Logo

Cool News

Jennifer Hudson likes SEX (AND THE CITY)!!!

Published at:  Sep 11, 2007 4:26:28 AM CDT

Ahoy, squirts! Quint here. Not much for me to say here besides Jennifer Hudson is gonna join the ladies for the SEX AND THE CITY movie happening at New Line. She's going to play Sarah Jessica Parker's assistant in the flick.

The show wasn't exactly my cup of tea, but I can say that I loved Hudson in DREAMGIRLS and it feels like she'd fit in with this group. I just hope her role is significantly more than an extended cameo.




    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 4:31:04 AM CDT

    FIRST!!

    by rocklobster800

    Remeber the last Sex In The City talkback? Great times they were....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 4:33:07 AM CDT

    borrrrrrring

    by barnaby jones

    Does anyone really care about this ?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 4:53:29 AM CDT

    ZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    by flandersbum

    "Sex in the City" is not something that I would ever consider worthy of coverage on this site. But maybe that's just because I'm not a woman living on one of the coasts in her late 30s-early 40s.....I'm sure they're all stoked for this.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 5:00:27 AM CDT

    FIRST!!! (not)

    by bigblackdude

    You first posters kill me. Now you know good n' well you don't give a damn about Jennifer Hudson or Sex in the City; but you just haaaad to post first didn't you. At 4am in the morning I might add. Sheesh.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 5:17:21 AM CDT

    The show where straight women...

    by thomas cromwell

    ...talk like gay men.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 5:34:21 AM CDT

    I like the show...

    by drworm2002

    ...if for no other reason then to hear women talk about blow jobs and see Kristin Davis' breasts.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 5:54:59 AM CDT

    Ah, the BBF...

    by fight this generation

    so who's the S-DMN?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 6:06:28 AM CDT

    Yawn

    by shawn f.

    To quote Triumph the Dog..."The correct answer is 'Who gives a shit?'"

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 6:17:44 AM CDT

    Don't tell Beyone

    by yeti

    she's still sore after that whole Oscar thing.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 6:24:00 AM CDT

    Dammit! I meant Beyonce!

    by yeti

    stuipid keyboard (only good for kicking)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 6:37:10 AM CDT

    WARWICK DAVIES IN...

    by chilli815

    Lets jack this thread.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 6:53:39 AM CDT

    she has big tities .....

    by jeanluc dickhard

    well she does ....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 7:45:25 AM CDT

    I'll Bet She's a Sassy Personal Assistant

    by aquatarkusman

    And I for one hope that the movie is just a ruse to cage up everybody but Kristen Davis and fire them in a rocket aimed at the Sun.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 8:35:07 AM CDT

    Does anyone give a fuck about this movie?

    by turd furgeson

    Have you seen these chicks lately? They look old and done.... I am so fuckiing sick of Sarah Jessica Parker! This thing is going to bomb!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 8:56:50 AM CDT

    So Wanda Sykes retired???

    by nice marmot

    Aint it sad news? Aint it sad... And does anyone think Hudson looks damn fine post weight loss? Or is it just me? OK, fuck it, I thought she looked fine pre weight loss. I like a big booty . . .

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 8:59:43 AM CDT

    jennifer hudson was SO FAT at the vmas sunday night

    by deus vult

    it was DISGUSTING. her legs looked like tree trunks. she is a nasty, no-talent token. she couldn't even read the teleprompter w/o screwing up. and she completely SUCKED in dreamgirls, which was boring and uninteresting.but hey, I'm some choad typing a bitter message on a half-rate website so what do I know?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 9:01:24 AM CDT

    Calm down.

    by gilest

    C'mon, us guys get enough unrealistic wish fulfillment movies, why can't the fairer sex get one too? Unless you're being dragged to it by your girl (there should be a charity for you poor emasculated fcuks), where's the harm?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 9:07:59 AM CDT

    The story of three prostitutes and their grandma

    by beedub

    Thank you, Family Guy.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 9:08:46 AM CDT

    Yeah, must be a slow news days

    by slone13

    Honestly, what percentage of the regulars here do you think give a rat's ass about anything to do with a Sex in the City movie?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 9:34:23 AM CDT

    I love Sex and the City

    by bringingsexyback

    I am not gay.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 9:49:48 AM CDT

    Two prostitutes, their grandma and their horse

    by shoegeezer

    Honestly, when will they remake Mr.Ed. That's the role SJP was born to play.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 9:54:46 AM CDT

    Jennifer Hudson: Fire your Agent

    by pound sand

    A "Sex in the City," movie sounds about as exciting as a "Desperate Housewives" movie. And J-Hud just took on the Alfre Woodard role.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 10:07:01 AM CDT

    The sad reality of Sex in the City...

    by slone13

    ...is that women all over this country aspire to be one of those 4 bitchy women. Yet I would want to kill myself if I were ever forced to spend more than a minute or two with any of their characters in real life, god forbid date one of them.

    It's similar in a way to Seinfeld. No one in their right mind would ever want to be friends with any of those 4 (MAYBE Kramer) because they're so self centered and obnoxious. The major difference between the Sex in the City bitches and the Seinfeld assholes is that the Seinfeld crew is funny. The Sexy in the City women ain't.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 10:37:59 AM CDT

    Remember the last SatC talkback?

    by stuntcock mike

  • Sep 11, 2007 10:42:46 AM CDT

    SEX AND THE CITY 4: CRABS VAJEEN

    by stuntcock mike

    Starring Marion Cobretti. Directed by Paul Williams. HIJACK.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 10:56:55 AM CDT

    As if I needed any other sign...

    by kid z

    ... that the Sex and the City flick was gonna suck!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 10:58:08 AM CDT

    Oh! JENNIFER Hudson...

    by kid z

    ...Christ! I thoughtcha said KATE Hudson... still, my view remains unchanged.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 12:11:15 PM CDT

    That show was vile...

    by bono luthor

    It characterized and glorified everything that was/is unpleasant about a culture that is so far up it's own backside and self centered beyond redemption.

    When a lot of those type of people are old, single and lonely in about 30 - 40 years time and they start to wonder why and how their life came to this, they'll catch SITC on re-re-rerun and go "Oh yeah, it's because I was morally bankrupt, neurotic, and spent my entire life staring up my own backside thinking there is always someone better than the person I am with and Mr/Mrs perfect is right around the corner."

    Our souls would be that much healthier without a movie of this shit.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 12:30:30 PM CDT

    It would be cool if

    by and nicolas cage as fu manchu

    They need to see if the orange orangutan monster from Big Trouble in Little China is available for Samantha's love interest. That's the only way I will ever see this movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 1:13:21 PM CDT

    STICK IT IN HER POOPER

    by turketron

    That's all I will contribute to this talkback. Thanks.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 1:33:38 PM CDT

    Jennifer Hudson has less talent then my pee-hole

    by thornballs

    But a little more than my third toe on my left foot - that thing is fuckin' worthless.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 2:31:06 PM CDT

    Ahhh! Geeks/Nerds & Sexism

    by glodene

    Is alive and well. Calm down monkeyboys - You'll still have your virile whiteman dressed as a flying rodent to look forward to next summer, so give the girls their entertainment. It ain't the end of the world.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 3:03:39 PM CDT

    I loved the series

    by blue meanie 1138

    But I think they waited too long to make the movie. Isn't Kim Cattrall eligible for AARP?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 3:22:02 PM CDT

    Go away Jennifer Hudson...GO Away.

    by therealseveren

    She bugs the shit out of me in interviews. She comes off like a nervous re-re loser on parade. Hopefully, she'll disappear and take Mary J Blige with her... At least Hudson can sing. By the way, I respect all of you.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 3:40:20 PM CDT

    The difference between Seinfeld and SATC

    by deathbird

    The writers of Seinfeld were aware their protagonists were narcissists--hence the well-deserved fate doled to them at series' finale. The Sex and the City scribes, perversely enough, weren't in on the joke. Frankly, I wouldn't want to eat in the same zip code as these people, let alone eat next to them.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 3:55:52 PM CDT

    Glodene...

    by cellar door

    ...Bats aren't rodents.Kristin Davis is hot. Rest of em are not. Nuff said.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 4:01:58 PM CDT

    I thouht we heard the last of her after the Oscars?

    by gqtaste

    I never wanted to see her again.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 4:04:40 PM CDT

    Howabout Rodent-Lookin' and Kristin Davis

    by glodene

    is hot lookin' from the neckdown + she was the most non-sexual of the bunch. If I had to do one of them, I would opt for Kim Cattral because if Menopause looks that good, then give me a taste.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 4:13:47 PM CDT

    she's the sexiest tomboy meatloaf out there

    by pipergates

    shes fat but hot

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 4:30:09 PM CDT

    Shes actually replacing Kim Catrall as Samantha.

    by novaman5000

    They got tired of Kim holding up production.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 4:48:23 PM CDT

    Have to disagree, Sloane,

    by novaman5000

    Kramer was the worst of the bunch. Funny to watch, but IMAGINE having a friend like that. Not only does he help himself to everything you own, but he more often then not ruins it AND anything he puts his hands on.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 5:55:16 PM CDT

    lol

    by maluquiro

    that kramer...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 6:52:12 PM CDT

    did he really say tomboy meatloaf?

    by deus vult

    now come on quint, harry, herc, mori, massa, and everyone else, you've got to agree that's pretty damn funny.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 6:58:10 PM CDT

    Isn't this THE perfect example of something opposite of

    by i dunno

    everything this site is about?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 7:14:09 PM CDT

    Hudson was fucking Awful in Dreamgirls. What the fuck?

    by tallboy66

    Seriously, mass fucking insanity since people actually liked her performance. Did anyone actually watch the "I'M TELLING YOU I'M NOT GOING" song? Jesus fucking Christ! She kept screaming, and yelping, and howling, and sucking and standing there and flailing about -- it was like the film had suddenly turned into a parody of musicals. Jesus Christ, that was fucking awful.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 8:43:47 PM CDT

    gotta get the black audience in there somehow

    by rupee88

    very transparent casting (marketing) decision.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 10:35:47 PM CDT

    Amen to TallBoy's comment

    by thornballs

    After hearing about how great Dreamgirls was for so long I was kind of excited when it came out on DVD. I watched the first twenty minutes and sat there stunned. What a steaming pile of shit that thing was. I fast forwarded to see some of Queen Latifah Jr. since I figured she must have done something to win that Oscar. Nope. Musicals aren't really my thing but I'll give credit where it's due but I would rather watch retarded kids staging a puppet show than that waste of time again.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 11, 2007 11:24:54 PM CDT

    Samantha was funny

    by samsquanch

    But I agree with some of the other posters, if you really take a look at what this show is about, it's about how romance (not to mention feminism) is dead so fuck as many white rich guys as possible and hope one of them (doesn't matter which one, as long as he's white and rich) marries you.

    the disappointing this is that this isn't what female "empowerment" is supposed to look like. Being empowered doesn't mean you're free to "act like gay men", as one funny poster put it. There's nothing here about equality or being progressive, it's not feminist, it's "You Go Grrlism" at it's worst. Women are emancipated! Yay! Let's act like the basest and most despicable male stereotypes we've spent a generation calling society's attention to!

    Like I said, Samantha is a hoot, but the rest of them are hateful and weird.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 12, 2007 2:33:58 AM CDT

    It's a Manimal...or Manthrax.....

    by the duke of madness

    I've always equated this show with what would have happened if Andrea Dworkin had written Seinfeld. Manhating women are always funny.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 12, 2007 2:42:40 AM CDT

    Andrea Dworkin? He's dead.

    by mr_x

    nice job there louw, getting the ethnic minorities in there to appeal to the mass market

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 12, 2007 10:35:15 AM CDT

    ZZZzzzzzzzzzzz

    by faust_8

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback