Cool News
A Fistful Of Reviews From SCREAMFEST LA!
Hey, everyone. ”Moriarty” here.
I wish I’d been able to make it to some of Screamfest LA this year. Rachel Belofsky and all the fine folks over there do great work, and it sounds like a heck of a line-up. Unfortunately, like any other writer in LA right now, I’m scrambling to meet some pre-strike deadlines so I can sock away some money for what may be a really ugly holiday season ahead.
So I’m pleased to see this wrap-up featuring reviews of many of the titles that were screened. Gives me a chance to see what I missed:
Harry,
I saw you sent a shout out to all horror fans that ScreamFest was happening in LA, but I haven't seen any feedback on the films that played there. I had the opportunity to catch a few and thought I'd throw out my 2 cents.
Dead in 3 Days: This flick out of Austria didn't play like an independent film, nor did it feel anything like what ScreamFest boasts is part of "The New Breed of Horror." It played by the rules and felt like, as someone on IMDB put it, 'The I know what you did last austrian summer.' That being said, the flick did look great, had a nice score and sound design, and did have a few pay-off moments. It's not a bad film, just nothing interesting enough to talk about. The girl who played Nina did have a very odd charm about her, and the guys where successful in that I was rooting for them to die, and happy when they did. Some major plot holes and very convenient happenings, but beautiful shots of the surroundings sufficed. Overall, a satisfying rental if you want something you've seen before, only this time with subtitles.
A'l'Interieur (INSIDE): There's a certain element that attends horror films or horror conventions, or in this case horror film festivals. A certain group I'm convinced is one chromosome away from being a serial killer. They shout "I want blood" while opening credits roll and scream when they get it, demanding "I want more..." No matter how extreme their blood lust is, no one will ever shout "I want more" in this film. It is, unequivocally, the bloodiest film I've ever seen. Brutal. Totally and Utterly Brutal.
See, even now some of you are reading this and despite mentioning anything about the plot or the caliber of acting or storytelling, you already want to see it. Sick Fucks! To sum it up, a pregnant woman who lost her hubby in a car accident is in a state of distant mourning with everyone around her and just wants to go home and spend christmas eve on her own. She's to be induced to labor the next morning and has a friend picking her up. Then there's a knock at the door, and they don't waste time establishing this woman at the door knows who she is, what she's got in her belly, and wants Inside (both the house, and the belly). What starts with a bad melodramatic piano score and slow moving plot finally kicks in with the drag of a pair of giant scissors across a naked pregnant belly, only to drop with a 'plunk' on the belly button, and S-L-I-D-E inside. Dear god. And that's probably from that point on the tamest thing you're gonna see. It is straight shock value horror.
The plot becomes as thin as the placenta, which will eventually drop to the floor, and it kind of played like a french 'Home Alone' but Macully Culkin's pregnant and covered in blood. I still can't decide if this is a good film. Was it effective in its imagery? Yes. Did it satisfy the blood lust of the crowd? Yes, and more... Did you leave feeling like you've been told a great story? No, and I don't even think there was one because stories usually have a beginning, middle, and end, and this film has no end. There's just no one left to kill, so they gotta roll the credits. The score is out of control, after that cheesy piano music it becomes this endless techno thump that I think was intended to play like a heart beat (both the characters, and yours).
Overall I'd say if you're into torture porn, this is the holy grail of those films -- what it’s been building to since that sub-genre started. Let's torture a pregnant woman... But as far as story and character, which I still like in a horror film, this had little to nothing to offer. The lead is oddly adorable and plays it very convincingly. There is one moment where the film TOTALLY dropped the ball and I hope that sequence is cut out before whatever release it gets happens. It takes this very real, very brutal situation and hams it up with this incredibly lame unrealistic sequence that tried to play like something out of Twin Peaks. Other than that, incredibly well done in its unrelenting brutality... These directors knew what they wanted and did an incredible job of getting it, it's just a matter of whether or not you want that too. The only place to go from here I think is to start really torturing people on screen.
Sympathy: Probably my favorite film of the fest. This is the complete other side of the spectrum from a film like INSIDE. It is a very very independent film, what you really hope to see at a film festival in that a film like this won't ever really show up at the multi-plex (which is a shame). As I mentioned ScreamFest boasts that they showcase 'The New Breed of Horror.' While a film like INSIDE is the top of the current breed (blood-soaked endurance tests of endless exploitation imagery), SYMPATHY is the new direction I hope the genre heads to. It's not even really a horror film, it's an incredibly smart thriller, with definite shades of horror.
Don't get me wrong, there's a great deal of blood in the film, but the violence is never exploitative and is never for any reason other than to service the plot forward. The story is about a bankrobber and his hostage who hole-up for the night in a bad motel. Some shit goes down with the mouthy hostage and she manages to seal her fate in the first ten minutes getting herself handcuffed to the bed for the night and shot (they don't waste time here). Then it gets strange as the bankrobber leaves the room (unlike us, we never leave the room) and when he comes back an escaped convict has broken in and takes the two of them hostage. I know that may sound absurd, but somehow when you're watching it you never roll your eyes as it sets up one of the great cat & mouse games
you'll ever see. The film becomes all writing and great directing, serviced by some incredible performances from the three leads. No one is really what they seem and someone's in cahoots with someone else, but there's just so many shifting advancements that you're never sure. The score is classic and the
sound design impeccable as the whole pic sometimes rolls like a Hitchcock film and sometimes like a chaotic 70's horror. The shots are fantastic and there's an endless amount of them as it cuts all over the room, but never falls into tricks like speeding up the film. No MTV or Joel Silver bullshit here, Thank God.
Then the last 20 minutes or so fly with a barrage of blood, words, and revelations that leave you glued to your seat. The last shot is haunting and unforgettable (like many in the film) and you're left with a moody credit song that has you going, 'wow, the time just past and I've been completely fucking entertained.' It is not just stimulus of the eyes and ears, but the mind. These are indelible characters, each on beautifully fleshed out and realized, and the story is truly a full circle. This film proves that a smart, independent films can be made for this audience. The gore shots were spot on, never showing too much or too little. As much crazy shit happens, nothing seems gratuitous, which is something very rare these days in cinema.
To Note: There was major projection issues with this screening that delayed it, and the director spoke before the film about how what we were seeing visually is at about half quality. But he handled it well and honestly I forgot about it ten minutes in, which is a true testament to the story
that you could take away image quality, and still be glued to the screen. That and the film all takes place in one-room, which was a very Hitchcockian move that took a lot of balls on their behalf, to trust an audience with that kind of set-up. But it works. It creates a beautiful sense of claustrophobia that has you fixated on the characters and where they're headed. Then at the end the director made a great joke about how much better the film will look on your iPod Nano, and in a very classy move gave everyone in the audience a DVD to go home and watch (he must have went home and grabbed them while the film was playing). The cast and crew were there and it didn't look like more than ten people -- a truly indie effort. I did watch the film the next night on my flat-screen and it looks fantastic. It's not a multi-million dollar hollywood effort, it truly is what I hope "the new breed of horror" to be. This is one to watch for, as is the director and three leads...
Paranormal Activity: The other seemingly true indie of the fest was this ghost story of the blair witch flavor. Reminding me of Open Water, it is such a great premise that at times was incredibly successful, and at times fell flat. The premise is a boyfriend and girlfriend living together think they hear things bumping in the night, so the boyfriend buys a camera and starts filming their lives -- leaving it on a tripod at night to film them sleeping. As far as when the boyfriend has the camera, it at times gets very tedious to watch, truly like watching someone's home videos. But where the film shines is every time that bad boy cuts the bed and the couple has fallen asleep, some really creepy and cool shit goes down. The thing I'll award the filmmakers on is their restraint. It never gets Poltergeist over-the-top and the more subtle and simple things are the more they send tingles up your spine, like what we all imagine to happen when we’re sleeping. The two lead actors were true amateurs, which for a film like this is essential. At times they are just plain bad, but they grow on you and do become seemingly a realistic couple.
My one major complaint is that when shit really gets crazy I didn’t ever buy their reactions. It gets to the point where any normal human being would be running for the hills to get out of that house, and they’re going, “man, that’s weird. Ok, let’s go to bed again!” In the end though this film
was very unique and at times I was saying to myself, this could be the film everyone's talking about next Halloween. But it needs some things taken out and the ending dragged on too long past the moment when it was really effective (remember the pan to the corner in Blair Witch). There’s a moment here they should have slammed to black and left all of us totally creeped out. I like the film a lot and it's a strong effort, I guess my only problem is I just can't buy this sub-genre of "the footage you're about to see is real..." anymore. With that big monster movie coming out from JJ Abrams that will all be shot on home video cameras by the stars, it seems we're gonna start seeing a lot of these very soon. I think the new George Romero film, which also played ScreamFest but I didn't see, incorporates the same premise, and there’s the Poughkeepsie Tapes as well. I give this film props though, smart premise and well done. Whether or not this survives the barrage of films like this coming soon, we’ll see. Under the right guise though, a really effective night at the movies.
I did see a few more of the films but you've read enough and these are the one's worth mentioning. I didn't catch The Signal, which I know this site really
likes, and I did see 30 Days of Night, which made me want to run back upstairs for more indie films. I think the most compelling stuff is coming from these
truly indie efforts these days, and I hope some of these films can see the light of day and take the genre to a new place. It's time...
SCREAMAN
I saw you sent a shout out to all horror fans that ScreamFest was happening in LA, but I haven't seen any feedback on the films that played there. I had the opportunity to catch a few and thought I'd throw out my 2 cents.
Dead in 3 Days: This flick out of Austria didn't play like an independent film, nor did it feel anything like what ScreamFest boasts is part of "The New Breed of Horror." It played by the rules and felt like, as someone on IMDB put it, 'The I know what you did last austrian summer.' That being said, the flick did look great, had a nice score and sound design, and did have a few pay-off moments. It's not a bad film, just nothing interesting enough to talk about. The girl who played Nina did have a very odd charm about her, and the guys where successful in that I was rooting for them to die, and happy when they did. Some major plot holes and very convenient happenings, but beautiful shots of the surroundings sufficed. Overall, a satisfying rental if you want something you've seen before, only this time with subtitles.
A'l'Interieur (INSIDE): There's a certain element that attends horror films or horror conventions, or in this case horror film festivals. A certain group I'm convinced is one chromosome away from being a serial killer. They shout "I want blood" while opening credits roll and scream when they get it, demanding "I want more..." No matter how extreme their blood lust is, no one will ever shout "I want more" in this film. It is, unequivocally, the bloodiest film I've ever seen. Brutal. Totally and Utterly Brutal.
See, even now some of you are reading this and despite mentioning anything about the plot or the caliber of acting or storytelling, you already want to see it. Sick Fucks! To sum it up, a pregnant woman who lost her hubby in a car accident is in a state of distant mourning with everyone around her and just wants to go home and spend christmas eve on her own. She's to be induced to labor the next morning and has a friend picking her up. Then there's a knock at the door, and they don't waste time establishing this woman at the door knows who she is, what she's got in her belly, and wants Inside (both the house, and the belly). What starts with a bad melodramatic piano score and slow moving plot finally kicks in with the drag of a pair of giant scissors across a naked pregnant belly, only to drop with a 'plunk' on the belly button, and S-L-I-D-E inside. Dear god. And that's probably from that point on the tamest thing you're gonna see. It is straight shock value horror.
The plot becomes as thin as the placenta, which will eventually drop to the floor, and it kind of played like a french 'Home Alone' but Macully Culkin's pregnant and covered in blood. I still can't decide if this is a good film. Was it effective in its imagery? Yes. Did it satisfy the blood lust of the crowd? Yes, and more... Did you leave feeling like you've been told a great story? No, and I don't even think there was one because stories usually have a beginning, middle, and end, and this film has no end. There's just no one left to kill, so they gotta roll the credits. The score is out of control, after that cheesy piano music it becomes this endless techno thump that I think was intended to play like a heart beat (both the characters, and yours).
Overall I'd say if you're into torture porn, this is the holy grail of those films -- what it’s been building to since that sub-genre started. Let's torture a pregnant woman... But as far as story and character, which I still like in a horror film, this had little to nothing to offer. The lead is oddly adorable and plays it very convincingly. There is one moment where the film TOTALLY dropped the ball and I hope that sequence is cut out before whatever release it gets happens. It takes this very real, very brutal situation and hams it up with this incredibly lame unrealistic sequence that tried to play like something out of Twin Peaks. Other than that, incredibly well done in its unrelenting brutality... These directors knew what they wanted and did an incredible job of getting it, it's just a matter of whether or not you want that too. The only place to go from here I think is to start really torturing people on screen.
Sympathy: Probably my favorite film of the fest. This is the complete other side of the spectrum from a film like INSIDE. It is a very very independent film, what you really hope to see at a film festival in that a film like this won't ever really show up at the multi-plex (which is a shame). As I mentioned ScreamFest boasts that they showcase 'The New Breed of Horror.' While a film like INSIDE is the top of the current breed (blood-soaked endurance tests of endless exploitation imagery), SYMPATHY is the new direction I hope the genre heads to. It's not even really a horror film, it's an incredibly smart thriller, with definite shades of horror.
Don't get me wrong, there's a great deal of blood in the film, but the violence is never exploitative and is never for any reason other than to service the plot forward. The story is about a bankrobber and his hostage who hole-up for the night in a bad motel. Some shit goes down with the mouthy hostage and she manages to seal her fate in the first ten minutes getting herself handcuffed to the bed for the night and shot (they don't waste time here). Then it gets strange as the bankrobber leaves the room (unlike us, we never leave the room) and when he comes back an escaped convict has broken in and takes the two of them hostage. I know that may sound absurd, but somehow when you're watching it you never roll your eyes as it sets up one of the great cat & mouse games
you'll ever see. The film becomes all writing and great directing, serviced by some incredible performances from the three leads. No one is really what they seem and someone's in cahoots with someone else, but there's just so many shifting advancements that you're never sure. The score is classic and the
sound design impeccable as the whole pic sometimes rolls like a Hitchcock film and sometimes like a chaotic 70's horror. The shots are fantastic and there's an endless amount of them as it cuts all over the room, but never falls into tricks like speeding up the film. No MTV or Joel Silver bullshit here, Thank God.
Then the last 20 minutes or so fly with a barrage of blood, words, and revelations that leave you glued to your seat. The last shot is haunting and unforgettable (like many in the film) and you're left with a moody credit song that has you going, 'wow, the time just past and I've been completely fucking entertained.' It is not just stimulus of the eyes and ears, but the mind. These are indelible characters, each on beautifully fleshed out and realized, and the story is truly a full circle. This film proves that a smart, independent films can be made for this audience. The gore shots were spot on, never showing too much or too little. As much crazy shit happens, nothing seems gratuitous, which is something very rare these days in cinema.
To Note: There was major projection issues with this screening that delayed it, and the director spoke before the film about how what we were seeing visually is at about half quality. But he handled it well and honestly I forgot about it ten minutes in, which is a true testament to the story
that you could take away image quality, and still be glued to the screen. That and the film all takes place in one-room, which was a very Hitchcockian move that took a lot of balls on their behalf, to trust an audience with that kind of set-up. But it works. It creates a beautiful sense of claustrophobia that has you fixated on the characters and where they're headed. Then at the end the director made a great joke about how much better the film will look on your iPod Nano, and in a very classy move gave everyone in the audience a DVD to go home and watch (he must have went home and grabbed them while the film was playing). The cast and crew were there and it didn't look like more than ten people -- a truly indie effort. I did watch the film the next night on my flat-screen and it looks fantastic. It's not a multi-million dollar hollywood effort, it truly is what I hope "the new breed of horror" to be. This is one to watch for, as is the director and three leads...
Paranormal Activity: The other seemingly true indie of the fest was this ghost story of the blair witch flavor. Reminding me of Open Water, it is such a great premise that at times was incredibly successful, and at times fell flat. The premise is a boyfriend and girlfriend living together think they hear things bumping in the night, so the boyfriend buys a camera and starts filming their lives -- leaving it on a tripod at night to film them sleeping. As far as when the boyfriend has the camera, it at times gets very tedious to watch, truly like watching someone's home videos. But where the film shines is every time that bad boy cuts the bed and the couple has fallen asleep, some really creepy and cool shit goes down. The thing I'll award the filmmakers on is their restraint. It never gets Poltergeist over-the-top and the more subtle and simple things are the more they send tingles up your spine, like what we all imagine to happen when we’re sleeping. The two lead actors were true amateurs, which for a film like this is essential. At times they are just plain bad, but they grow on you and do become seemingly a realistic couple.
My one major complaint is that when shit really gets crazy I didn’t ever buy their reactions. It gets to the point where any normal human being would be running for the hills to get out of that house, and they’re going, “man, that’s weird. Ok, let’s go to bed again!” In the end though this film
was very unique and at times I was saying to myself, this could be the film everyone's talking about next Halloween. But it needs some things taken out and the ending dragged on too long past the moment when it was really effective (remember the pan to the corner in Blair Witch). There’s a moment here they should have slammed to black and left all of us totally creeped out. I like the film a lot and it's a strong effort, I guess my only problem is I just can't buy this sub-genre of "the footage you're about to see is real..." anymore. With that big monster movie coming out from JJ Abrams that will all be shot on home video cameras by the stars, it seems we're gonna start seeing a lot of these very soon. I think the new George Romero film, which also played ScreamFest but I didn't see, incorporates the same premise, and there’s the Poughkeepsie Tapes as well. I give this film props though, smart premise and well done. Whether or not this survives the barrage of films like this coming soon, we’ll see. Under the right guise though, a really effective night at the movies.
I did see a few more of the films but you've read enough and these are the one's worth mentioning. I didn't catch The Signal, which I know this site really
likes, and I did see 30 Days of Night, which made me want to run back upstairs for more indie films. I think the most compelling stuff is coming from these
truly indie efforts these days, and I hope some of these films can see the light of day and take the genre to a new place. It's time...
SCREAMAN
-
+ Expand All
-
Every now and then on AICN I get to a point in an article where the writing is so good I quickly scroll back up to the top to see if it's one of the staff members. Great reviews.
-
busy talkback
-
Uh. No. The girl gave what had to be the worst screen performance ever seen. "You're hurrrrting meeeyeeeyeeeeeeyeeeeeee!" Christ. I actually walked out of the movie because after 45 minutes it was already getting completely idiotic with its ludicrous "twists" and I figured it would just get worse. Only movie I have ever walked out of in 25 years of movie-going. Just out of curiosity though, how DID it end?
-
It DID have an ending. Though I guess since you didn't understand that I can understand why you enjoyed Sympathy so much. To each his own I guess.
-
I've always found it interesting when someone says they didn't like the performances in a film, when they don't watch the whole film... A great performance should be an arc and without seeing that arc completely there's no way to gauge it. I'm afraid you walked out too early BitterMan because in a game of cat & mouse what you may have seen as 'bad acting' could have been part of the bait laid out in the game. I thought the performances where astounding, especially for an indie film, and it seems so did Variety when I looked up the external reviews for this film on imdb. Meanwhile, it truly is 'to each his own' but don't be the jackass that asks people to post the ending to a suspense thriller online. Some of us do like to see movies without knowing how they end. You truly are, a Bitter Man...
-
Seriously, I'm as jaded as the next guy...but this movie completely freaked me out. Best minimilist horror movie in years. Inside was great too!
-
Seem a bit Admiral Ackbar inspired? I can't help but hear that voice when I see the poster. Saw IV....It's A Trap! -
There's this great thing you can do concerning spoilers to a movie. It's called MARKING IT SPOILER. That way, folks can skip over it if they don't want to read it. It's not my fault AICN uses the most antiquated posting software on the entire internet and thus we can't have PMs or advanced HTML tagging. And I don't think you need to see an entire film to know someone can't act. Like I have to watch ALL of Godfather III to know Sofia Coppola is dreadful? Does something happen at the end of Saw that makes it totally understandable that Cary Elwes and Danny Glover give the worst performances of their career? I don't think so. The girl was terrible, and I have since found out part of the ending (concerning her character) and it's still no excuse for how bad she was, though I can at least understand a theory why it would. I'd explain more but i'd hate to be a jackass and spoil part of the end of a movie, because apparently you are forced to read everything in a talkback even when it's recommended you don't.
-
I really don't wanna get into a talkback battle over this film, so this is my last post (even know I know you'll respond and I hate not getting the last word, that's why I'm named after Jack Burton :) I obviously liked it a lot (so did the guy who posted this) and you didn't, that's fine. That's what built this site -- opinions on film. I was floored to discover today that someone on this site hated the new Coen Brothers film, which I heard was hands down the best film of the year. And then there's Harry, who just loves everything :) But I do feel the need to throw this out because I've followed this film's website since I saw it this summer. "Few women on film have managed to terrorize two possibly psychotic males while handcuffed to a bed and bleeding to death." That comes from Variety, who called the film "a female empowerment missle." Then Bloody-Disgusting compared her to Hannibal Lecter and Fatally-Yours called her the standout of "One of the best indie films this year." These seem like credible reviewers to me... Again, like you said, 'to each his own.' I just dug the flick and can't imagine how at the end of it you wouldn't say, "Damn, she was really good." And I agree strongly, there should be PMs or HTML tagging because I've stumbled into spoilers too many times on this site and I've ruined some films for myself that way. Anyway, I dig sympathy and I liked her a lot. And I'm pretty sure I'm gonna love No Country for Old Men.
-
I went to the screening of this film actually, and I was amazed. The reviewer is right that the movie isn't about much of anything, and it is so incredibly gory and violent. It is so extreme that I think the audience will eventually disconnect from it. I'm usually very quiet during movies, but I was squirming and screaming during this. If anybody remembers, during one of the earlier brutal scenes, when the audience was silent I said "Jesus" and I guess it was loud enough for everyone to hear because people started laughing, which is good because a tension breaker is needed for this kind of film. Anyways that doesn't matter, but the film does go pretty far at the end, turning into some kind of fucked up play where you don't know whether to laugh or continue screaming. I don't know. It's flawed towards the end, but picks up by turning into a surrealistic nightmare. I happen to like the film, in a sort of masochistic way I guess haha. I thought the soundtrack and sound design was excellent and very engrossing. If the film didn't have the atmosphere and tension it has, it wouldn't be a good film at all. I guess this movie is more about having an experience than getting into some in depth story. There's more to say but I'm done.
-
I dont think it was ever intended to be anything more than that. Where was the Twin Peaks moment? I must have not caught on to that. The best gory serious film that ive ever seen.
http://tinyurl.com/pv8do
Readers Talkback
User Login
Top Talkbacks
- Whitney Houston 1963 - 2012 -- 171 total posts 169 posts
- AVENGERS enemy revealed as pink boardgame pieces... You might suffer some form of elation... SPOILERS!!! -- 157 total posts 111 posts
- There's a STAR TREK video game that is going to lead into JJ's STAR TREK 2 apparently... -- 138 total posts 75 posts
- Here's The Red Band Trailer For Drafthouse Films' THE FP! -- 67 total posts 67 posts
- To Commemorate The 3D Release Of STAR WARS EPISODE I: THE PHANTOM MENACE, George Lucas Wants You To Know...Greedo Shoots First!! -- 479 total posts 62 posts
- New JUDGE DREDD post production footage pops up -- 59 total posts 59 posts
- Does ‘SNL’ Rhyme With ‘Deschanel’?? Learn Which SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE Vet Hosts After Sexy Zooey!! -- 62 total posts 59 posts
- HANNA's Saoirse Ronan to boss around seven little people -- 48 total posts 45 posts
- Friday Brings SWEEPS DAY NINE!! Gab Here About Tonight’s FRINGE!! Plus Einstein on TIM, Wiig On PORTLANDIA, MAHER, CLONE, GIFTED, GRIMM, SPARTACUS, SUPERNATURAL, GOLD RUSH And More!! -- 116 total posts 32 posts
- SPACE 2099!! -- 181 total posts 30 posts