Logo

Cool News

A Shy Test Screening Review of LEATHERHEADS with George Clooney!

Published at:  Sep 06, 2007 1:17:47 AM CDT

SPOILER ALERT !!

Hey folks, Harry here... A Shy reviewer sent this mostly glowing review that was disappointed that the film didn't live up to its beginning. First off - this is an early screening, George's film isn't due out till December 7th - which means that the film that Shy saw was - well a bit rough. In the world of comedies, the testing process often benefits them greatly - as this is where they hone the timing, realize how the score needs to lend a hand and what beats to abandon. From the sound of the review, George is well on his way - with plenty of time to hopefully make the right decisions to turn it into a game-saving hail mary. Here's the Shy one...





Harry:

Blah blah Edgewater, NJ blah blah first test screening blah blah "Leatherheads" with George Clooney and Renee Zellwegger.

"Leatherheads" takes place in the 1920s, when professional football seems to have one foot in the
grave and another on a banana peel. Clooney (who also directs) plays a player/coach who recruits a WWI war hero/All-American boy type (John Krasinski, The Office)to play on the team to hopefully revive their fortunes specifically, and the league's in general. Zellwegger plays a reporter tasked with going undercover to prove that his WWI exploits were greatly exaggerated. A romantic triangle forms, hijinx ensue.

Through the first half hour or so of the film, I was thinking about starting this review by saying that there are two Joel/Ethan Coen films being released this year- "No Country for Old Men" and
"Leatherheads". As a big Coen fan, I consider this to be high praise. Certain scenes recall "O Brother Where Art Thou" (a few cast members from this film are recognizable, including Stephen Root) and "The Hudsucker Proxy". However, while Clooney has definitely been influenced by his work with the Coens, the script, while funny in many parts, sputters just as often and just loudly enough to be, in my opinion, unable to consistently deliver on the promise of that first act. Characters as such as other members of the team, characters that the Coens would have had stand out and given their own moment or two in the sun, are indistinguishable here from one another, blending into the crowd like just another goldfish in a tank filled with a hundred of them.

On my way home from the screening and thinking about what I was going to write, I pondered the questions, "Do the people an artist chooses to be influenced by and ultimately decide to emulate set a standard that may be too high for that artist to be held to? And if so, is that fair?" "Leatherheads" is good, very good in spots, and there is an audience out there who will appreciate it, but for people like us, who visit AICN and take the time to say what we like and argue our favorite film's merits, there's a strong possibility that they'll watch this and think about what it could have been with a more consistent script. Ultimately, in my opinion, "Leatherheads" is the film equivalent of a really, really good tribute band.

That being said, this film has the potential to be this holiday season's big date movie, as it combines
romance for the ladies and football for the guys. Clooney swings for the fences, and ends up with a long fly that one-hops the wall. I hope his efforts are rewarded by people not as picky as I was.

No names, please, I'm Shy.


    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Sep 06, 2007 1:20:44 AM CDT

    SOunds promising...

    by therealseveren

    Ill check it out George.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 06, 2007 1:28:10 AM CDT

    Ha.

    by khrono

    Nice ending.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 06, 2007 1:29:14 AM CDT

    Clooney's a smart operator

    by king sweyn forkbeard

    Very few of his films haven't been at the least entertaining (with one obvious exception). This looks worth a rental.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 06, 2007 1:29:51 AM CDT

    I'll give Clooney some credit

    by charon

    After seeing his performance on the big screen in "From Dusk Til Dawn" I thought to myself, "Hey, maybe this guy isn't such a major chode after all." He's been pretty consistent talent-wise since then in the many roles, both acting and directing (some obviously better than others). I'll give this a shot. Even a Tribute Coen Bros Movie is ten times better than most of the dreck hitting the screen recently anyways...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 06, 2007 1:32:57 AM CDT

    Screenplay

    by acorvey25

    I had a chance to read the screenplay and it's actually very well written. Obviously, some of the humor may have been lost during the transition to the screen, but the screenplay itself is consistently funny and quite good. The Coen brothers are a apt comparison to make (especially Barton Fink, Raising Arizona, and the aforementioned O Brother Where Art Thou?). I'm optimistic about this one.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 06, 2007 1:35:57 AM CDT

    why does he make a baseball metaphor

    by maluquiro

    this is a football movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 06, 2007 1:47:01 AM CDT

    vote for clooney

    by pipergates

    the next actor-president to be a liberal and intelligent...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 06, 2007 3:11:24 AM CDT

    Whenever a reviewer says they're shy...

    by bobo_vision

    ...it always sounds like they're coming out of the closet. "No names please, I'm gay." Just pick a pseudonym.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 06, 2007 5:30:12 AM CDT

    Don't overestimate the AICN crowd Shy

    by industrykiller!

    There are some gems left over, but the infiltration from the mainstream is quite transparent and any film, no matter its content, has at least some geniuses who claim its better than sex (Halloween and Transformers please step forward. This old gray mare aint what she used to be.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 06, 2007 6:09:08 AM CDT

    I was a little more psyched for this...

    by buttfuckzydeco

    when it was gonna be Favreau's follow up to Swingers. Lean Mikey could've played some ball. Sauve Georgie could've played with some.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 06, 2007 9:22:23 AM CDT

    Pipergates - vote for clooney? Really, now.

    by guy gaduois

    The Bat-nipples DQ him right away. I don't want to have a president who has worn simulated nipples. As for 'actor president', aren't they all? Or is 'pretender' different than 'actor'?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 06, 2007 11:43:31 AM CDT

    Wasn't Leatherhead that mutated crocodile on TMNT?

    by osmosis jones

    I gar-RON-tee.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 06, 2007 12:00:20 PM CDT

    1925 is NOT the Depression

    by cmnd

    The film takes place in 1925, which was well before the Great Depression.

    That said, I want to see this. When does the trailer come out?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 06, 2007 5:11:33 PM CDT

    The depression started in 1929..the depression ERA can

    by martianalien

    include up to several years prior to that. Also, are we sure its 1925 to be exact?
    Anyhoo - all these reviews quite like the film so I personally am excited to see it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 06, 2007 7:08:24 PM CDT

    TomBodet - wake up!

    by martianalien

    1925 seems to be YOUR take on the date. Both reviews simply said 20's or depression-era.
    Even IMDB and the Universal site merely mention 20's...so get off your high horse.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 06, 2007 8:34:35 PM CDT

    TomBodet is correct

    by cmnd

    The Depression Era is the 30s, and STARTED with the crash in October of 1929. The movie is definitely set in the mid 20's. Did the bear market of 2000-2002 start in 1996?

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback