Cool News
Spell Checker examines and reviews Michael Mann's Untitled 60 MINUTES/Big Tobacco Film!!!
Every now and again I get a review that really makes me think that something special may very well be upon a horizon. This is one of those reviews. Glen and I have been giant fans of Michael Mann's work for quite some time. The visual emotions he weaves on screen often drown me, and I love it. BUT... His coming film on the whole 60 MINUTES/Jeffrey Wigand/BIG TOBACCO deal, well it had me hoping and praying for something along the lines of an ALL THE PRESIDENT'S MEN sort of film. Seems like it's different, but magnificient in it's own right. Before we get too out of line in love with this film, let us realize that this is... just a single review. A single peep from behind the veil. Hopefully more of you that witnessed this film will let us hear your thoughts, but for now... I'll end this with a note to Bill Mechanic, "Gotcha! Tag you're it!"
Thought you might be interested... I had the lucky chance to stumble into
a test- screening for the latest Michael Mann project, an as-yet untitled
true life story about Jeffrey Wigand, the guy who blew the whistle on Brown
and Morrison tobacco.
Just to sum up a bit, in case you were on Mars a few years ago, the latest
Michael Mann project is the story of Jeffrey Wigand (played by Russel Crowe
in the film), a high-up official at a Big Tobacco company, who, after being
fired, let the cat out of the bag when he revealed that Brown and
Williamson was spiking it's cigarettes with ammonia and nicotine in order
to make them more addictive. When 60 Minutes producer Lowell Bergman
(played by Al Pacino in the film) stumbles onto this, he dogs Wigand to
give an interview for 60 minutes to drop the bomb on the world with one of
the scoops of the century. With much coaxing, Wigand agrees... but then 60
Minutes (or more specifically CBS Execs, if you bvelieve the film) get cold
feet, and decide to pull the spot fearing a lawsuit from Big Tobacco.
Later on, Wigand's remarks go public on the record, and CBS ends up airing
the spot anyway.
To me, Mann has always made good films, but there's always been something
lacking in each one... Last of the Mohicans had some really wonderful
moments (who could ever forget the slow motion hand-to-hand combat at the
film's climax???), but as a whole I found it to be cheesy... Heat had some
amazing action sequences, high tension, and nail-biting suspense, but was
missing nicely textured characterization.
Well somehow, through sheer luck, I managed to pick up a couple tickets to
a first test screening at the Twentieth Century Fox lot's Darryl F. Zanuck
theater! Security was quite tight, we were searched several times,
questioned and probed and poked and prodded, before being allowed into the
theater. All this led many to believe we were seeing Star
Wars Episode 1... Yeah right... Any true fan knows George Lucas would NEVER
test screen a film... He makes his own decisions regardless of what anyone
else says...
We were led into the theater, perhaps the ultimate super-cool screening
room... Plush chairs, no-stick floors, HUMONGOUS screen... Along the back
wall a nice little area lined with couches and cushy chairs... In the
center of the theater a bank of computers and what looked to be lots and
lots of audio equipment. I was there an hour early, so I managed to secure
a nice spot in line, and a great seat in the center of the theater. I
started chatting with a couple who sat beside me. We debated as the
whether it was Any Given Sunday, or the Michael Mann project...
Soon a gentleman strode into the theater, stepped down below the screen,
and announced that we were here to see a test screening of a work print...
Explaining that there would be lots of scratches on the film, colors out of
whack, and a temp track on the audio. There would be no titles, the film
would merely start and then, when over, end... He simply walked into the
back of the theater, and, without a clue as to what the film could be, it
started...
This film is, without a doubt, Michael Mann's masterpiece. Take all the
best elements of the previous films he's made (leaving out the cheese of
Mohicans and flimsy characters of Heat), wrap them together, and you've got
this film... Even in it's rough cut form, it's clearly one of the best
film's I've seen in the past year. The plot, which could have been a
jumbled, confusing mess, is tightly constructed, smart, witty, intelligent,
and most of all, TENSE. From start to finish in this project there is
non-stop TENSION. The film runs a little over two and a half hours, in
it's unfinished form at least, and you don't look at your watch once.
You're absolutley rivited from start to finish. At times the film's
portrayal of Jeff Wigand's paranoia is down-right HAUNTING and CHILLING.
The performances that Mann gets from his actors are absolutely wonderful.
I've got to admit, I've never been a big Pacino fan. I like him, but think
he's overrated. He's got this over-the-top loud-mouth style that has a
tendency to run-rampant and suffocate the other elements of any film he's
in(witness Carlito's Way). On the other hand, he's also capable of
wonderful subtlety (witness Godfather 1 and 2). I'm happy to say Michael
Mann has him playing it subtle in this one. Pacino plays the part of
Lowell Bergman, a producer for 60 Minutes with 15 years experience on the
show who's never betrayed his sources. Until now. Lowell promises Wigand
that he'll be protected if he talks to 60 Minutes... But unfortunately, Big
Tobacco turns out to be a bigger adversary than he ever imagined... And
soon Pacino finds himself in the position of being a producer who cannot
protect his source. Wigand loses his home, his family, his friends... all
due to the wrath of Big Tobacco. Michael Mann manages to coax a quiet,
subtle (for Pacino) performance out of him... We really feel the terrible
guilt that eats away at Pacino, leading us to his logical retirement at the
end of the film...
Russel Crowe, who adds a few pounds to his frame, as well as lots of grey
dye to his hair in order to play Wigand, gives his most textured and deeply
moving performance to date. He doesn't play his usual tough-guy... quite
the contrary, as Crowe protrays him, Wigand is a sympathetic every-man who
carries a great deal of pain within him. You really feel for this poor guy,
who seems to be stuck between the machinery of Big Tobacco and The Media.
He loses his job, his family, his friends, his respect, and just about
everything he ever worked for in his life... To reveal the truth about the
lies and deceit within his country.... In one incredibly moving sequence,
Wigand, who has lost everything since blowing the whistle, sits alone in a
darkened hotel room, fantasizing about his two daughters, and the way his
life used to be.... In a single poetic shot we see a side-view of
Wigand... We begin to pan, slowly, ever so slowly, around him, while the
hotel room in the background subtley morphs into his backyard, his
daughters playing happily... It's an incredible sequence in it's subtlety,
you've really got to see it to believe it.... The emotion that Crowe is
just too painful to describe...
A special tip of the hat goes to Christopher (Cry Havoc! And let slip the
dogs of war!) Plummer, who portrays Mike Wallace.... I don't want to
reveal too much here, but he truly gives one gem of a performance, showing
us a side of Wallace we've never seen, but don't have any problem buying...
I don't know what Wallace is like off camera, but I have a feeling Plummer
has captured him perfectly! This performance will bring a smile to your face!
The camera work is a bit of a departure for Mann... It's a lot of hand-held
work, shaky and out of focus (or maybe that was because it was a work
print). Either way, it works for the film, giving it an edgy, immediate
feel that makes you really believe you're right there as everything is
happening. Call me an idiot, but I really felt like I was watching a
finished film. I don't see very much that can be cut out at this point...
I loved every moment of it...
The whole experience was a delight from start to finish. From stepping
onto the 20th Century Fox lot, to entering the Darryl F. Zanuck theater...
I felt like I was in heaven. I couldn't have picked a better film to have
gone to a test screening for. This thing is a serious oscar-contender (if
the Academy has the balls to nominate a quality film [for once] with a
super-controversial topic). I can't wait to see the final cut of this
film... If you're looking for a truly intelligent and though-provoking
film, this is going to be it. Hurrah for Michael Mann!!!!!!
Sorry I've gone on so long. Hope you find this of interest... If you put
this up, just call me...
SPELL CHECKER....
-
+ Expand All
-
sounds like a rental to me.
-
Apparently this project hasn't excited a lot of interest. Usually there are a glut of posts before I arrive. At any rate, this article has whetted my appetite to see the "tobacco movie," as it's often referred to. The plot is unappealing -- that is to say, it's political -- but from the way its described here, it sounds more like a character study / drama than an big business expose. And that ( for me ) is a good thing. I'm always interested to see what Mann will cook up next, although Heat was a letdown -- two or three splashy setpieces in search of a movie. The problem was the script. Mann's visuals never fail to make your eyes pop out on stalks, but unfortunately, he seems to have a tin ear for dialogue. Not only is his writing bad, but it has sticking power. No matter how hard I try, I will never be able to forget that "I gotta hold onto my angst" crap from Heat. Let's not even mention "You sift through the detritus..." Hopefully he's working with a collaborator on this new one, or maybe the nonfictive nature of this story will keep him on the straight and narrow. Hope hope. By the way, a friend of mine worked on this movie in a capacity I probably shouldn't disclose. She would often bitch about Michael Mann. She called him "a major a**hole" on more than one occasion. But she's an airhead -- I'll wager she destroyed quite a few shots with her bumbling. Why is it that that nitwit can get a job in Hollywood and I can't? Two words: Tatas. I hope Mann made the most of them. A**hole.
-
May 15, 1999 3:12:24 AM CDT
HEAT does not have "flimsy characters" and it is not CRAP, but t
by wittman
I can't believe all the negativity I am hearing towards Mann's masterpiece, HEAT. I saw this film ten times when it came out and I stand by my subject line, it is one of the fifteen or twenty best films of this decade. I can't believe all this crap about how loud and overrated people think Pacino is. The guy is fucking incredible (as if that needed to be said again!). You guys need to get some taste. Still, I can't wait to see this TOBACCO project. Mann is the Man!!!
-
This flick sounds like a movie from the 70's renaissance of movies. Directors like Alan Pakula and Arthur Penn took their lead from the New Wave of French films and made noir tinged character studies of powerlessness and desire. Too few films today deal with the compromises men make on the path to losing their dreams. Watch Night Moves with Gene Hackman or The Parralax View with Warren Beatty.
Even Shampoo might fit with the tone and perspective on human failities. It's funny to be writing this on the site that is my source of finding flicks with the best explosions.
Thanks for the review -
I agree totally that Heat is one of the best movies ever made....Al Pacino's "over the top" acting fit his policeman's persona perfectly...its how he does his job...the imtimadator with the soft heart at home...one of Mann's recurring themes...Mann has topped himself with each new movie he directs...this one will be his best yet!
-
As an admirer of Mann's work, I really hope Spell Checker's enthusiasm is genuine (my apprehension coming from how he's relatively new to the site, and the fact that I wouldn't put it past Mechanic to commission a fake review for his own amusement, since he's so proud of being able to thwart the ol' AICN spies.) Ever since I saw MANHUNTER in a nearly empty theater on opening night (thank god people finally came around on that one,) I've awaited his subsequent projects with great excitement, and, although there have only been two films (not counting L.A. TAKEDOWN) since then, he hasn't disappointed...... much. THE LAST OF THE MOHICANS was so exciting, I forgot that Cooper's novel was one of the most boring and unrewarding reading experiences of my life (save for those great N.C. Wyeth illustrations that were in my copy. Wow!) HEAT, which I'll admit suffered from severe bloat (e.g. the suicidal child subplot, and the essentially extraneous coffee shop scene that seemed to exist only to bring two titans of acting together for the first time,) was uneven, but when it worked, it was pure genius. The botched heist, which leads to that great shoot-out on the streets of L.A., remains my favorite action sequence of all time (the sound editing is so damn perfect, it's frightening!) I guess Mann is working on a different canvas here, but that's cause for excitement, as well. It's when great filmmakers stretch that they often deliver their masterpieces (SULLIVANS TRAVELS and SCHINDLER'S LIST, minus the protracted ending, spring immediately to mind.) As for cuthbert..... if you're going to make such an outrageous statement regarding the GODFATHER movies, at least back it up with some evidence. For starters, I've got Gordon Willis' brilliantly shadowy cinematography, Pacino's deftly shaded performances, and Coppola's masterful storytelling (with a structure so precise you could set a clock to it,) on my side. What, pray tell, do you have?
-
come on guys, i think you're being a bit too critical of heat. i mean, yeah, there were a few parts that coulda been cut out. i for one always felt that the black driver guy shouldn't have been there. i think man's only real weakness is that he sometimes leaves in stuff that he should have taken out and vice versa. i mean, if mohicans had the length of heat and heat had the length of mohicans, both woulda pretty much perfect movies. but anyway, i thought the cafe scene and te bank robbery were two of the best scenes in a movie of this decade. and by the way, isn' the tobacco movie called man of the people?
-
A lot of people criticize Al Pacino for overacting. While this is sometimes true (how he won the Oscar in 1992 for SCENT OF A WOMAN is beyond me -- HOO-HAH indeed), his earlier work ranks among the best screen acting I've ever seen. THE PANIC IN NEEDLE PARK, THE GODFATHER, SERPICO, SCARECROW, THE GODFATHER PART II, DOG DAY AFTERNOON, AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. All brilliant performances (he was nominated for most of those films, but unfortunately never won -- until the aforementioned SCENT OF A WOMAN). Probably the biggest loss came in 1974 when he was nominated for THE GODFATHER PART II. How he lost to Art Carney of all people is a crime. As for the "later" films, SCARFACE, SEA OF LOVE, GLENGARRY GLEN ROSS, and CARLITO'S WAY are his best since the 1970s, I think. Of course seeing Pacino on stage is a totally different, electrifying experience. A couple of years ago I had the pleasure of seeing him in Eugene O'Neill's two-character one-act play HUGHIE at the Long Wharf Theatre in New Haven (his co-star: Paul Benedict, Mr. Bentley on THE JEFFERSONS). Pacino was brilliant, and gave one of the best performances I've ever seen on stage.
-
Art Carney's win for HARRY AND TONTO was, essentially, old Hollywood awarding a man for his many achievements in the past, and less for his work in the actual film for which he was honored (although, he was quite good in H&T, just not *brilliant* like Pacino.) It's ironic, then, that in 1992, Pacino would win in the same fashion over another actor who was much more impressive; that being Denzel Washington in MALCOLM X. What can you say..... it's that damn specious logic that consistently undermines the integrity of the Oscars.
-
I'm intrigued byt this review of the Cigarette movie. In the past,
I've found Michael Mann a little ham-handed when it comes to making films. His first few seasons of Miami Vice were top-notch and his adaption of the first Thomas Harris book, Manhunter, was one of the few made for tv flicks that stands the test of time. However, Last of the Mohicans was a yawnfest and Heat (despite having one of the best caper/heist scenes ever and being one of my 50 year old father's favorite films) is a 12 hour-long mess. So when I say I am intrigued by this review it is because Spell Checker notes that the characterizations are subtle and the camera style is something we haven't come to expect from Mann. He has no problem buidling scenes of tension, so I have no problem with accepting that the scenes of Wigland's paranoia are outstanding. Pacino, though, Holy Washed Up Over The Top Actor! Hoo-haw, I'm a blind colonel. Hoo-haw, I'm Richard the Third! Hoo-haw, I'm Tony Montana, man! Hoo-haw, I'm Serpico! Hoo-haw, I'm a staright polce officer exploring the gay leather lifestyle! Hoo-haw, I'm the Mayor! Hoo-haw, I'm a Dick Tracy viilain! Hoo-haw, I'm a revolutionary! Hoo-haw, I'm a gay bank robber! Here's an actor with a sense of characterization range so small he only rivals Robert DeNiro in the long list of the same performances (despite the character) over and over and over again. I'll see this film when it comes out; love the angle of the story and genuinely interested in seeing Mann's interpretation. But I have a feeling that I will be seeing Pacino say, "Hoo-haw, I'm a Sixty Minutes producer!" -
For the critics of Heat, which I am glad to see have already been reprimanded by the majority of these posts, they should remember that Mann wrote, directed and produced that film, qualifying his credit as the crafter of a genuine masterpiece. I cannot be more excited about this new project, and this review someone has made that possible. I am still curious if anyone has heard anything else about that long-ago rumored Mann-helmed feature based on William Gibson's "Count Zero", check out IMDB if u are still unaware. I mean, the concept of Mann directing a slick science fiction thriller would drive me insane with anticipation. Regardless, Mann is one of the most talented and visionary directors I have ever seen, Heat reminds me of Sogo Ishi's "Angel Dust", very similar use of visual styles, imagine Heat throught yellow and green tinted lenses. I reccomend it to anyone who appreciated Heat's cinematography.
-
what movie was you watching? Those characters were all developed. Well of course I guess you could say they were flimsy characters if you watched Heat on NBC. Well I look forward to Micheal Mann's new movie but not because of what you said. You can't review a movie worth a damn.
-
This sounds like an interesting film. I'll probably check it out simply because I like Mann. I was unaware he did Last of the Mohicans, but I think I'll see it as well. I enjoyed Heat because it had a certain style I expected and enjoyed from his work on Miami Vice. Almost exactly the same. Meanwhile, Manhunter is an absolutely first rate film and IMHO constantly competes with Seven as my favorite introcate thriller/murder mystery movie. I enjoyed it more than I did Silence of the Lambs. (Although I did like Hopkins performance of Lektor better since Hannibal the Cannibal had a meatier storyline and dialogue to chew on.) I've been made to understand there may be another book involving Lektor being released soon. Personally, I'd like to see Mann direct a movie where Lektor (Hopkins) goes after Graham (William Petersen) and fubars his life into a total clusterfuck from which I don't know who, if anyone, should come out on top. It could be interesting.
-
I'm glad to know that I'm not the only one who thinks HEAT is a fantastic film. I would go an extra step and say that it's 'fucking awsome.' I count HEAT as one of my favorite films. Just so you know where I'm coming from, some other favorites of mine are, Seven Samurai, Red Beard, Blade Runner, Leon:Integral Version (the director's cut of The Professional), Ran, Empire Strikes Back, Akira, Yojimbo and Taxi Driver to name a few. Anyhow, to argue the point of HEAT's running time, I feel that the film is too short. I would gladly sit through a four hour version that further explores Lauren's character, her relationship with her father, and why those berets were so important. I think that the film would benefit from having a longer running time. I'm hoping that the DVD will contain extra footage. Leon:Integral Version, the director's cut of 'The Professional,' which contains 22 extra minutes of footage, adds vital character development which was missing from the cut version. In fact, the whole middle of the film, which contains most of the charactor development was cut. If you have yet to experience Leon:Integral version...e-mail me. Back to Mann: I'll see anything he puts out. His current film sounds intriguing. Although, I was sorry to see that he ceased production on 'Zen Differential' to shoot this film. However, it does make sense, since 'Zen Differential' is an adaption of William Gibson's 'Count Zero,' which is the sequel to 'Neuromancer,' which hasn't been made in to a film yet. Chris Cunningham, whose prior experience lies in the music video medium, is set to direct the 'Neuromancer' film. I would much rather see Mann helm the 'Neuromancer' film and perhaps direct the entire trilogy. It's nice to see Mann shifting gears though. I think it's important for a filmmaker to explore the different genres of film and stretch out a little. His films have gradually gotten better, HEAT being his best. Damn, I can never keep a consistent thought in these talk backs. I'm all over the place. In summation, HEAT: should've been longer. Mann: great filmmaker. ME: erratic in talk backs.
-
May 16, 1999 2:05:18 PM CDT
I don't feel sorry for Wigland, he's the one that chose such a s
by paragonian
It sounds like a great, great film though. I also totally agree with Heat and The Last of the Mohicans, although with all their flaws they're still incredibly good. Even with what Wigland did, I still think it was incredibly brave what he did but he'll still burn in hell, if there is one along with the CBS executives or any one else that stopped this segment from running. DAMN YOU ALL!
-
For those that believe that Michael Mann's characters are all flat and have no depth, check out Thief, or Jericho Mile. Both of these films have powerful character. As far as I'm concerned Mann is the greatest under appreciated director around today.
-
was a much better movie than HEAT and proves that many Hollywood feature directors really flourish on TV. Like Tony Scott. The man was born to direct a X-FIlES episode. L.A. TAKEDOWN had great acting, you really believed in the desperation of all the actors, and the heist was suspenseful. This movie vs. HEAT is a classic example of substance vs. style.
-
Let's clear up something first, "L.A. Takedown" does NOT have good acting in it, but makes for fun viewing for fans of "Heat". I have the film on tape, have watched it more than once and conclude that it is a PRIME example of how a talanted actor can take the same line and make it work as apposed to someone just saying the words. "L.A. Takedown" was a good practice run for what later bloomed into "Heat", which was written directly after "Thief" and sat on a shelf for years. Like the best filmmakers, Mann has his detractors, and anyone who can write off his abilities as part of "MTV" generation of filmmakers has a limited knowledge of cinema history. Just where do you think MTV directors get their ideas from? It's not like the techniques used in music videos were invented in 1981. Just combine Eisenstein editing with the freedom of camera movement from Welles and the expert use of matching music and visuals like Kubrick and you have a formula for MTV. Remember, most of the stylistics in "Thief", including the wet streets, colored lighting and bombastic score (one of Tangerine Dream's finest) were incoporated into "Miami Vice" four years later, just as that show was dubbed "MTV Cops" for lack of a better "buzz word" category to fit it in. Mann's cinematic knowledge is vast and constantly expanding. He's one of the few directors today (David Fincher included) who actually moves away from styles thay have often pioneered. For the curious, just examine how differently Mann photographed the action scenes in "Thief" and "Mohicans" which contatin many slow-motion (Peckinpahish) shots while "Heat" is almost without any. Then go take a look at the wild and erratic jump-cuts in "Manhunter". It's inspiring to see an artist like Mann exploring his craft from film to film. His work with actors is almost always excellent, just ask James Caan, DeNiro, Pacino and Daniel Day-Lewis for a reference. As for his writing, well there is no pleasing everyone, but considering the amount of research Mann puts into his work and the extensive use of consultants on his projects, it wouldn't surprise me if most of his stories and dialogue are pulled from real life. Since I've already read the "Big Tobacco" screenplay, my excitment is already swelling, for this IS new territory for the director, but something perfectly sutited to his skills. And as for "The Keep", well the first hour is pretty good and follows the novel quite well, but does develop many problems in the last act. Since Mann's chief special effects man Wally Vevers died during production, and nobody could figure out how to finish the effects he created (Vevers never revealed his secrets) Mann had to drop many scenes that could have fleshed out these areas of the film. But enough of all that, Mr. Mann has a new film coming out, along with Mr. Kubrick, Mr. Fincher, Mr. Scorsese and Mr. Stone, which is plenty for any admirer of compelling cinema to be joyful about.
-
Thanks for the review encouraging me to see this film. I'll definitely be there -- it will be interesting to see how it's promoted, given the power of Big Tobacco to inhibit negative information flow.
A grammar note:
It's = it is
Its = possessive pronoun
Great article. -
I read the other day that the film has been given the tite
'A Man For The People'. I think it's good.
Brad Ellmoos -
This is my first Talk Back. Glad to join the club. Wintermute, I'm very happy to see that I'm not alone in associating the look of the haunting film "Angel Dust" with that of "Heat". Though the feel of the two films couldn't be more different. Other than the look, however, there is another simularity between "Dust" and "Heat". There could be an argument made that both could have used a little extra cutting. I, however, am not a suporter of this theory. It is standard practice for artists to want to let the audience linger over ever nuance of their characters, and absorb the whole mood and tone. John Cassavettes is another director who is continuosly critisized for over indulging with his films. Fuck off. These are men who want to tell the story there way. Now, I'm not saying that this applies for every film (Anyone see "Meet Joe Black"?). But, in my opinion, with "Heat", Mann does a great job of making possibly the first LA "epic". So, this "Tobacco Movie" is clocked in at 2 and 1/2 hours? I'm sure I'll relish every minute in a great director's hands.
-
re: Chinaski/Cuthbert
You may not like Pacino, but there are a lot of us who do! As for subtle performances, you do not have to go all the way back to the Godfather movies--just rent Donnie Brasco--a great Pacino performance where he was NOT SHOUTING " HOO-HAW."
As for not liking the Godfather movies (especially 1 and 2)--that is not only stupid, but un-American!
Readers Talkback
User Login
Top Talkbacks
- UPDATED!!! A Six-Pack Of New Character Posters For THE DARK KNIGHT RISES Forecast A Lot Of Gotham Rain And Snow!! -- 199 total posts 199 posts
- Tom Cruise Saddles Up For A Remake Of THE MAGNIFICENT SEVEN!! -- 133 total posts 131 posts
- Baz's THE GREAT GATSBY explodes with one helluva dazzling trailer! -- 142 total posts 128 posts
- Mark Millar Offers Some Interesting Insight Into The KICK-ASS Movie Sequel!! -- 108 total posts 108 posts
- Quint sees some DJANGO UNCHAINED footage at CANNES!!! -- 327 total posts 88 posts
- A Fire Definitely Rises In The New DARK KNIGHT RISES One Sheet!! -- 215 total posts 87 posts
- When there’s no more room in Hell The Behind the Scenes Pic of the Day will walk the earth. -- 70 total posts 70 posts
- SPOILER ALERT! AICN COMICS/POPTARDS PODCAST: JUSTICE LEAGUE! DANCER! INCREDIBLE HULK! HARDCORE! NEW CRUSADERS! INVINCIBLE IRON MAN! DANGER CLUB! -- 69 total posts 69 posts
- Stay Away From The Creepy Girl Alone In The Parking Lot For THE POSSESSION's Poster!! -- 43 total posts 41 posts
- Zach Galifianakis Is Ignatius J. Reilly? -- 41 total posts 41 posts