Cool News
Our First Test Screening Review Of Alan Ball’s New Film Proves NOTHING IS PRIVATE!!
SPOILER ALERT !!
Hey, everyone. ”Moriarty” here.
I honestly didn’t even know this one was filming, so all of this is news to me. I’m excited to see what Alan Ball does his first time at bat as a director, and I think he’s one of the rare creators in recent American television who got to wrap up a hit show on his own terms and who really nailed the ending when he got the opportunity. And I know it’s vogue to hate AMERICAN BEAUTY in hindsight, but I don’t. I think Ball’s the real deal, and I’m glad to see him taking this step.
So how’s the movie?
And more importantly, what the hell is it about?
Went to a preview screening of the new Alan Ball (American Beauty / Six Feet Under) film last night - his first feature as a director. Tentatively titled "Nothing Is Private" and scheduled for next Oscar season, based on the book "Towelhead" by Alicia Erian. I'm not one to give spoilers so I'm going to avoid major plot points and just go with overall impressions. Those who MUST know more details can go read the book.
It's essentially the story of the sexual awakening / coming of age of Jasira (Summer Bishil), a thirteen-year-old Arab-American girl living with her Lebanese father in Texas.
Set during the first Gulf War, politics and racism - while present - take a backseat to the real meat of the story: Jasira's relationship with the three men in her life: her abusive father (Peter Macdissi, a/k/a Olivier the art teacher on 6FU), her lecherous neighbor (Aaron Eckhart), and her horny boyfriend (newcomer Eugene Jones).
But to simply call them "abusive" "lecherous" and "horny" is to do disservice to them all: these are extraordinarily complex characters. As bad as they are, all have redeeming qualities. And in their own ways, all of them care very deeply for Jasira. Where one is a failure, another picks up the slack. She's caught in a devil's bargain, in a sense, bouncing between three men - each of whom give her something she needs, emotionally, but each with a heaping helping of a lot she could do without. As she navigates these waters, she begins to understand not just her own sexuality but - just as important - the power she holds over men. In a different film, she could be a femme fatale in the making. (Sequel in ten years, maybe?)
But it's a very funny film as well... as dark as her situation is, there's a lot of humor in it. It's not nearly so oppressively dreary as the plot on paper sounds. This is the fella who wrote American Beauty and 6FU after all, right?
The movie does not pull punches. It is absolutely unflinching in it's portrayals of abuse and rape, physical and emotional. Unfortunately, most of that will likely be cut in pursuit of the R-rating, and it's a great part of what gives this work it's remarkable power. The way it dances between dark comedy and just plain darkness is highwire act of consummate skill. There's one scene between Eckhart and Bishil that is SO uncomfortable, so intense, so raw, that it'll have the censors flipping their wigs - but remove even one frame and it's power is significantly diminished. While my friend and I were not chosen to be part of the official "focus group" (we weren't dressed cool enough, I guess) those of us talking outside after the film formed our own "group" (for which I am now officially reporting) - and the consensus was we hope the filmmakers have the cojones to release it with the dreaded "NC-17" (or just unrated), Blockbuster be damned. The sex is never salacious, but it's frank portrayal is bound to enrage those with knee-jerk negative responses to anything that even smells of it.
I can't help but worry that they're already planning on / resigned to toning it down... on the survey sheet they asked our impressions of various relationships in the film... Jasira and Thomas (the boyrfriend), Jasira and Melina (the nice hippie neighbor, played by Toni Collette) - but conspicuously absent was the relationship between Jasira and Vuoso (Eckhart), easily the most fascinating and complex relationship in the film.
All that said, there are SOME things that need to be cut, and other that could have perhaps used some fleshing out. In the last half hour the pace slows down dramatically, and characters begin to "see the light" one after another in rather predictable fashion. In a strange way, the third act moves too fast (in therms of character development) and too slow (in terms of overall pacing) simultaneously. The unofficial-focus-group mostly agreed that as it reached it's conclusion, it got a tad after-school-special-y. The ending isn't a cop-out or anything - in terms of the events that occur and the realizations that the various characters come to, it's all well and good. The HOW it plays out, though, is where it falters. For a film so devastatingly and refreshingly brazen to suddenly descend into touchy-feely talky-preachy was kind of a letdown. There are points where you feel like you've been detoured into a dramatic reading of "Our Bodies, Ourselves."
The only other fault our not-the-focus-group group all agreed on was the title - "Nothing Is Private" - kind of blah as far as we were all concerned. None of us thought of anything better, and the title of the source material, "Towelhead" didn't really fit well either, as the racism plotline was downplayed - and when present, occasionally seemed a bit forced to me.
But faults aside this is a film worth seeing, especially for the acting. The cast is, across the board, tremendous. If this doesn't have "Best Ensemble" locked up at the SAG Awards next year, I dunno what does. I'll tell you now to look for Macdissi to pick up an Oscar nom for Best Supporting (assuming the film ever gets a general release, and in any form that hasn't been cut to shreds) and possibly Eckhart as well. But the real story here is Summer Bishil.
It's early in the year for me to be making grand statements (something I'm not prone to doing in the first place) but this isn't just a "good" performance. Heck - I'm not sure "great" does it justice. This is like going straight from high school to the major leagues and hitting a Grand Slam in your first at-bat. It's one of those performances that is so spot-on, so subtle and complex - it reminds me of what Ebert said after seeing Charlize Theron in "Monster": forget being nominated, if she doesn't WIN Best Actress, they might as well retire the category. This isn't like the occasional nomination you see for a kid (Osment, Breslin, etc) - performances that are impressive... for a kid. Not this time, though - this is THE performance of the year, male or female, and the one to beat come Oscar 2008. There are scenes of such raw, awkward, and subtle emotion on display here they simply boggle the mind. There may be naysayers who suggest that Ball is fetishizing her and is just as bad as the male characters in the film - she's onscreen nearly the entire running time, at the center of every scene, lovingly photographed (and I might as well say it: she is astoundingly beautiful) - but with a performance this good, you want to give it as much screen time as you can.
So there you have it - if there's any justice, it's your first peek at next year's Oscar race. I can't think of a funny name for myself. They're spreading rocksalt outside my window right now, and that sounds like as clever a name as any other. So call me Rocksalt.
-
+ Expand All
-
and why is she so hot?
-
That pussy?
The movie sounds good by the way. -
and sounds good
-
This is by no means the first 2008 Oscar contender though. Zodiac better be represented come the awards.
-
Damn you Michael Bay
-
Which is a relief, as I was uncomfortable about finding someone who plays a 13-year old character so hot.
-
This sounds great but the Oscars are a farce that'll never give best actress to someone so young and unknown. Most voters don't watch most of the films so they go with the ones they see or the big name actors and real talent like this gets passed over again and again. Nomination maybe, if best supporting she'd have a shot.
But i'll be watching this 'cause i like ball, it sounds interesting and she'd damn fine -
2007 is looking promising...
-
She already has a fan website. I wonder if the same guy sent in this review? Photosynthesis! Photosynthesis!
-
Sweeping generalities and huge, empty proclaimations, without subtlety or detail... sounds like Ball himself could have written this review.
-
dear god, i hate whiny, white people. especially selfish, whiny, white people. and ball fills up all of his work with just such nails-on-a-chalkboard characters. and, sweet jesus, what was that CRAP about that bag blowing in the wind?! american beauty was a dumb movie. and, america is full of suckers who bought into that idiocracy...
-
NATE CHAMP: Ummmm.... there was plenty of detail in that review. Also do you guys realize how few plants actually occur on this website? Assuming someone's a plant means your assuming that PR people understand the internet and they don't yet. I assure you. There's like 5 or 6 plants on this site a year total. On another note, American Beauty was very good but took the suburban dysfunction theme as far as it could go. I think most of the backlash came because there were a host of imitators after that film that were complete critical failures. And they cheapened AB because of it. Also, I'm a massive six feet fan. It was the most interesting show on television.
-
So that rules out it being a Plant. Alan Ball has so far managed to sprinkle some genuine class over his projects, so I'd expect nothing less for this. Paint me intrigued.
-
or does he?
-
This comes as no shock, and I like SIX FEET UNDER. Regardless, 75% of the show from Season 3 onward when Claire went to art school (or maybe the arrival of Lily Taylor) was pure drivel. The show had as good as sunk itself until the final 4 episodes of the last series, and the grace note of the final episode. In other words, Ball is his own worst enemy. The novel is quite a good read, but I hope it escapes the fate of LITTLE CHILDREN due to overreverence to the source. By the way, Eckhart is very good casting; Collette, a bit obvious. If anyone wants to be spoiled as to the very graphic scene mentioned in the review, just say so.
-
I love Alan Ball's work. He's not perfect, but for me he usually strikes a wonderful mix of unflinching honesty and well-earned humor. He embraces subjects in his films and tv shows that most directors shy away from, giving sly commentaries on everyday life.
Plus, Ball tends to employ top-notch writers, cinematographers, and actors (especially actors), giving them parts to sink their teeth into. He tends to thrive on left-of-center projects, and "Nothing is Private" (or whatever it'll soon be called) sounds like vintage Alan Ball. I'll definitely be checking it out.
Can't wait.
Readers Talkback
User Login
Top Talkbacks
- Whitney Houston 1963 - 2012 -- 171 total posts 169 posts
- AVENGERS enemy revealed as pink boardgame pieces... You might suffer some form of elation... SPOILERS!!! -- 157 total posts 111 posts
- There's a STAR TREK video game that is going to lead into JJ's STAR TREK 2 apparently... -- 138 total posts 75 posts
- Here's The Red Band Trailer For Drafthouse Films' THE FP! -- 67 total posts 67 posts
- To Commemorate The 3D Release Of STAR WARS EPISODE I: THE PHANTOM MENACE, George Lucas Wants You To Know...Greedo Shoots First!! -- 479 total posts 62 posts
- New JUDGE DREDD post production footage pops up -- 59 total posts 59 posts
- Does ‘SNL’ Rhyme With ‘Deschanel’?? Learn Which SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE Vet Hosts After Sexy Zooey!! -- 62 total posts 59 posts
- HANNA's Saoirse Ronan to boss around seven little people -- 48 total posts 45 posts
- Friday Brings SWEEPS DAY NINE!! Gab Here About Tonight’s FRINGE!! Plus Einstein on TIM, Wiig On PORTLANDIA, MAHER, CLONE, GIFTED, GRIMM, SPARTACUS, SUPERNATURAL, GOLD RUSH And More!! -- 116 total posts 32 posts
- SPACE 2099!! -- 181 total posts 30 posts