Logo

Cool News

Does Herc Jones For CBS’ SMITH??

Published at:  Sep 19, 2006 2:47:42 AM CDT

SPOILER ALERT !!

I am – Hercules!!

It’s a crime drama, from writer-producer John Wells (“ER,” “Third Watch”), that looks at a gang of sophisticated thieves from the bad guys’ point of view. It stars Ray Liotta (“Goodfellas”), Virginia Madsen (“Sideways”), Jonny Lee Miller ("Trainspotting"), Amy Smart ("Crank") Simon Baker ("The Guardian"), Franky G ("Saw II") and Shohreh “Behroooooooooz!” Aghdashloo.

There’s a cool scene with Simon Baker fucking with a pair of Hawaiian tough-guys. There’s a cool sequence with Baker hanging out in the apartment of a new sexual conquest. There’s a cool scene with Amy Smart tearing her own blouse open and tasering an old high-school friend. There’s a strange scene with Virginia Madsen and a pee-cup that could cause a few viewers to tune in for episode two. It’s another stupid attempt to do Tarantino TV without Tarantino, but one of the better I’ve seen.

Entertainment Weekly gives it a “B” and says:

… So odd, you must check it out. … That the more-predictable TV vet John Wells (ER) is behind Smith lends some doubt to continuing interest, but the pilot's got a lot of quirky crackle. I'm in—for another week, anyway.



USA Today gives it one star (out of four) and says:

… There's bad, and then there's criminally bad. Hands down the worst new show of the season, Smith is CBS' attempt to break out of its crime-show rut by turning the crooks into the heroes. Or anti-heroes. Or something. It's hard to say exactly what Smith has on its tiny criminal mind, other than a misguided urge to pass inert writing and indifferent acting off as edgy art.…


The Washington Post says:

… The pilot is admittedly a swift, brisk bit of escapist whimsy, but one has to wonder whether the idea of a heist every week will really prove tenable. … It's the kind of show of which one might reasonably say, "They don't miss a trick" -- except that maybe, like the Tin Man in "The Wizard of Oz," the poor thing was born without a heart. … It's just too bad that "Smith" is so slight it keeps threatening to float away, like a runaway balloon that's not quite worth chasing down the street.


The Chicago Tribune says:

“Smith” sure looks great. But beneath its glossy surfaces, there’s little substance.… whether we care about the plight of Stevens, whose gang is capable of stunning brutality, rests in the drama’s execution. And that’s where “Smith” lives up to its bland name. It’s possible to create a TV series about people whose actions are reprehensible (and in this pilot, four people die), but the writing and performances have to be so compelling that the viewer feels drawn to watching what these ambiguous characters do. But “Smith” is so thinly written, and the characters so generic, that it’s hard to feel much for this series except admiration for its cinematography. …


The Houston Chronicle says:

… the densely plotted Smith is rewarding on its own terms. … the pilot of Smith is ingeniously complex, at least by general TV standards. This is the kind of show that you'll want to watch twice just to make sure how all the plot points fit together. … Yet the elements that make Smith so smart and savvy could also keep the drama from attracting a large audience. Some viewers may have trouble rooting for a gang of hoods on a weekly basis, especially with the show's dark thematic tone, spasms of violence and twisted timeline. But for those going through Sopranos or Thief withdrawal, Smith is a godsend.


Variety says:

… Interesting but not fully compelling, it's a long shot to make a big score. … the premiere doesn't fully crackle, and there's good cause for skepticism about whether this premise can be milked well enough to be sustained as a series …


The Hollywood Reporter says:

… it's hard to be enthusiastic about the chances for "Smith" despite the obvious care that went into its creation. … The cinematography is stylish, and the action sequences compare favorably to those shot for larger screens. The acting is good, sometimes even inspired, and yet there is a big problem with the show. Put simply, most of these characters are distasteful and sometimes downright repulsive. …



10 p.m. Tuesday. CBS.











Frak ME!!! “Battlestar Galactica” 2.10-2.20 (the one with the expanded "Pegasus" episode!) Goes On Sale Today!!

Find the hugely encheapened “Trek” and other sci-fi here.
Find the hugely encheapened “AD” and other comedies here.
Find the hugely encheapened “24” and other dramas here.


    + Expand All

    Readers Talkback

  • Sep 19, 2006 2:58:41 AM CDT

    eh...3 weeks

    by s0nicdeathmonkey

  • Sep 19, 2006 2:59:24 AM CDT

    also, terrible name

    by s0nicdeathmonkey

    bad, bad name

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 19, 2006 3:01:16 AM CDT

    but...if its crap

    by s0nicdeathmonkey

    it might be a huge hit.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 19, 2006 3:01:52 AM CDT

    and on an unrelated note

    by s0nicdeathmonkey

    i call bullshit on releasing HALF a season on dvd

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 19, 2006 3:17:48 AM CDT

    Virginia Madsen was smokin' hot when I was a kid.

    by shermdawg

    And she still is.If I can remember it, I'll check it out. Hell, I may even give The Unit another shot.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 19, 2006 5:22:30 AM CDT

    That's the best ensemble cast this season outside of...

    by theseeker7

    STUDIO 60 ON THE SUNSET STRIP. Anyone disagree? I mean damn, I know about Liotta of course, but I didn't know it had THIS whole crew. Funny thing is now that I think about it, it was kinda surprising to see Amanda Peet making the move to TV with STUDIO 60 just when her film career seem to be on the verge of really taking off, and it would seem the same with Amy Smart with this show. Granted she's not quite there at Peet's status yet, and as much as I don't care for any of the movies she makes, she seemed to be doing relatively quite well for herself. Not that I always take a lot of what critics say to heart (I've long said the 2 most useless jobs on the planet are high school guidance counselor and film/TV critics), but this isn't entirely encouraging. I was looking forward to a good solid 1-2 punch from CBS on Tuesdays with this following THE UNIT (which I already way dig). Of course throw in getting my dose of HOUSE on Fox at 8 and that's one quality night of TV right there.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 19, 2006 5:25:59 AM CDT

    And I also dig the name. It makes sense, think about it

    by theseeker7

    These are (what I'm assuming from all that I've heard are supposed to be) like high, if not world class criminals, which means if they're doing their jobs right, they don't call any attention to themselves where it counts. They're quite, they get in, they get out, steal the goods and walk away with a damn person being any the wiser. So it fits that the main character would have a very plain, non-descript name.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 19, 2006 6:30:16 AM CDT

    I actually liked it, Baker and Miller were great

    by chorleyfm

    However it has almost no chance of getting a full season.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 19, 2006 7:37:05 AM CDT

    BEHROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOZ!

    by osmosis jones

    Unnngh-PLOP

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 19, 2006 8:05:43 AM CDT

    you had me at "Amy Smart tearing her own blouse open"

    by newc0253

    p.s. virginia madsen doing the intro to Dune? i concur, sir, i concur.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 19, 2006 9:31:52 AM CDT

    Was interested, but now not sure

    by ues

    I already watch a show with a heist every week. It's called "Hustle". It's not fake Tarantino, either. It's just a fun, light show about some entertaining master criminals. Nobody is a makebelieve badass, they steal using their SMARTS.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 19, 2006 9:38:52 AM CDT

    Saw it last night, it's a very good show

    by bigtuna

    That USA today review is a joke. I was suprised at how evil they made Baker, an important character look. That scene on the beach is indeed very cool. It's got a very impressive cast for tv, and is very compelling. The name "Smith" makes more sense once you watch it. It's not a bad name considering. Oh, and I do think it will do well in the ratings.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 19, 2006 10:00:18 AM CDT

    THIS IS THE BEST NEW SHOW ON TV

    by jackinitraw

    I sent in a review of it a little while ago. I'm not offended. Just give it more press because this is the best new show since CSI.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 19, 2006 10:19:22 AM CDT

    Is it me...

    by childe roland

    ...or does Ray Liotta look about ten years younger than he did in Narc (which came out, what, like four years ago)? Whatever his secret is, I'll take some.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 19, 2006 10:52:35 AM CDT

    "Whatever his secret is, I'll take some."

    by shermdawg

    It's called dye & diet. He gained weight and let his hair go grey for his role in Narc.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 19, 2006 10:55:59 AM CDT

    Speaking of Liotta...

    by shermdawg

    I wish someone would buy the rights to Vice City, and do a flick. God I love that game.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 19, 2006 10:59:44 AM CDT

    So those reviewers are retarded then?

    by jackinitraw

    Does everyone hire their TV people during hire the handicapable week now? The basic critique is "we're not sure people like anti-heros". What? How dumb are these people? Would they rather more stale cop dramas? Law and Order: Jaywalking Unit? CSI Delaware? Smith is the only new show I'll be watching. They're right about it being stylish and shot like a big screen crime drama but those are GOOD THINGS!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 19, 2006 11:02:07 AM CDT

    And Herc...

    by shermdawg

    Why did you bother setting up a AICN Coaxial map on Frappr if you weren't gonna tell us?Cool statuette btw.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 19, 2006 11:09:30 AM CDT

    Are people still dismissing every crime piece...

    by jackinitraw

    ...as Tarrantino-ish? I thought we were past this. It was the smarty pants answer in 1995. That was 11 years ago. Heist dramas have been around for a long damn time and it's not like their using overly slick dialogue or giving each other little code names. This reminds me of when people said The Sopranos wouldn't last because it was too much like Goodfellas.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 19, 2006 11:35:27 AM CDT

    listen..the show was actually good

    by jarodvhale

    We got it up here in Canada last night...and you know what, I dug it..

    it's no ocean's 11 but for TV it's pretty good. Ray Liotta rocks...Simon Baker is actually pretty good....the Hawaiin thing was cool as hell....

    but it's an ok show...the reviewers are a little extreme in my opinion...it'll be interesting to see where it goes....

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 19, 2006 11:35:54 AM CDT

    Another stupid attempt to do Tarantino TV?

    by slone13

    This show is nothing like Tarantino's stuff. I've only seen the first ep, but I'm intrigued as to where the show will go. Liotta says there will be 4 to 5 heists a season.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 19, 2006 12:07:35 PM CDT

    Amy Smart much hotter in real life!!

    by the savage smeghead

    Hell's, yes, I'm rooting for this show! ...mainly because I was an extra on it, and got to meet Ms. Smart (when she had her blouse open!). So, nyahh! I got to meet her! Looking forward to seeing this tonight, and am hoping it gets picked up for a full season so more episodes can be filmed in Pittsburgh.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 19, 2006 12:53:11 PM CDT

    Great Pilot with a solid cast.

    by starkers

    When I first heard of the premise of this show I assumed it would be like CSI but with criminals, but upon seeing the pilot that presumption was shattered. Things I liked from the pilot:

    A) They don't sugar coat the characters. They are thieves because they like wealth, no bullshit reasoning like they have to provide for a sick or disabled child, save the family farm, or any other weak excuse in an attempt to make the leads sympatetic.

    B) The cast is great, Ray Liotta is solid as the lead, but Simon Baker will be the one with the most to gain - he steals every scene he is in. His introduction is perfect, and he plays the character as if he doesn't have a conscience.

    C) Minimal Dialog: They wasn't much said compared to alot of other shos out there, but when characters spoke they make what the say count. No needless exposition.

    D) Supporting cast: Chris Bauer (The Wire, Third Watch) and Shohreh Aghdashloo (24) turn up in small roles which will most likely be recurring.

    The whole thing plays out like "HEAT: The series" and has great potential if the writing stays strong.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 19, 2006 5:08:46 PM CDT

    I liked this when I first saw it a few months ago

    by whoopdeedoo

    on FX where it was called "Thief" and starred Andre Braugher.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 19, 2006 5:13:43 PM CDT

    Hmmm, all of the TB'ers reviews have me intrigued

    by lando griffin

    I may have to check it out tonight. Come to think of it I haven't really been paying attention to what is premiering and when. I don't think there is anything I usually watch on Tuesdays, if it was important I guess I would remember. The only season premieres I have already set the DVR for are Earl and The Office. (Fox animated comedies already set and started) And Lost in October is all I can think of that I am psyched for. Scrubs doesn't start until January I believe. When does the Fey comedy start? I may check that out. Otherwise I can't think of anything I am looking forward to. (When is the new season of South Park?)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 19, 2006 7:11:44 PM CDT

    whoopdeedoo

    by jackinitraw

    I loved Thief but Smith is a thousand times better. Your short term memory for mass media is awe inspiring though. There have been other shows like this. There've also been lots of cop shows but that doesn't make new ones any worse now does it Einstein?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 19, 2006 8:31:02 PM CDT

    Sounds great. You had me at "ambiguous characters."

    by mcgsstepson

    Lame TV reviewer speak for the more than one-dimensional characters that are there to be more that "sympathetic." Shit, the crap that passes the test for network and development exec.'s standards for worthy characters is reciprocated by the usual reviewer's desire for more blandness and forecasting what will get ratings which is usually instant death.

    I hope that this thing is actually good and that structure, plot, and character are more important than whether or not the character is good or bad.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 19, 2006 10:13:16 PM CDT

    I'm impressed

    by spectre agent

    Great ensemble. I appreciate the hard edge as well as opposed to similar themed shows. I never thought Amy Smart could play bad so good.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 19, 2006 10:16:00 PM CDT

    It was good. I think we may have a hit here.

    by shermdawg

    And wouldn't it be cool if they somehow worked Andre Braugher's character from Thief into the show? They certainly need to do something like that, because the cast is mostly vanilla.And have I mentioned how hot Virginia Madsen is? Wow.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 19, 2006 11:15:35 PM CDT

    Hate to swim upstream...

    by red ned lynch

    ...but first of all, it's a clear riff on Michael Mann, not Tarantino. I mean, as in obviously. Second, the character beats were brand X and off for nearly every character. The wife and I shouted "I should have married you" at the same moment, a full beat ahead of when it was delivered in the show. Some of the stuff with Liotta and Madsen was just embarrassing. That said, there wasn't a single bad scene with Baker, at least after the kind of dumb tough guy fight introduction. He sold and stole every scene he was in. And Ray had a world class moment at his salesman job, just after he talks to his "boss". Watch for it, just a thing with his eyes that is pitch damned perfect. And Amy Smart doesn't hurt my eyes. It gets a ticket to second episodesville. Hope things work out.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 20, 2006 12:32:26 AM CDT

    Have these critics seen more than the pilot?

    by ace hunter

    Personally, I think this might be the best new show of the season just based on the pilot. But they better keep Baker as is and not declaw his character.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 20, 2006 2:17:44 AM CDT

    as a sidenote...

    by s0nicdeathmonkey

    third time being first, and i've yet to ever call it. first time being 1-4 though.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 20, 2006 2:45:21 AM CDT

    USA Today couldnt be any further off the mark on this

    by fett fan

    This show fucking rocked! . . and the scene with Simon Baker as the howlie surfer getting revenge on the locals was downright chilling.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 20, 2006 3:33:52 AM CDT

    Thief was better

    by the selecter

    I like Liotta, and I'm glad he doesn't look as freaky when made-up compared to his live-look at the Emmys. Amy Smart is nice eye candy, too. However, these network attempts at morally-bankrupt badass figures don't impress. Too pretty, too polished, trying too hard to look and act like criminals -- in short, too unreal. It might impress somebody who doesn't get cable, but otherwise, bleh.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 20, 2006 5:18:07 AM CDT

    Don't care...you had me at "Virginia Madsen"

    by photoman

    I'll watch her sit at a table and drink water for 3 hours...she's one of my "three girls" that I have a thing for. Her, Nicole Kidman and Jennifer Connelly.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 20, 2006 9:09:49 AM CDT

    i don't give a damn what anyone says!

    by jacksonspole

    smith is the best show i've ever seen on network tv!! it could be because i'm a stylish deviant, but damn if i didn't watch the pilot two times in a row just because i love it so much! let me get this straight. i hate tv. i never watch it. but, last season i caught the premieres of 24 and prison break. and, damn if those two shows didn't make me rethink my whole hatred of television. and now, with the premiere of smith, i'm down for the box. smith rules! all the haters can kiss my black ass!!!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 20, 2006 9:11:15 AM CDT

    Thief sucked Selector

    by jackinitraw

    Huge anti-climax of an ending and way too many unnecessary characters.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 20, 2006 9:28:55 AM CDT

    Holy crap! What a show!

    by the__natural74

    Man, I was blown away by "Smith" last night. Wait, that didn't sound good...ACTUALLY, that is a perfect statement! I only tuned in to this show because of Liotta (who was great), but was surprised as hell that the rest of the cast was do damned talented. Those press reviews are B.S., "Smith" is easily the best show that's debuted thus far, and the violent nature of the characters totally surprised me! Great job by the network on Tuesday nights.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 20, 2006 10:42:26 AM CDT

    You had me at "Amy Smart"

    by mbeemer

    But, a few comments:

    1. I don't think it will be "a heist a week", which is a good thing. They've got enough loose ends from this caper to keep them busy for a couple of weeks.

    2. Annie should have aborted the job after she was recognized. They could have always come back and done it later. Yeah, she couldn't have known how pear-shaped things were going to go, but why take the chance?

    3. Now that I think of it, what was the plan for Annie to "slip away" after calling such attention to herself? If a fire-fight hadn't broken out she'd still be talking to the cops and wouldn't have been able to pick the guys up.

    4. I'm interested on how they'll handle all the loose ends pointing to Annie - the classmate, the waitress that might recognize a composite sketch... If Annie wasn't smart enough to write an "If anything should happen to me..." letter the smartest thing to do might be to make her "disappear" ASAP.

    5. The most sympathetic character was the car detailer who was friends with the bomb maker with the hot wife. It'll be fun to watch him hide his guilt when she starts asking if he has any idea where her husband "ran off to" and trying to resist the temptation to "comfort" her.

    Bottom line, it held my interest. I'll keep watching to see where they go with it.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 20, 2006 11:37:19 AM CDT

    Best new show of the season

    by bug doc

    The reviews of this show are way off base. OK, I'm a guy, low 40s, and I love The Wire, The Shield, Prison Break, Deadwood, Star Trek, BSG, Star Gate, and a few other "man" shows. I watched Thief and agree it was good when they were stealing stuff but no so much otherwise. Ending was a let down for sure.

    This show may become my new favorite this year. Just hope it lasts and they don't pull an HBO on it. If they change the characters from the pilot, it will be doomed.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 20, 2006 1:17:48 PM CDT

    I dug it

    by lando griffin

    but this talkback is a little bittersweet because whenever there is a positve geek consensus on a tv show it usually means it has weeks to live.

    Curious to know about the ratings for last nights episode...Herc?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 21, 2006 2:36:05 AM CDT

    jackinitraw

    by the selecter

    Thief wasn't great, but it was still better than this. And you missed the point about the show -- it wasn't about the heist per se, it was about the crew, which would have been the focus had it continued. If the Smith crew didn't have a heist, who'd give a damn about them and their clichés? Granted, this was only the pilot, so we'll see if they develop into real characters and fill the Annie plot hole. BTW, how many hitmen do you know who just happen to carry sniper rifles with them when they go surfing?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 21, 2006 10:50:22 AM CDT

    This was a great example of...

    by chromedome

    ...tired cliches-r-us stuff, and poor writing. I was disappointed, though it had many good things (Amy Smart, Virginia Madsen) it was nothing new at all. Ray seemed to be phoning in some scenes, almost looking over folks shoulders like he was reading cards. When Amy and her ex were on the plane the first time, exchanging "meaningful looks" they were BOTH looking BACK over their shoulders! Amy Smarts character (I agree with mbeemer) should have done something, anything, different than what she did when recognized, and it was a lame plan to distract the cops (well, it would certainly distract the cops) but she would have had her own get-away problem if no shots had been fired inside. She was getting cards from her friend for "girls who look a lot like" her--but that thread went nowhere. And how many times have we seen the main heister genius say "Just "n" more job(s) and that's it--I'm done" gag! Plus, if this was supposed to establish this team as slick and smooth and competent, well, it was really more like half-assed caper-planners to me. I wanted to like it--nice cinematography, production values, great casting, but dang the stories need to be tighter and the characters need to be a little more real. Did we need to know that the one guy's wife wanted to be with his partner instead--was that crucial to the episode. And why spoonfeed that with her saying it out loud? Show us, don't just tell us everything. I think they spent their budget on location shoots and cast, and forgot to include some writing and script reviews. Too bad. Maybe they can watch BSG in a couple weeks and see how it is done!

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 21, 2006 11:33:34 AM CDT

    I'd do Amy Smart from behind in Chinatown in public

    by triumph poops!

    Huh? What? >slap to the face< Oh, sorry. Just drifting off and daydreaming as to why the CRANK DVD is a must-buy when it comes out. As for SMITH, love the cast and Ray Liotta was great. He's just one of those guys that I always thought would be bigger in terms of overall star status given his intensity onscreen and ability to pull things off. So glad to see him centerstage on TV weekly. Anyone remember when he was up for BATMAN in the pre-Nolan era? That sure would have made for one great edgy Bruce Wayne.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 21, 2006 1:05:34 PM CDT

    Wow, I'm just stunned reading this...

    by theseeker7

    All these talkbackers saying this is the best new show of the season. DID WE WATCH THE SAME SHOW??? Ok now granted, I think it's a bad move to have all your leads be SO reprehensible and unlikeable, but even besides that, there's plenty more to pick on about this show. The writing was largely lackluster, far too many shots where the director was obviously just trying to come off as "cool", and I couldn't give a shit about these people. I was actually rooting for them to fail and/or be killed themselves. I was really looking forward to this - HUGE disssapointment. People that are claiming this was so much better than "Thief"... I mean... wow... I honestly don't even know what to say to you. That idea is ludicrous. The only thing comes to mind is you're so desensitized to very mediocre TV at this point since you're subjected to almost nothing else besides it, then when you simply get more, I don't know, somehow your brain reacts that it was actually "good". I for one can not wait for the return of "THIEF".

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 21, 2006 8:15:01 PM CDT

    TheSeeker7, I agree it wasn't as good as Thief.

    by shermdawg

    Nowhere near as good. But since Thief was cancelled, this is all we got.It's a shame too, that and Over There deserved longer lives.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 21, 2006 11:51:25 PM CDT

    Shermdawg -- for real, about Thief??

    by theseeker7

    Are you serious, Thief got cancelled by FX?? I never heard that. MOTHERFUCKER!!!!! Jesus Christ, I swear everyone that works in television are brainless fucking oafs.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 21, 2006 11:57:16 PM CDT

    question re: The Shield and Thief

    by theseeker7

    Is "The Shield" still on the air? Or has it by now finished out its entire run? I've never seen it so I just have no clue where it is. Because I'm just wondering (& obviously this is only pipe dreaming now) but maybe if FX had put The Shield and Thief on the same night together, I don't know, they might've complemented each other well and Thief would've done better (since I'm assuming at least part of the problem was Thief not getting good ratings)

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 22, 2006 1:47:41 AM CDT

    The Shield returns in Jan. 2007

    by the selecter

    with a "new" season, which is really the second "half" of last season. Then there will be one more after that before Vic Mackey meets his fate, whatever that will be. Thief got abysmal ratings, so it's not coming back. Braugher got a nice bit of recognition for his work, but practically nobody else noticed or watched.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 22, 2006 1:52:11 AM CDT

    Oh, but

    by the selecter

    Clifton Collins Jr. will turn up on the Shield as a guest star.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 22, 2006 4:02:07 AM CDT

    What's with this breaking up of seasons?

    by theseeker7

    Geez, you're telling mere here that The Shield is doing it, I heard the Sopranos is doing it, and also Entourage as well. This having of a substantial hiatus before they return but still classifying it as that current season, not a new one. I mean it's stupid, they're taking such long breaks, why not just call it the next season?

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 22, 2006 4:29:11 AM CDT

    No no no.

    by the selecter

    The episodes to be aired in 2007 were originally classified as the latter part of an extra-long season 5, but since there is such a gap, they're now calling them season 6, and the final season #7.

    Reply to Talkback

  • Sep 23, 2006 11:02:29 AM CDT

    The bomb makers wife

    by optimus122

    Is ORIGINAL CINDY from Dark Angel :)

    Reply to Talkback

User Login

Forgot password? Retrieve it here

or register as new user

Quick Talkback Form

Please login to post talkback