Nov. 17, 2006, 6:44 p.m. CST
Excitement, I guess...
Nov. 17, 2006, 6:48 p.m. CST
Yet, very blue.
Nov. 17, 2006, 6:48 p.m. CST
Nov. 17, 2006, 6:52 p.m. CST
by Julius Dithers
Compared to Alan Fucking Rickman, yes...yes, you are weak.
Nov. 17, 2006, 6:53 p.m. CST
Hopefully this one makes some sort of sense. Still can't believe it was 'love' that saved him as a baby. Weak!
Nov. 17, 2006, 6:59 p.m. CST
It wasn't just "love," it was the sacrificial love of his mother. Pay attention to your classical mythology...sacrificial love is powerful. To call it "weak" shows complete ignorance, especially given the intriguing way Rowling worked it into the later books.
Nov. 17, 2006, 7:05 p.m. CST
I thought it was weak...well...I thought it was something worse...but as zacdilone pointed out, Rowling has explained that a lot better in the following books. I wonder how they´re gonna pull off OotP on screen. They pulled off the last one...just barely. This one is gonna be alot tougher.
Nov. 17, 2006, 7:08 p.m. CST
by The Ref
Flames on Optimus Prime.
Nov. 17, 2006, 7:11 p.m. CST
his neck is huge!
Nov. 17, 2006, 7:21 p.m. CST
Nov. 17, 2006, 7:30 p.m. CST
roll on another potter weekend
Nov. 17, 2006, 7:35 p.m. CST
Oops! I mean...Damn you Michael Bay!
Nov. 17, 2006, 7:41 p.m. CST
by Fabulous Freak
On a website so I can discuss 10 seconds of a TRAILER for a movie geared towards KIDS. WHAT HAVE I BECOME???? ... *CLICK* ... I'm out of BULLETS!!
Nov. 17, 2006, 7:42 p.m. CST
by nolan bautista
here goes..3..2..1! check out the tits on Whormoine!!..Bukkake on Whormoine!!..Rape scenes!..a ball drainer scene (like Natalie Portmans lolita scene in "V for Vendetta"..Harry Potters tight white ass!! Rons red pubic hair !!..i want everything..ATM..DP..Blacks on Blondes..Asian Bondage..Bestiality..Necrophilia..Midget orgies..
Nov. 17, 2006, 8 p.m. CST
Nov. 17, 2006, 8:02 p.m. CST
I'd do her....
Nov. 17, 2006, 8:27 p.m. CST
by georges garvaren
but that aint saying much.
Nov. 17, 2006, 8:30 p.m. CST
by georges garvaren
and that happend more then twenty years ago. Nice work.
Nov. 17, 2006, 8:58 p.m. CST
THEN PROVE IT !! OMG AAAAAAAAAAHHHH...
Nov. 17, 2006, 9:21 p.m. CST
whats the deal with these movies anyway? grown men and women acting like children in cults, lining up to read bad writing, and to see formulaic fantasy movies, each one the same as the previous. wow! i'm so excited. another year, another harry potter movie! are all lovers of these movies lobotomized?? "must... see... new.... harry... potter... movie... must go... opening weekend...."
Nov. 17, 2006, 9:24 p.m. CST
by Evil Chicken
J.K. Rowling is a modern master – have no doubt. “Harry Potter & the Order of the Phoenix” is a grittier story than what has come before. Expect great things.
Nov. 17, 2006, 9:34 p.m. CST
alan rickman looks younger than harry.
Nov. 17, 2006, 9:48 p.m. CST
How many people, who just watched the trailer, has NOT read the book? I only ask because of some of the comments I've read about what people hope is in this film. If you've read the book, you needed ask. Unfortunately, what is NOT in this film is: Dobby, SPEW, Weasley's Wizard Wheezes and "Weasley is our King".
Nov. 17, 2006, 9:47 p.m. CST
who did you used to be? You guys crack me up!
Nov. 17, 2006, 10:03 p.m. CST
Fuck yeah Harry...Round up the posse and kick those bastards' asses.
Nov. 17, 2006, 10:05 p.m. CST
You'd think that they'd release it online at the same time as it's in theaters to prevent pirated versions, like this: http://tinyurl.com/yj2zvy... Or perhaps this was their strategy. Build buzz, be allowing badly pirated versions, screencaps, and a whole 10 seconds of trailer to be leaked online.
Nov. 17, 2006, 10:15 p.m. CST
by CTU Mole
I hope he counts to three like he did with Takagi.
Nov. 17, 2006, 10:28 p.m. CST
by nolan bautista
..what color Whormiones nipples are..is Ron circumsised..how much cum Hagrid carries in his giant nutsack..anyways,really looking forward to this..
Nov. 17, 2006, 10:40 p.m. CST
Good thing that doesn't actually happen in this movie.
Nov. 17, 2006, 10:42 p.m. CST
I was really curious what the entire trailer looked like.
Nov. 17, 2006, 10:58 p.m. CST
is going to fight some hooligans after the match. Very convincing Daniel. You should have seen the 300 trailer...
Nov. 17, 2006, 11:39 p.m. CST
The apostrophe goes on the other side of "nough," chief.
Nov. 17, 2006, 11:49 p.m. CST
by Cotton McKnight
To say this looks like every other freaking Harry Potter movie. I made the mistake of seeing the second one on my birthday, and that sucked 3 hours of it away. We only get 24 hours of birthday a year, and i wasted 3 of them on that? I have been sour on the franchise ever since. Yeah, I tried to watch the third one, but at one point I just asked myself "why am I watching this?" and turned it off.
Nov. 18, 2006, 12:18 a.m. CST
Spider Man 3 Blog
Nov. 18, 2006, 12:45 a.m. CST
According to the WB Harry Potter Website the trailer will be available online exclusively at HappyFeetMovie.com Monday.
Nov. 18, 2006, 12:54 a.m. CST
"See how I'm posting on a geek website to remind everyone how manly, cool, and mature I am because I don't like Harry Potter, even though I would never actually read a book with that many pages unless I was forced to do so?" ---- You guys are really, really pathetic. Potter's a great storyline, if you give it a chance. Nobody's impressed by your bucking the trend and deciding not to like it. Hell, we're also not impressed that you don't like iPods or SNL, either. We get it. You're a non-conformist. Go do it in a corner and shut the fuck up.
Nov. 18, 2006, 12:58 a.m. CST
Yeah I really don't like the saturated color in this movie. I'm really getting a quirky Schumacher Batman vibe from this movie. I wasn't expecting Bellatrix to look like Esmeralda meets bride of Frankenstein, or Sirius looking like Billy the Kid, or every single scene looking like it was shot inside a night club. The corny blue lightning striking as the WB logo appears is the final nail in my coffin. Really not liking where this is going. :( One thing I DO really like is the shaky camera effect which is pretty much in almost every scene. :)
Nov. 18, 2006, 1:04 a.m. CST
I haven't read any H.P. book. I read a little bit of Chamber of Secrets since it was left with me, but I don't feel interested. I still haven't seen the first H.P. movie, although I saw the last two. Not that I'm putting down the books. One of my brothers and my sister have read them, I think, and they've been entertained. When I say 'I think' I mean, I don't know if they've read all the books, but they may've.
Nov. 18, 2006, 1:14 a.m. CST
But Natalia Tena as Tonks is The Sex. I guess little boys pine for little girls no matter how old they are. Maybe I'm just a freak for liking girls who can get into bars. Tonks vs. Bellatrix. Mmmmm Mmm Good.
Nov. 18, 2006, 1:35 a.m. CST
not a good look
Nov. 18, 2006, 1:38 a.m. CST
Nov. 18, 2006, 1:37 a.m. CST
he'd be hot as shit. Gotta love that smooth pale rugby-player's build. I kind of like stupid boys too, in a fantasy kind of way. He's better get his kit off before the end of this thing. Well, at least his mouth isn't jerking all over the place like it used to (nothing suggestive was meant by that last statement). But the real news of the week, which has NOT been seen around here by men, anyway is the casting of (sigh of pure lust) Daniel Craig as Lord Asriel in His Dark Materials. He's got built pecs and ice blue eues, he's played gay guys and he is going to kill GOD! My dream boyfriend.
Nov. 18, 2006, 2:25 a.m. CST
MCMLXXVI is Michael Bay himself. When the Transformers movie comes out he'll ne able to say "I was right there with the fans damning me in every TalkBack about anything for 8 months straight! Ha, bitches!" Well played Michael Bay, but we've finally figured out your nefarious scheme!
Nov. 18, 2006, 3:31 a.m. CST
at the end of the commercial here http://youtube.com/watch?v=C_ZuZ7qZREo
Nov. 18, 2006, 5:26 a.m. CST
Yates confirmed that there would be no qudditch in the order of the Phoenix movie.
Nov. 18, 2006, 5:36 a.m. CST
They're just so amateurish. How old are the talkbackers above creaming themselves over this?
Nov. 18, 2006, 6:44 a.m. CST
You guys are probably doing that cause you are used to women complaining that you only last 10 seconds. Assuming any of you have kissed a girl before! Complain when the full teaser is out, I'm sure you will! Fucktards...
Nov. 18, 2006, 7:30 a.m. CST
by Evil Hobbit
at the happy feet website
Nov. 18, 2006, 8:18 a.m. CST
Nov. 18, 2006, 8:23 a.m. CST
Fan wank.. I just came! OMG!!!
Nov. 18, 2006, 8:25 a.m. CST
Why should I bother to pay for it after seeing that nearly 11 second clip?
Nov. 18, 2006, 8:58 a.m. CST
create a 1 hr x 10 episode per book mini-series. The movies aren't that bad but it's simply impossible to include all the storylines and capture the richness of all the characters in a 3 hr movie. Put it on the SciFi channel but ONLY if they give it to someone talented like Ron D. Moore and his crew. Or Peter Jackson, if he wants a TV project.
Nov. 18, 2006, 10:30 a.m. CST
Harry Potter has officially joined the ranks of Star Wars, Superman, the Matrix, Lord of the Rings, and everything else that you sexed up bastards are too cool to even have watched.
Nov. 18, 2006, 11:10 a.m. CST
Because only degenerates would feel thats enough time to talk a movie down.
Nov. 18, 2006, 11:12 a.m. CST
who keep commenting on doing stuff to underage girls should seek therapy. Emma Watson is 16 for god's sake...
Nov. 18, 2006, 12:11 p.m. CST
He keeps getting uglier and uglier every year, and hence more difficult to watch and take seriously on the big screen. Also, let's not forget that he is a piss-weak, unco-ordinated girl with a micropenis and the invention of a dumb-ass crackpot wannabe named JK Rowling. God, just mentioning that name gives me the shits. What an ugly, old, wrinkly british hag with a stupid, uninspired story raking in the millions 'cause dumbass kids don't have the patience and the intelligence to tackle Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Now that's a book worth reading. Hey, I won't be a hypocrite. I've seen all the movies, mainly 'cause I'm a film buff and it is my responsibility as a future film director to watch this shit, mainly because they are popular films. One has to understand the audience after all. And speaking of Rowling, gosh, isn't she a fucking ugly british hag? I bet her pussy is wrinkly and stretched and crusty and it reaks of rotting oysters. Only the feeble mind of a female can conjure up something as abysmal and disgusting as Harry Potter, master of the fairies who can't even piss straight without leaking on his trowsers. That's supposed to be inventive story telling? Hey I tell you what you dumb ass ugly bitch. Just because your title character isn't the generic world saving brave and masterful hero, doesn't mean he isn't one dimensional and uninspired. He is just as cliche and ridiculous as any character Sylvester Stallone or Arnold Schwarzenegger plays. Harry Potter has the same shitty castrated expression on his ugly pale face and always reacts and talks the same way. And this guy is a multi-millionaire. Well, after the seventh book, this guy will not be in any other memorable movie, I can assure you of that. His shitty career will be over, once the shitty books are finally over as well. As for Emma Watson, well, she can act and she is pretty damn fine too. I predict great things for her in the future. Let's not even mention the toxic red-head. He just exists for comic relief anyway...
Nov. 18, 2006, 1:19 p.m. CST
Huh. Also, you appear to have swapped names there.
Nov. 18, 2006, 1:25 p.m. CST
Seriously...It's just a movie. Don't lose sleep over it.
Nov. 18, 2006, 2:19 p.m. CST
by nolan bautista
..hmm..errr..sure..i'd do him..Ron..not so much..
Nov. 18, 2006, 4:09 p.m. CST
You know, people who are SO FUCKING COOL that they have come in and tell us all how cool and nonconformist they are for hating on somthing other people like. They have the Cool badges which makes them feel so high and mighty after each post they take a huge whiff of thier own farts because its a lovely smell to them. The thought process goes like this : "Oh noes! Another TB about that stupid baby shit! I had better let the world know how cool I am by posting hate to those who like it, fuggin morons. If they were only better like me, but no I always be better. Shit! I had better tell them all so! I know I could be using this energy on other things in my day instead of wasting it on something I hate but these stupid people MUST know how terribly cool I am! I need them to know or how will I know? I have to put myself next to lame people to understand how awesomely badass cool I am......*FAAAAART* *whiiiiff* Ahhhhh I love that smell..."
Nov. 18, 2006, 4:09 p.m. CST
Natalia Tena is the Sex.
Nov. 18, 2006, 4:37 p.m. CST
by Turd Furgeson
You can see a bootleg version of the entire trailer on youtube.. Just search for the entire movie title and you'll get it. It's bootleg but I still wasn't overwhelmed by coolness. Hopefully they tell a better story than the last movie. With all the cool source material they managed to fuck that one up pretty good..
Nov. 18, 2006, 7:22 p.m. CST
That's the funniest damn line I've read in a talkback in a loooong time. Let me save you some time and answer now: Yes, I would like fries with that.
Nov. 18, 2006, 8:52 p.m. CST
Nov. 18, 2006, 10:13 p.m. CST
as a future film director you haven't made a film yet. Therefore, when you write something equal to Rowling's work, put together as good a cast as the actual directors of these films have and actually make a film that stands up to ANY of the Harry Potter films, come back. Until then shut the fuck up you spack.
Nov. 18, 2006, 10:58 p.m. CST
refer to - http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/1224264.stm and http://www.wholepop.com/984892172 you can get some fat annoying American or Canadian to play the young boy playing with his wand, if that will make it better for you.
Nov. 19, 2006, 5:24 a.m. CST
potter, not knowles.
Nov. 19, 2006, 6:51 a.m. CST
but I'd still fuck Tonks....
Nov. 19, 2006, 7:56 a.m. CST
I am sure that you read Kant's Critique of Pure Reason when you were six years old so you are more than credible as a source of what to read as a child and what not to read as a child. oh and if I could get your email so that I can contact you directly anytime a movie/book comes out onto the market and get your approval as to whether it is inspired or uninspired, that would be great.
Nov. 19, 2006, 8:54 a.m. CST
Got a a big, uh, big stack of papers there? Got a, got a nice litte story you're working on there? Your big novel you've been working on for three years? Huh? Got a, got a compelling protagonist? Yeah? Got a obstacle for him to overcome? Huh? Got a story brewing there? Working on, working on that for quite some time? Huh? Yeah, talking about that three years ago. Been working on that the whole time? Nice little narrative? Beginning, middle, and end? Some friends become enemies, some enemies become friends? At the end your main character is richer from the experience? Yeah? Yeah? No, no, you deserve some time off.
Nov. 19, 2006, 2:03 p.m. CST
Nice try, but you're still pimping the damn thing, therefore you should be banned.
Nov. 19, 2006, 4:14 p.m. CST
SOMETHING has to have happened since then c'mon guys!
Nov. 19, 2006, 6:05 p.m. CST
Or at least, not as good as it could have been? That whole "school ball" section was unnecessary and a bit creepy, and it really broke up the rest of the film for me.
Nov. 19, 2006, 7:59 p.m. CST
Nov. 19, 2006, 9:03 p.m. CST
It just got all of the pesky plot points out of the way so that Book 7 can end it all. It was the backstory book.It's her story to fuck up if you believe she did and I'd rather her do the story she wants than just to whip some shit out to appease people who have thier own expectations such as yourself anchorite. If you'd like you could do a fan faiction on what you think SHOULD have happened but really who reads that shit?
Nov. 19, 2006, 9:42 p.m. CST
It was a great self-contained book. In the grand scheme of things, however, I'm a little disappointed in the way the series has shaped up since Voldemort's return. He's been such a non-presence in the overall narrative.
Nov. 19, 2006, 11:59 p.m. CST
and I even agree that book 6 took me by suprise. But rereading it made me understand this is invaluable information for book 7. Voldemort has been in the shadows since he came back but I never really figured him as a hands on villain. The novels are Harry's perception and I love that we don't know what's going on until he does. I'll be satisfied with Voldemort's non-presence if when his presence is REALLY there he fucks things up scarringly like killing the entire Weasley Clan or something mind-blowingly horrific. JK Rowling isn't perfect but she's got such a gripping story I'm invested until the end. And aren't we all glad she's taken a stance that this WILL be the end? To me it's refreshing to know Harry will never be Lestat.
Nov. 20, 2006, 10:04 a.m. CST
Your reply to that teenager gaylord, or whatever his name was, gave me a big laugh. Thanks for that. How true.
Nov. 20, 2006, 11:21 a.m. CST
There, I said it. Go ahead, fuck with me. Hey, I'm like everyone else, I buy the books because I have to find out what happens (which is why I give Rowling credit for plotting), but I have not been able to reread anything she's written. Her books are the most unmagical books about magic I've ever read. But I've reread Tolkeins' "The Hobbit" and Lewis' Narnia books over and over because their prose is so vivid. Man, when J.R.R. wrote about Bilbo feeling a dwarf-like "fierce and jealous love" for treasure, I was practically drooling myself. Made we want to crash-and-grab my local Tiffany's. But speaking of treasure, while I don't think much of her writing skills, I think Rowling's success is cool. A real Cinderella story. She turned coal (her writing talent) into a diamond (her incredible income). Can't fuck with that.
Nov. 20, 2006, 11:38 a.m. CST
I would say that the first chapter of the first book was sufficiently magiical and mysterious. In fact the first book may have been the best in that regard because of all the necessary exposition, which Rowling infused with whimsy and cheek. But I guess I can see what you're saying.
Nov. 20, 2006, 1:04 p.m. CST
I am a huge fan of the books, read and reread as well as listen to all of them on tape/cd. None of the movies have touched the atmosphere of the books. The first one came close, but each movie since has been a greater disappointment than the one before with Goblet a huge disappointment. I'll go see this one as will my wife and children, but expectations are low.