|
Published on Wednesday, November 8, 2006 - 6:37pm |
|
Latauro is stunned by Crowe's performance in A GOOD YEAR...
The worst performance ever by an A-list actor? Latauro reviews A GOOD YEAR
Okay, so the first five minutes are pretty promising. Freddie Highmore and Albert Finney are both really good, the dialogue is mostly good, and the scene works quite well at setting up these characters and the world they live in.
Unfortunately, it's pretty much downhill from the moment we see Russell Crowe's face. Oh, I'd love to make a joke here about how it's all because of him and his face, but I'm sorry to say it's not a joke at all. Russell Crowe systematically destroys any chance this film may have had of being good by giving the worst leading performance by an A list actor that I can remember seeing.
It give me no joy to write this. I don't have any great love for Rusty, but I don't have any great hatred for him, and despite writing for the internet, I don't get a kick out of tearing people to shreds.
I'm reminded of two quotes I'm going to completely and utterly get wrong. The first misquote is from Robert Altman, who said something along the lines of "98% of your film is casting". The second misquote is from Theodore Sturgeon, who said "98% of everything is crap". Oh, Ridley Scott, how could you not see this? How could you not see that casting Russell Crowe as a thoroughly English gentleman who enjoys the finer things in life whilst working at the very top of trades and commodities and so on, doing multi-billion dollar deals from his high rise.
Russ just can't pull it off. And it's not the accent. I mean, he can't do the accent (it's English, for Christ's sake, it's the bloody vanilla of accents!), but it's not that. There's no character here. There's one written here, a moderately interesting -- if cliched -- character, but that's destroyed by Crowe's inconsistencies. There's no through-line here, no overall person. There's the scene where he's supposed to play uppercrust English, so he does so in the most obvious way possible. Then there's the scene where he's suddenly a man of the land. Then he has a couple too many drinks and is suddenly the town souse. Normally, these would be different aspects of the same character, but Crowe plays them as if there's one way to play drunk, one way to play a man of the land, one way to play refined, and all he's doing is flipping channels.
I'd be interested to know what the film would be like if Crowe hadn't ruined it. I suspect it would have remained a boring, cliche-ridden tale of a man who must be reminded of the real things in life, and learns a lot about blah blah blah. If there's one thing LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE taught us this year, it's that having a cliched premise isn't necessarily a bad thing, but you need to know what to do with it to make it fresh. In its defense, A GOOD YEAR tries a few things, but they don't work out that well. The incest plotline is all well and good, but it feels like a screenwriter acknowledging a plotline from a book for the sake of the fans. I don't have access to the net as I write this, so I have no idea whether it's based on a book or not, but I'm positive it was, based purely on this story element.
Cultural stereotypes are a staple of the film. The fat French grump who cares only for his grapes and his little dog. The French waiters with no manners. The boorish couple from the US that wants ranch dressing on everything and demands that people speak American to them. All the proper English elites who stutter when talking to women and act in every conversation as if their pinky finger is up in the air. French waiters may be rude and American tourists may be wankers, but if you have to show it to us for the fiftieth time, you need to find a fresh angle. This feels like you've loaded up the Stereotype Template in Final Draft and haven't bothered to change a word.
Once we finally reached the ending (which, by the way, has the most random and non-sequitorial tag before the end credits begin, leaving my mouth on the floor from the incredulity of its existence), I found myself pondering the title. It was half right: it did feel like I was in there for a frigging year.
Peace out,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reader Talkback
This movie honestly doesn't
look very good to me.. by Bean_ | Nov 8th, 2006 05:40:02 PM | I agree. by MMacKK | Nov 8th, 2006 05:42:39 PM | Seems like two great people by georges garvaren | Nov 8th, 2006 05:44:48 PM | Wow this sounds awful. by SkeletonParty | Nov 8th, 2006 05:44:53 PM | I SO don't care about this
movie, Crowe or no Crowe. by The Wrong Guy | Nov 8th, 2006 05:46:30 PM | You know, I'm one of the few
people I know... by Childe Roland | Nov 8th, 2006 05:47:44 PM | And What's the Spoiler? by MMacKK | Nov 8th, 2006 05:48:00 PM | Looks like a borefest, but
I'll see it for Ridley... by MaxHunter73 | Nov 8th, 2006 05:48:36 PM | Weird... by kwisatzhaderach | Nov 8th, 2006 06:15:18 PM | "How can you not see that..." by Latauro | Nov 8th, 2006 06:16:13 PM | Spot on Childe by jasper Stillwell | Nov 8th, 2006 06:17:39 PM | Given the trailer I have
complete faith in this review by IndustryKiller! | Nov 8th, 2006 06:22:43 PM | Crowe laying low by Mr.Nelson | Nov 8th, 2006 06:25:35 PM | And all tourists are wankers. by IndustryKiller! | Nov 8th, 2006 06:27:43 PM | Ridley Scott is the best of
the last 30+ years by Mattapooh | Nov 8th, 2006 06:29:36 PM | Do Not Care about this Premise
At All by monorail77 | Nov 8th, 2006 06:31:14 PM | Once again no-one knows about
his non-American work by half vader | Nov 8th, 2006 06:35:49 PM | Romper Stomper by monorail77 | Nov 8th, 2006 06:51:31 PM | It's ok by Babyshamble | Nov 8th, 2006 07:21:24 PM | It really aggravases me when
peepull don't speeks by YackBacker | Nov 8th, 2006 07:44:08 PM | How can you not see that... by Leedrick | Nov 8th, 2006 08:31:46 PM | matchstick men by ephor | Nov 8th, 2006 09:18:16 PM | What's the non-sequitoral tag? by shizzal gofux | Nov 8th, 2006 09:41:39 PM | "Yuppie scum who finds his
soul with...... by Jimmy Jazz | Nov 8th, 2006 10:30:16 PM | the English accent is vanilla
flavoured? by Amy Chasing | Nov 8th, 2006 10:58:42 PM | Ridley Scott is the best what
in the past 30+ years? by Flip63Hole | Nov 8th, 2006 11:05:17 PM | Why is this a surprise? by AnnoyYou | Nov 9th, 2006 12:27:24 AM | Incest is best by godoffireinhell | Nov 9th, 2006 12:48:57 AM | This vindicates my choice... by Wonder Man | Nov 9th, 2006 01:27:21 AM | Yes, but how was Marion
Collitard? by Touch of Evil | Nov 9th, 2006 01:59:46 AM | Ephor, did you see the
director's extended cut of
KOH? by half vader | Nov 9th, 2006 02:16:21 AM | Russell Crowe can do
English... by Sulis | Nov 9th, 2006 05:03:26 AM | I remember almost going to see
him in The Blues Bros by half vader | Nov 9th, 2006 06:08:09 AM | Wonder Man by Leedrick | Nov 9th, 2006 07:28:05 AM | Touch of Evil by filmcoyote | Nov 9th, 2006 07:54:54 AM | Fair enough, half vader. by Childe Roland | Nov 9th, 2006 08:29:33 AM | Under a Tuscan Sun 2: The
Tuscanning by Spandau Belly | Nov 9th, 2006 08:48:33 AM | Bring on American Gangster... by dr_buggerlugs | Nov 9th, 2006 08:51:29 AM | Half Vader by Kristian66 | Nov 9th, 2006 08:54:25 AM | True Childe, and Kristian, by half vader | Nov 9th, 2006 09:55:17 AM | Theodore Sturgeon... by 9000rpm | Nov 9th, 2006 09:58:48 AM | Two Rich Fat Overpaid Guys
Make a Movie About... by heywood jablomie | Nov 9th, 2006 08:56:38 PM | Two Rich Fat Overpaid Guys
Make a Movie About... by heywood jablomie | Nov 9th, 2006 08:56:44 PM | Two Rich Fat Overpaid Guys
Make a Movie About... by heywood jablomie | Nov 9th, 2006 08:57:07 PM |
|
|