Ain't It Cool News (
Movie News

AICN Premiere! KNOCKED UP International Poster!

We had a great time showing this one at BNAT this year, and I sincerely believe Seth Rogen is on the verge of movie stardom thanks to this new Judd Apatow picture. When I visited the set last year, one of the women from the marketing department was there showing Apatow some rough mock-ups of potential posters. This international poster was one of the favorites of everyone on set that day. The design is exactly the same as it was when she showed it that day. Interesting to see how dead-on that rough draft was.

We’ve also got the premiere of both of the domestic versions of the one-sheet today. Here’s Version A! And Here’s Version B!

Drew McWeeny, Los Angeles

Readers Talkback
comments powered by Disqus
    + Expand All
  • Jan. 30, 2007, 7:50 p.m. CST

    there's clearly an issue with this post

    by iamnicksaicnsn


  • Jan. 30, 2007, 7:51 p.m. CST

    I mean, I want to see those dang domestic posters!

    by iamnicksaicnsn

    She's a ho, fo' sho!

  • Jan. 30, 2007, 8:07 p.m. CST

    Wow, no one seems to care about this flick...

    by iamnicksaicnsn

    or maybe just the posters. Bring back UNDECLARED WITH MUSIC BY JOEY SANTIAGO!!!

  • Jan. 30, 2007, 8:18 p.m. CST

    wow, they are making it out to be the next big thing

    by hif4life

    ill watch the movie, but i wont follow aicn's hype... lately they have been on the wrong with movies

  • Jan. 30, 2007, 10:28 p.m. CST

    Can't understand...

    by RenoNevada2000

    Can't understand why the MPAA wouldn't let them use this one in the US...

  • Jan. 30, 2007, 11:09 p.m. CST

    Those squiggly things...

    by Dr Gregory House

    are fucking with my eyes. I think I see a boat...

  • Jan. 30, 2007, 11:08 p.m. CST

    My first thought when i saw this

    by slder78

    was "oh yeah that'd NEVER been see in a US theater." Fucking Puritans. Gotta ruin the fun for everybody.

  • Jan. 30, 2007, 11:09 p.m. CST

    "be seen" sorry.

    by slder78

    I want an edit funtion damnit!

  • Jan. 31, 2007, 3:39 a.m. CST

    This poster will probably be seen in UK cinemas

    by Charlie & Tex

    There's no problem with it - unless some lunatic-fringe religious groups actually think that there is something offensive in pictorially showing the most basic biological function...

  • Jan. 31, 2007, 7:25 a.m. CST

    In Britain?

    by McBane

    I can see the religious and family groups having babies (pardon the pun) over this poster. Heaven forbid that Parents actually have to explain to little johnny and suxy why all those worms want to play with that big ball.

  • Jan. 31, 2007, 12:43 p.m. CST


    by ewokstew

    it is forbidden to show spermatoza on movie posters in the U.S.

  • Jan. 31, 2007, 12:48 p.m. CST


    by Charlie & Tex

    Yeah, Britain has some "moral majority" corners of Christian religious fervour, but few people take their condemnation (of anything even slightly objectionable) very seriously. The UK may still have a "stiff upper-lip" view by outsiders, but we're pretty liberal really...

  • Jan. 31, 2007, 1:53 p.m. CST

    Coming Soon

    by Kevin Bosch


  • Jan. 31, 2007, 9:55 p.m. CST

    Look Who's Talking was rated PG-13...

    by Osmosis Jones

    ...and it had a graphic depiction of sperm invading a woman's uterus in the opening credits. So why would this poster be inappropriate for U.S. theaters?