Cool News
International DIE HARD 4.0 Poster Online!
Hey, everyone. ”Moriarty” here.
I wish Fox would just call it DIE HARD 4.0 everywhere.
I must admit... I’m looking forward to this. That international trailer last week looked good to me, and I’m in the mood for a no-shit action movie with Bruce Willis as McClane. This poster gets the look and the attitude right. I’m praying for this one to work.
Hi! Here is international DIE HARD 4.0 poster (beyond US this is an
official title).
-
+ Expand All
-
Feb 28, 2007 6:24:28 AM CST
I want to see this movie, like Harry's wife wants too..
by chileanseabass
..see him on the can every morning...will Bruce Willis get in a car crash with Nick Cage and spare us all the horror of his existance..now flush harry
-
But still think the Live Free or Four Poit O titles are lame.
-
Live Free Or Die Hard is a fucking atrocious, embarassing title. I don't know of a single person who has had anything but a 'What the FUCK?!' reaction to it. Horrendous.
-
The first movie worked because it had the Hitchcockian element of a normal guy facing extraordinary circumstances. Everything since has been just an action hero in an action movie.
-
It was no more ridiculous than Die Hard With A Vengeance, and it has a kind of overblown American arrogance to it that I like and seems to fit the Die Hard series. I am disappointed by this change. Die Hard 4, which is basically what it's called, is just too generic.
-
Live Free or...is a lousy title. Get with the Europeans on this one and change the title. Now.
-
pretty poster. i expect that there are other charactor shots or i'll be kind of let down.
Die hard 4 would have been a better title why the .0 ? -
Not a title. 4.0 is at least a title with the common sense to give us the installment number.
-
THIS is what I call a uber-cool teaserposter.
-
but...I guess it makes sense. 4.0 is fair play. The title isnt going to make this movie anyhow.
-
I'm probably the minority here, but isn't the whole "version release" numbering thing getting the least bit old now? It's not beaten to death, but it feels like it will be by the end of the decade. That would be "Century 20.10" I guess.
-
since the first one in russia was called "A Hard Nut to Crack," they've stuck with the Hard Nut titles since. I kinda like it.
-
Live Free Or Die Hard is as cheesily awesome as all the other titles have been. Think about it, Die Hard is already a cheesy title, but then with Die Harder and Die Hard With a Vengence they were getting more and more cheesy each time. Hearing that the film was gonna be called Live Free Or Die Hard was the first thing that got me a little excited about it. Now every time I hear Die Hard 4.0 I think zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
-
I think it works even better outside America. I'm not American and it sounds audacious and refreshing. To an American it probably just makes them feel slightly embarrassed about New Hampshire. "DIE HARD 4.0" is terrible; the ".0" thing has been lame since the 80s.
-
The whole hair thing,..damnit, he should've looked like the McClane we all know and love.
-
Nice colours!
-
Feb 28, 2007 8:53:12 AM CST
Hard Nut-hahaha-then Hard Nut with a Vengance? Anyway..
by kinghenryviii
.. I am actually excited for this movie. Honestly, yeah, Di Hard - the first one - was the greatest. Watched it Christmas night (it's my Christmas movie - always will be). I liked the 2nd one, what they tried to do. Tthe 3rd I thought was great - more in line with the first one - grit wise. Am I sick for wanting to see this?
-
is good you bunch of boneheads.....holy crap Die Hard is my Christmas movie too, brutha from another muth.....I used to be in love with With a Vengeance, but after seeing it the other day it wasn't as good as the 1st......4.0 title is on the bad shade of corny....The Bruce is back, and i can't wait
-
get spell check on this ish Harry...not that it would've noticed "mutha" anyways
-
Just sayin...
-
It's a cool looking poster, and I for one appreciate that this summer will bring us a man's man's action movie again. I'll be first in line at the cinema, coke in hand and tent in pants
-
and that this movie doesn't turn into your typical cookie-cutter action crap of recent years. I want old school like Eddie Shore!
-
it was based too much on coincidence. Why don't they just make Poseidon 2, where all those people happen to end up on another sinking ship?
-
cause if you suspend logic, some pretty cool shit goes down...
-
all the Die Hard movies, except for the first one, I guess, have had stupid titles. I mean, "Die Hard 2: Die Harder"?!
-
Why is it that on the die Hard talkbacks everyone but me has a cool user name? I mean, V for Viennetta? Spandau Belly? Mad bastard genius...
Not thrilled by the trailer, very unthrilled by the poster - no hair? No white vest? Dammit, is there anything vaguely Die Hard-ish about this AT ALL???!!!? -
Though "A Hard Nut to Crack: Cracked with a vengeance" would have worked nicely
-
They're obviously trying to make a Die Hard movie that they THINK fans want(mindless,contrived,cartoonish action) instead of what fans really want(action with purpose,and relatable characters).When will Hollywood actually listen to real people instead of just guessing what people want.Of course that's a rhetorical question since the obvious answer is a resounding NEVER.They want to make money but they have NO idea how much they COULD make if they just took the time to check out websites (like this one),use common(well,not in Hollywood)sense to weed out the assholes,and figure out how to make a movie that appeals to everyone WITHOUT sinking to the lowest common denominator.Fucking idiots.
-
"John McClaine" as the title! Of course in 10 years some studio exec will remake Die Hard with the lead as a lesbian chick. Bruce Willis could play the bad guy!
-
"live free or die hard: DIE HARD 4.0". That would be sort of like "DIE HARD 2: die harder".
-
Live Free or Die Hard is great, because this series has always had ridiculous titles. The original's told you everything you needed to know about the film, while most people thought the sequel was actually called "Die Harder". And "Die Hard With A Vengeance"? Aside from being uninspired, why put the title "Die Hard Forty" on your poster- especially when many will already consider it one sequel too many?
-
That'd be awesome if he was the mstermind bad guy. "Kill McClane?" "Allow"
-
I see whatcha mean, but as with a lot of action genre movies, I'll be willing to suspend my disbelief at the coincidence of it all, given that the first three were pretty good (yes, the first one being the best). If it helps, just remember that it's been almost 20 years since Nakatomi for McClane, 17 since Dulles, and 12 going on 13 since New York. Given that his line of work puts him in harm's way, it's really not too unlikely that McClane could end up knee deep in a big pile of shit again.
-
...stupid.
-
Torture, studios DID try and listen to websites like AICN, and all they got was Snakes on a Plane and Serenity, both of which bombed big time. The thing TBers don't understand is that they are a very, very, very small minority in the big picture. Studios make money off of the demographics across the board. That's why studios making movies like Transformers, etc. will change things up from the source material to reach a wider audience. Believe it or not, a shot of a dog peeing on what seems like an inanimate (sp?) object (really a badass Transformer) WILL get some laughs. It would be a waste of time and money to try pleasing everyone, especially the people here at AICN. Why not just sit back and let the movie speak for itself? Many will love it, many won't. Anyway, that poster kicks ass in my book.
-
Thats what it should be. I dig that poster. This summer will be one of the best for action/popcorn movie fans. Can't wait!
-
have to cater to every fanboy whim.Although I believe it is ENTIRELY possible to satisfy a larger number of people by reaching the fanbase first then branching out from there.The Spider-Man movies are a good example.Minus the pointless addition of the organic web-shooters and other minor changes it remained remarkably true to what made the character and mythology great in the 1st place and still became a blockbuster franchise.Also,good will to the fans breeds good word-of-mouth.Dumbing things down,while on the surface may sound like a good idea to make more money,how would your average person know "a dog pees on an inanimate object"(your example) beforehand and if they did would that and other stupidities be a selling point?You CAN appeal to fans and non-fans.It's been done before.As long as it's done well it should be successful.
-
Good point. Well said. I think it's more about the director and writers attached though and what they envision it as, not them trying to please anyone. No studio and no filmmaker will make a creative decision to please a fan base, they make those decisions based on their own vision. The best genre projects of this nature are those that have passionate directors and writers that grew up with the source material. But think back to Spider-Man and what you said about the differences they made in the story. Raimi made HUGE changes... the web slingers issue was far away from the source material, but it made sense. My point is, sometimes those creative choices (veering away from the source material) work (Spider-Man, Battlestar Galactica), and sometimes they don't. People complaining about Trasnformers and the new designs and what not just don't get it. Those changes need to be made. If filmmakers were to stick with source material like fan bases would like, the results wouldn't be that great. Okay, people complain about the human story of the upcoming Transformers movie (even though they haven't seen it, and have only read a very dated script). The human story of the source material was even worse, but since it came from the source material it's perfect then right? See my point? Changes always need to be made. I'm swaying from Die Hard I know. I guess my point is that studios can't and won't and don't worry about catering to a certain fan base. It's all about the filmmakers attached. If we get someone that understands what made the source material so popular in the first place, then we'll all be happy. If not, we're screwed. Bay and Spielberg (I know you never brought up Transformers... sorry) I'm sure they understand that hey, what made that cartoon so popular was the kickass theme of transforming robots at war with each other. They are making that movie. Anyone who says Transformers was more than that back in the 80s is ridiculous. Hopefully the creative choices/updates work. I see your point though.
-
the only only thing that ive liked so far is the one line mcclane says "nah...that'd make too much sense." that felt like old-school die hard. I want to see another DIE HARD movie....but I dont wanna see another action movie that can't get it's head past The Matrix.
-
live free, die hard sounds better
it's still gonna blow -
it is even clearer why the title LIVE FREE OR DIE HARD is unusable overseas. It would look like offensiive propaganda plastered all over the place. Oddly enough I like both titles.
-
yeah. keep it real!!
-
"Die Hard, Bigger, Longer & Uncut."
"Die Hard Forever"
"Die Hardest"
"Die Hard and fries"
"Dear Die Hard, You Rock!" -
The OR is what screws the American title up. LIVE FREE, DIE HARD is much better. Almost Spaghetti Western-ish.
-
i was a lil excited about this movie. I mean every good summer deserves a slew of cool actions movies, but seriously,arent there any new ideas out there ( I know I know if i can think of some ill let ya know) Im just saying. every yr lately we get these additions or remakes of movies that were good in there time but the sequels/prequels/remakes just ruin or taint the original source material.
unless a movie leaves it open at the end for a sequel or its relevant to the plot to make a 2nd or 3rd film they should just get some younger writers or directors in hollywood to push some new ideas to the forefront.
as for DIE HARD I kinda like the 2nd one ( the 1st one is still the best cuz it was fresh) but the 2nd one , with william sadler, and john amos in there, yeah it was pretty badass. I might have contradicted myself here, but I can admit that. im just saying no more die hards.... thats all
-
You know it makes sense, Die Hard 4.0 is just dull !
-
are they still going with the 4.0 as a reference to the whole "hackers trying to take over the world via the internet"?
i noticed someone earlier ask whats up with the 4.0 insted of just 4. -
Do we need to really hammer home the 1,2,3,4,5...? The Indy films weren't numbered and we followed them just fine. Until Indy 4. God, I hope there's a real fucking title for it. It all reminds me of cookie-cutter porn "Cum Guzzling MILFs, Volume 23" or something. Just so assembly-line sounding.
-
i stop watching cum guzzling mulfs after volume 15. they're on vol 23 now???looks like i need to catch up.
-
"Die Harder" was not an official part of the sequel's title. Check the actual film and the final posters: it's just "Die Hard 2." The "Die Harder" thing was taken out a few months prior to release, though it was still used as a tagline.
And I think some people are misunderstanding this post: the film is still called "Live Free or Die Hard" in the US. -
Such a shame. 'Live free or die hard' was a fucking CLASSIC title. 'Die Hard 4.0' is computer game'est shite
-
The joke was 3 will be 'die hardest' and 4 will be 'dead'keep it 'live free or die hard' please
-
Especially on that poster.
-
One thing I have always loved about Die Hard was that Bruce would always get the shit beaten through him then with a stoke of luck would spit out a one liner and kill the mother f*cker who was tearing into his ass. It doesn't look like we will get that kind of action in this new film so it won't feel like a Die Hard (it already does not) and will inevitably be rated PG-13.
For those of you who want to do paragraphs just place these two things with a p in the middle where you pant a paragraph. Thats this without the 7 OK! -
Yeah, but there's no basis for what you just said. How do we know that we won't get that kind of action in this new film? How do we know the rating will be PG-13?
We've seen a trailer... a teaser... and that's it. There's not enough info to say otherwise. I don't understand where this whole TBer PG-13 Die Hard came from. BUT, I DO miss the original concept of Die Hard... McClane confined somewhere against a terrorist unit (i.e. he's on his own). The first one nailed that. The second one was DH in an airport to a certain extent, albeit with some help. The third one threw EVERYTHING out the window, concept and all and gave him some partner in Sam Jackson. Terrible. But I'll still hope to enjoy having McClaine back on the bigscreen... hopefully in the R Rated fashion. Thanks for the paragraph tip. See if it works... -
I've actually kind of gotten over Bruce's (lack of) hair issue for this movie. (Don't get me wrong, I still maintain he should have at least 16 Blocks level of hair to play the character) But the movie poster looks awesome. As much as the teaser trailer doesnt fit the series, this poster most certainly does. Incredible and definately fits any college dorm room wall.
But they had BETTER not make this PG-13! How many jr. high students do they think are going to be crowding for this?? It's gonna be all of us college-aged or older going, and we want it rated R!! -
the number system spawning in the 70s and EXCESSIVELY USED in the 80s, i'm sorry but i like sequels to have their own original titles without it being in the title to remind us of. Star Wars, the Empire Strikes Back, Return of the Jedi is what i call em, not IV,V,VI, SW:episode crap, Raiders of the Lost Ark sounds so awesome, now add on: Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark, talk about genericness. how many THIN MAN comedies were released in the 30s always had the words in some clever play-on title.
-
It's always about the Director. John McTiernan is the man! Red October, Predator and Die Hard. Three of the greatest action movie's in history, along with James Cameron, if you want action, them's your boys. Who's directing 4? Exactly!
-
I may be wrong but I think so.
-
Mar 01, 2007 9:27:22 AM CST
Hard Nut II - Nut Harder! Sounds like Bukkake! hahahaha
by kinghenryviii
-
trilogy here!
-
Mother Fuckers. Not you guys - it's part of the title.
-
What do they call The Fast & The Furious?
Readers Talkback
User Login
Top Talkbacks
- AVENGERS enemy revealed as pink boardgame pieces... You might suffer some form of elation... SPOILERS!!! -- 148 total posts 137 posts
- There's a STAR TREK video game that is going to lead into JJ's STAR TREK 2 apparently... -- 127 total posts 117 posts
- To Commemorate The 3D Release Of STAR WARS EPISODE I: THE PHANTOM MENACE, George Lucas Wants You To Know...Greedo Shoots First!! -- 473 total posts 80 posts
- Here's The Red Band Trailer For Drafthouse Films' THE FP! -- 64 total posts 64 posts
- Wanna smell like the Hulk? What about Cap? Consider yourself a Thunder God or a unisex God of Mischief? -- 71 total posts 48 posts
- Whitney Houston 1963 - 2012 -- 49 total posts 47 posts
- Friday Brings SWEEPS DAY NINE!! Gab Here About Tonight’s FRINGE!! Plus Einstein on TIM, Wiig On PORTLANDIA, MAHER, CLONE, GIFTED, GRIMM, SPARTACUS, SUPERNATURAL, GOLD RUSH And More!! -- 116 total posts 43 posts
- New JUDGE DREDD post production footage pops up -- 36 total posts 36 posts
- Rest In Peace Bethesda’s Adam Adamowicz -- 92 total posts 32 posts
- SPACE 2099!! -- 177 total posts 32 posts