Logo

Cool News

Wanna See Captain Jack's Father?!

Published at:  Dec 21, 2006 6:24:26 AM CST

Hey, everyone. ”Moriarty” here.

The first picture I’ve seen anywhere of Keith Richards in makeup onset for PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN 3 is over at ComingSoon.net right now.

Not sure how long it’ll be there, but check it out while you can, and thanks for the heads-up, Emi:





Hi Harry and Hercules!

Onward with my endless browsing, I came across a very funny picture of none other than Keith Richards on the set of the Pirates of the Caribbean 3 Set! Here's the link to the article:

Keep it real!

Emi



    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 6:27:31 AM CST

    Just because he's supposed to be Capt. Jack's

    by creasybear

    father doesn't mean he has to dress identically.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 6:28:41 AM CST

    These films suck...

    by judge dredds dirty undies

    But I do like Keith Richards the crazy ol bastard.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 6:29:31 AM CST

    And tom boy beanpole

    by judge dredds dirty undies

    Needs to grow some tits, then I MIGHT shag her.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 6:40:05 AM CST

    Brrraaaainnnnssss

    by c4andmore

    damn, that's scary

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 6:40:44 AM CST

    Nice pic!

    by penetron

    Those CGI nerds make him look life-like.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 6:41:20 AM CST

    Disney saved some dough...

    by banallfirstposters

    with the make-up/special effects on this character.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 6:48:01 AM CST

    hmmm

    by bloo

    it looks nice...but almost too similar, must be a reason though--trusting this works out

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 6:48:43 AM CST

    No Make Up required!

    by 1gazza

    Given Richards' lifestyle, I take it the make-up artists had to make him look a little more normal than usual to fit in to the pirate look!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 6:53:06 AM CST

    Wow, a photo, and not just a description

    by derlanghaarige

  • Dec 21, 2006 7:01:55 AM CST

    Thanks for that one

    by franklin t marmoset

    I like idea of having Keef in the film, so my only hope now is that they do something interesting with him beyond the obvious stunt casting joke of 'Look! It's Keef Richards! Geddit!?'

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 7:06:37 AM CST

    Yeah that's him

    by geophyrd

    Who thought this was a good idea again?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 7:13:03 AM CST

    Undies...

    by frijole

    We're all terribly impressed with how Knightley isn't "good enough" for you. I'm sure she's heartbroken.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 7:23:59 AM CST

    is it right to...

    by seph_j

    ...include a person in a sequel to a film, solely because somebody based their previous character on them? Do you have any idea what a moral and ethical principal is? Have you?!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 7:25:30 AM CST

    Um, is it me...

    by abin sur

    Or does that bald guy look WAY too short to play Jack's father?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 7:31:16 AM CST

    His face is as messy as the script for Dead Man's Chest

    by spandau belly

    And I disagree about Kiera Knightly, she has a stunning figure, but nobody is hot enough to get me out for a third installment of this franchise. One Pirates movie was enough.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 7:36:36 AM CST

    Seph...

    by frijole

    I certainly hope you're joking. What the fuck is immoral or unethical about anything in a fictional adeventure story? A bad idea? Maybe, but immoral? What the fuck?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 7:36:36 AM CST

    Aaaarrr, matey! I be seein' an awesome film ahead!

    by doctor_sin

    Fuck you POTC naysayers. Get back to your Ocean's 13 or whatever. This looks awesome as hell.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 7:38:27 AM CST

    As a HUGE POTC fan...

    by frijole

    I have to say I'm not to keen on them having Sparrow Sr. dressed just like Sparrow Jr. I've also never been convinced that Richards can do anything but stumble, slur and play the guitar. Let's hope his part is little more than a cameo... and that the costume designers and Verbinski have a valid reason for dressing him in Johnny's hand-me-downs.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 7:48:57 AM CST

    Richards/Hoggle

    by krodnoc

    Get a photo of Keith Richards and place it beside one of Hoggle from Labrynth. The similarities are increible!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 7:57:25 AM CST

    They saved money on makeup AND stunts. . .

    by nice marmot

    . . . Richards will be performing the palm tree climbing scene himself.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 7:59:39 AM CST

    Spoiler alert?

    by fuck the napkin

    I guess some people might not want to know that Richards is in the movie yet.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 8:11:37 AM CST

    You gotta love Ol' Keith Richards!!

    by klaus herzog

    He will probably be on-screen for 10 seconds though. But he is just a lovable, alcoholic loon (unlike Mick Jagger, who just sucks).

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 8:20:57 AM CST

    HARRY POTTER AND THE DEATHLY HALLOWS!

    by todayzspecial

    title of book seven ... got it from a drunken night with JK ... :)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 8:23:50 AM CST

    Fuck The Napkin

    by dutch_drunk

    Welcome to the year 2006.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 8:25:17 AM CST

    Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows!!!!!!!!!

    by jugs

    Got it from Jk's milkman eh TodayzSpecial?

    Love the title

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 8:31:05 AM CST

    LOL *Keef* rules!

    by killakane

    Can't wait for this one, DMC was great popcorn entertainment. Pairing up Depp and Richards is inspired!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 8:38:00 AM CST

    Wow they look quite alike

    by godzillasushi

    im sure it will be very funny.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 9:13:11 AM CST

    Hmmm...

    by red ned lynch

    ...the first one was largely fun but too long. The second was barely acceptable but had the advantage of coming out during a summer where the other tentpoles (Superteens Return, X-Men The Last Outrage & King Long) were all considerably less than acceptable.The cast is largely likable (even Orlando had a couple nice moments in the second film) so here's hoping for a grand finish.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 9:14:20 AM CST

    Dutch Drunk

    by fuck the napkin

    Thanks for being so welcoming!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 9:15:30 AM CST

    Looks like Keith had some work done

    by kinghenryviii

    If Hunter S. Thompson was still alive, Jonny would want him in the too - which would be awsome since there is some of HST in his performance as Captain Jack (IMO). Picture it - HST as some old gruff pirate, talking incoherently about how he road the sea turtles first and asking E. Swan about her period ala Jack Nicholson in the Departed!
    I can't wait for the Transformers talk back to sway into this and shout how they "raped the fond memories of the ride I took when I was 7". I, for one, can't wait for this!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 9:53:31 AM CST

    He looks like Ringo in that photo

    by cherryvalance

    if Ringo were a pirate I mean.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 9:59:37 AM CST

    Wanna know the title of Harry Potter 7?

    by all your base

    http://tinyurl.com/yb6ygy

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 10:17:17 AM CST

    sounds like a dark end...

    by mattyholmes

    to the Harry Potter franchise.

    www.obsessedwithfilm.com

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 10:17:45 AM CST

    Sorry, but these are bad movies.

    by brycemonkey

    I just saw the last one so was holding off judgement. The first one while quite fun, had a plot that was all over the place. I thought if they could sort that out the second and third could be great. They went the other way and made the second one even more of a mess, with the obviously commercial ending. Congratulations to Disney, they made the biggest movie of the year, and made it a lock that everyone that paid to see it would pay to see the third one. Commiseration to everyone with a brain or who likes good movies. I'll cath the third one on cable in about 3 years.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 10:41:55 AM CST

    Will Keith fall out of a palm tree and kill himself?

    by darth_gonz

    Hopefully it'd be in the DVD bonus features.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 1:26:56 PM CST

    god i hate the studios

    by white owl

    i really fucking hate the studios

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 1:28:21 PM CST

    Fuck The Napkin

    by dutch_drunk

    Glad to have you with us, buddy!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 1:36:31 PM CST

    Did anyone save the pic?

    by giant fish

    If so, could you upload it somewheres...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 3:08:54 PM CST

    Behold...

    by boromir187

    http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c222/popcorn631/KeithRichards-PotC-III.jpg

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 3:12:14 PM CST

    Didn't work

    by kilerb

    with or without the space.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 3:15:01 PM CST

    Oops!

    by kilerb

    There's 2 spaces in that link! Remove them both... :D

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 3:42:26 PM CST

    People really think these films suck?

    by childe roland

    Really? I mean, they aren't the deepest or most meaningful pieces of art, but they're sure entertaining in an "Aaargh, Pirates!" kind of way. What were you expecting from a Disney action adventure series based on a theme park ride?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 4:43:01 PM CST

    Fuck the Napkin: 1,000 bonus points for the

    by creasybear

    reference for your handle. Well done.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 4:59:22 PM CST

    CreasyBear, exactly right...

    by danielkurland

    Just because they're related doesn't mean they have to be identical.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 6:43:43 PM CST

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v628/nakedcritic/keit

    by rupee88

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v628/nakedcritic/keithrichardpotc3.jpg

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 6:45:35 PM CST

    See the image here: http://tinyurl.com/yktqbd

    by all your base

  • ...believe it or not. Why did they contract this role out to Richards. Apparently they decided that a drugged up rock star donning skin with the consistency of stucco would serve as a brilliant cameo. Still think Captain Davy Jones will be the bread and butter of the ATWE.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 9:08:31 PM CST

    POTC movies: not exactly, say, Chocolat...

    by nc blue

    ...But certainly not bad for what they are: a bunch of fun films that you don't have to try to process too deeply if you don't want to. So the people who don't like them, well, I'd like to know how they come about that assertion. As compared to what? In terms of family adventure-type movies there is certainly worse out there (see National Treasure, etc.)

    Anyway, I agree that Keith Richards is likely going to be a carrot-on-a-stick in this movie aimed at drawing in crowds, simply because I can't see him staying coherent for two and a half hours. However, there's lots of potential for other goings-on, especially with Norrington apparently plotting with the East India Company to control the seas via Davy Jones and by assocation the Kraken (correctly pronounced "CROCK-en" as I think that dude with the wooden eyeball said). Also, I look for the voodoo woman and her mysterious heart locket to figure in somewhere. I almost hope that Keith Richards is only the halftime show in this, because there's a lot of plot they need to resolve. We'll see, kids.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 10:57:49 PM CST

    Keith Richards will be the coolest prop in this movie!!

    by onewaslame

    why would a legendary rock musician choose to prostitute himself (before God) in a di$ney movie that's gayer than musicals? <--not a rhetorical question.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 10:58:19 PM CST

    Haha, looks like an older Jack

    by darthdooku

    Haha, that's funny, he looks just like an older version of Jack.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 21, 2006 11:42:52 PM CST

    richard's tralier comes with a complete blood supply

    by pipergates

    In case he need another change.Or gets really thirsty.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 22, 2006 2:37:41 AM CST

    frijole you dick, it was a quote...

    by seph_j

    ...from a little known film called 'The Shining' by a little-known 'hack' called Stanley Kubrick. I can understand how you might have missed that one.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 22, 2006 7:54:55 AM CST

    Childe: I don't hate them but...

    by brycemonkey

    they certainly aren't very good. I guess justified mediocrity is one of my pet peeves. Especially if the film that is average is hailed as a glowing success. Obviously you are infused with Christmas cheer. I suppose I'll have some of what you are having...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 22, 2006 8:41:13 AM CST

    "Justified Mediocrity?"

    by nc blue

    Okay, brycemonkey, so perhaps you didn't like the POTC movies so much, and that's all right. No one can like every movie. But I would argue that the people behind them accomplished exactly what they set out to do: make harmless, non-controversial films that people seem to enjoy watching. Sure, they were smash successes financially, but that's because families flock in droves to see this kind of movie, especially in the summer, because of course passive audio-visual entertainment is one of the primary methods of family bonding these days. But I don't think anyone is saying that they are setting the standard for film in general, just perhaps their genre of family action/adventure films. Like I said above, there has certainly been worse to come out of this field of films; hell, even the other high-profile ride movie Haunted Mansion sucked big time. And there are a lot of high profile movies that are going to make a lot of money, but monetary success is rarely if ever an indicator of a film's worthiness of being on any sort of AFI list or standing as a benchmark of what a truly great film should be. The really deserving films tend not to be products of summer blockbuster buzz, but that doesn't mean that summer movies serve no purpose. Movies were created first and foremost to entertain; a legitimate desire to advance the art of film figures into some of them but not all. Sometimes you just have to sit back and have a fun time watching a movie, and that's what pirate movies are for. Maybe someday someone will make the perfect artistically groundbreaking "serious" pirate film, but thus far most if not all attempts at that sort of thing have failed.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 22, 2006 11:21:43 AM CST

    disappointed

    by mrbong

    why makeup? would rather Keef just appeared as Keef, really. Oh, and Fuck The Napkin - fair point in respect of Keith Richards possibly being a spoiler, but the slightly bigger spoiler that you somehow missed was perhaps that Captain Jack survives the battle at the end of POTC 2?? if he wakes up and spends 30 minutes on a train station platform, we are all fucked.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 22, 2006 11:22:13 AM CST

    Richards IS Old Jack...

    by animator-freak

    ...just a thought. I haven't read anything about the 3rd film but could it be a possibility that the reason they look so much a like, is that that Richards is playing an older version of Jack and not his father....

    I could see the last shot of the film being of Old Jack sitting on a beach drinking rum singing "Yo Ho"...

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 22, 2006 1:38:02 PM CST

    IMAGE REMOVED AT STUDIO'S REQUEST

    by blair_jedi

    heh. Like a pic of Richards dressed up for the movie would be such a big spoiler. Studio's are stupid.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 22, 2006 2:07:44 PM CST

    Depp's next role? Freddie Mercury!

    by evilbaby

    from www.brianmay.com on reports of Johnny Depp portraying Mercury;


    "But you're right about one thing ... Johnny Depp is fantastic. He would be a worthy counterpart for Freddie on screen. I don't think I can say any more right now."

    Here's a bit from article:

    "PIRATES Of the Caribbean star Johnny Depp is in line to play Freddie Mercury in a Hollywood biopic.

    The movie, planned for next year, is being developed by Robert De Niro's Tribeca Productions and will focus on Mercury's life, from his birth in Zanzibar in 1946 to his AIDS-related death in 1991, when he was just 45.

    Queen guitarist Brian May and drummer Roger Taylor will have the final say over the music in the film - which will see Depp 43, miming to Mercury's original vocal recordings.

    Mercury's long-term girlfriend, Mary Austin said: 'I can't think of anyone better to play Freddie.'"

    Ok Harry! Why isn't AICN covering this AT ALL???????????

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 22, 2006 2:27:10 PM CST

    NC Blue: You pointed out exactly what I hate about them

    by brycemonkey

    "accomplished exactly what they set out to do: make harmless, non-controversial films" why should I celebrate something so middle of the road? I want to be moved by a film experience. I re-watched Domino last night, that movie moves me. It movies me to have a headache and to hate it, but I value it more than the POTC movies. I'd rather have a reaction of "Ugh! This is horrible! You are killing me!" Than "Hmmm vanilla." Hey maybe it's me but there you go. I have very weird and harsh rules about movies, I can admit that. But The fact that 'Vannilla' is the big movie draw of the year and will almost certainly be the big movie draw NEXT year is what gets under my skin. Anyway, rant over. Enjoy the holidays.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 22, 2006 4:38:45 PM CST

    Mini Me has grown up big and strong..

    by rue the day

  • Dec 22, 2006 9:15:49 PM CST

    Hey, I wasn't exactly moved by POTC, either...

    by nc blue

    ...it was just something to do with friends when it was too damn hot to do anything else. Plus I wasn't real keen on seeing whatever gore flick was out at the time. Sure, I had fun, but I wasn't exactly thinking Oscar contender there (except in the technical divisions like makeup or whatever). My point in all this is that there is room for both artistic achievement AND low-impact entertainment at the movies. I don't think people were celebrating Dead Man's Chest in the same ways that they were celebrating Good Night and Good Luck. That's because those two films had very different goals: one was made to challenge people's minds and emotions, the other one was made purely to entertain. In fact, it's fair to say that one shouldn't expect much more from a movie based on a theme park ride, the only difference in the two iterations is that one experience is live-action, the other one audio-visual. So again, if you didn't care for the movie, then that's perfectly all right, but criticizing it as failing to meet some standard that no one expected it to even try to meet isn't really fair. It's of course tragic that the multiplex masses will never see as many truly great films as they should, but as long as there is a huge demand for low-impact popcorn cinema, why not let it be pirate movies instead of Cheaper By The Dozen 5 or the next big Michael Bay pyrotechnics hemorrage?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 23, 2006 12:03:20 AM CST

    HBO's version

    by succatash

    I'd like to see HBO's version of Pirates on the Caribbean.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Dec 26, 2006 3:28:37 PM CST

    PotC and Chinese Food

    by drkodos

    Are both excellent as first time fare when hot and fresh but don't age too well or taste nearly as good the next day. Even after a decent reheating.

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback