|
Published on Saturday, August 4, 2007 - 11:28pm |
|
AICN EXCLUSIVE! Has Frank Darabont Started Casting FAHRENHEIT 451?!
Hey, everyone. ”Moriarty” here.
Boy, I hope this is true. I read an early draft of Frank’s FAHRENHEIT 451, and it struck me as another one of his exceptional adaptations, where he took everything great about Bradbury’s novel and not only made it work, but actually tweaked it in some very savvy ways.
The key, of course, is casting Guy Montag, the Fireman who is the lead in the film. I’ve heard people wish-list the film and toss out names like Paul Bettany and Matt Damon, but now we’ve gotten a tip that Frank has already picked the guy who he wants to have suit up.
All I know is that I desperately want to be in this film as one of the “books” if Frank ends up using that conceit. Maybe something by John Irving...
Anyway, here’s the rumor. As soon as we can, we’ll confirm this one, and I’m hoping that as Frank winds down on THE MIST, he jumps right into this. It’s been too long since his last film, and it would be great to see two in a row from him.
By way of tipster cred, know this: I gave you boys Billy Crudup as Manhattan well before it went public. Use this as you see fit. Or don't. But my source is [someone who would certainly be in a position to know]. According to him, Frank has his FARENHEIT 451 fireman signed and ready to burn:
Tom Hanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reader Talkback
Perfect! by jdfincola | Aug 4th, 2007 11:37:41 PM | It's okay casting.... by lovethatjoker | Aug 4th, 2007 11:38:48 PM | This movie is a dumb idea... by Batutta | Aug 4th, 2007 11:40:04 PM | I disagree Batutta by jdfincola | Aug 4th, 2007 11:42:15 PM | No, it's about the censorship
of written words... by Batutta | Aug 4th, 2007 11:44:57 PM | From an interview with
Bradbury-- by Batutta | Aug 4th, 2007 11:50:21 PM | This book isn't really about
censorship. by Barry Egan | Aug 4th, 2007 11:51:35 PM | This book is about... by jesuschrist | Aug 4th, 2007 11:57:51 PM | fahrenheit 451... by el_fantomas | Aug 5th, 2007 12:02:06 AM | Hugh Jackman by HBO | Aug 5th, 2007 12:04:52 AM | Tom Hanks is not the best
choice... by Boondock | Aug 5th, 2007 12:06:37 AM | Hanks is too old.... by Tarl_Cabot | Aug 5th, 2007 12:11:18 AM | Screw that. JJ needs him to
play Scotty. by Bronx Cheer | Aug 5th, 2007 12:13:08 AM | Eminem by HBO | Aug 5th, 2007 12:24:18 AM | Darabont, please comment on
your script for DOC SAVAGE! by ABking | Aug 5th, 2007 12:27:41 AM | Great Idea by Z 008 | Aug 5th, 2007 12:35:11 AM | Huge Ackman by jesuschrist | Aug 5th, 2007 12:35:36 AM | Tom Hanks = by El Scorcho | Aug 5th, 2007 12:56:58 AM | I like it... by Kirbymanly | Aug 5th, 2007 01:09:09 AM | How do you not like Tom Hanks? by robzass | Aug 5th, 2007 01:30:10 AM | Wait, wait, didn't Stephen
King write the original 451? by Canada's King | Aug 5th, 2007 01:37:28 AM | Maybe he'll do for this what
he did for DaVinci Code by Magic Rat | Aug 5th, 2007 01:38:02 AM | I like Hanks because of the
way he looks when he thinks by PirateEmery | Aug 5th, 2007 02:16:26 AM | good by mrbong | Aug 5th, 2007 02:17:04 AM | DIORA BAIRD as Clarisse...! by Kirbymanly | Aug 5th, 2007 02:23:11 AM | Yuck.Stunt Casting sucks. by Thylacine | Aug 5th, 2007 02:34:39 AM | Michael Wincott by DOGSOUP | Aug 5th, 2007 03:18:32 AM | Bachelor Party is cinematic
perfection by Dr Gregory House | Aug 5th, 2007 03:44:10 AM | No Hanks. Do Crudup. by psychedelic | Aug 5th, 2007 04:04:43 AM | uuhh- by AllieJamison | Aug 5th, 2007 05:01:08 AM | If you see Tom Hanks, please
just leave him be. by Flim Springfield | Aug 5th, 2007 05:27:19 AM | Hanks sells 'torn/conflicted'
characterization... by Sledge Hammer | Aug 5th, 2007 05:52:35 AM | Hanks? Really? by Philo | Aug 5th, 2007 06:13:50 AM | Hanks? Meh. I'd rather go with
Crudup. by Jakes Nel | Aug 5th, 2007 06:20:35 AM | Psychedelic by ScotFree | Aug 5th, 2007 07:12:41 AM | Book won't translate well. by lost.rules | Aug 5th, 2007 07:47:01 AM | Thanks to Equilibrium I now
envision by cyrent | Aug 5th, 2007 08:01:26 AM | They should leave this alone by palimpsest | Aug 5th, 2007 09:11:59 AM | Terrible casting by HeWhoCannotBeNamed | Aug 5th, 2007 09:15:09 AM | Michael Moore should sue!
People will be confused!!!!!! by Cotton McKnight | Aug 5th, 2007 09:25:03 AM | dresden files canceled by palewook | Aug 5th, 2007 09:25:37 AM | Christ, how about Nathan
Fillon? by HeWhoCannotBeNamed | Aug 5th, 2007 09:26:26 AM | My momma always said to burn
books by Cinemajerk | Aug 5th, 2007 10:02:23 AM | Burn, baby, burn!! by ATARI | Aug 5th, 2007 10:14:03 AM | Tom Hanks is too old for
Montag... by Wungolioth | Aug 5th, 2007 10:41:10 AM | This is the prequel by BrandLoyalist | Aug 5th, 2007 10:59:38 AM | It's about Censorship, people.
by conniebrean1 | Aug 5th, 2007 11:07:59 AM | So Frank! Where's The Thing
sequel? by dirtsandwich | Aug 5th, 2007 11:19:43 AM | This is awesome by Bean_ | Aug 5th, 2007 11:20:40 AM | Meh by Anton_Sirius | Aug 5th, 2007 11:25:25 AM | Tom Hanks by Unlabled | Aug 5th, 2007 11:44:34 AM | You could cast anyone as Guy
Montag. by Orbots Commander | Aug 5th, 2007 11:53:01 AM | I actually like McDonald's
soft serve... by PirateEmery | Aug 5th, 2007 11:53:16 AM | Tom Hanks guarantees it will
be made by tomdpimp2k | Aug 5th, 2007 12:01:26 PM | Terrrrrriiibblleeee by modlight | Aug 5th, 2007 12:46:44 PM | Tom Hanks = People will watch
the movie by antonphd | Aug 5th, 2007 01:04:59 PM | why make a movie of it by antonphd | Aug 5th, 2007 01:06:16 PM | Oh, so it's going to be *that*
kind of a movie? by BenBraddock | Aug 5th, 2007 01:18:06 PM | Le Luthor: Wrong!! by Terry the geek | Aug 5th, 2007 01:28:55 PM | yeah, o.k. by DarthCorleone | Aug 5th, 2007 01:33:13 PM | PirateEmery by Anton_Sirius | Aug 5th, 2007 01:34:35 PM | they should update the concept by misnomer | Aug 5th, 2007 01:56:53 PM | lil wayne as the fireman? by lucid dreamstate | Aug 5th, 2007 02:18:42 PM | Anton_Sirius by PirateEmery | Aug 5th, 2007 03:00:53 PM | It's about video piracy and
peer to peer sharing. by Smash Drama | Aug 5th, 2007 03:14:47 PM | They should have gotten Will
"Hell No!" Smith by Cinemajerk | Aug 5th, 2007 03:54:24 PM | Dolph Lundgren by Cinemajerk | Aug 5th, 2007 03:57:22 PM | DANIEL RADCLIFFE by Cinemajerk | Aug 5th, 2007 03:59:16 PM | HeWhoCannotBeNamed by lovethatjoker | Aug 5th, 2007 04:05:07 PM | LoveThatJoker by HeWhoCannotBeNamed | Aug 5th, 2007 04:32:17 PM | Ridiculous Casting by psychedelic | Aug 5th, 2007 04:57:29 PM | Why the need for another
remake? by TakeItEasyMon | Aug 5th, 2007 05:45:54 PM | Hanks could work, but consider
the following... by Uncle Stan | Aug 5th, 2007 05:53:30 PM | casting. by 13th Librarian | Aug 5th, 2007 05:59:11 PM | Casting Tom Hanks in this... by mr. brownstone | Aug 5th, 2007 06:16:37 PM | awesome... by datachasm | Aug 5th, 2007 07:12:26 PM | Yeah by McClane_Corleone | Aug 5th, 2007 07:18:38 PM | Uncle Stan by McClane_Corleone | Aug 5th, 2007 07:20:22 PM | Yo, redfist! by PirateEmery | Aug 5th, 2007 08:14:01 PM | Darabont? by Evil Chicken | Aug 5th, 2007 08:29:27 PM | TOO OLD!!!!! really, TOO
OLD!!!!! by the_man_from_Rio | Aug 5th, 2007 08:55:51 PM | Heres the news, Bitches by CNN | Aug 5th, 2007 08:58:00 PM | speaking of torn and
vulnerable... by AllieJamison | Aug 5th, 2007 09:05:45 PM | the original still holds up... by Demosthenes2 | Aug 5th, 2007 09:27:06 PM | T.Hanks=Big Budget; Large
Opening. by R.C. the "Wise" | Aug 5th, 2007 10:12:01 PM | Dumb by Seal Pool | Aug 5th, 2007 10:38:02 PM | I could see Daniel Craig... by PirateEmery | Aug 5th, 2007 11:19:53 PM | How come Dakota Fanning isn't
in this one? by LittleDudes | Aug 6th, 2007 01:12:51 AM | since Sean Bean already played
the role in Equilibrium by lynxpro | Aug 6th, 2007 01:14:21 AM | another idea... by lynxpro | Aug 6th, 2007 01:16:09 AM | speaking of Equilibrium... by lynxpro | Aug 6th, 2007 01:17:08 AM | Sam Neill by MattmanReturns | Aug 6th, 2007 01:29:12 AM | Too silver by CuervoJones | Aug 6th, 2007 02:10:29 AM | tom hanks didn't ruin da vinci
code by maluquiro | Aug 6th, 2007 02:12:36 AM | Burce Campbell by CuervoJones | Aug 6th, 2007 02:32:33 AM | Censorship and Age by Abhimanyu | Aug 6th, 2007 03:02:36 AM | 2 words that pretty much
guarantee that I won't see by Lost Prophet | Aug 6th, 2007 05:21:59 AM | Isn't this one on the "Sacred
Unadaptable List?" by jimbojones123 | Aug 6th, 2007 06:04:01 AM | been said before but by Jack the Lad | Aug 6th, 2007 06:06:26 AM | I am sick of AICN talkbacks... by LORDRANDO | Aug 6th, 2007 06:40:37 AM | LORDRANDO by Mr. Nice Gaius | Aug 6th, 2007 09:40:47 AM | And casting Hanks in this... by Mr. Nice Gaius | Aug 6th, 2007 09:44:17 AM | That is, of course, if it's
confirmed. by Mr. Nice Gaius | Aug 6th, 2007 09:45:11 AM | TOO SOON! by Unlabled | Aug 6th, 2007 10:25:40 AM | Casting for "The Chief" by finky089 | Aug 6th, 2007 11:01:55 AM | no no no no no no no by quadrupletree | Aug 6th, 2007 12:09:16 PM | memories, you're a gentleman
AND a scholar! by the_man_from_Rio | Aug 6th, 2007 01:37:08 PM | Hank Toms by the_man_from_Rio | Aug 6th, 2007 01:40:42 PM | Really? by Clonetrooper | Aug 6th, 2007 02:15:36 PM | I saw the original recently by FlipTheFrog | Aug 6th, 2007 03:02:41 PM | Sadly, even a watered down fx
heavy Fahrenheit 451 by ExcaliburFfolkes | Aug 6th, 2007 08:15:46 PM | Ian McShane for Beatty by crackityjo | Aug 7th, 2007 12:07:13 AM |
|
|