Cool News
TheSoutherner says the BLACK CHRISTMAS remake has one good thing going for it... the short runtime!
SPOILER ALERT !!
Ahoy, squirts! Quint here. The word on BLACK CHRISTMAS seems to be solidly shitty all down the line. This is perhaps the most positive review of the movie. It makes me sad... with the original being so good... and having such an amiguous ending. Why not set this film years later in the house where the killings from the original took place? I like the idea of remakes being sort of quasi-sequels/remakes a whole lot more than the trash I've seen lately. Enjoy the review, beware of spoilers!
I am The Southerner and am here with my thoughts on the new Black Christmas remake I caught at a recent trade screening. I posted a review a bit ago about The Good Shepherd. I was called out on a mistake, didn’t handle it very well, and went on a rant. I can’t say that I won’t make any mistakes, but I do promise to have a thicker skin. Enough about me, let’s get into it. THE FOLLOWING IS SPOILER HEAVY! (For anyone who doesn’t like my use of the words hottie, chick, or any other seemingly derogatory term for females, just remember what movie this is.)
When I saw that this was what I was going to see, I knew I wanted to write it up. There have been many negative thoughts on even the concept of redoing this particular favorite. Quint especially seemed pessimistic about this one. To Quint and the lot of you who were apprehensive- you didn’t waste any energy! Let me preface the following by letting you know that I haven’t seen the original. I was never opposed to seeing it, but there are so many other films on my list that I never got around to checking it out. I do know that after seeing this one, that there is no way it could be any worse.
If anyone wants to clarify the differences to me, that’d be great. I don’t know what was left out and added. The movie starts in the present. A sorority girl is killed while writing a Christmas card to her sister. The killer as we find out likes to put a bag over the victims head and stab them through the eye. The opening credits roll and then we are in the living room with the few sorority girls who didn’t go home for the holidays. The stereotypes that replace character for the players are quickly established. We have the alcoholic, THO-laden family hater (Crystal Lowe), the liberal conspiracy theorist (Buffy’s Trachtenberg), the ditsy self-involved THO-laden dumb chick ( Lacy Chabert regurgitating Mean Girls), the wholesome values down to earth THO laden chick (Katie Cassidy), the bizarre outsider (Kathleen Kole), the only male character who’s not a killer but a prick & the townie, (Oliver Hudson), and the overprotective den mother (Andrea Martin).
They all live in the house that once housed a serial killer named Billy Lenz. The only part of the movie that was worth a damn were the flashbacks showing the emergence of the killer inside Billy, his nutbag husband murderer mother, and his sister (or daughter!). How he came to be is disturbing but unrealistic (not that realism was should play a part, but still). The flashbacks are fun and creepy. His particular taste in Christmas cookies is rather inventive.
However, once the flashbacks end, so does the movie (critically speaking). The pacing of the entire movie takes away any tension whatsoever (think When a Stranger Calls remake) and what we are left with is a horror-less slasher flick. Adding to that, we have characters we don’t give a good damn about. I’m speculating here, but I think the studios were ready to give this a PG-13 rating. The gore seems to be added in post. A flash of a sliced apart head that seemed unlikely given the force and the weapon used, and the fact that most victims were killed with a bag over their head makes me think the producers were waiting for a sign of the times to give them their rating.
OK. The violence sucks and tension is absent. What about sex and nudity? These are sorority girls, right? There has to be some T & A, right? The only sex is in a blurry sex video and the skanky, nasty mother shot from the back fucking a dude on the stairs. Alright, so nothing in the sex category. What about shower scenes or anything that could provoke a disrobing? There is one shower scene. I sat up straight when the word ‘shower’ was mentioned, especially since it involved the hottest of the girls, the alcoholic. Then 30 seconds later, its over and all we got was the side of a boob and an ass that most definitely came from a body double! Damn! What does this piece of shit have then?!? At first, it seemed like there was going to be an interesting mystery involving the identity of Billy’s crazy sister Agnes, but it never went anywhere. It was trying to imply that she was one of the ‘sisters’, but they dropped it and went another way. Once again, the flashbacks have the only slightly decent material in this dreck. There is one damn good kill though. Billy wraps Christmas lights around a throat. He drags her in the bathroom and bludgeons her with a rolling pin for what seemed like an entire minute. He uses a cookie cutter and then…. Well see the cookie comment earlier. One last thing that deserves mentioning is the last shot of the film. There is a very good use of shadow, Christmas lights, and an impaled man. That’s it. At first I wanted to try and explain the storyline by briefly going through it linear, but as I kept writing, there just wasn’t any point. If you’ve seen a shitty horror remake, then you’ve seen the breakdown.
This whole film was rushed from beginning to end, from conception to post, that it never had a chance. I never saw the remake of Willard, so I have no reference point for the writer-director (Glen Morgan) of this, but if this is any indication, Willard will never be in my collection.
At least it was only 82 minutes. That was damn decent of them.
-The Southerner
-
+ Expand All
-
Wow. What is the world coming to?
-
for a kickass Halloween movie next year. God, I hope so.
-
the only good parts were the stuff that wasn't in the original. everything else sounds like they just stuck to what was done before. and are you saying that andrea martin gets butt-naked? i might've appreciated that in the original, but now i would imagine that's the scariest thing in the movie.
-
Like we expected any different.
-
and the occasional frenetic attack on an unsuspecting person. Also, he is a POV. Why are studios STILL fucking stupid enough to give him an actual backstory, and a life outside of the events? In the original, Billy could have been ANYbody... not necessarily the old "They all live in the house that once housed a serial killer named Billy Lenz " convenient plot point.
And why are we still getting reviews for this film? Its unanimously shit, and the film has already been released!! -
*cough*X-FILES*cough*
-
And it probably won't get a CD release either. :(
-
Pimps and ho ho hoes!
-
Check imdb or any other link anywhere. It's released December 25th. Today happens to be the 14th or 15th depending on your time zone
-
every commercial break during the airing of "The Lost Room" mini series on the Scifi channel. They succeeded in annoying the heck out of me. And what the heck happened to Lacey Chabert's career that she has to take this awful role? Wasn't she in Les Miserables on Broadway? What a shame.
-
except on that dreaded sunday
-
But Willard was awesome. I return to it quite often, and would be comfortable calling it a perfect film. There isn't a thing I'd change about it except that fucking retarded studio imposed ending. It negated the entire movie, providing further proof that studios should not make movies. They should fund them and leave directors the fuck alone. But that's just my theory.
-
On the other hand, I guess it can. James Katzenbach also wrote a good book once... ONCE!
-
Nobody is going to pay to oogle these chicks in horror flicks when they can just pick up the issue of Maxim in which the actresses themselves are all dolled up to promote the film.
-
Also, bought the extended King Kong (talk about remakes) last week even though I had read the warnings here. Started watching it last Friday and it's still not over yet. Friggin' movie never ends.
-
Just like Lord Of The Rings: Return Of The King
-
*Phone rings*; "Hello?"; "Rabbi Rubinowitz?"; "Yes."; "I have switched your matzo with leavened bread - your meal is not kosher!"; "Oy vey!"
-
Where I come from THO laden chicks are packin' Tittie Hard-Ons 24/7. Hope that helps
Readers Talkback
User Login
Top Talkbacks
- Whitney Houston 1963 - 2012 -- 325 total posts 322 posts
- New JUDGE DREDD post production footage pops up -- 106 total posts 106 posts
- HANNA's Saoirse Ronan to boss around seven little people -- 63 total posts 60 posts
- Does ‘SNL’ Rhyme With ‘Deschanel’?? Learn Which SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE Vet Hosts After Sexy Zooey!! -- 74 total posts 58 posts
- There's a STAR TREK video game that is going to lead into JJ's STAR TREK 2 apparently... -- 159 total posts 51 posts
- If the Behind the Scenes Pics of the Day drops her pen, pick it up, but don’t look at her legs or else it will be on your record. -- 47 total posts 41 posts
- AVENGERS enemy revealed as pink boardgame pieces... You might suffer some form of elation... SPOILERS!!! -- 161 total posts 34 posts
- To Commemorate The 3D Release Of STAR WARS EPISODE I: THE PHANTOM MENACE, George Lucas Wants You To Know...Greedo Shoots First!! -- 488 total posts 33 posts
- Friday Brings SWEEPS DAY NINE!! Gab Here About Tonight’s FRINGE!! Plus Einstein on TIM, Wiig On PORTLANDIA, MAHER, CLONE, GIFTED, GRIMM, SPARTACUS, SUPERNATURAL, GOLD RUSH And More!! -- 121 total posts 23 posts
- Here's The Red Band Trailer For Drafthouse Films' THE FP! -- 70 total posts 20 posts