Logo

Cool News

Okay... Now You Can See The Real STARDUST Trailer! In Glorious Quicktime HD!

Published at:  Mar 23, 2007 5:59:01 PM CDT

Hey, everyone. ”Moriarty” here.

I really didn’t mean to ruffle any feathers when I ran that link last week to the Russian ShoWest footage that showed up online in Postage-Stamp-O-Rama. Color me impatient because I think STARDUST has a chance at being something really special and fun when it’s released this summer.

Now we can finally get our first great look at footage from the film, and it’s looking good to me. Fans of EXTRAS have got to love the scene where Gervais and De Niro finally get to face off in the film. There’s a lot going on here, and this trailer still just scratches the surface of what we can expect from the finished film.

Check this out:



Here's the trailer for "Stardust," starring Michelle Pfeiffer, Robert De Niro and Clare Danes, based on the novel by Neil Gaiman. It's available in Windows Media and HD QuickTime.


    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Mar 23, 2007 6:01:05 PM CDT

    Sweet

    by john-locke

    Looks as good as I had hoped it would be.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 23, 2007 6:05:47 PM CDT

    Damn this movie should be a lot of fun

    by boondock devil

    Can't even mention how much I'm looking forward to this one. Also Michelle is still looking damn yummy.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 23, 2007 6:14:57 PM CDT

    Pfeiffer really hasn't aged well

    by mrjjonz

    but I do like how they have X3 reverse aged her for part of the movie

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 23, 2007 6:21:45 PM CDT

    ehhh

    by the knight

    I'm on the fence...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 23, 2007 6:29:24 PM CDT

    Looks like alot of liberties were taken.

    by traumnovelle

    I don't remember half of that stuff in the trailer being in the book. It's been a few years since I read the book, and my memory is already really shitty, but...whatever. It also looks more light-hearted than I thought it was going to be. I pictured certain things, like the three witches and king's castle on top of the mountain being really dark and foreboding. A couple of the shots of the witches in the trailer conjured up images of 'Hocus Pocus', that laugh-a-minute Halloween blockbuster from about fifteen years ago. *shudder* Anyway, I will still see this opening night. It looks like alot of fun.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 23, 2007 6:29:36 PM CDT

    Claire Danes IS Gwyneth Paltrow

    by beedub

    It's true!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 23, 2007 6:44:01 PM CDT

    Looks really cool... But methinks a bomb.

    by modlight

    Theyll be lucky to make back the catering budget. Baron Munchausen anyone?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 23, 2007 7:03:19 PM CDT

    I'm mad

    by the knight

    He does all that for a girl and she doesn't even bother to stop him... Am I missing something here? I haven't read the book...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 23, 2007 7:03:24 PM CDT

    I really loved "Layer Cake" but....

    by gozu

    This kind of looks like it was made for the Sci Fi Channel.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 23, 2007 7:09:15 PM CDT

    can't wait for this

    by oisin5199

    finally to see a Neil Gaiman adaptation with a big budget. Mirrormask was cool, but low key. I don't know about the de-aging, but Ms. Pfeiffer hasn't looked this hot in years.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 23, 2007 7:29:43 PM CDT

    HD trailers

    by chromedome

    nice selection at:http://movies.yahoo.com/feature/hdtrailers.html

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 23, 2007 7:41:34 PM CDT

    Why is it only Peter Jackson can do fantasy that doesnt

    by judge dredds dirty undies

    look really fucking stupid and gay. This looks like a TV movie. Who knows maybe its a great film, I bet it will bomb big time though. The fantasy genre is gonna be dead again very soon.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 23, 2007 8:12:11 PM CDT

    Jjonz

    by cuttr

    Are you nuts? Pfeiffer is still amazingly hot. Considering the HD, I think she's held up extremely well. Emminently do-able.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 23, 2007 8:19:39 PM CDT

    looks better than munchausen to me

    by pipergates

    take it not as a lack of disrespect,
    master Gilliams,i bow before yer talents...but even for an enjoyer of surrealism as miself...This film looks more concise and marketable.it has some great actors in funlooking roles.Great settings.Looks like it could be droolabley good.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 23, 2007 8:35:20 PM CDT

    Uh...movie filled with has-beens?

    by aceattorney

    Huh? Who's all excited? Seriously though, doesn't look all that great. It seems to be a film that doesn't take its setting very seriously at all, but fully expects the audience to.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 23, 2007 8:38:05 PM CDT

    Was I the only one?

    by the six fingered man

    Who saw the eyeballs in a jar and thought it was a horrible example of CG?
    I loved the book, and really want this to be an excellent movie, but I hope that was an example of unfinished effects.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 23, 2007 8:48:53 PM CDT

    Judge Dredds Dirty Undies

    by darwinwins

    you're an idiot. let's face the facts -- peter jackson's fantasy was very gay. remember frodo and sam? they were very stupid and gay.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 23, 2007 8:51:17 PM CDT

    "Stupid and Gay"

    by devil by the deed

    Shut up, you violence-seeking retard. Go wank it to 300.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 23, 2007 8:52:53 PM CDT

    Yeah, what exactly gives it that "TV" feel?

    by thelivingdoll

    It just seems like something you'd see an ad for on the Sci-Fi channel.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 23, 2007 9:00:18 PM CDT

    i agree, one of jacksons habitual mistakes

    by pipergates

    he had that same over-emotional tone in king kong too.and a hacky heavyhandedness and misplaced tacky gore-horror in films that are supposed to be dramas.many good things about LOTR, but i wish somebody could have reined him in a bit.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 23, 2007 9:06:15 PM CDT

    And yes I was joking

    by mrjjonz

    X3 de-aging thing due to the fact that she must be getting on a bit in real life and looks ancient as a witch in this this with makeup and then young stil without blah blah blah blah . . .my jokes just dont seem to work. Sorry all you Pfeiffer lovers who got upset by my previous comment.Thanks for the defence Flip63Hole.To be honest, she's never really done it for me but I can see why she lights alot of peoples candles

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 23, 2007 9:07:18 PM CDT

    Much better than that underground release

    by alwaysthere

    from a few days ago.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 23, 2007 9:41:10 PM CDT

    I've already seen The Princess Bride

    by cerebralassassin

    But thanks for offering.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 23, 2007 10:24:57 PM CDT

    could do with some shading or texturizing

    by pipergates

    having seen the trailer again and again, i like it a lot but the lighting is a bit too...smooth? it needs more atmosphere/dust/grime or something.and the special effects look a bit camembert yep.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 23, 2007 10:25:25 PM CDT

    one of those trailers the seems to show the whole movie

    by santiagoatez

    Kind of like that 8 minute Kingdom of Heaven trailer that was basically a summary from start to finish.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 23, 2007 10:42:21 PM CDT

    The trailer showed the whole movie?

    by boondock devil

    As someone who's read the book I can tell you that there's a whole lot story you're not getting in this first trailer. Also for you talkbackers who are expecting LotR with this movie; this isn't Lord of the Rings. Just like how Star Wars isn't The Last Starfighter. If every genre movie stuck to the same type of genre rules and such movies would get boring awfully fast.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 23, 2007 10:59:20 PM CDT

    what on earth?

    by macgruder

    deniro, o'toole and gervais all wearing ridiculous costumes? this movie looks so bizarre.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 23, 2007 11:09:47 PM CDT

    i can not wait...

    by blackthought

    well i mean i can, since i have to...but seriously...i'm rather looking forward to this.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 23, 2007 11:19:28 PM CDT

    Read the book

    by bubba gillman

    and remember really liking it. But it's been a while and some of the details are hazy. I remember one of the bad guys being followed around by the ghosts of his brothers, but there's nothing like that in the trailer. Did I dream that?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 23, 2007 11:29:38 PM CDT

    meh...it still feels like "Merlin the CBS Special"

    by datascream

    better locations at least. I guess I'm just not getting it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 23, 2007 11:59:47 PM CDT

    book vs. movie

    by darwinwins

    the book was a very long journey for the protagonists and in the movie, everything's been truncated by a fair bit. also notice the absence of guards at the hole in the wall. the king's sons all became spirits rather than ghosts and they observed the surviving brother till the end. the captain of the sky ship also does not fight anyone in the book. so yeah, the book and movie will be quite different from one another but essentially, the same story is told. then again, the same story if told repeatedly in every other genre in various forms. boy meets girl, problem arises, odds are overcome, boy gets girl. add some aliens in there and you have any number of sci-fi movies. add some cops and robbers in there and you have a gang/crime/mob movie. add some swords and sorcerers and you have a fantasy. etc., etc.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 24, 2007 12:00:02 AM CDT

    Bubba

    by boondock devil

    Not a dream that was definately in the book and I believe that concept is also in the movie.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 24, 2007 12:55:42 AM CDT

    I TOLD YOU MCMLXXVI 'IS' MICHAEL BAY!

    by dogsoup

    In conclusion this movie looks BADASS. Book was better though.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 24, 2007 2:20:50 AM CDT

    FALLEN STAR GOTTA EAT DUST

    by acne scarface

    ".dnah tuohtiw nekorb eb llahs eh tub ;secnirp fo ecnirP eht tsniaga pu dnats osla llahs eh :ynam yortsed llahs ecaep yb dna ,traeh sih ni flesmih yfingam llahs eh dna ;dnah sih ni repsorp ot tfarc esuac llahs eh osla ycilop sih hguorht dnA" 52:8 leinaD

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 24, 2007 3:10:19 AM CDT

    would prefer they made a movie...

    by chromedome

    ..based on Neverwhere, but this will do, I suppose.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 24, 2007 5:20:38 AM CDT

    I would prefer...

    by sulis

    American Gods, but that would require a looooong movie. Jason Staham as Sparrow, Brian Cox as Wednesday, etc., etc.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 24, 2007 5:32:23 AM CDT

    Shadow, not Sparrow... Whoops.

    by sulis

  • Mar 24, 2007 5:36:43 AM CDT

    I'm not expecting LOTR....

    by judge dredds dirty undies

    I'm expecting a convincing look instead of something that looks as laughable as Stardust does.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 24, 2007 8:15:15 AM CDT

    Man - that trailer gave me a great idea.

    by edmundodupont

    Hollywood should remake Masters Of The Universe and cast Peter O'Toole as Skeletor.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 24, 2007 8:27:54 AM CDT

    I still miss Noel. (Spoiler)

    by anna valerious

    However, what is the point of keeping Septmus alive for a final battle? I mean, it's less ridiculous than saying Roran is a draft dodger, but still...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 24, 2007 8:35:54 AM CDT

    Looks fucking horrible

    by feckdrinkarse

    Will it be worse than Eragon ?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 24, 2007 9:32:03 AM CDT

    I like that the trailer script feels forced to mention

    by creasybear

    that we've already seen all of this before, basically. I just don't know if this movie will have enough comedy to make it distinct. It certainly isn't going to feel unique based on having magical words of CGI.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 24, 2007 10:17:39 AM CDT

    GEE...MORE PISSY LITTLE FANBOY BITCHING...

    by theuglybaby

    Hey, ComicGeeks?

    What say you go out and try to get laid rather than sitting at home whining like a bunch of little twats.

    Funny how you can complain and criticize other people's hard work and creativity when the only things you ever seem to be able to produce is more of your puerile moaning on these message boards.

    p.s.
    I banged your moms. All of them.

    And they were gooooooooooood.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 24, 2007 11:42:10 AM CDT

    Sigh...

    by cz

    This isn't a very good trailer. It's purposely trying to make Stardust look like an action movie and is actively trying to hide the fairy tale. I can see bits of the quirkiness I liked from the books, but if the movie's at all faithful, we're just not getting the full effect.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 24, 2007 1:38:43 PM CDT

    Jackson Dinosaur

    by bythehairofsanjaya

    By the hair of Sanjaya the worst CGI in its short history has to be the dino stampede in Cong.

    Traumnovelle the three witches did remind me a lot of Hocus Pocus (not that I am admitting I watched it however). I wonder if HP got its premise from "Stardust".

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 24, 2007 2:30:11 PM CDT

    I thought this was a comedy, not action adventure

    by drath

    Fanboy bitching about not recognizing any of the actors on account of being born the year Titanic came out, I'm surprised by how formulaic this trailer is. Everything I'd read about Stardust was that this was a comedy like the princess bride. But this trailer isn't marketing it that way. Has the deceptive campaign behind Bridge to Terabithia convinced the industry that trailers to anything fantasy-related should always follow a Potter/LOTR/Narnia formula with chanting choirs and explosions of CG magic no matter how far it strays from the movie's actual tone? Or is fantasy as anything other than an action adventure yarn just too hard a sell? I guess it's better if the trailers have no variety but the movies do rather than the other way around.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 24, 2007 6:18:09 PM CDT

    They DID make Neverwhere...

    by carmillavondoom

    it was a six-episode mini on BBC.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 24, 2007 8:58:43 PM CDT

    looks alright

    by the_shogun_gunslinger

    will make $55 mil. theatrical, tops. something about fantasy + sunlight doesnt sit well with moviegoing audiences for some reason

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 25, 2007 5:43:44 AM CDT

    The neverwhere tv series was a freakin mess

    by reelheed

    it was back in the days when the bbc just couldnt do drama without it feeling like cheap am-dram. Hang on... back in the days... anyway. it was terribly directed, cheap as chips and hammy as hell. Think stardust looks only 'OK' by this trailer (the rutube one was better in fact) except for the woeful titanic homage on the airship as it lands. puketasticly weak and pretty darn silly.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 25, 2007 7:40:12 AM CDT

    Zoidberg? Your mom swallows.

    by theuglybaby

  • Mar 25, 2007 11:00:31 AM CDT

    "Do-able" "Gay"

    by ijustlikemovies

    The fan boy talkbackers are on fire today. Regarding Starbust: this trailer might as well insert "Bombs Away" before the release date.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 25, 2007 1:14:02 PM CDT

    special

    by alliejamison

    what about making a trailer that doesn't present this film like it will be a cheap medley of all action adventure films released during the past ten years? well, i can understand that a super generic trailer may sell this film that is promising to be really special, to the stupid audience segments who fear originality. also the people who like the source material may buy their tickets no matter how boring the trailer presents the film. but even then there are those people who don't know much about stardust and may be offended by how dull this thing is put together...
    i'd have preferred a less generic trailer that gives the film the special treatment it hopefully deserves. i mean...even the average joes are not completely deaf. even they must be sick of that trailer music.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 25, 2007 1:21:43 PM CDT

    also...something else

    by alliejamison

    for me personally this film is a big lost chance, possibility for harrison ford to get a role in an interesting film. it's so sad.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 25, 2007 4:23:17 PM CDT

    Hey, TheUglyBaby:

    by playkins

    I lay "ComicGeeks" all the time, but I wouldn't spit on a pompous attention-starved prick like you.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 25, 2007 6:18:40 PM CDT

    Danes is a complete show-killer.

    by annoyyou

    And this film looks much too overwrought - the book is much more subtle and delicate. Danes looks like a moose, the guy who plays Tristan is totally nondescript, and Pfeiffer and DeNiro are chewing the scenery. If this trailer is any indication of how the movie will be, it will be highly disappointing. Feh.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 26, 2007 10:17:18 AM CDT

    i'm some kind of reverse-snob but

    by occula

    somehow it really drives me nuts when the flat american accent comes through. i'm always like 'how did that american dude end up in the funny costume with all the posh brits in this strange fantasy world?' plus, bad wig, claire danes you homewrecking whore!

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback