Cool News
DAWN OF THE DEAD...The Romero Original...Returning Soon To Theaters...In 3-D!?!?
Merrick here...
In-Three, the same company that's working with Lucas to transform the STAR WARS films into 3-D has been commissioned convert George A. Romero's DAWN OF THE DEAD into a 3-D presentation suitable for theatrical release.
New Amsterdam Entertainment has tapped 3-D company In-Three, which will use its proprietary "dimensionalization" process to turn the 1978 indie horror flick movie into 3-D. The project is expected to be completed within the year.
...says THIS ARTICLE in Hollywood Reporter.
In-Three presented some 3-D footage from STAR WARS at ShoWest a few years ago. I didn't actually see it myself, but I've talked to numerous (usually picky) folks who were blown away by the process. While DAWN might be seen as an unusual choice for such treatment, the end result (technically) should be rather effective.
To date, THE NIGHTMARE BEFORE CHRISTMAS is the only non standard film to be fully converted and re-issued in 3-D. It'll hit theaters again next year...around the same time as DAWN, perhaps?
New Amsterdam Entertainment has tapped 3-D company In-Three, which will use its proprietary "dimensionalization" process to turn the 1978 indie horror flick movie into 3-D. The project is expected to be completed within the year.
-
+ Expand All
-
i like zombie.. you like??
-
Enough! I am sick and fucking tired of this! These films were not meant to be three-dimensional! It's like colorizing them for Christ's sake! When will this fad (and it is a fad) DIE?
-
Nuff said! So WILL be catching that when its done Although the Exorcist is bloody good too. Come to think of it - Exorcist in 3D could kick some serious ass too!
-
Are still a go? I haven't heard news about these in years. I figured it was just a pipedream.
-
Would be cool. Cockroaches bursting out of E.G. towards the audience.
-
Because I have never seen the Nightmare 3-D showing anywhere.
-
just convert porn to 3D. 'Nuff said.
-
Ive seen xmas play all over the place. if they do the disney digital. I know rave and amc both had xmas both the past years in columbus.
-
...the process. Can someone explain? Do you need glasses? Does shit just look more "in your face"? This shit just seems unnecessary.
-
The film is not a action film - its more narrative based- THis is dumb- ROmero always has his hand out
-
that a low-fi indie horror classic is being tarted up for a 3-D release.
Not sure to be happy it's been selected over the standard blockbuster summer fare or sad that part of the appeal for me on initial watchings was watching it in the dark on my own in my living room on grainy VHS. Super hi-def and 3D-ing the crap out of this is a bizarre venture but one I'll probably try and catch should it come to fruition -
May 19, 2008 10:20:53 AM CDT
Real fans don't need gimmicks to see a movie in theaters
by osmosis jones
They just want a great print of the frickin' movie. DOTD fans would flock to see it again on the big screen, they don't need 3D guts flying out at them.
-
My Brainz intersprets the movie into 3D quite well as I'm able to discern Perpective and angle and shit within the format of the Huge letterbox format screen. That being said I really loved Beowulf in 3D as I thought it would be red and green shit but amazingly it's now clear glasses and I think this new 3D is another step further so maybee it will be amazing!? But why this? is it a simple film to convert? are there scenes that look like they'd be improved a lot by the technology or am I missing the bigger picture and this new 3D enhances Everything so It's ALL fucking Brilliant in which case re-do Everything in it and blow my mind all over again!!!MOVIES ARE FUCKING BRILLIANT AINT THEY.COM
-
Dawn Of The Dead still shows the seams of its low budget in film stock, cinematography, lighting and such. Will 3D just magnify these flaws? Granted its fine just as it is. Can we stop strip mining classics just to make some extra bucks??
-
$50,000 - $100,000 per minute. Yikes. Sure DOTD isnt chock of complex images but even if they did the US 139min version (as opposed to the 156min one) absolute bare minimum outlay would be $6,950,000.
Not earthshattering but financially (and that surely can be their only motivation here) is it really worth it for them? -
The new version was better in every conceivable way. Turn THAT one into 3-D and I'll be interested.The original? zzzzzzzzzz
-
Romero doesn't have the rights to Dawn (or Night or Day), so he's not the one trying to get this going. I can't say whether or not he'll get any money (they'll want to market it with George's name on it, not sure if they can do that without paying the man), but I do know this is Richard Rubinstein's gig, not George's. Get your facts straight before sounding like a idiot.
-
in history to be converted to 3D and re-released to theatres. I for one wouldn't mind seeing the likes of Ben Hur or Gone with the Wind reimagined in the third dimension. But does all the razzle-dazzle of the new process really bode well for Hollywood? Or does it hide the dark fact that we may have finally reached the pinnacle of post-modern culture, where everything old IS truly new again? I fear for originality now.
-
just do a William Castle-type deal and have people dressed as zombies in the theater sneak up behind people and scare the bejesus out of them, and maybe throw bloody entrails at opportune moments. That would be fun.
-
But it does show it's lack of budget in later viewings. How many zombies really are completely blue in the face? It kind of makes it less frightening when being stalked by a black zombie in blue face who looks like he's trying really hard not to laugh. Still a classic though.
-
Lucas is not too pleased with this new 3D process. I read that it is taking far longer than expected and is costing an absolute fortune. That being said, I think that Star Wars in 3D will be incredible, imagine the space battles at the end of Jedi....wow....I'm just not holding my breath. I still think that it'll be a few years off yet. As for DOD in 3D...it'll be ok but hardly dynamic. Give us Aliens, Close Encounters or The Thing and I'm there. Hell, even Citizen Kane would blow people's minds and re-introduce it to a new audience.
-
(BTW, one of my favorite old school games) Just as in the '50s when the advent of television forced filmakers to get butts in seats via "gimmicks"...3-D, Vistavision, Cinerama, early stereophonic sound, etc. Now with home theaters nearing film quality, they repeat the gimmicks of the past to once again get butts in seats. See the "new" Journey To Center Of The Earth, which I'm sure has as much to do about Jules Verne than I do, but with "in yer face" 3D effects. ( A 3D Brendon Fraser may be more than I can take)
-
Big screen + 3d, I'd be there. Certainly I'm not the only one.
-
I love me some Dawn but a Creepshow 3D, with all the comic book bits and lurid lighting and compositions, would get my ass out of this seat and into a cinema seat.
-
Actually, I was rather disappointed with the way it turned out. Hopefully, they've improved the tech since then.
-
Once again, AICN is beat to the news by chud.
No, I don't work for them. I read both sites.
They take the lead in breaking stories that are interesting. AICN takes the lead in whiny geeky bitchiness with retarded talkbacks. -
it seems it'll never go away. I can't believe the obese teen girl demographic still shell out for that shit movie.
-
May 19, 2008 12:01:14 PM CDT
Wow, Romero keeps finding ways to make us pay for DOTD again
by trazadone
After a gazzilion VHS and DVD releases Romero must have asked himself, "How can I make even more money on this property"? Big yawn.
-
Another turd into our minds. WHY DO THIS?
Hollywood can't make anything new! @#$%! -
Unless he gets paid for a commentary track or interviews, he doesn't make shit off of another version of DOTD. Just because he wrote and directed it, doesn't mean the movie belongs to him. Richard Rubinstein owns it and has been pimping out the name for years now.
-
And I would love to see the original in theatres, 3-D or not.
-
Or would that be Jaws 3D:3D?
-
I enjoy the original Dawn of the Dead...in fact I own the 3 version set.It is BY NO MEANS a great movie. I see the social commentary...I see what Romero was (and always is) going for...but for my money the original NIGHT is a MUCH scarier and well put together film. Now, that being said, I think DAWN would've been MUCH improved had he kept his original scripted ending intact.
-
Yeah, I know it's impossible! But I read the Dawn script before i saw the movie and the screenplay had Romero's original "downer" ending....never should've changed it.
-
Ugggghhhhh!!!
-
It'd be a great drive-in triple feature. I'm iffy about the 3-D gimmick. I'll be grabbing up "Diary" tomorrow, so I still have to sample 'shaky-cam' zombies before I can contemplate 'reach out and touch someone from the screen' zombies.
-
I actually prefer Snyder's remake as well. I respect Romero for all his vast contributions to the genre but I have mixed feelings when watching much of his work, Creepshow excluded. I'm still interested in Diary of the Dead, which hits DVD tomorrow, but poor word of mouth has me worried on that one.
-
Mavra, I just saw the original on the big screen here in 'Querque last weekend. It was great...once you get past that initial eye-shock of seeing something so obviously old and low-budget, you forget about it completely within five minutes (unless the movie sucks, which this obviously didn't.) There were even people sincerely squealing in surprise at certain scenes. Also, before and after the show, a local video store (Burning Paradise) organized a bunch of geeks into a "Zombie Walk" before and after the flick. Good times, especially when you're drunk.
-
the original has dated terribly but is still a landmark in horror but it just isnt scary anymore
-
That sounds like fun. We have a theater that often shows older films with theme night and a restaurant-sponsored meal ('Godfather' with Olive Garden, etc.). A Romero-themed night would be kick ass! They have a sense of humor. This week, they're showing 'Sweeney Todd' with Fazoli's. Hope they have extra sauce...
-
Things like this are the reason I occasionally wish I'd stayed in L.A. On any given weekend I could drive 15 minutes and see a classic on some big screen somewhere...even the chains had their "Summer Special" nights where they'd show Raiders or Top Gun. Here in ABQ, there's ONE tiny fucking indie theater and it's almost an hour from my house. Gas and beer are cheaper here though, that usually gets me through the week sane.
-
Thats like saying you're enjoying Kurosawa with Chung King.
-
They go for the chains to keep the price lower. It's not high class, but it's a start for a place like this. Romero might get what...Noodles and Co.?
-
awesome news, just wont have to watch it in 3d.
-
I'm down when and where?
-
Word brother, word. The DAWN remake owned my ass when I first saw it (I was stoned at the time, but it really ruined me). That's the film I hold as example of why remaking a film isn't necessarily always a terrible idea. Sometimes you can take the same basic concept of the original, yet construct it completely differently so as to improve upon the idea.
-
It's one of my favorite movies, I enjoy 3-D movies, why would I not enjoy this? I don't think the colorization comparison is quite right because at least right now you can't do 3-D at home so this is just a temporary gimmick for one particular night at the movies and cannot replace the version(s) on DVD that I have bought more than once.
The thing I haven't seen brought up though is that this must be a cut version. DAWN was released unrated. It is possible to release unrated movies in today's market, but I doubt it is possible to release unrated movies to the specific chain theaters that have the right digital projection for this. -
i wear an eye patch.
-
is a better idea than remakig really good movies, like monster squad and revenge of the nerds.
-
i do see the beauty in how good the original is.
-
Damn you to hell!
-
haha! Oh man, thats gonna be great!
-
May 19, 2008 3:25:57 PM CDT
It gets up and kills...the people it kills GET UP AND KILL!!!
by thecomedian
My favorite cheesy movie quote ever.
-
It suuuuuuuuuuuucked. It was almost like you could tell some one that is only passingly familiar with the technology and the voyueristic mood was behind it. hey, i love Romero and NOTLD is still the ONLY movie that truly scares me...but I think he lost it. Land was pretty sad and Diary was better, but still bad.
-
I think Harry or Quint said that after a few months ago, but presented as though the major chains were expecting that. Am I wrong to assume that 3D will ALWAYS simply be a fringe? I mean, I agree with a previous poster in that all real film fans want is a beautiful print and good sounds....everything else is unnecessary.
-
...the original _dawn_ was 16mm, for fook's sake! the advantage of this film getting this treatment, other than to watch wooley go apeshit and a (by now) goofy head explosion, um, comin' at me in WHAT WAS FREAKIN' LOW RESOLUTION IN 1979 would be....what, exactly? virtualizing something that looks fake to begin with strikes me as making two mistakes with one effort. at this rate, why don't they 3D-ize cassavettes' _husbands_ or episodes of _kojak_? i get the feeling only directors of photography will get that gag...
-
period. the end. good lord, what could possibly have been "better" about it, aside from the memorable first ten minutes? more cross-dressing? sarah polley? i'll go with the latter, perhaps, but every single one of you who finds snyder's version superior is wrong/fucked in the head. i guess it's possible it might have looked superior with my head up my ass, but sadly that was not the condition wherein i viewed it -- that's the only way any of you could have come to this risible conclusion.
i'm not really -- oooo, look out now! -- a big fan of his version of _300_, for that matter. mr. miller's original seemed so much more vital and exciting, whereas the film version came off overwrought ("we are undone, i tell you!") and absurd. and poor lynn varley! her lovely, dramatic color work in the comic was transformed via CGI into a film that looked like it took place in andres serrano's "piss christ". i get the feeling only modern art fans will get that gag... -
As long as 3D is cost-prohibitive, it will indeed remain fringe. If you can create a viable non-glasses method of 3D (Spielberg's brought up some process he's invested in for a while now that's still not quite there yet) and then make it relatively inexpensive on a mass scale, you're there. But it will probably be ten times as difficult to integrate into regular moviegoing than digital filming and projection...look how long THAT took to catch on. Now most new theaters have at least one or two digital screens if not more. In the end your final assessment is what it is...a nice print and good sound. That'll do.
-
do zack's one in 3D and im soooo there
-
MCVamp...to further discuss, is the integration of 3D cinema on a grand scale something that you are looking forward to? I only ask because as a film fan, I am curious as to whether this is something I'm missing out on. I do not seek out 3D or IMAX version even when they come along...in fact I think I willfully avoid them. I understand we're talking about an eventual "glasses free" experience, but I still can't help but feel that there's something inherently "wrong" (for lack of a better word) with a push in that direction.Duane Jones...I agree with you. There is NO COMPARISON of the remake to the original. I don't dislike Zack Snyder as much as you seem to...but much like the recent remake of DAY it almost seems like they made a completely separate film with small elements and slapped DAWN on it. Not a noble effort, but I DO think the remake made for a good Zombie movie outside the Romero realm. Of course the action and effects are a VAST improvement over the original. Even Savini has come out with how bad he thought the blood looked.
-
You mean, FoxFire? If that were Firefox, then I'm royally pissed that I missed that verison and saw the one where Eastwood played James Bond (Badly) and stole a Soviet plane. Cool arcade game though.
-
Look, im totally in the minority here, and 1 man can't halt progress and innovation - however, this bums me out. My left eye has been pretty shit since birth, and as a result this 3d shit just doesn't work for me.
Ah well, at least i've got Dawn on BluRay. -
"the remake blew the original out of the water" why, cuz zach had more money for better effects and more blood???? the original dawn was commentary on america's addiction to mass consumption, cloaked in a zombie movie...zach's movie just happened to be filmed in a mall set...there was no purpose, there was no reasoning...it was a straight zombie action flick, with some of the best scenes borrowed from other movies...but all you mindless sheep care about is fast moving zombies and lots of blood and gore...christ...you kids sicken me...michael bay has a career cuz you fucks love to eat shit and ask for seconds...you dont care is there is a story, you dont care for subtext...you just want cool explosions and cgi you cant see on your xbox...fuck you all
-
I saw this in a theater in the same freakin mall it was shot in (Monroeville, outside Pittsburgh). I must admit it was pretty surreal to exit the theater right back in the mall, only to be bumped by people mindlessly walking through the mall. Quite disconcerting.
-
Sure its one thing to take a space ship on a star field and make it look 3-D but zombies walking slow in a mall won't work. SR in IMAX 3-D was a awful mess and proves you can't just take any old movie and make it 3-D. Nightmare worked because it "looked 3-D" to begin with. Why taint what AVATAR is doing with the 3-D market by putting out these half-ass money grabs.
-
Don't know if the misses is, though.
-
How about you come up with a new, original idea and film it in 3D? Don't finance it because "wow that would look awesome flying out of the screen" finance it because it would be better in 3D.
-
The best of the bunch in 3d. Count me in.
-
THAT would be sweet!
-
I have seen the follwing in the theaters, Spooks(3 Stooges), Dial M for Murder, Jaws 3D, Friday the 13th part 3. Comin at Ya, House of Wax,,Captain EO, Muppets. Nightmare on Elm part?3... etc etc etc. Vern you are right about unrated vs a "R" rating... When they are just starting the process of converting to 3-D.... wouldn't T-2 be a better choice to convert to 3-D? If I wanted to make money on 3-D... I'd pick a blockbuster movie with special effects and an outstanding film print. With Camerons camera angles and motion,, damn !!!!!!certain that T-2 would break the box office bank again. Love, Dawn of the Dead,, saw it in the theaters when I was 15,,,,, not a money making choice.
-
THE SCREEN COMES ALIVE IN. STEREOVISION 3D
The Unpublishable Novel Is Now America's Most Controversial Film!
Now At Last On The Wide-Screen--The Most Talked About Girls In America--The One, The Only...
The Stewardesses
Ahh you smutpeddler!!!!!!!
-
Maybe I'm just living in the past, but to me Romero's original holy trilogy is absolutely perfect. I can't wait for this. I've said it before and I'll say it again, if George Romero's Dead films were six year old boys, I'd be in jail for how much I love them. This is the one instance where I freely admit to being a blind fanboy.
-
trust me. i saw beowulf in 3D (digital realD theater) and it was amazing. no blue and red or green and red glasses. just clear glasses. everything is so layered. everything pops. its like a religious experience. the experience. not the movie. beowulf was ok, but far better in 3D.
i think its funny how people fight about the original dawn vs the remake dawn. two totally different movies, two totally different ways to rock. and dont bash the old one because of its effects, they were increadible for the time. bash movies that use cgi every 5 seconds. bad cgi that is.... -
The plan for Tuesday is to get a little work done in the morning, go for a jog in the afternoon, then I'll be renting Diary of the Dead and making some home-made french fries to enjoy along with it. I expect it shall be quite enjoyable!
-
LEELA: Mine's not working...!
-
Seriously.Movies should stay in 2D. Forever and always. Everything else is fucking child's play and worthless wannabe-eye-candy about which I don't give a flying fuck. Period.
-
..the opening sequence of "Day of the Dead"...(everything up to the opening title)
-
Seriously, why can't some of you see that? Liking one doesn't mean you must hate the other. I love them both and own them on DVD. I saw them both in the theaters on release and would love to see them both again in 3D. Yeah, Romero's got a message in his movies, we get it bravo. It doesn't mean you have to marry the fucking thing and shit on it's remake whenever it's mentioned.
-
May 20, 2008 4:03:03 AM CDT
mariachi madness...suck mi huge white verga, you fuckin poser
by bacci40
why dont you tell the whole story...of how you went to the drive in with your wannabe gf, hoping that a horror film would send her into your arms and you would get a cheap thrill...but then, she was the one transfixed as to what was going on, on the screen, so you were (once again) forced to go home and wack off in the bathroom...cuz if you take away the bigger budget, the better effects and the professional actors...there is nothing better in the remake...im sorry, but gross out scenes made only for the gross out factor dont excite me...its like kids today see the original halloween and say...hey that was crap...where's the blood, where's the gore...where's the torture porn scene, why doesnt jamie lee take her top off? fuck you all...thats the whole point...that movie didnt need that shit to scare you...and in romero's classic zombie movies, the horror wasnt coming from the gross out scenes, it was coming from the audiences realization of the human condition...in night, that was about the destruction of the nuclear family, racism, and the end of the ozzie and harriet generation...in dawn, it was the recognition that we didnt need some outside entity to zombify us...we did it to ourselves, becoming zombified consumers, with day it was the warning about the miltary industrial complex...and ya, what a hack romero is...which is why filmmakers continue to recapture the magic he found back with a bunch of amateur actors and cheap film stock...and none of them have done it yet...
-
Zombie Baby- unfuckingforgivabe
-
'just do a William Castle-type deal and have people dressed as zombies in the theater sneak up behind people and scare the bejesus out of them, and maybe throw bloody entrails at opportune moments'. That sir is a work of genius, i would rather attend some sort of fucked up 'Rocky Horror picture show zombie jumping out and lobbing guts and shit audince particiption event' than this. Why DOTD? rahter see CE3K 3D upped myself
-
where people watch it sitting on inner-tubes in the ocean and every so often someone pulls them under the water. The Descent cave was good as well.
-
These Romero flicks were sorta cool in a geeky kid kinda way when they were first released. Now when I see these I'm thinking that I just woke up with a huge hangover and there's no asprin to be had. Even more liquor doesn't stop the pain. The only thing worse than Romero's zombie flicks is the fact that the flicks themselves seem impossible to kill. It's like one of those self recursive acronyms in that the zombie film has become the zombie. It just won't die.
-
The zombies in the original had personality, at least as much as a mute walking corpse can have. So he didn 't spend a fortune on effects, but how many of you remember the Krishna, the nurse, etc.? The remake had scarier, faster zombies with better makeup, but the original zombies could leave an impression deeper than a gaping bite wound.
-
Thanks for the interaction…long time reader… first time writer. The only audience participation we have had recently has been a twenty minute argument with an obese ‘Jabba the Hut’ type mother fucker, who after eating his own body weight in M&Ms, then mashed a number his mobile with his paw and proceeded to yell into it the whole plot of Iron Man at the top of his voice. (You know the type he’s seen the film more times than he has seen his feet in the last five years and just has to tell his other fat knacker of a pal, who can’t squeeze his girth out of the front door to come to the movie, what’s happening on the screen)
His argument that he’ has paid good money to see the film and can do what he wants’just wound me up like a cheap Japanese watch. And the cherry on the cake was hearing the dulcet tones of ‘SHUT YOUR FUCKING MOUTH’ screamed at him and then realising those words had sprung from the lips of your own daughter. Getting pulled under water whilst watching Jaws seems somehow to be a lot more fun than this.
-
Drive me mad, I thank the lord I live in Britain and censorship is such that we don't get Children in films I want to go to. I really pity Americans sometimes.
-
I can totally see it working in 3D.
But on the other hand... why do we need to see a movie 3Dlized (nightmare before christmas, starwars, DotD) or Director's Cutted (Alien, Starwars again, blade runner) in order to bring them back to the movie theaters? They're classics and just seeing them on the big screen with an audience is enough.
Like, how would a shorter version of Reservoir Dogs made into 3D be better for instance? Just bring back the classics the way they were. -
Why do they keep trying to retrofit films that were never intended for 3D?
-
2 Things:
1.) Someone said the Dead REMAKE is "Better!" wow. yikes. yeesh. I like the remake - and I've found almost NOBODY in the horror world that even likes it - let alone says it is "better." It's good - but not better. Not nearly as frightening as the original. The relationships between the characters in the original are what made it scary. The remake has none of that - it's very different (but still good..just not better.)
2.) Why are you guys complaining about it being remade in 3-D? I don't care if they put it in black & white with a French over-dub - it's still the original Dawn of the Dead in the THEATER again. -
Now it can be overrated in an extra dimension!!
-
But Romero's is a perfect 10, while snyders is an 8. different movies but the remake was one of the best zombie films I have ever seen anyone beside Romero or fulci make.
-
At least in Japan, where they're testing it. And...you don't need any special glasses. We'll probably get it in the states in ten years.
-
This is one trend that wouldn't bother me.In my opinion,Both versions of D.O.T.D. are top notch in their own way.I own the original ultimate version so I don't care what they do,I'd go to the cinema and watch it in 3-D just for the hell of it.Go all the way and CGI the personality zombies :0
-
Cumming soon to a cinema near you.
-
in 3-D. "It gonna be a scary one, kids! Aaaaooohhhh!"
Readers Talkback
User Login
Top Talkbacks
- Whitney Houston 1963 - 2012 -- 439 total posts 159 posts
- WTF HOLLYWOOD: SOLARBABIES -- 144 total posts 142 posts
- Herc’s Seen Tonight’s Return Of THE WALKING DEAD!! Discuss Also DOWNTON ABBEY, FEAR FACTOR, PAN AM, ONCE, SIMPSONS, DYNAMITE, LUCK, SHAMELESS, BAIT CAR, THE GRAMMYS And More!! Sunday Is Sweeps Day 11!! -- 155 total posts 140 posts
- Avid Comic Reader Hercules Does Battle With Tedium During Kevin Smith’s COMIC BOOK MEN! -- 55 total posts 45 posts
- There's a STAR TREK video game that is going to lead into JJ's STAR TREK 2 apparently... -- 196 total posts 45 posts
- I am The Behind the Scenes Pics of the Day! No, I’m the Behind the Scenes Pic of the Day! -- 35 total posts 35 posts
- If the Behind the Scenes Pics of the Day drops her pen, pick it up, but don’t look at her legs or else it will be on your record. -- 60 total posts 34 posts
- New JUDGE DREDD post production footage pops up -- 127 total posts 32 posts
- To Commemorate The 3D Release Of STAR WARS EPISODE I: THE PHANTOM MENACE, George Lucas Wants You To Know...Greedo Shoots First!! -- 513 total posts 29 posts
- The Sensorties Revisit The Friday Docback (And Still Smell)!! DOCTOR WHO Story #7 Again, The Coming Of Season/Series 7, And More!! -- 118 total posts 27 posts