of even the smallest bit of the plot. And while that might be cool in some movies, here you don't get anything else but the already very weak plot. There's very, very little to hang onto here.On top of everything, production values are visibly lower this time around. While before Shymalan's movies could boast some nice images, expensive settings etc - the happening looks as if it was shot for a fraction of the budget Signs were made with. 90% of the movie we have people travelling on the road or in the fields... plus Wahlberg isn't what you might call an A list 20 million per play actor.

Anyway, there's very little to recommend here. I guess some of the most hardcore Shymalan's fans might be pleased but this time he went too far. I just didn't see any passion of his in this movie. Did someone put a gun to his head to make this?

Kind regards,
John Doe, Jr.


    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:18:14 AM CDT

    it's not happening apparently

    by mr_x

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:22:18 AM CDT

    Plants

    by redfist

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:27:00 AM CDT

    well i dont think i can say it better then

    by basehead

    mr_X. its not happening!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:32:02 AM CDT

    Return of the Giant Hogweed

    by bobjustbob

    The dance of the giant hogweed

    Mighty hogweed is avenged.
    Human bodies soon will know our anger.
    Kill them with your hogweed hairs
    Heracleum mantegazziani

    Giant hogweed lives

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:33:13 AM CDT

    WHAT'S HAPPENING!!!!!!!

    by redfist

    Not M. Night's career, someone stick a fork in this guy.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:33:22 AM CDT

    Damn!. Let's do this again

    by bobjustbob

    The dance of the giant hogweed

    Mighty hogweed is avenged.
    Human bodies soon will know our anger.
    Kill them with your hogweed hairs
    Heracleum mantegazziani

    Giant hogweed lives

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:48:10 AM CDT

    M. Night Smartipants' Waterloo

    by warphoenix

    To keep it brief, this movie can be liken to the gun you have pointed to your head JAM when you squeeze the trigger while the zombies as feasting on your legs. If you ever felt like taking a dump during a movie while you've managed to hold out for others (excluding BLADE 3), this one is it.

    M.Night... GARNGITFUCKED!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:52:37 AM CDT

    Can't trust reviews (especially M. Night ones)

    by evilgeek1

    I'm pretty much the only person I know who likes his movies. My friends make a point to remind me how shit they think he is. There's a lot of people (and it's their right) who hate his work, don't get him or just don't like his style. I dunno. I'm going to check it out for myself.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:52:51 AM CDT

    NEOPD

    by mrbong

    as in Not Even On Pirate Disc. just avoid this film. yes, it is THAT bad.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 5:00:54 AM CDT

    Can't be worse than Speed Racer

    by motoko kusanagi

  • Jun 12, 2008 5:26:18 AM CDT

    I See Dead Careers...

    by mr. p. lant

    They don't know they're dead!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 5:43:21 AM CDT

    I can't help but laugh

    by virtual satyr

    This movie will go down faster than a tower in New York.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 5:44:56 AM CDT

    Well...

    by forrestal_was_good

    I opted not to see "Lady in the Water" after the cinematic abortion that was "The Village." I was going to give Night another shot with "The Happening" but after reading these reviews I don't think I can bring myself to see it. I feel bad for the guy, to be honest.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:02:06 AM CDT

    LITW was fucking execrable

    by strabo

    Although I hate agreeing with someone with the handle "mrbong," I have to say he's absolutely correct. I'm not even willing to waste bandwidth downloading anything from this fucking hack.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:02:44 AM CDT

    It's sad when such a talented guy just wastes

    by lb

    ...his talent.
    I hope the movie is not as bad as I am hearing, but I do think he really has lost all his skill

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:15:47 AM CDT

    The Village and Lady...

    by tomdolan04

    commit the ultimate film sins. I didn't hate them. I didn't love them. They just truely bore and patronise the audience to death.

    Competant enough technically, but then again so was Mighty Ducks 3

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:19:03 AM CDT

    Only MNS Film I enjoyed was...

    by captain rawbeard

    ...Unbreakable. All his other films I found boring. But I do like the look of this one.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:21:45 AM CDT

    Jeffrey Wells is an idiot

    by bass ackwards

    Just throwing that out there.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:30:28 AM CDT

    The Village is a great little film

    by kwisatzhaderach

  • I honestly think the ending of this movie is highly, highly critical. And to me, resonating.

    Yes, the script was weak. Yes, his directing has plummeted to the depths of Sodom (Surprisingly it also looks like Tak Fujimoto, a man who was the strength of the 6th Sensem, seems to not care). Yes, Whalberg sounds like Arnie with an American accent. But the criticised subject matter of the "its the plants!" is not terrible. We all (maybe) believe in Global Warming, yet nature turning its back on us seems only believable if we are to blame.

    To me, this film says alot for the human race - We only care about the earth when it seems to not care about us.

    If only he had pulled it off...

    My major gripe with his directing is his poor, poor choice of what we see. The first shot of the film shows someone blatantly killing themselves. Suddenly all tension is removed from any scene after (even though he hides it in other various scenes). It made the film kitsch and broke the one rule of cinema tension - don't open the fucking door!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:39:07 AM CDT

    I like M. Night Shyamalan but Olivier Megaton

    by cuervojones

    Has now the coolest name.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:40:21 AM CDT

    Huh? Signs didn't prove God was real, it was still faith

    by drath

    Hence the reasons some people hate the movie--too many coincidences. If you have faith, it all makes sense. If you don't, it's luck, but there's so darned much that in a movie, where we know it's fake anyway, that many coincidences just seems like lazy writing.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:41:46 AM CDT

    M. Night Megaton

    by cuervojones

    That´s a great name. Anyway, Shyamalan can be a bad writer and a bad actor, but he is a damn good director.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:41:55 AM CDT

    TV advert

    by pearlanddean

    I saw this trailered on UK TV and unlike every trailer I've ever seen, this had the director himself telling us how great the film was. Is this guy obsessed with his own sense of deluded self-worth or what? Can someone please spoil this so I don't have to worry about seeing it? Plants make people commit suicide? Really?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:43:07 AM CDT

    Drath

    by cuervojones

    I dont have fatih but i still love that movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:44:48 AM CDT

    pearlanddean

    by cuervojones

    Ýou should watch Hitchcock´s trailers.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:54:28 AM CDT

    I hate Shymalan

    by series7

    Poo Poo on him.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:56:42 AM CDT

    The Happening 2 : Shit Happens

    by browzer

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:59:29 AM CDT

    CuervoJones

    by pearlanddean

    Touche, although I think Hitchcock had a better track record.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:59:49 AM CDT

    I rated this movie 1 out of 10 because

    by ingloriousjedi

    There is no suspense of fear in the whole movie because we are not dealing with zombies or any external threat that can create fear on screen. We only wait for the characters to STAND STILL..and then that means there gonna kill themselves. So I'm sure you'll all be in mega suspense of people ABOUT TO STAND STILL!! Anyone could see just from common sense that this concept could never form the structure of a horror/suspense.


    If Night was smart he would try and build the suspense from humans causing threat to other humans (as was done in War of The Worlds). He tried to do this with the old lady at the end, but failed so so hard. I hated this movie with a passion. *beep* M Night.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 7:01:24 AM CDT

    At least he's not in this one

    by ricardomontalban

    yes, i heard there's no m. night cameo in this film-- i guess miracles can happen... hey movie fans, check out this great new blog on blogspot. it's called thebitterproducer. spread the word!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 7:08:43 AM CDT

    "Mark Wahlberg who is, in reality, a decent actor"

    by jingle_balls

    Maybe in an alternate reality. I have seen nothing which is that impressive to suggest he is a decent actor. THat Oscar was a crock of shit, he swears a lot! Wow when is Samuel L gonna get his oscar nod?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 7:15:30 AM CDT

    I just saw the Signal last night

    by series7

    And it sounds like that is the movie The Happening wanted to be. I feel like after reading those reviews, Dr. Steve Brule and the cast (and Director) of the Happening come on screen and talk to the audience about global warming and what you can do to prevent it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 7:29:21 AM CDT

    The Village was garbage.

    by lost jarv

    and regarding "Form is temporary, Class is permanent"- How do we know that the 6th sense wasn't the form and his post unbreakable output is his true class?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 7:30:23 AM CDT

    Latauro

    by thunderbolt ross

    I like this guy's reviews

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 7:30:48 AM CDT

    M Night is a hack.

    by m bison

    He was a flash in the pan. He had a couple of good movies (probably because of the producers) and the rest of his work has been crap. When will you people wake up and realize he is a one-trick pony?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 7:31:25 AM CDT

    M Night vs Uwe Boll

    by wickedchicken37

    Boxing match. Two men enter, one man leaves. Both men should stop making movies.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 7:39:52 AM CDT

    Risking and Betting - a rant

    by beyondstatic

    All the arogance aside, M. Night Shyamalan may have "Risked His Career on a Fairy Tale" but he's certainly betting it on a Happening. I must say I'm intrigued by this one. He's a good writer... let me emphasize that again... he's a good WRITER... but his directing has always left a little to be desired. Clearly "The Sixth Sense" was phenominal. The stilted camera work and stoic acting worked again in "Unbreakable" but after a while the same crap needs to change. Mix it up. If he's a self-described Spielberg, perhaps he should take some lessons. "Jaws" is nothing like "Raiders" is nothing like "Schindler's List" is nothing like "Minority Report". (yes, there are similarities, but that's another rant altogether.) Night needs to mix things up, or, if he's stretched himself to the limit, focus on EITHER his writing or his directing. But he needs to improve on both fronts. The film business, as I understand it, moves pretty quickly. He needs some time to rework some drafts of his screenplays. He needs time to learn a different sense of camera to vary his style. He needs to improve his work with his actors and explore characters, breathe life into them and explore more deeply than the written word (which goes pretty deep to begin with), and take characters on a journey rather than just gradually revealing them. He is very good at what he does, but he needs a chance to improve. This may not be it. He, unfortunately, may not get another (unless this makes some money, which most of his stuff does). But if he adds the right weapons to his arsonal, he could someday soon be a force to be reckoned with... and even live up to his own hype.

    Robert McKee described a hack as someone who writes what sells rather than what's in your heart. What was in Night's heart, as I understand it, was "Lady in the Water". That worked as a story, (it really is a good, old-fashioned Grimm-style fairy tale) but would have been a bit better as a movie with a few more drafts. Now, it seems, he's back to writing what he hopes will sell... which is admirable to an extent, as he needs a comeback. But he needs a "Sixth Sense"-like comeback. Something that's from his heart. Something that he wants to see. Something a little more out of his head that we, the audience can sit back and watch without over-thinking. Mr. Shyamalan's not a hack, or hasn't been, but is risking becoming one staying with his heady-psychological-thriller-with-a-twist-ending-style. He's capable of so much more. Bet on yourself, Night. Learn, expand, and when you get back, pour your heart out and blow us away!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 7:40:34 AM CDT

    The first review was a plant!!

    by stupendous man

    u know its true

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 7:49:44 AM CDT

    what? is anyone actually SURPRISED??

    by maniaq

    three words:
    one
    trick
    pony

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 7:53:59 AM CDT

    I trust Latauro's reviews

    by drunken rage

    Not that I would have see this obvious piece of shit, regardless, but I feel vindicated.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 7:56:16 AM CDT

    redfist

    by betaraybill07

    You need to do it right my friend. PLANTS!!!!!!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 7:57:17 AM CDT

    He needs to make Wide Awake 2

    by series7

    Return of the Rosie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 8:05:13 AM CDT

    Damn You Michael Bay

    by mcmlxxvi

    Damn You Michael Bay

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 8:07:24 AM CDT

    MNS makes TV movies

    by reelheed

    Sixth Sense wasn't even that great but the only one I'd watch again. If there was nothing better on TV. Which there usually is. I saw Unbreakable, Signs and The Village at the cinema and borrowed a friends DVD of Lady. Each time I've come away a little less satisfied.

    The Happening seems to have had a really big marketing push over here in the UK but I just can't get excited over "yet another movie with a twist from the guy behind Sixth Sense".

    All MNS films feel the same. Devoid of passion. There isn't a moment in any of the films where I've held my breathe or felt my pulse quicken. Some of the characters have been emotive - I'm thinking of the 2 kids in SS and Unbreakable - but there has never been a tear or a cheer raised by any of the leads. I can't help but think that MNS wants to see himself in his deep stalwart heroes but knows that he is in fact much more like his simple and confused kids.

    I think I'll wait for The Happening to hit TV before I'll bother.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 8:13:20 AM CDT

    So the whole tomato scare

    by bobjustbob

    is just a publicity stunt for this movie?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 8:14:38 AM CDT

    Wahlberg is only decent when he plays morons

    by laserhead

    'Boogie Nights', 'Three Kings'... any time he attempts a character with an IQ over 100, it's cringe-worthy.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 8:18:23 AM CDT

    rated R

    by dollar bird

    I'm not going to see this movie because—like most people here—I know the twist and I really don't trust M. Night to pull it off with any amount of believability. But the thing I think is curious is the ads I keep seeing on teevee all proclaim this as his "first rated R movie". Now I know every talkback for every proposed movie has someone demanding the movie be a "hard R" because they want blood and tits in their Rainbow Brite re-imagining, but do most people really care what a film like this is going to be rated? I'm sure the film has earned the rating—it's no doubt got some gore (read the review above siting the spurting head wound) and the idea that everyone is killing themselves would be seen by the MPAA as too much for kids. (And it probably is.) But, really, that's how you're going to get us into the movie house? The best hook you've got is the rating?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 8:27:18 AM CDT

    Don't lob S. Racer in with M. Night

    by sans souci

    Speed Racer is actually the perfect summer movie. And at the very least you can say the Wachowskis tried to do something different. Shaymalan seems convinced that most people would be content watching paint dry on a humid day.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 8:31:24 AM CDT

    Watch Night's filmography in reverse order of release...

    by cloaker cobra

    ...and you'll see a remarkably talented filmmaker on the rise, as my friend also says about Tarantino.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 8:37:25 AM CDT

    M night really hates critics...

    by emeraldboy

    He utterly detests them in fact he despises them. He thinks they are weak. he thinks that they flip flop. One minute they hate his work. then one minute. they say seem to like it a little better. the more they see his films the more they like them. He thinks that critics are disengenous. There was interview with him and the man who wrote it said that beneath the sunny outlook is a granite exterior. Ie he is tough as hell.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 8:38:12 AM CDT

    some morning jamzz

    by g-ride9000

    Yeah
    Can you feel it baby
    I can too

    Come on swing it [4 times]

    1-2-3 - Now we come to the pay off

    It's such a good vibration
    It's such a sweet sensation [2 times]

    Yo! It's about that time
    To bring forth the rhythm and the rhyme
    I'm a get mine so get yours
    I wanna see sweat comin' out your pores
    On the house tip is how I'm swingin' this
    Strictly Hip-Hop boy, I ain't singin' this
    Bringing this to the entire nation
    Black, white, red, brown
    Feel the vibration

    Come on come on
    Feel it feel it
    Feel the vibration

    (Chorus)

    Vibrations good like Sunkist
    Many wanna know who done this
    Marky Mark and I'm here to move you
    Rhymes will groove you
    And I'm here to prove to you
    That we can party on the positiive side
    And pump posititve vibes
    So come along for the ride
    Making you feel the rhythm is my occupation
    So feel the vibration

    Come on come on
    Feel it feel it
    Feel the vibration

    (Chorus)

    Donnie D break it down

    Donnie D's on the back up
    Drug free, so put the crack up
    No need for speed
    I'm the anti D-R-U-G-G-I-E my
    Body is healthy
    My rhymes make me wealthy
    And the Funky Bunch helps me
    To bring you a show with no intoxication
    Come on feel the vibration

    Yeah
    Can you feel it baby
    I can too

    (Chorus)

    Now the time has come for you to get up
    The rest had you fed up but Yo, I won't let up
    On the rhythm and rhyme that's designed to
    Make your behind move to what I'm inclinced to
    Pure Hip Hop, no sell out
    If you ain't in it to win it
    Then get the hell out
    I command you to dance
    I wanna see motivation
    Come on now feel the vibration

    {Piano solo}

    It's such a good vibration
    Come on come on come on
    It's such a sweet sensation
    Feel it feel it

    (Chorus)

    {Piano - out}

    It's such a good vibration
    Come on come on come on
    It's such a sweet sensation
    Feel it feel it

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 8:40:00 AM CDT

    THIS MOVIE SHOULD BE CALLED

    by g-ride9000

    WHAT HAPPENS WHEN PLANTS FART

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 8:40:51 AM CDT

    Wahlberg Oscar nod was a joke

    by redhhades

    Things like that makes those awards less and less important every single year, proving that it just needs some studio hype to someone to get one. I can't believe no other actor had better supporting work than Wahlberg that year. To get and award nod because you play a loud and full mouthed guy who has nothing more to say is ridiculous. BTW, The Happening looks like a X-Files episode.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 8:42:53 AM CDT

    Signs is much better than Unbreakable

    by sithdan

    Unbreakable is a narcolepsy inducer. It took me four sittings to get through the entire thing. Signs, however, kept me revited throughout. Tremendous movie. I couldn't stand The Village and Lady in the Water. The Happening looks promising.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:02:23 AM CDT

    You better eat your salad

    by bobjustbob

    before your salad eats you!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Um..not really. Faith can be affirmed with evidence from nature, etc.

    I loved all of his films, except lady in the water which I will not see, and that goes for the happening too. I guess that makes me a Shamaylan apologist? Anyway I can't wait to see the happening on rifftrax in a year or two!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:03:22 AM CDT

    UNBREAKABLE is incredible

    by the_scream

    Great acting. Good, slow build. It was the perfect superhero film at a time when there was no decent superhero movies. The only thing that sucks was the stupid "where are they now" summary at the end. That was lame and surely must have been forced onto MNS?

    I'm sick of everyone talking about the Sixth Sense. Every review or talkbacker comment is so predictable. "He has been making progressively worse films since the Sixth Sense"...SHUT UP! Everyone has heard it a thousand times and it is simply not true. SS, Unbreakable and Signs were good movies that people enjoyed in the cinema. These three films received positive reviews, all over 60% at RottenTomatoes.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:10:18 AM CDT

    Rated "R" for radish

    by bobjustbob

    And SIGNS was belly-laughing horrible. All it needed was gophers and Monkey Boy.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:12:53 AM CDT

    We are an ADVANCED ALIEN RACE

    by bobjustbob

    But we communicate with each other via molested corn fields and baby monitors.And we are exhibitionists.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:13:54 AM CDT

    Watching M. Night's Movies in Reverse

    by kevinwillis.net

    I would not have seen "Lady in the Water" and thought I had just seen the work of a film maker with a lot of potential. I would have thought I had just seen a pretentious film school student given a budget way beyond his abilities. That's a flippin' horrible movie, in almost every way--not to mention the only interesting character was the "bad" guy--ergo, the critic. Everybody else was bad or meh, and M. Night's cameo was cringe-inducing, every moment he was on screen. I took the Village with a grain of salt and, with effort, managed to enjoy it. But Lady in the Water? I'd almost rather sit and watch some Uwe Boll. At least there's likely to be some boobs.Seriously, this looks terrible. I will probably catch in on DVD, via Netflix, just to see how horrible it actually is. M. Night is capable of some incredible work, and had the potential to be the next Spielberg or Hitchcock--and if he could just get over his own narcissism and solipsism (egotism doesn't begin to describe the M. Night universe of Me Me Me and Myself!), he could make some great films.
    I just don't think he's going to do it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:14:01 AM CDT

    And we loved Mexico CIty

    by bobjustbob

    Just don't drink the water!!!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:16:23 AM CDT

    The Only Happening ...

    by prof. pretorious

    Is Shylammydingdong sucking his own dick... AGAIN ...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:16:35 AM CDT

    M. Night *is* in the movie...

    by carmillavondoom

    ...just off-screen. He 'cast' himself as the character texting his girlfriend throughout. Heh.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:17:54 AM CDT

    He had one good script ...

    by prof. pretorious

    and now he's rich and famous, ain't Amerika great ???

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:18:35 AM CDT

    Sithdan, as he said, Signs is belly-laughing horrible

    by g-ride9000

    I guessed that movie's ending during the trailer.. THE FUCKING TRAILER!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:19:32 AM CDT

    PLANT!

    by g-ride9000

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:19:43 AM CDT

    If the plants don't bust out LOTR / whomping willow

    by creasybear

    style for the big climactic showdown between flora and fauna, then I'm not interested. From all those reviews, I never sensed a true conclusion to this movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:20:44 AM CDT

    It's The Weeds !!!

    by prof. pretorious

    QUICK, hand that Roundup!! How pathetic, how sad... The plants are killing us, ~sigh~

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:21:17 AM CDT

    I Loved Unbreakable . . .

    by kevinwillis.net

    Signs was the first movie to show what was going to start going wrong with M. Night's movies. Aliens coming to our planet to kidnap people (with a natural anesthetic gas they emit from their wrists) . . . they are coming to a planet (via interstellar travel) that is 3/4ths water . . . and water kills them . . . and they wander around naked. And the aliens looks comical. It was silly, and needed work--but M. Night had become too good to take input on such foolishness, or give the script another pass with some question marks addressed.
    He also cast himself in a critical roll that required better acting than he had to give it. I looked past it, because of 6th Sense and Unbreakable, but those things--especially the anemic aliens, being naked and yet killed by water--I mean, just a rev that gave them environmental suits that could be flustered by water would have been an improvement, and someone saying: "Hey, maybe someone else should play this role. There's a smaller cameo somewhere for you." Again, I liked The Village through sheer force of will and then despite my effort, M. Night spat on that goodwill with Lady In the Water (previous title: I Am a God and Everyone Else is Stupid. Worship Me, Filthy Swine!) . . . sigh. After first seeing The Sixth Sense, I had such high hopes. This guy is going to be one of the greats, I thought to myself. If this is where he's starting out, how much better is he going to get? I wondered.
    Apparently, he wasn't going to get any better at all. In fact, he was going to go the other direction.
    Sigh.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:24:34 AM CDT

    Downward and downward ...

    by prof. pretorious

    he spirals... How low can he go ?? When will the money stop for his lameass scripts???

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:24:38 AM CDT

    Node32774!

    by kevinwillis.net

    You actually are M. Night Shamyalan! I should have known.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:26:10 AM CDT

    I'm 12 years old ....

    by prof. pretorious

    and I liiiiiiikkkke him !! Yuch, get a clue !! He had maybe two good script ideas, and the rest have suckkeddd !!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:28:26 AM CDT

    Too bad, so sad...

    by prof. pretorious

    maybe he can just keep kissing his mirror all the time, telling himself what a genius he is ....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:29:17 AM CDT

    I Guessed This Movie's Ending

    by kevinwillis.net

    When I heard it was called The Green Effect. Before the more pretentious "The Happening".The next M. Night Movie: "The Awesome Importanting". Then "The Annoying Self-Important Title". He'll be getting very meta by then.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:30:40 AM CDT

    M. Night Has Had a Full Sized M. Night Replica

    by kevinwillis.net

    manufactured. With fully articulated mouth, and other naughty bits, so he can french-kiss himself and "make love to the most brilliant, important human being on the planet", in his words. True story.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:32:36 AM CDT

    The Aliens never heard of Darwin

    by bobjustbob

    And Shyamalan never heard of Intelligent Design. (At least as applied to story telling."Wow! We just happen to have this book about UFOs written by some crazy Art Bell-wannabe. And everything in it is right! How convient!!!!"

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:32:58 AM CDT

    I'm soooo great, I'm soooo great ....

    by prof. pretorious

    He just stands in front of his mirror allllll daaaayyy loooonggg ....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:35:03 AM CDT

    His next movie: THE NIGHT OF THE NIGHT IN THE NIGHT

    by bobjustbob

    Starring, written, produced, directed and catered by M NIGHT!fap fap fap fap FAP!!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:35:59 AM CDT

    Eeeuuugghhhh !!!!

    by prof. pretorious

    Shlammydingdong making out with a real doll Shlammy !!!
    (RETCH !!!)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:37:02 AM CDT

    Sixth Sense was good, Unbreakable pretty good...

    by the grug

    Signs was rubbish, but I really liked the Village (I still don't understand the hate that film cops). It'll be interesting to see how this pans out.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:37:42 AM CDT

    Wonder how many millions will ...

    by prof. pretorious

    disappear down the drain with this pathetic slop ????

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:40:02 AM CDT

    The Emperor has no clothes

    by bobjustbob

    And he doesn't get my $10 either...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:40:43 AM CDT

    Wait, does it have talking trees???

    by prof. pretorious

    THAT would be different .... NOT !!!
    Scary weeds, scary grass, ahhhhh !!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:43:33 AM CDT

    Science!

    by redundant23

    >>"We know this because he keeps saying "science" and "scientific" a lot, words that are said a lot in films by characters who don't sound anything like scientists." So true. Just like with subjects: any subject with the word "science" in it isn't really a science (computer science, political science, etc.)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:46:06 AM CDT

    I had a spicy salad last night

    by bobjustbob

    And it's talking to me right now.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:46:12 AM CDT

    Lazy hack !!

    by prof. pretorious

    He has the character keep repeating the word !!!
    WHAT A HACK !!
    Somebody Please Stop Him !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:48:31 AM CDT

    WAIT !! WHAT'S THAT ??

    by prof. pretorious

    outside my window ???
    IT'S A TREEEEEEE !!!

    AHHHHHHHHHHH !! (I'm soooo scared)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:49:05 AM CDT

    So it's agreed, then...

    by kid z

    ...We band together and hound MNS right out of the business! Get up geeks... we have work to do!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:52:32 AM CDT

    It's GRASS !!!!

    by prof. pretorious

    AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH !!!
    The grass is killing us !!!!!!!!!!
    Could this be the worst idea for a horror movie yet ?????

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:54:09 AM CDT

    Sound GREAT !!

    by prof. pretorious

    Let's ride his sorry ass out of town, for EVER !!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:54:29 AM CDT

    M Night likes to nail other people's wife.

    by bobjustbob

    He nails SugarTits to the tree in SIGNS. He nails ScienceBoy's wife via cellphone in THE FAPPENNING. And he likes to play doctor.Discuss.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:54:35 AM CDT

    Liked it a lot

    by holgi65

    I guess Night wants to do his films like he does. In that sense he is a European Auteur, and I bless him for that.
    Somewhere during the film I had a feeling like with the french classic "Choses de la vie" - which most talkbackers would never watch or like - and it actualy ends in Paris' royal gardens, of all places. Sure, the acting is stilted, the characters are a few degrees off from the usual boring Bay-Awesome, no big stars to like (?) and especialy Leguizamo is creepy. But thats why he is there. Night wants to set off people, with strange deaths all around you and a disfunctional family.
    I mostly agree with Mr. H's review, but would rate it higher.
    I found it surprisingly scary, and I could discuss many points that are weak, but then there is the hotdog guy, the soldier with the Hummer and the Lady from the rural farmhouse... B.t.w. is that Three-Mile-Island in the background?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:57:41 AM CDT

    How awesome would it have been...

    by christopher3

    If Shyamalan had directed Scott Smith's "The Ruins" rather than this? I'm thinking that might have been a pretty cool matchup.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:58:16 AM CDT

    Hey !! All you actors !!

    by prof. pretorious

    Just ... talk... like... William ...Shatner
    NOW THAT'S SCARY !!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 10:03:40 AM CDT

    I don't know about the rest of you ...

    by prof. pretorious

    but I just can't stop kicking this guy when he's down !!!
    (Like picking on a retard)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 10:05:22 AM CDT

    I Heard it Throught the Grapevine

    by bobjustbob

    Run Like Hell!!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 10:10:25 AM CDT

    Maybe he should have the grass

    by prof. pretorious

    talk. THAT would be different. LOTR spoiled the talking tree thing. BUT talking grass, that would be scaaaaarrrryyyy !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 10:15:40 AM CDT

    The Question Is ...

    by prof. pretorious

    how bad does one of his movies have to suck until everybody quits showing up???

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 10:22:42 AM CDT

    It is pretty cool ...

    by prof. pretorious

    how lame-ass he has gotten. People were saying he was great when Signs came out. Now they realize that movie actually sucked rocks.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 10:27:35 AM CDT

    How much of this will people ...

    by prof. pretorious

    actually put up with ??? How friggin' bad does one of his movies have to be, before the morons stop showing up at the boxoffice??

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 10:28:21 AM CDT

    AHHHH!!! a flower

    by g-ride9000

    AHHHHHHH!!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 10:30:51 AM CDT

    I thimk literally when...

    by g-ride9000

    M. Night's films will stop when they stop making money at all....see the problem is, he doesn't spend very much cause everyone is just standing around outside. When your antagonist is some plants, that don't move. You save the studio money. They like that.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 10:31:12 AM CDT

    About the WAR OF THE WORLDS comparison:

    by derlanghaarige

    "The "scares" are more comical than frightening, the characters are, without exception, unlikable".
    Dude, if you were talking about Spielbergs WOTW, that's exactly what happened there too!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 10:31:31 AM CDT

    i meant thiNk

    by g-ride9000

  • Jun 12, 2008 10:33:47 AM CDT

    Flowers talking ...

    by prof. pretorious

    ahhhhhhhhh !!! The flowers are trying to kill me !!!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 10:47:01 AM CDT

    Ahh well he's made his many millions...time to move on

    by bong

    I wish I could retire like that at such an early age :(

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 10:47:09 AM CDT

    I'm eating a carrot

    by bobjustbob

    TAKE THAT!!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 10:54:35 AM CDT

    The weeds, the weeds !!!

    by prof. pretorious

    It's the weeds giving off poison gassssss, ahhhhhhh !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 10:56:39 AM CDT

    On the other hand ...

    by prof. pretorious

    Al Gore will probably pay people to go see this piece of crap !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 11:08:47 AM CDT

    Is it because I forgot to water the

    by prof. pretorious

    Begonias? Is that it? Is that why the plants have it in for us? And what about rose bushes? Are they giving off toxic perfume???

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 11:10:23 AM CDT

    Did Hitchcock debate this idea?

    by prof. pretorious

    Should we use birds, or trees?? Hmmmm, trees are pretty scary. "The Trees" That's got a nice ring to it. Hmmmmmm ...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 11:11:22 AM CDT

    wasn't The Ruins

    by gatsbys west egg omlet

    "It's the plants!" too? i didn't see it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 11:15:37 AM CDT

    23% on Rotten Tomatoes...

    by pennsy

    Just one site, yes, but still barely above the Mendoza Line.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 11:20:48 AM CDT

    The Variety review said

    by prof. pretorious

    it sucked rocks through a flavor straw.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 11:22:51 AM CDT

    This guy is one of the rare times...

    by hexus

    When people at the studio should have more power to reign in the director. He's the perfect example of when total creative control is actually a mistake.

    I hate saying it because 99.9% of the time I have the opposite opinion.

    Shamalama needs to be slapped down, and the studio should get a final cut on his movies.

    :-(

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 11:29:44 AM CDT

    And we are surprised by what exactly?

    by jimbubble

    That this guy has only ever made one decent film,and it wasn`t the Sixth fxckin Sense?
    Go back and watch that film again and tell me it`s not the most over-rated pile of dog links youv`e ever seen?
    I see an over hyped directors career dead in the pan!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 11:30:29 AM CDT

    "Just when you thought is was safe..."

    by bobjustbob

    "to go to the salad bar."

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 11:31:02 AM CDT

    Let's hope and pray !!

    by prof. pretorious

    that this pile of shit is the final nail in the coffin of his so-called career !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 11:32:54 AM CDT

    the mist

    by long live the new chris

    marcia gay harden and the last five minutes (poor execution and the music from gladiator) pretty much ruined that movie for me.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 11:35:19 AM CDT

    I figured it out.

    by hexus

    We get the assholes who keep fucking over Ridley Scott, and get them with Shamalama.

    Probably end up with a well balanced film that way.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 11:36:56 AM CDT

    It's Attack of the Killer Tomatoes

    by prof. pretorious

    all over again, but not so funny this time ...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 11:46:45 AM CDT

    If only he could buy the rights from Mel...

    by jackpumpkinhead

    ...then "The Passion II" would be the perfect vehicle for him. Of course, it would be about Shyamalan rather than Jesus, but it already is so in his mind, so that wouldn't be a problem. He could play himself, since he has proven his excellent acting skills many times.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 11:48:28 AM CDT

    JackPumpkinhead

    by hexus

    He already did the savior of mankind story with himself in the lead role.

    Not that repeating himself is beyond possibility. ;-)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 11:50:04 AM CDT

    Loved his first 3 movies, thought they were pretty much awesome.

    by novaman5000

    Sixth Sense is a classic for a reason. Unbreakable was slow, but still engaging, and Signs I just found to be immensely satisfying and a great twist on the alien invasion genre by keeping it personal.
    The village was where things started to go downhill. I think part of the problem was that he lost the supernatural edge. The movie pretended to have one for a while, but it played it's hand way to earn and showed that the monsters were fake, which totally ruined the suspense of the rest of the flick. There were some solid sequences, though. The film overall had some great production values, but it couldn't save an overall weak story and the twist I guessed in the first 20 minutes.
    Lady and the Water had the same production values but for a story about magic, there was NONE in it. It was boring, heavyhanded and obvious. Again, flashes of greatness can not save it.
    I wanted Happening to be a return to form, but everything points to that not being the case.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 11:52:26 AM CDT

    I loved NONE of his movies ...

    by prof. pretorious

    and I knew I wouldn't love this one either ....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 11:52:56 AM CDT

    it's M. Night Shyamalan's Happening...

    by thebaxter

    and it's freaking me out!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 11:55:00 AM CDT

    Am I the only one who liked Lady in the Water?

    by aceattorney

    I didn't think it was as good as his other films (tho the Village stank), but I did enjoy it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 11:55:11 AM CDT

    It's a Non-Happening ....

    by prof. pretorious

    nothing scary happens, nothing interesting, nothing worthwh watching ...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 11:56:17 AM CDT

    You can track his descent via rottentomatoes.com

    by novaman5000

    Critics liked his first 3 (sixth sense highest rated, followed by signs, followed by unbreakable)... Things just went downhill from there. The happening is his worst rated film at 17%. A shame. What are you doing to yourself, M. Night??

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 11:58:09 AM CDT

    The lady in the water is a strange case.

    by novaman5000

    I have friends who are usually so critical of films who totally dug that movie, while i just could not get into it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 11:58:34 AM CDT

    17% on Rotten Tomatoes

    by bobjustbob

    And I think that's ironic. Spoiled vegetables should love it! (I know, tomatoes are technically fruit.)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 12:08:32 PM CDT

    Lady in the Toliet ??

    by prof. pretorious

    only a true maschocist could sit through that shit. Ohhhh, hurt me some more Shlammy !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 12:13:34 PM CDT

    Prof, does making fun of M. Night give you a boner?

    by novaman5000

    The amount of pleasure you're taking from his failure is almost criminal! Keep it in your pants!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 12:19:20 PM CDT

    I Love Bashing Shlammy !!!

    by prof. pretorious

    He's so full of himself, such a pretentious IDIOT !!! Who could resist?? look at all the Talkbackers who think he SUCKS !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 12:23:02 PM CDT

    Let's ALL BASH Schlammy !!!

    by prof. pretorious

    That self absorbed, delusional monologue, "you people should kiss my brown ass for making such wonderful movies" Ahahhhahahhhah !! He's gone off the deep end !!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 12:25:03 PM CDT

    haha "a lot of talkbackers think he sucks"

    by novaman5000

    wouldn't really hold up in a court of law. Being a jackass is kind of a pre-requisite to being a talkbacker... Hell hath no minor fury like a bored geek at work.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 12:28:52 PM CDT

    Hey !!! I haven't done my

    by prof. pretorious

    Shlammydingdong soundalikes yet !! Shalamidingmydong, Sammysuckadingdong, Swammysuckdong ...
    What a pretentious retard !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 12:29:09 PM CDT

    Sigh...

    by flickapoo

  • Jun 12, 2008 12:29:14 PM CDT

    A plot so simple...

    by bobjustbob

    ... even a caveman could understand it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 12:31:21 PM CDT

    Yeah and about the reviewer who said if you have faith

    by novaman5000

    you will like signs. I'm not religious AT ALL and I still liked it. I think it's a bit shallow to think that if you disagree with a films message, you can't appreciate it as a film. Life and Movies are not the same thing. It's not hard to separate that for most of us.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 12:32:23 PM CDT

    Why Is This Guy Still Working

    by saltoner

    It fascinates me that so many people keep saying "I think MNS has a lot of talent, but..." NO he doesn't! "The Sixth Sense" was a fluke of a film. He so very luckily got all things right and hit big, but he will never capture that magic again. MNS is a hack writer and director with no talent and should be forced out of film and into local commercials. I can go on and on but we all get the point.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 12:33:05 PM CDT

    Signs???

    by prof. pretorious

    It's a SIGN you might be retarded if you thought that was a good flick ....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 12:38:18 PM CDT

    Someone earlier actually had the balls

    by skimn

    to bring up Hitchcock's trailers, in comparison with M Night's?? Hitchcock's were witty and Hitch's dry delivery almost undersold the movie. Hitchcock deserved the title Master Of Suspense. M Night is more and more looking like the Master Of Meh.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 12:46:20 PM CDT

    Master of Meh !!

    by prof. pretorious

    That sums it up, dude !!!
    Hitchcock was a true genius !!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 12:52:17 PM CDT

    whatever prof.

    by novaman5000

    It's 74% on RT. I'm not the only one who liked the film.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 12:52:45 PM CDT

    How about walking Venus Flytraps ??

    by prof. pretorious

    That grab you and eat you? That would be cool ...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 12:53:16 PM CDT

    What would you rather have?

    by chiahead

    an M Night Shyamalan movie with a decent and unique premise that is piss poorly executed and condescending or a Uwe Boll movie that takes a pre-existing IP that is beloved and completely farks it up? I'm not being argumentative, I'm taking a poll. I feel like with Boll I have no expectations except for it to suck, so sitting through one of his monstrosities might not be as bad. With MNS I want it to do well so when it inevitably doesn't, I get upset, pissed off, sad, then pissed off again and then I start asking useless poll questions.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 12:55:46 PM CDT

    I'd rather have ...

    by prof. pretorious

    flaming red hot pokers jammed into my eye sockets ....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 1:08:03 PM CDT

    chiahead Poll

    by saltoner

    I'd rather go see a Brett Ratner film.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 1:09:04 PM CDT

    Boll and Shyamalan

    by bobjustbob

    as 2 sides of the same coin. Both are far less talented than they believe they are. And they both have their apologists. Same goes with Bay.And I'm going to mention gophers and Monkey Boy for completeness.Tom Cruise, Tom Cruise, Tom Cruise.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 1:10:26 PM CDT

    OH NO!

    by saltoner

    I should have bit my tongue, now all these delusional fans of Ratner are going to come of the woodwork. Just kidding guys, can't for "The Incredible Shrinking Man"!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 1:14:18 PM CDT

    Bobjustbob

    by novaman5000

    Have you ever seen a Uwe Boll apologist? Ever? I think you're making it up. Say what you want about M. Night, but to put him on the same level as Boll requires logic twisting of such epic proportions that I'm surprised you didn't hurt yourself

    Reply to Talkback

  • apparently it can.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 1:23:41 PM CDT

    Boll apologists

    by bobjustbob

    Yes, I have met Boll apologists. "It's just a fun movie. Yes it dumb but I enjoyed it." Just like a Bay apologist. And although they may defer in degree I stand by my assertion they don't differ in kind. Neither one is as talented as think think they are. No problem with logic there.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 1:24:17 PM CDT

    If i hear one more comment about the water in "Signs"

    by darthvedder81

    I'm going to kill someone. "Signs" wasn't about an alien invasion you morons. Over analyzing movies like this is really retarded. "Signs" was the story of a family in crisis both internally and externally (but more the former). It's also creepy, tense, funny, thrilling well-acted and is M. Night's best movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 1:25:55 PM CDT

    Signs (that you're a retard)

    by prof. pretorious

    If you find yourself compelled to apologize for any of Shlammydingdong's movies, you're retarded !!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 1:26:14 PM CDT

    M Night and SIGNS

    by bobjustbob

    IMO, SIGNS is the epitome of what’s wrong with M Night’s “storytelling.” Shyamalan’s shtick is to devise a gimmick to wrap a story around. There’s nothing wrong with that if it’s done well. It’s what he does. It’s all he does.

    SIGNS fails because both the gimmick and the story around the gimmick fail. The gimmick is groan-inducingly silly and the story is lazy and contrived. I can hear God saying “Sorry ‘bout the wife, but I was really afraid I was going to lose you to Satan. Just remember that my son Jesus was nailed to a tree too and look how well he’s done. Plus your brother really wanted to use that bat again. SWING AWAY!!!!!”YMMV

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 1:28:39 PM CDT

    Signs (that a movie sucks)

    by prof. pretorious

    1. The premise is stupid
    2. The dialogue is groan inducing.
    3. The director has a cameo part.
    4. The creatures look retarded

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 1:31:11 PM CDT

    The Crapening or the Un-happening?

    by yeti

  • Jun 12, 2008 1:32:40 PM CDT

    The correct titles ...

    by prof. pretorious

    The Sucks Sense. Unwatchable. The Village Idiots. Signs (that this movie sucks). The lady in the Toliet. The Un-Happening.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 1:32:50 PM CDT

    It's finally HAPPENING!

    by luscious.868

    With this latest cinematic abortion M. Egotistical Shamalamadingdon's descent into direct to DVD quality cinema will be complete.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 1:33:13 PM CDT

    "I hate the disappointed tone of these reviews"

    by trazadone

    I don't understand, Moriarty, why does the disappointed tone surprise you? The guy has made exactly one watchable film many years ago. It's like expresseing surprise that the latest Uwe Boll film was not well regarded. MNS is at the very least narcissistic and his inability to see that his ideas just aren't that great is laughable. Anyway, doesn't this just rip off Stephen King's The Cell?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 1:33:28 PM CDT

    The Village

    by scrivener

    I still think The Village is M. Night's only good movie. Unbreakable had potential, but was horribly wasted... and I may be the only person on earth who hated The Sixth Sense (I had it figured out in the first 5 minutes). Signs was just bad storytelling and Lady in the Water was an exercise in cinematic masturbation. I think I'll just wait for the Blu-Ray and Netflix it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 1:34:54 PM CDT

    CORRECTION !!!!

    by prof. pretorious

    That should have been "The Crapening". Thank You, whoever you are ...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 1:36:51 PM CDT

    UNBREAKABLE

    by bobjustbob

    I liked UNBREAKABLE but it felt like it had an ACT I followed by extended ACTS IIa and IIb. I assume this is because UNBREAKABLE was inteneded to be the opening chapter of a larger story.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 1:37:11 PM CDT

    The Village Idiots ????

    by prof. pretorious

    This color is wrong, this color is not permitted, this color blahdey bladehy Freakin' BLAH !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 1:37:38 PM CDT

    I prefer the FAPPENING

    by bobjustbob

    fap fap fap FFAAAAPPPP!!!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 1:40:28 PM CDT

    darthvedder81

    by series7

    Ok, for all of us that don't have the need to analysis the deeper meaning of bad films, Signs is about a Alien Invasion, or its about M. Knight Salame’s attempt to drag a half hour twilight zone episode into a 2 hour movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 1:43:17 PM CDT

    Signs ?????

    by prof. pretorious

    Signs that you wasted $10 on a freakin' lameass Movie !!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 1:50:31 PM CDT

    FLUKE

    by filmfunk

    1 Big twisty smash hit and he can't possibly keep it up! I understand why he thinks the sun shines outa his own A'hole! he did the biggest boxoffice in the world EVER! and has managed to garner a huge following but aint it about time The loyalty stopped and the Insane Fans and M (what's it stand for?) Night himself admit his later effort are utter dogshit!I will see this though for comedy value.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 1:55:42 PM CDT

    M stands for

    by prof. pretorious

    Muh Genius, which is un-limited by mortals ...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 1:56:04 PM CDT

    DerLanghaarige: Good Call of WOW

    by kevinwillis.net

    War of the World's was tedious. And every character in that movie was unlikable. Every one. It apparently succeeded on one level: I had a nightmare about tripods destroying the world. Which is unusual for me, to have a movie effect me enough that I have a dream about it. But I found the movie itself tedious and the characters unlikable and the scares more or less "meh". But I liked the sets and the cinematagrophy, so I guess that's what got to me.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 1:56:33 PM CDT

    To the jerkoff saying Signs isn't about an alien invasion

    by hawaiian organ donor

    That's like saying the Iraq War wasn't about oil.Of course it's about an invasion. Just because laser beams aren't shown obliterating the White House doesn't mean it's not a full on invasion.M. Twilight goes to great lengths to tell us about lights above every big city on the planet.Just like that Darabont script for Indy, the more I think about Signs, the angrier I get.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 1:57:01 PM CDT

    Every one of his films are extended Twilight Zone episodes

    by trazadone

    Expensive Twilight Zone episodes, but Twilight Zone episodes just the same. His films have more padding than a skinny man in a Santa suit.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 1:57:11 PM CDT

    I prefer: The Trappecino!

    by kevinwillis.net

    M. Night directs the Simpson's Movie. Now, that would be a match up. Ugh.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 1:57:26 PM CDT

    I stand corrected: UWE BOLL

    by bobjustbob

    I just looked at Uwe Boll's filmography and I don't know anyone who likes any of that shit. My apologies. (For some reason I thought he did the first AvP.)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 1:58:55 PM CDT

    I've Watched a Few Classic Twilight Zone Episodes

    by kevinwillis.net

    . . . recently. Light on the effects, often stilted dialog, often slow moving. But even these made-for-TV vignettes from the 60s are more interesting and better made than Lady in the Water. I'd watch a season or two of Twilight Zones before heading back to that self-absorbed piece of M. Night masturbation.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:02:45 PM CDT

    Shyamalan say's he's the new Spielberg

    by bobjustbob

    Unfortunately he's the new NEW Speilberg and not the old Speilberg. I miss the old Speilberg.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:04:47 PM CDT

    I Respect Uwe Boll for Making Pretty Big Films

    by kevinwillis.net

    With no talent. It's amazing he can get this stuff off the ground, into theaters and onto DVD. And he did it without making some pretty good movies first--he's always made crappy movies. Although, in fairness, his crappy movies aren't thinly veiled paeans to the greatness of Uwe Boll.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:06:09 PM CDT

    M. Night Could have Been the New Spielberg

    by kevinwillis.net

    He had that potential. But, he's blown it. Completely. And unless he finally gets humbled and has to spend a decade in the wilderness, I don't think he's going to get it back.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:07:09 PM CDT

    Shlammy's off his rocker ..

    by prof. pretorious

    first he's the new Hitchcock, now he's the new Spielberg, who will he be tomorrow ???

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:08:32 PM CDT

    He's had ZERO good movies ...

    by prof. pretorious

    not a single one was even close to being 'good'. They all SUCK !!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:10:04 PM CDT

    Maybe, just maybe ...

    by prof. pretorious

    this one will tank soooo deeply that no one will give him money for another piece of crap !!! Maybe this one is the ONE !!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:10:32 PM CDT

    Same Mistake as in Reign of Fire

    by zinc_chameleon

    M. Night could have made this a thriller, if he had worked out with a molecular biologist or a virologist how a plant could evolve such a defense, and how that defense could jump species. They almost had it in 'Reign of Fire'. It wouldn't be dragons that killed us, it would be their retroviruses.
    But M. Night just isn't that deep a thinker.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:12:21 PM CDT

    Shlammy sat thinking ...

    by prof. pretorious

    Birds was good, yes, nature turns on mankind, yes yes, nature, hmmmm. I've got IT !! Yes, plants turn on mankind !! I AM Genius !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:13:30 PM CDT

    Talk about THIS movie in your reviews, please.

    by thebearovingian

    No one gives a shit about your repetitive, stupid fuckin' opinions about The Sixth Sense, Unbreakable, Signs, The Village or Lady in The Water! Be here now. Do not emulate or imitate Harry, et al. Just review The Happening, OK?!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:14:03 PM CDT

    The Clips Of The Happening As Shown On Letterman, Were Horrible!

    by media messiah

    The acting was inexcusably bad...from Mark Wahlberg to his female co-star. I have to blame this on the actors yes, but the director also has to take blame as it is his job to make sure that he cast actors who can authentically deliver his lines and good performances, therein...or correct them, either the scripted dialogue or the actors when they don't bring forth the intended mood. Wahlberg's performance was embarrassing to say the least...and I don't like attacking people anymore really, but I'm telling the truth.

    An actor depends on his director to spot their flaws and mistakes and to step in to correct them...either M. Night can't direct actors if they are not fully developed, or he is afraid to direct a star, hence he is allowing them to go without any real direction. You can get away with that when dealing with a truly great actor, if not however, you are taking a big risk...and in this case, Wahlberg's bad performance and that of his female co-star should have been spotted in the dailies and dealt with immediately. Why the studio didn't order a re-shoot on these scenes and why they gave them to Letterman, considering how bad they are, I will never know...but it will serve to only harm this film at the box office???

    Reply to Talkback

  • and they arent good. They range from appalling to dreadful, irish Crime writer Declan Burke of the website crimealwayspays.com said it was one of the worst films he has seen in years.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:15:38 PM CDT

    FUCK that new pop-up ad!!!!!!!!!

    by carmillavondoom

    Takes over the whole fucking screen.
    AICN is pretty much the only site that *doesn't* have it. FUCK THAT AD! :P

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:15:47 PM CDT

    I can't help bashing ALL ...

    by prof. pretorious

    his frickin' sorryass movies !!! It's too EASY !! Bwwaawwaahhaah !! What a piece of crap !! Next !! What another piece of crapola !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:18:34 PM CDT

    I think Shymalan is now into that phase

    by emeraldboy

    of his career called law of dimishing returns.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:20:49 PM CDT

    I Like Night.

    by www.valiens.com

    May He Rest In Peace

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:20:56 PM CDT

    Apparently He Wrote The Part For Mark Whalberg?

    by pr1c3y

    Yet from clips it's like he thought Mark Whalberg was David Schwimmer.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:22:35 PM CDT

    Pathetic Loser !!!

    by prof. pretorious

    Yes, Shlammy is rich, but he's a LOSER in the talent department.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:22:55 PM CDT

    "or he is afraid to direct a star"

    by emeraldboy

    That is a really weird sentence because he directed one of the biggest stars of the 1990s. Bruce willis. there seemed to be real tension. there because all the reports suggested that night was a dictator. all the cast were very afraid of him. Haley joel osment.where is he these days?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:24:37 PM CDT

    "it felt like watching someone's career end before your eyes."

    by knuckleduster

    I am so watching this.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:25:09 PM CDT

    Please all remember this is a fox film

    by emeraldboy

    when was the last great fox film?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:25:31 PM CDT

    Shlammy can't direct ...

    by prof. pretorious

    someone to the nearest Men's room ...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:26:21 PM CDT

    George Lucas and M.Night the most hated,

    by xxsoulflyxx

    unjustified people not in Hollywood. Pathetic, really.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:26:27 PM CDT

    it's already HAPPENING!!! tHE SQUIRRELS!!!!

    by turketron

    I saw a squirrel dart into a busy street and get destroyed by a car. Squirrels live in trees. IT'S CRAPPENING!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:26:50 PM CDT

    THE FAPPENING

    by bobjustbob

    I'll wait for cable. If even then. But I'm enjoying everyone's take on M Night and his body of work.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:27:37 PM CDT

    When was there a good ...

    by prof. pretorious

    Shlammy film ?? Anybody ever see one that DIDN'T suck ???

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:29:04 PM CDT

    M. Knight was never anywhere close

    by series7

    To being the next anything. Mr. I will not do movies in Hollywood, I will only do movies in my hometown. Yeah because Pennsylvania has SO much to offer. Also can anyone name ONE director who's made movie after movie based off of an original script they wrote (even though you can't really call M. Knights original, I bet whoever has the copyrights to the Twilight Zone series is digging through law books trying to figure out a way to sue his ass).

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:29:12 PM CDT

    The grass, it's, it's , it's

    by prof. pretorious

    making me want to KILL Shlammydingdong, AHHHUGGHHHGGHH !!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:31:03 PM CDT

    Shlammy $ 1.7 billion worlwide

    by xxsoulflyxx

    'enuff said. Obviuosly alot of people don't think he sucks.

    And I'm quite sure all the media M.Night Haters already had their bad reviews ready before they seen it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:32:12 PM CDT

    problem solved-

    by whatyoufear

    M. Night needs a LaBeef to save his career.. (Shialyaman?)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:32:39 PM CDT

    He SUCKS Worldwide !!!

    by prof. pretorious

    Where doesn't he suck ??? Go, tell us where doesn't he SUCK ???

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:34:20 PM CDT

    Killer grass

    by bobjustbob

    Didn't he have killer grass in his last movie too?And in SIGNS and UNBREAKABLE it was water that was the proverbial kryptonite. I'm Sensing a Sign from Shyamalan. I guess his next movie will have another evil lawn mower.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:35:32 PM CDT

    WOW< water and grass ...

    by prof. pretorious

    as protagonists, as dangerous, WOW now that's DEEP !!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:36:11 PM CDT

    the point of the mother dying in signs

    by novaman5000

    It was showing that bad things happened for a reason, in this case, the reason was to put the characters in a position to stay alive when the invasion happened. The water the water refused to drink, the phone call from the driver showing the father was happening, the swinging of the bat, all things that would not have happened had the woman not died.
    Granted, there was probably other things god could have done to get those messages across, but that's another story.
    As for the people who bitch about the water, do you forget that HG WELLs classic story has pretty much the same ending twist. I've also always been of the mindset that it wasn't the water so much as the bacteria in the water that killed the aliens (seeing as how M Night himself said it was WOTW inspired).
    The little girl says the water is "contaminated" and has "ameobas" in it. And that it "Tastes old". Anyone know what happens to a glass of water after you take a sip and leave it out for a week?
    Regardless, though, water or germs, if you're gonna criticize the gimmick, criticize HG, too.
    Also, talk shit about the alien's design, but that video clip from mexico that they watch on tv was fucking chilling, because you know that's exactly how the first images of aliens would leak out- on the news through home movie footage.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:37:40 PM CDT

    But i'm not apologizing. I liked the movie.

    by novaman5000

    If you didn't, tough shit.
    I'll call out M Night when I think he's fucked up, like in the village and lady in the water. Jury is still out on happening but it's not looking good.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:38:17 PM CDT

    He's stuck on the Wizard of Oz ...

    by prof. pretorious

    hmmmmm, water melt the witch, yes yes, good water melt bad aliens, I'm GENIUS !! Trees scare Dorothy, yes yes, trees scary, I'm GENIUS !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:39:36 PM CDT

    Also, one last thing- the aliens weren't coming to live

    by novaman5000

    on earth. They were coming to take people away. Perhaps they thought it was worth the risk.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:41:40 PM CDT

    Yes, bucket of water melt

    by prof. pretorious

    wicked witch, hmmmmm, let me see, YES water melt wicked aliens who fart with their hands !! Poisonous farts out of their hands YES I AM GENIUS !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:42:08 PM CDT

    anyone who says his career is over is an idiot

    by snitchseeker

    All of his films get made for $70 mil or less. Signs made 400 million worldwide. Even lady in the water, which didn't make back the cash in box office came close enough that every producer got paid profited on DVD sales. Quit your bitching and moaning (unless it's funny). If you hate the guy, don't give him your cash. I won't be. The Happening was made for 50 mil, it could have Speed Racers numbers and be successful.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:42:35 PM CDT

    Any predictions on Harry's review of this?

    by hawaiian organ donor

    What engorged images of the female body will he exploit to relay to us how much he loved this movie?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:43:32 PM CDT

    It can't make Speed's numbers ...

    by prof. pretorious

    I'm too weak to go to the multiplex, ahhhhh, grass giving off poisonous farts ....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:51:02 PM CDT

    I will not see any movie besides The Dark Knight

    by thebearovingian

    The Dark Knight will rule all. The Dark Knight is the only summer movie that matters. I will not watch any movie besides The Dark Knight. The Dark Knight rules all. The Dark Knight is the only film that matters. I will not go to any movie besides The Dark Knight. The Dark Knight...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:51:45 PM CDT

    Get it??

    by prof. pretorious

    Poisonous farts coming out of their hands ?? Get it?? Ahahahhah, what a genius, poisonous alien farts !!! What a frickin' GENIUS !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:57:12 PM CDT

    Get it??

    by prof. pretorious

    The evil aliens come to Earth, but water make them disappear !! Get it?? I write that !! I am Genius !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 2:58:48 PM CDT

    Uh-oh !!

    by prof. pretorious

    Suddenly everybody's too weak to tap their keyboards !! OHHHHH NOOOO it's the PLANTS !!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 3:01:36 PM CDT

    The Talkbackers have been affected !!!

    by prof. pretorious

    Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh Nooooooooooooooooo !!! Must keep moving fingers, uhhhhh, must resist urge to hit keyboard against my head, must resisssssssss

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 3:02:39 PM CDT

    m.night IS talented director

    by cloudrider`

    if you dont think he is, then the idiot is you. he knows his craft, and the hitchcock's comparison(i'm talking about mastery of suspense here, not filmography) is actually warranted. while hitchcock is all technic with no heart - most of the time, his characters are just boring chess pieces, m.night's actually injects humanity in his films.

    and can you really blame his ego got so big when he was just 24 by the time sixth sense broke records and grossed 600 million worldwide?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 3:05:30 PM CDT

    I'm sure M Night will still get work

    by bobjustbob

    But I expect he'll have to either except (much) smaller budgets or tighter studio control. This is under the assumption that THE FAPPENING will be the box office disaster that many are predicting. I expect $60 million tops.

    IMO the Emperor has no clothes and he will have to adjust to a world that no longer puts him on a pedestal. Its now up to him to deflate his ego and come out of the delusional bubble his been living in for the better part of a decade.
    Once again, IMO.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 3:05:47 PM CDT

    He's no Hitch

    by prof. pretorious

    WRONGO !!! He ain't a pimple on Hitch's fat ass !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 3:06:36 PM CDT

    that said...

    by cloudrider`

    i hate his twist endings! and i really reaaaaally hate the fact that everyone was talking about how 'cool' and 'original' the ending in sixth sense was when it came out.

    twist endings can only work when no scenes earlier in the film could contradict it. it's just not the case with sixth sense.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 3:07:10 PM CDT

    Here's Hoping !!!

    by prof. pretorious

    That when this one tanks, the studios will QUIT handing him money to piss away !!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 3:08:38 PM CDT

    The Sick Sense !!!

    by prof. pretorious

    Get it?? He's dead !! He been dead the whole picture !! I fool you, eh? I GENIUS !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 3:10:52 PM CDT

    Maybe this time ...

    by prof. pretorious

    the lack of boxoffice will burst his delusional bubble !! Maybe this will be his frickin' wake up call !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 3:13:05 PM CDT

    Prof. Pretorious

    by cloudrider`

    hitchcock's charaters are cardboard cutouts. i'm pretty sure he'd be the first to admit that. his sole interest is creating suspense, everything else is secondary.

    that said, nor m.night or even spielberg can make the kinds of films they've made were hitchcock not there to show them how.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 3:14:35 PM CDT

    Mundane Night was 27 when Sixth Sense came out

    by hawaiian organ donor

    And if he wasn't such a Douchey McDouche he would have kept a level head like Spielberg did. Look at his first six films: The Sugarland Express, Jaws, Close Encounters, 1941, Raiders and E.T. Of those only 1941 was considered a misfire and it's still a pretty good movie.Compare that to M. Night's first six films. He should have hung his ego at the door and directed other people's scripts.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 3:16:06 PM CDT

    Mediocre Nighty Night ??

    by prof. pretorious

    Suspense, what suspense ?? The suspense of how long will people put up with this ego maniac?? The suspense of when he'll finall crash and burn???

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 3:22:27 PM CDT

    Uh-oh !!

    by prof. pretorious

    It's gone quiet again !! Auughhh, must resist urge to kill egomaniac, stupid directors auughghghhghhghhhhhhh

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 3:29:32 PM CDT

    Wow !!

    by prof. pretorious

    It's reaaalllly quiet, hmm, better stay indoors away from plants, hmmmmmmmmmm

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 3:37:44 PM CDT

    yeah he should direct other scripts

    by cloudrider`

    people have been saying that forever. i still believe in his directing skills, it's just his writing gets more and more retarded with each film. seems he's written himself into a corner and cant get free.

    and spielberg did about 5 years worth of tv episodes before the studio let him do film. m.night's carrer skyrocketed much much faster. i'm not trying to defend him - he DOES have major ego problem. i'm just saying, if anyone here were that succesfull that young, would your head not swell to as well?

    come on... some of aicn's resident writers are already thinking they're big shots just because they co-wrote a script.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 3:42:13 PM CDT

    Yeah, it would be hard to maintain

    by prof. pretorious

    ANY sort of perspective, but still ... The trailer with him telling us how fortunate we are that he's made another movie !! How delusional is THAT !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 3:44:08 PM CDT

    plus

    by cloudrider`

    spielberg may act humble in public, but how do you know if he's not jerking off to himself in the mirror every night?

    some directors just hide his ego better than others, but you just know how much of a bigshot he realy thinks he is. lucas comes to mind.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 3:47:07 PM CDT

    Augghhhghghhghhhhhhh !@!

    by prof. pretorious

    Don't say Lucas !!! Aughghghgh !! Now I said it !!! What an ego maniac !! What a jerk !! He stole my childhood !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 3:52:37 PM CDT

    Spielberg may have an ego

    by bobjustbob

    the size of Montana but he also has a body of work to back it up. With Shyamalan, not as much. Spielberg also appears to interact with others in the business and has had many succesful collaborations. Shyamalan appears to live in a bubble and does not collaborate at all.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 3:54:09 PM CDT

    I will agree that Hitchcock could manipulate

    by skimn

    and enhance performances with editing, camera angle, cinematography and such (just like directors and editors are supposed to), but to call his characters cardboard?? Jimmy Stewart in Vertigo or Rear Window..Cary Grant in Notorious or North By Northwest..The brilliant way he makes the audience feel sad, anxious, scared of Norman Bates..

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 3:54:29 PM CDT

    Spielsberg is a director...

    by prof. pretorious

    he contributes to the scripts, but mostly sticks to the actual filming. Shlammy sets up shots that look like a first year film student at USC did them...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 3:54:41 PM CDT

    I hope M.Night's career is finally over

    by batzilla

    so we can be put out of his misery. That guy was a one hit (if that) wonder and I am just PRAYING that Hollywood now sees what the rest of us already know. MNS is a fucking HACK! I hope a fucking tree falls on him and crushes him like a tomato. SPLAT!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 3:56:10 PM CDT

    cloudrider

    by hawaiian organ donor

    After Jaws, Close Encounters, E.T., three Indy movies, Empire of the Sun, Jurassic Park, Schindler's List, Amistad, Private Ryan, Munich and Minority Report, Spielberg can jerk off into a mirror all he wants. In fact, let him slam us in the ass without the courtesy of a reach around. Even taking WoTW and KoTCS into account, he's still earned it.And yes, the AICN guys have some very impressive egos which may eventually be their undoing.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 3:56:37 PM CDT

    i was not aware of that trailer.

    by cloudrider`

    hehe... i think we can all agree that m.night's ego clouds his perspective. i actually dont mind when a director shoots his ego all over our faces, as long as he keeps delivering the goods. i mean, it's his works we(as lovers of films) should care about, right? that's what we're paying for, right? it's when his ego gets in the way of his skills is when it's getting frustrating to me. the same can also be said of tarantino.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:00:07 PM CDT

    Mediocre Nighty Night won't

    by prof. pretorious

    even give us a reacharound !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:00:36 PM CDT

    Spielberg's ego?

    by mattmanreturns

    Spielberg is fairly humble, actually. M. Night has a bloated ego that he hasn't earned. Spielberg never cast himself as a messiah, or addressed his critics on film.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:02:02 PM CDT

    Auughghhghhhg !!!

    by prof. pretorious

    YOU little maggot, you make want to vomit !!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:03:37 PM CDT

    skimn

    by cloudrider`

    i said "most of the time". but watch italian or french films made during that era, and you'll see how paper thin hitchcock's characters are. his films are suspense driven, and characters often function little more than plot devices.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:05:31 PM CDT

    Not Vertigo !!

    by prof. pretorious

    That flick was one of his best ... I guess the characters were somewhat thin in "The Birds", though.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:07:15 PM CDT

    The Sick Sense !!!

    by prof. pretorious

    is VASTLY over rated !!! Without the lead actors he got, it woulda sucked !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • I'm going to kill someone. "Signs" wasn't about family conflict you morons. Over analyzing movies like this is really retarded. "Signs" was the story of an alien invasion both boring and unrealistic (but more the former). It's also shitty, long, unfunny, thrill less poorly-acted and a shitty M. Night's movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:11:02 PM CDT

    what's happening? the happening's happening, THAT'S what's happe

    by mr_macphisto

    ...where am I?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:14:51 PM CDT

    Aliens ???

    by prof. pretorious

    There were aliens in Signs Yer Retardeddd?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:16:20 PM CDT

    Despite its flaws I like Signs.

    by drewlicious

    Logistically the invasion doesn't hold up. However an invasion that does hold up to scrutiny would ultimately end with our species being wiped out entirely. If anything the movie is manipulation at its best. How you feel about that is up to you. There are several moments in that movie that had me crawling out of my skin, which doesn't happen often, with the birthday party scene being the freakiest. Too bad I can't say anything similar about anything he's made ever since. Fortunately the solution to most of his problems is rather simple, let someone else write the script!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:20:09 PM CDT

    cloudrider

    by skimn

    It is ironic you mention the French, when Mr. Truffaut authored one of, if not the definitive book on Hitchcock's career. And Truffaut, who helped introduce the auteur theory, of which Hitchock is considered a prime example..And of course, by refining his craft within the parameters of the "thriller", his characters sometime did exist to propel the plot and nothing else. As beloved as "The Birds" is, I don't think anyone's running to give Tippi Hedren or Rod Taylor a retroactive Oscar.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:20:23 PM CDT

    I remember that Time mag issue from a few years ago...

    by toowhippy

    Where he was accepting of the "new Speilberg" label the magazine was giving him. This guy is not humble. Maybe after a few more bombs he will start telling good stories again. Who knows? He just comes off like an ass most of the time.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:21:08 PM CDT

    Crawling out my mouth !!

    by prof. pretorious

    There were moments in SIGNS that made my breakfast crawl outta my mouth !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:21:53 PM CDT

    bobjustbob....

    by snitchseeker

    $60 Million and they'd be in the black, budget was like $57 or something...before DVD sales. The truth is his success rate is ridiculous. So studios will keep letting him make (already) tight budgeted movies in hopes that they'll hit and make 6 times their budget

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:22:49 PM CDT

    Salemslut

    by cloudrider`

    it seems that m.night's ego, more than anything, is what infuriates the geeks.

    i agree with you that other far worse directors are not given due attention. and we should be directing less venom m.night's way, and more bay's/lucas's/the guy who did the mummy/the guy who did fast and furious/and a bunch of other hacks's ways

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:23:17 PM CDT

    Keep Hoping !!!

    by prof. pretorious

    The studios keep hoping that there's enough retards to show up for his flicks with Mommy's hard earned money in their chubby hand !!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:24:49 PM CDT

    The Sick Sense !!!

    by prof. pretorious

    got lucky, that's all. Pure luck !!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:31:24 PM CDT

    The Sick Sense !!!

    by prof. pretorious

    came out at the same time as The Phantom Smell, so it got the benefit of tons of butts in the seats ...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:31:36 PM CDT

    skimn

    by cloudrider`

    i'm aware of the auteur theory, and yes i'm aware of the book on hitchcock. never read it. but if i'm not mistaken truffaut was one of hitchcock's biggest critic.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:32:19 PM CDT

    Speaking of Speilberg.....

    by nukethefridge

    I want me some Jurassic Park IV

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:33:30 PM CDT

    I know a SUCKY movie

    by prof. pretorious

    when I see one, that's fer damn shure ...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:36:21 PM CDT

    Hitch was one of the great directors...

    by prof. pretorious

    there's been nobody since even come close ...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:37:51 PM CDT

    Augghhhghghhghhhhhhh !@!

    by prof. pretorious

    it's the daffodils, they're giving off poisonous fumes, I mean farts !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:39:35 PM CDT

    Signs is on TBS on a regular basis lately

    by smackfu

    And each time it's on, I can sit through it, or let it run as background noise while I'm on the computer. It's not as bad as people make it out to be.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:40:18 PM CDT

    A Deranged Narcissist

    by japra

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:41:09 PM CDT

    Signs ?????

    by prof. pretorious

    it's not as bad as people say, IT"s FREAKIN' TEN THOUSAND TIMES WORSE !!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:44:02 PM CDT

    Augghhhghghhghhhhhhh !@!

    by prof. pretorious

    It's the Petunias They're, well you know what they're doing !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:45:35 PM CDT

    sure, truffaut came to admire hitchcock at the end

    by cloudrider`

    but he was one of his dectractor, and of the 'stagey' and 'phony' hollywood films at the time, hence the birth of the french personal films.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:48:11 PM CDT

    sign is not bad

    by cloudrider`

    until the ending reveals itself and turns the whole movie stupid.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:50:09 PM CDT

    Signs (that you're a retard)

    by prof. pretorious

    1. You keep saying "it's not that bad"

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:52:28 PM CDT

    Happening: Day of the Triffids Rip-Off

    by zinc_chameleon

    Which come to think of it, was much scarier book than a movie. The triffids win in the book. Seawater kills them in the silly 1962 film. John Wyndham's estate should sue Shamalamadingdong.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:54:30 PM CDT

    Prof. Pretorious??

    by snitchseeker

    How much time do you have today? You're posting every three minutes and none of it has been interesting.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:55:05 PM CDT

    The Triffids that spit poison

    by prof. pretorious

    and kill ??? If the flowers spit poison, that woulda been cool...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:56:18 PM CDT

    I gots lots of time,

    by prof. pretorious

    to kick a RETARD when he's down !!! Bwawhahahahahah !! (Now THAT was FUNNY !!!)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 4:57:42 PM CDT

    Augghhhghghhghhhhhhh !@!

    by prof. pretorious

    It's the Man-in-the-moon Marigolds !! They're farting poison gassssssssss

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 5:02:41 PM CDT

    So yeah M. Night sucks

    by optimuscrime

    But on an unrelated matter, whats the consensus here on the eating of pussy? Now me, I'm not for it, but I just had a co-worker go on a ten minute rant about how great it is. So let's get down to brass tacks: are we pussy-eaters on this website or are we not?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 5:09:35 PM CDT

    Augghhhghghhghhhhhhh !@!

    by prof. pretorious

    It's thew Black Eyed Susans !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 5:09:38 PM CDT

    The critics are coming out for M

    by skimn

    Look at Rotten Tomatoes. Even the Philly critic doesn't spare him.BTW, thanks Salemslut for getting the facts straight on Hitch.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 5:10:57 PM CDT

    Augghhhghghhghhhhhhh !@!

    by prof. pretorious

    It's the Weeping Willows !! They're farting poisonous gassssss

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 5:11:12 PM CDT

    Optimus

    by skimn

    Only chocolate covered...its an AICN thing.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 5:11:38 PM CDT

    Home

    by nudeandaroused

    This movie was filmed literally five minutes from my house.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 5:12:53 PM CDT

    The New Yorker hated it, as did Daily Variety,

    by prof. pretorious

    as did EVERY critic that was forced to sit through this mess

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 5:21:46 PM CDT

    Only a total Ego maniac

    by prof. pretorious

    would keep filming in Pannsylvania !! He thinks he's Woddy Allen, with manhatton !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 5:23:13 PM CDT

    Augghhhghghhghhhhhhh !@!

    by prof. pretorious

    It's the daisys !!! They're farting poisonous gassssss !! I want to kill myself AUGHGGHHHHGH !! Must resist urge !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 5:24:27 PM CDT

    Rotten Tomatoes !!!

    by prof. pretorious

    How touchingly ironic !! The tomatoes in the spew poisonous farts !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 5:28:13 PM CDT

    for the movie signs...

    by toowhippy

    The aliens invade a planet that is 70% water and they don't have protective suits against the water? But they have the knowledge to travel in space? I just don't get why people like signs at all. The story didn't make any sence and the tension/suspence wasn't enough to keep me from asking those questions. Night is so overrated.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 5:31:53 PM CDT

    Signs ?????

    by prof. pretorious

    what a smelly load !! How anyone can defend that turd in a punchbowl is beyond understanding !!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 5:34:02 PM CDT

    Hahahah

    by series7

    just saw a clip of this from Letterman last night. And guess what? SOMETHINGS HAPPENING! Lame.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 5:38:36 PM CDT

    I didn't mean to imply that Spielberg does have an ego

    by bobjustbob

    I meant to say EVEN IF Spielberg had an ego...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 5:41:10 PM CDT

    I read a...

    by suntzu77

    spoiler filled review just the other day...and the so called "twist" (actually it's not really a twist) is just asinine.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 5:42:13 PM CDT

    Wot Happens ???

    by prof. pretorious

    The Happening is that the freakin' audience goes out to the lobby for popcorn, and goes to a different flick !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 5:42:43 PM CDT

    If you're interested in reading the review...

    by suntzu77

    Click on the following... but warning...it's filled with spoilers.

    http://www.collider.com/entertainment/reviews/article.asp?aid=7903&tcid=1

    make sure the double check the link for unintended spaces.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 5:43:54 PM CDT

    Augghhhghghhghhhhhhh !@!

    by prof. pretorious

    the twist is that the entire audience groans when they realize two hours of their life is gone forever, spent watching this load of shit !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 5:48:03 PM CDT

    Oh nm...

    by suntzu77

    It's a spoiler talkback. My bad. Yup that's correct...the plants on earth have decided to fight against mankind and have released neurotoxins. Yup, that's the movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 5:50:13 PM CDT

    Wow. Now 12% on Rotten Tomatoes

    by bobjustbob

    Expect reviews on this site to include stuff like "silly", "B-Movies", "tense dialogue", "solid performances, and "chocolate covered strawberries stuff in anus."The funny thing is I think I decided to watch UNBREAKABLE this weekend.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 5:52:40 PM CDT

    You mean "Unwatchable"

    by prof. pretorious

    That title pretty much sums up all his movies ....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 5:54:14 PM CDT

    It's!!!!!!!!!!!!

    by suntzu77

    M. Knight's re-imagining of Attack of the Killer Tomatoes!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 5:55:06 PM CDT

    I can't wait until 2040

    by bobjustbob

    Because that is when I assume that this site will get an EFFING EDIT BUTTON. And possibly a KILL button too...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 5:55:54 PM CDT

    "Best Performance Offscreen

    by prof. pretorious

    for an Ego Maniac Pompous Ass" !!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:02:49 PM CDT

    Attack of The Rotten Killer Tomatoes

    by prof. pretorious

    Hope it gets an all time worst review rating !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:04:35 PM CDT

    Augghhhghghhghhhhhhh !@!

    by prof. pretorious

    It's the dandelions !! They're farting poisonous gassss !! Must kill myself !! Must kill !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:07:12 PM CDT

    Augghhhghghhghhhhhhh !@!

    by prof. pretorious

    It's the mushrooms !!! They're, wait a second, they're fungi, not plants, hmmmmmm, Fungi from Yuggoth ???

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:09:22 PM CDT

    Poor Zooey !!

    by prof. pretorious

    This piece of shit, plus that Oz piece of shit equals short career arc ??

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:11:15 PM CDT

    WAIT !! WHAT'S THAT ??

    by prof. pretorious

    only 324 posts ??? I can fix that !!! Ummm, Shlcammmydingdong ego maniac self deluded piece of shit movie, there !! Viola !! 325 !!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:13:41 PM CDT

    I don't know about the rest of you ...

    by prof. pretorious

    but I hope this ends this ego nutbag's career for once and all !! Bollywood's calling, Schlammy !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:14:47 PM CDT

    The Talkbackers have been affected !!!

    by prof. pretorious

    Boards gone quiet again ..... Must stay away from windows, must stay indoors, away from Multiplexes ...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:16:15 PM CDT

    Strange Lull in this talkback ....

    by prof. pretorious

    hmmmmm, Talkbackers must be sniffing the daisys ...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:16:57 PM CDT

    326:Pretorious gets stoned death after pot plants

    by xxsoulflyxx

    give off toxins causing Talkback fever and talking to one's self.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:19:08 PM CDT

    "His 1st RATED-R FILM!!1oneeleventy"

    by fathermcgruderkicksassforthelord

    After the marketing campaign, I'm glad to see this one fall hard.

    How a director could vanish up his own ass I understand - but what posesses the studio(s) to follow him?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:23:08 PM CDT

    "M. Night Shyamalan used to have ...

    by fathermcgruderkicksassforthelord

    ... a vast army of fans. Now he has a dwindling network of apologists."

    From The Onion AV Club's review.

    Have truer words ever been spoken?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:26:50 PM CDT

    Apologists !!

    by prof. pretorious

    SWEET !!!! That totally sums it up !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:28:38 PM CDT

    Apologize for THIS !!!

    by prof. pretorious

    Bwahahahahah !!! Hey !! Sniff my finger !!! Hahahhhaah !! I touched the flowers !!! Hahahahha !!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:34:20 PM CDT

    Augghhhghghhghhhhhhh !@!

    by prof. pretorious

    It's the Pot Plants, whhhhooopppps, they already give off noxious gassssssss !!
    eheheehhehehheh

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:35:28 PM CDT

    The Talkbackers have been affected !!!

    by prof. pretorious

    They've sniffed the Poison fumes from the Ficus trees !!!
    AUGHHUGHUGHUUUHHH !!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:37:56 PM CDT

    Ohhhhhhhh Noooooooo !!!!

    by prof. pretorious

    It's the poison fumes from the Poison IVy !!! Oooohhoohooho, scary, scary, scary, I'm soooooooo scared !!! Must stay indoors and keep typing .....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:43:35 PM CDT

    The Talkbackers have been affected !!!

    by prof. pretorious

    they've been gassed by poison plant farts !!! They've decided to expose their eyes to a horrible movie that will suck their life right out !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:44:54 PM CDT

    Holy Poisonous Farts, Batman !!

    by prof. pretorious

    Looks like the work of evil plants and trees !!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:47:32 PM CDT

    Shlammy sat thinking ...

    by prof. pretorious

    let's see, I've ruined dead people, aliens,remote villages, hmmmm, religion, hmmmm, I KNOW!!! I'll ruin plants and trees !! Yeah, that's the ticket, I'll screw that up so bad no one will ever use it again !!! I GENIUS !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:52:17 PM CDT

    And 1 more to make it

    by prof. pretorious

    three hundred and forty !!!
    Bwahhahaahahahhahahah !!!
    I've been poisoned, aughhghghghghghhhhhhhhhh !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:53:48 PM CDT

    Whew !!!

    by prof. pretorious

    It's a lot of freakin' work slamming Schlammy all day long !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:55:50 PM CDT

    "Not the trees!"

    by jackpumpkinhead

    "Oh, god, they're before my eyes! How'd they get burned? HOWDTHEYGETBURNED? Aaah, my legs!" <-- the only way to save this movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:56:24 PM CDT

    What a Retard !!

    by prof. pretorious

    What a maroon !!! Hahahhaha !! Schlammy thinks he's a genius !!! This is the worst yet !!
    It'll make Lady in the Toliet look GOOD !!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 6:58:20 PM CDT

    Watch out Jackpumpkinhead !!

    by prof. pretorious

    The trees are after you !!
    Ooooohhhhh, scary scary scary scary scary scary !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 7:23:34 PM CDT

    Isn't Uma Thurman in this film?

    by suntzu77

    Doesn't she play "Poison Ivy" in "The Happening?"

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 8:08:11 PM CDT

    Needs a confusing ending that makes you wonder

    by batman_cape

    why you wasted 2 hours.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 8:24:15 PM CDT

    After Signs...

    by 9000rpm

    ...I vowed to never waste another penny on this twat. And let's see, The Village, LITW, and now an even more despised Happening. I feel like I invested $100,000 in Apple stock during its low point in the '90s. I told you so.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 8:38:12 PM CDT

    Sixth Sense...

    by dataset

    I saw it in one of those lousy eat while you watch a movie places (The Granada in Dallas, which has turned into a great concert hall). In the middle of the movie, I wrote "HE IS DEAD" on my napkin with the pen that the waitress had me sign my bill with. I told everyone I knew the secret, and placed the napkin under my date's purse. I was so horrified that it was correct. And everyone praised me, but I felt so sad. There's a lot of people more clever than me. I so wanted to be surprised. Like when Keyser Sose's limp went away. But it was not to be. :(

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 8:47:36 PM CDT

    SIGNS

    by bobjustbob

    was the last Shyamalan film I paid to see too. My date was so pissed at me for taking her to such a shite movie she made me watch an Antonio Banderas movie with her the following week. I will never forgive M Night for this.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 8:49:32 PM CDT

    Suicides are imitated every time they appear in film or on TV...

    by lettersoftransit

    ...no matter how it's presented, as a good thing, as a bad thing, as painless and bringing on many changes, however. That's what the research says anyway. Can't help but wonder how many will do the deed after seeing this film.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:18:22 PM CDT

    WHAT HAPPENED TO GONE?

    by snitchseeker

    I liked it. And I really liked the talkback. End the silence, demand answers.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:31:02 PM CDT

    GOOD NIGHT M NIGHT!!!!

    by ebertsfatthumb

    If this guy gets to make another movie then we know he is blowing a slew of people in Hollywood.

    If Harry gives a glowing review then we know Harry is in that happy list.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:40:54 PM CDT

    Does Marky Mark rap?

    by batman_cape

  • Jun 12, 2008 9:42:41 PM CDT

    Hopefully this will make him...

    by bobo_vision

    ...take feedback from others when shaping his projects. He needs a good team to work with who can give him constructive criticism instead of blowing smoke up his ass telling him how brilliant he is. This won't end his career, he IS a talented director, but they really need to drop the whole ad campaign for Night's films where every trailer has the line, "From the director who brought you ______" His filmography is mixed, so that scheme won't fly anymore. He just needs to realize he's not invincible and change his current approach.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 10:40:26 PM CDT

    To the dude who called me a "jerkoff"

    by darthvedder81

    It worked! By calling me a jerkoff I've come to your side! I hate "Signs"! I now distrust my own tastes! Thank you for showing me the way with your insightful correction!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 10:52:37 PM CDT

    I knew from the trailers...

    by snakeplissken711

    It's pretty interesting because after seeing the trailers in theatres I leaned over to my gilrfriend and said, "I bet it's the trees that are emitting a deadly gas or something..." Needless to say watch the previews, almost every other shot has trees or green foilage in a very "look I'm here", in the framing approach. I guess it's noble to try and make a movie about the most sentient and non-violent creatures on the planet being mankind's bedall -- but I think that once this is explained it will be harder to generate suspense. Hitchcock could do it. Maybe even a younger John Carpenter, but Shyamalan's VILLAGE fell apart after the twist and I have the feeling the same will happen here. He's been on the downward slide since THE VILLAGE (I know people hate SIGNS - but $227 million is pretty fucking successful) -- and this will probably be the end of his career. Should have stuck to directing others scripts.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 11:01:59 PM CDT

    Quit quoting Rotten Tomatoes scores, idiots.

    by zacdilone

    There are only about 36 reviews on there. I love when people jump in so early with RT statistics as proof their side of the argument is correct. Of course, I'm not saying I expect "The Happening"'s score to go up once more reviews appear. I expect it to go down, because I anticipate it to be a total turd of a film. But it's no use bringing those statistics to bear until we have more reviews.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 11:06:13 PM CDT

    Are any of you actually going to see this?

    by sambrook

    Or are you just going to slag it off based on preconceptions and what you've read? Even worse you'll probably be one of those who pretends they've seen it and compains and mocks scenes that they've read about in plot descriptions - you know, like 90% of the people who attack Speed Racer. "Oh, a film about plants killing people, that's STOOPID!! **lolz** I know, how many nicknames can we come up with for the director?" Christ, it's like a bunch of bitter, neglected twelve year olds in here. Of course you can't see it, it's rated R.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 11:28:12 PM CDT

    Dataset- I did the same thing

    by macktheknife01

    I went to military school for college and I neither the time nor the inclination to see Sixth sense when it came out so my little brother picked me up at the airport for the summer and said, Oh dude you have to see the sixth sense its awesome it has a twist. And all id seen was the billboard and I told him Bruce Willis was dead he told me i was right and so I never even got to enjoy that M. Night movie. But seriously The Usual Suspects has a much better twist.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 11:41:47 PM CDT

    SAD

    by pauduro

    Its sad that so many guys out ther that LOVEEEEEEEEEE this dush think "The hapening" is not good AND THIS GUYS LOVED Mnigthsgsheida lamadingdong`s movies so what can the people that think all his stuff is pretentious and boring spect? well i think il go see kunfu panda ones more and see how a REAL director dos a film

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 11:51:46 PM CDT

    Shyamalany

    by jackofhearts29

    ... is the result of mating experiments between Stephen King and Deepak Chopra

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 12, 2008 11:54:00 PM CDT

    signs doesn';t have a twist. unbreakable doesnt have a twist

    by slappy jones

    why everyone goes on and on about all of his films having twists is beyond me. what exactly is the twist to unbreakable?? that sam jackson is the bad guy?? woah....no way? that changes the entire film that has come before it. um actually no it doesn't. there is a big difference between a twist and a reveal. finding out who the bad guy is isn't a twist. If we had been lead to believe that there was no way sam jackson could in anyway possibly be a bad guy then yes it would be a twist but that ending is hardly a twist. And Signs...what exactly is the twist there? that aliens are afraid of water..that water kills them? again not a twist. what was the twist in lady in the water? it didn't have one either. The Village has one and so does the sixth sense. So he has two twists out of how many films yet everyone goes on about him using twists everytime when he doesn't.

    Oh the happening is horrible. Do not see it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 13, 2008 12:12:35 AM CDT

    I WANTED SNICKERING TREES.

    by alice 13

    and grass that would trip humans. im giving my houseplants extra water just in case.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 13, 2008 12:40:45 AM CDT

    The planet's defend sistem.

    by angusthecow

    If the whole deal is with the trees why does the film's survivors are in a rural area while the casualties happen in the cities...unless the trees move...maybe it is just "Hellboy 2" faeries atacking yai! or worse Tom cruise.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 13, 2008 1:23:47 AM CDT

    sambrook

    by stevie grant

    Funny you mention that, cause I will not watch this movie because it's about plant's randomly causing suicide while assuming that the movie is well made and entertaining. Yet, sadly, I can't get past how stupid the plot is... you know, the kind of extra special retarded that can only sit in the stands of the Special Olympics, retarded. And lame, so, so lame.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 13, 2008 1:25:49 AM CDT

    damnit,

    by stevie grant

    I really got to edit posts better. Despite from syntax and such, yall get my point.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 13, 2008 2:19:12 AM CDT

    ATTACK OF THE PINE TREES!!

    by batman_cape

  • Jun 13, 2008 2:49:24 AM CDT

    did Pretorius finally die?

    by kungfuhustler84

    I guess the marijuana plants were affected too. ass.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 13, 2008 5:41:04 AM CDT

    Night always explain his movies....

    by emeraldboy

    they are not twists, they are clarifications. In the end...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 13, 2008 6:59:42 AM CDT

    I loved the trailer...

    by ricardomontalban

    I loved "Sixth Sense" and "Village," so I'll give M. Night one more shot. Why not... it can't be any worse then "Indy 4."

    Hey movie fans, check out this awesome new movie blog on blogspot. It's called thebitterproducer

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 13, 2008 11:07:16 AM CDT

    Ebert liked it?

    by toowhippy

    I thought he was dead?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 13, 2008 12:10:24 PM CDT

    I've got a plot for ya...

    by drewlicious

    A critically acclaimed writer/director attempts to make his masterpiece which is so pretentious that by the end he dissapears up his own asshole. What a twist!!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 13, 2008 1:03:30 PM CDT

    M-O-M enough

    by g-ride9000

    leave the bay thing alone dude....yes I know "fuck Bay" yes fuck him but gggggooooddd ddddaaaammm let's just concentrate on the fact that M night is trash from the breman class.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 13, 2008 1:10:28 PM CDT

    Memories-Of-Murder

    by mr. nice gaius

    What you always seem to forget is that there was a whole legion of fanboys who went to see TRANSFORMERS with the pre-expressed, written intent of hating it. You know what? A lot of them came out of the theater liking the movie. A lot of those same people admitted as much on THIS site. Much to your chagrin.Bottom line: Bay's movie entertained. For the most part, it achieved one of the Three E's of film (Enlighten, Educate, Entertain). If M. Night's film is incapable of doing any of that, then it stands be a failure.As a fan of M. Night's earlier work, I'm bummed that his film making prowess has taken a turn for the worse. And face it, the word of mouth on this thing is abysmal. And it doesn't bode well that his next film is AIRBENDER (!)...Make of that what you will, M-O-M.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 13, 2008 1:16:00 PM CDT

    It aint the twists that Night gets right, it's the other stuff..

    by lettersoftransit

    His talents lay much more in the personal moments. That is what really made sixth sense work. I couldn't believe it when I saw that film and three minutes in I figured Willis was dead and I was only surprised because, at first, I thought, no it's just too obvious. Is this really leading toward a "whoops, I'm dead!" finale. (Harlan Ellison's phrase). Sure enough, the surprise for me was that he was going for the incredible SF cliche and that hardly anyone in the theater seemed to see it coming. Because there was so much nice emotional stuff along the way they didn't stop to think about the obvious conclusion. Each later film had essentially the same problems, only more so. And the audience, looking for twists in the later films, wasn't distracted by the emotional stuff, and too much of the emotional stuff was also tied in directly with the "twists" (I couldn't believe the audience tolerated "swing away" but, there, too, it was in the midst of one of the more relatably creepy moments in the film). With the village, it seemed that a lot of people knew the "twist" at the end long before the movie ended, but the performances were good and it was interesting to wonder what drove these people to create this environment. With that film, however, he crossed the line where the scary elements and the "twist" ending both decidedly became more liability than asset. He should set out to do something without any mystical elements and without any surprises, and he might surprise us and himself with something great.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 13, 2008 1:39:19 PM CDT

    M-O-M I won't

    by g-ride9000

    I never said nobody should see this movie. I simple said that everyone who knows "Plants killed everyone" is the end of this film, should go see it. hehehe

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 13, 2008 1:39:47 PM CDT

    PLANT!

    by g-ride9000

  • Jun 13, 2008 1:57:36 PM CDT

    "Which doesn't bode too well for the spieces, does it?"

    by mr. nice gaius

    Opinions, opinions. When will you learn to grasp the concept of other peoples opinions...And I too will not rejoice if M. Night fails. I'd rather have him succeed = I will rejoice when he succeeds.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 13, 2008 2:12:44 PM CDT

    M-O-M

    by mr. nice gaius

    Quote: "I know fully well the concept of opinions."Well, some would argue that you only know full well the concept of your OWN opinion.Quote: "but if you ask me, i rather be with the bad news and know it by what they are, then to go live in a dream illusion build on lies."WOW. That's quite a ponderous statement to be throwing the way of M. Night or Mikey Bay. I think you give too much credence to both. No opinion there; merely a straight forward observation.Quote: "And that's exactly what i'm talking about here, or rather, what i'm not, which is, opinions."And I'm not sure this sentence even makes any sense...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jun 13, 2008 2:46:41 PM CDT

    Ireland just voted down the Lisbon

    by emeraldboy

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback