Logo

Cool News

28 WEEKS LATER - Blissful infection or see a doctor and get rid of it?

Published at:  Apr 23, 2007 1:31:37 AM CDT

SPOILER ALERT !!

Ahoy, squirts! Quint here with an early look at 28 WEEKS LATER, the follow-up to 28 DAYS LATER. I really dug the first film and it sounds like there a lot to dig about the second as well. And I just love Robert Carlyle and can't wait to see him in this thing.

Beware of the spoilers as Lightwave7871 goes through the flick below. It sees release in mid-May.



Hi Aint It Cool Gang...

Lightwave7871 here again, I wrote to you about the Spiderman 3 screening a few days back. I managed to catch 28 Weeks Later the same day at a Fox Screening and have finally gotten round to writing this review, warning though there's plenty of spoilers in here......

28 Weeks Later is the sequel to Danny Boyles original "not a zombie" movie 28 Days Later, directed by Juan Carlos Fresnadillo, who directed the excellent (in my opinion) Intacto. The movie starts off during the same time as the original as the rage infection runs rampant over the British Isles. We focus on a small group of survivors living in a boarded up house who include husband and wife Don and Alice, played by Robert Carlyle and Catherine McCormack, who, we learn have two children who were overseas when the infection initially broke out. All seems fine and the group seem safe until a small boy on the run from a horde of the infected leads seeks refuge in Don & Alice's hideout leading the infected straight to them. This kicks off a frenetic and visceral attack on the house by the infected resulting in only Don escaping, leaving Alice behind when he panics and runs leaving his wife, the boy and the rest of the survivors to their fate.

This opening sets the scene perfectly and reminds you how scary the infected were. After this we're given a brief run of credits that inform us of what has happened in the intervening six months, with the UK being quarantined, the rage virus apparently dying out along with its victims and finally after the Americans send scouts back to the UK the island is declared safe, 28 weeks later.

From here on in we're given the basic set up, that the Isle of dogs in the heart of London has been totally decontaminated of any infected bodies and survivors and refugees are being temporarily housed in the central city area until the rest of London is cleared. All around the US Army and Air force patrol, led by Idris Elba as General Stone and Rose Byrne as the lead military scientist Scarlet, snipers are on the roof of every building "just in case", one of these snipers is Sgt Doyle, played by Jeremy Renner, who initially isn't given much to do but soon comes in to his own. Meanwhile, we return to Don who is now a janitor in the city, meeting his kids he thought he'd never see again, Andy and Tammy, played by newcomer Mackintosh Muggleton and Imogen Poots who was seen briefly in V for Vendetta. The meeting is bitter sweet as the children now have to face up to the reality their mother is dead, while Don, unable to confess his moment of cowardice was the reason for her death, lies about the circumstances surrounding Alice's death.

Still feeling understandably upset at the loss, the children decide to break out of the city to return to their original home to recover some personal belongings, Andy wants a photo of his mum in case he "forgets her" and its once the children get to the home they discover, as do the Army who have been tracking the children since they escaped, that Alice isn't dead at all...

It seems that Alice, carries a gene that gives her an immunity to the Rage virus but does not neutralise it, effectively making her Typhoid Mary of the Rage infection. And it this small detail that starts everything off again as Don, hearing his wife is still alive decides to see her to ask for forgiveness and to clear his guilt at abandoning her. This culminates in Don kissing Alice and becoming one of the new infected.

From here on in what we're treated to is a combination of Romero's Land of the dead (City sanctuary suddenly becomes a deadly enclosure) and the original 28 Days Later as a small band of survivors of the initial outbreak attempt to escape not only the infected but the military, who are cleared to shoot, napalm and chemically gas everyone once they rapidly lose control of the situation and the infection spreads like wild fire through the city. Scarlet is one of the survivors and once she realises that Alice was resistant to the Rage, she sets out to get Andy and Tammy to safety, seeing the two children as possible carriers of the resistant DNA which could be used to develop an inoculation. Scarlet, Andy & Tammy are joined by Sgt Doyle who abandons his post once he's asked to fire on civilians and the four make a break to escape the city, all the while being stalked by the now infected Don.

Overall there's a lot to like about 28 Weeks Later if you were a fan of the original; while the DV cam graininess has been replaced with standard film, the camera work, especially when you get a POV of the infected is remarkably close to the original. The visual scope of the film has expanded so that rather than a lot of shots of single empty locations we're treated to lots of digitally treated helicopter shots of an utterly dead London which work rather well. There are scenes in this film which almost feel like a fan of the original decided to make shots that were only mentioned in the first film, such as the story told in the original film to Cillian Murphy, about the Rage virus spreading through Paddington Station; In 28 Weeks later you get to see how that sort of crowed rapid infection would have occurred. The acting is competent enough with only Robert Carlyle standing out as Don, especially in the opening sequence, until he becomes infected at which point he simply becomes a cross between Day of the Dead's Bub and a Rage victim. Lost's Harold Perrineau appears as helicopter pilot Flynn, but has little to do beyond sit in a chopper barking at Doyle as the survivors look for an extraction point, although he does get one sequence that almost seems to be a nod to the original; Dawn of the Dead's zombie death by rotor blades which is pretty cool.

What doesn't work is the use of a "hero zombie" in Don, which gives the film a single big bad to be faced and doesn't sit well within the films own internal logic of how the Rage virus works. For me personally, I hate the trend of taking a horde mentality monster, such as zombies, the Alien and the Borg and giving them a Queen or similar that gives the audience something to cheer when its killed as it robs the monster of its faceless horror element. Also once the infected are loose, characters such as General Stone get lost in the pacing as the focus shifts completely to Scarlet & co. Additionally given the high military presence in the safe zone, the idea that two kids can escape to kick everything off in the first place a stretches the credibility, especially given how long the kids are left to run free before the military move in.

But these quibbles aside, once the film gets in to gear after a slow set up, and Don is infected 28 Weeks Later sends you on a roller coaster ride concluding in a suitably apocalyptic way, which those who disliked the happy ending of the first film will find more satisfying. If you didn't like the first film there'll be little to draw you back in as the film does cover a lot of the same ground as the original, but for fans, this film will be a pleasant surprise, its by no means perfect but in the end its a far better film than you would have expected with a greater scope than the original, and a assured grip on the tension, that rarely lets up till the end, leaving you physically exhausted by the time you leave the theatre.....



    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Apr 23, 2007 1:36:38 AM CDT

    First

    by doc_strange

    nottin to say

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 23, 2007 1:36:57 AM CDT

    ain't gonna say it

    by napoleon park

    and the sequel will be a futuristic sci-fi flick called 28 years later

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 23, 2007 1:38:04 AM CDT

    I liked

    by bruce leroy

    28 days later. It had the right vibe or feel to it. Something Resident Evil did not have. I'll go see this one too.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 23, 2007 1:44:05 AM CDT

    Resident Evil could have been good

    by doc_strange

    Had it not been directed by Paul WS Anderson. I thought Milla being cast was great but was the only good thing in a movie that was generally crap with poor direction and a small scope.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 23, 2007 1:57:38 AM CDT

    it's gonna make...

    by damagedinc

    sample s.a.t. question with answer key:

    28 days later is to fletch what 28 weeks later is to fletch lives.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 23, 2007 3:09:02 AM CDT

    hate to break it to you ...

    by darwinwins

    but the military isn't perfect and "running" isn't hard to do.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 23, 2007 3:31:33 AM CDT

    ROBERT CARLYLE GOTTA BE EATEN!!!

    by bannedontherun

    I'm stoked. And 60 percent of my stokedness comes from Robert Carlyle's involvement. The first movie had all the flaws that everyone mentions, but I still loved it. It just had...dare I say it?...that feel. Oh Danny Boyle, the infected, the infected are calling.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 23, 2007 4:53:42 AM CDT

    A few too many spoliers!!

    by teamwak

    You didnt have to give Carlisles fate. The review would have worked without it. Still sounds good!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 23, 2007 5:19:34 AM CDT

    Seriously

    by sithmenace

    The movie can be reviewed without telling the whole story.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 23, 2007 5:50:08 AM CDT

    Spoilers...

    by lightwave7871

    Yeah sorry about the spoilers, but I kinda lost the plot regarding trying to describe how the film works without resorting to spoilers... but I did say in the post it was spoiler heavy... 5 out of 10 must try harder next time.

    Sorry about the carlyle reveal but his fate and how that pans out was kind of one of the issues I had with the film....

    *awaits the calls of being an spoilering Anti plant*


    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 23, 2007 6:07:12 AM CDT

    Idris Elba you magnificent bastard

    by mr_x

    went to school with you, so i cant watch this movie, becasue it just breaks the 4th wall.

    cripes who would have thought it back in the day that you would have become a movie star. fair play mate. RIP Trinity

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 23, 2007 8:06:30 AM CDT

    Sounds like your average

    by ijustlikemovies

    sequel. Bigger not better. Rental.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 23, 2007 8:59:23 AM CDT

    agree about the names

    by durhay

    "Mackintosh Muggleton" and "Imogen Poots" wouldn't be believable character names in a movie. You could just make up names at random like "Dorothy Puddingbossom" or "Reginald MacCrikey" and they'd be believable over there.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 23, 2007 9:01:08 AM CDT

    Can we start getting some damn

    by spectre agent

    reviews w/out spoilers, please. People it ain't hard. Did you like it or not and why. I don't want to know the whole plot.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 23, 2007 10:02:59 AM CDT

    Loved the first one...

    by chief redcock

    ...this sounds interesting too. I'll check it out.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 23, 2007 10:29:33 AM CDT

    Rose Byrne

    by thefreeagents

    is a hottie. Thats all i got.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 23, 2007 11:22:09 AM CDT

    What about a bloody SPOILER WARNING..!

    by workshed

    Talk about ruining the bloody film for us with the Carlyle reveal. Apology not accepted - i was looking forward to this and just wanted to know if it was any good.:-(

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 23, 2007 11:30:50 AM CDT

    Spoiler warning on the main page.

    by telf

    That's what the boxes mean. They say "spoiler" on the side. Maybe it wasn't in a box at first. But it was when I clicked on it. Just saying.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 23, 2007 11:53:52 AM CDT

    Scoffs.....what's next? 28 Month Later?

    by docoholic

    Then ....28 Years Later? *chuckles* Nonetheless, I will see the flick no matter what.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 23, 2007 12:32:05 PM CDT

    Prequel idea

    by palimpsest

    28 MINUTES EARLIER. Largely Cillian Murphy sleeping, though, so perhaps not action-packed...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 23, 2007 2:18:59 PM CDT

    I thought this was a review

    by dr_nerdikus

    Four paragraphs in and all I've read so far is a story synopsis - which means that I don't need to hand over a $10 to see this thing. If you people are going to review a screening - talk about the story yes, but not to the point where you tell the entire freaking plot! Tell us about the gore, the action, the direction, the screenplay, the settings... all can be accomplished without telling us the entire plot. I am sick and tired of these kind of reviews. From now on I'm only reading reviews from Staff contributions. Sheesh.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 23, 2007 2:43:11 PM CDT

    Jesus Christ, People

    by mr. winston

    I counted three spoiler warnings: one in the box that surrounds the post itself, one from Quint, and one within the first two paragraphs from the reviewer. So what was it about three distinct notices that you all didn't pick up on? Cut the kid a break - if you decide to eat moldy bread, don't yell at the baker when you get sick.


    Good review, lightwave - don't pander to the slackjaws. A lot of us appreciate in-depth analysis and synopses. At least we know you actually saw the movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 23, 2007 3:36:32 PM CDT

    Dropping loads all over the victorious zombies!

    by crackerfarmboy

    The first one was okay. The ending was pretty crumby (theatrical one anyways).

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 23, 2007 5:03:08 PM CDT

    meh

    by disfigurehead

    I hate running zombies.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 23, 2007 6:02:03 PM CDT

    Mr. Winston

    by lightwave7871

    Thanks for your comments... I wondered just how many spoiler warnings needed to be around a review and yet people still read them and bitch... Your last comment is ironic really because had I bigged the film up I would have been a plant and if I slagged it off utterly I would have been an "Anti Plant" as well as a spoiler reviewer...

    It does make me laugh though, given the reputation of Aint It Cool for having the scoops on up and coming movies, including plot points, spoilers, images from films not out for months or even in some rare cases, years... What exactly someone expects to read in a multiple spoiler tagged review?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 23, 2007 9:48:57 PM CDT

    For those that missed it earlier...

    by rendell

    Since Robert Carlyle will always be...Franco Begbie turns up in 28 weeks later and he's so mental that everyone thinks he's infected when in fact he's just having a fairly average day!
    One of the infected runs towards Begbie, twitching, snarling, intent on it's next victim. Begbie fixes Infected assailant with a dangerous stare and at the appropraite moment, glasses the infected with a pint glass he just happens to be carrying... in the face! Said infected is momentarily stopped wherupon Begbie gives the infected a swift, hard kick in the Nads.

    Game, Set and Match to the King of the Hibs Casuals.

    Begbie stands trumpantly over the prone, wimpering form of the infected and says "Now get that shite oot 'er yer system 'erfore aah kick it oot!""HO! Rentboy... light me!"*Ewan McGregor comes up and lights Begbie a post coital cigarette.*

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback