Home Cool News Coaxial Reviews Zone Chat Contact Us Sign in

A test screening review of the Mike Nichols' directed, Aaron Sorkin scripted Tom Hanks starrer CHARLIE WILSON'S WAR comes in!!!

Ahoy, squirts! Quint here. This flick is one of my most anticipated left in 2007. Was there any doubt that a Mike Nichols directed, Aaron Sorkin scripted flick starring Tom Hanks and Philip Seymour Hoffman would be anything but great? This sounds fantastic. Keep in mind while reading that this is an early review of an unfinished film, but it seems like it's already pretty much there. Enjoy!

Hello Harry, I was lucky enough to get into a showing of the upcoming Tom Hanks/Julia Roberts/Philip Seymour Hoffman film CHARLIE WILSON’S WAR.

I haven’t heard much about this film and wished I had even known what it was about before attending this as it us a lot to process – that said, it’s a uniformly excellent film with some of the best actors we’ve got.

The best way to describe it is to understand it is a Mike Nichols/Aaron Sorkin movie. So its witty, its snarky. Its passionate, socially conscious and quite complicated (both a good and bad quality here) and even subversive in its politica – and by that I mean even the liberals get taken to task.

Charlie Wilson is a great character for Hanks. And a little bit darker than his usual roles.

We first meet him in a Caesar’s Palace hot tub with a crew of cocaine snorting strippers. Still, the tit soup isn’t even enough to drag Charlie’s attention away from Dan Rather on TV in a turban. Dan’s talking about Afghan rebels who are covertly fighting the Soviet occupation of the early 80’s.

Right here I was hooked because essentially these ‘rebels’ transformed over time into the ‘despicable Taliban’ that dear George and Dick are bravely hunting down. The script only hints at the unforeseen effects that this rebel support caused but the irony is certainly there. Its funny, I just looked up the Mujahaideen Army who were the group that sent that open letter to America in 2005: warning about our electing of ‘criminal Emperors’ time and time again.

The movie shifts tonal gears when it gets to Pakistan. And to see the real human suffering that –mostly child – citizens in these countries endure while we’ve just been at a fabulous cocktail party where rich people in gowns are strategizing on how to milk the situation for their own gain…well, it’s a kind of creepy wake up call when I think of my own flippant conversations with friends over what we are doing in Iraq right now. I felt like a total limo liberal. We were giving these people weapons that we knew were USELESS against Soviet helicopters that bombed them!

So Charlie sets out to raise money to get the kind of weapons/ammo that will defeat the Reds. The story becomes a journey of is negotiating of the Congressional shark infested waters to get the money he needs to do this -- all with the crafty help of Joanne who will seduce anyone to get what she wants.

I wont divulge anymore of the plot as its just too darn complicated to describe. But this is a ballsy movie. And one that deserves attention.

No shock here – the dialogue is first rate Aaron Sorkin tongue tinglers. In fact, a little less ‘clever clever’ than STDIO 6 jokes which is fine by me. Here’s two of my faves: (Phil Seymour Hoffman) “I’d like to hold a meeting to review the 10 different ways in which you’re a douchebag” and when asked why Charlie only uses big breasted women as his secretaries, one answers: “Mr. Wilson has a saying – you can teach a girl to type but you can’t teach her to grow tits.”

It all probably sounds a bit HBO-ish - but the superstar version. These people are the best we’ve got: Hanks is a brilliant actor – always finding a way to surprise me. Julia is basically royalty now and owns it so well that her world wariness in the part of Joanne comes off as a kind of ‘grand dame’ role that Bette Davis or Ingrid Bergman did in their work in the 70’s.

Hanks doesn’t grandstand here – just a great character actor when it comes down to it.

Julia is different in this: wiser, cynical and mature. Crafty but righteous. SEXUAL. Which I forgot she could be – she doesn’t seem too concerned about being ‘likeable’….more serving the overall film here. She plays Joanne Haring, the ‘6th richest woman in Texas.” A ‘ weekend ladyfriend’ of Charlie’s and right wing socialite with a huge political agenda.

Like I said, the writing is of course great BUT sometimes the info download (about the ways in which Afghan’s culture was being under siege by Russia, about our own initial half hearted investment in supporting them, etc.) is so dense that I was missing stuff while trying to absorb what I’d just heard. And that’s not good – while filmmakers should never talk down to their audience, making them play catch up is also a frustrating experience.

But hell, this movie is honest – its realistic. It made me think. It wins its goal but then comes back to Earth.

I’ll leave you with this statement Hanks makes after he’s reached his goal. And how in a way its so meaningless.

“As usual, we come in change the politics and leave. But you know what? That Ball? It keeps bouncing…even after we’ve left.”

Ominous. But the truth.

Best.

PENNENINK


AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Click for previous story Talk Back More on this story Click for next story

User login

Reader Talkback

first
by arrangedletters
Sep 7th, 2007
01:01:58 AM
Oh yeah
by arrangedletters
Sep 7th, 2007
01:02:39 AM
Gee whiz
by Geekiller
Sep 7th, 2007
01:30:24 AM
So Geekiller...
by stereochad
Sep 7th, 2007
02:58:25 AM
need to see more of phillip seymour hoffman...
by couP
Sep 7th, 2007
03:04:48 AM
I'm there
by newkie brown
Sep 7th, 2007
03:14:17 AM
GeeKiller and stereochad are absolutely correct
by prunkhaft
Sep 7th, 2007
03:43:11 AM
"You can't teach her to grow tits"
by polyh3dron
Sep 7th, 2007
03:43:26 AM
Plant? Who knows? Still...
by Horace Cox
Sep 7th, 2007
03:46:32 AM
Note to aspiring plants:
by polyh3dron
Sep 7th, 2007
03:46:47 AM
"A little bit darker" for Tom Hanks?!?!?!?
by Mullah Omar
Sep 7th, 2007
03:49:43 AM
A Myth
by MarkWhittington
Sep 7th, 2007
06:11:10 AM
You had me at "tit soup."
by Pound Sand
Sep 7th, 2007
06:51:07 AM
Interview w/ "Charlie Wilson's" co-star Spencer Garrett
by pacino33
Sep 7th, 2007
07:05:53 AM
Excellent review
by indiebum
Sep 7th, 2007
07:30:36 AM
If you actually read...
by HokieSeas
Sep 7th, 2007
07:37:36 AM
Wow, should I PAY to see the Sorkin-Effect(tm)?
by biggles2_22
Sep 7th, 2007
07:39:58 AM
Aaron Sorkin is the worst writer
by JackIsLost
Sep 7th, 2007
08:17:22 AM
The book is really good.
by Drozo5
Sep 7th, 2007
08:44:40 AM
Is this going to confuse me
by CherryValance
Sep 7th, 2007
08:57:36 AM
Hanks shouldn't have been cast in this...
by Osmosis Jones
Sep 7th, 2007
09:09:10 AM
Yesterday the reviews were 'awful, gay and illiterate"
by martianalien
Sep 7th, 2007
09:37:31 AM
This just in...
by jimmy rabbitte
Sep 7th, 2007
10:17:30 AM
Sorkin rules. This sounds great.
by Col. Tigh-Fighter
Sep 7th, 2007
10:58:00 AM
Tom Hanks and Strippers
by Midol Boy
Sep 7th, 2007
11:07:22 AM
BrownCoat Jedi
by Blue Meanie 1138
Sep 7th, 2007
11:37:23 AM
"2 years too late"?
by Mullah Omar
Sep 7th, 2007
11:48:20 AM
:::Mullah Omar::: The Living Daylights had Bond...
by The Dum Guy
Sep 7th, 2007
11:58:42 AM
I'm glad Sorkin is still here...
by TheNothing
Sep 7th, 2007
04:58:01 PM
Sorkin is the biggest hack next to Paul Haggis.
by azmodien
Sep 7th, 2007
09:16:06 PM
anyone comparing Sorkin to Haggis..
by BadMrWonka
Sep 8th, 2007
12:52:38 PM
Agreed about the West Wing comment.
by azmodien
Sep 9th, 2007
10:41:58 PM

Quick Talkback

Please login to post talkback.