Logo

Cool News

Moriarty Trips Into Francis Coppola’s YOUTH WITHOUT YOUTH!

Published at:  Dec 14, 2007 7:41:26 AM CST

Hey, everyone. “Moriarty” here.

This one almost defies criticism. There is little doubt looking at it that Francis Ford Coppola has made precisely the film he set out to make. It’s every bit as technically dazzling and rich and forward-thinking as TUCKER or DRACULA were when he made those. I know it’s not particularly hip to like Coppola these days, but I am a fan of much of his career, and particularly his go-for-broke attitude that has caused him to implode several times, but which has also led to some truly spectacular highs over the course of his filmography.

Describing the story to the film is next to impossible. You could summarize all the events that take place in the movie, but that really wouldn’t convey the experience. This is almost pure cinema, Coppola working with his best collaborators to create this barrage of sound and image and emotion that certainly packs some sort of cumulative punch.

Mircea Eliade’s novella is definitely fully present in the film that Coppola made, and to some extent, the way Eliade plays with time and narrative and form verbally dictates the way Coppola tries to handle the same ideas visually. The film opens in Romania in 1938, where Dominic Matei (Tim Roth) has a terrible dream before setting out for Bucharest, where he plans to kill himself. Before he can, though, he is struck by lightning.

Keep in mind... Dominic is 70 years old, a man embittered by the many disappointments and sorrows of his life. He’s haunted by memories of Laura (Alexandra Maria Lara), his first love, and by the fact that he has never been able to find the time to complete his life-long study of the evolution of human language.

And when he is struck by lightning, he is fried to a crisp, enough voltage run through him to kill anyone. It’s a spectacular moment, and Coppola makes sure you aren’t confused about how traumatic an event it is. This is the lightning strike to end all lightning strikes.

And somehow, Dominic survives. More than that, though, he actually begins to age backwards. He begins to regenerate, and very quickly, he looks like a man half his age. He goes through a remarkable transformation as his teeth fall out of his head, pushed away as new teeth erupt. His case becomes a sensation as he works with a doctor (Bruno Ganz) to figure out what’s happened to him. Unfortunately, with war erupting around Europe, he draws the wrong kind of attention and finds himself on Adolf Hitler’s “to acquire” list. As strange as the film is up to this point, it’s the introduction of Dominic’s exact double as a sort of devil-on-his-shoulder that marks the moment where the film spins off into near-lunacy.

I think Coppola is obviously dealing with ideas of mortality and fate and thinking about some of the big questions, like what we are supposed to do with our time in this world, and what we leave behind as our legacy when we go. When Dominic gets a second chance of sorts with Laura, things begin to get really intense, and she becomes part of his research. Lara gives one hell of a dedicated performance, and although I haven’t seen her work in CONTROL, I’d say it’s safe to assume this is the year she really made her first big mark on cinema. This is assured, adult work, and in a way, this struck me as PEGGY SUE GOT MARRIED by way of ALTERED STATES, a love story about someone pursuing someone else into their work that is dangerous on a fundamental personality level, determined to save them. I’m sort of a sucker for this kind of story. Last year’s THE FOUNTAIN also fits this loose template, and I’m sure you’ll read many comparisons between Coppola’s film and Aronofksy’s. I think the difference is clarity. Aronofsky’s movie last year was precise, with really only one thing on its mind. YOUTH WITHOUT YOUTH is spilling over with ideas, and it’s sort of like a conversation with someone who can’t hold one train of thought. It’s a young man’s movie with an old master’s technique, which is sort of what Coppola seems to have set out to accomplish. On that level, he’s tapped back into the simple joys of filmmaking in a very direct way.

The film wears out its welcome long before it makes its final points, and I think Coppola could have had something really special if he’d been brutal with what he shot. This is not a case of more-is-more. I dearly love the excess of APOCALYPSE NOW, but this film feels like a short story stretched too thin. It makes its points early, then makes them repeatedly. By the time it finally reaches its climax, there are some sequences of real lyrical power, but they feel unconnected... great scenes that aren’t quite earned. When the last inevitable rose finally appears, the film this reminds me most of in Coppola’s filmography turns out to be RUMBLE FISH. I suspect I’ll revisit this one because I’ll want to look at how Walter Murch cut certain sequences, or I’ll want to see some aspect of Calin Papura’s production design again, or I’ll want to soak up a bit of Osvaldo Golijov’s sweeping score in context. Coppola’s collaborators all bring their very best work to the table, and the result is certainly a high-end piece of craftsmanship.

This may be as spectacular a miss as SOUTHLAND TALES, but to me, this is a playful, loose and limber mistake, a film that seems to have been made without calculation. There’s something so generous about how much Coppola has poured into the film that it seems ungracious to refuse to at least enjoy it once. You may well hate YOUTH WITHOUT YOUTH when you see it, but I guarantee you won’t forget it.





Drew McWeeny, Los Angeles



    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Dec 14, 2007 7:48:17 AM CST

    whoooo, first

    by high fidelity

    i know it's retarded, but for some reason it feels good. That being said, i am really excited to see this movie. a spectacular failure is always better than a decent push-no-boundaries film. at least in my book

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 14, 2007 8:09:10 AM CST

    Rumblefish is one of my favourite movies

    by bobo_vision

    But I suspect Youth without Youth will be one of my least favourites. Nice review, Moriarty.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 14, 2007 8:25:46 AM CST

    PEGGY SUE HITLER GOT MARRIED

    by pound sand

    This movie sounds like it was put together by FFC's massive ego.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 14, 2007 9:05:49 AM CST

    Wow Mori if you can mention this in the same breath

    by nomoredirtyjokespleaseweareyanks

    as Dracula and Tucker, I'm so fuckin there. Dracula actually left me shaking with adrenalin as I walked out of the theatre. It was always one of my favorite books and to see it created so exquisitely was breathtaking. No other filmmaker has elicited that response from me.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 14, 2007 10:01:02 AM CST

    "Osvaldo Golijov’s sweeping score"

    by strabo

    Goddammit, Mori! Give me more! Golijov is the best thing to happen to the classical music world in quite some time. I absolutely adore Ainadamar and Oceana.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 14, 2007 12:58:45 PM CST

    "Cool" to Like Coppola

    by thomasservo

    I don't care whether or not it's cool to like FFC right now-- he's still the man who made Godfather II. He wins a free pass for life.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 14, 2007 1:37:55 PM CST

    hmm

    by s0nicdeathmonkey

    Will this get a wide release? I want to know as little as possible before I see it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 14, 2007 2:08:43 PM CST

    Sounds really interesting...

    by tourist

    ...Until he mentioned The Fountain, which was a drab, dull, restrained, dim pile of poo. Hopefully this film has the balls to let loose with something inspired, unlike aronofskys snooze fest. Then again, it could just be a big old mess. That said, I fucking love Rumble Fish.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 14, 2007 3:12:55 PM CST

    The Tourist is a

    by runfoodrun

    drab, dull, restrained, dim pile of poo and a snoozefest.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 14, 2007 3:55:58 PM CST

    I'm very sick of...

    by cagliostro

    Supposed critics acting like they are familiar with source material from movies when all they really do is quickly look up wikipedia references to said material from books most of our parents probably never read. That instant scholar shit don't play and even if I'd read said material, unless I was ready to front, I'd read the shit and be ready to quote. All of a sudden everyone has seen Farewell Uncle Tom and Read I am Legend. I can't wait till they start putting out Bruce Dickinson's Aleister Crowley movie. Every Rise of the Silver Surfer fan will be saying "Do what thou wilt". Then again, that might not be a bad thing.
    Love is the law!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 14, 2007 4:40:31 PM CST

    Jack 2

    by 2utah2

    Didn't Coopola cover the whole "abnormal" aging thing with his Robin Williams masterpiece?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 14, 2007 7:00:27 PM CST

    I loved The Fountain

    by cherryvalance

    and I love FFC, even after what he did to 'The Outsiders' score. But I haven't been hip since, well, ever. And since you threw 'Altered States' in there, I can't see how I won't like it. Sounds like I should love it.

    btw, did he ever get his stuff back?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 14, 2007 10:52:12 PM CST

    Zoetrope

    by laszlo vilsay

    Terrific review, Drew. I'm a great admirer of Coppola as well, and it occurs to me that the last time the man had a film in distribution, a lot of people hadn't been made aware of the Internet. To say he's been out of the zeitgeist for a while would be an understatement. Despite the fact that Coppola has made bad movies, he was building a movie studio, theatre group, radio network, magazine - creative empire - while many of his contemporaries were snorting coke in Malibu. Then at the very least you have to say he made three of the greatest films of all time, while continuing to work and experiment with the medium. If "Youth Without Youth" is as unique as "Dracula" or "Tucker", I'm excited to check it out.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 14, 2007 11:25:04 PM CST

    Can't wait to see it.

    by tattooedbillionaire

    I've never seen all of Tucker, though. I know I've seen parts of it, but for whatever reasosns, not the whole thing.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 14, 2007 11:32:43 PM CST

    score

    by biscuit turner

    Haven't seen the movie, but the score is pretty amazing. I picked up the DG recording earlier this week and can't stop listening. There's a lot of Bernard Herrmann in addition to Golijov's usual influences. I'm curious about Jonny Greenwood's "There Will Be Blood" work, but right now Golijov's work is the best I've heard this year.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 15, 2007 4:29:33 PM CST

    Never got to see Southland Tales

    by scrivener

    I got robbed there. The damn movie just never opened. IMDB says it did - but it didn't. That fucking pisses me off, too. I don't care if it's "miss" or "flawed" or "disappointing"... I want to fucking see it, goddammit. If the same thing happens to this and "There Will Be Blood", I'm going to fucking kill someone.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 15, 2007 11:51:31 PM CST

    WHAT'S THIS GOT TO DO WITH BOURNE 4?!

    by ch0colatesyrup

    haha. this sounds really great to me. i thought the fountain was great but i wish we saw a 3 hour version instead, even though we would have had brad pitt instead of hugh jackamn.
    and i, too, wanted to see southland tales, despite all the horrible tales of it. but alas, it played near me for 5 days and didn't have a chance to get there in time. i believe there will be blood will be released (get it, ha ha haaa) wider then southland tales given that it's definately going to be up for at least best picture.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 16, 2007 1:26:06 PM CST

    Tim Roth

    by ragingfluff

    How come this man just doesn't get offered enough decent roles? He managed to hold his own on screen with Tupac, and he's always watchable, even when he appears in dross.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 16, 2007 5:26:41 PM CST

    wait a minute

    by palinode

    "This is assured, adult work, and in a way, this struck me as PEGGY SUE GOT MARRIED by way of ALTERED STATES, a love story about someone pursuing someone else into their work that is dangerous on a fundamental personality level, determined to save them. I’m sort of a sucker for this kind of story."

    I'm more of a sucker for sentences that make sense.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Part of me really wants to see it, but a deeper more animalistic part of my brain, my personal spider sense if you will, is warning not to see this movie. I'll probably wait for the fan edit alla The Phantom Edit. These old main stream director's are too arrogant to let criticism hone their craft. They're surrounded by fanboy yes men.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 18, 2007 10:59:31 AM CST

    EW gave it an "F"

    by fleshmachine

    I mean yeah it's EW..but still..an "F".

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback