Movie News

Capone With Director John Dahl About YOU KILL ME, PUNISHER 2 (Or Not PUNISHER 2), And More!!

Published at: June 18, 2007, 2:03 p.m. CST

Hey everyone. Capone in Chicago here. There was a time just as the 1980s were wrapping up and the '90s were beginning that director John Dahl was something of a Second Coming to lovers of crime dramas. His holy triumvirate of KILL ME AGAIN, RED ROCK WEST, and THE LAST SEDUCTION brought on a micro-revival of film noir-like films where the villains were often far more interesting than the hapless heroes, and femme fatales again ruled the screen. Dahl has also made one of my favorite films about card players, ROUNDERS, and one of the great stalker-behind-the-wheel thrillers, JOY RIDE. His latest work is called YOU KILL ME, and it's one of the single darkest comedies I've seen in years. It's also a clear return to the type of film and form that made Dahl so exciting in the first place. This film makes a hero and love interest out of an alcoholic hitman (played impeccably by Ben Kingsley), and it even makes actors I've gotten tired of in recent years (Luke Wilson, Tea Leoni) seem fresh and exciting. Above all else, John Dahl is a student of cinema, and I think that comes through in our conversation. Oh, and mild SPOILER WARNINGS throughout, although I don't think John or I give away anything crucial. The first question and answer tell a little bit about the film's ending, but nothing to take away from your enjoyment of the film.

Capone: Even thought I saw the film two or three weeks ago, the lasting image I have from YOU KILL ME is Ben and Tea watching backwards down the hill in San Francisco [she tells him walking backwards down a steep hill is better for the calves or shins or some leg muscle]. They do it a couple of times in the film. I feel like that image is important to the character of Frank because the symbolism of taking smaller steps for the greater good is what Frank learns to do in this film. Or maybe I'm reading too much into those moments... John Dahl: No, absolutely not. That was not scripted. We had an ending with Frank just getting his chip [from Alcoholics Anonymous], and I didn't just want to cut to black from that. I thought it would be great as sort of a summation of the movie--actually I wanted to get the Golden Gate Bridge behind him, but the location where we were shooting, we couldn't get from one part of San Francisco to shoot one shot and then back to do the other one, so we settled for the Bay Bridge--I just thought I liked the idea of them walking together as a couple, just to show that they were in sync together now. Not on cue or anything rehearsed, but they just naturally turn around and start walking away backwards. That was a very deliberate choice.
C: You mentioned the Golden Gate Bridge, and there is a sequence set there where Frank contemplates suicide. And I couldn't help but think of that recent film THE BRIDGE about the unreal number of suicides that occur at that location. As soon as I saw that you were taking the plot from Buffalo to San Francisco, I wondered if there might be such a scene. JD: Because of that movie, the Golden Gate Bridge wanted to have absolutely nothing to do with us. So we built our San Francisco bridge on a soundstage in Winnipeg.
C: So when he's out on that bridge, he's not on the Golden Gate? JD: No. And the tollbooth scene. And we had to steal all the hi-def--we used a hi-def camera to get all those images. We found a strange loophole that because the bridge was built by the federal government, they can't copyright it. If it's built with California tax dollars, you can copyright it. I couldn't shoot city hall in Los Angeles and put a scene in there without their approval. But you can if it's a federal structure. That was our loophole.
C: I have very vivid memories of the Siskel and Ebert reviews of your first three films. I remember because the were at the beginning of this new indie movement, and they were really championing that wave of filmmaking. I think KILL ME AGAIN came out while I was still in college, because to make an effort to seek that film out. People like to put you in that "new noir" category because of those three films, but were you aware at the time that you were re-inventing a genre? JD: I certainly never saw it that way. I've always liked noir films, once I starting learning about them in film school. They're great because they have this graphic sense of lighting, composition, and the stories are more grown up. I like that they deal with things that are very different than where I was raised, really dark and sinister. An ordinary guy finds himself in a huge amount of trouble, and that was always interesting to me. I guess having an art background, I was a little more attracted to the Edward Hopper quality of a noir movie, a painterly quality, without being overwhelmed by it. You still have to tell a story, and those pieces happen to be a part of it. For example, MILDRED PIERCE is almost too good looking. There are some shots…it's a movie where you can get a lampshade on the ground and get the light coming up. It gives you so many more tools as a filmmaker, and I think that's why I was drawn to it. Also, I love the salacious titles. That's what got us involved in my first movie KILL ME AGAIN, the absurdity of being able to get the audience to a point where this woman can say, "Kill me again." And RED ROCK was pieces left over from the first one. I was location scouting in Nevada, and the idea of someone walking into a bar…some of these bars that I was going into and looking at were just so scary…so the scenario of someone walking in and being mistaken for a killer was the idea. LAST SEDUCTION, I always saw it as a low-budget black comedy. It never really occurred to be, the idea that she was a femme fatale as a noir component, I didn't really connect that, in a way. And of course, the two films came out almost together…they were just so ignored by everybody in Hollywood, it was critics and audiences that made those movies, not really anyone in Hollywood.
C: Are you a connoisseur of noir films? JD: Oh yeah. I lived in Santa Monica, and there were these two video stores near my house, and I loved to go and find that offbeat thing. The one I really loved was 8 MILLION WAYS TO DIE [directed by Hal Ashby, from a screenplay by Oliver Stone]. Just finding those kind of movies that I missed the first time around. There were all of these detective movies and noir movies that I just started consuming, two or three movies a day after I got out of film school, and I just fell in love with that genre.
C: Do you acknowledge YOU KILL ME as something of a return to some of the same elements you used in those earlier works? JD: Yeah. I guess what I reacted to was I really liked the script. I got it with Ben Kingsley attached to it. And a lot of times when you get a movie with the actor attached to it, the script isn't any good. There's one great part for one person, but the plot's horrible. I've turned more of those down than movies I've actually made. The things that struck me about this was that I really liked the script. I could see Ben Kingsley as this stoic, simple tough guy in the middle of it. I found myself attracted to the hitman; I've always liked the sub-genre of hitmen. And I loved the guy from the small town going to the big city, and the kind of contrast between Buffalo, which is kind of tight, and San Francisco, which is so free and open. I guess I could kind of relate to that.
C: San Francisco does fell like the wrong place for Frank. He's a guy that doesn't mind walking in the snow and being isolated. JD: [quoting and imitating Frank] "I like the snow." [laughs] I found it all very appealing. The opportunity to do a black comedy…I've written some, tried to get them going…they're very hard. It's very hard for an investor to look at a black comedy and say, "Is this going to work?" because a lot of times they don't work, and it's usually because the ending is really depressing. To get to all that mayhem and get out of it, it's hard. I remember some of the first screenings we did of YOU KILL ME before we'd really figured out the tone, and one guy said, "You know I really did like Frank at first but as I'm watching the movie, I really started to like him. But then I thought, ah, you're going to kill him before the end of the movie." And that's when I thought, Okay, that's good, now we've got something.
C: I think by the time we find out whether Frank lives or dies, you've earned whatever ending you decide to put on it. Obviously, mixing humor and violence is something you've done before with great success. What is the key to striking that balance? You don't want to lose the seriousness of the violence, but you don't want people to think that they can't laugh. JD: I remember when I was a kid in high school in the town I grew up in, in Montana, there was an irrigation ditch that ran through town. And we'd always go swimming in it, and it was illegal to go swimming in it. So my friend and I were swimming in the ditch, and we see a bridge up ahead of us, and we see a black-and-white police car come over the bridge. And we could tell that he sees us because he slowed down. So we kind of got up to the side of the bank and tried to hide under some grass so we don't get a ticket or get arrested. And we hear the cop stop behind us, and start to walk around looking for us. And I don't know what ever possessed me to do this, but I started to [puts his finger under his nose like he's attempting to stop an enormous sneeze]…like I'm going to sneeze, and he started laughing. I think life is like that. Everybody experiences that every now and then, that absurd notion that something bad is going to happen and you laugh. Or, when do you laugh after something bad happens? We all have that natural release valve. At certain points during the day or week, we all experience something, and the absurdity of kind of registers to you, whether it's irony or sarcasm.
C: So did you get caught? JD: I did get caught. We crawled out of the ditch. I think they gave us a warning. I mean, it's Billings, Montana, so we were cuffed and dragged downtown [laughs].
C: Because Ben Kingsley was attached to this script, does that mean he'd already had it figured out in his head, or was there room for negotiation? JD: He had some definite ideas. But ultimately he's an actor, concerned with his thing, and he doesn't really want to worry about the whole thing. And he also wants feedback. When you're doing a film, actors want to know that the person who's behind the camera is in charge of everything and knows what they're doing and make sure they're not a complete idiot. It's kind of like…are you married?
C: Yes. JD: Do you remember your wedding?
C: Sure. JD: "Stand here! Do this! Talk to this guy!" It's this big thing, and you're in the middle of this tornado. And that's the only thing I could think of that's like being an actor, because you're like, "Oh, you're here!" There's people following you around. People with microphone saying, "He's just landed. He's going to makeup." It's a circus. So when they get to the set, having somebody bring them in and say, "How are we going to do this scene?" and giving feedback. But these are professional actors, so it's not going help me telling him how to act. I'll say, here's the room, here's the scene, come in through that door. I've already worked it out, so it's really about making them experience it.
C: There are so many great male actors in this film, but I have to admit Tea Leoni steals every scene she's in. And I'll admit, I have not always "gotten" her. I think she's at her best with darker material like FLIRTING WITH DISASTER, because that is clearly where her strength lies. And unless you've seen that film, she doesn't seem like the likely choice for the role of Laurel. JD: I saw FLIRTING WITH DISASTER, and I just said, I love this person, I love this woman. Her and Gina Gershon were women I'd always wanted to work with. They're tough and they're sexy, like Linda Fiorentino. Tea is just tough and sexy and smart, and I love the kind of edge she has to her. She's just out there. For Tea to do this character, I was thrilled.
C: You also have two of the greatest actors with built-in gravitas: Dennis Farina and Philip Baker Hall. And you need great "heavies" for the films you make. How do you identify the perfect villain?
JD: Once we had Ben and Tea and found someone to finance the movie, that started the process of casting. A lot of times there isn't the kind of money to hire someone like Dennis or Philip, but it's such a low-budget movie, and nobody making any money. I think for guys like Dennis and Philip, it's an opportunity to be in a movie with Ben Kingsley, and it's two weeks of their time. It's not a huge commitment, and they're kind of fun parts, so we were thrilled to get such big names. And because it's Dennis Farina, it kind of takes on a life of its own. The first scene we did with Dennis is the scene where he walks in and shoot Philip. "You should have plowed, Roman." And the next scene we did with him, and it wasn't scripted, was where he walks in, looks at Philip, picks up his cannoli and eats it. It's kind of huge in a way, but he can so get away with something like that.
C: The other person in the film who surprised me was Luke Wilson, again not the obvious choice for his particular part. It's not a laid-back kind of guy, and it's a great change of pace for him. JD: I love the choice that he made as this guy who's heard it all and nothing rattles him. And I love the choice that he made in the Golden Gate Bridge scene when this guy's telling him that he kills people, and he's like, "Hmm." He's so understanding, and he's just such as good choice. I loved it when he was doing it. And I think of him in these bigger, broad movies, but this is also the guy in BOTTLE ROCKET.
C: The idea of a hitman working in a mortuary and finding that he has a talent for makeup and facial reconstruction still cracks me up. JD: He's getting in touch with his feminine side.
C: At least his artistic side. I thought for sure they'd be a scene where a body would come in of someone who had been killed in a way similar to the way he used to kill people, some sort of execution. Maybe because I thought that would happen is a perfect reason such as scene shouldn't be in there. Why was his seeing death from both sides so important? JD: It's funny because there's that exchange between Frank and Bill Pullman where Pullman says, "I'll see you in the morning for work." "What do you mean 'work'?" Pullman walks up to the outside of the funeral home and says, "It's kind of along your line of work." "I'm not going to do it." "I don't give a fuck what you think." And the two of them played that so well with the woman who runs the funeral home. It's kind of funny, but after a while it's like, "Okay, he's working in a funeral home." So I love the fact that it just kind of sneaks in there without it being a "Oh, he's dealing death." Or what she says, "I'd drink too if I had to deal with dead bodies all day." "Oh, I don't care about the bodies." Just that sort of acknowledgment of squeezing it all together. And he's proud of his work.
C: Addictive personalities are so critical to YOU KILL ME. What is so fascinating about people like that? JD: In a way, it's that vulnerability and that weakness. I hadn't really seen it portrayed this way before. When the first woman stands up at the first AA meeting and says, "When I was 21, I got sober, and 10 years later I thought I could take a drink and be okay." It didn't come across to me as being funny in the script, and then we started auditioning people. And I saw this audition tape, and this actress was taking it so seriously and crying, and just started cracking up. And the more earnest and the more serious she is, the sicker it is to find it funny. I'd look around the set after each take, and I'd have tears in my eyes from laughing so much. I don't know why I thought it was so funny. Somebody's trying so earnestly to work that through, and this guy's sitting there smirking. I don't know why that's funny; I still can't figure it out.
C: In case we run out of time here, I want to make sure I ask this question. Your name has been mentioned in connection with PUNISHER 2. Is there any truth or reality to that? JD: You know, I met with them and talked to them about it. I kind of liked the idea of doing a vindictive, kick-ass guy that just shoots people and has no remorse. And the comics have a great sense of humor, but I guess ultimately at the last minute, I just thought it was too serious. If they could get the same kind of humor that's in HELLBOY, that sort of sardonic, throw three guys in a dumpster and set it on fire and walk away with them screaming and kicking. To me, it could have been hilarious, but I guess ultimately it was too much baggage.
C: When your name came up the reaction was pretty favorable. JD: But coming into it with PUNISHER 2, and I wasn't sure if Thomas Jane was or wasn't going to do it. And if not, who do you cast? And they don't want to spend too much money. I don't know, I just felt like I was digging myself in a hole. I'd love to take an action movie and put a really black sense of humor to it, but that's hard to do.
C: Yeah, but you should still try and do it. JD: It would really be fun if you could just literally waste people, like Bang Bang like you're killing flies.
C: Do you have anything else in the wings? JD: There are a bunch of independent things that I'm trying to put together, but it's always casting and finance and arranging those planets basically.

That's our conversation. I have a sneaking suspicion that YOU KILL ME is going to help Mr. Dahl get his planets to line up a little easier for a while. Let's hope so.

Capone






Readers Talkback

comments powered by Disqus
    + Expand All
  • June 18, 2007, 2:01 p.m. CST

    FIRST

    by joshreluctant

    oh yeah. but seriously. fuck the punisher.

  • June 18, 2007, 2:04 p.m. CST

    Red Rock West

    by skimn

    is great

  • June 18, 2007, 2:07 p.m. CST

    Third

    by bobster52

    No comment at this time.

  • June 18, 2007, 2:07 p.m. CST

    The Last Seduction

    by Stuntcock Mike

    Sweet Linda

  • June 18, 2007, 2:11 p.m. CST

    HEY CAPONE

    by tehgreekhammer

    Have you seen this?? http://www.darkhorizons.com/ne ws07/070618c.php The disappointing box-office of "Hostel: Part II" has upset quite a few, most notably its director Eli Roth who says on his blog that it will have an knock-on effect. The most notable one will be a delay in his adaptation of Stephen King's "Cell" - "I am not directing Cell any time soon, and I most likely will take the rest of the year to write my other projects. Which means I wouldn't shoot until the spring and you wouldn't see a film directed by me in the cinemas until at least next fall." He cites the infamous leaked pirate copy of the film as one of the reasons for the damaging box-office, especially internationally. Unlike other movies leaked online and taken with video cameras, "Hostel II" was notably a near DVD-quality unfinished work print. He also adds that the R-rated horror genre is in serious jeopardy after several notable failures this year - "studios feel the public doesn't want them anymore, and so they are only putting PG-13 films into production. The only way to counter this perception is to get out there and support R-rated horror." KEEP MAKING EXCUSES ELI!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  • June 18, 2007, 2:17 p.m. CST

    Punisher 2

    by tonamania

    It's called "Death Wish". Now leave Thomas Jane alone and give the guy a chance to star in a decent film, will ya?

  • June 18, 2007, 2:21 p.m. CST

    They'll never make Punisher how it should be made

    by modlight

    Not comic, not funny, just gritty, angry and enjoyably predictable. You always knew he was going to kill the bad guys, and that is what made it awesome. No inner struggle, no emoting, no lame ass neighbors. Just him, a warehouse, maaaaybe Microchip, and a lot of guns, and no sense of humor.

  • June 18, 2007, 2:23 p.m. CST

    Good interview, Capone

    by palimpsest

    And good to hear that a decent genre filmmaker like John Dahl is getting a bit of respect. Heck, next thing you know, James B Harris will be making another film. Lordy, I loves me some Jimmy Woods in COP...

  • June 18, 2007, 2:26 p.m. CST

    Punisher 2 or Vol.3 #1 as it is.

    by projectionist-punisher

    I'm a big punisher fan going back to 1986. The first film was shit. The Tom Jane film was cool, a little uneven but it works. Now lions Gate wants to do another with a new director/star combo. They have no respect for Jane, he lived and breathed the character for 4 years, he wanted to do a better film. What the hell do they want? I see a former pro wrestler in the next directed by Alan Smithee. Lions gate, at this point you are proving your head is so far up your ass its lapping at your neck. From a punisher fan, leave it alone. You don't know what you got in the property (Jane did but you don't want him.....this is the crazy I'm talking about) so leave it alone. "Just walk away."

  • June 18, 2007, 2:27 p.m. CST

    That would only work as a short, Modlight

    by palimpsest

    24 pages of comic? Maybe 20-30 pages of screen time. You stretch that kind of thing over 90 minutes, you get nothing better than EXTERMINATOR II. Mind you, Robert Ginty's still alive...

  • June 18, 2007, 2:33 p.m. CST

    They Tried the Punisher twice already....

    by SamBlackChvrch21

    They failed twice

  • June 18, 2007, 2:35 p.m. CST

    paLIMPsest, what comic book film has ever been based on

    by projectionist-punisher

    a single issue?

  • June 18, 2007, 2:41 p.m. CST

    Shame he won't get a crack at Frank Castle

    by Steve Rogers

    ...and VERY dispirting to know that the producers are STILL trying to make a Punisher movie on the cheap! Tight-ass motherfuckers! It doesn't have to be mega-bucks, it's a guy shooting people after all, but to try and make a decent action flick for £17m (or whatever chickenfeed the first movie cost) just isn't going to cut it in this day and age. SPEND SOME FUCKIN' MONEY, SHITBIRDS.

  • June 18, 2007, 3:04 p.m. CST

    The Punisher: In The Beginning... (MAX)

    by HeWhoCannotBeNamed

    http://tinyurl.com/yohktf <P> The perfect Castle story. Cheap to film too. Assholes. I'm glad Jane walked.

  • June 18, 2007, 3:06 p.m. CST

    Red Rock West

    by HeWhoCannotBeNamed

    Is still the shit. I actually have that in my "que" to watch again.

  • June 18, 2007, 3:07 p.m. CST

    Where's messi?

    by HeWhoCannotBeNamed

    He knows what I'm talking about.

  • June 18, 2007, 3:16 p.m. CST

    John Dahl on The Punisher 2

    by lost.rules

    "If they could get the same kind of humor that's in HELLBOY, that sort of sardonic, throw three guys in a dumpster and set it on fire and walk away with them screaming and kicking. To me, it could have been hilarious, but I guess ultimately it was too much baggage." FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, GIVE THIS GUY SOME MONEY AND LET HIM DIRECT PUNISHER 2.

  • June 18, 2007, 3:21 p.m. CST

    The woman who directed Green Street Hooligans is...

    by Neo Zeed

    is directing Punisher 2. Joblo did the story a few weeks back.

  • June 18, 2007, 3:25 p.m. CST

    palimpest... or Death Wish

    by modlight

    but I see what your worries would be.

  • June 18, 2007, 3:28 p.m. CST

    The Punisher should be done Sin City style

    by blackmantis

    Very graphic looking...Very stylized...very violent.

  • June 18, 2007, 4:13 p.m. CST

    The one line about the dumpster

    by Grendel745

    shows that Dahl gets the Punisher far more then anyone else seems to. Jane seems to get it, some directors seem to get it, why can't Lionsgate get it? Its not rocket science, its a Punisher movie.

  • June 18, 2007, 4:49 p.m. CST

    They need to do a "semi-sequel" to Punisher

    by Playkins

    Keep Thomas Jane (who I thought was perfect), start it off in New York City, don't even mention the first movie. Just do the "War Zone" story from the 1-6th issues.

  • June 18, 2007, 5:16 p.m. CST

    tehgreekhammer/Eli Roth

    by thegreatwhatzit

    Sure, Eli Roth is a hack; now he's a hack and a whining pussy. He just can't reconcile himself to one fact: HOSTEL 2 sucked, though he'll blame everyone else for its failure. He chastises critics for screening the on-line, pirated print--though he declines to specifically to identify the reviewers (get the gist? He's a liar). The film's financial/critical failure may have dissuaded investors from linking Roth to "Cell" ("From the man who brought you HOSTEL"? Not exactly a ringing endorsement). Roth's rants are predictable, juvenile--and quite sad/pathetic. Roth co-produced 2001 MANIACS; he could learn quite a lot from that film's director, Tim Sullivan.

  • June 18, 2007, 5:36 p.m. CST

    Let's talk about the smashing success of Hostel II!

    by JackPumpkinhead

    I mean, is this an Eli Roth site or what?

  • June 18, 2007, 7:18 p.m. CST

    Roth isn't quite down for the count...

    by The Dum Guy

    At least he'll be able to say the movie made it's budget back. So we can expect to make more people angry within a year and half.

  • June 18, 2007, 7:22 p.m. CST

    Justin Marks' VOLTRON Script Reviewed!!

    by wadi77

    http://tinyurl.com/2dxgwb

  • June 18, 2007, 8:53 p.m. CST

    Joy Ride the film... even worse than Roxette's song

    by leolo

    That puts in perspective John Dahl's work

  • June 18, 2007, 9:50 p.m. CST

    Please, please, please

    by Spidey3SUCKED

    FIND A WAY TO GET TOM JANE BACK ON THE SEQUEL! And then, find a way to move it back to NYC, where the punisher belongs. Anyone buy or see the second Punisher dvd? Wondering if it's worth the upgrade.

  • June 18, 2007, 10:13 p.m. CST

    Did Roth's Blog Disappear??

    by D. Allusion

    I looked for it on his myspace but the last thing he mentions is how excited he is about the movie's imminent opening! (I know it's off-topic, but suddenly AICN's gone quiet on the subject of Eli Roth.)

  • June 18, 2007, 10:43 p.m. CST

    Eli Roth, Rest in Peace

    by thegreatwhatzit

    Roth insists that HOSTEL 2 made its money back ($10 million; wow, what an achievement). It's a lie. The film would have to gross more than $20 million just to break even (TV, radio, print ads, ad infinitum). And various European territories have declined to release the movie (resistant to torture porn). And, sorry, it won't be a megahit on DVD. No wonder that Lionsgate is pink-slipping. I've heard that a nice gig is awaiting him in downtown L.A.; I just hope he'll be more efficient at washing cars than making crappy movies.

  • June 18, 2007, 11:01 p.m. CST

    Voltron Review

    by Playhouse

    Holy crap does that Voltron script review sound like utter shit.

  • June 18, 2007, 11:06 p.m. CST

    thegreatwhatzit

    by The Dum Guy

    factor in overseas (sp?) gains, plus DVD sales and you've got a movie that ends up in the black, just look at Superman Returns.<br><br>The issue ends up not being that it turns a profit, but if it did as well as the last film, which it didn't.<br><br>I'll admit I'll try and back Roth up just for making a movie he believed in, but Hostel 2 was not as good as the original. If I had my say, I would've gone the Devils Rejects aproach and made it where you kinda feel for the killers (imagine someone killing someone that looks similar to a person who raped them, now that's identifying).<br><br>Roth fucked up thinking that we'd care for underdeveloped characters and cookie cutter villians (and don't get me on the whole anti-American undertones).

  • June 18, 2007, 11:28 p.m. CST

    Tim Burton is not directing Believe It or Not!

    by wadi77

    Comingsoon.net

  • June 19, 2007, 12:33 a.m. CST

    "You guys are going to go fucking crazy over the ending

    by The Dum Guy

    I thought that was directed at the scene with the kids playing soccer, or maybe Roth was just trying to sale the ending as "too shocking!".<br><br>I've seen some gross shit (google Bud Dwyer Video to get woozeey or go to South Padre during spring break), so Hostel 2 wasn't exactly shocking.

  • June 19, 2007, 2:57 a.m. CST

    ELI ROTH'S BUD DWYER

    by ImFixingtoDie

    "I thank the good Lord for giving me 47 years of exciting challenges..." Not a dry eye in the house. I smell Oscar.

  • June 19, 2007, 3:35 a.m. CST

    Punisher: In The Beginning - GREAT call

    by Steve Rogers

    That is a fantastic Punisher story. Superb writing, mood, Frank Castle asshole-ery and uber violence. MAKE IT!

  • June 19, 2007, 4:34 a.m. CST

    Good interview

    by Col. Tigh-Fighter

    Sounds like a cool guy. Plus Sir Ben really is very good. Ghandi to Sexy Beast via Schindlers List. What a guy!

  • June 19, 2007, 6:57 a.m. CST

    A Punisher movie...

    by GrubStreeter

    ...would need lots of voice over. In the comics Frank narrates his own adventures, and that's part of what makes them interesting. Oh, and Roth? Still feel like torturing somebody? Look in the mirror. F-in' hack.

  • June 19, 2007, 8:19 a.m. CST

    Torture?…….just read these talkbacks

    by Buffalo500

    You guys who claim to hate Roth so much sure do spend a lot of time talking about him…….even on a John Dahl talkback.

  • June 19, 2007, 10:05 a.m. CST

    Eli Roth's career (the vanishing act)

    by thegreatwhatzit

    Roth is second only to Jesse Jackson as the #1 p.r. whore. I recall, on the heels on CABIN FEVER, that he was invited to join a panel of veteran directors (Wes Craven, Stuart Gordon, Tobe Hooper, et al). Roth showboated the q&a session, hogging the limelght. The real filmmakers camouflaged the tedium with "What an asshole!" grins. Never mind that CABIN FEVER made ony a modest profit, Roth kept referring to it as some sort of blockbuster. This guy is delusional. William Castle made mosty mediocre flms(though I'm impassioned with THE TINGLER and kinda admire MR. SARDONICUS) and slung the bullshit when promoting his commerce. But you loved the guy, he was akin to an eccentric uncle. Roth registers as a smug fratboy (in league with the Clintons) who thinks that he owns the only video camera on campus. The erosion of his career is his own fault--naturally, he has deflected responsibilty by blaming pirates, the Internet, ad infinitum. His only compatriots are this site and "Fangoria" magazine (the latter existng solely as a press release for the studios). Wonder if Tarantino will invite Roth this year's Chritmas party?...maybe if he agrees to herald the other guests by dressing as an elf and ringing a bell on the front lawn.

  • June 19, 2007, 4:28 p.m. CST

    nothing wrong with humourless...

    by RAWHEAD RALF

    ...the song performed by the hit man in the cafe as requiem for castle's impending death was a way cool (and needed) moment in the film...