Cool News
Fabfunk is not into INTO THE WILD!!
SPOILER ALERT !!
Ahoy, squirts! Quint here. I've heard good things about this flick and I really like the trailer. However, I do not know the source material, so hopefully I'll escape some of the pitfalls that Fabfunk couldn't by being a huge fan of the original book. It's a completely valid place to come from, of course. I just hope my experience with this flick is better than Mr. Funk's was. Here's his thoughts! Enjoy!
Hey Harry and Mori,
I didn't think I would feel like this, but I may be all alone in hating "Into The Wild". It was one of the most anticipated moves of the fall for me, and I was intimately familiar with the source material, not to mention a fan of Sean Penn's previous film, "The Pledge". But as I sat in the theater as the only dry eye in the house, I couldn't help think that this was a drastic misappropriation of the source material, that being Jon Krakauer's gripping, fascinating book.
Full disclosure- the first time I read "Into The Wild", I was homeless for slightly less than two months. So, more than most, I related to the idea spread forth by the book's tragic protagonist Chris McCandless, that life had never been so exciting as it was when he was penniless. I didn't have it as rough as McCandless- thanks, abandoned Byrd Stadium- as I wasn't homeless by choice and I was earning enough to eventually afford my own place, but then again, I wasn't taking that dangerous leap that McCandless was by voluntarily recreating the ethos of "Walden". Whatever the case, I understood the freedom and adventure of living by your teeth every day- the fact that I enjoyed it far less than McCandless appeared to only speaks of my own common shared insecurity with the "real world" as well as his own quixotic journey.
If anyone's read the book, they know it's kind of a peculiar tome to adapt. It reads almost like a dual detective story- why did the young McCandless forsake everything in his life to head into the dangers of the wilderness? And what exactly was his journey- did he ever discover what he really wanted before he was found dead two years after his initial trip? The latter point is observed through accounts from those that had encountered McCandless during his adventures, a collection of people who remarked at how odd it was for a boy of that age to be wandering alone by choice, considering his noted intelligence and likeability. What sticks out in the book is the arbitrary nature of his journey- he struck out without warning, surprising friends and family, and seemed to have no pattern or plan as to what he would do after reaching the wilds of Alaska. The eyewitnesses constantly make remarks in the book as if to say, "What was it about that boy that seemed different?" when the real answer was probably they were stunned that they encountered a stranger so young in some of the deadest places in the country that could actually spit out entire sentences and not sound like an invalid.
Sean Penn, however, makes a series of miscalculations in adapting what's probably an unadaptable book. For one, in making the story cinematic, one has to turn the narrative from secondhand accounts into firsthand recreations, hypothetical representations of McCandless' journey from his eyes. The tragedy of the book is that, considering how little we know, we realize McCandless is essentially unknowable for readers of the book- a few eyewitnesses can never really communicate to us who McCandless really is. Penn doesn't seem to understand how to keep his character's true motivations hidden from the viewer, and instead documents the story of an easy-going youth, keeping star Emile Hirsch onscreen for close to the entire runtime.
As he makes his trek, we see flashes of his early life, which results in the film's biggest misstep- McCandless' family. His sister (Jena Malone) is given a hunk of voiceover in an attempt to explain how little she really understands about him aside from a series of profundities about his character. But most damning are his parents, played by William Hurt and Marcia Gay Harden. The way the early bits of the film occur, they come across as capitalist pigs who don't seem to understand why their son wouldn't be enamored with the graduation gift of a new car. They are as distant to him as can be, and don't seem to understand that their son is a sovereign explorer from the heart, Hurt with his characteristic WASPy disinterest and Harden with the biggest of her several "Mom" helmet head haircuts she's worn over the years. Early on, there's a reference to the nastiness of the household, as the friction between mother and father is explicated by McCandless' sister. But by the third of fourth time it's mentioned, and a scene of spousal abuse appears in case you didn't get it, and it almost feels like Penn is reaching, looking for a way to explain McCandless' motivations. Random shots of George Bush 1 over the news seem to signify another reason, though they are minor, somewhat flippant insertions that take you out of the film's fairly insular universe.
Surely Penn, a man of strong far left principles in real life, would understand that no one needs a crutch of a reasoning to embark on a preposterous-seeming journey. When he embarked on that dangerous trip in New Orleans to rescue trapped citizens (regardless of whether you think it was only a photo op), does Penn believe that he did that because something in his life triggered that Pavolvian response? Isn't it enough that people were dying and it was the right thing to do? It's as if he doesn't have enough faith in his abilities in his abilities as a filmmaker to declare, "He went into the wild because he needed to be out there. Believe me."
McCandless' interactions seem equally bloated to Hollywood standards, a curiosity considering the difficulty and uncommerciality of Penn's previous films. Here, he's been turned from the charismatic, Herzogian wild man of the book into some wisdom-spouting combination of Forrest Gump and Billy Jack. He first meets a hippie couple of the rocks, and it doesn't even take ten minutes of screen time before he begins to repair their relationship (naturally he reminds them of... well, you can guess). Later, he bumps into drunken temporary boss Vince Vaughn (distractingly doing "Drunken Vince Vaughn" and providing strategically-placed comic relief), nobly turns down sex with a gamine 16 year old (Kirsten Stewart- please eat a cheeseburger, girl) and breaks bread with sexually liberated Swedish tourists (who boogie to MC Hammer- I confess, I don't get why. Time and place?). We get an end-film montage of these people long after we've met them, somehow to signify that, as McCandless slowly starts to die (spoiler, but duh) in some way they mght all be thinking of him at the same time. Penn shows restraint in not showing them mouthing the words to the same song, so, y'know, credit where credit's due.
The only confrontation that registers his a kindly old man that he stays with and attempts to challenge. Played by Hal Holbrook, he develops a kinship with the adventurous McCandless, and at the heart of McCandless' journeys, they spends a large portion of time discussing their differing philosophies. At the point where it's time to say goodbye to each other, the old man has enormous difficulty parting with a youth that's given him a new purpose in life, but mostly given this elderly loner the gift of generous company. Hal Holbrook plays the man, and he does more with his sad eyes in his scenes than any of the actors in this film have done with their whole faces throughout their careers. Okay, that sounds ridiculous, but Holbrook is that good- it's really beautiful work from him.
Holbrook is one of many strong attributes this film has that will probably garner the film a lot of positive notices from people other than me. The score features original songs and arrangements from Eddie Vedder and Kaki King, and they're pretty great and generally unobtrusive. And, superficially, it's hard to get tired of the striking outdoor photography- while I didn't feel close to much of the dialogue or characters, the wordless moments of natural beauty in this film are glorious. But Penn doesn't seem to truly believe in the story- in McCandless' last days, we have some information about him through diaries he had kept, but giving him a pre-death character arc to complete feels too canned and too simple an answer for what was a complex young guy and a hauntingly unresolved story.
-Fabfunk
P.S. Cronenberg reads AICN and he thinks I have an obsession with Viggo Mortensen's "big hairy balls". Blew my mind. www.filmlinc.com
-
+ Expand All
-
Who said Cronenberg isn't into "body horror" anymore.
-
I think
-
Foiled Again! I was not jazzed about this flick when I heard about it...and have a feeling I'd have the same reaction as the reviewer. Sean Penn needs to stay on the other side of the camera...I think his best work as an actor is still in front of him.
-
Into the Wild. Was good, and I can honestly say I understand what this viewer means (in regards to the issue of making him a 'real' person - I mean, you just have to go with fictions, then). Also, I'm amped for EASTERN PROMISES. Anyone read that Cronenberg interview? He always rocks a column, no matter what the interviewer is asking...
-
Despite this negative but well-written review, this is the film I most want to see this fall.
Thank you fabfunk!
www.therecshow.com -
Wow! I had no idea he was in this. Great review. I'm not a huge fan of Penn as Director but, regardless this one looks to be an interesting ride (even if a flawed one at that). Thinking of "outdoorsy in the snow" type movies the trailer for the new Fessenden looks pretty eerie and desolate too, takes me back to Carpenters The Thing. Once again, thanks for the review Fabfunk.
-
I feared this would happen through seeing the previews. This is an articulate, brilliant review of the book, so I'm sure you're dead on about the movie. I taught the book and it's very difficult to get the students to appreciate the enigma of Alex Supertramp. So maybe Penn had the same frustration as my students, wanting to give some explanation for something which was entirely singular. In any case, this is a hell of a well-written review.
-
But I'm afraid I'll be disappointed now too. The only way I could see this being adapted is actually through Krakuer's POV as he researches McCandless's death. Straight narrative is going to be tricky. Great review, fabfunk!
-
Some interviewer did. And as far as I remember the book is not about being Homeless. It is about a kid who has everything going for him in the material world but seeks a greater truth. To compare him to Timothy treadwell (I assume thats what Herzogian means) is way off. The final judgment of the author is that McCandless fully intended to return to society. He was obsessed with Tolstoy and Jack London. This guy is way off, If you ask me.
-
That was a good review. Fucking Sean Penn, he just had to take this and make into a story about him. The thing with GB I on the TV in McCandless house really gets to me. I mean, I'm no republican, but Sean Penn's goddamn inability to not insert his political beliefs into this really pisses me off. I loved the book, and although I think it could be a good movie, from the first time I saw a still of Emile Hirsch sitting on the burnt-out van in Alaska, it just didn't feel right. It would be a real shame if Penn blew this, because this is a story worth telling right.
-
Are not immediately followed by the words, "Jeff Spicoli" in a movie that somehow involves Jennifer Jason Leigh getting naked and Phoebe Cates in a bikini, I feel no interest whatsoever. Sean Penn is boring. Tedious. Madonna ruined him. Everything he has done since "Shanghai Surprise" has been shit. Sorry, it just has been.
-
Hilarious movie, and what a peformance!
-
He bores me. His acting style is "Sean Penn". Spicoli was good. Everything else he's done, not so much. Okay, maybe Sweet and Lowdown. Two for, what, twenty five? Not even sure Sweet and Lowdown wouldn't been better without Sean Penn. But I digress.
As far as being a rock-ribbed conservative coloring my views . . . I like Susan Sarandon, Tim Robbins, John Cusack and lots of other actors and/or actresses that are either implicitly or explicitly leftists, socialist, pinkos, etc. I just don't like Sean Penn because of his Sean Pennishness. You like him? Good for you! -
And he's a mega-lefty. Like, conspiracy-theorist, socialist-utopian Trotskyite. But loved him in History of Violence, LOTR, even thought he was good in that movie where Sandra Bullock tried to play an alcoholic. Eastern Promises looks good, with or without Viggo's hairy balls.
-
Love that film. I only hope that at some point in Eastern Promises Viggo kisses a giant pair of lips on a TV, and then Naomi Watts stick a betamax video cassette into his stomach. Man, I loved that movie. If they ever remade it, Viggo would be a natural for the James Wood role. I'm just saying.
-
... This sounds like it has the same problem that the vastly overrated Perfect Storm (the book and movie) had for me, namely that no one knew what happened to them which makes it all conjecture. I did like this book, but making a movie like this turns it into pure fiction. At least Penn was smart enough to leave out John Krakauer's own self-indulgent personal stories.
-
I Was so worried when I heard this was getting made that they would lose the tone and implied meaning of Krakauer's book. by not demonizing or demeaning Candless, but also not making him into some heroic figure, Krakauer forced you to think of the simple realities of his decisions and the penalties that arose from each one. so we have not a hero, not even a protaganist. just a trail of breacrumbs in human form that we follow to Alaska and the inevitable conclusion. it is simply not a story that can be made into a narrative film, without losing that idea. it's a shame, even with good intentions, good actors, amazing locations and I'm sure amazing music...this movie was doomed to fail in capturing the book.
-
You didn't have a choice being homeless, albeit a couple of mouths. But this insane dude did this to himself.
-
"The Movie That Would Never Ever End" - seriously - it runs a shade under three hours but it feels like ten - if they release a director's cut the viewer will likely die of starvation before the protagonist does - movie had lots of pretty pictures but I don't go to the theater for hours of Nova and a heavy-handed narration that was literally laughably bad - thumbs down
Readers Talkback
User Login
Top Talkbacks
- Whitney Houston 1963 - 2012 -- 325 total posts 322 posts
- New JUDGE DREDD post production footage pops up -- 106 total posts 106 posts
- HANNA's Saoirse Ronan to boss around seven little people -- 63 total posts 60 posts
- Does ‘SNL’ Rhyme With ‘Deschanel’?? Learn Which SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE Vet Hosts After Sexy Zooey!! -- 74 total posts 58 posts
- There's a STAR TREK video game that is going to lead into JJ's STAR TREK 2 apparently... -- 159 total posts 51 posts
- If the Behind the Scenes Pics of the Day drops her pen, pick it up, but don’t look at her legs or else it will be on your record. -- 47 total posts 41 posts
- AVENGERS enemy revealed as pink boardgame pieces... You might suffer some form of elation... SPOILERS!!! -- 161 total posts 34 posts
- To Commemorate The 3D Release Of STAR WARS EPISODE I: THE PHANTOM MENACE, George Lucas Wants You To Know...Greedo Shoots First!! -- 488 total posts 33 posts
- Friday Brings SWEEPS DAY NINE!! Gab Here About Tonight’s FRINGE!! Plus Einstein on TIM, Wiig On PORTLANDIA, MAHER, CLONE, GIFTED, GRIMM, SPARTACUS, SUPERNATURAL, GOLD RUSH And More!! -- 121 total posts 23 posts
- Here's The Red Band Trailer For Drafthouse Films' THE FP! -- 70 total posts 20 posts