Logo

Cool News

The First Teaser of ICE AGE: RISE OF THE DINOSAURS - in Glorious HD Quicktime!!!

Published at:  Apr 08, 2008 1:21:00 AM CDT

Hey folks, Harry here... I've been a huge fan of the initial teaser trailers for the ICE AGE films... Which as shorts - have been vastly superior and successful to the feature films that they advertise. I also tend to prefer the ICE AGE films to the SHREK movies... but I'm still not in love with them. Now we have a new Teaser trailer in HD QUICKTIME - and I was very excited... because well - all the first teasers have been amazing... till this one. This one falls flat to me. It just is nowhere near as funny as the previous two. Then there's the wildly bugnuts concept of Dinosaurs in the ICE AGE... but ya know what - if I'm asking for historical accuracy - I'm just an asshole... so I suppose I'm completely cool with this development. And the dinosaur reminds me of the stop-motion dinosaur character from THE PUPPETTOON MOVIE. Right? Here - you check it out...






Click here for the latest ICE AGE!



    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 1:24:21 AM CDT

    I thought that...

    by calastir

    ...Dinosaurs were extinct looong BEFORE the Ice Age.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 1:29:02 AM CDT

    Hey!

    by troutmaskreplicant

    So much shit today and still no mention of the trouble brewing around Valkyrie and Trick R Treat. With all the hate surrounding Superman Returns at least it would be a lively talkback.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 1:35:46 AM CDT

    ok..

    by bob oblaw

    this might be good..
    or at least my nephews will think so..

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 1:37:18 AM CDT

    no subject

    by ollerom

    Yea and there were humans in the first movie so they have threw history right out of the window with this one. But who cares I love blue sky studios animation work so I am willing to look past that. Maybe they are going with the lost world concept since he fell through the ice to a hidden jungle underneath. I guess we will have to wait and see.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 1:48:33 AM CDT

    DAWN OF THE DINOSAURS!!!!!

    by topdolla69

  • Apr 08, 2008 2:09:27 AM CDT

    look to the sky

    by yeuxdesoir

    its pretty much a cavern once he falls.

    it's a lot like what ray liotta said in Thank You for Smoking. Just invent a work around and call it good.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 2:20:14 AM CDT

    Calastir ... I thought that...

    by mr cairo

    yes your right they were extinct but in the first film we see a T-rex frozen in ice in the second film 2 creatures frozen in ice are unfrozen and attack the group so its not a stretch to go from there with these films ... Personally i like them although the animation on the first is already looking a bit ropey

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 2:46:23 AM CDT

    prequel?

    by jubba

    maybe it takes place before the other 2 films? is the voice cast the same?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 2:54:13 AM CDT

    not playable in this area

    by rubbiboy

    "we are sorry... the content you are trying to play is noit available in your area"

    WTF ???

    baaaaaaad marketing... this movie already died for me if they dont let me watch the teaser...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 3:54:36 AM CDT

    The first one was boring

    by cuervojones

    The squirrel is cool, but come on...three movies?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 4:23:58 AM CDT

    Ice Age: Dinosaurs have been Dead for...

    by buck_turgidson

    ...HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF YEARS. One more step in the dumbing down of America

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 4:31:10 AM CDT

    No Time For Nuts.

    by boba fat

    The short on the Ice Age 2 DVD is great. A time traveling Scrat would have made a cool third movie. But dinosaurs dying out before the ice age? Next you'll be telling me that mammoths couldn't talk.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 4:50:11 AM CDT

    But isn't it

    by epleterte

    a sort of, falling down to a lost world, sort of thing? Where the dinos have survived the ages etc etc...

    Because if it isn't, then FUCK EM, for mixing up ALOT of years of earth history.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 5:09:04 AM CDT

    Jesus Christ

    by superjim

    It's a cartoon....for children. Don't fret about Earth's history. I'm pretty sure the kids will be able to distinguish that it is removed from reality. If not, then they deserve to get the piss taken out of them in school 'cos their parents are hicks. No kid ever felt like a twat in class for declaring that Woolly Mammoths could talk as they seen one do it on Ice Age:The Meltown.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 5:52:57 AM CDT

    Ice Age > Shrek ?

    by pearlanddean

    Harry, you can't be serious. Although the dubbed voices of Jonathon Ross and Kate Thornton (replacing Larry King and Joan Rivers respectively) did kind of spoil the UK version of Shrek 2.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 5:54:40 AM CDT

    Oh fur cryin' out loud !

    by thecap

    ICE AGE movies are NOT FUNNY. NOT, repeat - NOT FUNNY> No. NO ! N-O-T FUNNY. Horribly NOT funny. Pitiful wasted Pixar wannabes but never, ever will-be's. Ice Age 3 - NOT NOT NOT FUNNY ... for a thrid time. That is all.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 5:56:12 AM CDT

    Cliche

    by dreamfasting

    Dinosaurs? Dinosaurs?! *drop-kicks the franchise*

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 6:07:34 AM CDT

    Well I liked it...

    by biggusdickus

    ...and more to the point, my five-uear-old daughter liked it too. Surely the whole point of films like this is to take the kids along and watch THEM getting a kick out of it while being occasionally amused yourself. Job done, I'd say...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 6:21:13 AM CDT

    Well said Bigdick........

    by dirtywookie

    It's for the kids, my 3 year old loves 'em, so who gives a rats arse if they are historically incorrect..really, who gives a shit? Some of you guys really need a reality check. Don't be so fucking serious all the time.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 6:34:23 AM CDT

    I think this film was produced by the Christian Right.

    by rbatty024

    That's the only reason I can think of for such scientific inaccuracy.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 6:42:19 AM CDT

    I thought the first movie was great...

    by yeti

    The second one, not so much. However, this "looks" like itcould have potential. Although didn't they square off against a pair of Mesasoic Sea Creatures in the second one?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 6:43:55 AM CDT

    Do Not Want

    by regicidal_maniac

    This is stupid. No, I'm not asking for scientific accuracy but fuck man. Haven't there been enough CGI dino films? What about a proto-human film? Imagine a cross between the opening of 2001 and Quest For Fire, but funny and NOT unintentionally funny like 10,000BC and NOT set in modern day California.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 7:04:16 AM CDT

    As scientifically plausable as the Flintstones

    by grampageezer

    All these posters here are panning this "cartoon" because isn't scientifically accurate?
    The same posters who can't wait to see a guy in an iron suit soar past jets, and a red guy from hell battling monsters, or another guy swinging from roof to roof by shooting spiderwebs?
    These are people that expect realism?? As for myself, I'm looking forward to see what direction they're planning to take Skrat and the rest of the gang in next year.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 7:12:23 AM CDT

    Or 10,000BC!

    by filmfunk

    How can you not like the stunning CGrama that is IceAge!? not quite as 100% sharp as Pixar but not far off.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 7:13:19 AM CDT

    They could have made this more realistic. . .

    by nice marmot

    . . . by featuring the Wooly T-Rex from Scooby-Doo. And is this franchise straight to video yet? Like the new Land Before Time?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 7:33:28 AM CDT

    What, are they going with the Creation Museum...

    by kid z

    ...version of prehistory? Earth only 6000 years old and humans used dinos for transportation. (Odd that the christer version of prehistory is so f***in' similar to The Flintstones...)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 7:40:06 AM CDT

    Grampageezer...

    by rbatty024

    There are two reasons why Ice Age 3 isn't getting any slack.

    First, the first two weren't that good. If they were I think the scientific implausibility would be more easily accepted.

    Second, there are people who are actually attempting to teach that all animals were on Earth at once. The image of a Woolly Mammoth and a Dinosaur side by side feeds into these fantasies. Imagine if someone was claiming that The Flinstones should be taught in school as scientific fact. Wouldn't that make that piss you off just a little?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 7:40:31 AM CDT

    Ain't It Old News

    by grammaton cleric binks

    The trailer was shown before Horton Hears a Who! As was a new extended WALL-E trailer. Granted Horton was a kid's movie, but since this site has done reviews of Grinch and Cat in the Hat I'm sure, someone should have reviewed Horton to compare it to the other two. As it was all CGI, and stayed true to Seuss it was the best of the three.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 7:58:02 AM CDT

    Ice Age 1

    by bizarrojerry

    The first Ice Age was mildly amusing. The second was sorta bland and mediocre. A third film does not bode well. I didn't realize it was popular enough for one. But I guess money's money, huh?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 8:10:25 AM CDT

    The words Ice Age itself means Fall of the Dinosaurs...

    by bean_

    I can not watch a movie where not even the title is accurate! Give me a break!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 8:10:54 AM CDT

    There's something very depressing about the Ice Age movies

    by the gospel according to bastardface

    Maybe it's the fact you know they're ALL DOOMED. And nothing matters because they are all going to die soon. Also they're pretty boring.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 8:17:01 AM CDT

    It Is What It Is

    by toxicbuddha

    At this point, as long as it's something my 7 year old will sit through (unlike Schreck 3, which she just got up and wandered off from, marketing tie-ins be damned) it's all love. A third Ice Age jumps the shark, hog ties him and then gang rapes him and while it's nice if these things are entertaining for us bigger kids, I don't get worked up over them. I am, however, sick of Scrat, or whatever the hell the nut rat's name is.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 8:17:06 AM CDT

    Have to admit...

    by rutgersjaffo

    ...I liked both of the previous Ice Age movies. I'm not saying I paid to see them in the theater or bought them on DVD or anything, but I do enjoy them. This is the part where LaserPants gets on the board and slams the movies for their historical inaccuracies...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 8:22:56 AM CDT

    I haven't seen Part Two yet bit this looks good...

    by batman begins sucks ass

    ...and I'll have to say it should be better than the Dark Knight.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 8:57:50 AM CDT

    I seriously love the first movie.

    by derlanghaarige

    A touching story with some good laughs and loveable characters. And it's some of the very rare occasions when the German dubbing improves a whole movie (instead of ruining it)! For any reason the German voice actors seem to had more fun with it than the originals.
    The second movie was okay. It wasn't bad but it wasn't as inspired as part 1. But it has a place in my heart for being my most interesting moviegoing experience so far. I was in Canada when I watched it and it was the first time that I saw a movie in a foreign theatre. And I can tell you one thing: This is the first time I've ever hear applaus during and after a movie! (Okay, it wasn't very phrenetic or even long and probably only 1/3 of the whole audience applauded, but it was a very interesting event. I still wish I would have been near a theatre where they played Slither, which came out in the same weekend.)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 9:16:02 AM CDT

    Blue Sky started off so well with the first Ice Age...

    by osmosis jones

    ...so it's been agressively depressing to see them churning out stinkers like Robots, Horton Hears A Who and Ice Age 2, which WALLOWED in fart and poop and butt jokes. Whatever happened to the inspired Chuck Jones quality of the first Ice Age?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 9:18:36 AM CDT

    The Return of "bugnuts"

    by dreamseller

    You couldn't resist to slip that one in, heh?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 9:20:19 AM CDT

    The movie is NOT Creationist propaganda

    by grampageezer

    I enjoyed the first two movies. They were refreshing and new. And the stylistic approach to the the animals were interesting and fun.
    As for people believing that Dinos and Ice Age animals lived side by side is about as silly as believing in Edgar Rice Burroughs' subterrain world, "Pellucida", or Arthur Conan Doyle's "Lost World" is based on fact.
    But if religious fundanutalists ever start teaching "Creationism" in our schools here in Wisconsin, I will definitely start home-schooling my boy.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 9:30:45 AM CDT

    Correct me if I'm wrong

    by the pusher

    But wasn't the whole point of the Ice Age franchise to do something BESIDES another dinosaur cartoon? I'd rather they bring humans back into the equation than introducing dinosaurs. Oh well, as long as it features Scrat.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 9:58:29 AM CDT

    So it's a prequel?

    by the gospel according to bastardface

    Because Dinosaurs and man ... two species separated by 65 million years of evolution, have suddenly been thrown into the mix together. How can we possibly have the slightest idea of what to expect? The first one was about a baby and now the Dinosaurs are involved. Retarded.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 10:01:44 AM CDT

    This series

    by series7

    Should have stayed a one off thing. The first one was really good, showing that someone besides Pixar can make a good kids movie still (Dreamworks doesn't count because they may as well just call there movies $ because that is the final AIM). And the sequel was just blah. I don't know why these animation studios haven't learned from Pixar? Make new movies not more sequels. I know Pixar did Toy Story 2, but come on its in the top 5 best sequels.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 10:25:07 AM CDT

    SAW THIS IN THE THEATRE

    by burgertime

    In front of Horton Hears a Who. It'll be fun. But when are they going to write a script around Scratt? That would be some funny shit. Just watching him mug for the camera cracks me up. lol

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 10:32:40 AM CDT

    I used to work at a public library...

    by docpazuzu

    ...in Marietta, Ohio, and one of my colleagues there was a Church of Christ fundie dumbass who actually believed in the whole 6,000-year-old Earth deal. Yes, she was a librarian. No, I'm not kidding. No, really, I'm not.

    It made for some hilarious (and quite sad) debates at work, let me tell you.

    That having been said, I have no problem with hooey like that in movies, books and comics as long as it's not pretending to be non-fiction.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 10:34:47 AM CDT

    "Yeah, at first it's all...

    by docpazuzu

    ...."oooh!" and "aaaah!" but then there's running and screaming."

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 10:35:46 AM CDT

    Harry, the film contains animals talking to each other!!!

    by big_bubbaloola

    But you have a problem with dinosaurs being in it? /facepalm

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 10:40:15 AM CDT

    Land of the Lost!

    by jamestewart007

    So a wollymamoth, a sabertoothed tiger and a sloth are in a giant hollow tree floating down a river when...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 10:42:40 AM CDT

    Doom on you.

    by juggernaut125

    Doom on you! Doom on YOU! DOOM ON YOU!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 11:08:24 AM CDT

    You want funny?

    by reel american hero


    You should read the creationist, 'Why Aren't There Dinosaurs In The Bible' pamphlet. That shit had me rolling. I don't normally knock one's beliefs but the shit is just so ludicrous I can't help it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 11:24:44 AM CDT

    Robots was not a stinker

    by jubba

  • Apr 08, 2008 11:29:53 AM CDT

    This is kind of Land before Timey

    by otis fairweather iii

    Ya know, the first one was okay and the rest became exponentially worse like each shit after a Taco Bell binge.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 11:42:38 AM CDT

    Same plot...

    by zerocorpse

    Quirky outsider(s) find that the thing that makes them rejects is the thing that makes them special and allows them to save the day.
    Smashmouth's "All Star" plays. Everybody dances. The end.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 11:47:38 AM CDT

    Trailer's alright, dinosaurs are alright.

    by o_goncho

    The bit where he pulls himself over with his eyes made me chuckle and admittedly when I was a kid I never even considered the idea that mammoths and t-rexes might have been seperated by millions of years worth of evolution, so I doubt many will fret about it nowadays either.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 12:38:39 PM CDT

    They've let us down.

    by yakmalla

    Looks like we can't count on the Ice Age franchise for scientific accuracy. We'll just have to lower our expectations and treat it as an enjoyable comedy aimed largely at kids. Damn.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 1:48:39 PM CDT

    Amen, kinetickoala!

    by angel_svn

    Did they not see the animal fall through a hole and into some deep cavern in the earth? It's an effing animated film full of fantasy. What the hell is wrong with people. And bitching about your need to home school your kids because of some Creationist agenda in your state ... get a life. Are you so insecure about what you believe you use a fantasy movie to complain about your horrible life? It's a movie, tards. I can't believe you idiots sucked me into commenting about it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 2:21:37 PM CDT

    The Lost World

    by darwinwins

    for children. Get over yourselves. The idea that science should somehow have domain over entertainment is ridiculous - some of the most retardedly fun movies have divorced themselves from reality years before the ragging against the fundies ever began.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 2:27:57 PM CDT

    SPOILER: a comet hits the earth and kills everything!

    by mike_d

    guess i shouldnt have put that in the title.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 2:53:47 PM CDT

    Trailer-720p-Direct-Link

    by betasword

    http://pdl.stream.aol.com/aol/us/moviefone/movies/2008/iceagedawnofthedinosaurs_030172/iceagedawnofthedinosaurs_trlr_01_720p_dl.mov

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 2:59:15 PM CDT

    Treiler-720p-TinyURL

    by betasword

    http://tinyurl.com/4hanll

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 3:52:23 PM CDT

    Seriously

    by movietool

    They couldn't have made it more obvious that the dinos in this movie will be of the "Lost World" long-hiddenin-an-underground-cavern variety.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 4:27:10 PM CDT

    WHY?

    by panther69

    Why do studios put out fucking teasers over a year before a film is released? Anyone? Bueller?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 4:53:11 PM CDT

    MISINFORMING CHILDREN! YAY!

    by mish87

  • Apr 08, 2008 4:59:46 PM CDT

    I refuse to watch any Ice Age movie until they pay

    by darquelyte

    Ivy Supersonic for her creation of the Scrat character.
    I don't care if the movies are Godfather quality...which of course they aren't.
    Ivy might be bugnuts crazy, but she did create the character. Fox is just trying to bury her with legal fees. Just pay the crazy bitch and she'll blow all the money on more of her dumb hats and more annoying tattoos.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 6:23:10 PM CDT

    *Sigh*. Once again for the hard of thinking...

    by biggusdickus

    ...It's a KIDS film, ok?
    Hello, McFly? Hello?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 8:25:07 PM CDT

    Let me mark my calandar

    by dazzler69

    Wait I don't have a 2009 calendar yet! I hate knowing about a movie over a year away.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sticking Dinosaurs in the wrong period for entertainment purposes is a long proud tradition.

    Zerocorpse - hey, isn't that the Shrek movies' plots as well? I've been had!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 08, 2008 9:10:55 PM CDT

    My God how can you not love pulling himself by his eyeballs

    by half vader

    or the snout slingshot? Geez Harry. The Ice Age Scrat teasers are as close as we've gotten to a classic WB short for ages.

    Maybe you're just mad Harry because everyone on the net had it up an Ice Age before you.

    The actual films are stale road/buddy movie crap though, storywise and pacing-wise. Blue Sky are the biggest disappointments to me as if you turn the sound down you'll see the actual animation is the best outside Pixar. They even dumbed down the initial graphic/stylised, jagged look of the first one for 2 and gave 'em regular fur. All such a waste...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 2:33:18 AM CDT

    Anyone got a SAVEABLE 1080p version?

    by half vader

    God I hate AOL. What am I gonna do? Take it on the street and sell it?! They DON"T want me to watch it repeatedly??

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 6:49:13 AM CDT

    Who says Mammoths and T-Rex's can't co-exist?

    by grampageezer

    Who says Mammoths and T-Rex's can't co-exist?
    I used to put them together all the time as a kid playing with my Marx Plasitc Dinosaur set. Even had little cavemen with it.
    That set was so cool.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 7:27:57 AM CDT

    mish87, here's another news flash

    by grammaton cleric binks

    Santa Claus isn't real, nor is the Easter Bunny, and Superman if he really existed, which he does not, could not be able to fly. It's called entertainment. Lighten up Francis.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 10:30:59 AM CDT

    grampageezer

    by docpazuzu

    I still have my set! Those things were awesome, especially the palm trees with removeable foliage and the animals' names imprinted on their tails or bellies.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 10:39:33 AM CDT

    Did yours have the 3 mountains?

    by grampageezer

    All Marx toys were cool. I also had the Flintstones Bedrock set.

    The one I reeally wanted was the Deluxe Ben Hur Chariot Race Colliseum set, but my parents couldn't affort the whopping cost (then) of $19.99 for it. Nowadsys it's selling for over $500 on ebay.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 11:42:13 AM CDT

    Now can we have a Devil Dinosaur movie?

    by dingbatty

    Kirby style on the big screen, yes please.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 11:47:41 AM CDT

    grampageezer

    by docpazuzu

    Nah, I had the non-deluxe version. My cousin had a massive set with tons more animals and landscape pieces and I hated the bastard for that.

    I also still have the little booklet that came with my set with info on each of the animals. Cool stuff.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 11:48:42 AM CDT

    Dingbatty

    by docpazuzu

    Devil Dinosaur was the shit! Devil and Moonboy fighting aliens and giant ants and monsters. Awesome!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 2:54:20 PM CDT

    DocPazuzu

    by grampageezer

    I know what you mean. My cousin had the ultracool Marx Alamo set with the metal and plastic buildings and Davy Crockett and Jim Bowie figures. I hated him for it, too.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 2:57:08 PM CDT

    Dinosaurs Attack!

    by grampageezer

    Back in the 90s Topps came out with a card set based on "Mars Attacks!" called "Dinosaurs Attacks!" That would be a fun, cheesy movie to see made.
    And BTW, Mars Attacks wasn't very good because it didn't have any giant insects in it like the cards.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 09, 2008 7:54:29 PM CDT

    Just make a scrat movie instead.

    by drewlicious

    I could watch that thing all day.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 10, 2008 2:28:47 AM CDT

    Hitler?

    by jarreth99

    After meeting the dinosaurs the gang save martin luther king from the evil pharoh. After that they battle an army of zombie robot hitler clones whos olny weakness is the power of love and cold fusion. I cant wait!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 14, 2008 11:16:45 AM CDT

    "HIstorically Innacurate"

    by getme

    Hey um idiots
    THEY OBVIOUSLY FALL THROUGH SOME SORT OF CAVERVEN SYSTEM LIKE IN LAND OF THE LOST AND FIND AN EVEN OLDER PREHISTORIC ECOSYSTEM.
    plus...
    IT"S A DAMN CARTOON GET OVER IT!

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback