Cool News
Anudda SUNSHINE Trailer That Pretty Much Rocks!!
Merrick here...
A new trailer for Danny Boyle's SUNSHINE is online.
This one's a tad more "traditional" (i.e. less abstract and stylized) than what we've seen before, and I'm thinking it looks pretty great. Love the FX work.
CLICK HERE FOR BRIGHT, SUNNY ACTION!!!
Or, for radiant orbs of a different kind:
-
+ Expand All
-
the obligatory "FIRST!!!"
-
OOOPS!! Error 404 - page not found.
Perhaps you should proceed to the home page or try searching.
If you feel you have reached this recording in error (bad link, something's missing), please email somebody.
All this with an AICN header -
I read somewhere that it got pushed back because it sucks.
-
Anyone seen the poster for this ..... They do the X-men 'gang walk'
Well 'ard! -
However, the movie doesn't particularly excite me. What am I missing?
-
could be worth watching
-
C'mon! I would have expected WAAAAAAAY more form Mr. Boyle.
-
Click it again. I got the error the first time I clicked it too but the second time around it worked fine.
-
Probably a studio thing.
-
good times, good times...
-
That totally just made me stiff.
-
Wait until 300 "blows up" and everyone's using that Nine Inch Nails song.
-
that being said...this is about a suicide mission right? The people deliver the payload of whatever but in order to do so will perish. If technology has advanced to the point where we can a.) jumpstart the sun and b.) get a ship close enough to it without it burning up, how is there no way to send this ship without a crew?
-
deserve to be strung up and whipped.
Seriously people, it's 2007, and you're still using the digital equivilant of Betamax. Unless you're working with a Pentium II made out of harvested parts from an undetonated scud missle that landed behind your shack in Kirkuk, you have no excuse for encoding videos in asf format. -
Die Microsoft die.
-
That is all.
-
If it is thats gonna totally BLOW. Also I hate it when the ships computer is so casual and smarmy in its replys to the crew. It just ruins the believability of it.
Also, I hate that f***king trailer music, its everywhere.. -
SPOILER? That the crew meet up with a survivor of a previous mission. And there is a big crispy dude in some of these frames. I'm excited to see this.
-
this film is now pushed back from late aug till dec 15th according to darkhorizons.com
when a studio pushes a movie back a whole 9 months doesnt that usually mean it is gonna blow donkey turds?
I mean this thing was supposedly done in late 2005 and to keep getting it pushed back just as things are starting to hit the internet ( and what ive seen so far, the 2 trailers) it looked decent. i wont go so far as to say epic in scope but i liked the directors other 2 works so...?
and when is the 28 days later sequel coming out? now thats something I cant wait for.
-
She's such a trustworthy and intelligent person.
-
Does this film want to be taken seriously, or is it just another fun summer blockbuster?
It's the most important mission in history and they send college kids in street clothes? Yea, it's just a movie, but what kind? The college kind? If it was made six years ago it would star Freddie Prinz Jr and his cooler pal Shaggie, wouldn't it? -
Danny Boyle = Diet Arronofsky
-
Yay!!
-
it was supposed to come out last fall but had to be trimmed down to a more "reasonable" length, hence the march release.
-
forget real or fake, more importantly , CAN I TOUCH THEM?????
-
from what i've seen but, who knows without the experience of seeing the whole thing?
-
Katherine's gorgeous, that's one lucky 50 year-old dude she's banging.
-
so there it is
-
Later on Mcphee massages Tyra's feet and no I'm not kidding.
-
Won't be seeing this until September, from what I read.
-
that makes me think it's somehow different. I get a really good vibe that it's NOT going to be a rehash of Armageddon/The Core. The clips look good and the science discussions are interesting. I hope they hurry and release it so I can be disappointed and go back to my regularly scheduled programs.
-
TRUST ME!!!
-
...hmmm-hmmm-hmmm-hmmmm, sunshine, OHHHHHHHHHHHHH YEAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!!!!!
-
and the boobs touching lesbian thing was cool too
-
That shit gave me a mighty bone...
-
That last comment was regarding the Sunshine trailer and not Tyler Skanks
-
And it's spectacular! Trailer doesn't do it justice.
-
The trailer just sort of sits there. Very monotone and not very exciting.
-
Before you go and see it, cut out the part of your brain that thinks. First the Sun is so large the largest amount of energy mankind could create in comparison would be like a mosquito fart to a nuke. The radiation would fry any flesh millions of miles away even behind a shield. What are they using an ion drive? Wow, some technology. Either exotic matter or large amounts of anti-matter is the only thing that'll re-ignite a star. If it can even be done regardless. Bottom line: Some movies are fantasy and have fun stretching physics but this is retarded from the start. Ouuuuu! Send humans so they can get into a bind and create drama for this movie, that would otherwise be suited for a robotic mission. We can land probes on asteroids YOU FUCKS!
-
I don't like the fact that there doesn't appear to be anyone over 35 on this all important mission. Except Michelle Yeoh and they have to work hard to make her look past her mid 30's...on the other hand, the reason you would send a crew instead of a robot is simple. Robots are okay at taking pictures and stuff, but people are good at fixing the unexpected problems that always come up.
-
I think we should watch the movie before judging. From what I understand the "bomb" here is dark matter, not nuclear. I know this threatens Star Trek tachyon technobabble, but I personally like the posibilities. And we are LUCKY when we can even land a probe on Mars. In the 21st century. Jimminy Crickets one of the last ones missed because half of the thing was using metric and the other English. No, using a crew is not only probable, but the only rational thing to do.
-
If it's dark matter, exotic or even anti-matter then the type of civilization require to fuck with that kind of technology would be a Type 1 or a Type 2. Many hundreds of years away. So robots will most definitely be able to carry out the mission. Your post contains 2 different time lines of capabilities. Dark matter and 2007 space technology. If we can harness dark matter then we can do just about anything.
-
you and John Titor have been cruising around 2050 using your old IBM 5100 have you? In 1969 we thought we'd be on our way to Saturn by now. We have computers unimagined at the time, but no, we're probably not even going to Mars for decades yet. I don't think a dark matter device in 50 years is any less reasonable than an atom bomb was in 1906. It is very difficult to tell which technologies we will be avancing in the future.
-
"If we could harness nuclear, then we could do anything!" I'm sure we said that in the 40's. Turns out fission is real good at making bombs, but not supplying our hovercars. Maybe Dark Matter is similar. Good at restarting the sun, no so much at running our digital watches. The more people argue against the premise the more I like it. Now if you want to talk implausabe, then let's talk about the preposterous movie people have been unfairly comparing this too...
-
the clown claims he had to go back to 1975 because of some computer thingy. Like that is going to be compatible to what's happening in the year he claims to be coming from. Unless he wants to resurrect Pong. Is he changing the past to his benefit? Is there a year this movie is suppose to take place?
-
They say "50 years into the future" or something like that.
-
Cliff Curtis and Michelle Yeoh in the same damn movie? I'd buy that for a dollar. Can't imagine why this got pushed back that long, though...
-
I think the film will look good, but the human element will bogg it down. We are a Type 0 civilization. We are still in our infancy and wearing diapers. This storyline belongs way into the future.
-
I don't see the relevance.
-
Two shitty B-movies don't make a right.
-
Anyone know what it was? It sounds awesome.
-
The Core was one of the worst films to come out in years with the SF label...well that and Day After Tomorrow and Armagaddon. Cheesy dialogue full of America saving the day tripe. At least this has a good director helming the ship. I haven't been this excited since Ridley Scott showed the world how it should be done in 79. Also, I believe this movie's coming out in the UK in a couple of months.... so nah!!
-
Kill Bill-Battle Without Honor or Humanity.
If you are bored by Requiem soundtrack, get Clint Mansell's The Fountain soundtrack. -
Thats the fifth crew member. An alien.
-
ie it probably stinks worse than a bum's poop-chute.
-
I could shit a better timescale than that.
Boo hoo that this movie relies on the premise that in the future some technologies will have come on in leaps and bounds, and some won't. Now even Iran has nukes, but no-one's got hoverbikes. We landed on the moon, then decided not to with that bother anymore. That's progress - unpredictable an uneven. Have fun knocking one out over your precious timescale, angry boy. :-D -
... That our sun (with a size of 1 solar unit) will not "burn out" and make the planet colder. When it burns up its hydrogen it will expand and engulf the inner planets in flames. Stars like this one dont fade, they flash, become HUGE and then get really small. I dont see how humans would need to re-ignite it because at that point we'd be dead already.
-
Why is everyone so concerned with the science behind the idea? All this talk of dark matter and solar units... What are you, a bunch of theoretical physicists? The movie isn't about a spaceship approaching the sun, it's about the people inside it. The rest of it is just a vehicle for all that "drama" stuff movies are so well known for.
-
It does remind me of Armagaydon. I think the only thing we are missing in this movie is the Aerosmith ballet(vomit). So what's next, a mineral discovery on Venus? So humans land on it and walk around in dry-ice suits so they can extract it. Wait, how bout we detect a gamma burster headed for Earth so we construct an umbrella to shield the planet and humans are instructed to wrap themselves up in aluminum foil, and their pets like Fido.
-
The Steven Spielberg SciFi flic. Written by physicist Kip Thorne.
-
Synopsis----"Fifty years from now, the sun is dying, and mankind is dying with it. Our last hope: a spaceship and a crew of eight men and women. They carry a device which will breathe new life into the star. But deep into their voyage, out of radio contact with Earth, their mission is starting to unravel. There is an accident, a fatal mistake, and a distress beacon from a spaceship that disappeared seven years earlier. Soon the crew is fighting not only for their lives, but their sanity."___________________Sounds like The Core, 2010, Deep Impact, Armageedan, Event Horizon, And Sphere. The fifth person is probably from the lost ship from before. You could probably throw in their Solaris too if the fifth person is a copy/clone/alien type.
-
is legit, this one kinda sucks
-
the openning hasn`t changed for us apparently ... :)
-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kardashev_scale
_______No one said that this scale is perfect. It's a guideline. All they are doing is categorizing higher levels of energy technology or usage. Like child, teenager, adult. To better put into perspective where a particular civilization falls on the scale. A species' technology has to match it's social growth so it can handle the technology. Otherwise that would be like giving nukes to the pilgrims. Without a doubt the scale will change as time goes on. I'm not making any claims as to when something will happen. I'm saying that playing with the technology that some of these movies write about doesn't belong in the right time frame. They are always premature. But it's a common fact that humans are very arrogant about what they can do. Like we would be able to play with a star for the next __X__ amount of years. Come on, keep it somewhat with in reason. All they have to do is make it a realistic (good guess) futuristic film. Show us a human civilization many hundreds of years from now and then add in Sunshine. -
whoever it is is a fucking moron. Why don't they just put this stuff up with Quicktime. Idiots, idiots, idiots! It's amazing how anything gets done these days.
-
It appears in the other trailer that there is a person/humanoid/creature with what looks like burned skin fighting with a crew member. It's hard to tell. So that's probably your fifth person.
-
about the science is that it makes for a better movie. Why was Jaws so compelling for so many people? Because it's a real monster. There are those who like 2001, and those who like Armeggedon. For the 2001 fans, the science matters. For the Armeggedon fans it doesn't. It's just a matter of taste. I don't think anyone expects absolute perfect science. That's why it's science FICTION. However, personally, it really helps when they at least TRY...
-
but BEFORE that happens, the sun will cool. That is what allows the sun to compress and achieve the pressures necessary to start the higher order fusion reactions which THEN cause the star to expand. Apparently, there is some sort of matter which makes its way into the Sun causing this cooling prematurely. I haven't seen the details, but so far it looks like these guys may have actually done their homework. I hope so anyway.
-
The Human Torch decides to go on yet another space mission to restore the sun... WHY DOESN'T HE JUST FLAME ON???
-
and honestly I would like to see it succeed. However, the fact that they didn't use any actual dialogue from the movie (beyond the v/o) or show an actual scene, does make me fear another "Core". (Yes, I realize this is just a teaser. But still.)
-
way better than the other trailer I saw.
-
sorry, danny boyd has directed some great films (trainspotting) and even some which were unfairly critised (the beach), but now his stuff just seems tired. for instance, the first 30 minutes of 28 days later was great, but the rest of it was dreck and sadly i have no reason to think sunshine will be any different.
-
So this movie has one of the most hands down, amazing international ensemble casts I've ever seen, that's just one reason to be excited for this, you've got the wonderful Japanese actor Hiroyuki Sanada who i've heard is "the" stand-out performance in this (although you never hear him in the trailer) and Cillian Murphy who's proven that he's as versatile and talented as actors come these days (check out Intermission or The Wind that Shakes the Barley or Breakfast On Pluto which are all interesting performances) and then Michelle Yeoh, Cliif Curtis who is always surprising me with good, small roles in obscure films, then Chris Evans who rumor has it really does a credible job here. Danny Boyle is one of the most refreshing and dependable directors working today and include with that a sizeable budget and you have one damn fucking nice looking flick, all of that wouldn't matter at all if the trailer looked like shit and thankfully in my opinion it only strengthens my belief that this is one of the seminal movies to look forward to this year, fuck the Spider-Mans and Transformers of the world I say (slight sarcasm there I want to see those as well but you get my point).....oh yes and that music will never get old and I really wish people would stop blaming Danny Boyle for putting it in there when they get all butt-hurt about the enclusion of it, HE DOESN'T EDIT OR HAVE ANY INVOLVEMENT WHATSOEVER IN THE FUCKING GODDAMN MAKING OF THE TRAILER....thanks.
....and one more thing..
I've been an avid fan of this site for sometime, they do a admirable job of delivering the scoops I guess, but this is my very first comment and I have to say i'm ashamed of most of the people on here, they claim to truly love and live movies all the while bitching and complaining incessantly about how there's no more great films anymore and Cillian Murphy's annoying and Chris Evans can't act (I say every actor deserves a chance) and the plot is convoluted and preposterous, being a film-lover myself and an aspiring screenwriter I love anything that's inspired in this age of shitty horror remakes and studio executives with no balls to sell a good movie so they play it safe and go with Norbit instead, no matter the genre or cast or director (although sometimes you really have to draw a line in the case that Paul W.S. Anderson and Ashton Kutcher joined forces for "The Butterfly Effect in space with zombie kittens) so that's my two cents, I know it won't change anything, but the impossible-to-please idiots on here really make me not want to tell stories or make films for a living and that's depressing.
Readers Talkback
User Login
Top Talkbacks
- Whitney Houston 1963 - 2012 -- 273 total posts 271 posts
- New JUDGE DREDD post production footage pops up -- 92 total posts 92 posts
- AVENGERS enemy revealed as pink boardgame pieces... You might suffer some form of elation... SPOILERS!!! -- 160 total posts 69 posts
- There's a STAR TREK video game that is going to lead into JJ's STAR TREK 2 apparently... -- 151 total posts 63 posts
- Does ‘SNL’ Rhyme With ‘Deschanel’?? Learn Which SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE Vet Hosts After Sexy Zooey!! -- 67 total posts 59 posts
- HANNA's Saoirse Ronan to boss around seven little people -- 60 total posts 57 posts
- To Commemorate The 3D Release Of STAR WARS EPISODE I: THE PHANTOM MENACE, George Lucas Wants You To Know...Greedo Shoots First!! -- 484 total posts 49 posts
- Here's The Red Band Trailer For Drafthouse Films' THE FP! -- 69 total posts 42 posts
- Friday Brings SWEEPS DAY NINE!! Gab Here About Tonight’s FRINGE!! Plus Einstein on TIM, Wiig On PORTLANDIA, MAHER, CLONE, GIFTED, GRIMM, SPARTACUS, SUPERNATURAL, GOLD RUSH And More!! -- 120 total posts 32 posts
- SPACE 2099!! -- 183 total posts 24 posts