Logo

Cool News

Quint on Michael Apted's period abolitionist drama AMAZING GRACE from the Santa Barbara FF!!!

Published at:  Feb 03, 2007 11:21:59 PM CST

Ahoy, squirts! Quint here with my thoughts on the centerpiece film of the Santa Barbara Film Festival, Michael Apted's AMAZING GRACE, starring Ioan Gruffudd, Mr. Fantastic himself.

I really, really, really didn't like this movie. I didn't like it much at all.

The idea isn't a bad one. The flick focuses on the political maneuverings of William Wilberforce in 1800s Britain. He tirelessly tried to ban the slave trade and started as a lone voice in the parliament and ended up leading the majority in abolishing slavery in Britain. Whoops... spoiler... in case you didn't know that they still don't buy and sell black people in the UK.

Ioan Gruffudd... I'm not a fan of his Mr. Fantastic. He doesn't come across as a bad actor, but he's woefully miscast in that film. I was very open to him being good in a non-Tim Story movie, though, so I didn't go in rooting against him. He tries. He really does, but the script just isn't up to snuff. Really... I kept expecting to see Ricky Gervais and Maggie from EXTRAS pop up in the background wearing curly white wigs. It feels so stuffy and fake. There's literally a moment in the movie where Gruffudd walks towards camera and begins a reminiscence. "Remember Cambridge..."

The supporting cast is more than solid. Michael Gambon brings some great energy to the screen as Lord Charles Fox, a prominent Parliament member. Albert Finney is great in his 3 or 4 scenes as John Newton, mentor to Wilberforce and ex-slave ship captain. He's now a monk and he wrote the song Amazing Grace, his way of confessing to his sins. Toby Jones (INFAMOUS) also brings some humor and life into an otherwise stagey and dull film.

The biggest problems in the script is we are told and not shown. We hear speech after speech of how inhumane the slave ship transfer to the Americas or Britain is to the Africans, hear all about the disease and beatings and deaths. But we never see it, even when Wilberforce tricks a handful of Parliament members to seeing a slave ship we are just told how bad it smells and that is the reason why these rich, white women begin crying.

To a worse extent we skim over big plot points and just suddenly find ourselves years in the future, seeing the end of a big thread just barely begun. Wait a minute... why's that dude on this death bed? What happened? So, did they vote yet... is this something new? It's confusing and would be frustrating in a good movie, but here I just kept hanging on because I liked seeing Gambon and Finney pop up and it is Michael Apted. He deserves a full viewing, even if I felt it hard to sit through.

I liked screenwriter Stephen Knight's previous script, DIRTY PRETTY THINGS and he's scripting David Cronenberg's EASTERN PROMISES, which looks very promising, so hopefully this film is the exception, the good idea that just didn't work as a script.

Looks like it's coming out later this month from Walden Media and Samuel Goldwyn films. I wouldn't recommend going out of your way to catch it.

-Quint
quint@aintitcool.com






    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Feb 03, 2007 10:35:46 PM CST

    Sounds interesting

    by instant_karma

    The lack of depiction of the actual slaves sounds like an unwise bit of budget trimming.

    I hope this isn't first. First posters suck...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 03, 2007 10:37:13 PM CST

    Balls!

    by instant_karma

    Now I have to hate myself even more...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 03, 2007 11:27:49 PM CST

    quint! quick!

    by holodigm

    you misspelled abolitionist! before anyone sees, quick change the title and remove my post so no one can know.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 03, 2007 11:50:59 PM CST

    quint a correction

    by bloo

    John Newton was never a monk, he was a Church of England Pastor. and also, man, Usually your reviews are a lot better written, more concise this seems like you had other problems with it that you didn't want to get into so either your tired from the Sundance/SB film festivals, you're on overload, there's more to this film y ou didn't like but you don't want to go into or you're just phoning this review in. I've been following this movie for some time now and it looks and sounds interesting to me personally, a side we very rarely see and I know it addresses Wilberforce's faith pretty strongly. Is that you're problem was it porly shot, or just what...comeon go into more depth.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 04, 2007 9:46:59 AM CST

    How cute.

    by brandongk

    Another white person saves the minority movie, how lovely.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 04, 2007 11:39:23 AM CST

    I Always Loved The Story

    by captdanielroe

    Of how "Amazing Grace" was written by a slave-ship captain who had deep remorse, and then reformed. What I don't get from the trailer for this film is any sense of the terrible beauty of that story. It looks instead to be the story of some political hotshot seizing this issue the way a John Grisham hero seizes upon a case. With the really lousy contemporary rendition of the song over the beginning of the trailer, I realized the film that should exist, does not, and that this film will set back the chances of having that film. ... The Toussaint L'overture story getting made is where I'll stake my hopes. The Braveheart of slavery, basically.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 04, 2007 12:18:46 PM CST

    general comments to DanielRoe and BrandonGK

    by bloo

    Brandon...shut up, it's a true story and you're a troll...now why am I addressing you, i don't know..moving ons story and one ona slave who helped too

    Reply to Talkback

  • Feb 04, 2007 12:21:27 PM CST

    Dirty Pretty Things is fucking awesome

    by triplefive

  • Feb 05, 2007 9:51:55 AM CST

    I saw this, too

    by lang the cat

    Aside from a few inaccuracies in this film (such as Newton wrote Amazing Grace while still a slaver), a few things left out (such as Wilberforce stopped the British trade in slaves from Africa, but did not abolish slavery in England, or that his policies lead to the War of 1812 because U.S. ships where seized as suspected slavers), my feelings were that this came across as a decent A&E film. This was not a brilliant film, certainly not an exciting film. There really is not much here to enjoy, even the performance by Rufus Sewell, though very different was not terribly dynamic. Was anyone dynamic during the early Victorian period? If you must watch this, catch it on cable.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 18, 2007 6:34:22 PM CDT

    You sir, are a retard

    by hatespeech

    The movie was awesome.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Mar 18, 2007 6:35:54 PM CDT

    Plus, the film took place in the late 1700's

    by hatespeech

    unlike you're review stating it took place in the 1800's. Did you really see this film? The casting was perfect.

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback