Logo

Cool News

Has Fox Castrated Or Cured Vin's BABYLON AD??

Published at:  Apr 09, 2008 9:34:01 AM CDT


Merrick here...



This should've been posted yesterday, but I got distracted when I learned my kitchen sink had been leaking & water had oozed under the floorboards of my place. The wood floor in my hovel was oozing water every time I stepped on it...liquid blobbed up between the seams like blood from a wound that just had a salty scab picked off of it.

Half my house is now shrink wrapped and condomized...looks like Elliot's home at the end of E.T. There are these big fans...the size of small refrigerators...which are pushing air through the entire house in an effort to dry it out, creating strange vacuums and pressure changes through the structure of my place (is this the world's biggest blow job?)

So, sorry this one's late.

Twitch has an interesting article about shenanigans swirling around Vin Diesel's forthcoming Sci Fi thriller BABYLON AD. In short, there's been talk for some time that two distinct versions of the film would exist: a longer European cut, and a more ADD friendly American cut. This differential isn't altogether uncommon, but it usually isn't too extreme. You know, maybe five, ten, or fifteen minutes difference in running time...if that.

Such is not the case with BABYLON AD - and Twitch has the numbers. One cut of the film is said to clock in at 2hrs and 40 minutes (160 minutes). This is the director's intended iteration of the project, which was supposed to be released in mainland Europe. The second version of the film will run 90 minutes when released in many other parts of the world. This is courtesy of the film's global distributor, Fox.


Now, for all I know, the film is legitimately long or boring or top-heavy - losing 70 minutes might only help the thing. Still, that's a lot of story to lose...a lot of character moments that'll go unseen...a lot of atmosphere that won't be experienced. It's inconceivable abolishing so much time won't affect the end product adversely. If this were being done by any company but Fox, I'd be a little less concerned (but still worried). However, they haven't shown stellar awareness or common sense of late (see our review of their DAY THE EARTH STOOD STILL remake HERE), so...

You can find Twitch's article...

HERE!!!











    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 9:20:43 AM CDT

    First?

    by unuseddraft

    Seriously?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 9:22:15 AM CDT

    160min version for the extended dvd release

    by bouncy x

  • Apr 09, 2008 9:23:03 AM CDT

    so there's no trailer yet?

    by datascream

    I'm kinda wanting to see what the movie looks like.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 9:23:08 AM CDT

    Now..

    by unuseddraft

    I wish they had trimmed 70 minutes out of xXx.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 9:24:43 AM CDT

    I'm sure the cats destroyed your kitchen sink.

    by derlanghaarige

    Don't fuck with pussy! Uhm...you know what I mean!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 9:26:36 AM CDT

    Any other company but Fox?!?!?!

    by filmcoyote

    You're not seriously suggesting you'd entrust Warner Bros? The company that brought you Exorcist: The Beginning and The Invasion? Surely Fox is far more reliable than the "occasionally we screw up and a good film mnakes it out" Warner Bros!?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 9:29:04 AM CDT

    a lot of atmosphere?

    by arcadiands

    You're realize you're talking about Vin Diesel, right?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 9:33:11 AM CDT

    DerLanghaarige

    by merrick

    Cats fear these gigantic fans, which makes the whole experience quite funny.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 9:37:02 AM CDT

    looks like i'll be waiting on the dvd for this one.

    by bmacsmith

    not paying full price to see half a movie in the theater

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 9:48:52 AM CDT

    I will not be seeing this or The Dark Knight.

    by batman begins sucks ass

  • Apr 09, 2008 9:59:59 AM CDT

    Babylon AD?

    by bobo_vision

    Thats what she said.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 10:15:36 AM CDT

    Not sure I'd be blaming studios for this

    by jackrabbitslim

    There's been reports all over the Net that Diesel and director Kassowitz or whatever went at it hammer and tongs over this one. Troubled production frequently = shitty movie. But not always.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 10:30:47 AM CDT

    Well...

    by silentp

    If it somehow gets really good reviews, then I'll see it in theatres. If it doesn't, I'll wait and see if the inevitable director's cut dvd gets good reviews, and then rent that. Otherwise, I just won't see it. It's a Vin Diesel movie... I don't hate him, but I'm not exactly dying to see it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 10:32:32 AM CDT

    Fox + Diesel + Kassovitz = Programmed disaster

    by spencertrilby

    A diva leading man, an asshole director and the lousiest studio around. How surprising...

    Can't wait to see the longer cut though. Looks interesting.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 10:40:50 AM CDT

    I think they should do this all the time....

    by flickapoo

    ...this way both the studio/marketing folks and the director are happy...and the longer artistic (or whatever) version will exist for those who want to see it. Worked great for Lord of the Rings...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 11:00:51 AM CDT

    This is going to be awesome!

    by series7

    Man I love FOX! They are totally perfect when it comes to editing movies. Like remember how awesome PG-13 Die Hard was last year? Didn't have to hear any of those poopie words like fuck. And that scene where you can totally tell that whatever MAC guy and Bruce are talking about is no where near what my gentle ears are hearing! I hope FOX makes a game out of with this movie, like movie stars out with Disel having a beard, next scene NO BEARD! THEN THEN! BEARD AGAIN! Like Maximus disappearing dog in Gladiator!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 11:01:44 AM CDT

    Interesting but not necessarily bad

    by freakemovie

    Cutting out a full half of the movie, you're really just getting two completely different films. You'd just have to judge them completely separate from each other. It's an interesting prospect.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 11:02:05 AM CDT

    Poor Vin

    by skycrapper

    He hasn't done a decent movie since Pitch Black (if you count that, I don't count Point Break in Cars). This doesn't bode well.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 11:15:11 AM CDT

    Wow, that's like, a lot of movie cut

    by godzillasushi

    Like, a whole lot. Fox is sly like a fox. Vin is alright. I don't really care. But man, they cut half the movie. Crazy. Die Hard....geeze, what's wrong with them? $$$? $$$$$? Hmmmm...but this one doesn't look very promising $$$$$$.....want to play a funny joke on your younger friends? Force them to watch 2001 with the door locked. They will go insane. It's funny. 70 minutes? Really?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 11:18:39 AM CDT

    well shit

    by gungan slayer

    thanks Fox, just thanks. you know, not all american movie goers are stupid, ADD retards who can't stand watching a movie for 2+ hours. Fox will release this multiple times on DVD in the US. First, the lame ass 90 min theater version. Then, months later, a new Special Extended Edition DVD release, with 30 mins of extra footage! Then, a year or so later, the DIRECTOR'S CUT DVD SPECIAL EDITION 3 Disc Set----THE WAY THE DIRECTOR WANTED YOU TO SEE IT!!!!!!! yay!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 11:36:27 AM CDT

    Of course Fox is fucking up the film

    by neo zeed

    Die Hard 4, AVP 1 & 2, Hitman. They're not satisfied until a movie is dumbed down and nuetered.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 11:37:40 AM CDT

    the edit will be for the better, provided

    by vaudeville villain

    they're cutting out each instance vin appears on screen.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 11:45:00 AM CDT

    Full version of The Avengers was never released

    by rolnikov

    I've always been disappointed that the full version of The Avengers has never been released. That was the last big film I remember to have such a huge chunk cut out at the last minute. It wasn't a great movie, but it had moments I liked, and I'd like to see if the original version was any better.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 12:29:15 PM CDT

    If it's got Michelle Yeo I'm in.

    by crichtonastronut

    She's just too cool.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 12:45:07 PM CDT

    70min is bloody brutal. That's almost a tenth

    by crichtonastronut

    of how long Eyes Wide Shut feels, which BTW could've and should've lost 70 min, at least, how many driving on the bridge shots did that movie really need.

    But honestly, 70 minutes, off of 2 hours and forty, in a SciFi thriller, how top heavy could it have been. It's like bunch of people walking. Scene changes still walking, half of them are dead on the floor covered in blood. Role credits.

    Fox cut of Ratotoui. Rat jumps in resturaunt, previously undseen food critique smiles. Role credsits.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 2:09:29 PM CDT

    Talk of recut = bad movie already

    by stamper

    It's going to suck. Kassovitz is overrated, and big headed, he is just a kid into a candy store of the movie industry.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 2:27:59 PM CDT

    Crichton, it's "Yeoh" yo.

    by tylerzero

  • Apr 09, 2008 2:47:14 PM CDT

    Lucky for me...

    by dantes2005

    I live in Europe :p

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 2:48:30 PM CDT

    FOX chopped up HITMAN too.

    by umaga

    Why are they always fucking up movies I want to see? I enjoyed HITMAN as a popcorn flick, but the script was really good and scenes that were actually filmed were removed. They even added in that terrible agent sword fight. The alternative to that is on the DVD. And they fucking cut 47 killing the dude at the start of the movie in the hospital. FUCK FOX.

    Reply to Talkback

  • have all the attention span of your average Labrador Retriever.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 3:06:58 PM CDT

    I'm Downloading this...

    by greenleaf1

    ...when it comes out, so I can watch the longer version instead of some bastardized 90 minute cut. Vin Diesel is a pretty good actor and this sounds like it could be along the lines of Children of Men. I'd like to see the long version of this...hopefully it will be made available at some point in the U.S.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 3:33:42 PM CDT

    but on the other hand

    by thehumanbeingandfish

    I'm actually one of those (apparently rare) individuals who, *enjoys* watching different versions of a movie I like. So, this could, potentially, be good news for folks like me.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 4:08:27 PM CDT

    The Saint with Val Kilmer was butchered too

    by spencertrilby

    I doubt the original cut was a masterpiece, but it could've been good if the didn't cut it to pieces and reshot the ending.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 5:32:51 PM CDT

    Why not just cut ALL of the film...

    by biggusdickus

    ...and show the ads? Money and product placement is all these whores care about anyway.
    Seriously though, we're seeing more and more of this. Release a cinema cut, then a vanilla DVD and then a 'special edition' Get the same mugs to shell out three times for the same product. Yeah, Lucas, talking to you, monkeyboy!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 5:55:41 PM CDT

    Nosferatu Jones...

    by pikagreg

    Babylon AD was the first cd i ever bought. Their biggest hit was a song called "so savage the heart." freaking sweet.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 6:10:44 PM CDT

    Diesel

    by jsm1978

    I actually like the guy. He's not the greatest actor ever, but he's not horrible. The directors cut or whatever of The Chronicles of Riddick was much better than the theatrical cut.
    That being said, how can you possibly chop 70 minutes out of a movie without absolutely killing the film? It doesn't seem possible.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 6:18:27 PM CDT

    "How can you cut 70 minutes w/out killing film"

    by jackrabbitslim

    I give you Heaven's Gate

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 6:45:04 PM CDT

    We can only hope for "Castrated"

    by andre the frog

    Sing higher, Vin Darling.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 7:23:30 PM CDT

    You can't make your passion projects

    by the winged doucheman

    Until you make enough box office busting tentpoles. Vin is in the red in that respect. Clooney owes at least 3 tent poles for the amount of personal films he's done.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 7:38:57 PM CDT

    I'm hoping for another Pitch Black

    by kovac

    Vin Diesel showed some promise in that film and I think that in the right role he could really shine.

    And you can't go wrong with Hans Zimmer.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 8:22:16 PM CDT

    Did they not learn from Leone?

    by doodler

    Did they not learn from chopping up Once Upon a Time in America?

    Did they not realize that the Pirates movies were super-long but still made a shit-ton of cash?



    i can understand not wanting to release an action movie of this length (i assume it's an action movie), but 70min? I assume they're deleting an entire (formerly major) subplot that would somehow enrich the story but isn't necessary.


    it'll be interesting to see if the remaining 90min sizzles from end to end or is just 2-3 major action setpieces stuck between (now-nonsensical) "plot"....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 8:52:21 PM CDT

    what the hell

    by damnkenyans

    are they thinking? 70 minutes - that's almost a film unto itself.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 9:47:21 PM CDT

    That IS an entire movie

    by chitownsbest

    It's called Cloverfield. Too bad they couldn't have cut 70 minutes from that movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 9:51:46 PM CDT

    Babylon 5 AD

    by grammaton cleric binks

    Vin Diesel as a badass Minbari ranger.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 10:09:31 PM CDT

    Movies are like free software downloads: just lures.

    by kabong

    A photo editing application, for example, that does not have much functionality until you surrender to the prodding and download the full not-free app.

    Theatrical releases are marketing for the six-months-later DVD release, which is the real movie.

    In the 70 minutes (70!) of extra "restored" director's-cut material on the DVD will be all the sex and violence or other mature-oriented content that the theatrical-version can't have because the under-18 crowd is what exhibitors chase.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 11:56:23 PM CDT

    FOX is so goddamn stupid...

    by poeticwarriorii

    it will collapse in on itself with utter ineptitude. how you can have something like FF in your lineup and totally cock that fucker all to hell is a mystery but those tools over there managed to do a damn nice job of it. Oh well the more shit these fucking morons put out the quicker they'll all be fucking fired. Fuck'em.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 10, 2008 1:26:30 AM CDT

    Hitman is not a movie

    by stamper

    Who cares it would still be bad clocking in at 4mn, and make as much sense as of right now.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 10, 2008 1:58:42 AM CDT

    ALERT Merrick got the info totally wrong ! FALSE INFO !

    by stamper

    The french sites are currently buzzing up about this news. Merrick got it WRONG ! The 2H40 running time was a JOKE told by Kassovitz to make fun of the theaters owners, FACT ! he said the movie would be 2H40 with only two showings a day to scare them a bit, as a JOKE ! The movie is actually, and this is TOLD BY KASSOVITZ HIMSELF WITNESSED LIVE 1H40 with the US cut only missing about 10 mn. AICN PLEASE CORRECT THIS NEWS ! CHECK YOUR SOURCES !

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 10, 2008 2:29:59 AM CDT

    Hmm...

    by cobbio

    A description of "Babylon AD" (from imdb.com): "Veteran-turned-mercenary Thoorop takes the high-risk job of escorting a woman from Russia to China. Little does he know that she is host to an organism that a cult wants to harvest in order to produce a genetically modified Messiah."
    Not a bad dystopian science fiction premise, I think, but Kassovitz is going to have to pull it together after the wildly unfocused "Gothika." That movie was all visuals, no story. I hope "Babylon AD" is at least single-serving watchable.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 10, 2008 4:49:37 AM CDT

    Gotham_night

    by biggusdickus

    I said 'shell out', not 'sell out'. I was referring to the way he keeps releasing tweaked versions of Star Wars to idiots who will buy them. Of course the man doesn't have product placement in his movies - unlike his old mate Spielberg, whose 'Bore of the Worlds' was one long ad for Ford, Mazda, Motorola, Jeep, Nokia, Sony, Coca-Cola, Motorola, Omega etc, etc. No wonder Big Steve is so rich. He never has to buy anything with all those corporate freebies...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 10, 2008 4:54:17 AM CDT

    eh

    by mc-909

    Could they be splitting it into two movies maybe?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 10, 2008 5:25:23 AM CDT

    Who cares about this when AVATAR...

    by motoko kusanagi

    ... is fucking our eyeballs in 2009?Oh, and Mr. "frg10", I second your opinion about those fracking annyoing personal intros - they just suck.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 10, 2008 6:18:57 AM CDT

    AGAIN THIS INFO IS FALSE IT WAS A JOKE FROM KASSOVITZ

    by stamper

    KASSOVITZ MADE IT CLEAR IT WAS A JOKE, THE ACTUAL RUNNING TIME OF THE FILM IS 1H45 WITH THE CREDITS INCLUDED THE US CUT ONLY MISSES ABOUT 10MNS AICN IS NOW SPREADING FAKE NEWS AND LIES ALL OVER THE WEB, THE STANDART IS GOING DOWN. IF HARRY BOTHERED TO CHECK, HE WOULD CALL KASSOVITZ WHO WOULD CONFIRM THIS NEWS IS WRONG.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 10, 2008 6:24:59 AM CDT

    BABYLON ADD

    by napoleon park

    Seriously, no product placements in the Star Wars movies? All of them after Empire - and maybe the Yoda scenes from that one two - were ads for the action figures. People talk about '80s cartoons like Transformers and Guy Joe neing 30 minute commercials for the toys and a throwback to the early '60s when saturday morning cartoons starred cereal company mascots, but the Star Wars movies were totally about selling product. What did you think Ewoks were, Lucas's version of Hobbits? They were half Gremlin half teddy bears shoved in to replace the Wookies because they thought they'd sell better.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 10, 2008 7:54:11 AM CDT

    ADD Friendly American Cut?

    by beyondstatic

    Brilliant Comment!
    Right on!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 10, 2008 8:19:56 AM CDT

    Napoleon Park

    by biggusdickus

    Hadn't thought of that aspect.
    You are, of course, spot-on. All those new aliens popping up with each installment - kerching! - more action figures for the sheep to collect!
    Baa!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 10, 2008 9:12:16 AM CDT

    This year's Little Miss Southland Tales

    by catnip_thieves

    That headline was a JOKE. I told it to French theater owners a JOKE. The length of the JOKE has always been 1h 45m but I trimmed 10m off the JOKE for US AUDIENCES. The 10m trimmed are little more than me saying "Bon appetite!" in a funny accent.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 10, 2008 11:08:07 AM CDT

    i dont know

    by snapple_ladys_lazy_eye

    how the fuck I keep giving Diesel a pass for the work he did in the Riddick movies. for some reason they resonated with me. I should probably get a lobotomy.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 10, 2008 12:31:11 PM CDT

    Rolnikov - The Avengers

    by sprout

    I also enjoyed The Avengers, I've been dying to see an extended cut of the film since '98! http://tinyurl.com/2b3o3t

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 10, 2008 1:18:34 PM CDT

    Personal Problems

    by mattmanreturns

    We all have problems in our lives. I dunno about you, but I still make it to work. You couldn't take two seconds to write an article on the internet? You guys suck. I'm sick of hearing about your personal crap. Do your jobs. Jesus.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 10, 2008 6:51:16 PM CDT

    twitch update

    by uva

    Thanks again to regular reader Mary for updated information on this. The stated hundred and sixty minute run time came from statements made by star Michelle Yeoh a few months back. More recently Kassovitz has been quoted saying that his version of the film runs and hour and forty five minutes, for a total one hundred and five minute run time. Whether Yeoh had her details wrong or Kassovitz did some cutting of his own in the mean time is not clear but if this time is correct then the Fox version trims only fifteen minutes from the KAssovitz cut rather than seventy, which is still significant but not on the same scale.

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback