Logo

Cool News

Tom Hanks & Ron Howard Reunite For DA VINCI CODE Sequel!!

Published at:  Oct 25, 2007 5:37:08 AM CDT

I am – Hercules!!



Actor Tom Hanks, director Ron Howard and screenwriter Akiva Goldsman will reunite February in Europe for “Angels & Demons.”

Variety says Goldsman turned it into a sequel, even though the book is author Dan Brown's prequel to “The DaVinci Code.”

Variety’s Thursday-morning story on the matter says:

Hanks' character, a Harvard-based expert on religious symbols, this time sleuths a mystery that involves a secret society and a conspiracy that leads to Vatican City and threatens the future of the Catholic Church.


Read all of Variety’s story here.



    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 5:08:09 AM CDT

    Yawn...

    by thebigdogg

    Hated the first movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 5:09:07 AM CDT

    I missed it!!!

    by kahootz

    I wanted to be the first to say "yawn." I'll go with a "meh."

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 5:10:22 AM CDT

    Well, then I'll have to say

    by bilblow

  • Oct 25, 2007 5:13:22 AM CDT

    You dumb faggot editors

    by darrenspool

    You duplicated the same fucking story! Get some html skills! Pricks.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 5:13:54 AM CDT

    Wait-what?

    by zero-point

    Wasn't Angels and Demons supposed to be set before Da Vinci Code? Oh well, I just hope they keep the completely OTT finale in there.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 5:13:56 AM CDT

    And 'Angels and Demons' is a prequel

    by darrenspool

  • Oct 25, 2007 5:15:34 AM CDT

    GET RID OF THE DOUBLE POST!

    by darrenspool

    Before everyone gets confused, you assholes.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 5:16:58 AM CDT

    So is it prequel or sequel?

    by thebige

    Because I thought I've read they would take the book and make it a sequel, taking place after the Da Vinci Code storyline. Anybody know?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 5:17:09 AM CDT

    It's not a double post

    by iowa snot client

    It's a word-for-word reimagining of the first post, dumbass.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 5:18:41 AM CDT

    DaVinci was average at best, really boring at worst...

    by dr_zoidberg

    Ian McKellen was the only thing in it worth watching. Count me out of this.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 5:21:07 AM CDT

    24 SEASON 7 TEASER HERE!!!!

    by littledudes

    http://tinyurl.com/37a46b

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 5:22:44 AM CDT

    Glad to see it is two threads.

    by mrfan

    Thought the cough syrup and whiskey combo were making me see things.Oh, could care less about this movie. Thought they were teaming up again to give us Splash 2. Still waiting for that.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 5:23:42 AM CDT

    ok you deleted my post!

    by aicndoesntwantmorecowbell

    or was that the whole talkback

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 5:24:10 AM CDT

    Still want to know the deal behind "much"

    by guy who got a headache and accidentally

    Why the hell does everyone throw it onto the end of incomplete sentences and call it a day? Where the fuck did this stupid idea originate from? And why do you people think it's a good idea to keep doing it

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 5:25:20 AM CDT

    The title will be just: Da Vinci

    by cuervojones

    Or Leonardo Da Vinci. No roman numbers, Stallone style.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 5:26:11 AM CDT

    Quiet news week?

    by ryandowneyjr

  • Oct 25, 2007 5:26:19 AM CDT

    I hope they CG Hanks to make him...

    by reelheed

    less terrible.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 5:27:01 AM CDT

    Man, what a fuck-up

    by darrenspool

    That double post was seriously cheap.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 5:27:45 AM CDT

    The Plot

    by cuervojones

    Christ was chinese, and his mother was a viking woman. The illuminati and the nazis don´t want you to know that.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 5:27:50 AM CDT

    Does Audrey Tatou take it off in this one?

    by littledudes

    Hells yeah! http://tinyurl.com/37a46b

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 5:30:42 AM CDT

    Why?

    by bloo

    I don't remember hearing a big outcry for Angels and Demons to be made, and I didn't think it was that succsful for them and was pretty well panned and I can't imagine it's for some unknown reason to make Dan Brown happy because that dude belives all that DiVinci stuff is real even though it's been proven it's not and tom Hanks basically said so in an interview so again I ask, why?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 5:31:44 AM CDT

    no one cares about 24 little dude!

    by aicndoesntwantmorecowbell

    except the millions of people who watch it of course

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 5:34:38 AM CDT

    YAAaaaaaawwwwwwwWWWWWNNNnnnn!

    by gch888

    I'm too bored even to come up with a proper comment about this.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 5:39:06 AM CDT

    Can I just give Tom Hanks and Ron Howard ten bucks?

    by gozu

    Like "Here you go, now I don't have to sit through another bullshit movie and you get paid. Everybody wins."

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 5:42:01 AM CDT

    You could do that Gozu.

    by raw_bean

    Or you could just you know, not go see it, and keep your ten bucks.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 5:44:07 AM CDT

    Guy Who gets a Headache...

    by llghtst0rmer

    The "much" gag, as far as I can recall, is a Whedonism. It came from Buffy The Vampire Slayer. It's meant to reflect a person's bahavior to them by couching it in a question, meaning to ask if they engage in that particular behavior often, or if it's just at tat particular point in time that they are guilty of said behavior. It's based in the conceit of normal everyday conversation, but broadened to a comedic extent, like for example, if a person tells you they went to a certain restaurant for lunch and you were to ask, "Do you go there much?" Like I said, simple conversation. But if I were to say to you, "Wow - throw sissy fits on a talkback much?" it's broader, and funnier. And, in your case, relevant.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 5:48:28 AM CDT

    Oops... typo.

    by llghtst0rmer

    "...meaning to ask if they engage in that particular behavior often, or if it's just at THAT particular point in time that they are guilty of said behavior."

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 5:49:00 AM CDT

    A Whedonism. Why am I not suprised.

    by guy who got a headache and accidentally

    Yeah. Way funnier. Just a barrel of fucking laughs the word "much" is. Well I'd like to believe there are still people out there, fighting the good fight in the name of the english language and common fucking sense.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 5:54:01 AM CDT

    From the "Deerrrrr" files.

    by maxthesilent

    I'm surprised it took this long.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 6:02:00 AM CDT

    ANGELS & DEMONS is not a prequel

    by skynetbauxi

    by definition, a prequel is a story that is written/released AFTER a previous "episode" of the same "saga", but which takes place BEFORE that previous "episode". therefore, ANGELS & DEMONS is not a prequel to THE DAVINCI CODE, but simply the previous part in the "ROBERT LANGDON SAGA". btw, turning A&D into a sequel seems stupid, they should simply release it as a "prequel" :-)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 6:03:20 AM CDT

    That is great and all...

    by barl

    but how the heck are they gonna get permission to film in the vatican?
    As I heard they were pretty pissed off about The Da Vinci code, so i cant really see them giving permission to film this Prequel turned sequel inside vatican grounds.
    Granted it prolly only about two shots scenes that really need to be on location, the final scene with SPOILER the antimatter bomb going off above the St Peter Church and the killing in the Piazza Di Pietra . I guess you could fake the Sistine Chapel and the rest of the inside shots of the Church, but some of the other famous churces and places could still prove to be problematic getting acces to.
    Of course they could just pay off Belosconi and the rest of mob :-D

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 6:07:30 AM CDT

    aicndoesntwantmorecowbell

    by littledudes

    I saw your comment subject and got totally mad. I got ready tell you to shut the fuck up and make inappropriate comments about your mothers vagina. I'm glad then that I expanded the talkback to see your comment itself. Maybe next time. After all, I am prepared with quips now. http://tinyurl.com/37a46b

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 6:08:04 AM CDT

    Bloo

    by bouncy x

    why you ask? because the first movie made well over 200 million. doesnt change the fact that it isnt really any good but yeah.

    Reply to Talkback

  • By law, shouldn't he still be on the waterboard after that shit? "I found a way to make it a sequel." In Goldsman terms, that means he found a way to make it suck and get paid a truckload of money while doing it. This guy keeps getting work even after every project he does is a masterpiece of diarrhea, it's a wonder that he doesn't have a cabinet position in the Bush Administration.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 6:16:24 AM CDT

    I see Whedon's name has been taken in vain...

    by tonagan

    Do you people have any idea what you've done? Hear that distant wailing? It's Scoobies and Browncoats on the march, and they're headed RIGHT THIS WAY!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 6:20:06 AM CDT

    Headache:

    by llghtst0rmer

    Ever read Shakespeare? The guy had a pretty good knack for turning phrases and playing with the english language. Kinda made him a good writer. I believe it's called being clever.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 6:20:27 AM CDT

    it doesnt matter...

    by obscura

    ...that they've changed the order, virtually nothing will change, other than the fact we already know he's clostrophobic. I personally think the movie was much better than the overrated book, cutting away a lot of the flab and making a semi decent film out of it. Angels and Demons is a far better book, so hopfully the movie should kick ass. they MUST keep that last line from the book tho!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 6:22:50 AM CDT

    stupid stupid stupid

    by charlesgrodinsux

    The first movie got it all wrong. This one is going to be just as bad. Wrong director, wrong lead actor, DEFINATLY wrong writer. I don't care much for Ron Horward save for a few movies, Tom Hanks is still the man, and Akiva, well no, just say no. If they had gone with a different director and style it would have worked. Shoot this like it's a trashy novel, and cast James Spader as the lead and you would have me. But as it stands, no.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 6:29:40 AM CDT

    Whoa Darrenspool!

    by thebladehelm

    Take it easy. So they screwed up in a minor way. Chill out man. There's too many other things wrong in the world to get so worked up about it.Too bad it's not this movie. What a total snooze fest the first one was. And I love Audrey Tatou, too. I'd rather they make Apollo 14 and just show a smooth trouble free mission to the moon.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 6:32:21 AM CDT

    When is Much too Much?

    by thebladehelm

    I was perplexed by the problem someone had with ending a sentence with the word much. It doesn't really seem to happen that much. Um, much. Man, that word gets stranger and stranger the more times you say and type it.Yes, I am a little stoned.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 6:32:43 AM CDT

    Both books are basically the same

    by vesuvio

    Secret society: check, Weirdo assassin: check, Pursuit through historical locations: check, Hot foreign love interest: check. The only way this movie could be possibly any good was if it had a decent screenwriter. But they got Goldsman.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 6:35:03 AM CDT

    So, is this pro-Catholic or anti-Catholic?

    by anna valerious

    -sigh- Just stop trashing us, okay?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 6:35:53 AM CDT

    Oh, and naked Bryce Dallas Howard, of course

    by vesuvio

    For two reasons: 1) She was the best thing Ron Howard made in his entire life 2) My masturbation requires more than that icy cold Manderlay scenes.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 6:38:02 AM CDT

    Ron Howard sucks

    by vesuvio

    Sorry for the trolling, but I just remembered how Fellowship of the Rings got ripped off by that shitty Beautiful Mind. The movies still owe some apologies for Peter Jackson on that.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 6:39:06 AM CDT

    Ron Howard sucks

    by vesuvio

    Sorry for the trolling, but I just remembered how Fellowship of the Rings got ripped off by that shitty Beautiful Mind. The movies still owe some apologies for Peter Jackson on that.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 6:40:23 AM CDT

    Sorry for that double posting too

    by vesuvio

    That was just me being stupid.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 6:48:09 AM CDT

    this will be worse than prison rape:

    by newc0253

    generally speaking, i have no objection to airport thrillers being made into movies.

    some of them can turn out to be plenty entertaining.

    but Dan Brown's writing is agressively stupid and offensively bad. How he came to be such a successful author is one of the central mysteries of our time.

    he must be stopped.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 6:50:58 AM CDT

    Angels & Demons sucked as a book, was far to OTT

    by bongo123

    i mean come on, theres suspending belief ****SPOILER**** then theres being fucking flung out of a 'copter at fuck knows how high and using some piece of paper to glide back down ****SPOILER END**** nah was a piss poor book, Divinci was a definite improvement, they should make his other ones which i think would lend themselves better for film

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 6:51:11 AM CDT

    I'd rather see Blade take on a Vatican conspiracy

    by spandau belly

    He solves problems in a way I relate to more.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 6:54:13 AM CDT

    little dudes

    by aicndoesntwantmorecowbell

    LOL nothing like a angry fan who goes off in a fanboy rage in the heat of the moment lol

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 6:54:48 AM CDT

    If they get this right

    by varakor

    A&D will be so kick ass. Angels and Demons was a way better book than Da vinci Code, so i look foward to this one.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 6:58:59 AM CDT

    10 bucks Gozu GREAT :D

    by metaluna

    There's an idea. Let's all just give 'em ten bucks to NOT make the movie. While we're at it, can we do this for that JLA movie too? Enough already :S

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 7:03:30 AM CDT

    Anna Valerious

    by darth sicilian

    I'm waiting for Dan Brown to write a novel about Islam where he insinuates that Mohammed might not be divine and the religion is based on lies and half truths. You know...take something that is sacred to people and desecrate it under the guise of fiction. No wait…based on recent history...if he did that to Muslims they would try to kill him and his family…like they tried to do with Salman Rushdie.

    Oh well…I guess it’s safer to go after the easy targets.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 7:11:41 AM CDT

    YAWN(even louder than the first)

    by surfsup22

    I'd rather be stuck on an airplane with no food or water than watch anything having to do with the DumbVinci Code.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 7:17:30 AM CDT

    The only way I will see it...

    by nubthesquirrel

    Is if they cast Monica Belucci as Vittoria Vetra and Naveen Andrews as the Hassassin. Otherwise, I will probably add it to my Netflix and see it then or wait till the dollar theater. The story is flawed, no doubt about it but is is vastly better than Da Vinci Code in terms of action.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 7:19:11 AM CDT

    Good point, Sicilian...

    by abin sur

    Look how upset the Muslim world got over a Dutch (I think it was Dutch) CARTOON STRIP that was a little mocking of Islam...radical Muslims (note I said RADICAL, not ALL) started kidnapping people and killing them SPECIFICALLY because of that one incident. I don't gravitate towards any specific religious philosophy, but I will say that I've never read about any Christians going on a rampage after reading Doonesbury.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 7:19:26 AM CDT

    ZZZzzzzzz!

    by filmfunk

    The Da vinci Cod was one of the worst films I've ever had the misfortune to endured!about as thrilling as a granny going downhill on her motor scooter with the brake off!Should just call it 'HANKS' Return of shitto Mullet!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 7:20:01 AM CDT

    Never read any of the books.

    by knuckleduster

    Still haven't seen the movie. I'm a rebel.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 7:21:49 AM CDT

    I know what you did last supper

    by board shitlez

    Is a superior title.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 7:36:49 AM CDT

    ancient news and after DaVinci why?

    by filmcoyote

    This news is so ancient I heard a door creaking when i clicked the link. And DaVinci Code was such a tedious, pedestrian film why would anyone let this team tackle another - okay yes it made a gazillion dollars but i hope audiences aren't duped again. Fool us once shame on you, fool us twice shame on us.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 7:37:41 AM CDT

    Meh. It's Better Than DaVinci.

    by el fuego

    Which isn't to say that it's good, but better... the action and plotting is definitely done better than DaVinci so hopefully this will suck less, although if Tom Hanks still has that godawful mullet, all bets are off.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 7:43:52 AM CDT

    Hair?

    by expert_40

    Uh-oh. Does this mean Tom Hanks is going to be sporting that ugly, fucked-up hair from the first film? The sacrifices some people make for their shit, I mean art.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 7:48:03 AM CDT

    I need a library.....fast!!

    by betaraybill07

  • Oct 25, 2007 7:54:02 AM CDT

    Step on a crack......

    by sparhawk38

    break your Mother's back...step on your sack....SOMERSAULT!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 7:55:13 AM CDT

    A fitting

    by stalin vs predator

  • Oct 25, 2007 7:56:57 AM CDT

    A fitting "screenwriter" for a fitting "writer"

    by stalin vs predator

    Dan Brown, Akiva Goldsman... yes, that's about the same level. All it needs now is some Paul W. S. Anderson (if Uwe is busy) and Freddie Prinze Jr. Oh, and "music" by Marilyn Manson. Then the level of involved talent will be pretty much constant.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 8:03:39 AM CDT

    Tom Hanks was AWFUL

    by skibum

    as Langdon. They should release it as a prequel and get somebody better and with less hockey hair to play Langdon.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 8:04:13 AM CDT

    Why?

    by mrjonz72

  • Oct 25, 2007 8:06:20 AM CDT

    At least Apollo 13 was good

    by pipple

    Other than that, howard has to be oneof the most uninspired directors ever.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 8:32:04 AM CDT

    Terrible Book

    by mooseaka

    Setting aside all of the flammable religious stuff in the book, it was flat out awful. The dialog was somehow worse than DaVinci, the puzzles were more mundane, and the action would make Arnold and Sylvester blush at its absurdity, particularly the way our hero survives the big bang at the end (mentioned above). I think Deus Ex Machina should get top billing in the cast for this movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 8:33:44 AM CDT

    WHY?!??!??!??!??!??!??!?!??!?!??!

    by laserbrain

    Death to Hollywood.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 8:39:19 AM CDT

    Maybe they'll learn from the last movie's mistakes...

    by abin sur

    And make a much better movie, much like Tomb Raider 2's improvement over...D'oh!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 8:46:22 AM CDT

    A Perfect Storm of Mediocrity

    by aquatarkusman

    Shitty plagiarist author, terrible screenwriter, most boring Oscar-winning director ever, and a decent comic actor who's been boring for the last 10 years. Cha-ching!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 8:57:05 AM CDT

    I enjoyed reading both books

    by skibum

    and I think A&D could make a better movie, but not with the team they assembled for Davinci. They dug themselves into a HUGE hole with that steaming turd of a film.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 9:05:23 AM CDT

    Opie needs to stop making movies

    by ripvanmarlowe

    ...I know imdb is never accurate, but I got scared as hell when he was attached to the "east of eden" remake...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 9:08:18 AM CDT

    Another book RUINED! Yay!

    by www.revyou.tv

    DAVINCI CODE was quite possibly one of the worst movies ever made. Brown is famous for his ability to "write" action sequences - too bad Howard is infamous for "filming" action sequences. Top lesson here - don't cast your buddy in a movie just because he's your buddy. *ahem-hanks!*

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 9:11:00 AM CDT

    So

    by optimus v

    Scubs premieres tonight. Talkback?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 9:13:21 AM CDT

    Well the book was better

    by z 008

    Maybe the movie will be to.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 9:23:37 AM CDT

    "Goldsman turned it into a sequel, even though the book is autho

    by cletus van damme

    ...doesn't that pretty much say it all?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 9:24:24 AM CDT

    Fucking truncation

    by cletus van damme

    "Goldsman turned it into a sequel, even though the book is author Dan Brown's prequel"
    THAT says it all dammmit!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 9:55:42 AM CDT

    Wasn't this announced months ago?

    by barry egan

    And the book isn't a prequel, it was the first of the 2 Langdon books written. He wrote Da Vinci afterwords. Dan Brown is a hack. The success of the Da Vinci Code novel always baffled me, it was a book that made people who don't read much feel smart. It does seem like every few years a book comes along that is a huge bestseller and is completely horrible. The Bridges of Madison county was one. Tuesdays with Morrie was one. That one made me want to punch Mitch Albom in the neck.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 10:09:43 AM CDT

    Why make this film?

    by jimmy rabbitte

    Didn't the first one suck badly enough?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 10:15:39 AM CDT

    Why does it need to be a prequel or a sequel?

    by jor-el23

    I view it more like the Bond films, just the continuing adventures. Did they film the Fleming books in chronological order? I don't even see a need to reference Da Vinci Code in an Angels and Demons movie. Audiences will know the book, know that Tom Hanks was in Da Vinci...it's fine.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 10:41:29 AM CDT

    I'll pass

    by refuge5

    The Da Vinci Code was really bad. It was hard to believe I was watching Tom Hanks - that dude typically quality... the Jesus grand daughter was sort of hot though...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 10:59:04 AM CDT

    If you want to be successful

    by nudedude

    Do something that glorifies women.If Opie made DaVinci code as it was written and kept more of the dialog it would have been a chick flick. When I was reading the book, I got so tired of referrences to the Scared Feminine.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 10:59:37 AM CDT

    Activities that threaten the Catholic Church? Cool!

    by uppercanuck

    If only the Catholic Church would be destroyed in real life.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 11:04:27 AM CDT

    Da Vinci Code was a nice, throwaway read...

    by kid z

    ...Angels & Demons was a ludricrous, hacky mess. Da Vinci Code movie sucked.... we're looking at mega-suck here if they do an Angels & Demons flick. (Oh... just so you'll know... if you jump out of an exploding helicopter at 5000 feet, even if you're holding onto the rain tarp they cover the helicopter with when it's parked... the tarp will be snatched from your hands by the relative air velocity of you're falling body, you'll plummet like a stone. Even if that doesn't happen... a tarp is not a parachute... you'll still plummet like a stone... Just so you'll know.)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 11:26:19 AM CDT

    Noooooooooooooooo

    by playswithbiggerblocksthanyou

    Dog Gammit!!!

    Dan Brown is actually a good author! Why does Ron Howard have to run his two books past the ground into the depths of Hollywood Hell.

    He only took out 2 scenes from the book in "Da Vinci", but they managed to totally castrate the movie, voiding it of ANY IMPACT WHATSOFUCKINEVER!!!!! Tom Hanks is the "skeptic" on the fence??? He's supposed to be the protagonist, pushing the "original" idea forward as the hero for the audience.

    Ron Howard castrated the Code, now he's going after the prequel (which is even a better book). This is sadddddd.

    And I was just starting to come around on him with "Cinderella Man".

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 11:26:47 AM CDT

    Angels & Demons is better than Da Vinci

    by performingmonkey

    Hopefully the movie will be better too. There was an AMAZING movie waiting to be made out of The Da Vinci Code, but it turned out to be one of the worst big films I've ever seen. Jesus H Christ, Howard, how the hell could you screw that book up? How the hell was it even possible?? Goldsman is such a hack, that's probably part of the reason, but everyone seemed to be phoning their performance in (except Mckellen, but it's probably impossible for him to give a crap performance, he doesn't have to put it on he's naturally great).

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 11:35:04 AM CDT

    all just Foucault's Pendulum FOR DUMMIES.

    by fleshmachine

    read Umberto Eco if you want some good stuff. This Dan Brown crap is dumbed down garbage for the illiterate masses.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 11:38:22 AM CDT

    "...much" is a Whedonism???

    by fleshmachine

    um..I remember saying "stare much!?" as a kid in the 70's. (you know, when someone was looking at you funny)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 11:41:02 AM CDT

    How did this get the "okay

    by kirbymanly

  • Oct 25, 2007 11:41:52 AM CDT

    How did this get the "okay" after bombing and sucking

    by kirbymanly

    And John Carpenter can't get a movie made?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 11:46:21 AM CDT

    They had to do Da Vinci Code first

    by unlabled

    because of how popular it was but Angels and Demons was always a book much more suited to be adapted to the big screen.

    The ending (they better keep it in-fucking-tact) is gonna be awesome.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 11:46:34 AM CDT

    Becuase carpenter is busy

    by lost jarv

    sitting on his old ass, eating fried chicken and counting the money he gets for whoring his catalogue out. He's a movie pimp. I can't believe there are people that actually liked the book The Davinci Code. Fucking terrible, psuedo-intellectual trite potboiling garbage.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 11:47:13 AM CDT

    and I love John Carpenter films

    by lost jarv

    even the bad ones. So to post that made me sad.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 11:55:22 AM CDT

    Waste of time and talent!

    by teko

    Says it all. I'm sure the money's swell, but Hanks and Howard can do better.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 12:00:40 PM CDT

    Has anyone had the misfortune of reading...

    by thomas cromwell

    'The Expected One'? Its by the self- obsessed and self proclaimed descendant of Jesus and Mary M Kathleen McGowan. Its apparantly based on her own experience in discovering her sacred heritage. Its also a pile of horse shite. Read it and despair then pray for mankind.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 12:03:10 PM CDT

    Yawn much?

    by skeletonparty

    I just made that up.

    Between this film, Stone's "Pinkville" and "The Golden Compass" I really don't see any reason to stop the Taliban from exploding us all up.

    Cinima, TV, and video games could be so great if we actually used our imaginations to tell a story or create a truly unique visceral experience rather than just tear each other down and blow things up.

    Instead we spew molten crap into the minds of our citizens, leaving only mental lilliputians in our wake.

    The only way to save this movie is to put Catwoman in it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 12:22:27 PM CDT

    Believe me. Da Vinci Code the film was a HUGE success

    by novaman5000

    Money-wise, it made a fortune overseas. This was a no-brainer.
    It amazed me that Howard was able to take a fun little read like DVC and turn it into the snoozefest that the film was. Angels and Demons is a bit more grim, but until the ridiculous conclusion it's a pretty fun ride. Lets hope they learned from the mistakes of the first film and can tighten this one up a bit.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 12:34:02 PM CDT

    IS THE ANTI-MATTER JESUS?

    by bringingsexyback

    What's the hook in this book?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 12:47:53 PM CDT

    Who cares?

    by fiester

    What a fucking joke. You can't even call it a franchise with a straight face. Can't these two find anything better to do?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 12:55:09 PM CDT

    CRAP CRAP CRAP

    by the chosen

    Is the best this movie will get to, if they don't change everyone involved.
    The first movie managed to do the impossible, to transform a fast paced twisting piece of entertaining thriller into almost 3 hours of troubled sleep. The second will be the same with Ron and Akiva. And Hanks.
    And it doesn't matter it's now a sequel. It didn't matter even in the books.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 1:08:01 PM CDT

    Angels and Demons could be rewritten...

    by 3 bag enema

    ...into a decent film. Uhg, that ending!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 1:48:31 PM CDT

    Wait a Minute...

    by aquatarkusman

    ... did someone use the words "Ron Howard" and "learn" in the same sentence? Asking him not to be bland is like asking Dane Cook not to be unfunny... it's just not going to happen.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 1:54:56 PM CDT

    I loved Angels and Demons...

    by themarinebiologist

    But it gotta precede Da Vinci Code, it's just the way things are.

    This has got to be the stupidest idea for the stupidest movie franchise of all time.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 2:01:45 PM CDT

    Awwww... whasamatter uppercanuck?

    by johnno

    Were you molested as a wee lad? There there, it's okay...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 2:04:11 PM CDT

    AKA Tom's Bad Hair Day 2

    by lance rocke

    maybe I'll actually see this one

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 2:38:51 PM CDT

    FUCK OFF! FUCK OOOOOOOOOOOOOOFF!!!!

    by spud mcspud

    God, did I hate that Da Vinci Crap book. And the fucking film. And ANGELS AND DEMONS was even fucking worse. And now there's a movie.

    Aw hell NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!

    PS Heh heh. So there you are, MoM...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 2:44:29 PM CDT

    Fuck the Flying Pope

    by quin the eskimo

    isn't this the book with the skydiving pope? These books are really so awful I just completly forgot everything about them.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 2:45:17 PM CDT

    You guys don't find the Jesus/Mary revelation fascinating?

    by bringingsexyback

    And you call yourself Christians?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 2:46:43 PM CDT

    It's not a prequel OR a sequel

    by spud mcspud

    It's a SHITQUEL. As in some kind of quel that absolutely NO-ONE FUCKING WANTED!!! OKAY?!?!??!!??

    And that's a good point: let's see the next Dan Brown novel be about the radical Muslims. Yeah, go have a go at them, see what you get.

    It's easy picking on the Christians and Catholics - we don't tend to vapourise anyone who disagrees with us. Well, maybe the Vatican does. Who fucking knows?

    Either way, go fuck with them. No more Dan Brown. Everyone wins.

    Then make the Blade vs the Vatican movie that someone suggested earlier. That would fucking rule!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 2:56:55 PM CDT

    As a Christian

    by quin the eskimo

    I hate poorly written trype. So did Mr. Christ. That's why he chased all those people out of the temple with a whip, 'cause they were distributing a Torah in which Moses switched places with his Pharoe brother, and they didn't even know it! So Cleopatra was the actually the Messiah. They were so clever! 'Till they got there asses cut with bullhide. Oh YEAH!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 3:17:49 PM CDT

    Third reason why God sucks:

    by spud mcspud

    Because you, mr IAmMrMonkey, are not fucking Megan Fox either. Oh no, you're not. You're really not.

    I feel hollow inside now.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 3:20:24 PM CDT

    I enjoyed it

    by drunkenmonkey73

    Angels and Demons should be a much better movie than Da Vinci code

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 3:22:41 PM CDT

    drunkenmonkey73

    by spud mcspud

    Exactly how drunken were you, monkey, when you read that book???

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 3:37:00 PM CDT

    it doesn't even matter that this is a sequel

    by cedar_room

    because the events from A&D have no bearing whatsoever on what happens in TDVC, so making it happen afterwards will not affect it in any way. The only issue is that the plot points are EXACTLY THE SAME for both books. I shit you not for those who haven't read A&D this is how it goes **SPOILER** old guy gets killed by a creepy assasin. Turns out he has a foxy female relative. Langdon for some reason gets called in to investigate. All turns out to be a big conspiracy that the Catholic Church has been trying to cover up. Langdon investigates whilst creepy assassin carries on creeping and assasinating **END SPOILERS** sound familiar?????

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 4:00:05 PM CDT

    I once heard a rumour that

    by big jim

    the producers of 24 tried to buy this book to adapt as a season of 24. But Dan Brown & Co. said no. Anyone else hear that? Any truth to it?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 5:07:02 PM CDT

    SoylentMean

    by spud mcspud

    Nope, I also asked questions at Sunday School too. I now know more about Christian theology than most of the reverends we get at our church (who tend to be nice folk, well meaning, altruistic and genuine in their desire to help everyone and save their souls) which isn't good when you get into theological arguments with them. Usually they pull rank and start talking about "Who went to Bible college then?". Not me. I therefore win AND lose.

    Religion isn't something that many people properly research. It's more comfortable and comforting that way. Doesn't mean that they're wrong for believing without question: I miss that certainty I had when I was just blindly evangelical, that spiritual stability.

    My spiritual struggle aside, there's still no fucking excuse for THE DA VINCI CODE. And I CANNOT BELIEVE that the guys who wrote HOLY BLOOD, HOLY GRAIL lost that lawsuit. DA VINCI CODE is so fucking similar it's stupid. And that book was disproved in the late 1980s anyway. KNights Templar Rennes-le-Chateau my festering arse.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 5:14:48 PM CDT

    Soylent

    by spud mcspud

    Me too - what really rocked me was how little the doctrine of Hell was actually in any translations of the Bible until the Middle Ages, when the Catholic Church was basically using the afterlife as a reason to tell the poor that it's okay to be poor - "You'll be rewarded in the hereafter". And hell was another tool to keep the repressed masses down. It's completely at odds with any theology that puts forth the idea of a loving God.

    I agree that God has a wicked sense of humour. I mean, Megan Fox is over there and I'm over here...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 5:15:57 PM CDT

    The voice of God

    by spud mcspud

    Does anyone else think that God's voice sounds like Patrick Stewart?

    Just me then...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 5:24:42 PM CDT

    The Threat to the Catholic Church is...

    by stark industries

    Stark Industries!

    WE are the future!

    We have the Technology!

    And we only have to fire it ONCE!....
    -Stark

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 5:41:59 PM CDT

    M-o-M

    by spud mcspud

    Cheers for that - haven't seen the Pasolini, but will look for that. Loved LAST TEMPTATION - the scene where he looks at what his life with Mary could be is so incredibly moving, every time. Willem Dafoe nailed that interpretation, it is breathtaking cinema. As for PASSION OF THE CHRIST... PASSION FOR DIVINE TORTURE PORN would be more like it. Two hours of solid gore and torture, with almost zero understanding of the theology behind it. It was like watching BATMAN AND ROBIN again.

    In all seriousness, Mel has never been more off the point in a movie. I argued with every Christian I know about that movie - to me, PASSION is the most offensive life of Christ ever made. Utterly beneath contempt.

    Rant over. We now return to our regular scheduled slagging off of Dan Brown, the shitdog.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 5:42:08 PM CDT

    Really? I thought it was davinci code..

    by cotton mcknight

    was generally considered a disappointment. I never saw it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 6:11:24 PM CDT

    Memories

    by spud mcspud

    Spud!!! Yep, I do truly love the TRAINSPOTTING (and I am a bit odd looking in that Spud way) but I was going for the "I am a couch potato" thing. The Mc has no meaning - I'm from the Midlands in the UK, and the only Scottish ancestry I have is an aunt who left to live up there years ago. Merely an affectation.

    That said, I'm with you all the way on nunsploitation. Love it! Have you seen the Lance Henriksen PIT AND THE PENDULUM? Not quite nunsploitation, but melodramatic grand guignol of the cheesiest order. I thoroughly enjoyed it, shit production values and all.

    Cheers! (Must be my unnatural love for London that makes me so Mockney. I dunno...)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 6:19:06 PM CDT

    As if the first wasn't BAD enough!!!!

    by echobase

    Do we really want a sequel/prequel?!?!
    The first film was boring, badly made and frankly it revealed the book's weaknesses (i.e. one expositional scene after another)...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 6:24:45 PM CDT

    i never saw the first one

    by aicndoesntwantmorecowbell

    look like it was gonna be fuckin boring then thats what i heard so i really wont ever see it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 7:36:46 PM CDT

    Two exclamation points?

    by ironburl

    For yet another sequel to yet another movie that most people either hated or thought was just OK? I really don't get the enthusiasm. How is this not terrible news?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 7:39:13 PM CDT

    THE PASSION OF THE CHRIST: RELOADED

    by aicndoesntwantmorecowbell

    that would be AMAZING

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 8:03:19 PM CDT

    Well,

    by lornsorrow

    I like the Da Vinci Code, and even though I don't take the whole thing serious, there was some true historical statements in it (like how much of an overbearing ass Constantine was). I've read Angels and Demons, and I think it will make a fine film, perhaps not as big as the Da Vinci Code, but its a fun story none the less. Either way, with movie like the Da Vinci Code and National Treasure 1 and now 2 coming up, I'm glad to see films that make people think and have big mysteries as a main part of them instead of just mindless repetitive action with bullshit plots. I say, bring on more of these epic mystery films!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 8:17:49 PM CDT

    putting aside the fact that the Bible is one

    by misnomer

    seriously edited and censored piece of work, anyone that literally believes in Chirstianity really needs to do some research into the religions that preceded its inception. The iconography of Christianity is pretty much derived from earlier Babylonian and Egyptian religions most of which represented the worship of the Sun. e.g birth of Christ is curiously celebrated at the winter solstice *the dates never changed from earlier religions* (christ has risen again- like the sun rises again at the end of the winter solstice) 12 disciples of Horus (each representing the seasons) 12 disciples of christ. Horus was was "the truth and the life", so was Christ. Horus was a carpenter...so was Christ. The holy trinity of babylonian religion where the father, son and holy spirit were seen as one. The holy trinity of Christianity is exactly the same. The virgin birth of Queen Semiramis, the virgin birth of Mary...The Halo in earlier religions represented the Sun (i.e Sun God) yet it remains in images of Christ. The similarities are endless.....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 8:18:59 PM CDT

    no subject

    by misnomer

    the real "code" in the painting of The Last Supper is that the 12 disciples are grouped into 4 lots of 3 like the seasons.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 8:22:07 PM CDT

    no subject

    by misnomer

    organised religion is bs. And the biggest flaw of The Da Vinci Code movie (aside from it all being nonsense) was the anti-climactic ending.Whoo-eee I'm related to Christ! The End.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 8:24:22 PM CDT

    no subject

    by misnomer

    oh and...growing a mullet when your hairline has receded that far is never a good idea.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 8:41:17 PM CDT

    Great post misnomer

    by lornsorrow

    As an ex-Christian for many years now (I was one for over a decade, and a serious apologist/theologian) I recommend the book, The Jesus Mysteries: Was the "Original Jesus" a Pagan God? by Timothy Freke & Peter Gandy. Also: The Jesus Puzzle: Did Christianity Begin with a Mythical Christ? Challenging the Existence of an Historical Jesus by Earl Doherty, also: The Secret Origins of the Bible by Tim Callahan, The Born Again Skeptic's Guide To The Bible by Ruth Hurmence Green.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 25, 2007 9:21:09 PM CDT

    mullets are always a good idea

    by aicndoesntwantmorecowbell

    theyll never go out of style!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 26, 2007 12:26:57 AM CDT

    Jesus was a creation of Paul

    by darrenspool

    Who happened to be homosexual.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 26, 2007 12:38:09 AM CDT

    The Sequel to end all Interest

    by 5 by 5

    Why are these two talented guys wasting their energy on THIS? Didn't see the first movie, and won't see this one either.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 26, 2007 4:37:44 AM CDT

    Anchorite - The Christ rape-fest thing

    by spud mcspud

    If you like that sort of thing, you would love Garth Ennis' PREACHER series if you haven't already read them. The lineage of Christ is kept carefully, through generations of inbreeding, resulting in a deformed, mongoloid child cared for and hidden by a renegade Vatican faction known as The Grail, who hope one day to use the child as religious leverage against the Church. There's a great scene where a high-ranking member of the Grail, General Starr, meets the gibbering imbecile - who promprtly throws a handful of his own shit at him. That series of graphic novels are the most blasphemous thing I have ever read - and I laughed until I almost pissed myself. Funniest attack on religion I have ever read. My evangelical side shook and quivered the whole time, convinced I was going to Hell, but for all its flaws (weak ending, lack of real theological depth, kneejerk reactions to the Christian way of life etc) PREACHER is 10 volumes of the funniest, most offensive sick shit you will ever read.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 26, 2007 5:22:18 AM CDT

    Will they keep the ending...

    by blindambition238

    Where Langdon parachutes from a crashing helicopter with a blanket?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 26, 2007 8:11:50 AM CDT

    Thank goodness.

    by wowsucks

    I could use another 2 1/2 hours of sleep. I like Hanks but the movie was weak, and odds are this will follow in those footsteps.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 26, 2007 9:06:49 AM CDT

    A sequel to a sleepfest...

    by shady drifter

    Only means another sleepfest. Who needs valuum anymore?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 26, 2007 10:52:03 AM CDT

    I don't think the penis is evil.

    by skeletonparty

    It is just misunderstood.

    At least, mine it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 26, 2007 10:58:23 AM CDT

    The Only Acceptable Sequel

    by aquatarkusman

    The Greatest Story Ever Told II: Christ Harder

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 26, 2007 1:16:04 PM CDT

    tom hanks is on myspace

    by ironic_name

    otm shank was not in a second ep of the sipmsons.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 26, 2007 1:17:14 PM CDT

    sipmsons isn't cool, tufuturama is.

    by ironic_name

  • Oct 26, 2007 1:34:45 PM CDT

    "I know what you did last supper"

    by rei-ginsei

    ^ I think that's one of the funniest things I've read in a talkback

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 26, 2007 2:25:40 PM CDT

    If you READ the book, you'd know that...

    by thegringogentile

    ...this thing wasn't much more than a rough draft for Da Vinci! It's a real piece of shit. I hope they manage to make a better movie out of it, but I'm dreaming.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Oct 26, 2007 2:54:49 PM CDT

    BORE-VICI CODE 2

    by zooch

    Now with even less adventure!

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback