Logo

Cool News

Annette Kellerman goes down on NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN!

Published at:  Oct 29, 2007 9:31:01 PM CDT

I feel incredibly lucky that I was able to attend an early screening of NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN, and I'm writing in to join those singing its praises. Like many of you, I am a long time fan of the Coen brothers, and I was greatly anticipating this latest effort. Unlike many of you, however, I was completely unaware that the film is based on the Cormac McCarthy novel of the same name. With this in hindsight, I'd first like to relieve any of you who fear another ALL THE PRETTY HORSES. There is no comparison. While that film frustrated and rambled, NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN enthralls and mesmerizes.

The story begins with a bang as a lone hunter in the brambles of the Texas desert discovers a drug deal gone bad- really bad- and decides it his good fortune when he recovers the case of cash left in the midst of the bloodbath. Soon enough, however, our antagonist, Llewelyn Moss, realizes that what seems too good to be true probably is. It turns out that he and everyone he turns to for help discover themselves on the hit list of a maniacal killer who is after the money
as well. Of course, for the audience this is where the fun begins as a colossal game of cat and mouse plays out across various Texas landscapes with equal parts of cunning intrigue and stunning violence. As the action takes place, we are also treated to the parallel story of the aging and all-knowing sheriff who unravels the case just a step behind us right up until the end where no one, including the audience and main characters, are ahead.

The performances in the film are incredible. As Llewelyn, Josh Brolin delivers just the right amount of smarts and swagger for a leading man on the run. His performance is wonderfully understated and realistic even while dodging figurative and literal bullets. Tommy Lee Jones in
the role of Ed Tom Bell embodies the old school charm and wit of the sheriff who is witness to the degradation of society. His ease with the character is a breath of fresh air and provides not only the sparse comic relief of the film, but the axis of the story as well. Then there's Javier Bardem as the psychotic Anton Chigurh. Words can't describe the raving look in his eyes as he picks off victim after victim without a hint of remorse. Chigurh is a mad man and Bardem portrays him with chilling intensity. Fantastic supporting performances by Kelly Macdonald, Woody Harrelson, and Stephen Root round out the spectacular ensemble cast.

Also worth mentioning is the number of smaller roles by relatively unknown players. As always, the Coens have done a wonderful job in utilizing a number of character actors that actually look like real people. There are very few faces with chiseled features and perfect smiles- no botox, hair plugs, or veneers here. These actors look like everyday people circa 1980 and its damn refreshing.

Perhaps the most enchanting character of the film, however, is the West Texas landscape itself. It seems the Coen brothers have written a sort of love letter to this oft-caricatured region of our country. Beautifully shot by cinematographer Roger Deakins, the vastness of the Texas desert and quaintness of the border towns provide the perfect backdrop and juxtaposition for such a sinister plot.

At its heart, the film is a simple morality tale. Although it is a story about greed and the evils that follow suit, it's not the kind of story that's tied up with a pretty bow at the end. There's a
strange satisfaction with not being completely satisfied by the end of the film. In other words, the film refuses to placate by Hollywood's rules of A-B-C storytelling. NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN follows no rules. It's gritty, it's real, and it's one of the most honest crime dramas
I've seen in a long time.

Until next time, Annette Kellerman.







    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Oct 29, 2007 9:31:31 PM CDT

    FIRST! However, I am not going down on anyone.

    by rogue_leader

    At least not on here.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 29, 2007 9:43:43 PM CDT

    sexist bastard headline writer

    by phast freddy

  • Oct 29, 2007 9:44:26 PM CDT

    Annette Kellerman was Grindhouse before Rose McGowan !

    by pound sand

    Well, it's not a machine gun leg, but the inspiration for Rose is clear from the cartoon rendering above.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 29, 2007 9:46:26 PM CDT

    hmm...I supect I'm gonna hate the ending too...

    by bmacsmith

    weird endings that don't tie up the story bug the hell out of me. Sorry, I guess I'm just a mindless Hollywood loving idiot. The last paragraph of that review sounds like a desperate attempt to justify the ending.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 29, 2007 9:52:20 PM CDT

    it's based on a book

    by phast freddy

    so they can't really change the ending without fucking it up

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 29, 2007 10:01:24 PM CDT

    bmacsmith

    by annettekellerman

    I didn't say it was weird ending and I didn't say it didn't tie it up. I just said it wasn't with a pretty bow. And I like it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 29, 2007 10:01:41 PM CDT

    You know, for kids!

    by osmosis jones

    I will show you the life of the mind...!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 29, 2007 10:05:41 PM CDT

    "I was completely unaware that the film is based on the Cormac M

    by meshgearfoxx

    Thought it was sheer coincidence? With a title like that I can see why.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 29, 2007 10:07:28 PM CDT

    no subject

    by meshgearfoxx

    "I was completely unaware that the film is based on the Cormac McCarthy novel of the same name" Thought it was sheer coincidence? With a title like that I can see why.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 29, 2007 10:11:17 PM CDT

    When is the Little Lewbowski going to meet Nathan Jr

    by stereotypical evil archer

    C'mon, a sequel to 2 movies at once.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 29, 2007 10:15:10 PM CDT

    meshgearfoxx

    by annettekellerman

    Unaware of the existence of said novel.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 29, 2007 10:19:03 PM CDT

    no problem anne. different strokes for different folks.

    by bmacsmith

    Just from what i heard it sounds like it might annoy me. But then again, lebowski had a kinda anticlimactic ending and i liked that one.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 29, 2007 10:31:19 PM CDT

    well then you should have written

    by meshgearfoxx

    I was completely unaware that the film is based on a Cormac McCarthy novel of the same name. I thought the book was decent but do yourself a favor and read Blood Meridian.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 29, 2007 10:35:10 PM CDT

    meshgearfoxx

    by annettekellerman

    you smart. me stupid. dumb articles

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 29, 2007 11:13:39 PM CDT

    It's not the ending

    by the beef

    that people will have issues with, it's the climax. The Coens, apparently by following the book, don't show you what you're desperately wanting to see. Which, to me, was perfectly fine. Honestly, it grounds the story into a certain reality. It will piss off quite a few people, but according to Josh Brolin that was something anticipated by The Coens when they wrote the script. It defies convention, and it'll be purely subjective if you will find it bothersome, or fitting to the story.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 29, 2007 11:37:50 PM CDT

    unusual ending bad! convention good!

    by badmrwonka

    transformers good! Coen brothers bad! correct grammar and spelling bad!-Massawyrm

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 30, 2007 12:23:19 AM CDT

    Good review

    by turd furgeson

    Reviews don't have to be decades long to convey a complete message about a film and the reviewers experience with it.. Nice write up, and I look forward to reading your next one Annette.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 30, 2007 1:26:27 AM CDT

    Good review.

    by happyfat73

    Well written and articulate. That's a rarity 'round these parts.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 30, 2007 2:23:07 AM CDT

    Damn you Michael Bay

    by mcmlxxvi

    Damn you Michael Bay

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 30, 2007 2:38:07 AM CDT

    Read the book, you'll skip the movie.

    by sgtelias

    That is all.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 30, 2007 6:25:28 AM CDT

    Nice camel-toe...

    by cornponious

    ...Annette. Is there something wrong with me that I would notice that in a cartoon?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 30, 2007 10:30:01 AM CDT

    "There's a strange satisfaction with not..."

    by -guyinthebackrow

    "... being completely satisfied by the end of the film." Hmm. I don't know what that means exactly, but it sounds suspiciously like stupidity. Or you weren't satisfied, but you really liked the rest of the moive, which would simply mean that the ending is flawed, but you didn't want to admit it. But, I could be wrong.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 30, 2007 12:59:29 PM CDT

    Return of Josh Brolin

    by lordrando

    Fucking awesome. I want to see Chunk in the next Coens flick and maybe spirinkle in some Short Round in a blockbuster next year...who would have guessed Sean Astin would carry the torch.....? Corey Feldman? I heard there is a lost boys thing cookin...so ....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 30, 2007 1:02:35 PM CDT

    The Ending

    by lordrando

    If people keep bitching about the ending, im going to puke. Both of McCarthy's recent novels(the road, no country) end in "unsatisfactory manner, if by that you mean ambigous and thristing for more. So the good guy loses, and so no one wins? Too much to wrap your heads around?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 30, 2007 4:48:03 PM CDT

    Llewellyn Moss is the PROTAGONIST, not the antagonist.

    by twindaggerturkey

    That is all.

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback