… If you love TV shows based on stupid gimmicks, then Six Degrees is the show for you. …USA Today gives it two (out of four) stars and says:
… the writers don't know the difference between coincidence and fate, and they don't know nearly enough about the requirements of commercial entertainment. … crosses from interesting if absurd to completely insane. … Six Degrees certainly clips along, but moving quickly between insipid links and boring characters doesn't make them any less insipid or boring. Once you figure out that everyone is going to end up connected to everyone else, the show is out of ideas and out of surprises. …The New York Times says:
… the particular stories are not what “Six Degrees” is ultimately about. Instead the show’s forte, for viewers like me who don’t mind piety on television, is its ambience of faith, particularly in the ebullient, Whitmanian idea of “contact” in the city, by which he meant everything from a stranger’s glance to her kiss (and more). “Six Degrees” is, yes, a defunct title; John Guare already wrung out its significance in his great play “Six Degrees of Separation.” Though stuck with the title, Mr. Abrams is still expected to have fun with this show. …The Washington Post says:
… what an old idea that six degrees of separation is, and "Six Degrees" does very little to spruce it up and pass it off as fresh.The San Francisco Chronicle says:
… this series is no "Lost." It's not compelling at all. The larger mystery that's allegedly going to unfold over 22 episodes -- or five years -- doesn't get enough traction in the first hour to make you want to come back for the second. That's a problem. …Newsday says:
… This - of course - is a totally bogus premise (for a life philosophy and arguably for a show, too) and one is moved to ask the producers: Have you even been on a subway lately? In fairness, "Six Degrees" isn't asking anyone to believe this bunk but only accept it over the course of an hour. Do that and you'll be treated to a reasonably competent soap. But soap it is.The Los Angeles Daily News says:
… most of the show is metaphysical horse manure. …The New York Daily News gives it one and a half stars and says:
… It's meant to explore the degrees of separation that connect people - but after watching one episode, I was ready to make the separation permanent. …Variety says:
… Pilot is cleverly written giving the characters a heady, just-specific-enough mix of mystery, intrigue and charm - the key in each of producer J.J. Abrams' hits. … If there is one thing crystal-clear about this ensemble after an hour with the half-dozen leads, it is how each one makes life decisions. These aren't characters to fall in love with or even admire all that much, and the actors bring a proper amount of restraint to their characterizations. …The Hollywood Reporter says:
… owes more to the storytelling tradition of Aaron Spelling than to the societal observations of Paul Haggis. … The pilot starts with a tedious and too-cute voice-over by Jay Hernandez, who plays public defender Carlos, one of six strangers whose lives become intertwined by the time the final credits roll. But get through the monologue about how you never know whether this stranger will turn out to be an important figure in your life, yada yada, and you are rewarded with several highly entertaining, if not always plausible, stories filled with appealing characters. … if the stories aren't entirely convincing, the actors are. …10 p.m. Thursday. ABC.
Sept. 21, 2006, 9:06 a.m. CST
by JeanLuc Dickhard
Sept. 21, 2006, 9:07 a.m. CST
by Read and Shut Up
...I know a good, strong nap's coming.
Sept. 21, 2006, 10:08 a.m. CST
by Osmosis Jones
Sept. 21, 2006, 10:56 a.m. CST
It will do well tonight in the ratings, then die over the next few weeks.
Sept. 21, 2006, 11:37 a.m. CST
by Bob C. Cock
or it's just a big lump of shit
Sept. 21, 2006, 12:24 p.m. CST
Get back to "Lost" and "Trek," you goober.
Sept. 21, 2006, 1:43 p.m. CST
Just letting you know.
Sept. 21, 2006, 2:10 p.m. CST
What does that have to do with her hotness? Regardless, this show looks awful. So does The NINE.
Sept. 21, 2006, 2:27 p.m. CST
given the shitty boring premise, especially since I don't find any of the actors in the least bit compelling or attractive. Pass.
Sept. 21, 2006, 5:04 p.m. CST
by Big Bad Clone
I love me some Hope Davis. I kept hoping that About Schmidt would be less about Schmidt and more about his daughter taking a shower.
Sept. 21, 2006, 10:34 p.m. CST
Made it to the 23 minute mark before I lost interest. Definitely no Lost or Alias, JJ.
Sept. 21, 2006, 11:23 p.m. CST
i'd like to help her out with those "body thetans"... if you know what i mean
Sept. 22, 2006, 3:49 a.m. CST
Sorry, but I don't see the attraction to that charmless, pudgy, fatheaded no-talent. The girl has all the charisma and sex appeal of roadkill, and the fact that she's a member of Hollywood's most laughable cult only cements her fugliness. No thank you. Hope Davis, on the other hand...grrrowlll!
Sept. 22, 2006, 9:43 a.m. CST
This show has potential I hope they give it a shot
Sept. 22, 2006, 11:49 a.m. CST
as I saw Erika Christensen, I started to feel nausous, that girl makes me sick and so angry anytime i see her deformed face, maybe if they stop trying to put her in sexy roles and maybe something akin to Eric Stoltz's character in Mask then she'd be an actress. I hate her and Julia Stiles both have deformed heads, as if thier mothers tried to smoosh thier faces into the bath after giving birth.
Sept. 23, 2006, 3:30 a.m. CST
I can't believe that any show with this cast can be that bad. Campbell Scott was awesome in Roger Dodger, and thats enough for me
Sept. 23, 2006, 8:33 p.m. CST
I can't imagine any of those tv reviewers ever needing toilet paper again, considering how much they wiped their asses with that screener.