Logo

Cool News

MiraJeff Is Bewildered By THE NINES!!

Published at:  Aug 31, 2007 8:38:53 AM CDT


Greetings AICN, MiraJeff here with a look at John August's directorial debut, The Nines.

It's funny, I was conversing with Shoot 'Em Up producer Don Murphy on Anne Thompson's blog a while back and the question arose - should a critic be allowed to
review a film if he/she doesn't "get" it. I believe the answer is yes, and that the lack of understanding belongs in the review because if a critic, who has a fair amount of cinematic intelligence, doesn't understand the picture, then it's not only possible, but probable that the average viewer won't "get" the film either. Which leads us back to The Nines, a movie that only God Himself could make heads or tails of. Literally.

To say I didn't "get" The Nines would be a severe understatement. That's because The Nines is nearly incomprehensible. Which isn't to say I didn't enjoy it while I watched it. It is built around a potentially brilliant concept that struggles mightily with its own execution. It's one of those frustrating movies that you're confused by throughout, but go along with in the hopes of being presented a final reveal that will make sense of the picture preceding it. Alas, there are no easy answers in The Nines. In fact, the press notes even state that "The Nines is like a riddle where the answer is the question: "How does it all add up?"" I couldn't describe it any better myself because the truth is, it doesn't…. at all. You should ask yourself if that even sounds like a movie you'd be interested in watching? It's okay if you find yourself saying yes, because the premise is certainly intriguing, but if every movie you watched billed itself as a riddle that collapses on itself, you'd go batshit insane in a very short period of time. Speaking of which, perhaps it’s no coincidence that the film’s running time is listed at 99 minutes.

The Nines is sort of what I hope Richard Kelly's Southland Tales will turn out to be like; A metaphysical journey into the surreal. The narrative is broken up into three short films; The Prisoner, Reality Television and Knowing, which is funny in and of itself considering Kelly is or was developing a film with the same title.

In the first segment, Ryan Reynolds plays Gary, an actor on a top-rated TV show called Crim9 Lab, and no, that is not a typo. He gathers a bunch of his ex-girlfriend's closing and burns it, inadvertently burning his own house down in the process before going on a liquor-fueled crack binge that ends in a car crash. Sentenced to house arrest, which he serves in someone else's Beverly Hills mansion (August's actual home in Highland Park), Gary's agency sends Margaret (Melissa McCarthy), a professional babysitter of sorts, to look after him. With nothing but time to kill, Gary hangs out with Margaret and an aggressive next-door neighbor (Hope Davis). He also starts to get creepy phone calls with a whispery voice on the other end repeating "nine" over and over again like something out of a bad German film. Reynolds and McCarthy make a great, if unlikely onscreen duo and they completely sell their characters' blossoming friendship but it's clear that something is amiss and Margaret knows more than she is letting on. When Gary finally dares to step outside his house arrest boundaries, a big CGI-riddled what-the-fuck moment ensues.

The press notes suggest the second segment was born out of a nervous breakdown August suffered in 2000. Playing a thinly veiled version of August himself, Reynolds stars as Gavin, a successful screenwriter-producer who actually owned the house Gary was staying in. Gavin is at work on a pilot called Knowing that he wrote specifically for his best friend Melissa McCarthy, who more or less plays herself. In real life, August and McCarthy are good friends and enjoy a similar relationship. Davis plays a network executive who screws Gavin over and demands he recast Melissa's role for a younger, cuter actress the network has been courting for quite some time. The whole pilot production process is presented as an episode of a fictional reality show called "Behind the Screen" and closely mirrors August's own frustrating experiences in the world of television, where everyone harbors their own secret agendas. Even though I was very interested in this second segment, I don’t think its tone fit with the rest of the movie and I think the average viewer will find it extremely self-indulgent. The behind-the-scenes of the entertainment business is never as interesting as the people who work in the entertainment business find it. See the deserved cancellation of Studio 60 and the current creative funk Entourage is stuck in as examples. The second act ends in a quasi-major twist that leads into the third and least interesting segment, in which Reynolds plays a semi-famous videogame designer named Gabriel whose car battery dies while he's lost in the woods with his wife (McCarthy) and mute daughter (Elle Fanning). Their perilous situation closely mirrors the pilot Gavin was developing. Gabriel goes off to search for help, which he finds in the form of a hiker (Davis) who at first doesn't trust him, but then turns out to be the one who shouldn't be trusted.

What happens after that is anyone's guess. I'm not going to allude to the final scene or try and make sense of the surreal ending. I hesitate to say it's not worth the effort to try, because that would be dismissing August's rather ingenious attempt to play mind games with his audience, but I honestly tried to engage with the story and with whatever August was trying to say, but the message is bafflingly unclear, and ultimately, it falls on deaf ears.

Walking out of the theater, all I could say was 'what the fuck was that,' to which a pair of fellow critics replied, 'I have absolutely no idea.' I really wish I could recommend this movie but it's a race without a finish line, a tie game without an overtime. I have no clue what August was trying to say with this piece and frankly, don't care enough to look any deeper for answers that are buried beneath a bunch of mysterious existential psychobabble. The film explores the relationship between the creator and his creation, so is Reynolds playing God? Are The Nines enlightened human beings who live on a higher plane of existence? Does August think of himself as a Nine? Do we all have a little bit of Nine in us? I have no idea, but I'm pretty happy on this plane of existence with the rest of you, and if that makes me an eight then so be it. Apparently, August explains some of the film's mysteries on his blog but movies aren't designed to be watched with the director's audio commentary. You know the old rule, show don't tell? Well August doesn't leave himself any choice but to tell because the show questions all of reality.

As it so happens, I'm actually a big fan of most of August's work. Go and Charlie's Angels are both very good for what they are and Big Fish in particular stood out and hit me on an emotional level. But ever since re-upping for that awful Angels sequel, he seems like he's been mired in a creative funk. I found the Charlie and the Chocolate Factory remake disappointing, as well as The Corpse Bride, which was as lifeless as its title character. I'm encouraged by early reports of Hancock, the film he co-wrote with director Peter Berg that stars Will Smith as an alcoholic superhero with a PR crisis. A return to big-budget studio pictures may be exactly what August needs, especially as he prepares to rewrite Brian Goluboff's Shazam! script. But The Nines is truly a case of an A-list screenwriter being given the opportunity to make one for himself, without any regard for the audience that has to pay to see his murky vision. And it'd be one thing if August simply wrote the script, but the fact that he directed The Nines means and blame falls squarely on his shoulders. I don’t need my movies spelled out for me but answers aren’t necessarily a bad thing.

Before I sign off, it is worth noting that the three lead performances are all very good, especially Reynolds who segues nicely from comedy to drama. I've always been a fan of his and it's nice to see him challenge himself as an actor. Hopefully he'll balance his studio films with smaller indie films like this one... well maybe not necessarily like this one, but you know what I mean. Even though he's been around for a while, I think Reynolds still has a lot of potential. The Nines shows a side of him that we've never seen before and he delivers on the promise shown in his earlier comedic efforts, but between this and Smokin' Aces, it has not been a very good year for the guy. He's still looking for that one role to define him as an actor, and dare I say, I think he'd make a hell of a serial killer if some producer had the balls to make him shave his head and give him a property like American Psycho to work with. Just look at the career Christian Bale's made out of that breakout role. You watch... we haven't heard the last of Reynolds as far as serious drama is concerned. He has two movies locked and loaded, Chaos Theory and Definitely Maybe, and he'll star in the upcoming Julia Roberts film Fireflies in the Garden. Let’s hope he can turn things around because he really is charming to watch.

As for the ladies, Davis is her usual strong self (I'm not sure we'll ever see her give anything less than a solid performance) and McCarthy was a genuine surprise. I never watched Gilmore Girls but she's certainly on my radar now. It was nice of her to star in August’s vanity project but she should use her influence to get him to write something worthy of both their talents.

That'll do it for me, folks. I'll be back with some pretty major reviews as the Oscar race starts to heat up. I love this time of year. 'Til next time, this is MiraJeff signing off...





    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Aug 31, 2007 8:46:29 AM CDT

    first

    by irc-hollywood

    because i can, again

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 31, 2007 8:48:08 AM CDT

    I think this is good for Reynolds.

    by kikuchiyoboy

    It maybe it'll become routine for him to just keeping trying different things whether they hit or miss.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 31, 2007 8:50:32 AM CDT

    That was a mangled sentence.

    by kikuchiyoboy

    Either way. I think he'll be around for awhile. He's sort of Tom Hanks/Brad Pitt. Sort of.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 31, 2007 8:54:42 AM CDT

    Hope Davis...

    by midnightxpress

  • Aug 31, 2007 9:08:36 AM CDT

    Reynolds as a crazy killer?

    by 7pointedstar

    So you didn't see the Amityville remake? Granted, no actual killing...but he plays a good crazy.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 31, 2007 9:11:41 AM CDT

    Didn't they cancel this show already?

    by osmosis jones

  • Aug 31, 2007 9:19:41 AM CDT

    "Nein" (pronounced like "nine") is German for "no".

    by derlanghaarige

    So it must have been a very bad German film! ^_^

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 31, 2007 9:22:45 AM CDT

    PS: McCarthy was what made me watch Gilmore Girls!

    by derlanghaarige

    First I ignored it and thought it would be one of these usual TV-dramas but then I accidently caught a scene in which Sookie (her character in GG) tried to teach a cat how to drink milk and I couldn't stop laughing! So I also watched the whole episode AND the whole series!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 31, 2007 9:45:33 AM CDT

    breakout role? a psycho?

    by munkie loco

    can any one say deadpool?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 31, 2007 9:47:51 AM CDT

    Reynolds played a killer in...

    by derlanghaarige

    ...one Halloween episode of Two Guys, A Girl And A Pizza Place.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 31, 2007 9:52:33 AM CDT

    As long as they don't re-name it to "The Nin9s".

    by derlanghaarige

  • Aug 31, 2007 10:06:03 AM CDT

    Upside down G's

    by papa lazaru

    So Reynolds plays three characters . Gavin , Gary and Gabriel .
    So what happens if you turn a capital "G" upside down . It resembles the figure 9. Creepy , isnt it ???
    Well... not really, no . I have far too much time on my hands.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 31, 2007 10:08:53 AM CDT

    this still sounds really good to me.

    by pviii

    Seeing it tomorrow.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 31, 2007 10:43:57 AM CDT

    I hear Reynolds wants to play Deadpool.

    by datascream

    yes the Marvel character Deadpool. And to be honest I can kinda see him in the roll. He's got the comedy thing down, and from the looks of it the Flash movie is going nowhere.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 31, 2007 11:49:01 AM CDT

    Someone just spoil this one already.

    by christopher3

    I'm not watching it in the cinema.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 31, 2007 12:35:22 PM CDT

    MiraJeff is a fucking idiot

    by wonderboy123

    This movie was not hard at all to understand. The very end of the movie explains everything that came before it and it makes perfect sesne. John August allows the viewer to concoct their own ideas about what's going on, then gives them the answer at the end. End of story. I am saddended that someone who posts and gets to review movies on this site can't figure this movie out. Retard.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 31, 2007 12:36:27 PM CDT

    BTW

    by wonderboy123

    Reynolds is pretty damn good in this film too.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 31, 2007 1:40:39 PM CDT

    Can't Stand Reynolds

    by drewlicious

    I rarely have this kind of prejudice towards an actor but for some reason I can't stand his face. It reminds of a gerbil and I just impulsively want to smash it. Then again I also found Van Wilder to be unforgivable for various reasons.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 31, 2007 3:06:33 PM CDT

    Oddly enough...

    by redfang

    Salon.com kinda liked it, but seems to think the ending was *over*-explained and a cheat.
    "David Lynch this ain't; you'll go to bed with all your questions answered, and answered with a kind of moon-faced, altar-boy earnestness."


    http://www.salon.com/ent/movies/review/2007/08/30/btm/index1.html

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 31, 2007 3:44:27 PM CDT

    WONDERBOY IS A GOD DAMN GENIUS

    by the real mirajeff

    Wonderboy, thanks for the kind words. It’s not that I didn’t necessarily understand the ending, it’s that I didn’t understand what August was trying to say with it. But you’re right, I felt retarded walking out of the screening, like I’d just been hit over the head with a frying pan. You want the truth? Think you can handle it? Here’s Jack Matthews from the NY Daily News:

    "The Nines" is not about God but about the author as God. August cites his inspiration as the guilt he felt for letting the characters in his aborted pilot down, for leaving them hanging. Now, he has not only brought them back but exalted them. The ending is a disappointment, and I couldn't fit all the puzzle pieces together. But the performances are outstanding. The dialogue snaps, crackles and pops. And confusing as they may be, the stories are never boring.”

    And let’s have a few more critics weigh in. Scott Foundas from LA Weekly calls it a “solipsistic, sub–Charlie Kaufman head-trip…
    and the grand finale—which we understand to be the troubled pilot itself—quickly qualifies as must-not-see TV…Plunging into August's gray matter is more like a season in vacation hell.”

    Lou Lumenick from the NY Post calls it “clever but pretentious… It's sort of as if Charlie Kaufman rewrote "The Fountain."
    And about those answers, let’s hear the NY Times’ Stephen Holden tell it.

    “The fact that the same actors appear in all three chapters gives you the uneasy sense that they might be variations of the same story, set in overlapping universes, in which the female characters, especially those played by Ms. McCarthy, know all the answers, which they are not allowed to reveal.”

    And what about that guy from Salon.com, Andrew O’Hehir. “I honestly can't see much here to discuss…David Lynch this ain't…“The Nines" alludes to philosophical or metaphysical profundity without possessing any…By this time we've kind of figured out the secret of Gary/Gavin's identity, and it breaks those rules I can't talk about and makes "The Nines" a lot less interesting than it seems at first. August's attempts to suffuse the whole thing with ontological or theological meaning are ultimately pretty dumb.”

    And what about TV Guide’s Maitland McDonagh? “The payoff fizzles, but the buildup is intriguing until it topples under its own weight.”

    So Wonderboy, I may not be your favorite reviewer on this site, and I’m sorry that you are saddened by my presence here, but maybe you just exist on a higher plane than the rest of us, since you understand ridiculously contrived movies that just about everyone else describes as a bad head-trip.
    Sincerely,
    MiraJeff the Fucking Idiot

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 31, 2007 5:06:45 PM CDT

    Pretensious shit

    by liljuniorbrown

    I may not win a spelling bee anytime soon but i'll be damned if i'm going to pay 9.50 to have my head fucked with for two hours so that I can pretend to be enlightened. NOOOO THANK YEE

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 31, 2007 6:49:46 PM CDT

    Sounds a bit Lynchian

    by filmfunk

  • Aug 31, 2007 7:24:06 PM CDT

    I Actually Do Want To See That....

    by skoobyx

    But I'm a sucker for pretentious movies that don't make sense. I actually think 'Primer' is one of the best films of the last five years.

    I'm not proud of this. Really.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 01, 2007 1:03:15 AM CDT

    It's weird that you quote DON MURPHY

    by fartgod the irstard

    because it appears that he was so right!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 01, 2007 2:21:36 AM CDT

    lynch and august

    by egomaniac47

    As much as the nines is different from anything Lynch has done and less complex, the groundwork for which they film there movies are the same. At a Q&A tonight John August admitted to not being able to explain everything in his film little by little since sundance. I believe the exact quote was " everything that was in my head was splattered on the wall and the result of that was the nines. to me this sounds somewhat like lynch's style when working on Inland Empire. August admits that he didn't really know what it was all about while lynch is cryptic to the extreme about his films. I truly believe this will garner a cult following from the sold out screening at laemmle and people like me who believe stories come from our interpretations of what we see which are better than anything straightforward filmmakers who entertain with blood and gore, gratuitous nudity, and excessive action scenes. to me this is the most original movie i have seen since Inland Empire and deserves multiple viewings just to see if our opinion stays the same. With what John August accomplished his first time out proves that he will improve with his future ventures. the fact that Mira jeff feels the need to justify his review to some one with other peoples interpretations proves that people will all walk away with something different. Good or bad. We will talk about how much the movie rocks or bewilders after seeing it. And to me thats worth the price of admission alone.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 01, 2007 10:35:13 AM CDT

    Weird for weird sakes is still........weird

    by liljuniorbrown

    If David Lynch,John August and Crispin Glover filmed a three hour movie that only consisted of, first,a solid hour of a midget laughing and dancing, another solid hour of ants eating a dead cow skull then the finale is another hour of Bill Pullman eating his own arm, some people would call it classic cinema and say the rest of us " just don't get it". The truth is either guys like August and Lynch are totaly retarted and sick in the head or they are laughing all the way to the bank knowing they could film any trite shit that they want,call it " a cerebral journey" and make milions off fat political chicks and nerds with " i'm the smartest guy in the room" complex. Few things piss me off from this site, but I just can't stand reviews about self indulgent bullshit cinema. Thats only my opinion though.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 01, 2007 4:26:46 PM CDT

    EGO and SKOOBY

    by the real mirajeff

    Dude, I don't feel the need to justify my review whatsoever. I just wanted to illustrate that I'm not the only one who walked out of The Nines scratching their head. I wasn't giving examples of other reviews to show that I'm right. There is no right and wrong. I could care less what other critics think, just sayin, there were similar reactions. I'm not the only 'fucking idiot' who didn't get it. The guy who wrote and directed it can't even explain it. And Skooby, I'm glad you brought up Primer. I have multiple notes here to mention it in my review as the sort of mind-fuck head-trip that WORKS. Primer was great, even if I can't fully explain all the science behind the plot. Donnie Darko is another movie that people feel makes no sense but it definitely does and it's also a brilliant film. The Nines strives for that surreal meta-ness but it doesn't quite add up in the end.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 01, 2007 6:49:27 PM CDT

    "You.... you cooked her NINES!!!"

    by spenworld

    Could the title be some reference to "Man with 2 Brains"?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 01, 2007 7:14:45 PM CDT

    Right On Mira...

    by skoobyx

    'Primer' really is something special. I always try to make my friends watch it when they want a movie recommendation.
    A lot of people would roll their eyes at the deadpan dialog and lack of action but its more effective than any of the over the top CGI fests that pass for Sci-fi these days. The part where they watch themselves coming out of the warehouse is just CREEPY. And its not even an actual special effect. Just a simple cut. Nice job on the review, I'd like to see this 'Nines' movie now.

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback