Logo

Cool News

Capone Travels To 10,000 B.C. With MISS PETTIGREW & Pulls Off THE BANK JOB During THE BAND'S VISIT!!

Published at:  Mar 07, 2008 9:15:01 AM CST


Hey everyone. Capone in Chicago here.

Well, actually, that's a lie. By the time you read this, I'll be in the early days of the SXSW Film Festival. I'll have coverage of a few films from SXSW coming up soon, as well as a few interviews I picked up at the festival. And somehow magically, I'm also covering Chicago's European Union Film Festival, which is taking place throughout the month of March at the Gene Siskel Film Center, and has, over the years, become the Chicago-area film festival I look forward to the most. But first, I still wanted to make sure you got the line on a few things that were opening up this week.

Enjoy…



MISS PETTIGREW LIVES FOR A DAY

My favorite film opening this week (one that has quite a few decent flicks to choose from) is the story of the titular failed British governess (played with full quirky glory by Frances McDormand) who can't get a job in proper society and through a bit a trickery ends up being the social secretary to rising young redheaded bombshell actress Delysia Lafosse (ENCHANTED's Amy Adams) in London, circa 1939. War is about to take over the lives of the country, but that doesn't stop high society from acting just as decadent as they please.

The dowdy Miss Pettigrew must keep all her young charge's boyfriends (including a dirt-poor piano player played by "Pushing Daisies'" Lee Pace, a club owner played by Mark Strong from STARDUST, and a young playboy played by Tom Payne) from bumping into each other, while giving Delysia life lessons on following her heart and not relying on rich men to make her happy and stable. McDormand is absolutely perfect as the overwhelmed, out-of-her-element Pettigrew, but it's Adams who steals every scene, primarily because she's partially undressed most of the time. Adams has never been sexier, clearly drawing influence from Marilyn Monroe, but creating a wholly unique persona that every straight (and a few not-so-straight) man in the audience will fall in love with.


The entire film takes place in about a 24-hour period, and things never stop moving. Additional supporting players Shirley Henderson and the always-reliable Ciaran Hinds as a disintegrating couple just add to the wonder that is MISS PETTIGREW. The film is loaded with great period music, expertly choreographed physical humor, rapid-fire dialogue and costumes so sparkly that you might have spots before your eyes after watching the film. Director Bharat Nalluri (whose last work was the exceptional HBO film TSUNAMI: THE AFTERMATH) has put together a masterful combination of giddy antics and emotionally solid themes about being yourself and loving someone who brings out your greatest passion. The film is colorful, joyous, and, above all, funny. MISS PETTIGREW LIVES FOR A DAY made me laugh the hardest so far in 2008, and I'm going to have to insist you check it out.




10,000 B.C.

We don't need a big number like 10,000 to explain the potential impact of this film about a primitive white tribal leader (Steven Straight of The Covenant) who unites and leads the other tribes of Africa in an attempt to free slaves taken by the more advanced Egyptians to build their pyramids. Let me pick a number like 50; I might even go as high as 60.

My numbers represent the number of years 10,000 B.C. could potentially set back cinematic race relations in this country with its tale of a white savior of the black people. To add insult to the mountains of injury this film inflicted upon me, another facet of the plot involves a prophecy featuring a blue-eyed child (who grows up to be the comically hot Camilla Belle, who is about as convincing as a prehistoric woman as Linda Harrison or Estella Warren in either version of PLANET OF THE APES.


But even forgetting the racial implications of this bloated, self-important joke of a film, its most glaring crime is that it's horribly boring. Weighted down with a useless narration by Omar Sharif (!), the movies tries to convince us that it's about something deep and spiritual with its lengthy discussions of the gods and spirits and demons and warriors. Bring on the saber tooth tigers, and shut the fuck up! I hate to sound like a Neanderthal moviegoer, but if you're going to load up your action film with so much talk, have it mean something and spend a little time on making the dialogue interesting.


Director Roland Emmerich (STARGATE; INDEPENDENCE DAY; the U.S. version of GODZILLA; THE DAY AFTER TOMORROW) manages to put together a few nice special effects sequences involving wooly mammoths, the aforementioned tigers and these strange predators that look like a cross between velociraptors and ostriches.

The best scenes are the two involving mammoth stampedes, but even those seem strikingly similar to what Peter Jackson did in both RETURN OF THE KING and KING KONG. The scale of the film once we get to Egypt (I assume it's Egypt; the film doesn't make that clear) is impressive. The images of the pyramids and other monuments under construction are pretty cool, but the sense of awe wears off quickly once people start to talk again.

But like most Emmerich films, the characters are more like sketches of human beings, the story is laughable and the emotions ring false at every turn. But he goes a step further into banality by setting his film (which he co-wrote) in the cradle of civilization and trivializing humankind's very existence. This film isn't just dull; it's insulting. I don't expect historical accuracy or good science from a Roland Emmerich movie, but at least he's managed to entertain me on a so-bad-it's-good level. But 10,000 B.C. doesn't even manage that.




THE BANK JOB

I'm a Jason Statham apologist, even though I don't think I should have to be. There's something about the little guy with the bald head and muscular build that I just find commanding on screen. He can hold together a B-movie action film like nobody's business and deliver one liners with as much authority as Arnold or Bruce or Sly (maybe even better than Sly).

He doesn't get too many opportunities to flex his acting muscle, which is why I was especially excited to see him in Roger Donaldson's THE BANK JOB, a top-notch, '70s-era heist film that bothers to develop an army of characters to such a degree that I actually cared about them. Go figure. Based on the infamous Lloyds Bank robbery of 1971, which, in addition to cash and jewels, netted its perpetrators some pretty scandalous photos of high-ranking government officials and even a member of the royal family. In addition to showing us the haphazard way the job was carried out by a group of smalltime crooks, the film extends its story to show us the levels of power that were involved in solving the crime and catching (in some cases killing) those that pulled it off.


Statham plays the leader of the criminal gang, who is tipped off by a former flame (Saffron Burrows) to a bank vault whose alarm is turned off temporarily. Leading a colorful team of specialists, Statham is fascinating to watch as he navigates between his team members in the first half of the film and later as a master negotiator who is trying to keep his part of the loot, while keeping the British secret police from killing him and his gang. Director Donaldson (THIRTEEN DAYS; THE RECRUIT; SPECIES; and a person favorite, NO WAY OUT) is absolutely in his element in a complex, layered story such as this.

He takes us through the twists and turns and dirty deals and nasty events, giving us a crackling great story with personality to spare. He even borrows heavily from the style of such films made in the 1970s, to add an extra level of winking authenticity to the proceedings. THE BANK JOB is a smart film about not-so-smart people doing incredibly dumb things with unfathomable results. Oh, you'll get a kick out of this one, I promise. Piece of advice if you do see it: I wouldn't recommend going to the bathroom during this movie, or you'll miss about six plot turns.




THE BAND'S VISIT

In a classic example of an odd story told so beautifully that it rises to the level of magical, THE BAND'S VISIT (which for a time was Israel's Best Foreign Language Oscar contender until the academy decided it had too much English in it) is a warm-hearted, slice-of-life piece about an Egyptian police orchestra that lands in Israel to play at the opening ceremony of a Arab Cultural Center.

When the straight-laced band members end up on the wrong bus and travel to a remote part of the country, they must rely on the kindness of strangers for a night before they get on the right bus for the ceremony the next day. Not much happens in the film but I don't mean to imply that the film isn't wildly entertaining. The rural Israelis give the band members food and lodging for the night, and what results is a series of conversations, moving moments, amusing episodes and even small-scale romance that pass the time and bring a bit of much-needed understanding to this small corner of the world.

There are no bad guys in the film, but that doesn't stop the story from having occasional moments of unease and tension. But the clear point of the film is to build bridges between people not destroy them. Staying away from most obvious avenues of sentimentality, THE BAND'S VISIT is more about getting to know the unfamiliar to alleviate fear and actual form the basis for friendships. The film's small and quiet nature is used to perfection, and the performances (especially those of Sasson Gabei as the band's leader and the lovely Ronit Elkabetz as the Israeli woman who encourages the town to take these men into their homes) are suitably understated.

In the end, neither people nor places have changed drastically, but it's fun to watch them get just a little better.

Capone








    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Mar 07, 2008 9:17:09 AM CST

    You saw 10,000 BC?

    by jimmy rabbitte

  • Mar 07, 2008 9:18:29 AM CST

    ...

    by jimmy rabbitte

    ...sorry you had to sit through that...

    ...damned taking two posts for what could've fit into one.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 07, 2008 9:19:17 AM CST

    Emmerich GOTTA EAT

    by se7en

  • Mar 07, 2008 9:21:58 AM CST

    10,000 Bull Chud!

    by filmfunk

    I fancy the Bank job but hear it aint that good and I believe Revolver or was it Volver has finally made it to the UsA which i'd be interested to hear if that played any better over your side coz it flunked here but i thought it was confusingly entertaining!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 07, 2008 9:29:33 AM CST

    Why does CGI suck so much?

    by i dunno

    The CGI in Jurassic Park was great and it was the first movie to use CGI for anything realistic. Since then, no one can make a realistic CGI creature to save their life. In Star Wars they threw a rug over an elephant and they had a Bantha that looked real. They couldn't slap come fangs on a tiger in this movie?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 07, 2008 9:31:16 AM CST

    Bank Job

    by dr. stanley goodspeed

    i think between that and in bruges my saturday afternoon is set.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 07, 2008 9:33:35 AM CST

    bank job was a bore

    by holodigm

    it was basically the real mccoy without mommy issues.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 07, 2008 9:35:18 AM CST

    The Band's Visit

    by mastidon

    I hope it gets lots of attention. I really enjoyed that film abd I would say it was by far the best film I saw at the London Film Fest last year.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 07, 2008 9:42:30 AM CST

    Wow, I will have to check out Bank Job now

    by nomoredirtyjokespleaseweareyanks

    Not for Statham, I gave up on him after WAR. But if Donaldson called the shots I'm there. Who knows, I may even like Statham again(BTW I used to think he was great in Lock, Stock and in Snatch. What the fuck happened.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 07, 2008 9:43:57 AM CST

    Actually I still like Statham in both those flicks.

    by nomoredirtyjokespleaseweareyanks

    Donaldson Rules. WHOOOOOO!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 07, 2008 9:56:20 AM CST

    Statham is garbage.

    by thrillho77

    The guy has no range - and I know he shouldn't because he's an action hero, but he delivers those one liners with ZERO charisma. He always has the same damn intonation in his voice and stupid look on his face. I can't watch a movie where he is the main character anymore because he irks me so much. I don't get the love - he's just not a great action star! And that seems to be an unpopular opinion! He makes shitty movies, what can I say?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 07, 2008 9:58:33 AM CST

    Save the Blue-eyed girl...!

    by superduper3000

    Or hell, save the green-eyed girl! When's the last time we got so see someone saving a hotness with yummy brown-eyes?


    Oh that's right, Duran Duran's "Hungry Life the Wolf!" Respect!!


    Watchmen Cast Pix!!

    http://tinyurl.com/384o6a

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 07, 2008 10:08:41 AM CST

    No white heroes allowed??

    by andre the frog

    Ok fine, next time the Africans can clean up their own mess.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 07, 2008 10:17:05 AM CST

    Re: No white heroes allowed??

    by flying spaghetti monster

    What the hell are you talking about?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 07, 2008 10:19:40 AM CST

    Emerich...

    by matdgz

    The dude should just stop making films. He'd make a good second unit director - he has an eye for pretty exciting action sequences. But as far as ACTUAL STORY is concerned, its waaaay beyond him. Stargate was a decent film, the script wasn't amazing but its by far the best film he's done. Well, either that or Universal Soldier ;-)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 07, 2008 10:25:14 AM CST

    Stargate sucked because.

    by andre the frog

    They actually had to learn the LANGUAGE in the other dimension. what a freakin' bore that is.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 07, 2008 10:30:56 AM CST

    10K BC? Jesus created the U.S. just 6K yrs ago!

    by baron karza

    Dont make nun gad-dum sense.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 07, 2008 10:32:19 AM CST

    People who cry racism about 10000 BC...

    by phimseto

    ...took too much Critical Race Theory in college. Seriously, to those people, instead of everything becoming a tootsie roll pop, it becomes the shadow of The Man keeping them down.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 07, 2008 11:09:03 AM CST

    Does anyone know,

    by stevie grant

    what that creepy, pinkish, mutant-looking person in the 10,000 BC trailer is? He reminded of that episode of the Venture Brothers where the boys' clones are released from the vats before they were done.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 07, 2008 11:21:02 AM CST

    Amy Adams

    by greyspecter

    quite the fox. Delicious.
    Nice to see the leftist Roland's true view of race relations.
    Bank job should feed my hankerin' for a good old fashioned caper flick. Topkapi and the Sting are the best, haven't had a good one since Ocean's 11.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 07, 2008 11:25:54 AM CST

    Good stuff Capone

    by darth thoth

    You're always on point.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 07, 2008 1:26:09 PM CST

    they are called moa's i think

    by bmacsmith

    big scary birds.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 07, 2008 2:05:44 PM CST

    Emmerich as Director

    by halloween68

    Maybe now people will realize upon further examining his film catalog and will join in saying along with me, "Hey, this Roland Emmerich guy sucks balls." I've been saying that ever since laid eyes on ID4 for the first time that opening week so many days ago. People have kinda warmed up to the idea over the years. I dunno ... maybe some people have to see it 2 or 3 times to realize how blatantly stupid and lazy that film is. (Sorta how people are starting to come around with SCREAM, which I also declared horror for dipsh*ts when it came out.) Hopefully this will be the last straw, and the film will come off of everybodies "classic" scifi movie list, and so we won't have to witness it being run back to back to back to back on TNT's 4th of July movie marathon every year. Roland Emmerich stop making movies. You are giving Uwe Boll hope.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 07, 2008 2:11:11 PM CST

    ZZZZ

    by skywalkerfamily

    Where's the 100 Semi Pro reviews?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 07, 2008 2:30:58 PM CST

    Emmerich's Films

    by mattmanreturns

    The Patriot and Stargate still hold up well. I loved Independence Day when I first saw it, but I was young and stupid. Day After Tomorrow plays like an effects real, and it sucks whenever the "characters" open their mouths. I have a feeling 10,000 BC is the same thing.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 07, 2008 2:59:20 PM CST

    The birds...

    by twindaggerturkey

    They are diatrymas or phororhacos, I think. They are a real thing. They did not co-exist with humans, though, let alone Egyptians.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 07, 2008 3:03:26 PM CST

    Coppers in Pettigrew! (Question for Capone)

    by pervhoeven

    I know its a bit shallow but i am! Anyways...I'm one of the police arresting a certian someone in the film. (Club scene) You see much of me?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 07, 2008 3:18:55 PM CST

    Uh, Gollum looked pretty seamless

    by skywalkerfamily

    So did Watto, the Jurassic Park dinos, etc. It's all just opinion. We wouldn't even have Jurassic Park if we're still in the physical FX era.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 07, 2008 3:40:41 PM CST

    How dare you speak ill of Handsome Rob!

    by thebearovingian

    Handsome Rob went back to London town and pulled off The British Job. Maybe Statham really wishes he was a gangster/criminal/thief?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 07, 2008 4:01:30 PM CST

    Gollum looked like shit

    by i dunno

    So did that fucking troll from the first LOTR film.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 07, 2008 4:09:29 PM CST

    Statham....

    by pumaman

    Thank God he won't be using his fake 'American' accent in the Bank Job because its fucking terrible. Other than that , I think most of his films are great.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 07, 2008 4:20:48 PM CST

    if you thought Gollum looked like shit i have nothing

    by bmacsmith

    more to say to you. You are a fucktard. He was a breakthrough. CG characters have definately arrived, and they can look fucking great, as Gollum proved. Of course, it can look like absolute shit (I am Legend), but it depends on the artiists involved. And in most cases, some combination of CG and makeup seems to work best.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 07, 2008 4:58:54 PM CST

    Most of the LOTR creatures were models scanned

    by skywalkerfamily

    into the computer. Why can't people figure this out?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 07, 2008 9:33:43 PM CST

    wow, 10000 bc was actually worse than i thought

    by bmacsmith

    how bland. bored throughout. completely devoid of anything original or entertaining. bravo!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 07, 2008 11:50:28 PM CST

    I didn't mind I am Legend but the cgi was terrible

    by nomoredirtyjokespleaseweareyanks

    Gollum looks way better than what was achieved in Legend. If 'I dunno' really believes gollum looks bad he really is deluded.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 08, 2008 12:50:24 AM CST

    Amy Adams

    by bizarrojerry

    I would do things to Miss Adams that would seem sort of wrong to do to someone so sweet and adorable.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 08, 2008 6:36:16 AM CST

    I think the major problem

    by nabster

    isn't the quality, but the fact its apparently boring. I thought the Patriot was his most sincere attempet to make a good movie, which almost makes it his least watchable, as he is completely out of his depth in terms of quality film making.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 08, 2008 7:53:51 AM CST

    Gollum looked bad because he had no weight

    by i dunno

    It was the same with King Kong. When they close upped on his face he looked fine. When he actually stomped around and tried to react to his environment he looked like every other CGI creature.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 08, 2008 9:44:12 AM CST

    CGI with weight.....

    by w3bzpinn3r

    Jurassic Park 1 & 2 looked great. JP3 with it's "Enhanced physics" looked crappy.

    Transformers CGI looked great. The robots' feet sank into the ground with every step.

    And, of course, Pirates of the Caribbean 1, 2, and 3 were FANTASTIC CGI. The fish people looked fantastic, as did the undead pirates.

    Also, look at the dragon in Harry Potter 4 - looked great and had a physical weight to it too. It had to "work" to get it's bulk off the ground to fly.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 08, 2008 10:10:51 AM CST

    True, there are examples of good CGI

    by i dunno

    Pirates being one of them. Even some shots in King Kong look good. The technology's there to do it right so it must be a matter of time and budget. It's like they blew their wad making Kong's face look good in closeup, so the brontosaurs look like they were rendered on a Commodore 64.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 08, 2008 3:16:22 PM CST

    Yoda acted better than Hayden

    by skywalkerfamily

    It's a sad day when your CG creature acts better than flesh and blood.

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback