Logo

Cool News

Quint at Sundance!!! John August's THE NINES starring Ryan Reynolds and NZ comedy EAGLE VS. SHARK!!!

Published at:  Jan 25, 2007 8:57:23 AM CST

Ahoy, squirts! Quint here with another pair of reviews, one from a radically messed up movie that I thought was going to be a flat out comedy and the other of a quirky, oddball comedy.

THE NINES

The plot description I read said the film was broken into three parts, with the same three actors being the constant in each story. It sounded like they were going to experiment with different genres and play around with preconceived notions of the actors involved, giving them each something different to do within the span of a single film.

That was what I expected when I sat down. We'd get a comedy, a drama and a thriller. Or some variation of that. I really had no idea what I was getting in to.

It's very obvious that John August (screenwriter of GO and BIG FISH) was inspired by Richard Kelly's DONNIE DARKO. What we're working with in this film is a complex narrative involving different realities. In one reality an actor goes through a nasty break-up and goes a little crazy, ultimately getting high and crashing his car. He's placed under house arrest and the only contact he has is with a perky publicist (Melissa McCarthy) and the next door neighbor lady (Hope Davis). It becomes pretty clear straight away that McCarthy and Davis are trying to influence Reynolds away from the other. But why?

And what is The Nines? Why is the number 9 popping up everywhere? Reynolds can only roll a five and a four with a pair of die. There's a note on the counter, in his own handwriting, that says "Look for the nines." But why and where does it come from? I guess this sort of thing is going to catch on... the Jim Carrey movie (NUMBER 23) deals with a recurring number. I first was exposed to that as a story point with Stephen King's brilliant DARK TOWER series. In that, the number was 19. In fact, I felt a strong tone similarity to Dark Tower in THE NINES.

August smartly wrote the script... where strange things happen and are explained in the next act or at the end of the movie. Everything is connected and makes sense by the end of it.

In the second act, Reynolds is now a writer/director making a thriller TV show, a sort of LOST/MEDIUM type show. He's being followed by a documentary crew as he makes the pilot. Melissa McCarthy plays herself, friend to Reynolds' character and chosen to star in the pilot. Hope Davis is a manipulating TV executive. Once again they're each trying to pull Reynolds one way or the other, this time Davis is trying to replace McCarthy from the show. McCarthy is chubby and she says that is affecting the test scores.

The third segment takes place within the reality of the show being created in the second segment. Reynolds is the husband, McCarthy is the wife and Elle Fanning (Dakota's little sister) are in their roles from the previous act, as wife and daughter. Davis is a hitchhiker.

I won't give away the big ending, but I will say that despite August going overly sentimental at the end, the movie really, really impressed me. It'll divide people, though. I've spoken to many who hate the movie... Rav didn't like it much at all, but I've also spoken with people that love it. I personally was really impressed with it. I wouldn't say I'm head over heels in love with it, but I think it's a damn good movie and the best Ryan Reynolds has ever been. McCarthy is radiant and fantastic. Sometimes overweight people can try too hard to compensate for their weight. I have firsthand experience with that, but McCarthy is just so natural, so comfortable with who she is and her personality is just so likable that you really fall for her.

Overall, I highly recommend the film. I can't guarantee you'll love it, but you'll have a strong feeling about it one way or another, just like DONNIE DARKO. You'll either love it and think it's brilliant or hate it. There won't be much middle ground with this one.

EAGLE VS. SHARK

I've been extremely lucky this trip. Sundance hasn't overwhelmed me. It's been busy, sure. Incredibly busy, but I never felt like I was out of my element or always on the move. A lot of that has to do with the quality of films programmed. And I've also been able to kind of ground myself twice now.

The first time was with THE UNFORSEEN. For 90 minutes I got to transport myself back to Austin, one of my two favorite cities in the world. That eased my homesickness a bit.

The second time was last night at the premiere of EAGLE VS. SHARK, where I got to spend another 90 minutes in my second favorite city in the world, Wellington, New Zealand.

The pleasant surprise with both films was that there was more to like than just a familiar setting.

EAGLE VS. SHARK is an awkward love story between a shy and weird fast food employee and an incredibly geeky and even weirder slacker. Jarrod (Jemaine Clement) throws a video game party and wants to invite the cute blonde that works at the fast food restaurant with Lily (Loren Horsley), so he gives the invitation to Lily to pass on. Of course, Lily crashes the party. Anyone attending is supposed to dress up as their favorite animal, so Lily makes herself a shark outfit. Which looks a lot like those '70s Jaws costumes, if you've ever seen them. The nose of the shark is pointed straight up and your face is is framed by the shark's open mouth and teeth.

They play a videogame, tournament style and she challenges Jarrod, dressed as an eagle. Now you know why they called it EAGLE VS. SHARK. The awkward and weird love affair begins here.

I really hate making this comparison because it's becoming the go-to reference when talking about off-kilter indie comedies, but EAGLE VS. SHARK reminded me a lot of NAPOLEON DYNAMITE. The worlds are completely different, but there's a similar tone. There's a kind of nerdy kitsch that is shared, the lead character is an annoying idiot, but somehow he's still likable.

The performances are all great, there are no lulls in the pacing and the funny is consistent. It's a really sweet movie.

Miramax picked up the film before Sundance and there's a June release planned.





-Quint
quint@aintitcool.com






    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Jan 24, 2007 8:48:39 PM CST

    First....boo, ha ha

    by the real jack bauer

  • Jan 24, 2007 8:55:18 PM CST

    and Second.....yawn

    by the real jack bauer

  • Jan 24, 2007 8:56:48 PM CST

    That title is Box Office Poison.

    by pound sand

    Should've gone with "Off Kilter Indie Rom-Com, Part Umpteen" which was their actual working title.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 24, 2007 9:01:19 PM CST

    Eagle

    by konkrete590

    Is the guy from Flight of the Conchords, I will definately see that one. Maybe I'll bring Alby the racist Dragon with me!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 24, 2007 9:14:41 PM CST

    Sounds like two bad movies

    by industrykiller!

    Maybe the leads can make Eagle vs. Shark work but this Napolean Dynamite style craze has got to be the most vapid thing to fool an idiot public since American idol. The Nines on the other hand I have no faith in given that it was written by John August, who I'm pretty sure cannot write a decent script. This one sounds typically heavy handed and purposely weird. The only reason to write a Donnie Darko/The Fountain script filled with metaphors and things that ont he surface dont make sense is that you think its the only way to get to a deeper meaning of a particular subject matter. With The Fountain it worked with Donnie Darko it kinda worked but it's arguable. John August on the other hand probably saw people making meaningful work of this style and said "I can do that!" and the twisted a subject matter to conform to the style rather than the other way around. I'm not giving August the benefit of the doubt after ruining Big Fish, bastardizing Willy WOnka, and the Charlies Angels films in general. It also seems very un-indie to be playing at Sundance. Count me out.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 24, 2007 10:02:17 PM CST

    *sniff,sniff*

    by douche baggins

    Some turds can be smelt from a great distance.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 24, 2007 10:13:43 PM CST

    The Nines

    by renonevada2000

    Is the name of the pizza joint in Ithica, NY where you can get really great Deep Dish pizza. Nice wine store across the street,

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 24, 2007 10:27:26 PM CST

    Re: That title is Box Office Poison.

    by machinaman

    I don't know about that.

    Before reading Quint's review of the film, I assumed that it was a karate film in the vein of The Five Deadly Venoms (one of my favorite 'karate' films. It's so over the top that it comes full circle to good again).

    I was surprised to find out that it was an 'awkward relationship film' (not exactly a genre in and of itself, but you know them when you see them. Harold and Maude as well as Say Anything being two of the better examples of the sub-genre)

    It is an off-kilter enough title to attract enough attention (and as Quint explained, it is a title that is actually based upon events in the film) that as an independent film could make all the difference.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 24, 2007 10:45:50 PM CST

    I think you guys...

    by hamo455

    ... are confusing your indie scene and the NZ film-making scene in general. EVS (better than AVP!) cost two million dollars (NZ) to make, or so I hear, which is probably an average budget for an NZ film with no overseas backing and not tied up with Peter Jackson. We have to do quirky or just plain dramatic for it to be worthwhile (and probably to get funding). Plus we're really not that funny on film generally, and we certainly can't do big action scenes. The budget from Michael Bay's Bad Boys 2 freeway scene would probably make a dozen NZ films. Also, Taika Waititi has been named one of Variety's ten director's to watch. Make of that what you will.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 25, 2007 4:04:45 AM CST

    Donnie Darko was poor and pretenious

    by col. tigh-fighter

    Dont do this movie any favour by comparing it to Darko. Do you mean it makes no sense, is style over substance, and its major plot point/twist is based on faulty laughable first grader science fiction. Sure, it looked pretty good and the acting was pretty good (especially by President Roslin), but it was a poor story that thought it was far cleverer than it was. PS. The Napolian Dynamite comparison for the nest movie fills me with quiet dread too!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 25, 2007 7:49:48 AM CST

    Happy belated birthday to Mr. Ernest Borgnine

    by borgnine jr

    It was yesterday!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 25, 2007 9:01:52 AM CST

    Indiana Jones and the .....

    by kinghenryviii

    This Sundance coverage is boring.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 25, 2007 10:02:28 AM CST

    I think Shark would win

    by purplemonkeydw

    As long as their in water, other wise, I have to give it to eagle.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 25, 2007 1:04:13 PM CST

    Bear Vs. Shark

    by merkin muffley

    Would have been better.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 25, 2007 2:31:48 PM CST

    It all comes down to the environment. If its a mountain

    by reelheed

    pass then Eagles everytime but, y'know, Eagles. Not so hot underwater. Underwater I think a shark might win. Maybe.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 25, 2007 4:57:49 PM CST

    Fishy, Fishy, Fishy, Fish

    by douche baggins

    You know, I have one simple request. And that is to have sharks with frickin' laser beams attached to their heads! Now evidently my cycloptic colleague informs me that that cannot be done. Ah, would you remind me what I pay you people for, honestly? Throw me a bone here! What do we have?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 25, 2007 6:31:00 PM CST

    When bad writers decide to direct

    by nezzer6364

    their own trash, it never comes out well. I'm guessing The Nines is no exception.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Jan 25, 2007 7:28:39 PM CST

    EvS director Taika Waititi

    by calico pete

    ...had a great short at Sundance '05, "Tama Tu". I'll see EvS based on that alone if nothing else.

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback