Shinebox shines to STARDUST and Half-Ass-A-Thon!!!
Hey folks, Harry here with a newbie to the Drafthouse that got in to this Half-Ass-A-Thon! So take a gander at the event from the Salt Lake side of things...
I feel truly honored to have been able to attend at least one AICN event at the original downtown Alamo Drafthouse before it closed. It was quite a trek for me. I'm a filmmaker based in Salt Lake City and a shoot for our documentary coincidentally brought us within a few days of Half-Ass-A-Thon. We figured, "what the hell?" and pulled our travel back by two days in order to obtain a chance of getting into the event. Doing this was a gamble, you see, because the event was sold out before we left. Well, I'm certainly glad we made it and I'm glad that we were able to get into the event via the standby line. The Original Alamo Drafthouse was the movie palace of my dreams. It was a combination of my favorite old movie palace (the Academy Theatre in Provo, Utah, which has sadly been torn down) and my favorite theatre/bar (Brewvies, in Salt Lake City. I heard the guy who does projection there used to run projection over at the Tower Theatre, again in SLC and he was the first projectionist at a festival (this was a Sundance venue) to burn Quentin Tarentino's print of Reservoir Dogs and that Quentin was really not all that happy about it since I've heard it might have been the first public screening on the film.). The Drafthouse is the kind of place I would be three times a week if I lived in (or anywhere near) the Austin area. Sadly though, I don't live anywhere near the Austin area and, in fact, this was my first time in Austin. Actually, this was even my first time in Texas except for a layover at an airport once. And there wasn't much time to waste, either. We literally got off the plane, got our rental car, checked in to the hotel and went straight to the Drafthouse. It was easy enough to find and not too far from our hotel. After much anxiety about whether or not we'd get in and after meeting more than a couple pretty cool people (cute girls even, too) we got in. The first movie of the night began and I'm not sure I would have been able to wrap my head around it if the Drafthouse didn't serve a very lovely locally brewed Hefeweizen. Wonder Bar was quite an amazing experience. I had never seen anything about this film besides reading about reactions to it at another BNAT. I found this film highly enjoyable despite its preposterous racist overtones. I've been watching a lot of movies from this era lately (Stage Door, Dinner at Eight, His Girl Friday, etc.) and I really enjoy the frantic pacing of the comedy and the cartoonish nature of the drama. And it amazes me that films like these can hit both of those notes so well since it's rare in these days to see a filmmaker with the chops to do it right. Like I said, this film was really charming despite it's racism against any number of people but most offensively so against blacks. The ending musical number with Jolson in his trademarked blackface was beyond belief. The amount of racial stereotypes it walked on the toes of had my jaw dropped to the floor. From the lyrics in the song, to the whole cast of blackfaced actors (and children), the fired chicken machine, the numbers with watermelons…. It was almost too much to bear. The only thing that kept me from cringing and actually getting offended was the date of the film. It came out in '34 and can be seen through the eyes of history, as some type of artifact, and not the predominate feelings of our culture. Besides, all the stereotypes that are perpetuated in this film about people (Russians, blacks, gays, etc) are all 80 years out of date. The amazing centerpiece of the film, however, was Busby Berkeley's musical number. It was actually quite a marvel to see the camera tricks they pulled. People would be hard-pressed to pull the types of tricks with cameras and mirrors without CG touch-ups that they were pulling in this dance number. It was so wonderfully over the top that it made the "Anything Goes" number in Temple of Doom seem like it had documentary realism. Long story short, if you have a chance to catch this movie somehow, it would be worth your time. The next movie was Stardust, but we can move on to that last. The third movie of the evening was Topkapi which was a really cool '60's caper film that started a little cheesy but really got moving and I think it was the best film I saw at Half-Ass-A-Thon (even though I really dug Stardust). I had enjoyed Ocean's 13 when I saw it a few weeks ago, but then watching this and thinking about it in the context of what caper movies should be, it paled in comparison. The thing about this movies and caper movies from the era is that you feel like you're in on the job. Soderbergh's Ocean's movies don't allow you that. They offer you scraps of information and then at the end let you know how smart everyone was. That's fine for them, but isn't as ultimately entertaining. Topkapi was a much more engaging and entertaining film that felt more democratic with the dynamics of allowing the audience in on the heist. And in looking more into the film I found out that Pierce Brosnan is remaking this film as an addition to the Thomas Crown franchise and it actually makes my heart ache just a little bit. I'm just not sure what the point is of remaking movies like this. Especially since you know they won't let Pierce Brosnan get caught. It was the same problem I had with the first Ocean's 11 remake. The original had one of the most bittersweet endings to a caper film ever and when the new, hip, Clooney Danny Ocean hit the scene, there was no way he could lose. In fact, it would have been refreshing for Ocean's 13 to be the tale of their biggest loss. So, my vote is, if you HAVE to remake this film, you also HAVE to make Brosnan get caught. Anyhow, I could say all the things people expect to hear about this film (Ustinov really did deserve the Academy Award, it was fun, the heist was cool, etc) but at the end of the day it was just a fun movie that I'm going to buy on DVD and show as many people as I can get my hands on. The fourth film of the evening was an old Bill Shatner film from his "bottomed-out" period after Star Trek called "Impulse". Unfortunately, this is where jet-lag and lack of sleep factored in, so I was dozing off after the trailer to "The Toy Box" (which was an amazingly pornographic trailer, it was pretty cool) so I left while I could still get back to the Hotel with my eyes open…. Which sucks because I wish I could have stayed awake for the whole thing… So, aside from wussing out at the end, the evening was everything I had hoped an AICN event like that would be and more. If you guys ever want to do something like this in Salt Lake, I know all the right people to make it happen…. But, let's get back to Stardust. I've been excited to see Stardust since I saw the trailer. I haven't read the book in a long time to the point where I barely remembered it. In fact, I couldn't even begin to discuss the differences between the book and the movie. I was planning on reading it again before I saw the movie but Harry managed to dash all of those hopes. I thought I had a good two-month lead-time to get it done but I had another think coming. Stardust is the best of everything that '80s fantasy movies were. This film felt so much like Spielberg directing a Terry Gilliam script it was great. This is the kind of movie I want my kids growing up with. It was simple and it was sweet and it's the kind of movie that you want to watch with a girl. In fact, that was the only thing the film was missing and it was my fault because I didn't bring one with me. It was the perfect date movie. It had plenty of swashbuckling, true-love, fantasy action, bad-ass dudes charging on horses, magic, revenge, etc. In fact, you remember the way Peter Falk described the novel "The Princess Bride" in the film? That's what Stardust is. ("Fencing, fighting, torture, revenge, giants, monsters, chases, escapes, true love, miracles...") But this makes me think that Stardust might have the same problems finding an audience that Princess Bride did. No one saw that movie in the theatres because it truly had something for everybody and they had no idea how the hell to market it. And I have to say, I've showed people the trailer and the reactions are always mixed. And I've tried to convince them that the film would be good despite their misgivings about the trailer ("It's Neil Gaiman," usually works) but there's still apprehension. Princess Bride found its audience much later on video and I would hate to see the same fate befall Stardust. Now, I'm going to bust out a spoiler here, so don't read this if you want to enjoy what's probably the best moment in the movie and worth the price of admission hands down. DeNiro in drag. That's right. DeNiro has a dance number in a skirt and then gets discovered and has his ass beat by a Prince. He's a gruff pirate named Shakespeare, but is actually a gay guy, literally living in the closet for the sake of his reputation. It's really good stuff. The film has the fairly standard fable/myth/star-wars type formula but it's done right here. Yes, there's some cheesy moments, but by the end of the film, you're so sucked in that I thought I might explode if it didn't end the way it did. Seriously, if Michelle Pfeifer would have been able to cut out Claire Danes' heart I would have seriously formed a posse to go hunt her down with people from the screening, the whole audience felt that into the film. There really isn't much left to say about the film that you aren't going to hear from everyone else. The acting was all at the very least capable, the effects were great, the story charming, etc…. But I'm certainly going to drag my kids to see this movie the second I can and not a second too soon, if you ask me. So, I guess you can't get more positive of a review than that. Quit breakin' my balls, but you can still call me ShineBox…
Readers Talkbackcomments powered by Disqus
+ Expand All
June 25, 2007, 4:23 p.m. CST
June 25, 2007, 4:24 p.m. CST
by Lord Thislewick
thrusts his mighty purple headed warrior into her quivering love mound
June 25, 2007, 4:26 p.m. CST
You fucking mutt! You! Keep that motherfucker here. Keep him here! Hail, Atlantis......Hands across the ocean....
June 25, 2007, 4:32 p.m. CST
the water horse trailer looks amazing!!! but they are showing too much in it.
June 25, 2007, 4:41 p.m. CST
by georges garvaren
is bottom the fuck out. ShineBox, if you had stayed awake like a big boy, then you would have realized that. Off with your head!
June 25, 2007, 4:45 p.m. CST
that they REALLY expanded DeNiro's char for the movie. Is it becasue it was for the movie or because it's DeNiro? Like I mentioned in an earlier StarDust TB, the pirate char isn't really that big of a part and in fact, it's hinted that the lady who mends Yavin's(sp?) wounds is indeed the pirate's wife. so has this totally been excercised from the movie or what? I really want to hear a review of someone who's RECENTLY read the book, loves the story, and has seen the movie. Is this a good adaptation with expanded parts for minor char. or have they screwed around with the char. but kept the theme's and the plot points?
June 25, 2007, 5:47 p.m. CST
Why oh why did FOX not give this man the time he needed to do X3! FUCK FOX!!!
June 25, 2007, 6:35 p.m. CST
by barnaby jones
theres always one and me thinks it's going to be this.
June 25, 2007, 7:44 p.m. CST
I first read Stardust in 2001, when I heard that book was going to be optioned, fuck... I cannot fucking wait to see this and hope that it helps move Neverwhere as another Gaiman book to be made. I dug out my Stardust book today, I'm going to reread it in the next several weeks. Can't. Fucking. Wait.
June 25, 2007, 7:56 p.m. CST
can't wait...i love the book...i love gaiman...i love gilliamesque featuers...i love stuff.
June 25, 2007, 8:29 p.m. CST
I just saw the trailer and made the comparison.
June 26, 2007, 3:15 a.m. CST
But Sandman, now THERE's another story!<p>At some point before this comes out, I'll be reading the book. I'm somewhat of an almost-fan of Gaiman. Loved his Babylon 5 episode, love his Sandman work, loved his work with Terry Pratchett on Good Omens, not really feeling the love for his novels yet. I keep trying though, he seems like a really cool guy.
- And The Apparent Title Of The Next TERMINATOR Movie Is... -- 331 total posts 331 posts
- The Next STAR TREK!! Variety Says ATTACK THE BLOCK’s Joe Cornish Is Not Directing And Alex Kurtzman Is Not Writing!! -- 290 total posts 290 posts
- Some Cool Images Preview The Upcoming Trailer From Tom Cruise's EDGE OF TOMORROW!! -- 132 total posts 132 posts
- Nordling Recaps BNAT 15! -- 103 total posts 103 posts
- Peter Berg Says No New FRIDAY NIGHT LIGHTS Movie -- 82 total posts 82 posts
- Big SPOILERS for X-MEN: DAYS OF FUTURE PAST and APOCALYPSE as new rumors suggest a familiar face will be playing the role of APOCALYPSE!! -- 493 total posts 67 posts
- Disney can now make new Indiana Jones Movies!!! But what about Paramount? -- 535 total posts 65 posts
- Images From Matt Smith's Final DOCTOR WHO Episode - 'The Time of the Doctor'!! -- 53 total posts 53 posts
- The Trailer For The Wachowskis' JUPITER ASCENDING! -- 36 total posts 36 posts
- Jerry Bruckheimer has returned to Paramount and Brett Ratner's BEVERLY HILLS COP IV is now on the way (again)! -- 239 total posts 30 posts