Logo

Cool News

Some Intriguing New Information About SPEED RACER Slips From Susan Sarandon!

Published at:  Aug 26, 2007 1:45:40 PM CDT

Hey, everyone. ”Moriarty” here.

In typically blunt and timely fashion, Steve “Frosty” Weintraub over at Collider.com put up a story tonight that echoes something I heard from Jeremy “Naked Man-Wrasslin’” Smith from Chud.com told me when I saw him after he went to the IN THE VALLEY OF ELAH junket in Hollywood Saturday morning.

Here’s a link.

Everything in the frame will be in focus! And she also confirms it’s rated G

Hope you are all doing well,
Steve


Okay... so what does that mean?

Well, go read that transcript that Steve put up. Sarandon explains the visual approach to SPEED RACER in a more particular way that I’ve heard before. Evidently, they’re using multiple layers of printed information to guarantee that everything in frame is always in focus. Hyper-clarity. As in a cartoon. Unless they specifically add blur, I suppose, as anime often does. Sarandon’s description of the process of working with the Wachowskis is something else... it sounds to me like she did it for the fun of trying something so cutting edge. And I really liked how it sounds like Tommy Lee Jones, in talking to Sarandon about it at this junket, is just as curious about it as anyone else.

The more I hear about SPEED RACER, the more I like it. I have the script for that here, and for the other race movie, the DEATH RACE 3000 latest drafts... they’re in a big virtual stack of scripts that I have to read at some point, and I’m thinking maybe I should just take a day and read them both back-to-back. One giant-budget family film, one SF geek-oriented bloodbath.





Drew McWeeny, Los Angeles




    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 6:16:26 AM CDT

    I stop you

    by bobwalnut

    Busted...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 6:18:30 AM CDT

    hey, wait a minute...

    by cornponious

    ...I thought you had to be at least 2 years old to post here.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 7:13:07 AM CDT

    Well, if I cared or even knew the toon, I might say...

    by jackpumpkinhead

    how nice it is of them to take such great care of the most important parts of a movie project - the focus, looking like a cartoon, and so on - and express my hopes that they won't forget of those small and much less important parts (story, script, acting, directing...), either.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 7:18:13 AM CDT

    ..blah blah..powerful Mach 5..

    by nolan bautista

    ..MACH 5!..i like that part in the song where they repeat Mach 5!
    ..and yes it is a quiet,slow drizzly evening..

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 7:18:26 AM CDT

    That sounds great

    by red_weed

    but i wonder what they'll do to make the actors stand out from the background. it sounds like it'll look great though. I can't wait to see something from this new camera once it's all been treated.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 8:02:16 AM CDT

    wanna see

    by smutpeddlar

    i just wanna see american gangster

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 8:20:07 AM CDT

    So, is no one going to complain...

    by beedub

    ...about how we're not getting a HARD R-RATED version of "Speed Racer", the way they do about every other movie? Weird.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 8:21:28 AM CDT

    what's up with the link?

    by captaincapslock

    it highlights and underlines, but when i click nothing happens.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 8:59:27 AM CDT

    the link is coded wrong

    by sebilrazen

    it's using "a here='" instead of "a href='"

    here's the tiny url http://tinyurl.com/3dsuhr

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 9:43:53 AM CDT

    G Rating=Matrix Revolutions

    by uss cygnus

    Why, Mr. Speed? Why? WHY do you persist?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 10:16:24 AM CDT

    I wont say this should be rated R

    by fridge

    But would it have killed them to at least go with a PG? Then I could have at least gotten some CG explosions.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 10:24:35 AM CDT

    G?

    by laserpants

    Oh, that doesn't bode well. I mean, I don't want it to be a bloodbath, but it should be at least PG.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 10:33:11 AM CDT

    No transvestite action then?

    by el scorcho

    The Wachowskis blow.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 10:47:11 AM CDT

    um...

    by mc-909

    If everything is in focus that sounds like the film will have no depth of field, like video. Hopefully I'm wrong but that doesn't sound very cutting edge.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 10:51:37 AM CDT

    DEATH RACE SPEED RACER

    by mrmysteryguest

    Rated PG-13

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 10:52:54 AM CDT

    G? Why?

    by mayorofsimpleton

    Speed Racer was a very complicated, adult and violent cartoon at the time. You'd think that today it would at least be a PG for the movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 11:06:31 AM CDT

    Is it still Wachowski Bros? or..

    by blue meanie 1138

    Wachowski brother and sister? Just curious.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 11:16:56 AM CDT

    It is actualy starring Tommy Lee as racer X

    by gride9000

    You people have your facts wrong, according to Tuesday's Variety, Racer X will be played by Tommy Lee not Tommy Lee Jones.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 11:23:48 AM CDT

    G is a surprise?

    by bouncy x

    maybe the original was "adult and violent" but from everything i'v seen and read, what aired in north america was an edited and watered down version for the kids. so makes sense that the movie would follow that since its an american movie after all.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 11:52:57 AM CDT

    What no bad guys dying in their exploding cars?

    by brandloyalist

    That was commonplace on the old cartoon Speed would drive them off the road into cliffs and ravines and their cars would explode so violently you'd know there was no chance they could have survived in fact you'd see them screaming in their final moments and there were no GI Joe style wussout parachutes or ejection seats either
    next thing you'll be telling me the script includes punctuation marks and other indicators of natural pauses in the dialog ooooh?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 11:58:25 AM CDT

    G Rated is odd...

    by forsakyn

    Speed Racer should be PG. This movie absolutely needs cars wiping out, exploding, etc - it doesn't need blood, but a body count is something Speed Racer always had in pretty much each episode. I can't imagine the MPAA allowing Speed Racer to have a G rating if drivers are getting killed left and right (granted, in exploding cars - nothing remotely graphic). And yeah, if they drove off their cliffs and screamed, heck - knowing the MPAA - they'd probably want a PG-13. I'm not too concerned - there's no way Speed Racer won't have cars blowing up (and taking the bad guys with them). I just think if they're targeting a G Rating there's no way they're gonna get it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 12:12:39 PM CDT

    a here=""

    by opinionated_bastard

  • Aug 26, 2007 12:49:04 PM CDT

    Slips from Susan Sarandon?

    by derlanghaarige

  • Aug 26, 2007 12:49:46 PM CDT

    "Ah! Oh! Ah!"

    by derlanghaarige

    Fairly Oddparents Speed Racer spoof.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 1:42:26 PM CDT

    I think your reading into that too much Mori

    by mike_d

    It sounds like she was just being sarcastically obvious, I dont think se meant it would be in super-duper clarity like a cartoon.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 1:47:40 PM CDT

    It was known it'll be G month ago

    by andy warhol jr

  • Aug 26, 2007 2:07:10 PM CDT

    everything in focus?

    by badmrwonka

    so they just used a 3-chip camcorder?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 2:53:09 PM CDT

    So instead of racing to the death...

    by fridge

    ...they talk all their problems out like civilized individuals. Wow, cant wait to see that. I'm sure it wont be boring or anything ridiculous like that.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 3:43:57 PM CDT

    To echo everyone else here - Rated G...really?

    by bgdawes

    As a kid, Speed Racer was a big deal to me. That cartoon had balls. I remember an episode where Speed physically beat Sparky because he told Speed not to compete in a race that was going to be very dangerous. I think that episode was, aptly titled, 'The Most Dangerous Race' or it was 'The Fire Race'. At any rate, this isn't as earth shattering as rating a Die Hard movie PG-13 but still, c'mon. Don't cut off Speed's balls.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 4:04:34 PM CDT

    Tranny Wachowski

    by robzass

    Dude Larry Wachowski is one messed up dude. Check this out:

    http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/144000/the_strange_world_of_matrix_cocreator.html

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 4:17:17 PM CDT

    Is it weird that I think Susan Sarandon is hot?

    by alcevious

    No, no it isn't.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 4:25:43 PM CDT

    Everything in focus = VIDEO

    by two

    This is NOT a good idea. Everything in focus means the opposite of 35mm film and cinema. The reason people hate and think that video looks "cheap" compared to film is because video cameras have such deep depth of field that too much is in focus. With film, focus helps direct the eye, and gives it a "cinematic" look... So, personally, I don't think live-action with perfect focus will look "like a cartoon." It'll look like digital video. And that isn't a good thing, generally speaking.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 4:27:43 PM CDT

    A technicolor movie

    by alcevious

    That I could dig.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 5:23:01 PM CDT

    after MATRIX 2 & 3

    by blue meanie 1138

    After burning through so much WB money on those two abortions, its hard to believe any studio is letting them run free again, much less asking them to save bad alien invasion movies. Somewhere, Michael Cimino is slamming his head against the wall.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 6:39:50 PM CDT

    ...about the sex change article above:

    by pencil-man

    -What, no pictures?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 7:36:08 PM CDT

    I'd rather be a...

    by freddie mercury

    wealthy, creative transexual filmmaker than some sort of sour grapes, professional appreciator, armchair director any day of the week.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 7:46:34 PM CDT

    The Wachowskis are STILL brothers...

    by theghostwholurks

    One of them's just completely screwed in the head. Enough to pay someone to whack his naughty bits off.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 7:49:04 PM CDT

    Two

    by thenorthlander

    I was actually thinking the same thing. But she also mentioned 3D stuff so I'm betting it's more complicated than them spending millions of dollars on what would look the same as DV anyway.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 7:51:06 PM CDT

    Dominatrix Reloaded

    by robzass

    Apparently his wife is some nasty dominatrix hooker. It's also reported that he/she gets moody when it has to come to the set dressed as a man.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 9:16:38 PM CDT

    G doesn't bother me

    by wed vid guy

    One could say one of David Lynch's best movies was rated G. "The Straight Story"

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 10:36:04 PM CDT

    Tommy Lee as Racer X?!?

    by mrmysteryguest

    Will he be driving automatic or dick shift, er, stick shift?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 11:17:58 PM CDT

    So cutting edge-- they used it in Citizen Kane

    by danger vole

    It's easy to get everything in focus. You either use a wide angle lense with tons of lights OR, do what they did in Citizen Kane. Mask off parts of the shot, shoot w/ different focal lengths. Do a composite with Optical print. But I'm sure they've found a really expensive time wasting digital way to do it that takes months to render.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 26, 2007 11:36:18 PM CDT

    So long as Betty Rubble isn't played by a fat lesbian..

    by burnhollywood

    ...Or whatever the equivalent is in Speed Racer, this could actually be worth seeing.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 27, 2007 8:42:12 AM CDT

    Yay! We hate gay people!

    by freddie mercury

    Yet I'll bet you shits wouldn't say boo to anyone in public. Viva anonynimity!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 27, 2007 8:57:38 AM CDT

    Camera for Speed Racer

    by father malone

    In case anyone is interested in a bit of movie making tidbit -- the camera that they are using is called the F23, which is the latest from Sony. Its the next generation camera after the F950 which is what RR used in Sin City and GL used in EP 3. Google it if you're interested in the tech specs of the whole enchilada.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 27, 2007 11:40:55 AM CDT

    FATHER MALONE

    by blue meanie 1138

    Is that the same camera that was used for THE LOOKOUT? It was really praised by critics for the "look" of the video. I felt it was impressive, until there was movement (as in the bank heist scene), when artifacts really became obvious (to me, anyway).

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 27, 2007 11:47:25 AM CDT

    So Larry changed his sex to... become a lesbian?

    by stalin vs predator

    Pah! Is that supposed to be shocking? That's been done and, in fact, parodied already!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 27, 2007 12:02:39 PM CDT

    Blue Meanie 1138

    by father malone

    No, in The Lookout they used the Panavision Genesis camera, same used in Superman Returns and Apocalypto for example. I agree with you, its a problem with the Genesis in general, that edge blur when there is lots of movement. My favorite HD cam till now is the ViperCam (used for Zodiac) for example, but I'm sure that the new F23 from Sony is gonna be pretty spectacular as well.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 27, 2007 2:19:38 PM CDT

    Yeah, but...

    by kid z

    ... Will it feature the Mammoth Car?!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 27, 2007 2:21:16 PM CDT

    Maybe they just hate fat people...

    by kid z

    ... not gat people. And every gay person I've ever known has hated fat people like no one else could! Not that there's anything wrong with that...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 27, 2007 4:11:30 PM CDT

    G Rating

    by sokitome

    WTF!!, Everything I saw and read about this got me really excited until I just read that it was going to be G? Why the FUCK would they do that. that has to be a mistake. Gmovies don't make as much as pg or pg13 plus the cartoon was VERY VIOLENT. and to whoever said the american cartoons were edited and therefore a G rating is ok is obviously on crack cuz even with the edited american versions it was still violent. It was the first cartoon I saw that people DIED in, unlike GI JOE where everyone was shooting and no one was getting hit.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 28, 2007 12:17:59 AM CDT

    Hey, McWeeny, here's a novel idea...

    by charles sheen

    Maybe you should read said scripts and get back to us on them, eh? Lord knows this site isn't exactly swimming in original content these days.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 28, 2007 12:43:19 PM CDT

    G Movies Make More On Average

    by saluki

    Than PG or PG-13 and a whole lot more than R. On Average. There aren't many G movies in the first place. Let's face it, this will be PG. Not G. Not PG-13. Sure as shit not R. It will be on the level of your precious Star Wars. This camera is sounding fucking sweet. The Bros. know what the fuck is up. They can chop off whatever they want as long as they keep making kick ass flicks.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Aug 28, 2007 3:28:56 PM CDT

    Pancakes are love!

    by oisin5199

    Great line. Susan Sarandon: Hottest 60 year old ever.

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback