Home Cool News Coaxial Reviews Zone Chat Contact Us Sign in

Merrick Thinks LADY IN THE WATER Flounders, BUT...


Merrick here...


Folks have been talking a lot of trash about M. Night Shyamalan's LADY IN THE WATER (the absence of the word "THE" before "LADY" really bothers me in this title, by the way); I've been one of those people.

Truth be told, I went into this film ready to hate it...expecting to hate it...but I didn't "hate" it. I didn't really "like" it, either. Which, in a way, is worse -- the morsels of "goodness" to be found here serve as a constant and frustrating illustration of what could have been. But, in the end, LADY is handicapped by one of the most confused filmic identities ever on projected onto a theater screen.

It's impossible to discuss this film without a level of significant spoilage, so...



BEWARE SPOILERS FROM THIS POINT FORWARD!!!



First off, you should know that this movie is being woefully misadvertised.

It's being sold as something of a supernatural horror film with an oppressive atmosphere. It is none of these things. LADY is, first and foremost, a fantasy film...a character driven fantasy drama...with a surprising quantity of (intentionally) comedic elements, and some genuine tenderness. LADY's trailers and promotional material give you little sense of what this movie actually is - which is either complete genius, or a woeful disservice, depending on how one looks at it.

So, throw any "spooky horror" preconceptions out the window. Instead, think of this film in terms of BATTERIES NOT INCLUDED and COCOON. "Yeah, that's unlikely" you say? Well, if remember those films, consider this:

LADY IN THE WATER is about a chick from a magical, watery neverland who comes to our world on a mission. Her mission brings her to a massive apartment complex in Philadelphia, whose broadly-drawn characters must 1) figure out her purpose; 2) figure out how to return this visitor to her world; 3) defend her against the bushy monsters trying to stop her (killer Chia Pets), and 4) physically help her get back to her world. COCOON. BATTERIES NOT INCLUDED (which was also set in an apartment building, by the way). E.T.

What's her mission?

Somewhere in the apartment complex, an author is letting a book languish. Should it be published, this book will be the framework for a grand new enlightenment -- used by world leaders to shepherd in a new age for mankind. She's here to push that through. BILL AND TED'S EXCELLENT ADVENTURE.

Fate will exact a high price for this author's success. In other words...the author is a martyr being sacrificed on the altar of creativity. And this writer is played by...

M. NIGHT!!!

In effect, Shyamalan casts himself, in a major role, as something of a modern day Jesus -- someone whose work transcends politics, cultures, and national borders. Someone whose works live on forever, despite its detractors. A "fuck you" to critics or naysayers? Complete, total, self-aggrandizing madness? A little bit of both?

It's hard to say for sure, and herein lies the film's most major shortcoming. This is a bit like casting, say, Hitchcock as the principal villain in one of his own films. It's distracting, disingenuous. It pulls us out of the movie, and turns the story into...something else. And, in the case of LADY IN THE WATER, it's nearly impossbile to separate Night's on-screen character from the filmmaker's controversial personae.

As such, any heart, soul, or pathos the character may have conveyed is quickly drained away. The Lady's mission, thus the crux of the plot, is marginalzied. A character who may have served as a powerful icon for self-sacrifice...and could have shown that true strength can sometimes be found in the most unlikely places...essentially becomes an exercise in vanity. Or, at the very best, a whopping big, flashing neon question mark.

If Shyamalan persists on honing his image as a martyred creator, he should stop thinking of himself as a "brand" and focus more heavily on ensuring that his on-screen material actually pays off. Otherwise, he's merely proving his detractors right.

There's another startling example of conceptual awkwardness and creative double standard afoot: a character in the film...a movie critic...openly laments the derivative and stereotyped nature of current cinema. In an overtly, over-written way. But, LADY IN THE WATER is, itself, staggeringly derivative -- primarily in that it's a riff on the titles mentioned above. So, uhhhh.....???

This same critic also asks why so many films feature characters standing around in the rain -- LADY ends in a fierce rain storm. Shyamalan repeatedly nukes clichés, yet consistently relies on these same clichés to tell his story, which can't be seen as anything but a double standard -- no matter what "statement" he's trying to make.

It's entirely feasible that M. Night is, simply, having fun with us -- and possibly making fun of himself along the way. The problem is: it's never clear what tone we're supposed to go with here; that elusive balance between sincerity and smart satire (a la Verhoven) is never found. LADY feels like a film that's struggling to find its own identity, but it ends up being so internally conflicted that it finds no identity at all.

Flagrant logic gaps (when you see the movie, think about how much easier the whole "Who is the Lady?" scenario would have been if the lead, or anyone around him, had thought to use the damn Internet) abound. And, some viewers may find the film's racial stereotyping a tad disquieting: there is a large family of chubby, loud Mexicans...jabbering/screaming Asians play a big part, too. I think the movie is missing a fat, lazy black guy -- but perhaps he'll show up in a director's cut.

There are many more negatives that I haven't even touched on here; a few are actually quite embarrassing. So, it's fair to ask, "How did I end up not completely hating the movie?"

As misguided, inappropriate, and frustrating as the film often is - there's also a lot of charm on screen; subtle moments of character and sweetness that come about in unexpected ways, and are found in unexpected places.

With so much upheaval happening in our world (and our country) right now, it's uplifting...and even empowering...to be reminded that true strength, and true hope, lies not with governments or institutions, but within ourselves and the choices we make.

It's also refreshing to be left with a feeling that somehow, in some way, everything will be okay. Not just for the characters (well, everyone but M. Night...)...but for ourselves and our world.

It is in these moments, and through their nuance, that Shyamalan shines most brightly. There is true heart and soul to be found here, and when it works it works so well that I'd be quite interested in seeing the director tackle a straight-up character piece next. Returning to his roots, so to speak. Abandoning the sensational elements which seem to confound him, and bog him down.

When all is said and done, I suspect that LADY was never truly intended to be about storytelling -- that it's merely a vehicle through which Shyamalan hopes to get people talking. Not about the story, but about what HE did, and why HE did it. Whether or not this was actually what he set out to accomplish is a question that can only be answered by M. Night himself -- and, if he's smart, he won't answer that question. Because, in a way, it's far more intriguing to wonder what the hell he was doing and thinking...than to actually know. Which means (irritatingly): the same lack of clarity that makes the film an artistic disappointment may ultimately be the greatest ingredient in its longevity.

LADY IN THE WATER is a sloppy, gargantuan, often confounding mess. But it's an inconsistent mess, and it's an intriguing mess. Neither qualifier excuses the film's voluminous missteps...they don't even come close. But they do make the experience a bit more tolerable, if only for the sake of discussion.


MERRICK!!!










AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Click for previous story Talk Back More on this story Click for next story

User login


Reader Talkback

There's something unlikable about you
by Engineer_at_peac
Jul 19th, 2006
10:36:50 AM
whoa am i first?
by occula
Jul 19th, 2006
10:37:50 AM
ENGINEER
by Joseph Merrick
Jul 19th, 2006
10:39:06 AM
still hopefull
by thecheesegrommit
Jul 19th, 2006
10:41:20 AM
This is the only good review on the site so far though
by Engineer_at_peac
Jul 19th, 2006
10:43:15 AM
wow 2nd??? whatever... not gonna spend money on it
by DarthMartel
Jul 19th, 2006
10:45:04 AM
damn I shoulda posted faster
by DarthMartel
Jul 19th, 2006
10:46:31 AM
occula
by thecheesegrommit
Jul 19th, 2006
10:47:22 AM
Here's the Review ...
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
10:51:40 AM
My dad still calls them Orientals
by Terry_1978
Jul 19th, 2006
10:52:38 AM
"jabbering/screaming Orientals"
by Lando Griffin
Jul 19th, 2006
10:52:43 AM
YACK
by Joseph Merrick
Jul 19th, 2006
10:54:16 AM
cheesegrommit: If I may interupt...
by brycemonkey
Jul 19th, 2006
10:54:38 AM
Yuuuuuccckkkkk
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
10:55:17 AM
BRYCE
by Joseph Merrick
Jul 19th, 2006
10:55:41 AM
You douche bags
by JuggFuckler
Jul 19th, 2006
10:56:09 AM
bigboxer shush, the grown-ups are talking.
by brycemonkey
Jul 19th, 2006
10:56:42 AM
Merrick - you don't have to check for dingleberries
by Lando Griffin
Jul 19th, 2006
10:57:07 AM
Big Thumbs Down .....
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
10:57:41 AM
Really?
by brycemonkey
Jul 19th, 2006
10:59:21 AM
Sorry Merrick I don't have a large enough...
by brycemonkey
Jul 19th, 2006
11:00:46 AM
Why oh Why ...
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
11:02:17 AM
casting himself as the writer is as bad as...
by malcolm_mccallum
Jul 19th, 2006
11:06:00 AM
Moriarty's Waiting Til Last AGAIN
by Ringwearer9
Jul 19th, 2006
11:06:53 AM
Having a huge ego is one thing ...
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
11:08:57 AM
There's a reason many people suggest
by CreasyBear
Jul 19th, 2006
11:11:38 AM
Ringwearer...
by Mr Nice Gaius
Jul 19th, 2006
11:11:56 AM
We can only hope ..
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
11:16:25 AM
It isn't that the director cast himself...
by R H S C
Jul 19th, 2006
11:18:50 AM
It's the ACTING ABILITY !!!
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
11:23:15 AM
Allow myself to rebut . . . myself.
by CreasyBear
Jul 19th, 2006
11:24:44 AM
your avatar couldnt be more off putting
by Fearsme
Jul 19th, 2006
11:26:01 AM
I don't have anything against Loopy
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
11:28:28 AM
Night's Dark Tower
by Cumlauncher
Jul 19th, 2006
11:29:44 AM
Please try and be more insulting bigboxer...
by brycemonkey
Jul 19th, 2006
11:32:17 AM
Wouldn't it have been better if...
by Silverhour
Jul 19th, 2006
11:32:25 AM
If only the studios ...
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
11:36:01 AM
The Shama thing is getting really old
by Cumlauncher
Jul 19th, 2006
11:39:29 AM
It would have been better ..
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
11:40:38 AM
Merrick,
by malcolm_mccallum
Jul 19th, 2006
11:45:06 AM
The last name ...
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
11:46:28 AM
MALCOLM
by Joseph Merrick
Jul 19th, 2006
11:47:07 AM
I like Merricks reviews because
by veritasses
Jul 19th, 2006
11:47:26 AM
I just can't believe ...
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
11:52:35 AM
oh man
by Mechasheeva
Jul 19th, 2006
11:54:28 AM
Black Lady
by Crash Crator
Jul 19th, 2006
11:57:28 AM
Swamidingleberry ...
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
11:59:17 AM
CRASH
by Joseph Merrick
Jul 19th, 2006
12:01:43 PM
Sam I am.
by malcolm_mccallum
Jul 19th, 2006
12:05:11 PM
Labor of Love is what he should be making
by Cumlauncher
Jul 19th, 2006
12:07:09 PM
Adaptation anyone?
by Mooly
Jul 19th, 2006
12:08:06 PM
enough with the fucking misspelling of his name
by mikey mike
Jul 19th, 2006
12:10:35 PM
Great review for what sounds like an awful film
by Trazadone
Jul 19th, 2006
12:11:57 PM
Adapt deez nuts!
by Cumlauncher
Jul 19th, 2006
12:16:15 PM
"...most probable stereotype..."
by Crash Crator
Jul 19th, 2006
12:20:52 PM
Like I said ...
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
12:22:06 PM
WOW
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
12:26:36 PM
Hi ALL!
by CyberVishnu
Jul 19th, 2006
12:26:42 PM
Uh Ohhhh,
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
12:29:30 PM
Cum: I agree with you but cannot condone your post
by brycemonkey
Jul 19th, 2006
12:30:13 PM
Trail and error
by MrNelson
Jul 19th, 2006
12:32:26 PM
Of what post do you speak of?
by Cumlauncher
Jul 19th, 2006
12:34:41 PM
Eh... Trial and Error
by MrNelson
Jul 19th, 2006
12:36:19 PM
Although MNS might be onto something...
by brycemonkey
Jul 19th, 2006
12:38:57 PM
Cum: the one that stretched the talk back...
by brycemonkey
Jul 19th, 2006
12:40:18 PM
Cleveland Heap
by DonkeyBalls
Jul 19th, 2006
12:46:01 PM
And now it isn't stretched...
by brycemonkey
Jul 19th, 2006
12:52:29 PM
Ahh, your post got deleted.
by brycemonkey
Jul 19th, 2006
12:53:59 PM
Y'know speaking of strokes..
by Cumlauncher
Jul 19th, 2006
01:05:13 PM
Bummer, dude
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
01:05:16 PM
The Fountain trailer =
by Fierias
Jul 19th, 2006
01:09:05 PM
The Fountain trailer =
by Fierias
Jul 19th, 2006
01:09:37 PM
Ummm.. If your dick is the trunk...
by Fish Tank
Jul 19th, 2006
01:09:39 PM
The self fellating
by HessenRoots
Jul 19th, 2006
01:14:26 PM
Of Course ...
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
01:18:14 PM
Word to the Night Haters
by Flickerhead
Jul 19th, 2006
01:19:00 PM
Article in the USA Today:
by mrfan
Jul 19th, 2006
01:22:11 PM
ken burns complains about night's self promotion
by Silver Shamrock
Jul 19th, 2006
01:22:20 PM
I do support directors with conviction
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
01:26:24 PM
Imagine if Shamalan teamed up with Pixar
by durhay
Jul 19th, 2006
01:30:31 PM
I hope this movie makes $2.50
by Ricky Henderson
Jul 19th, 2006
01:30:38 PM
YACK
by Joseph Merrick
Jul 19th, 2006
01:32:52 PM
Mori's review is late because this movie comatized him
by Ricky Henderson
Jul 19th, 2006
01:33:37 PM
With a girl?
by brycemonkey
Jul 19th, 2006
01:34:37 PM
Gardenburgers are delicous, though.
by Engineer_at_peac
Jul 19th, 2006
01:34:54 PM
YACK
by Joseph Merrick
Jul 19th, 2006
01:35:02 PM
A peek into an "artist's" ego
by BobParr
Jul 19th, 2006
01:35:03 PM
Thanks for the review, Merrick
by Eaglet1138
Jul 19th, 2006
01:35:12 PM
NNNnnnnnnnnoooooooo
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
01:35:26 PM
Durhay..
by mrfan
Jul 19th, 2006
01:35:34 PM
What's a "Hack," Bigboxer?
by Flickerhead
Jul 19th, 2006
01:35:58 PM
Hey hey Yack,
by Ricky Henderson
Jul 19th, 2006
01:36:46 PM
Is that the first ever black double post?
by brycemonkey
Jul 19th, 2006
01:37:06 PM
A singularity occurred when Merrick procreated...
by Ricky Henderson
Jul 19th, 2006
01:39:32 PM
What am I, a dictionary ???
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
01:42:18 PM
Display Sumthin' ???
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
01:43:51 PM
RE: my avatar
by Joseph Merrick
Jul 19th, 2006
01:45:13 PM
Hmmm
by HessenRoots
Jul 19th, 2006
01:45:35 PM
Wowsers !!!
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
01:48:33 PM
Bigboxer
by HessenRoots
Jul 19th, 2006
01:51:07 PM
Like ...
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
01:54:32 PM
bigboxer: please stop spouting nonsense.
by brycemonkey
Jul 19th, 2006
02:02:50 PM
Oooowwwwwwww !!!!!
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
02:05:14 PM
He could
by HessenRoots
Jul 19th, 2006
02:05:25 PM
Is Shamalamadingdong Speilberg's Protegee?
by Ricky Henderson
Jul 19th, 2006
02:09:10 PM
Occular...
by Harysuxafat1
Jul 19th, 2006
02:10:30 PM
Seee, SEEEEE !!!
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
02:10:55 PM
What a tweest!
by SpyGuy
Jul 19th, 2006
02:11:20 PM
Yack the Ballsack
by Flickerhead
Jul 19th, 2006
02:12:39 PM
By The Way,
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
02:13:15 PM
"Couldn't have said it better myself."
by Flickerhead
Jul 19th, 2006
02:14:46 PM
Not like Hitchcock casting himself as a villain...
by Dr Lizardo
Jul 19th, 2006
02:15:04 PM
Yeah, Unbreakable Angered me for the same reason Yack
by Ricky Henderson
Jul 19th, 2006
02:18:09 PM
It's like, it's like ...
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
02:20:25 PM
Flickerhead: I was thinking the same thing...
by brycemonkey
Jul 19th, 2006
02:24:05 PM
Allllllrrrrrriiiigggghhtttt ...
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
02:28:47 PM
Hey Wait !!!!
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
02:30:40 PM
I can see the point you are making Flicker re:
by brycemonkey
Jul 19th, 2006
02:31:35 PM
Unbreakable
by malcolm_mccallum
Jul 19th, 2006
02:35:17 PM
But wait ...
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
02:36:06 PM
terrible avatar
by jrbarker
Jul 19th, 2006
02:42:03 PM
No bigboxer, we aren't on the same wavelenght.
by brycemonkey
Jul 19th, 2006
02:42:09 PM
HessenRoots
by Flickerhead
Jul 19th, 2006
02:43:28 PM
I KNEW IT ...
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
02:45:17 PM
Oh dear, did you read the 'Think about it...
by brycemonkey
Jul 19th, 2006
02:47:01 PM
I'll do it better..
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
02:50:14 PM
Watch the dosage, bigboxer.
by CreasyBear
Jul 19th, 2006
02:53:59 PM
Tim Story raped my puppy!
by brycemonkey
Jul 19th, 2006
02:58:52 PM
CreasyBear
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
03:00:40 PM
Doesnt Chicken George get immediatel banned if he posts
by Ricky Henderson
Jul 19th, 2006
03:17:48 PM
Oh I read that gem of a review...
by Ricky Henderson
Jul 19th, 2006
03:23:32 PM
Yack: Must... resist... Harry... Fiance... joke!
by brycemonkey
Jul 19th, 2006
03:23:56 PM
Crap man. You don't see that every day.
by zerogundamx
Jul 19th, 2006
03:25:39 PM
If Harry & Chicken George are indeed the same person,
by CreasyBear
Jul 19th, 2006
03:28:39 PM
Unbreakable
by BobParr
Jul 19th, 2006
03:35:32 PM
Heya Flick,
by HessenRoots
Jul 19th, 2006
03:38:19 PM
Can we have a contest for your avatar??
by quadrupletree
Jul 19th, 2006
03:39:31 PM
Just a question, Hessenroots . . .
by Mechasheeva
Jul 19th, 2006
03:44:20 PM
Yack: HAAAAAHAAAHAAHAAA!
by CreasyBear
Jul 19th, 2006
03:44:39 PM
Holy crap, YackBacker, you weren't kidding.
by ExcaliburFfolkes
Jul 19th, 2006
03:46:48 PM
Wait, I thought Harry's girl was caucasian
by Ricky Henderson
Jul 19th, 2006
03:47:03 PM
that's seriously not okay
by Mechasheeva
Jul 19th, 2006
03:48:54 PM
Whats up with that artwork?
by DoctorWho?
Jul 19th, 2006
03:49:06 PM
Yack: "The Audience is the clit."
by brycemonkey
Jul 19th, 2006
03:52:40 PM
Ummm, excuse me ...
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
03:53:59 PM
I'm not proud of it, but I gotta say that
by CreasyBear
Jul 19th, 2006
03:55:58 PM
Flickerhead
by antonphd
Jul 19th, 2006
04:01:41 PM
Show me an established director...
by Rakafraker
Jul 19th, 2006
04:01:44 PM
Gilliam=Genius
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
04:08:56 PM
Name a Director ??
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
04:11:48 PM
Mecha
by HessenRoots
Jul 19th, 2006
04:13:47 PM
In order of importance:
by Childe Roland
Jul 19th, 2006
04:14:21 PM
Too easy bigboxer...
by brycemonkey
Jul 19th, 2006
04:15:35 PM
Cap'n Jack, that's some funny shite.
by Rakafraker
Jul 19th, 2006
04:15:44 PM
merricks review
by biggles2_22
Jul 19th, 2006
04:18:02 PM
Oh, man! The Blade II review!
by Childe Roland
Jul 19th, 2006
04:19:37 PM
Hessen: Waaaaaaaait wait wait
by Mechasheeva
Jul 19th, 2006
04:22:34 PM
That depends, bigboxer.
by Rakafraker
Jul 19th, 2006
04:24:21 PM
Mecha
by HessenRoots
Jul 19th, 2006
04:25:25 PM
Oh, oh Yeah ???
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
04:25:37 PM
Quit spitting out your meds, bigboxer.
by Rakafraker
Jul 19th, 2006
04:29:15 PM
Are you sayin' what I think yer sayin'
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
04:29:36 PM
This has been interesting, but...
by Rakafraker
Jul 19th, 2006
04:32:20 PM
Too Late, i spit 'em out earlier today ..
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
04:32:38 PM
Rakafraker: don't waste your breath...
by brycemonkey
Jul 19th, 2006
04:34:08 PM
OK...One more, then I'm out.
by Rakafraker
Jul 19th, 2006
04:36:16 PM
YackBacker
by antonphd
Jul 19th, 2006
04:38:19 PM
Glad You Agree ...
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
04:40:40 PM
I wonder if this thing'll tank?
by The Dum Guy
Jul 19th, 2006
05:16:53 PM
Will It Tank?
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
05:26:10 PM
Good points YackBacker.
by mrfan
Jul 19th, 2006
05:30:14 PM
stupid fanboys
by lorddagon
Jul 19th, 2006
05:38:44 PM
Spike Lee ...
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
05:43:00 PM
bigboxer
by lorddagon
Jul 19th, 2006
05:44:48 PM
Oooohhhh Noooooooo
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
05:51:18 PM
cmon yackbacker
by lorddagon
Jul 19th, 2006
05:54:19 PM
Again, I agree with YackBacker
by nonsensical
Jul 19th, 2006
05:56:14 PM
Ahhemmmm ....
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
06:01:07 PM
See how easy that was!
by nonsensical
Jul 19th, 2006
06:25:50 PM
good or bad
by malcolm_mccallum
Jul 19th, 2006
06:36:09 PM
Thanks for the info Hessen!
by Mechasheeva
Jul 19th, 2006
06:41:30 PM
bad
by The Dum Guy
Jul 19th, 2006
06:43:12 PM
10 percent on rottentomatoes
by BannedOnTheRun
Jul 19th, 2006
06:47:37 PM
What a SuckFest
by bigboxer
Jul 19th, 2006
07:12:46 PM
Honestly, not sure.
by nonsensical
Jul 19th, 2006
07:23:25 PM
Let me clarify...
by nonsensical
Jul 19th, 2006
07:25:44 PM
Oh yeah...
by nonsensical
Jul 19th, 2006
07:27:03 PM
One thing is absolutely certain...
by JohnGalt06
Jul 19th, 2006
07:34:25 PM
Cap N Jack
by BobParr
Jul 19th, 2006
07:51:30 PM
Un ... break ... able ...
by falawful-314
Jul 19th, 2006
08:12:46 PM
Thanks Malcom -
by SAVOIR_faire
Jul 19th, 2006
08:47:10 PM
The Script
by Black Satin 2
Jul 19th, 2006
11:23:23 PM
Yep, Night has the freedom to make any movie he wants
by Orbots Commander
Jul 20th, 2006
12:04:36 AM
Does it matter that M. Night has cast himself?
by mrevilbreakfast
Jul 20th, 2006
01:48:17 AM
Crap
by PapanikiSimbimbo
Jul 20th, 2006
03:28:47 AM
Let it be
by kanain
Jul 20th, 2006
03:40:56 AM
YackBacker
by antonphd
Jul 20th, 2006
06:09:31 AM
PapanikiSimbimbo
by antonphd
Jul 20th, 2006
06:13:08 AM
FIRST!!!
by BannedOnTheRun
Jul 20th, 2006
08:52:46 AM
Movie Talkers
by NightArrows
Jul 20th, 2006
09:08:45 AM
I bet M Night is like Tarantino
by rev_skarekroe
Jul 20th, 2006
10:20:26 AM
Saw it on Monday...
by skizzy
Jul 20th, 2006
10:28:18 AM
Reviewers needed? Just a question, i think, or was it?
by blackeyz
Jul 20th, 2006
04:44:19 PM
The MNS haters need to stop slamming reviews for not...
by minderbinder
Jul 21st, 2006
09:37:22 AM

Quick Talkback

Please login to post talkback.