Logo

Cool News

The ATONEMENT Trailer Has Pretty Pictures (And War Stuff, Too)!!

Published at:  Apr 16, 2007 8:21:09 AM CDT



Merrick here...




…with a quick follow-up.

A while back. We ran some intriguing set photos from a project called ATONEMENT (based on a World War II-era novel by Ian McEwan. The movie stars Keira Knightly and the super awesome James McAvoy. You can find our original coverage HERE.



ATONEMENT’s trailer was recently unveiled by Empire Online, and offers a “finished” look at some of the sequence whose filming we chronicled in our article. Thought this might be an interesting compare & contrast. LOVE the look of the film (it’s photographed by Seamus McGarvey, who shot WORLD TRADE CENTER).

CLICK HERE TO GET ATONED!!!









    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Apr 16, 2007 8:23:02 AM CDT

    Not sure what I think about this yet...

    by frijole

    But Knightley in 30s/40s period mode can't be ALL bad.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 16, 2007 8:24:20 AM CDT

    Off topic... I just saw Meet the Robinsons.

    by frijole

    And Lasseter has helped Disney wash the taste of crap like Chicken Little, The Wild and a half dozen DTV "sequels" out of my mouth. Walt would have been proud.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 16, 2007 8:33:36 AM CDT

    "Glorious Quicktime" is being a pill...

    by frijole

    and not letting me watch this trailer.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 16, 2007 8:49:04 AM CDT

    Didn't want you to be alone in here, Frijole.

    by onomatopoet

    My friend's cousin babysat Seamus McGarvey's kids, I think while he was shooting High Fidelity. Who wants to touch me? No, really, folks, that's a true story.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 16, 2007 8:54:02 AM CDT

    The book was great

    by jugs

    ...not sure about this yet.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 16, 2007 8:54:35 AM CDT

    RE: War movies

    by onomatopoet

    I don't like war movies in general, and yet some of my favourite films happen to be about war. (Roma, città aperta, Apocalypse Now, Hiroshima mon amour, Idi i smotri...) I don't understand this paradox, but now that I've shared it I feel like a weight has been lifted from my shoulders. Thank you.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 16, 2007 9:01:26 AM CDT

    Keira Knightly is the sexiest wartime beanpole on Earf

    by pound sand

  • Apr 16, 2007 9:02:54 AM CDT

    nice shots

    by darwinwins

    the marching at twilight reminds me of one of my fonder memories

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 16, 2007 10:37:15 AM CDT

    Get Atoned!

    by jabbathegriffin

    That actually made me chuckle Merrick. Thank you.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 16, 2007 11:34:00 AM CDT

    That trailer is an example of why I loved Black Book

    by modlight

    No weepy sweepy shots, no CG "retro era war city scape" shots. No filler... all killer. Jokes aside. Black Book was awesome.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 16, 2007 12:02:47 PM CDT

    Psyche!!!

    by closeencounter

    For just a second there, I thought KK was doing a full monty!! Commenced to drooling, only--NOT!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 16, 2007 12:09:31 PM CDT

    there IS, however...

    by occula

    ...a killer shag scene up against the stacks in the library! i both loved and hated this book, so i'm very intrigued bout the film.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 16, 2007 1:26:24 PM CDT

    I don't think there is enough MEH in the world

    by judge dredds dirty undies

    for that trailer.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 16, 2007 3:53:06 PM CDT

    No talent and no tits!!!!

    by thomas cromwell

    Maybe its just me but Knightley is a waste of space.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 16, 2007 5:22:27 PM CDT

    It's not a war movie

    by stosslova

    Don't be deceived by what you see here: it's absolutely NOT a war movie. It's much more slippery and naughty and deceptive than that.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Apr 16, 2007 5:42:00 PM CDT

    This year's English Patient

    by boxcutter

    Inevitable, really, that they would do this with a novel by turns beautiful, gritty and annoying. Stosslova's right: the book is crafty. But the set-pieces obviously appealed to the producers' ingrained sense of the epic narrative: the library, the note, Dunkirk, the aftermath...OK, no more spoilers. I don't want to prejudge, but there'll be a temptation to "flatten" everything out in a display of plot mechanics over the ritual three acts. And that would be a shame. Because if they even get halfway to attaining that balance of event, subtext, the ambiguous nature of fictive/factual recall that made it so compelling on the page, we could be in for something a bit special. About time too.

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback