Logo

Cool News

Sundance ’08! A Brief Reaction To THE MYSTERIES OF PITTSBURGH!

Published at:  Jan 21, 2008 5:58:37 AM CST

Hey, everyone. ”Moriarty” here.

I like Chabon, but I don't think he writes books that are particularly well-suited to screenplay adaptation. I don't think he thinks in terms of movies. He's a novelist... and that's as it should be. He doesn't write his books thinking about the eventual Hollywood sale... or at least, that's not how his books feel to me.

Anyway... did this attempt to bring this early book of his to life work? Here's our first answer from Sundance:



Well, if you're looking for reviews... Caught the Rawson Marshall Thurber (Dodgeball) directed, Mysteries of Pittsburgh tonight. Hm.

Bland. Unfortunately bland. The cast is great - except for the lead (kind of a problem). It was introduced as a "coming of age" story and it deals with a young man's last summer before he commits to a boring/legit job that his "gangster" father has set up for him. It's based on a novel by pulitzer prize winning Michael Chabon and here's the thing: there was nothing in this movie that wasn't familiar. Here's the young naive kid who's drawn to danger in the form of a couple - sexy Sienna Miller and Peter Sarsgaard: her beauty, his recklessness/freedom. Pretty sure he's gonna learn a lesson. Pretty sure there's gonna be some violence, sex, love and loss before that lesson's learned. But it's all been done before - and better (Something Wild, for instance. Almost Famous. Or that other movie where the young guy is drawn to the bad-boy-self-destructive-mentor...).

Bottom line - though competently directed, the story was unengaging. Keep the faith in Thurber and most of the actors, but check this flick out only if you're hardcore for any of 'em.

If you use this call me - The Seeds.


    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Jan 21, 2008 5:58:28 AM CST

    big deal

    by internet thug

    never heard of it

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 21, 2008 6:18:31 AM CST

    Dodgeball director and Chabon?!

    by elab49

    Hardly a match made in heaven - I know where I'd place the blame. Curtis Hanson did a wonderful job with Wonder Boys so no point blaming the source material here - just its handling.

    BTW - boasting about ignorance. Is that the norm?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 21, 2008 8:15:26 AM CST

    Chabonnnnn muthafucka!

    by lordporkington

    Dig ma bad self. That is all.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 21, 2008 8:24:28 AM CST

    Pittsburgh Sucks!

    by nice marmot

    Go Browns!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 21, 2008 8:40:04 AM CST

    Fuck yeah, Go Browns!

    by rbatty024

  • Jan 21, 2008 8:45:54 AM CST

    I'm a huge Chabon fan, it's a shame the movie sucks.

    by rbatty024

    The book is a great first effort by him. While it does have its problems as far as plot (the gangster elements seem shoehorned in), you can tell he was a great prose writer from the beginning. When are we gonna get Kavalier and Clay?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 21, 2008 9:22:54 AM CST

    That other movie

    by terrymalloy

    What is he talking about? That could be a lot of movies.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 21, 2008 10:13:32 AM CST

    Not the best novel to adapt.

    by catvutt

    Kavalier and Clay could be an incredible film in the right hands. Would've been great in Coppola's hands 15-20 years ago. Not sure who I'd want to do it now.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 21, 2008 10:48:08 AM CST

    I am from Pittsburgh

    by tompiltoff

    That is all.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 21, 2008 12:19:52 PM CST

    I think the other movie is Karate Kid 3.

    by knuckleduster

    And Chabon rules! "You fight like Anne Rice".

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 21, 2008 1:20:32 PM CST

    Wonder Boys was fantastic!

    by bass ackwards

    Wonder Boys the novel and the movie were both excellent, there's no reason Mysteries of Pittsburgh shouldn't/couldn't be either. And I actually thought, of Chabon's stuff, this novel would be the "easiest" to adapt (not to suggest there's anything easy about the process), Kavalier and Clay strikes me as damn near impossible.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 21, 2008 2:30:53 PM CST

    It's the teller, not the tale.

    by genericgeek

    The problem with book adaptations is that what works on paper is usually the "voice" of the writer, even if the story isn't that new or interesting. But, sadly, that "voice" is the first thing out of the window when it's adapted to film. Chabon is truly an excellent writer, and that's why his books are so good. But distill the plot into a 110 page screenplay and it'll probably end up dull.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 21, 2008 2:55:27 PM CST

    Moriarty...

    by captain happy

    "...I don't think he writes books that are particularly well-suited to screenplay adaptation..." - What? What about WONDER BOYS? A great film. A GREAT adaptation. Casting. Direction. Location. Pitch perfect.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 21, 2008 5:09:00 PM CST

    kavalier and clay

    by prettynursepoppy

    I agree with Back Asswards. How on earth are they going to get K & C on the screen? The Golem scene alone could be a whole movie (and I suspect the Golem is completely abandoned in the finished script). Most problematic is probably the stuff that takes place in Antarctica, which for my money is the best stuff in the book. Except... nothing happens. It's all tension and release and internal dialogue.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 21, 2008 5:26:27 PM CST

    I agree that the Antartica scenes would be the hardest...

    by rbatty024

    to pull off. The fact that the movie takes place over such a long period of time is tricky in film. The book doesn't have the basic three acts that a film often requires. I read somewhere that they were thinking of including the Antarctica scenes in comic book form, which sounded pretty cool.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 21, 2008 5:43:18 PM CST

    That's my fucking car, motherfucker

    by dkt

    Wonder Boys ruled. It gets harder and harder to imagine a Kavalier and Clay movie. I'm not saying it can't be done, but it gets harder and harder to imagine. Chabon is a great novelist. I just got "The Gentlemen of the Road" for Christmas, which looks pretty cool. I've heard great things about the Yiddish Policeman's Union, too.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 21, 2008 10:10:12 PM CST

    Disagree with The Seed's inpression

    by skinjob69

    Saw the morning show of Pittsburg today, and my reaction was completely different from the above. Great performances (especially by Saarsgard and Nolte) and a very polished production. I think the screenplay was significantly different from the book (which the director mentioned in the Q&A afterward), but the main details and overall tone were preserved. Some minor flaws, but despite these my friend and I were both greatly moved by the story- and I feel the audience responded enthusiastically in general. Definitely a great nostalgia piece and coming of age story. I'm really looking forward to seeing this one again when it goes to wide release. Would also like to hear what Quint and Rav have to say about it as well.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 22, 2008 12:35:57 AM CST

    Pittsburgh has Primanti Bros

    by horace cox

    All you need to know about Da' Burgh is that the city is the home of Primanti Bros sandwiches and they fucking kick all kinds of ass. http://www.primantibros.com

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 22, 2008 2:16:01 AM CST

    Didn't Miller cause a controversy

    by dingbatty

    after she mouthed off about Pittsburgh?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 22, 2008 2:16:47 AM CST

    And, why aren't we getting Kavalier & Clay

    by dingbatty

    before this?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 22, 2008 7:40:41 AM CST

    Kavalier & Clay as a movie

    by superfleish76

    would probably end up focusing on the history of comic books told through the two boys experiences. A lot of the other cool stuff would be shortened or completely dropped. Not that it couldn't be a great movie, but there is no way you can adapt that book straight to the screen.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 22, 2008 9:46:18 AM CST

    Just funny

    by mcr07376

    It seems the positive reviews the film is getting always seems to be from those who haven't read the book and use Thurber's defense-Chabon approved the changes. As for Kavalier and Clay, considering who is supposed to be involved-Stephen Daldry and Tobey Maguire-let it sit on the shelf until Chabon comes to his senses and lets more talented people get involved.

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback