Cool News
One Spy Sees DEFINITELY, MAYBE And Says “F&#K NO!”
Hey, everyone. ”Moriarty” here.
Did you see what I said when I introduced the review for IN THE NAME OF THE KING? Well, it applies here, too. This guy actually went and sat in a theater that was playing this film so that he could tell you about it and save you from ever having to duplicate the experience. Isn’t that worth a few minutes of your time? Talk about taking one for the team. Everyone knows January and February are when you really earn your battle scars as a film critic...
Hey Moriarty,
AICN has killed a lot of downtime at the office for me over the years and I have decided to repay the favor with a review of...wait for it...the new Ryan Reynold's romantic comedy "Definitely, Maybe"! You are welcome!!!
I caught an advanced screening of this last night at the Metreon in San Francisco and let me start by saying this movie is a steaming pile of monkey crap. Romantic comedies are not generally my favorite movies but I'll admit that I enjoyed "Notting Hill" and "Love Actually", so naturally when I saw that "Definitley, Maybe" was made by the same people I had a little confidence that it wouldn't totally suck-ass. I was wrong.
The movie is about a guy (Reynolds) who is telling his daughter (Abigail Breslin) the tale of how he ended up with her mother who could be one of three ladies in his past (played by the delicious Elizabeth Banks, and Rachel Weisz, and Isla Fisher). The fact that Reynold's and the mystery mom are divorced and the daughter is 10 years old says to me that 1) the fact that daughter is just now curious about her parents history indicates that daughter didn't really give a rip about mommy for the past 10 years, or 2) for the sake of the movie it's just a lot cuter coming from a 10 year old than some 4 year old who can't complete sentences like "daddy, what's a threesome?". But I digress.
So Reynolds tells his story of the three women to his daughter so she can wager a guess as to who her mommy might be. The first real problem with the movie is that the three women all appear very perfect initially but then are revealed to have big flaws. Predictiable, typical, romantic comedy flaws that required zero effort on the part of writer/director Adam Brooks. If you haven't guessed them here goes:
Woman 1: flaw - bi-sexual (and flaw meaning "causes problem for protagonist", not a flaw that she likes ladies)
Woman 2: flaw - In love with sexigenarian professor
Woman 3: flaw - crazy whore
The women's character flaws are all delivered like clockwork, about 10 minutes after they are introduced and all seems well, like we're really going to think "Yay, Ryan Reynolds has FINALLY found true love...*sigh*...what could possibly go wrong now?". The worst moment in the film is when Reynolds confesses to Woman 3: Crazy Whore that he loves her (don't worry, not a spoiler) and she responds by saying "Why didn't you tell me this when you were successful?" and breaks his heart. The movie then has the balls to ask us to like her later in the film never making amends for Crazy Whore's superficial heart breaking earlier on (note: when she does like him later he is successful again, what does this say about their relationship?). Through the course of the movie the three women come and go from his life so many times we never give a damn who he ends up with we just want the indecison to finally stop. Pick one you dumb bastard!
My other big problem is the unecessary politcal angle the movie takes for absoultely no reason. In the present Reynold's character works in advertising but in his back story he is an idealistic young man working hard for the Clinton campaign in '92. This makes way for some long-winded diatribes on the Clinton presidency which have no bearing on the story at hand. I get the feeling that Adam Brooks simply wanted a soap box to rattle off his own political agenda, and that's fine if this were a movie about the Clinton presidency, but it's not, it's a shitty romantic comedy, stick to it.
I have to admit I like Ryan Reynolds in certain things but his acting can be so hamfisted at times. His punch lines are delivered like a poor man's Ace Ventura, which works in things like "Van WIlder" and "Just Friends" but not in this. The other problem is that this movie managed to put together a great cast, among them Elizabeth Banks (love), Rachel Weisz (is she only getting roles in things like this and Fred Claus? They're below her), KEVIN KLINE (between this and The Pink Panther he is really slumming it these days), and poor Abigail Breslin, who does her job and makes some cute moments out of virtually nothing, but can't save this flaming turd. It's a shame to see so much talent squandered on such one dimensional, forgettable characters.
I'm tired of the studios popping a squat over the multiplex and squeezing out a formulaic piece of celluloid like this. I suppose I should add that the movie screened really well, which is either a sad commentary on the expectations of audiences today or San Francisco just loves tepid romantic comedy wank.
If you use this call me FIREBAUM.
AICN has killed a lot of downtime at the office for me over the years and I have decided to repay the favor with a review of...wait for it...the new Ryan Reynold's romantic comedy "Definitely, Maybe"! You are welcome!!!
I caught an advanced screening of this last night at the Metreon in San Francisco and let me start by saying this movie is a steaming pile of monkey crap. Romantic comedies are not generally my favorite movies but I'll admit that I enjoyed "Notting Hill" and "Love Actually", so naturally when I saw that "Definitley, Maybe" was made by the same people I had a little confidence that it wouldn't totally suck-ass. I was wrong.
The movie is about a guy (Reynolds) who is telling his daughter (Abigail Breslin) the tale of how he ended up with her mother who could be one of three ladies in his past (played by the delicious Elizabeth Banks, and Rachel Weisz, and Isla Fisher). The fact that Reynold's and the mystery mom are divorced and the daughter is 10 years old says to me that 1) the fact that daughter is just now curious about her parents history indicates that daughter didn't really give a rip about mommy for the past 10 years, or 2) for the sake of the movie it's just a lot cuter coming from a 10 year old than some 4 year old who can't complete sentences like "daddy, what's a threesome?". But I digress.
So Reynolds tells his story of the three women to his daughter so she can wager a guess as to who her mommy might be. The first real problem with the movie is that the three women all appear very perfect initially but then are revealed to have big flaws. Predictiable, typical, romantic comedy flaws that required zero effort on the part of writer/director Adam Brooks. If you haven't guessed them here goes:
Woman 1: flaw - bi-sexual (and flaw meaning "causes problem for protagonist", not a flaw that she likes ladies)
Woman 2: flaw - In love with sexigenarian professor
Woman 3: flaw - crazy whore
The women's character flaws are all delivered like clockwork, about 10 minutes after they are introduced and all seems well, like we're really going to think "Yay, Ryan Reynolds has FINALLY found true love...*sigh*...what could possibly go wrong now?". The worst moment in the film is when Reynolds confesses to Woman 3: Crazy Whore that he loves her (don't worry, not a spoiler) and she responds by saying "Why didn't you tell me this when you were successful?" and breaks his heart. The movie then has the balls to ask us to like her later in the film never making amends for Crazy Whore's superficial heart breaking earlier on (note: when she does like him later he is successful again, what does this say about their relationship?). Through the course of the movie the three women come and go from his life so many times we never give a damn who he ends up with we just want the indecison to finally stop. Pick one you dumb bastard!
My other big problem is the unecessary politcal angle the movie takes for absoultely no reason. In the present Reynold's character works in advertising but in his back story he is an idealistic young man working hard for the Clinton campaign in '92. This makes way for some long-winded diatribes on the Clinton presidency which have no bearing on the story at hand. I get the feeling that Adam Brooks simply wanted a soap box to rattle off his own political agenda, and that's fine if this were a movie about the Clinton presidency, but it's not, it's a shitty romantic comedy, stick to it.
I have to admit I like Ryan Reynolds in certain things but his acting can be so hamfisted at times. His punch lines are delivered like a poor man's Ace Ventura, which works in things like "Van WIlder" and "Just Friends" but not in this. The other problem is that this movie managed to put together a great cast, among them Elizabeth Banks (love), Rachel Weisz (is she only getting roles in things like this and Fred Claus? They're below her), KEVIN KLINE (between this and The Pink Panther he is really slumming it these days), and poor Abigail Breslin, who does her job and makes some cute moments out of virtually nothing, but can't save this flaming turd. It's a shame to see so much talent squandered on such one dimensional, forgettable characters.
I'm tired of the studios popping a squat over the multiplex and squeezing out a formulaic piece of celluloid like this. I suppose I should add that the movie screened really well, which is either a sad commentary on the expectations of audiences today or San Francisco just loves tepid romantic comedy wank.
If you use this call me FIREBAUM.
-
+ Expand All
-
and first time posting ever.
-
Third, and pointlessly thrilled
-
And with an article like this, I seriously doubt anyone will be beating the doors down to post...
-
i will skip this one, good review "not just it sucked"
-
Just tell me so that I definitely don't have to see it.
-
Isla Fisher is HAWT.
-
How dare you bash Just Friends??!! I ought to break your face on Ryan Reynolds's rock hard abs!
-
nothing sexier than a woman wearing a see-thru tanktop and no bra. google "elizabeth banks GQ" for evidence.
-
I go to terrible films all the time just to warn my friends and the rest of you all. I saw this back in October. It's just as bad as Firebaum says it is. You can check my original review out here http://www.aintitcool.com/node/34504 although Firebaum pretty much says it all.
-
Christ I read through the entire review ON THE EDGE OF MY CHAIR with suspense on finding out just which flawed-woman he picked as his wife! WHY WOULD YOU DO THAT TO A MAN!? SPILL THE BEANS!
-
WHOA! Dose that bring back some memories!
-
I mean, why does he keep getting lead roles in films? He has no charm, no charisma, he's a less-than-middling actor, all his films tank - what gives here? Why would a studio think anyone would want to see this film? Granted, Cook is the current nadir when measuring the talent and bankability of today's male "film stars," but Reynolds is running a close second. Bleh.
-
Dammit! I'm going to bed.
-
No one's opinion is worth that much to me that it would ever stop me from watching a movie and making up my own mind. Opinions are interesting and all, but they should never replace making up one's own mind. *my* opinion anyway.
-
Jan 11, 2008 4:34:40 AM CST
I saw the trailer for this and looked over at my girl
by s0nicdeathmonkey
and said, "that looks cute"because I sort of figured that she would want me to. She responded, "are you fucking retarded?" And I suddenly remembered why she's the best girlfriend I've ever had.
-
Also high up on that list is, she never demands to see horrible films. She sat through Stone Cold and never made me do penance for it. She was pleased as peach to go see There Will Be Blood and even enjoys the Todd Solondz kick I've been on of late. And too, she's also smart and beautiful and she comes to my dorm room to do my laundry even if I'm on class. I donno why she hasn't realized that she can do better.
-
typo.
-
Peep The Nines when the DVD comes out later this month. Bafflingly good.
-
have a 12" tongue, or you have a serious way with words. If you decide (for some insane reason) to dump her, point her in this direction dude, she sounds like a peach!
-
...and replace her with Amanda Peet, and that's my perfect cast.
-
the line was HUGE, so I passed because I was afraid I wouldn't get into the free screening. I kinda regret it, but not because I thought the movie looked good, but because I love Rachel Weisz, and I was hoping AICN might publish my review. dangit, I might have had a shot! I'm 2 for 3 on getting stuff up on here. they published my Science of Sleep review, and I got to be a part of the Transformers circlejerk (mine was, I think, the only unqualified negative review), but they passed on my advanced word on Flyboys. I was hoping I could have saved at leaset 10 or 15 people from seeing that pile of dung.oh well, rambling over. Seacrest out.
-
And I have a film in competition in the Santa Barbara International Film Festival in a few weeks...as for the others, I can neither confirm nor deny your assertion. And yes, she is a real peach.
-
And I have a film in competition in the Santa Barbara International Film Festival in a few weeks...as for the others, I can neither confirm nor deny your assertion. And yes, she is a real peach.
-
Never seen the show but doesn't the premise of this movie sound vaguely like that show; father tells his kids about how he met their mother, cut to flashbacks where you see him meeting a number of different women frequently and as of yet, you don't know which one he married.
-
Jan 13, 2008 12:13:35 PM CST
yeah...never seen that show, but I think you're right.
by s0nicdeathmonkey
that show is also written and produced by the creators of CLOOOOOOOOOOOONE HIGH USA.
Readers Talkback
User Login
Top Talkbacks
- Whitney Houston 1963 - 2012 -- 325 total posts 322 posts
- New JUDGE DREDD post production footage pops up -- 106 total posts 106 posts
- HANNA's Saoirse Ronan to boss around seven little people -- 63 total posts 60 posts
- Does ‘SNL’ Rhyme With ‘Deschanel’?? Learn Which SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE Vet Hosts After Sexy Zooey!! -- 74 total posts 58 posts
- There's a STAR TREK video game that is going to lead into JJ's STAR TREK 2 apparently... -- 159 total posts 51 posts
- If the Behind the Scenes Pics of the Day drops her pen, pick it up, but don’t look at her legs or else it will be on your record. -- 47 total posts 41 posts
- AVENGERS enemy revealed as pink boardgame pieces... You might suffer some form of elation... SPOILERS!!! -- 161 total posts 34 posts
- To Commemorate The 3D Release Of STAR WARS EPISODE I: THE PHANTOM MENACE, George Lucas Wants You To Know...Greedo Shoots First!! -- 488 total posts 33 posts
- Friday Brings SWEEPS DAY NINE!! Gab Here About Tonight’s FRINGE!! Plus Einstein on TIM, Wiig On PORTLANDIA, MAHER, CLONE, GIFTED, GRIMM, SPARTACUS, SUPERNATURAL, GOLD RUSH And More!! -- 121 total posts 23 posts
- Here's The Red Band Trailer For Drafthouse Films' THE FP! -- 70 total posts 20 posts