Ain't It Cool News (
Movie News

Want To See The SPIDER-MAN 3 Teaser Trailer?!

Hi, everyone. "Moriarty" here with some Rumblings From The Lab...

Me, too. But for now, this shot-for-shot description by Colby Jack is going to have to do:

Spiderman 3 Teaser #1 1:38

0-0:24 Closeup of red suit

siver lettering - "How Long"

0:25 "Can Any Man"

"Fight The Darkness..."

0:30 Black Goo oozing up over the suit.

"Before He Finds It"

"In Himself"

0:40 Camera pulls back to reveal BLACK spiderman in gargoyle pose in the rain

--0:55 Quick shots of all major players back in the story

0:56 Spiderman laying in bed and black web/goo seems to grab his hand from below

MJ(?) Voice over: "What's Happening?"

PP Voice over: "I Don't Know, But I Have to stop it"

1:03 Quick cuts:

Action scenes:

1:05 Giant sandperson (think Mummy) against a city building.

1:06 PP and MJ kissing while laying in a spider web.

1:07 person on green goblin flying gizmo


1:14 PP falling backwards grasping for wedding ring(?) very similar to LOTR scene.


1:18 PP rips open shirt to reveal BLACK suit


1:20-1:30 camera pans around to show black spidey against a mirrored skyscraper with the reflection being red spidey.

1:33 GIANT "3" onscreen

MAY 4th

Okay. Yes, please. Just one more reason to go see SUPERMAN as soon as it opens, I s’pose. Thanks for the tease, Colby Jack.

"Moriarty" out.

Readers Talkback
comments powered by Disqus
    + Expand All
  • June 23, 2006, 4:21 a.m. CST


    by EeeJay

  • June 23, 2006, 4:22 a.m. CST

    Too soon!

    by b3mike


  • June 23, 2006, 4:22 a.m. CST

    by ganymede2010


  • June 23, 2006, 4:22 a.m. CST

    by TheBoyFromUlster

    Sounds good....But will it be as good as The second I don't think so. Hard to keep up that standard....

  • June 23, 2006, 4:22 a.m. CST

    Mori, I hate you.

    by Virtual Satyr

    That was a dirty trick, but this teaser sounds very interesting.

  • June 23, 2006, 4:22 a.m. CST


    by Stewie_Griffin

    Sounds good. I have faith in Raimi, this will be great

  • June 23, 2006, 4:24 a.m. CST

    Foist & b3mike! EAT ME! You cut in front of me:)

    by ganymede2010


  • June 23, 2006, 4:26 a.m. CST

    What was the point of that?

    by zeoscope20

    I wanted to see the damn trailer, not read about it.

  • June 23, 2006, 4:26 a.m. CST

    Spidey 2 was great....

    by Mr_Sleep001

    ....but what was with those awful CGI helicopters at the end of the film? They looked awful, especially after a film filled with awesome effect after awesome effect. Hopefully Raimi will steer clear of such gaffs in #3

  • June 23, 2006, 4:26 a.m. CST

    That black goo...

    by pencil-man me making whoopie in my pants. Bring on Venom you hoary bitches.

  • June 23, 2006, 4:26 a.m. CST

    Can't Wait!!!

    by grievenom

    for the trailer or the movie. Raimi, don't let me down!

  • June 23, 2006, 4:29 a.m. CST


    by VinnyMac666

    Sounds very cool...

  • June 23, 2006, 4:29 a.m. CST


    by VinnyMac666

    That's what I get for looking at the story and then going down for a snack... and not refreshing the page

  • June 23, 2006, 4:30 a.m. CST

    Let me guess...

    by Ronald Raygun

    ...set to the music of that stupid operatic chorus that plays over every action movie trailer.

  • June 23, 2006, 4:33 a.m. CST

    What does a Scanner See?

    by thelivingdoll

    I don't know, a barcode I guess...

  • June 23, 2006, 4:40 a.m. CST

    Movie Trailer in Theaters

    by SpideyMan

    After you see it in theaters, make sure to send you spotting to --- --- which tracks which trailers are playing with what movies in theaters...

  • June 23, 2006, 4:43 a.m. CST

    I was wondering when we'd get a masturbation scene...

    by thelivingdoll

    "laying in bed and web/goo seems to grab his hand from below." What teenager can't relate to that?

  • June 23, 2006, 4:48 a.m. CST

    So, is TEXT "LIES"...

    by thelivingdoll

    The sequel to True Lies? If so they'd better cast Jamie Lee Curtis, since, like opened milk, she only gets better with age. Or wait...

  • June 23, 2006, 5:04 a.m. CST

    So does this mean. . .

    by Venardhi

    Venom is like, Peter Parker's undeveloped conjoined fetus, mutated by the spider venom?

  • June 23, 2006, 5:09 a.m. CST

    Please Moriarty...

    by TraumReiter

    ...don't do this again. Never ever!!!

  • June 23, 2006, 5:14 a.m. CST


    by Orionsangels

  • June 23, 2006, 5:17 a.m. CST

    hard to believe

    by First

    It's hard to believe that script is real, with all those grammatical errors.

  • June 23, 2006, 5:25 a.m. CST

    "How long"?

    by TraumReiter

    24 seconds showing a close up of the red suite? No voice over and the letters "how long"? Well I can tell you how long: very, very long!

  • June 23, 2006, 5:37 a.m. CST

    Y'all know the drill. HIDDEN FACE...TEASER IMAGE!!!

    by Shermdawg ..."With great knowledge comes great persecution." (Wait...that's not how it goes...)

  • June 23, 2006, 5:44 a.m. CST


    by Steve Rogers

  • June 23, 2006, 5:56 a.m. CST


    by Mr_Sleep001

    So all the positive press Supes has been getting, coupled with a taste for superhero flicks (look at X3's box office) and a pre existing market (older supes fans, new supes fans and comic book geeks in general hardly signals a bad fate for this. As for Bryan Singer's career, well he's on board for a sequal, forayed into TV and is working on other projects...oh yeah really circling the crapper!

  • June 23, 2006, 5:57 a.m. CST

    Venom better have a white spider.

    by Rant Breath

    I'm really tired of Raimi making stupid changes.

  • June 23, 2006, 6:01 a.m. CST

    Rant Breath

    by Mr_Sleep001

    Those changes have worked for the best cinematically. It's always happening in the comic universe, why not extend that to the screen??

  • June 23, 2006, 6:07 a.m. CST

    by Charlie_Brown

    I found this trailer on last week. (I thought it was a fake because of the black-suit). The trailer I saw also had the Hobgoblin.

  • June 23, 2006, 6:14 a.m. CST

    Man, what a cocktease

    by harosa

  • June 23, 2006, 6:16 a.m. CST


    by Ridge

    One would think Moriarty would have an unreasonable unfounded hatred against the superman movie... nah that couldn't be it?

  • June 23, 2006, 6:16 a.m. CST

    WTF That was just MEAN!!

    by antonphd

    You are evil Moriarty. EVIL. You should change your name from... wait... nevermind. :P

  • June 23, 2006, 6:17 a.m. CST

    Yuck, black goo bukkake

    by CrispyOne


  • June 23, 2006, 6:30 a.m. CST

    "those changes have worked best cinematically"

    by Rant Breath

    HAHAHA!!! You mean like the shitty Green Goblin costume and making Dr.Ock a good guy? Oh yeah where would Spider-man be without Sam "never read comics" Raimi?

  • June 23, 2006, 6:37 a.m. CST

    Am I the only one who likes Mori's "joke"?

    by DerLanghaarige

  • June 23, 2006, 6:41 a.m. CST


    by ZaphodBB

    this text play-by-play is so fake! You can see the PhotoShop work clearly where Moriarty slipped in the words "BLACK suit" over top of "RED suit". It's a fake, dammit! THERE IS NO BLACK SUIT!!

  • June 23, 2006, 6:46 a.m. CST

    PP Voice over: "I Don't Know, But I Have to stop it"

    by samsnee79

    Isn't that a variation of the line from the first movie, after Harry asks "What was that thing?"

  • June 23, 2006, 7 a.m. CST


    by Mr_Sleep001

    With you on the Green Goblin armour. I didn't like that, but Doc Ock worked and looked better than a tentacled teltubby with a bowlcut as he always seemed. And having organic web spinners was a better idea than the inventions, and the changes made to give spidey's suit a bit more substance worked to give it more than a spandex look.

  • June 23, 2006, 7:02 a.m. CST

    And it didn't really hurt switching the...

    by Mr_Sleep001

    Gwen Stacy and Mary Jane narrative chronologically

  • June 23, 2006, 7:04 a.m. CST


    by Blanket-Man

    I had no interest in seeing STUPORMAN, yet now I MUST! I MUST!!!! ALL HAIL THE GOD THAT IS SAM RAIMI!!!! And, Jarv, David Michelinie wrote those classic early Venom tales. I remember those comics so well: for the first time, I actually feared for Spidey's safety. Venom/Brock remains the only truly awesome Spidey villain who wasn't created by Lee/Ditko. Too bad Marvel overexposed Brock, watered him down and eventually ruined him throughout the 1990s...

  • June 23, 2006, 7:08 a.m. CST

    Rant Breath

    by Frijole

    Yes, the GG costume was unfortunate... but I think in the end that ANY GG costume was going to look pretty silly in live action. As for Octavius, he wasn't a "good guy"- he was a good man and a good scientist turned mad by his errr... accident. Exactly like in the comics. The only change was that SM2 killed him in the end (common practice in comic adaptations) and since he started as a good man, Raimi allowed him redemption before his death. As for Raimi having never read a comic... come ON! With the exception of Kevin Smith and David Goyer, he is probably the most comics savvy person in Hollywood. With the exception of two movies, the man's entire CAREER has been a comic book. ED/AofD has been adapted into several comics, Spider-Man is an adaptation OF a comic and The Quick and the Dead and Darkman have more comic book tone/devices/framings etc... than any 3 or 4 average comic adaptations COMBINED. Nitpick all you want, but Raimi's affection for the character is not in question.

  • June 23, 2006, 7:40 a.m. CST

    Don't bother with YOUTUBE

    by alienindisguise

    I just checked it out and the only trailers on there are fakes. I always thought the Sandman was a boring character and nothing more than Hydroman with sand in place of water. I think this flick will have more depth in the characters which I think the other 2 were missing. I'm hoping the symbiote causes Peter to backhand MJ a time or 2 to shut her up...that would be worth the price of admission!

  • June 23, 2006, 7:54 a.m. CST

    go ahead and roast me...

    by tompbeast

    but what's the deal with the black spiderman? please relieve my ignorance.

  • June 23, 2006, 7:57 a.m. CST

    Marketing Suggestion

    by Mad-Maximus

    I saw on the teaser description that the release is the 4th of May. That lands on a Friday. I'm in the marketing industry and I'm wondering why they didn't make the release the 3rd of May so it would coincide with the title. That would make it easier for the consumer to remember the release date. Plus they would get an extra day of revenue to add to the opening weekend box office take.

  • June 23, 2006, 8:01 a.m. CST

    Mori you wicked whore!

    by brycemonkey

    You took me to the edge of geekasm and then just flicked my nips! What...? Too far?

  • June 23, 2006, 8:02 a.m. CST

    OK normally I'd bitch about...

    by brycemonkey

    a 'description' of a trailer; but that sounds freaking cool!!!

  • June 23, 2006, 8:13 a.m. CST


    by connor187

    Can all you fuching nerds stop saying First at the begining of Talk Backs its fucking for Venom in Spidy 3 hell yeah!! I cant wait to see him on screen fighting Spiderman.

  • June 23, 2006, 8:16 a.m. CST

    Hmm, Harry becomes the Green Goblin?

    by Anna Valerious

    That would make up for Eric Forman.

  • June 23, 2006, 8:18 a.m. CST


    by zacdilone

    It's Capulets like you that make blood in the marketplace.

  • June 23, 2006, 8:27 a.m. CST

    Opening weekend

    by Blanket-Man

    "[By opening on a Thursday,] they would get an extra day of revenue to add to the opening weekend box office take." Yes, but opening on Thursday would pretty much destroy any hope of breaking Spidey I's Opening Weekend Record of $114.8 mil. Since 3 is opening on the same weekend as 1, I'd say it has a damned good shot at taking the title.

  • June 23, 2006, 8:27 a.m. CST

    Iron Man Release Date- May '08

    by Mad-Maximus

    Why am I talking about Iron Man in a Spiderman 3 TB? Just saw that Marvel has issued a statement that Iron Man is being released the first weekend of May in '08. Thats a stipulation if they can get financing. But if they do then thats 3 years in a row for Marvel to kick of the summer season.

  • June 23, 2006, 8:35 a.m. CST

    I second the notion...

    by Rant Breath

    ...that MJ should be bitch-slapped by symbiote-effected Parker. Or better yet beaten within an inch of her life. Just to see Kristin "my face looks like ass-crack" Dunst get beat to a bloody pulp would be awesome. Ugly dumb bitch. Mary Jane Watson my ass.

  • June 23, 2006, 8:40 a.m. CST

    That sounds good, I reckon

    by Grammaton Cleric

    For those of you that never got the chance to see the Spider-man 1 World Trade Center teaser: THAT got me excited way back when.

  • June 23, 2006, 8:46 a.m. CST

    ALL HAIL the Mighty RAIMI!!!

    by future help


  • June 23, 2006, 8:49 a.m. CST

    Yeah it's a shame that they had to cut it out...

    by brycemonkey

    it was cool.

  • June 23, 2006, 8:49 a.m. CST


    by Mad-Maximus

    I'll guarantee you that any movie studio executive really doesn't care if they break a weekend "record" by having to release it on a Friday. The bottom line is that big budget movies are produced to make money not to entertain. Yes I know it doesn't make sense but if a studio can rake in more revenue by releasing it early during the week then by all means they are going to do it. Look at X3, look at Superman Returns (still undecided at box office). WB saw how much money that X3 made by releasing it on a Wednesday so they moved SR up to the 28th. Talk to any Sony movie executive and I'll bet you anything they do not care about beating a weekend record (Fri-Sun) unless it brings in more revenue.

  • June 23, 2006, 8:49 a.m. CST


    by Doctor_Sin

    Oh hell, yes! The money shot sounds like the black spidey swinging by and it reflecting the red suit. Geekgasms commence!

  • June 23, 2006, 8:51 a.m. CST


    by Shermdawg

    Alcoholic in Hulk Hogan themed armor.....*yawn* Wake me up when you get news on Hulk 2 or the rumored, yet not as of yet shot down Speilberg helmed Captain America.

  • June 23, 2006, 8:53 a.m. CST

    "or the rumored, yet not as of yet shot down "

    by Shermdawg

    Yeah, after reading that, I really am going to bed. >_<

  • June 23, 2006, 8:56 a.m. CST

    This mofo has been fighting darkness since day one

    by Terry_1978

    It&#39;s all been one giant downer since SM1. Granted, some instances were fun, but this series has been pretty dark, even by Spidey standards.

  • June 23, 2006, 9:01 a.m. CST

    (sigh) Why are they doing multiple super villians???

    by Russman

    That&#39;s one (one of many) of the reasons why the Batman franchise fell apart. Oh well, it&#39;s to late now. I&#39;m just gonna cross my fingers and put my faith in Rami.

  • June 23, 2006, 9:03 a.m. CST

    Mad Max Re: Box office stuff

    by Blanket-Man

    Yes, I&#39;ll grant ya that SONY&#39;s looking at the bottom line above all else. But studios do like to trumpet records, too, if one&#39;s there for the taking. SR is opening in late June, when all the kiddies are out of school, so a Wednesday opening makes sense. X3 opened on Friday, May 26th, BTW, which led to its monster weekend...

  • June 23, 2006, 9:04 a.m. CST

    I hope they have this trailer in IMAX


    As that is how I am going to be exposed to Supes Return.

  • June 23, 2006, 9:07 a.m. CST


    by Mad-Maximus

    Yeah your right, I made a mistake about X3&#39;s release date but personally I would release it on the 3rd of May.

  • June 23, 2006, 9:07 a.m. CST


    by moviemaniac-7

    But I rather see it for real...

  • June 23, 2006, 9:20 a.m. CST


    by Mr_Sleep001

    I doubt they&#39;ll have all three feature heavily in number 3. Remember he&#39;s shooting 3&4 back to back and as Sandman&#39;s pic was released first, I&#39;m guessing it&#39;s Sandman and GG for the most part with the black suit passing on to Brock towards the end of the film

  • June 23, 2006, 9:24 a.m. CST

    The "silver words" described in this are brilliant...

    by skycrapper

    Because it applies to all the central characters. Think about it. The four central characters (Parker, Osborn, Brock, and Sandman and maybe Dr. Conners) will all have to fight the darkness within themselves. I sense a theme here.

  • June 23, 2006, 9:37 a.m. CST

    "shooting 3&4 back to back"?-Mr_Sleep001

    by Mad-Maximus

    Where did you find out he is shooting 3 and 4 back-to-back? I keep updated on this stuff daily and haven&#39;t heard one peep of producing two movies just the second sequel. Please show me a link.

  • June 23, 2006, 9:37 a.m. CST

    Jayjew, I have to call you out...

    by Blacket-Man

    Superman will be the next Titantic. Fanboys will nash their teeth, woman will swoon and Joe Bad O&#39;Donut movie goer will dig a pretty neat movie. All in all it is going to rake in much money over a long very sustained period of time.

  • June 23, 2006, 9:50 a.m. CST


    by Burgundy82

    Look how many villains Batman Begins had...

  • June 23, 2006, 9:53 a.m. CST


    by Mr_Sleep001

    I might be mistaken, but I&#39;m sure it was reported in the early stages of development. It might have been a debunked rumour, but I&#39;m pretty sure that&#39;s what&#39;s happening. It&#39;d make sense with all the characters this thing is loaded with

  • June 23, 2006, 9:59 a.m. CST

    Hey Shermdawg

    by Turd Furgusen

    I have to disagree with your statement in the SR TB that "MELTING OWL would beat the shit out of DUNBAR HORTON." I think that Brandon would beat the piss out of Tom. I think Brandon is heavier and has a longer reach. Oh, yeah this sounds like a sweet teaser. Can&#39;t wait to see it.

  • June 23, 2006, 10:15 a.m. CST


    by Blanket-Man

    Hey, that guy&#39;s an imposter! And a deluded one, at that! Ain&#39;t no way SUPERMAN approaches TITANIC numbers. Or SPIDER-MAN numbers, for that matter. And the "filming SPIDEY 3 and 4 at the same time" rumor has never been confirmed, and that talk has pretty much died down during the shoot itself.

  • June 23, 2006, 10:16 a.m. CST

    Raimi Goal for 3 Better be: Scare the hell out of kids

    by stlfilmwire

    Go Evil Dead crazy on those suckers. Take the craziness from the Doc Ock hospital moment and amp it by ten. Raimi is swell.

  • June 23, 2006, 10:26 a.m. CST

    Yeah, sorry about that Blanket-man

    by Blacket-Man

    However when Quint (or was that Herc?) screwed up your handle I just had to call my self Blacket-man. Too funny. And you are certainly free to think I am on drugs for thinking Titantic numbers, but I just see all the right ingredients. Do not be surprised when it happens.

  • June 23, 2006, 10:30 a.m. CST

    Terry_1978 is correct

    by AlwaysThere

    The thing that&#39;s kept me from enjoying this Spider-man movies is the non-stop infighting the guy has been through. Where&#39;s the fun, wisecracking Spider-man? I dont want him sulking for 2 more hours. Accept been Spider-man already.

  • June 23, 2006, 10:49 a.m. CST

    There are two opposing Blanket-Men?!

    by brycemonkey

    For real or is it just one conflicted TBer? Damn, we need Homewreker to tell us if its a muti-user name consipracy or Doc. Paz. Come back, all is forgiven! Oh the irony...

  • June 23, 2006, 11:05 a.m. CST


    by finky089

    Agreed with your comment about Venom being a much better "villain" before he got watered down throughout the 90&#39;s. I wish the one it sounds like Raimi&#39;s giving us was the original Eddie Brock/Venom, but alas it doesn&#39;t look that way. And if there&#39;s no big white spider on the suit, it will just seem like a cop-out and ruin the watered-down Venom for me even more. But, I kinda-sorta got over robo-Goblin from SM1, so maybe, in time, I can get over a blueish-black spidey suit posing as the Venom "suit". Only time will tell.

  • June 23, 2006, 11:08 a.m. CST

    Lotsa Spider-Man movie fans here....

    by Doom II

    I am a Spider-FREAK, but think the movies missed the mark in general. Oh well. I don&#39;t hate them, but really find them good for only 1 viewing due to the extreme amount of angst and drama and lack of excitement. I think Superman (a character I like, but never followed) will have more to offer. Plus. I hate Venom. Hate the whole "Venom Saga". Oh well.

  • June 23, 2006, 11:09 a.m. CST

    That 70&#39;s Venom

    by Cumlauncher

    Smoke surrounds basement(Camera starts on Tobey)TOBEY: Guys, guys, You ever get those sticky hands out of the gumball machines and you can like snap them forward and grab stuff and (makes overt yanking gesture) and yank it back? I can do that!...But with a Volvo! HAHAH! (Camera whips around to MJ) MJ: Peter..why do I call you tiger? You&#39;re not like fierce..I mean a tiger has stripes. You have web thingy shapes on your costume. It doesn&#39;t even match the color scheme man. Until you start wearing black and orange, I&#39;m gonna call you "Web Thingy". (Camera whips around to Aunt May whose ankles are sticking straight up into frame) AUNT MAY: Oh my..Peter? Your Uncle Ben always said that with great power...Did you ever notice how when you stare at the ceiling fan long enough, that it looks like it&#39;s going both ways at once? That&#39;s just amazing to me. (Camera whips around to Topher Grace with Venom mask on) RahhhhhH! This guy&#39;s tongue is so long and it&#39;s always out...Why is Venom&#39;s tongue always out? Did he just score 3 points I mean.. (Topher rips mask off and whispers to camera) Hey..don&#39;t tell anyone..but I caught Michael Douglas doing blow of Zeta Jones&#39; ass on the set of Traffic! Ok I need Funions. Give Venom Funions! Raaahhh!

  • June 23, 2006, 11:10 a.m. CST

    Haven&#39;t been this excited to see a movie since ROTK!!!

    by BilboRing

    Superman Returns looks just amazing and the early reviews are stellar. And now that I get to see a trailer for Spidey 3.......MAN I WANT TO SEE THIS FUCKER NOW!!!!!!!! Raime is a god and I have complete faith in him. He has not let us down yet. True, Spidey could lighten up a bit. But other than that, perfection!!!!

  • June 23, 2006, 11:10 a.m. CST


    by quadrupletree

    I&#39;ll believe it when I see it.

  • June 23, 2006, 11:14 a.m. CST

    Cumlauncher: lol

    by brycemonkey

    Props dude...

  • June 23, 2006, 11:14 a.m. CST

    And, FINALLY, no more face-fucking Harry!

    by finky089


  • June 23, 2006, 11:22 a.m. CST has the trailer!!!!!!!!!!

    by digital8

    the trailer full of kraft cheese!

  • June 23, 2006, 11:27 a.m. CST

    Spider-Man 3: A Lesson To Us All.....

    by 69DUDE

    Considering how many men MJ has been through in 2 flicks (Flash, Harry, John J, Peter), is it any wonder Pete&#39;s caught the &#39;black goo&#39;? Raimi is clearly making an STI educational film in disguise.....

  • June 23, 2006, 11:27 a.m. CST


    by supermonkey

    Way to find a way to dog on Superman..(AGAIN) in a TB that was actually talking about Spider-Man. When Supes makes ass loads of cash, bones yer girlfriend and then has her make him a sandwich, I&#39;m sure you&#39;ll still be talking smack, but hey, ya know, good luck with that. The Spidey trailer sounds pretty dope. I can&#39;t wait to see it.

  • June 23, 2006, 11:31 a.m. CST

    In other news..

    by Cumlauncher

    Do NOT mess with the "S", Spidey fans. Fuck Zod, and KNEEL before The Last Son Of Krypton you webheads. Like many TB&#39;ers have said we&#39;re looking at a film of "TITANIC" magnitude.

  • June 23, 2006, 11:31 a.m. CST

    How are they gonna jam ...

    by squidman

    Sandman&#39;s story, Venom&#39;s story, Gwenn Stacy&#39;s story, and Harry Osbourne&#39;s story all into one freakin&#39; movie? And now there&#39;s talk of The Lizard, too? I&#39;m sorry, but that&#39;s too much. Unless the story is 5 hours long, and I can&#39;t stand crying babies, cel phones going off and text "beeping" for that fucking long. Some moviegoers are assholes.

  • June 23, 2006, 11:38 a.m. CST

    Geek boner rising.......

    by vinceklortho

    sorry, but now I&#39;m more excited to see this than Supes Returns. But, once I satisfy my geek needs, I can sit back and watch(what I hear) is a pretty kick ass comic book movie in Superman. So, I&#39;ll be content when that time comes. Also, if this is a true telling of the teaser, why isn&#39;t there a shot of Eddie in this? I&#39;m thinking now that he just might be a minor foil to Peter Parker the whole time, while he&#39;s dealing with the black suit and Sandy and Harry/Goblin. Then, obviously, Eddie will get a hold of the symbiote...but, what I really want to see is him actually as Venom and then Venom bites Sandman...kinda like the comics. However, are we actually going to see Venom at all? It&#39;s really interesting that they are not going to show Topher at all, yet the only news when they announced the two villans was that he was going to be a essential part of it. Maybe cause this is just a teaser and they will get more into the intense bits with a full trailer later. Like add in Gwen Stacey and Topher and show Thomas Hayden as Flint. whatever, I&#39;m psyched. I was worried about the black goo thing, but it looks like they are going through with it. Can&#39;t wait to see the shot of black spidey perched in the rain. Sweet!

  • June 23, 2006, 11:40 a.m. CST

    "Spiderman and the Black-Goo Bukkake"

    by Doctor_Sin

    As others have posited, why the hell so many villains and sub-plots? What is this, Shakespeare all of a sudden?

  • June 23, 2006, 11:41 a.m. CST

    69DUDE, that shit was LOL funny.

    by R.C. the "Wise"

    That&#39;s the problem with Mary Jane, she&#39;s everybody&#39;s hoe. Hit it twice then pass it to the next homie!

  • June 23, 2006, 11:50 a.m. CST

    SPIDEY 3 teaser intrigues more than Superman Returns!

    by KAWS

    Why am I NOT surprised. This teaser trailer alone is worth my my 9 bucks. But I&#39;m still downloading Superman instead, and wait for Spidey 3&#39;s teaser to be released online. This teaser trailer actually sounds more intriguing, than anything I&#39;ve heard of in the entire Superman Requel (as Moriarty calls it) movie or have seen in the TV Spots/trailers. Supes sounds like another King Kong film, long, boring and overhyped by Harry. You know this to be true.

  • June 23, 2006, 11:54 a.m. CST

    So no venom?

    by Mooly

    Sound to me like this movie will be more of a venom set-up than actually having him as an enemy. Frankly, I love that idea and I&#39;m glad to see Raimi is still on the ball with these movies and not just rushing crap out to please the studio. I&#39;d rather a Venom story line be treatedt properly, with all the character development, that just tossing him in "Bane" style.

  • June 23, 2006, 12:14 p.m. CST

    But can it beat Cameron&#39;s Aquaman at the Box Office?

    by Darth_Potter

    Either way, I&#39;m paying $8.50 to see Bryce Dallas Howard as a blonde for 2+ hours.

  • June 23, 2006, 12:21 p.m. CST

    batman sucked from multi-villians?

    by deadpool51

    Im sick of hearing how the Batman franchise was killed cause of the use of multiple villians. COME ON!!! you mean it wasnt the neon batmobile, or the neon goons with neon tommy guns, or the nipple batsuit? Or maybe it was a shitty ass script with shitty ass direction. Multiply villians does not ruin a movie, bad use of them does.

  • June 23, 2006, 12:24 p.m. CST

    to Mooly&#39;s post...

    by deadpool51

    The film makers have already confired Venom will only be in the Final 10 minutes of the movie.

  • June 23, 2006, 12:29 p.m. CST

    Last ten minutes in this film....

    by Doctor_Sin

    maybe 90+ more in the next??? Venomous goodness!

  • June 23, 2006, 12:36 p.m. CST

    number 4...?

    by deadpool51

    im skeptical there will be a number 4, I dont believe the actors are signed up for a 4th movie. I know Kirsten already said she wanted out. Which is why i think they are gonna do a twist on the comics and kill off MJ instead of Gwen. They already said SPidey loses someone very close to him, and Aunt mey woudl be to obviose of a person to kill off. But they again, why cast "whats his name" as brock if they were just gonna have venom for only the last 10min of the movie and not make a number 4 to finish off the franchise with one huge ass battle between Spidey and Venom. Who better do do the bad blackey on the silver screen the the Evil Dead man himself.

  • June 23, 2006, 12:37 p.m. CST

    The movie black suit vs. comics black suit

    by Petro45

    All of you complaining that the black suit in the movies is different from the comics, explain this to me: If a blob of black goo sticks to Peter Parker&#39;s skin, and then forms a new, totally different costume around him, would he say "cool, I have a new costume," or "holy shit, get this shit off me, something fucked up is going on!" In the comics they could get away with the venom-suit because they had the whole "I thought it came from an alien costume-making machine" angle, but its not like they can duplicate that in the movie. You complain about the slightest deviation from the comics, but the storyline you&#39;re hoping for would require Peter Parker to be an idiotic fucktard - I think that would qualify as more of a "deviation" than the spider on his suit not being white. Here&#39;s how its going to play out - the black goo attaches to Peter&#39;s suit, not his skin. It only changes the color of the suit, it does not redesign the suit. Peter goes along with it because he thinks that some substance merely changed the color of his suit, and that its no big deal. However, when VENOM, comes into existence, the suit will attach itself to Eddie Brock&#39;s skin. Then you&#39;ll get the white spider, slithering suit, everything you&#39;re hoping for. And it will make a helluva lot more sense in the context of the story.

  • June 23, 2006, 12:50 p.m. CST

    Petros45 is 100% correct....

    by deadpool51

    First off , in the comic, didnt the black suit first attach to spiderman over his original suit? if so, then the movie wouldnt be deviating. Second They already confirmed in an interview with either Avi or one of the other producers that Venom will have the White spider. Thats how the "non comic book" movie goers will be able to tell the big difference between the black spidey and Venom

  • June 23, 2006, 1:37 p.m. CST

    DeadPool51 is 100% correct

    by BilboRing

    More than one villain did not kill Batman. The fact that they just plain sucked is what killed them. Other than Batman Begins, every Batman movie ever released has just been a big pile of shit. Shitty acting, plots, directing, costumes, etc. They were just gay jit.

  • June 23, 2006, 1:40 p.m. CST


    by moto

    Let me confirm this right now. They are NOT shooting Spidey 3 and 4 back-to-back. I work at Sony and know this for sure. Secondly, anyone who thinks that Superman will be overshadowed by Spider-Man is just crazy. Superman is an American Icon. This Superman flick will overshadow Spider-man completely based just off of that factor alone. Personally, the only good Spider-Man moments were the first forty minutes or so of the first film. Spider-Man has been a filler for audiences while Superman gestated over the years. Well, he&#39;s finally back and in capable hands with Singer. The Spider-Man movies have been soooo frickin&#39; overrated. And when it rakes in the cash, blows Spider-Man out of the water, AICN fanboys will ofcourse rip it to shreds, despite the outstanding success and critical praise that will come along with this release. When audiences hear that Superman music that they&#39;ve remembered throughout their lives since the late 70s, it will send chills down their spine. Superman Returns is going to be the event of the summer. Pirates will be great, but the debut of a new Superman Franchise is a pop culture event. Even if the movie is somewhat good and not perfectly excellent, it will be a smashing success. So pack away your webslingers and pull out the true owner of the blue and red. Superman came first almost 60 years ago. There would be no Spider-Man without Supes. Stan Lee even says it. Spider-Man 3 will have its day... but there&#39;s a better hero in town.

  • June 23, 2006, 1:45 p.m. CST

    Spidey 4....

    by vinceklortho

    I&#39;m going with deadpool on this one as well. There has been hardly any talk of Spidey 4 cause of the actors wanting to jump ship...we all know that they only signed on for two sequels when the first one came out. However, I really hope that they do leave it massively open ended and not do a battle royale of sorts with tons of villans. We got conflict with Harry, conflict with Sandy...just mix those two in and throw in black suit with Gwen and MJ love triangle. Good enough...have Brock in the background messing around and suddenly showing up..pissed as fuck at then end of the movie. Remember those shots of Spidey swinging and everybody cheering? Let&#39;s say that is the end when Spidey confronts his demons, kicks ass and everything is back to normal...Then all of a sudden, this bastard takes over...Venom. End the movie there.

  • June 23, 2006, 1:46 p.m. CST


    by RobinP

    Gee, now THERE&#39;s a couple of seconds off my life that I&#39;ll never get back and I&#39;ll regret wasting when I&#39;m on my deathbed.

  • June 23, 2006, 1:53 p.m. CST

    All this hype isn&#39;t good

    by FordPerfect

    Im not getting excitied till I see some live action footage. Then I can make a call. We were all happy as shit when we saw the Punisher Teaser, and that movie was disappointing.

  • June 23, 2006, 2:03 p.m. CST

    trailer descriptions

    by BitterMan23

    are the equivalent of using a close captioning track to judge a musical.

  • June 23, 2006, 2:06 p.m. CST


    by deadpool51

    First off let me start by saying i am no way bashing the superman movie and i am super excited to see it, haveing friends and co workers that have worked on it, BUT......You have to be retarded to think that Pirates of the caribean isnt goin to over take superman in the box office. (thats why it got moved to the 28th, to get a few days more jump away from pirates&#39;s realease date, they even said it) Yes tons and tons of peeple are gonna see superman. But are tons of people gonna go back and see it 5 times like girls are goin to go back to see Bloom and Depp? I think not. Also spidey 3 is on track to being the biggest Budget Film of all time. They arent throwing there money away knowing they arent getting it back on this one (especially with the spidey franchise being the only thing thats keeping sony alive) Superman is gonna be big and huge, but its goin to be over taken by the pirate sequals and spider 3 hands down. Oh and you say Superman is an america Icon? well so is Batty and spiderman. Go ask any person on the street to name off some super heroes and I bet a 100% of the time they will say, superman, batman, and spiderman together and not in that order. all three are houshold names and are big as each other.

  • June 23, 2006, 2:08 p.m. CST

    Thanks, Moto!

    by Petro45

    I haven&#39;t heard a "my superhero is cooler than your superhero" argument like that since third grade - man, that takes me back. While you&#39;re at it, could you tell me your position on Transformers v. G.I. Joe?

  • June 23, 2006, 2:26 p.m. CST

    by SaluteYourShorts

    Where will they say the black suit has come from?

  • June 23, 2006, 2:28 p.m. CST

    Relax Moto-Fucker

    by BilboRing

    They ARE just movies afterall. It is not like anyone is curing cancer or anything important here. Superman, Batman, Spider-Man. Who cares? They all rock and all deserve to be on top.

  • June 23, 2006, 2:30 p.m. CST

    The series continues...

    by SaluteYourShorts

    The third movie will have sandman, venom rising, and new Goblin...Venom should take full force in the fourth one -- he deserves an "epic-like" story line. he should spawn "Carnage" in the fourth one as well, leading up to the fifth film, where all hell absolutely breaks loose. Also in the fourth film lizard should come about, just to cause more havoc and fuel the fire!

  • June 23, 2006, 2:32 p.m. CST

    And then the final film...

    by SaluteYourShorts

    The final film should simply be a remake of the first, except using on members of the short-lived FOX series "Ask Harriet"

  • June 23, 2006, 2:33 p.m. CST

    Has anyone yelled &#39;PLANT&#39; or &#39;FAKE&#39; yet?

    by Doctor_Sin

    &#39;Cos this TB feels lacking somehow

  • June 23, 2006, 2:37 p.m. CST


    by deadpool51

    Dotn expect to se carnage on the big screen ever, there will not be 5 spidey movies, we will be lucky if there is a 4 to showcase Venom to his fullest.

  • June 23, 2006, 2:37 p.m. CST

    anyone else kinda dissapointed in the descrption?

    by hotsoup99


  • June 23, 2006, 2:39 p.m. CST

    Doctor_Sin is a Plant

    by SaluteYourShorts

    He is a plant, clearly put here by the studio to throw us off, as a result of Mr. Maguire and Mr. Grace&#39;s unhappiness with their &#39;Brokeback Mountain&#39;esque love scene in the film. That&#39;s how Brock aquires the Black Suit from spidey - it&#39;s in his sperm. You all know what sperm is, right? I know, I know...I find this all very unsettling too, but unfortunately it&#39;s true. Oh, and that new Paris Hilton song is going to be the only music in the film. I dunno, I think it&#39;s kinda hot.

  • June 23, 2006, 2:40 p.m. CST


    by SaluteYourShorts

    You are a pessimist. Saying this is the last Spidey film is like saying Kevin McCallister won&#39;t be back for one more go-round with the Wet Bandits.

  • June 23, 2006, 2:43 p.m. CST

    Videoman is the baddie in Spidey 6!

    by durhay

  • June 23, 2006, 2:47 p.m. CST

    So, Mori was right too...

    by vinceklortho

    Zack Synder is confirmed to direct "Watchmen".

  • June 23, 2006, 2:53 p.m. CST

    Multiple villains...

    by Azlam Orlandu

    Just because the Bat-Franchise failed to do it right years ago doesn&#39;t mean that Spidey will fail. Comparing Spider-Man with those films is inane. Besides those of you who keep bringing up that point sound like a broken record. Yeah...never heard that one before. If you don&#39;t have anything new to add then why contribute?

  • June 23, 2006, 2:57 p.m. CST

    WTF Indeed

    by Dr. Opticus

    Show us the trailer! I like reading as much as the next guy if I wanted to read, I&#39;d head for the can and whip out the Maxim!

  • June 23, 2006, 3:12 p.m. CST

    Superman is your father&#39;s superhero...

    by Blanket-Man

    SR may rule this summer, but I wouldn&#39;t even bet the farm on that. I just don&#39;t see it coming close to $400 mil domestic B.O. We&#39;re still working on the first series of Spidey movies -- people had been waiting since the 1960s. We&#39;ve already seen several good, maybe great, SUPERMAN flicks. I just don&#39;t think the anticipation is there. I think it&#39;ll be closer to BATMAN BEGINS numbers than SPIDER-MAN. SUPERMAN is an icon, and I respect his stature as the world&#39;s first super-hero. But ya know what? KING KONG&#39;s an icon, too, and fans were confidently predicting that flick would pass $400 mil not too long ago. We&#39;ll see what happens next week...

  • June 23, 2006, 3:15 p.m. CST

    Does Spiderman 3 = Superman 3?

    by workshed

    Sound very similar in tone.

  • June 23, 2006, 3:15 p.m. CST

    About Spidey 4 and beyond...

    by andrew coleman

    I thought I read back when Howard was casted that she was signed on the 3 films which would if I can count right 3, 4, and a fifth film. Dunst said she is done after three but Tobey&#39;s tone has changed since then where I thought in an interview he claimed he&#39;d be up for more. This just makes me think MJ is either going to be killed by Harry or she leaves town to LA because she can&#39;t handle it all, especiallu Brock following her around.

  • June 23, 2006, 3:25 p.m. CST

    The bad version of the hero.......

    by godhatesyou

    Nuclear Spiderman!

  • June 23, 2006, 3:25 p.m. CST

    My balls swell with anticipation!!

    by BilboRing

    Funny how a Superman movie is generating so much hype for a Spider-Man fim!!! I can&#39;t wait for both to rock my world. After X3, I need a boost in confidence with comic book movies!

  • June 23, 2006, 3:51 p.m. CST

    Spidey 3 Filming A Block From My House

    by CaptDanielRoe

    They have flyers up all over saying they are gonna tow cars if they are parked around, but... Refreshingly... Boldly announcing it&#39;s Spider-Man 3. I may have to take my three-year-old to get a look at Spider-Man on his very own Main Street (Kew Gardens, Queens.) Well I don&#39;t know that, ahem, Man In Suit will be there. We&#39;ll see.

  • June 23, 2006, 3:54 p.m. CST

    Fuck off Rami...

    by godhatesyou

    You have become a fanboys bowed to the fanboys by putting Venom in and now you will feel their wrath when they hate him. Good luck Rami......Good luck. Superman rules!

  • June 23, 2006, 4:03 p.m. CST

    imax showing...

    by deadpool51

    anyone know if they will have the spidey trailer in front of the imax version of superman?

  • June 23, 2006, 4:05 p.m. CST

    Gwen Stacy And Venom In The Same Movie

    by CaptDanielRoe

    That&#39;s like having Krypto humping Doomsday&#39;s leg while he&#39;s stomping Supes. Well, not exactly like that. But kinda.

  • June 23, 2006, 4:12 p.m. CST


    by deadpool51

    Gwen is obviosly in this one to get MJ out of the picture since she wants off the franchise and make it easier to make a number 4 if they do

  • June 23, 2006, 4:19 p.m. CST


    by moto

    I just don&#39;t like Spider-Man. Many people don&#39;t. The movies that is. Bad CGI. Tobey Maguire&#39;s line delivery is just annoying now. He&#39;s terrible with the Spider-Man wisecracks, which are the center of the character in many respects. I&#39;m not a Superman freak or anything and yes, I know Spider-Man and Batman are icons as well, but nowhere near Superman. The guys been around for six decades people. He was a merchandising phenom. Just check out the LOOK, UP IN THE SKY doc to see how far back and how wide he stretches. You&#39;re crazy to think that Spider-Man and Batman even come close. You have to look past your generation, and look backwards. I don&#39;t fault anyone for liking Spider-Man movies. To each his own. I just think that Superman is something different and will reach a wider audience than Spider-Man. Yeah, who cares in the long run. They ARE just movies. But hey, it&#39;s a discussion....

  • June 23, 2006, 4:21 p.m. CST

    As far as Transformers and G.I. Joe?

    by moto

    They exist on an equal plain in my book. Now Go-Bots suck!

  • June 23, 2006, 4:24 p.m. CST

    I Know It Deadpool But...

    by CaptDanielRoe

    ...Captain Jeanne DeWolfe would be so much more interesting, and not, in some sense, recasting Gwen since MJ took Gwen&#39;s signature scene (and chrnological love interest place) already.

  • June 23, 2006, 4:37 p.m. CST

    true, capt...

    by deadpool51

    but i just think Gwen is alittle more known between non spidey peeps

  • June 23, 2006, 4:44 p.m. CST

    Mary Jane VS Gwen

    by andenu

    yeah they used a lot of gwen stacy&#39;s shtick on MJ. on the other hand, peter parker WAS with mary jane before gwen in the comic book. it&#39;s true.

  • June 23, 2006, 4:45 p.m. CST

    Spidey 3 on Supes IMAX...

    by Bert Fischer

    No trailer for "Spiderman" on IMAX "Superman". Only on 35mm. New "Ant Bully" in 3D trailer before "Superman" IMAX.

  • June 23, 2006, 4:47 p.m. CST


    by deadpool51

    its funny how everyone debunks the way Raime is telling the story but when you look deeper into the comics you find out he is actually telling it somewhat correct.

  • June 23, 2006, 4:52 p.m. CST

    are you seriose Bert?

    by deadpool51

    man that sucks i already got my tickets to the imax one, all i care to see is the spidey trailer on teh big screen

  • June 23, 2006, 4:54 p.m. CST

    thats what it is olorin...

    by deadpool51

    they already said Venom doesnt appear until the last 10min of the movie.

  • June 23, 2006, 4:56 p.m. CST

    Venom is a terrible villan.

    by godhatesyou

    A sad way to end the series.......the third movie for filmwatchers is always the worst sadly.....but for directors the third always the best payed. The greedy bastard.

  • June 23, 2006, 5:02 p.m. CST

    No one sems worried about Venom F/X

    by Doom II

    Let&#39;s be honest, some special effects from Spider-Man 1 and 2 were REALLY bad (roof jumping Parker, rubbery CGI character fight sequences). I don&#39;t have a lot of faith that Venom will look very good to begin with. Full CGI characters rarely work (Gollum and Kong are the 2 exceptions). Superman is going to create a massive shockwave throughout the world this summer. Pirates and Superman are the money makers this year. I am more excited by the Punisher sequel than Spider 3. Not trying to start shit or anything but I think Punisher 2 will get it all right. Ghostrider around the corner. Man, superhero heaven.

  • June 23, 2006, 5:17 p.m. CST

    It&#39;s True!

    by finky089

    Go-Bots do suck.

  • June 23, 2006, 5:21 p.m. CST

    Superman will destroy Spiderman.

    by godhatesyou

    Nobody understands the impact Superman is going to have. More people like Superman than any superhero ever made in the world ever. It will destroy Spidermans records easily.

  • June 23, 2006, 5:23 p.m. CST

    no olorin...

    by deadpool51

    if you would read other article besides talk back stuff you would have read the interview with Avi and then you would have read him saying that venom will make his appearence in the last 10 min of the film.

  • June 23, 2006, 5:25 p.m. CST

    Spidey 4

    by alienindisguise

    If there is a 4 and Kirsten Dunst bails, good riddance! She&#39;s always sucked as an "actress" and was never hot enough to be MJ in the first place. I personally hope the 3rd film is the last because if it keeps going, then the really cheesy villains would be sure to show up. Vulture, Electro, Rhino...yikes!

  • June 23, 2006, 5:25 p.m. CST

    oh yeah godhatesyou...

    by deadpool51

    so Return of the King was the worst cause it was the third film?

  • June 23, 2006, 5:33 p.m. CST

    is that right DoomII....

    by deadpool51

    so you work in post production i guess? cause i do, and we worked on spiderman 2. So you will realize that what makes effects good is MONEY and TIME. Gollum was perfect in two towers cause they started working on him years before that film came out, and got tons of money to put into him for the second film, (hence why u only see his face in the first one, which is a different Gollum model, and why most of the other effects were horrid.) Davey jones in pirates two they have been working on for over 2 years, Just on his character. Spidey 3 they have two characters ( sandman and the venom symbiot) that will have similiar fluid and particle like effects. There budget is enormous (biggest in history) which will buy them the time and people needed to make them photo real. They did not have that on the first spiderman.

  • June 23, 2006, 5:36 p.m. CST

    Return of the king was based on a book..

    by godhatesyou

    Are we comparing Spiderman 1 and 2 too the Lord of the Rings and the Two Towers? All four movies were overhyped..And Return of the King was the worst because it missed out all the stuff of the became a comic book movie....the Gollum show.

  • June 23, 2006, 5:44 p.m. CST


    by deadpool51

    your saying it sucked cause it wasnt like the book? Everything doesnt convert from paper to Film, its almost impossible to do. I&#39;m sick of people compairing movies to books, they are different, get over it. not to mention someone doesnt want to devote 10 years of there life to making a copy of something. they want to add there own taste to it. Thats the whoel point.

  • June 23, 2006, 5:47 p.m. CST

    bad CGI?

    by vinceklortho

    I&#39;m no expert, but I thought Spidey 2 had terrific fx. I mean, seriously, they were not bad. The fight with Doc Ock and Aunt May on the building was fantastic. Not to mention great flow between real life actor and cgi animation. First one had decent fx too....not trying to start a weird comic book fight, but I thought Spidey 2 had some of the best fx that year.

  • June 23, 2006, 5:49 p.m. CST

    Everyone thought fellowship of the ring was the worst..

    by wolack22

    but it followed the book the closest in my opinion... one part that really irked me was frodo&#39;s almost death by shelob. In the book it was far more dramatic... you really did think frodo was dead, and it went into sam&#39;s mindset about where he thought he might be going with the ring, and how shaken he was by going on without frodo. Plus, we didn&#39;t get the iconic moment where sam&#39;s anger boils over when gollum grabs sam and forces him to watch frodo getting attacked by shelob. Damn just to get that one scene in, that&#39;s all i cared about.

  • June 23, 2006, 5:50 p.m. CST

    Go-Bots were Transformers for poor kids...

    by moto

    hee hee

  • June 23, 2006, 5:55 p.m. CST

    i agree with you vince...

    by deadpool51

    Spidey 2 did a great job on doc ocks tenticles. The fight scene on the clock tower with spidey and Aunt May was one of our compositing sequences. some of the scene were alittle Cg looking but thats what you get, you cant put all your money and time into every sequeance to make it perfect. so you put it into the really big scenes or the close ups and the rest you have to let go ( hence some of the crappy hobbit composite scenes in LOTR) Those shots get the stamp, what we call , CBB. which stands for Could Be Better ( but we dont have the time and money to make it perfect )

  • June 23, 2006, 5:56 p.m. CST

    Concerns about the Symbiote&#39;s origin

    by J Jonah_Jameson

    All they have to do is adapt what the 90&#39;s cartoon did to introduce it. It&#39;s as simple as that. With the introduction of John Jameson I think that is a good chance of that being the case. The convoluted Secret Wars origin is not what&#39;s important. It&#39;s that the symbiote is a shape shifting alien parasite. That&#39;s what really matters. I&#39;m not saying visuals isn&#39;t important. This is a movie after all. Of course it is! And what I see now from the black costume is not all that thrilling. The alien black costume was awesome and the only one that can compare to the red and blues and it&#39;s sad that Spider-man will never be seen wearing it. Also. Come on. They changed it because they didn&#39;t want people to confuse Spider-man with Venom? Are people not fammiliar with the comic really going to be bothered with that? I think it was an easy concept to follow seeing as it wasn&#39;t changed in a saturday morning cartoon for kids. You know what concepts don&#39;t work? Organic spinnerettes. Let&#39;s look at the reason apologists give for having Peter never making the mechanical web shooters. Number one. More realisitic (whatever the hell that means in a comic book adaptation). Having spinnerettes develop in your hands where they dont show up in Spiders is not realistic anyway. Oh but they do these things to help people not fammiliar with the character understand it more you say? Let me tell you after I watched the Spider-man movie everyone I was with that wasn&#39;t fammiliar with Spidey kept asking why he had to put his fingers in that funny position to shoot the webs. How do you explain that? It makes no sense because he does that to launch mechanical shooters so they go off when he makes a fist. So in essence what they tried to do had the opposite effect and was even more ridiculous. Plus it dumbs down the powers and abbilites of the symbiote the same as Doc Ocks sentient arms. I&#39;ll be even more fair and pretend i don&#39;t read comics and say i&#39;d take almost any concept for the Green Goblin&#39;s costume so long as it looks good. But whoever designed it must of been blind. I mean add some purple to it or something. Sheesh. I certainly hope that what we are hearing about is the actual costume covered with the symbiote. But it probably unlikely.

  • June 23, 2006, 5:57 p.m. CST

    Stop whining IMAX&#39;ers!

    by Cumlauncher

    Ok stop complaining about there being no Spidey 3 teaser with Superman if you ALREADY had your tickets. Oh man, I&#39;ve had my tickets for weeks! Seeing Spidey 3 teaser on IMAX is all I cared about." WRONG SIR! WRONG! You&#39;ve had your tickets for weeks because you are humbled before The House Of El. You never knew Spidey3 would have a teaser attached until a few hours ago. Or maybe you had an inkling it would because they are both massive superhero movies. Well fuck your inkling! And stop rocking and moaning.

  • June 23, 2006, 6:01 p.m. CST


    by J Jonah_Jameson

    I meant to say doesn&#39;t go off when he makes a fist.

  • June 23, 2006, 6:02 p.m. CST

    Spidey 3 is going to be so depressing...

    by wolack22

    As if spidey 2 wasn&#39;t depressing enough with PP&#39;s money troubles, losing jobs, his aunt mae financial troubles, his uncle, and problems with mary jane. This time around we have Sandman&#39;s ailing mother, more financial troubles with spidey and aunt mae, a black-suit that is crumbling spidey&#39;s morality, mary-jane&#39;s death, eddie&#39;s inability to measure up to any form of success and sadness, ........ oh god im going to cry... damn comic book and it&#39;s sadness... oh ya and gobots ruled, i had those. So what if my parents couldn&#39;t afford transformers when I was little, and all the other kids made fun of me .. and i wore the same clothes day in and out... ohhh self pity im going to cry again.

  • June 23, 2006, 6:06 p.m. CST

    cumlauncher your an idiot....

    by deadpool51

    tickets just went on sale for superman here on wensday, i knew the spidey trailer would be on superman weeks ago. The only reason im goin to see superman is to see the spidey trailer and support my friend who worked on superman. I can careless to see some no name guy try to copy Mr. Reeves.

  • June 23, 2006, 6:11 p.m. CST

    Is there any chance...

    by zacdilone

    ...that the black costume is going to be some sort of CGI effect, and all of the shots of Toby in the boring black variation of the red and blue outfit are just to throw us (and piss us) off?

  • June 23, 2006, 6:20 p.m. CST

    Saw them filming for the second straight Friday....

    by amrisharmpit

    Last Friday, they were in Soho. They filmed Tobey strutting down Broadway, very Travolta-esque. Today I saw them in Tribeca where Kirsten&#39;s stand-in was filmed walking a bunch of dogs (like one of those professional dog-walkers). Maybe MJ does this to support her acting career? Guess we&#39;ll find out.

  • June 23, 2006, 6:22 p.m. CST

    J. Jonah Jameson and zacdilone

    by Petro45

    You both seem upset that they&#39;re not going with the shape-shifting alien costume from the comics. Please check out my post above on this point. How would you justify having Peter Parker, a smart guy, willingly prance around in some shape-shifting goo that sticks to his skin without thinking "hey, maybe this isn&#39;t a great idea"?

  • June 23, 2006, 6:26 p.m. CST

    no Zacdilone...

    by deadpool51

    you&#39;ll see a cg effect of the costuem going over his old suit, but the practicle suit is the black oen we have seen. it snot gonna be as bad as you think once it shows up on film.

  • June 23, 2006, 6:30 p.m. CST

    Venom - lame villain or great one??

    by Petro45

    People who thought Venom was a great villain in the comics are upset because Raimi is treating him differently in the film. People who thought Venom was a terrible villain in the comics are upset because they don&#39;t want him anywhere near the movie.-----------People in the first category, you can ignore this post - there&#39;s no accounting for your taste in any event, so I&#39;m not going to waste my time preaching to you. But people in the second category, take heart -- I too thought Venom sucked as a character in the books. He has Spider-Man&#39;s suit, but he&#39;s stronger because he&#39;s a body-builder, yeah! And he has a really big tongue that looks gross and licks people!! And he talks about the "innocents" a lot while murdering people! What a great villain! Uch. But the different route they&#39;re taking in the movie could be intriguing - by casting Topher, it seems like they&#39;re really going for more of the "dark Spidey doppelganger with a grudge" vibe, rather than the "mutant body builder with a tongue" vibe. The initial concept of Venom in the comics was good, but the execution was shite. I have hope that Raimi&#39;s going to get it right.

  • June 23, 2006, 6:40 p.m. CST

    Dasher - about MJ and the dogs...

    by W3bzpinn3r

    MJ also was on a leash. She&#39;s such a bitch that they have to walk her like one.

  • June 23, 2006, 6:41 p.m. CST


    by Seph_J

    Raimi is about as close to legend status as a human can get. Spidey 2 was of a quality that is almost unheard of in &#39;action&#39; films, and especially comic-book ones! I trust the man with my life. He will do no wrong. Think Superman Returns is good? I hope so. But I guarantee that Spidey 3 will enter levels of previously-unreached spectacularity on an unprescedented scale of epic, grandoise filmic and emotional proportions. Bring it on. I love it all. Love love love love love.

  • June 23, 2006, 6:51 p.m. CST

    W3bzpinn3r: LOL!!!!!!!

    by amrisharmpit

    Oh man, that one works on a few levels. Good one.

  • June 23, 2006, 6:54 p.m. CST

    so it was real...

    by v1cious

    remember all the people who said that Gargoyle pic was fake?

  • June 23, 2006, 7:05 p.m. CST

    wow petro45...

    by deadpool51

    you really didnt read the original venom saga did you? first he isnt stronger cause he is a body builder. He is stronger because eddie is excepting the suit totally taking his body over unlike spiderman who was fighting it. The tounge thing is to show that the suit is a monster and not just an outfitt. Adn the innocent thing... he never murdered anyone (carnage did) Venom didnt, infact he woudl save people that were close to gettign killed while he was fighting spidey. I remmebr a 2 page board of ven holdign back a lion at a zoo who got out of its cage, from almost eating two kids, with one hand and strangling spidey with the other. one of my favorite comic book moments. Just shows that all he is obessed about is killing peter parker not civilians like other villians. thats what makes him so interesting, he doesnt care about ruling the world, or robbing a bank, he just wants spidey dead.

  • June 23, 2006, 7:06 p.m. CST

    spiderman 3 teaser

    by franchise

    Dude, has a totally different teaser trailer for spiderman 3 than what moriaty saw. Check it out, it even shows Venom looking like he&#39;s about to fu... up some sh...!

  • June 23, 2006, 7:15 p.m. CST


    by deadpool51

    there all fake dude.

  • June 23, 2006, 7:51 p.m. CST

    Speaking of sequels

    by The_Deathticle

    Allow me to digress from the topic for a moment, but I don&#39;t know where else to post this. What&#39;s the deal with that new Doritos commercial featuring 1998 American Godzilla??? Are they starting the hype machine up for a sequel that I haven&#39;t heard about? If not --- Wow... how random. Anyway, back on topic, SP3 will pwn, or something.

  • June 23, 2006, 8:05 p.m. CST

    seriously , how can people even say that about superman

    by rubensreviews

    how can they even say superman looks like shit or it doesn&#39;t excite them. To see how far cinema has come where a man can actually look like he is flying compared to 1978. I mean why can&#39;t these naysayers give credit where credit is due , how this superman is far more faithful than anything that was going to be directed by McG or Brett Ratner. I mean cmon ! how can you call yourselves avid film buffs and not give credit where credit is due?

  • June 23, 2006, 8:37 p.m. CST

    "Spidey gets the symbiote from Gwen"

    by zfisk

  • June 23, 2006, 9:08 p.m. CST

    You&#39;re a dick

    by BAMF


  • June 23, 2006, 9:34 p.m. CST

    "In a wuuuurld where..."

    by Christopher3

    What happened to those trailers? Last one of those I remember is "Alien 3."

  • June 23, 2006, 9:43 p.m. CST

    fucking tease

    by ATARI

  • June 23, 2006, 10:02 p.m. CST

    Is is possible

    by Thorn28

    Is it possible to post things on youtube, google video, etc without them being traced back to you? I have the teaser, but don&#39;t want sony coming down on me or someting...

  • June 23, 2006, 10:09 p.m. CST


    by moto

    To whoever said that Raimi is a legend: What makes him a legend? Steven Spielberg is a legend. Stanley Kubrick is a legend. Raimi&#39;s directed hmmm, a couple of sub par but entertaining independant horror movies, and two pretty good superhero movies. That makes him a legend? This is what I&#39;m talking about. He&#39;s a good guy but soooo overrated with AICN fanboys. He&#39;s made some good movies besides those mentioned, one of my favorites being A SIMPLE PLAN, but he&#39;s HARDLY anything close to a legend.

  • June 23, 2006, 11:53 p.m. CST

    "What&#39;s with Doritos commercial featuring Godzilla?"

    by Triumph poops!

    Deathticle, my guess is the 1988 GODZILLA movie bombed so badly that the accounting department at Sony was nothing less than ecstatic and dancing on their desks when someone walked in and said "Hey, we&#39;ll give you 100 bucks to license some Godzilla footage to use in our chips commercial." Seriously, there&#39;s no hype or subtle build-up here for a new movie. For crying out loud, would ANYONE want to see a sequel to that abomination? Which is a shame. I thought Emmerich and Devlin delivered a fun summer popcorn flick with ID4 and as a result I thought they&#39;d do the same with GODZILLA (hey, the teasers seemed to promise a good movie) but unfortunately their GODZILLA missed the mark by a billion miles and just totally sucked ass. Starting with the most basic fubar of all: Why the hell would you license a major, geek-beloved, world-known character like Godzilla and NOT make him LOOK like Godzilla? Yes, yes, I know -- that actually had to do with Toho Studios insisting as part of the licensing deal that he had to look different in the American version. But seriously, at that point, you&#39;d think someone in the meeting room would have looked right at the Toho guys and said, "Why the fuck would we want to give you guys a sack of money to license Godzilla if we can&#39;t actually USE Godzilla?" Then again, that&#39;s Hollywood suit mentality for you once again since obviuosly all the dolts in THAT meeting thought it WAS a good idea!

  • June 24, 2006, 12:17 a.m. CST

    As for SPIDEY 3, I agee with others -- MJ will die

    by Triumph poops!

    Just a hunch. You have to figure that will (1) give Dunst what she wants, namely out of her contract and out of the series since she&#39;s openly said she&#39;s tired of doing the films... (2) it will play to her vanity as an actress since it will give her the one thing all actors whine and plead for, namely a big death scene... (3) It will give the movies a sense of symmetry when Green Goblin 2 tosses her off a bridge and kills her (much like the comic death of Gwen Stacy) at which point everyone in the audience (that is, the non-comics readers, but movie series fans) will say "Wow! Isn&#39;t that clever the way they set that up all the way back in the first movie?"... (4) Raimi has already stated Peter will lose someone close to him... and (5) for the purists out there, Peter will be back with who he should have been with all along, the REAL love of his life, Gwen Stacy. Plus, now there will be fresh blood and new eye candy for the next movie or two. Of course, as you switch out the women, the bigger question becomes at what point does Toby become too old or outgrow the role or become too tired of doing it as well and they have to switch out him?

  • June 24, 2006, 12:53 a.m. CST


    by icecubejdi1544

    how the hell are they going to do all 3 of them against him in 2 hours...ah well, as long as maryjane bites the dust before the end ill be happy

  • June 24, 2006, 1:18 a.m. CST

    3 villians?

    by Titus05

    Raimi recently stated that there are going to be 4 villians in the movie...speculation is that Black Cat is the 4th villian he is referring to....why the hell is he trying to cram in 4 major villians in one movie for?...there&#39;s no way he can give them all the proper screen;s gonna feel rushed...not to mention the fact that Gwen Stacy also is gonna be introduced in this movie as well...he better expand it to 4 hours for all Raimi planning on leaving after this film so he wants to cram in all his ideas into this one last big hurrah?...he&#39;s overdoing it

  • June 24, 2006, 1:29 a.m. CST

    In Raimi&#39;s DEFENSE regarding numerous villians..

    by moto

    ... He was talking about a couple of cameos that show up. Possible set up for future movies. Nothing to extreme. There will NOT be 4 major villains fighting Spider-Man. Just Sandman and Venom. James Franco will be battling his demons, but the Green Goblin won&#39;t reappear in his new form until later in the film to possibly set up the fourth. So while Spider-Man is doing his whole Spidey movie villian fighting thing with those two, we&#39;ll see a side story of Franco&#39;s issues. I get excited about these films... and then I&#39;m just let down, but who knows, maybe the third will be better. At least I like the villians this time around.

  • June 24, 2006, 2:11 a.m. CST

    Please stop posting trailer descriptions as news

    by Doc_McCoy

  • June 24, 2006, 3:17 a.m. CST

    Please let them get this Venom crap out of the way in 3

    by ZeroCorpse we can get back to cool, old-school, well-written Spidey villains, instead of lame-ass "evil Spider-Man". Venom sucks. Bring on Mysterio, the Lizard, the Vulture, and other cool enemies. And I swear if one of you monkeys asks for the JMS "Iron Spider" costume in the next movie, I&#39;ll send bad vibes to you while you sleep!

  • June 24, 2006, 3:20 a.m. CST

    The real issue with GINO in the Doritos ad...

    by ZeroCorpse

    Is that that stupid giant iguana is supposed to be dead- Killed by the real Godzilla a few years back in a genuine Toho film.

  • June 24, 2006, 3:35 a.m. CST

    Multiple villains: It works in KILL BILL...

    by ZeroCorpse

    By my count, KILL BILL VOL. 1 had about 100 villains, and From Dusk Till Dawn had a similar number, as well as a very large number of heroes. What made Batman suck was the hokey direction Burton took from the beginning, and the fruity continuation of that trend in Schumaker&#39;s version. I&#39;m sorry, but any movie in which you find GIANT PENQUINS WITH ROCKETS STRAPPED TO THEIR BACKS BEING COMMANDED BY A GOO-SPITTING DANNY DeVITO IN LONG JOHNS is doomed from the beginning. Burton&#39;s lack of respect for Batman (killing hundreds, not being a decent detective, basically being James Bond in a bat suit, etc.) is why the Batman movies sucked. Nicholson&#39;s hammy Joker being played as Jack Torrence in clown makeup was a phoned-in performance if I ever saw one. Schumaker just illuminated the Burton crap with neon.

  • June 24, 2006, 3:49 a.m. CST

    GINO has been killed twice

    by CuervoJones

    But remember there was a lot of mini-GINOS in that movie...Ok, this is a stupid comment

  • June 24, 2006, 10:52 a.m. CST

    Gosh moviemack...

    by brycemonkey

    reports of your death have been greatly exaggerated!

  • June 24, 2006, 12:53 p.m. CST

    I hope MJ does die.

    by Thumper2k1

    That girl they got to play Gwen is damn hot. I don&#39;t understand the hatred of venom. He&#39;s one of the better Spiderman villians.

  • June 24, 2006, 1:36 p.m. CST


    by reckni

    That would be a great villain to have . .

  • June 24, 2006, 1:55 p.m. CST

    This is why some people don&#39;t like Venom

    by wolack22

    Because they wan&#39;t to be different, and seem cool cause they enjoy the early spider-man villains. The early spider-man villains may be alright, but I dont see a difference between their character significance and venom&#39;s. There is no dynamic difference. There is no reason to suggest that mysterio, electro, lizard, scorpion, etc are better than Venom. All this bs about venom being the evil spider-man is completely unsubstaniated as a reason for hating venom. Who cares if venom is an evil spidey. Some of the greatest villains in the history of literature and comics were villains who mimicked the hero&#39;s intelligance, strength,and ingenuity except in evilness. In conclusion, they just want to be different and cool. They know the majority of fans enjoy venom, and find him just as intriguing as the old spidey-villains... they just want to complain.

  • June 24, 2006, 5:50 p.m. CST

    Pirates of the Caribbean 3 early draft

    by IMofPOTC

    Pirates of the Caribbean 3 script

  • June 24, 2006, 6 p.m. CST


    by CptHowdy75

  • June 24, 2006, 7:37 p.m. CST

    Comic fans hate Venom because he was overexposed...

    by Flim Springfield

    He became so popular so fast, he started appearing way too much, and became a "noble" villain, sometimes even a hero, which sold out the character and made him lame. Not to mention Carnage and a bunch of other spin-off characters that made you wish you never heard the word "symbiote".

  • June 24, 2006, 9:43 p.m. CST

    BOTS Rule

    by Mr_Satan

    Come on with names like CY-kill how bad was it? Never mind crack just wore off.Anyone know when they are going to bring Black Panther to the screen?

  • June 25, 2006, 1:51 a.m. CST

    by meccabilly

    CPTHPWDY75 - That trailer is fake... Its not a bad attempt but it wont fool to many people... I feel sorry for the guy who rotoscoped spidey for the shots of him in black...

  • June 25, 2006, 1:52 a.m. CST


    by meccabilly

    Damn subject lines... see above

  • June 25, 2006, 11:32 a.m. CST

    Where THE ZONE Go???

    by ZombieSolutions

    Where THE ZONE Go???

  • June 25, 2006, 12:21 p.m. CST


    by DECKERS

    Fat american kids are gonna think SPIdey is made of that ebony candy treat and eat Spiderman all up. 3 Villains?..FUCK OFF! Yes I have been drinking

  • June 25, 2006, 6:09 p.m. CST

    the webshooter change was the least of the problems

    by Kelg

    I think there must be something about writers and directors who were weaned mainly on cartoons and comics feeling that they have to make changes so they can be taken more seriously. Burton did it, Raimi did it, but Donner and Puzo--nope, they didnt do it. No need to put Superman&#39;s underwear on the inside, or get rid of the xray vision(as Raimi might say: unrealistic! he would melt his glasses!!!). I suspect it is because Donner and Puzo came from well-rounded careers so they didnt feel insecure about a superhero movie. Sure--changing the webshooters in order to make an implausible fantasy movie more plausible was Hollywood idiocy at its best. But the stupidest ideas were throwing away 20 years of Spider-man history and pushing the married storyline from the late 80s by making Parker have a crush on Mary Jane since age 6, with a window maybe 12 inches apart from her, and never talking to her. Worst cliche that even a soap opera comic would avoid. On top of that, here&#39;s a guy given super powers, and the only thing he can think of is making enough money to buy a car to impress MJ. Come on! Next: turning Flash Thompson into a goon. Raimi may have read Spider-man, but he sure didnt get it. Another big sin was making Parker have a fight with Uncle Ben for no good reason other than to give him a heavyhanded bit of extra guilt(and making the character less dimensional than his comics counterpart by having the fight promoter rip him off just before the burglar comes by). Wasnt it more dramatic that he became arrogant? Then in Spider-man 2, the problems continue right with the opening shot of Mary Jane on a billboard--here we go with the love story again(Lois Lane was far more central to Superman history and even they didnt hit you over the head with it). Turning Dock Ock into another lovesick sap who gives Parker advice: "woo her with poetry--worked for me!" Oh-and then they throw a nod to the early Spidey story where he loses his powers-but of course, completely fuck it up. Did I mention that threw out Spidey&#39;s habit of mocking villains? Stan Lee must be rolling in his grave. Oh right he isnt dead. Well he will be rolling soon enough!

  • June 26, 2006, 8:21 a.m. CST

    Kelg is a genius!

    by meccabilly

    Wow, you&#39;re absolutely right! They should have included every single bit of obscure Spiderman story detail! From every comic! In the same chronology! ---- Peter&#39;s parents are killed by Albert Malik, the third Red Skull while infiltrating his criminal organization? Cool ok - make sure you drop in a flashback to explain that he&#39;s the THIRD red skull mind you! --- Peter makes the spider webbing himself? Sure! He could have knocked them - hes good at science right, but dont forget his spider-themed portable spotlight! nor his poisoned toxic stingers... he can kill the bad guys easier then! --- You got the love interest thing wrong tho... Liz Allen was the first love interest... but she marries Harry... So MJ totally shouldn&#39;t have appeared yet! Not before Betty Brant anyway, who marries Daily Bugle reporter Ned Leeds (very important plot line!). - and don&#39;t forget that Gwen, pregnant by Norman Osborn, secretly gives birth to twins, who, told by Norman that Spider-Man had killed their mother, attempt to kill Spider-Man in revenge as adults. That&#39;s the most important part - you could follow it up in Spiderman 10 - Revence of Norman&#39;s Kids! ---- Also don&#39;t forget Peter dates Sarah Rushman during a time when he believes Mary Jane to be dead; however, she turns out to be the S.H.I.E.L.D.-brainwashed mutant Marrow! ---- Wow dude! Those films would have been much better! But you have to include everything, ok? That includes iron-spidey, spider-girl and the bit where Spidey sees his Uncle Ben alive but was unaware that this Uncle Ben came from a different reaility. Just in the middle of a conversation, the Hobgoblin from the year 2211 appears and takes Spider-Man away! Wow... This will all make perfect sense and fit a smooth logical chronology of course------------ Or do you perhaps wish to pick and choose from the comics which parts you like best? And a film is only a couple of hours long - you would have to condense some of the stories to fit them - and which villains to choose and how to portray them and so on and so on.... Of course YOU would absolutely make the BEST deicisions FAR BETTER then Sam Raimi could EVER make them. YOU love spidey better then ANYONE and have more RESPECT for the character then silly old Sam... Poor old Sam Raimi - he&#39;ll never be as good as you at making films...... He cries himself to sleep at night i&#39;m sure.

  • June 26, 2006, 2:35 p.m. CST

    Seems like there&#39;s too much for one movie...

    by Capt. Murphy

    but I like and respect Sam Raimi quite a bit, if anyone can pull it off, I&#39;d like to think it&#39;s him. Can&#39;t believe it&#39;s still a year away...sigh.

  • June 26, 2006, 2:38 p.m. CST


    by vinceklortho

    should be up on the internet sometime tommorow...July 27th.

  • June 26, 2006, 8:57 p.m. CST


    by Tai_Pan

    Venom did kill people. At least he did towards the beginning. Sometimes he would suffocate them with the suit or webbing. He did often express remorse, though. And meccabilly.... good points. It seems a bit excessive and nitpicky to ask that the comice be followed 100%. As for me, I already know the comics, so I don&#39;t mind seeing the little twists and turns and new stuff.

  • June 27, 2006, 2:52 p.m. CST


    by Sixxgunn13

    goto to see it ...bitches

  • June 27, 2006, 2:52 p.m. CST


    by Sixxgunn13

  • June 28, 2006, 1:40 a.m. CST

    Hanging by a... missing web?

    by jeeefer

    The ending of the Spider-Man 3 teaser trailer is striking for more than one reason... the red-suited Spidey is hanging onto NOTHING! It appears that webbing is clinched between his feet, and his fingers look like they&#39;re gripping something, but no strand of web can be seen in his hands... he&#39;s hanging in thin air! The true secret of Spiderman 3 is that Spidey can now levitate indefinitely, or has invisible webbing... frame through the ending shot of the teaser trailer to see for yourself.