Cool News
George Clooney Is MICHAEL CLAYTON! First Test Screening Report!
Hi, everyone. "Moriarty" here with some Rumblings From The Lab...
As far as I know, this is the first reaction we’ve had for the new George Clooney film directed by Tony Gilroy that Warner Bros. may be releasing later this year. There’s no firm release date anywhere I’ve been able to find. I’m not sure how finished the version that screened was, so keep that in mind. I think the movie sounds pretty interesting, and I’m always down for a Clooney starring role. Out of all the A-list guys working right now, I think he’s one of the most consistent. He’s just as playful and genuine about his choices as Johnny Depp. Clooney’s got taste. And I’m always happy to see a writer start directing, so I hope Gilroy nails it. Anyway... here’s the review...
Yo dudes
I went to a test / advance screening of a new George Clooney movie called Michael Clayton tonight at the Paseo Colorado movie theater in Pasadena tonight.
I didn't know much about the movie before going in, other than the tiny bit of info i read on the IMDB page that said something about it being a lawyer-type thriller movie. you know the type. It was free, and i didn't have anything to really do tonight (except that i found out afterwards that there was an episode of Ghost Hunters on tonight that i missed!! damn it! i still haven't seen all of season 2!! was it a season 2 episode?! oh well, anyway, the movie was definitely worth missing the show for) so i went and saw it. This was the first screening i've been to where they actually have a section of the seats roped off for VIPs or whatever, and before the movie started a woman came out in front and said the whole deal about it being the first time it's ever been shown and that it was an unfinished print, etc. etc. "please stay in your seats when it's over because we want you to answer some questions." There were some guys dressed up in suits that sat in the roped-off seats, and i don't know if they were the guys that made the movie or just the press, but i think that, judging by the way they all knew eachother and were dressed up, they were probably the filmmakers. Anyway it was my first actual test screening rather than advance screening so i was psyched.
The story starts with George Clooney's Michael Clayton, a lawyerish law guy that works at a law office doing some back-room gambling at a chinese place and then getting a call to go help some butthole rich client guy that had done a hit and run on a jogger. After taking care of that situation and leaving, he stops at a field and looks at some horses. Then all of a sudden his car blows up two times!! Then the movie goes "4 Days Earlier", and the main story starts.
What goes on is basically that Mr. Clayton is a powerful law guy but he's down on hard times with a bar he tried to open having fallen apart and him having to sell every fixture and item in the place at auction, right down to the metal mixing bowls. The money still isn't going to cover the expenses he owes. He also has to deal with a buddy at the law firm that has gone crazy because he didn't take his pills, and his actions are threatening the future of the big law firm in the midst of the gigantic case he was working on for years and years, in which the law firm was hired to defend a fertilizer/farming chemical company called U North. That woman from Constantine that played Gabriel that was also in Narnia and The Beach (Tilda Swinton) plays the head of the legal team of this U North company, who are being sued for the deaths of hundreds of people because of the toxic chemicals used in one of their products. The lawyer that was on the case and subsequently flipped out is played by Tom Wilkinson (juntao from Rush Hour, and Batman Returns, and also Eternal Sunshine Of THe Spotless Mind). He experiences a change of heart and decides he wants to undo all the evil he's helped to defend while working as a lawyer and he wants to turn the tables on the U-North company to cleanse himself of his wrongdoings. This just won't work out good for anyone, and this sets off a chain of events that include said carbomb, a few really efficient and pretty cool spy/surveilance/assassin guys, some cars driving around a lot, and a lot of stubble on george clooney's face.
The movie was good, but felt long. It was pretty much exactly 2 hours long, but i heard people saying when it was over that it felt like it was 3 1/2 hours long and i agreed. I'm not very familiar with the law thriller type movie that follows lawsuits and carbombs and grizzled madman lawyers, but the way this one sticks out to me compared to what i am familiar with is that it wasn't all that "intense" at all. There was a lot in the middle and beginning about George Clooney's character's relationship with his son, and a book the boy was reading that i'm assuming was supposed to be like Harry Potter or something, but it was all pretty unnecessary and really killed the pace, i think.
I read on the internet afterwards that it was directed by the guy who wrote both of the Bourne movies and that this is his directorial debut. This did feel like Bourne Identity, just minus most of those little explosive action scenes. you know how the rest of that movie was kind of the type of stuff that would seem boring but was actually pretty interesting and you found yourself entertained even though it was just some dudes in an office talking about what they should do next? That's kind of how this movie was. There really aren't that many twists and turns, and since the car blowing up four days in the future at the very beginning was so unexpected and sudden, when the reason for it and the people behind it are explained later in the movie, it doesn't really come off as a surprise, it comes off more like, "well, oh, hey, ok, that's what it was then!"
I guess what i'm saying is the movie was pretty good, with the potential after some more editing and lots of cutting of extraneous scenes to be really awesome.
Before the movie, i heard some dude talking to one of the ladies running the whole event, and he said that he had gone to see Lady In THe Water the night before and that he thought it was stupid and blah blah, M. Night is a dork for putting himself so much into the movie, blah blah whatever. I haven't seen that movie and i don't really have any intention to, but not because i really care - quite the opposite - i don't care. Anyway, when the movie was over i saw that guy walk past that woman as she was handing out the survey things, and he said, "that was way worse than Lady in the Water! That movie was just stupid, but this one was painful to watch!" then he walked away. I don't think the guy could have stuck out more, because it seemed to me that everyone in the audience really enjoyed the movie. Everyone gasped at the right moments and clapped at the end, and i didn't hear any heckling whatsoever. So i would say that it received a good response. The suit guys from the roped off area were smiling and chatting with eachother happily out in the lobby afterwards, so i think they were happy, too. I just hope they don't slack off on the editing.
Edit this baby down and i think it could find a good amount of fans!
LLEPHEN
Thanks for drinking a few cups of coffee before you sat down to write, Llephen. Nicely done, and feel free to write if you see anything else.
"Moriarty" out.
-
+ Expand All
-
Aug 05, 2006 3:55:30 AM CDT
So Badly Written You'd Think It Was a Plant. But....
by heywood jablomie
....then he pans it. Quality control, please, AICN!
-
*spit take*; well-played, Mori.
-
i could spent an hour proofreading and re-reading everything i wrote and deleting all the colloquial stuff i wrote along with all the unnecessary babbling, but i didn't. cause i just wanted to give it some flavor and make it interesting to read. cause i know how it is when you go on here and see some article about some movie you haven't heard of that's way off in the future and you start reading the review and it's all cut-and-dry language like an air conditioner instruction manual..
so whatever.
thanks for posting this up moriarty!
Also the main reason i'm posting here is that i wanted to make sure everyone knows that he doesn't die in the carbomb at the beginning, because he's standing out in the field by the horses when the car blows up! So what i wrote wasn't a spoiler. I also realized reading this that i didn't mention that the acting was superb by everyone in the movie. I also forgot to mention Sydney Pollack as Michael's boss. -
He's not that great of an actor. Puh-lease.
-
For the movie, and for Ghost Hunters!
-
Yeah, it does almost sound like a planted one. Be interesting to see what happens with it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oeNhEvpab0g -
Unless, of course, illiteracy can pass for art these days.
-
I loved the Bourne movies, but this movie sounds like a wristwatch-checker.
-
And a new talkback catchphrase is born
-
New strategy: almost pan it, but not quite - in fact, contradict yourself several times. But give it exposure and a feeling of integrity and make it seem like you were just too much of an idiot to like it but others will. You can always tell a plant by the forced jovial style: talk about painful to sit through. "I still haven't seen season two of blah blah blah, was it a repeat or--?" Oh shut the fuck up.
-
"law" for the next decade. Furthermore, he has earned a sentence to 4 years at an accredited high school english class.
-
Unadulterated praise! Helloooo, Oscar! My homies and I were literally rolling in the aisles, yo! This kid is the next Brad Pitt, except cooler! Forget those other stupid movies coming out this Friday! THIS one is THE MOVIE EVENT OF THE YEAR!
-
Anyone like a glass of milk?
-
"...a lawyerish law guy that works at a law office." Best. Character portrait. EVAR!
-
I am stunned by that review. I am hoping that the author is an excellent troll rather than what he appears.
-
....Joel Siegel.
-
They filmed the car explosion scene within a few miles of my house. I hate to admit it, but for that reason alone, I will probably see this movie.
-
Otherwise they don't work. And, yes, I am probably going to hell now...
-
I don't even know what to say to these plant allegations. I am conflicted between just ignoring you children because attention is what you crave, or if i should call you all retards. I've written other reviews on here, do a search. As for the people that don't like the way i wrote this review, i don't have anything to say. you can have your opinion, but if you think i'm stupid, my opinion is that you're wrong and you need to take a better look before you open your yap.
-
the reason for that wording is that it's sort of a theme of the movie. he's not a trial lawyer and his status with the firm is not clear, and he's not exactly a lawyer. OK?
-
"I haven't seen that movie and i don't really have any intention to, but not because i really care - quite the opposite - i don't care." Bravo, sir, bravo.
-
"you can have your opinion, but if you think i'm stupid, my opinion is that you're wrong and you need to take a better look before you open your yap." You are a poet and a wordsmith and I raise a fist to whatever sort heathen dares to declare you a plant, gentle man.
-
seriously, great work. Perfect amount of people here, not too crowded and most certainly very weird. Brillant.
-
PLANT....seriously, this is pathetic.
-
is a fucking idiot...
-
Well I for one don't think this guy is a plant. Hey. What's this? "That woman from Constantine that played Gabriel that was also in Narnia and The Beach (Tilda Swinton) plays the head of the legal team...." DAMN! The gig is up bro, run run run.
-
this is the last time i'm gonna post anything in this talkback, because you kids are apparently absolutely incorrigible. I was thinking about responding and saying that you guys are really really stupid, because what kind of planted review would be so vaguely positive/negative? what kind of hype would that generate? does logic work with you kids? But then i realized that "plant" is probably just what gets triggered in your brain cells when you read a review on this site that's not written the exact same way as every other review ever (in other words, the type of review that gets me labelled "a fucking idiot"). Whatever. I already look stupid enough just for responding to this crap so personally, so this is where i take my leave. Let the accusations and insults fly from here on out, kiddos.
-
Sounds like a bad movie regardless.
-
and just some dude sitting at his computer for longer than he should like all the rest of us . . . which makes this that much sweeter. FUCK YOUR FAKE ASS REVIEW, YOU PLANT BITCH! Ha! C'mon ya'll! This shit is fun.
-
Hope he's better than Steven Tyler was in that Get Shorty sequel. But seriously llephen, if you're a regular at this site, then surely you must've known you were gonna get flogged for the poor quality of that review. Prove them all wrong by making the next one a little tighter.
Readers Talkback
User Login
Top Talkbacks
- Whitney Houston 1963 - 2012 -- 209 total posts 207 posts
- AVENGERS enemy revealed as pink boardgame pieces... You might suffer some form of elation... SPOILERS!!! -- 160 total posts 97 posts
- There's a STAR TREK video game that is going to lead into JJ's STAR TREK 2 apparently... -- 144 total posts 77 posts
- Here's The Red Band Trailer For Drafthouse Films' THE FP! -- 68 total posts 68 posts
- New JUDGE DREDD post production footage pops up -- 67 total posts 67 posts
- Does ‘SNL’ Rhyme With ‘Deschanel’?? Learn Which SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE Vet Hosts After Sexy Zooey!! -- 64 total posts 60 posts
- To Commemorate The 3D Release Of STAR WARS EPISODE I: THE PHANTOM MENACE, George Lucas Wants You To Know...Greedo Shoots First!! -- 480 total posts 55 posts
- HANNA's Saoirse Ronan to boss around seven little people -- 53 total posts 50 posts
- Friday Brings SWEEPS DAY NINE!! Gab Here About Tonight’s FRINGE!! Plus Einstein on TIM, Wiig On PORTLANDIA, MAHER, CLONE, GIFTED, GRIMM, SPARTACUS, SUPERNATURAL, GOLD RUSH And More!! -- 118 total posts 32 posts
- SPACE 2099!! -- 182 total posts 27 posts