Movie News

Lady Sheridan goes down on 300 at BNAT!!!

Published at: Dec. 13, 2006, 2:41 a.m. CST by headgeek

Hey folks, Harry here with the stunning Lady Sheridan's look at 300 from Butt-Numb-A-Thon 8. For those of you that attended BNAT - feel free to write in on your takes on the various films that struck you at BNAT. We were showing quite a few very very early screenings and it's good to go into detail on some of these films. So pick a film you most want to talk about - and send it on in to the site. And now - here's Lady Sheridan...

My review of 300 for you all... It's kick-ass. Unlike Sin City, I don't feel it is style over substance--it very much keeps the drama and serious "this is for freedom" tone of the book. You could title this "Frank Miller's Braveheart" and not be far off. In a weird way, I wasn't as blown away as I expected--NOT because I was let down by the film, but I felt like I had actually watched it before because of seeing so much behind the scenes footage and the huge promo at ComicCon. I wish I had gone in a little more blind. So if it has been off the radar for you, keep it that way! The sepia-filled camera work is just stunning and it feels organic. I never felt like I was watching something CGI or green-screened, it honestly feels like they are outside, on the ocean, in the Hot Gates. There was only one shot they simply *must* fix and that's where Xerxes has his hands on Leonidas shoulders--Santoro is shorter than Butler, so they shot it seperately and superimposed it. And you can tell, it has that hideous circa 80's blue screen effect. Snyder said they were still touching scenes up and I really hope this is one of them. I was disappointed in the score--a little too "Gladiator" and not enough NIN. It had to be hard to live up to that NIN song, but I am disappointed they chose to use the "female wailing vocalist" so much. The choral bombast (what you hear in the new trailer is the new score) is interesting, a little overpowering at times but it does work within the tone of the film. And there were some nice electric guitars during some of the most modern action scenes. But all these styles also make it a bit uneven--choir, electric guitars and Gladiator...should have picked one and stuck with it. I think everyone turns in a solid performance. I really liked Lena Headley as Gorgo, she was sexy and tough and I think will walk away as being one of the most memorable characters in the film. I think the expansion of her character was a wise one, she gets to deliver the real-life Queen Gorgo's line "Only Spartan women give birth to men" and I loved it. However, her storyline with Dominic West's corrupt senator was very clunky. You can tell this isn't in Miller's original storyline, particularly because when he reveals his "master plan," it goes against real-life Spartan history that it just comes off silly, even in a superhero-hyped Sparta. The subtle love story between Gorgo and Leonidas is really touching. Butler and Headley had great chemistry and you really feel they are husband and wife. When Butler does his final "My queen--my love" scene, I sighed. David Wenham really isn't in the first half of the film much except for his narration. He has some really great fight scenes though--it's nice to see Faramir kicking some ass! He comes in big towards the end though and you just cheer. And now, for my Gerard Butler. He is the perfect Leonidas, he's the sarcastic, determined and slightly mad hero of the book. I would follow him into battle and die at his side without question. Snyder really toned down all the "the king thinks to himself" scenes from the book so that you don't watch the whole film thinking "It's Leonidas--and a few other guys who follow him." He is the Spartan King, but he isn't front and center throughout the film which was smart. Another director might have cheesed that up. That said, I think this will prevent Butler from becoming too much of a household name. This is a movie about the 300 Spartans, not King Leonidas and the 299 Spartans. I don't see general audiences walking out and making him Russell Crowe, post Gladiator. I think it will raise his profile, particularly in the industry, but he won't be gracing the cover of People Magazine. And because I cannot disappoint--he looks really fucking hot throughout this movie and I was utterly hypnotized by the movement of his muscles. But I am afraid Grande Rojo is right and they did hear my squeal of joy throughout the theatre. I imagine Butler himself probably heard it over his morning and went "Och, keep it doon Lady Sheridan! People are watchin' a film there!"

Readers Talkback

comments powered by Disqus
    + Expand All
  • Dec. 13, 2006, 2:46 a.m. CST

    First again

    by Kristian66

    I have no life

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 2:49 a.m. CST

    300 Will Own You, Beat The Fuck Out Of You...

    by buster00

    and sell you on an auction block. "Och, keep it doon Lady Sheridan! People are watchin' a film there!" said the Loincloth Butler as he buttled his loincloth all over her. She could only straddle the cup holder beside her folding seat.

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 2:50 a.m. CST

    Nice review!

    by Doc-Holiday

    Man, I can't wait to see this movie even though I'm going to have to. Good to hear Wenham getting a moment of glory too - he's been criminally wasted in other films. SPARTA!

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 3:16 a.m. CST

    I'd be afraid to follow Gerard Butler into anywhere...

    by Ribbons

    ...it's the crazy eyes, I think. He always gives me the distinct impression that he might very well just wheel around and stab me in the gut on a whim. That said, good review Lady Sheridan. Tempered and well-written.

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 3:20 a.m. CST

    This movie is going to suck

    by kwisatzhaderach

    and flop hugely. The acting in the trailer was awful and it all just looks so fake. Pass.

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 3:34 a.m. CST

    SPARTANS... TONIGHT ... WE DINE... ON TACO BELL....

    by MaulRat

    I think I've moved past desperately wanting to see this film and I'm now into the type of self destructive "Oh god, what if this disappoints me.. I've been hurt before" phase that ruins unbelievably good things everywhere.

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 3:35 a.m. CST

    PLANT!!!!!!!

    by TheBaxter

    j/k. one of us had to say it, you know!

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 3:35 a.m. CST

    Lady Sheridan

    by MasterKenobi

    That was a good review, especially "not style over substance" part. Now can I have your telnumber please? Harry keeps telling us you stunning. I can´t help think if I should trust Harrys opinion on hot filmgeek girls. Anybody seen his now famous future wife?

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 3:39 a.m. CST

    All studios should release one of their

    by MasterKenobi

    big movies in January. At least 300. There is nothing else to watch during that boring month. Everybody would go see 300 in January. It´s almost finished, trailer is released, why wait another 3 months.

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 3:59 a.m. CST

    What I hate about events like BNAT...

    by IndustryKiller!

    is how everyone just turns into a squeling nerd. Their geekdom clouds their reference for film so much so you can't trust the reviews any further than you can throw the people writing them. I mean is Lady Sheridan 13? "I would follow him into battle and die at his side without question."??? Gimme a fuckin break. How am I supposed to take a review so clearly biased and so...well...geekily (I'm coining the term) written seriously?

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 4:07 a.m. CST

    I coined the term geekily in 1997.

    by Ribbons

    True story, I have the copyright and everything. And @ IndustryKilla!: I am also always on the lookout for Plants and whatever, but I found this review to be pretty reliable. More reliable than most post-BNAT dispatches in fact, geekily©-written though it may be. Perhaps there are extenuating circumstances for the Butler love.

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 4:08 a.m. CST

    I Liked the chorale in the new trailer...

    by KillaKane

    reminded me of Elliot Goldenthal's score for Titus (Andronicus). Call me old fashioned but I don't think a Trent Reznor style approach would serve the film particularly well, I personally think an ethno classical score is more evocative for such dramatic and stunning visuals. Having said that the Liza Gerard wailing bit is played out, there are so many other choices of timbre, looks like a case of lowest common denominator bandwagoning (i.e Gladiator temp track)

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 4:25 a.m. CST

    Check's in the mail Ribbons

    by IndustryKiller!

    those damn obscure copyrights get me every time. Also it's not that I think she is a plant, but in an event like BNAT its insanely easy for the less cynical of us to let our mind run away from us and just go apeshit for pretty much whatever is put in front of us and forgive faults. That kind of thing is more in line with what I'm saying.

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 4:34 a.m. CST

    BNAT Reviews

    by Doc-Holiday

    You know - there are two types of review - the austere, detached film critic version and the filmfan's. BNAT is populated by filmfan's - hell, Harry's the biggest filmfan of us all - that's what sets AICN apart form it's peers. It's not a style that suits everyone's - but I like that reviews like Lady Sheridan's don't just coldly dissect a film - they give you flavour of what that person loved about the movie too. Whether you get switched on or off the movie as a result I find is a more reliable barometer of whether ou're going to like the movie than a sentence that starts with something like "The protagonist of this movie, here ably portrayed by Gerard Butler, carries his pathos as Atlas once did the very globe".

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 4:36 a.m. CST

    Her hotness

    by DrSurvey

    Personally, I don't find her very attractive, but maybe that is just catering to my personal taste. Sure, she seems to have become some sort of jizz-fuelled wank fetish for those on The Zone, what with her talk of loincloths and dressing up as Lara Croft, but I suppose she brings it on herself. Could have guessed she would have got a review of 300 up on here, she has been frigging this movie since I can remember!

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 4:39 a.m. CST

    IndustryKiller

    by Chilli815

    For the love of God man, what is wrong with enjoying a film on a pure level as LS did? Anyway, she didn't kiss its ass, pointing out and listing faults she found with it.

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 4:40 a.m. CST

    EWS

    by Chilli815

    I'm reading your post, and I'm suddenly very confused as to what this has to do this the film... then I remember we're in a TB, off-topic central.

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 4:46 a.m. CST

    EWS

    by Doc-Holiday

    ...either got banned form the Zone or left in huff just before getting banned. His personal lowpoint was abusing everyone because he couldn't talk about the FIFA Football game on the thread he wanted to. So that's where his little head is at.

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 4:54 a.m. CST

    Chilli and The Doc

    by DrSurvey

    Firstly, I was merely commenting on the comments about her attractivness, and the reactions that she provokes on The Zone. It's true, some of the reactions that she gets are akin to what I said. But if I must, the movie looks ace and I can't wait to see it. As for you Mr. Doc, yes I was banned, however it wasn't because I was abusing everyone, I still don't know why I was banned as I was never given a reason - I can only assume it was because I decided to give a certian moderator a piece of my mind. Ok, maybe the Monica Gellar Nazi remark was going a bit far, but I, and most others, were over that incident when the banning took place. It wasn't over the fact that I couldn't talk about about FIFA 2006, I couldn't care less, twas more the way that particular mod went about it. Maybe I am used to more gentlmanly and polite methods but hey...what ya gonna do?

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 4:54 a.m. CST

    Chilli and The Doc

    by DrSurvey

    Firstly, I was merely commenting on the comments about her attractivness, and the reactions that she provokes on The Zone. It's true, some of the reactions that she gets are akin to what I said. But if I must, the movie looks ace and I can't wait to see it. As for you Mr. Doc, yes I was banned, however it wasn't because I was abusing everyone, I still don't know why I was banned as I was never given a reason - I can only assume it was because I decided to give a certian moderator a piece of my mind. Ok, maybe the Monica Gellar Nazi remark was going a bit far, but I, and most others, were over that incident when the banning took place. It wasn't over the fact that I couldn't talk about about FIFA 2006, I couldn't care less, twas more the way that particular mod went about it. Maybe I am used to more gentlmanly and polite methods but hey...what ya gonna do?

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 4:59 a.m. CST

    300 pwns teh suk

    by King_Knut

    300 pwns teh suk

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 5:03 a.m. CST

    EWS

    by Chilli815

    Whuh?

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 5:01 a.m. CST

    who the fuck is lady sheridan?

    by Seph_J

    eh?

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 5:02 a.m. CST

    Exactly

    by DrSurvey

    Exactly! Lady Sheridan is a lassie who is resides in The Zone.

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 5:03 a.m. CST

    Woah....

    by DrSurvey

    My Exactly comment is aimed at Chilli, who for some reason has appeared below me.

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 5:09 a.m. CST

    Time Travel

    by Chilli815

    I posted before EWS, but it travelled through time and appeared afterwards. I have broken the space-time contiuum. YATTTTTTTTTTTTTA......... On-topic, 300 sounds like Gladiator meets Troy, with the crappy parts (i.e. 90%) of Troy removed.

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 8:57 a.m. CST

    That was a good review

    by godzillasushi

    quite nice.

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 9:59 a.m. CST

    Epic soundtracks - not again!!

    by Cat_Corporation

    I'm with Lady Sheridan, I'm so incredibly sick of the wailing woman soundtracks on these films. Yeah, the Gladiator soundtrack was great but the relentless bandwagon jumping is so damn infuriating! I want to hear some more Conan (RIP Basil)-style bombast; the worst offender recently was Troy, which really was horrible - except for the instrumental bits, which were great. Come on, composers, stop being so damn lazy! Or tell the studios requesting 'something a bit like Gladiator' to feck off!

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 10:02 a.m. CST

    PS.

    by Cat_Corporation

    Enjoyed the review - still excited for this one to hit the UK!

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 10:18 a.m. CST

    Has anybody wanking over this...

    by kwisatzhaderach

    ever seen a good movie? You know, one with a great screenplay, acting, lighting, direction and music?

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 10:24 a.m. CST

    MallRat

    by kwisatzhaderach

    This movie will suck. Remember my words. It's all there to see in the trailer.

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 10:52 a.m. CST

    McNulty's in this?

    by SoupDragon

    Shame he ain't one of the Spartans.

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 10:54 a.m. CST

    EWS, you are mistaken

    by TheBaxter

    the official "jizz-fuelled wank fetish" of the Zone these days is darkjedijaina.

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 10:55 a.m. CST

    When aliens study the remains of our civilization...

    by Ribbons

    ...they'll ask, "Why does every single movie set in and around Rome/Greece/Egypt after the year 2000 feature a woman wailing in the background?"

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 11:21 a.m. CST

    EWS you were banned

    by seppukudkurosawa

    based on certain information forwarded to certain MODS, in which it came to light that you were none other than...............................................<p> </p>Dustin Diamond's pet robot</p> <p>Great work LS!!!

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 11:53 a.m. CST

    Nice work!

    by LordVoldemoo

    Great review, LS! I can't wait to see this film. The last trailer owned me. EWS, I'm tempted to unban you just so we can ban you again. Douche.

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 12:02 p.m. CST

    haha geek drool is hilarious

    by bebop_chick

    As I [Iconny] said in teh zone- great review, LS! I can't wait to see what this is all about . . . I really hope that they are adequately successful in patching up the cgi holes in time :-\ . . . and I love how the notion of awesome geek girls never ceases to be enough to give some boys brain aneurisms :-p

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 12:29 p.m. CST

    I'm looking forward to this..

    by JAGUART

    "The History Channel on Acid" intrigues me.

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 12:42 p.m. CST

    HAHA

    by DrSurvey

    Seppy, that information was between us and us alone...am sad that you decided to betray me like that... damn, my great deep dark secret is now out in the truth...still, it's better then being Don Murphy..... But hey, it's nice to know that you get LordVoldermoo is going to get his kicks out of unbanning someone just so he can ban them again...nice! Furthermore, how do you know that I don't still grace The Zone? It's not exactly hard to get access to a forum. As for the review, too much of an explosion of geek jism for me to take it seriously...we all know that no matter what LS was going to love this movie, just like Harry and Kong. But alas, because I was given T3H B4NN1NG for speaking out I guess...

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 2:51 p.m. CST

    Damn EWS

    by IMScully33

    Get over yourself already. You're proving to be a bigger attention whore than you claim I (Lady Sheridan) am. Incidentally, I've disliked alot of Butler's films--I may like the guy, but if this had been another Timeline I would have ripped it apart. My fondness for a handsome Scot doesn't allow me to pass a shit film. I do find it wonderfully ironic that you finding me unattractive invalidates my review. I certainly don't give a flying fuck if you do or don't--and I certainly am surprised anyone does. But honestly, take a break and find some porn. Release your anger.

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 3:10 p.m. CST

    EWS

    by MasterWhedon

    To be clear, you weren't banned from the Zone for disagreeing with me when I locked your thread. You were banned for a) the way you handled it, lashing out in every thread you posted in with fits of douchiness and attenion whore-itis; and b) for then failing to uphold "No Hate, Just Debate," as you chose to make personal attacks against those you were debating (on unrelated topics). We watched you go over the edge and decided you weren't worth the headache.

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 3:23 p.m. CST

    hey now

    by TheBaxter

    i'm getting the feeling this thread may need to be moved to the EFBR if it continues this way. oh, wait...

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 3:30 p.m. CST

    Ha! Hey look everyone...

    by Mr. Nice Gaius

    Zonies!<P>;-)

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 4:37 p.m. CST

    Baxter!!!

    by havocSchultz

    You Boll-Fucker...I thought I was your one and only "jizz-fuelled wank fetish" Why have you forsaken me...? And in regards to Ms. Sheridan...she's only "hot" if you're into red heads who like to dress up like Lara Croft and swallow...or something like that...that's what Kirk told me...now why the fuck doesn't the quote feature work in here...?

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 5:04 p.m. CST

    It's a reunion!

    by Ribbons

    Everybody Wang Chung tonight!

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 5:54 p.m. CST

    So who are we missing?

    by DrSurvey

    Jehovas Witnesses, who to respond to first? Maybe her grace, LS - firstly, I didn't call you attention seeking at any point, and my point with regards to your attractivness had nothing to do with what I thought of your review, and I believe that when I commented on the review I never mentioned your looks in connection with it, more your geekness for Butler, a valid statement if ever there was one. More it was a response to Harrys comment on your looks thats all. And please, forgive me for gathering an image of how you feel about Butlers and his films, but I can only go on the image that you give out over the net, one in which that you are (for lack of a better phrase) "Gay for Butler." Apologies my dear lady, after all, those who find us Scots attractive are not very widespread ;) But alas, I do not see where this attention seeking comment came from. I made a comment in the Talkback (as they are apparently used for) and someone responded to that, to which I responded and so forth. Attention seeking would be going into every talkback going "The Zone is teh suck" etc... Which, as far as I know, and please correnct me if I am wrong, I have yet to do.... hmmmm I wonder who else from the zone is going to appear, no doubt there will have been some comment about me in The Zone and the "cavalry" will come riding over the hill... infact, I would rather quite like that being the attention seeking whore that I am. Back to LS again I suppose. I do release my anger, it usually comes out in the forms of a post on a forum/message board whatever. Easiest, safest and least harmful place for it to appear. Why I would take it out on my cock by "pumping the moose" I will never know, seeing as it is really for pleasure and not for pain, porn is something I do not need!

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 6:35 p.m. CST

    Back to 300

    by Arion214

    Thanks for the review, LS. I wish this film was going to be "perfect" but I'll take "pretty damn good" too. Butler and all the cast look great in the trailers I've seen so far and I am really eager to see the completed project. I love that your review was by someone who really likes the actors & director involved and has pretty much been following this movie from its inception. I trust your insights and will follow your recommendations straight to the box office window. I'd also love to hear some of your reviews of the other movies you saw at Bnat. Oh, and I hope WB puts it in Imax. Now that would kick ass!

  • Dec. 13, 2006, 6:42 p.m. CST

    Nice review LS

    by Nachokoolaid

    Although did anyone expect you to hate Butler? It could have been revealed that he was a former pedophile that had since turned his lust to farm animals, and the second you saw his muscles, it would have been... "Loincloth...mmm (drool) Nice review. At least I know this isn't a plant.

  • Dec. 14, 2006, 1:24 a.m. CST

    this movie...

    by aaron0matic

    ...is ganna be like a cumshot of testosterone, and your ganna take it like a bitch and love it

  • Dec. 14, 2006, 2:53 a.m. CST

    My questions is...

    by The Midget_King

    why does every review on this site have to be 18 billion paragraphs long? Can't people write a review that is short and to the point these days? I appreciate the people who take time to write that detailed of a review and all but FUCK, can't you limit your fucking review to something people can read without loosing a year of their life?

  • Dec. 14, 2006, 2:44 p.m. CST

    too funny

    by 1derWoman

    with the phonetic spelling there. Cracked me right up!

Top Talkbacks