|
Published on Tuesday, September 4, 2007 - 3:44pm |
|
Harry boards the 3:10 TO YUMA and it's headed for Hell!!!
When you take a month and a half off – travel the country – I can’t tell you how hard it is to get back into the mode of writing about film. Don’t get me wrong, I love writing about film, it’s just for the last month and a half, I got used to doing other things first, choosing to plan things first, drive a few hundred miles first, go get my tuxedo first, etc, etc etc…
Well, on the final day of the Rolling Roadshow trip – Yoko and I pulled into Austin at about 4:47am - that day we’d left Atlanta, driven to Texarkana to watch SMOKEY & THE BANDIT – then decided we didn’t want to sleep in another hotel for as long as we could help it. So we drove from Texarkana to Austin. Then, about 40 miles out of Austin, Quint messages me that I’m making it just in time for 3:10 TO YUMA the next day at 3pm.
Talk about jumping right back into the heat of things. And with a movie I was dying to see. So we got home, unpacked – played with our Nazi dog – each took showers then passed way the hell out. Woke up the next day to have lunch at our favorite restaurant then head to the Alamo South for 3:10 TO YUMA.
This was the first film back from the “not a Honeymoon” trip – first press screening as a married man – and there was something awesome about it being a rougher than a burlap sack, rugged as Jack Palance’s face sort of western.
If studios want to know why Westerns, as a genre, haven’t been huge moneymakers for the past few decades – it’s a pretty simple thing to put a finger on.
With the PC-ification of the United States history – it is next to impossible to make anyone but the United States itself, the bad guy. Can’t have blood-thirsty Indians, guns are bad evil things, you must show that it takes forever to get anywhere in the old west on horseback. So the films are all about how wonderful wide open spaces are, how beautiful nature is – and not at all how badass it was to fucking be a gun slinging six-shooter in the old west that was filled with certain death.
The Western has been a toothless, clawless old hag of a genre for way too long. This is our SAMURAI movies – and the swords cut, the blood flies and the heroes are quiet men whose actions speak louder than words.
3:10 TO YUMA by James Mangold is exactly the sort of Western I have wanted to see get made for a very long time. Just a gritty western world filled with men that’d kill ya faster than they would see ya. A Western filled with cowards and men of principle. Men with a code and men with no code.
I’m tired of the aging decaying West. I want that mythical west were actions were turned into Penny Dreadfuls with lurid acts on every cover. When 50 miles was a quick horse ride – and stagecoaches had gattlin’ guns.
Elmore Leonard’s 3:10 TO YUMA was, for me, always a variation upon HIGH NOON. It was all about an impending deadline that could not be escaped. A situation where no man was your friend… and all men knew you were a walking tombstone. It’s a Kobayashi Maru sort of fucked situation. You can’t win, there’s no Kirk way out of rewriting the game – it was simply fucking an impossible shit situation.
That’s 3:10 TO YUMA. It doesn’t feel that bad for most of it. Taking a prisoner to a train. But the closer you get, the harder it gets. And then there’s one point where something happens that just makes everyone around you turn yellow. What is fascinating at that point is what keeps your hero, the hero. What is he holding on to? Why not give up? Usually in film, it’s because the writer wrote him to be a hero. There’s nothing more to it than that, but here… here Bale isn’t a hero. He’s never been a hero. In his oldest son’s eyes, he’s a coward – worse, he’s a cripple turned coward – scared of risks, terrified to do anything. Here – Bale is watching his son at that precipice – between good and evil and his own life doesn’t add up to a sack of manure, but if that life can be laid down as fertilizer for his son’s to bloom from, then fighting isn’t an option, it’s the only path in front of him.
James Mangold has created a modern classic western. I love the Glenn Ford and Van Heflin version – but it doesn’t have the grit of this. This film is just mean. The cast overall is vastly superior to the original. It isn’t just Bale and Crowe – it’s everyone else. But for me – the real stand out is Ben Foster.
Who?
Warren Worthington III – The Angel from X3. In that film, his character had shit to do. Here – he’s Russell Crowe’s second. His number one man on his team of badasses. In a million years, I never would have thought that the actor that played the Angel in Brett Hackner’s X3 would be worth spitting at, but in 3:10 TO YUMA – he is – THE SHIT! His Charlie Prince is just awesome. He’s death on a horse. He is that loyal sidekick that isn’t lame in the slightest. He’s loyal unto death – and is the face of determined badassness.
I’m about to write up THE ASSASSINATION OF JESSE JAMES BY THE COWARD ROBERT FORD – and these two films couldn’t be further apart in any way – other than quality. They’re both brilliant westerns – but don’t resemble each other in the slightest. That is what rules about The Western. They’re about totally different themes, totally different film styles. In 3:10 TO YUMA – you have a western score that makes you want to throw away the keys to your gas-guzzler and mount up.
This is the best kind of remake, one filled with passion, excitement and exemplary performances from top to bottom. This is my favorite kickass western since THE OUTLAW JOSEY WALES – note the word – “since”. It really is that good!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reader Talkback
Yes!! by BetaRayBill07 | Sep 4th, 2007 03:52:31 PM | Oh Sorry, by the way... by BetaRayBill07 | Sep 4th, 2007 03:56:53 PM | Con Panel was great by powervideo | Sep 4th, 2007 03:57:46 PM | First review in two months by feckdrinkarse | Sep 4th, 2007 04:06:20 PM | Unforgiven? by monkeymafia | Sep 4th, 2007 04:08:20 PM | Best film of the year thus far by Liberty Valance | Sep 4th, 2007 04:11:12 PM | Sounds great. by LoneGun | Sep 4th, 2007 04:23:51 PM | Russell Crowe shoots Ben
Foster to save Christian Bale by Garbageman33 | Sep 4th, 2007 04:28:57 PM | headed for hell??? by ketchuplover | Sep 4th, 2007 04:29:48 PM | A Harry "review" by Lando Griffin | Sep 4th, 2007 04:30:02 PM | PC America? Ruined Westerns? by Guy Gaduois | Sep 4th, 2007 04:35:32 PM | Saw the sneak preview on
sunday. by Bullet_time_Facehugger | Sep 4th, 2007 04:41:14 PM | Ben Foster Who? by Yum Yum Gibson | Sep 4th, 2007 05:11:02 PM | Agree about Ben Foster by buffywrestling | Sep 4th, 2007 05:25:49 PM | 2 reviews in one day!!!! by Turd Furgeson | Sep 4th, 2007 06:05:23 PM | I had to come back by abner pepper | Sep 4th, 2007 06:18:09 PM | I didn't even know Foster was
in this by CherryValance | Sep 4th, 2007 06:25:42 PM | how bout since Dead Man by fish tacos | Sep 4th, 2007 06:45:44 PM | You'd doubt Ben Foster? by Darkman | Sep 4th, 2007 06:58:45 PM | Home, Home on the Range by Ace of Wands | Sep 4th, 2007 07:03:55 PM | Ben Foster was good in Alpha
Dog by StreetTrash | Sep 4th, 2007 07:19:58 PM | Hey Harry Knowles.... by The Real McClane | Sep 4th, 2007 07:52:13 PM | Credit where credit is due by Shad0wfax | Sep 4th, 2007 08:10:11 PM | Thought it was predictable by The Funketeer | Sep 4th, 2007 08:16:38 PM | Harry, we know who Ben Foster
is. by Lenny Nero | Sep 4th, 2007 09:21:38 PM | What was wrong with Dances
with Wolves? by J-Dizzle | Sep 4th, 2007 10:20:00 PM | Was it excellent, or was I
just starved? by Pabodie | Sep 4th, 2007 10:32:16 PM | Could have been better... by scrivener | Sep 4th, 2007 10:38:20 PM | did Harry not see Hostage? by Holodigm | Sep 4th, 2007 10:49:27 PM | He was great in Alpha Dog! by Midol Boy | Sep 4th, 2007 11:06:45 PM | Nitpick much, scrivener? by Liberty Valance | Sep 4th, 2007 11:56:15 PM | PC-fication my arse! by Steve T | Sep 5th, 2007 03:31:21 AM | the problem wasn't the
PC-ification of history by gobofraggleuk | Sep 5th, 2007 09:20:06 AM | Holy shit... by PirateEmery | Sep 5th, 2007 11:01:23 AM | Should have been PG-13. by PirateEmery | Sep 5th, 2007 11:04:31 AM | Return to form? by mozman | Sep 5th, 2007 11:37:23 AM | And that's how I like my
westerns, gobofraggleuk. by Blue_Demon | Sep 5th, 2007 11:41:27 AM | Totally agree Shad0wfax by Swiss Trev | Sep 5th, 2007 12:34:11 PM | Totally agree Shad0wfax by Swiss Trev | Sep 5th, 2007 12:34:36 PM | hmmm...DeadWood, DeadWood.... by Swiss Trev | Sep 5th, 2007 12:35:52 PM | Ben Foster by The Funketeer | Sep 5th, 2007 12:49:23 PM | Yeah, but samurais are so much
cooler than by comedian_x | Sep 5th, 2007 12:57:30 PM | Double Feature by Fineus Fog | Sep 5th, 2007 04:24:34 PM | Remake Magnificent Seven next by Raymar | Sep 5th, 2007 09:29:21 PM | Raymar by Strabo | Sep 5th, 2007 10:29:24 PM | Interview with "3:10 to Yuma"
co-star Logan Lerman by pacino33 | Sep 5th, 2007 11:08:16 PM | Ben Foster has been an
underappreciated actor for
YEARS by ShiftyEyedDog2 | Sep 6th, 2007 03:31:52 PM | scrivener by jfp2007 | Sep 7th, 2007 06:21:35 AM | hell yeah by cahcat | Sep 7th, 2007 12:55:45 PM | I didn't get the same vibe
that you did by CherryValance | Sep 7th, 2007 03:54:34 PM | I was with this movie
guys..buttttttttt..(*(SPOILER!
!*) by Rich Malone | Sep 8th, 2007 02:31:03 AM | gaps in logic by alcester | Sep 9th, 2007 09:48:44 AM | I remember Ben Foster in
Freaks and Geeks by JOHNRCASHFAN | Sep 9th, 2007 07:46:46 PM | PC my ass...it's called the
truth. by Bronx Cheer | Sep 9th, 2007 08:43:08 PM | @rich malone by at0mic-r0ach | Sep 9th, 2007 11:03:53 PM | Two Thirds Classic, One Third
Heavily Flawed by Roboteer | Sep 11th, 2007 07:44:45 AM | Great Performances Overcome
Lame Ending by Dresh | Sep 11th, 2007 04:35:48 PM | Agree with Rich Malone by tcbonline | Sep 11th, 2007 04:41:04 PM | Gosh, Harry... by theJackalope | Sep 11th, 2007 05:44:59 PM | Showers by neptunesblood | Sep 11th, 2007 11:31:28 PM | 3:10 to Yuma is flawed but
still very good by Rupee88 | Sep 12th, 2007 03:23:48 PM | Not regrettable, but not great by strosmer | Sep 12th, 2007 07:59:21 PM | Too bad! by MaxDembo1 | Sep 13th, 2007 03:09:58 AM | Garbageman33 is a fuking kunt by Bishop6 | Sep 13th, 2007 09:55:25 AM | the ending makes total sense by CherryValance | Sep 13th, 2007 10:43:14 PM | Strangest. Cameo. Ever. by WYLD STALLYNS RULES | Sep 14th, 2007 12:58:35 AM | I'm sorry, I also had major
problems with the ending. by Daddylonghead | Sep 15th, 2007 02:14:58 AM | Question about Ebert's review. by Daddylonghead | Sep 15th, 2007 02:22:28 AM | Well I was always partial
to... by Big Dan | Sep 15th, 2007 10:13:39 AM | Explaining The Ending (Heavy
Spoilers!) by Cranston-Is-The-Shadow | Sep 15th, 2007 10:08:16 PM | Big Fat Homosexual Movie Nerds
Gush Over Christian Bale by Bill Maher | Sep 16th, 2007 10:47:15 AM | Thank you, CherryValance by one9deuce | Sep 21st, 2007 06:15:15 PM | Just saw it a moment ago by StarBlitzer | Sep 24th, 2007 11:50:33 PM | Daddylonghead by Proevad | Sep 27th, 2007 07:46:24 PM | The mysterious ending
explained by MattmanReturns | Sep 28th, 2007 01:30:10 AM | And Crowe's last line in the
movie by MattmanReturns | Sep 28th, 2007 01:38:29 AM | That's what I thought,
MattmannReurns by Daddylonghead | Sep 29th, 2007 11:23:21 AM | There was a big clue in the
beginning by MattmanReturns | Sep 29th, 2007 04:56:16 PM | 3:10 to Yuma and breach and
Clayton by emeraldboy | Oct 1st, 2007 12:03:44 PM | A REAL WESTERN! by williamD | Oct 20th, 2007 06:54:10 PM |
|
|